Priority of Service for Covered Persons, 48086-48095 [E8-18869]
Download as PDF
48086
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Veterans’ Employment and Training
Service
20 CFR Part 1010
RIN 1293–AA15
Priority of Service for Covered Persons
Veterans’ Employment and
Training Service, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking;
request for comments.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Veterans’ Employment
and Training Service (VETS) of the
Department of Labor (Department or
DOL) is proposing a rule to implement
priority of service in qualified job
training programs prescribed in section
2(a)(1) of the Jobs for Veterans Act
(JVA). The Department undertakes this
rulemaking in accordance with section
605 of the Veterans’ Benefits, Health
Care, and Information Technology Act
of 2006, which requires the Department
to implement priority of service via
regulation. The Department seeks
comments on this proposed rule.
DATES: To ensure consideration,
comments must be received on or before
October 14, 2008. Comments received
after that date will be considered to the
extent possible.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) 1293–AA15, by either
one of the two following methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web
site instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Written comments, disk, and CD–ROM
submissions may be mailed or delivered
by hand delivery/courier to Gordon
Burke, Director, Office of Grants and
Transition Programs, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room S–1312, Washington, DC 20210.
Instructions: Please submit one copy
of your comments by only one method.
All submissions received must include
the agency name, as well as RIN 1293–
AA15.
Please be advised that the Department
will post all comments received on
www.regulations.gov without making
any change to the comments, including
any personal information provided. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is the
Federal e-rulemaking portal and all
comments posted there are available
and accessible to the public. Therefore,
the Department recommends that
commenters safeguard their personal
information such as Social Security
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
Numbers, personal addresses, telephone
numbers, and e-mail addresses included
in their comments. It is the
responsibility of the commenter to
safeguard his or her information.
Also, please note that due to security
concerns, postal mail delivery in
Washington, DC, may be delayed.
Therefore, in order to ensure that
comments receive full consideration,
the Department encourages the public to
submit comments via the Internet as
indicated above.
Docket: The Department will make all
the comments it receives available for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the above address. If
you need assistance to review the
comments, the Department will provide
you with appropriate aids such as
readers or print magnifiers. The
Department will make copies of the
proposed rule available, upon request,
in large print or electronic file on
computer disk. The Department will
consider providing the proposed rule in
other formats upon request. To schedule
an appointment to review the comments
and/or obtain the proposed rule in an
alternate format, contact the office of
Gordon Burke at (202) 693–4740
(VOICE) (this is not a toll-free number)
or (202) 693–4760 (TTY/TDD). You may
also contact Mr. Burke’s office at the
address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela Langley, Chief, Division of Grant
Programs, Veterans’ Employment and
Training Service, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room S–1312, Washington, DC 20210,
Langley.Pamela@dol.gov, (202) 693–
4708 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
preamble to this proposed rule is
organized as follows:
I. Background—provides a brief description
of the development of the proposed rule.
II. Section-by-Section Review of the Proposed
Rule—summarizes and discusses
proposed regulations.
III. Administrative Information—sets forth
the applicable regulatory requirements.
I. Background
On November 7, 2002, President Bush
signed the Jobs for Veterans Act, Public
Law 107–288 (Nov. 7, 2002). One
provision of the JVA, codified at 38
U.S.C. Section 4215, creates a priority of
service requirement for covered persons
in Department qualified job training
programs. Since the passage of the Act,
the Department has provided policy
guidance to the workforce investment
system regarding the implementation of
priority of service, including the
Department’s Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) issuance of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Training and Employment Guidance
Letter (TEGL) No. 05–03 in September
2003. TEGL No. 05–03 applies to a large
majority of the job training programs
impacted by priority of service. In
December 2006, President Bush signed
the Veterans’ Benefits, Health Care, and
Information Technology Act of 2006
(Pub. L. 109–461). That law requires the
Department to issue regulations
regarding the implementation of priority
of service. The purpose of this notice is
to propose those regulations.
The JVA provides that veterans and
eligible spouses of veterans (as defined
in § 1010.110) are identified as covered
persons and are entitled to priority over
non-covered persons for the receipt of
employment, training, and placement
services provided under new or existing
qualified job training programs,
notwithstanding any other provision of
the law. At 38 U.S.C. 4215(a)(2),
qualified job training programs are
defined as ‘‘any workforce preparation,
development or delivery program or
service that is directly funded, in whole
or in part, by the Department.’’
Currently, such programs are offered by
many agencies within the Department,
including, but not limited to, ETA,
VETS, the Women’s Bureau, and the
Office of Disability Employment Policy
(ODEP).
JVA, and the priority of service it
requires, is an important
acknowledgment of the sacrifices of the
men and women who have served in the
U.S. armed forces. The Department’s
strategic vision for priority of service to
covered persons honors veterans and
eligible spouses of veterans as our
‘‘heroes at home’’ and envisions that
DOL-funded employment and training
programs, including the publiclyfunded workforce investment system,
will identify, inform and deliver
comprehensive services to covered
persons as part of strategic workforce
development activities across the
country. Veterans possess unique
attributes and contribute greatly in the
workplace. They are an important
source of highly skilled and experienced
talent and play an important role in
regional workforce development
strategies. They are highly sought after
by employers and they make excellent
employees. Implementation of priority
of service is designed to provide
covered persons with clear entry points
into high-growth, high wage civilian
jobs and easily accessible postsecondary education and training to
support veterans’ advancement along
career pathways which will benefit
regional economies.
One-Stop Career Centers are the
delivery point for a significant
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
percentage of qualified job training
programs and services covered by the
JVA and are required to implement
priority of service. All One-Stop Career
Centers should have clear strategies for
providing veterans and eligible spouses
of veterans with the highest quality of
service at every phase of services
offered. This can range from basic
functions of the One-Stop System, such
as assistance with job search and
identification of needed skills to more
customized initiatives such as creating
career pathways, with corresponding
competency assessments and training
opportunities, which allow covered
persons to advance their careers in high
growth sectors of the economy. The
Department expects that the One-Stop
System will draw on all available
resources to support the reemployment
needs of covered persons.
Veterans and their spouses have
specific needs and concerns that can be
addressed as DOL-funded employment
and training programs develop strategies
for serving them. When military service
has ended, a major concern for many
veterans is getting a good job. Combat
veterans may experience difficulties
both in finding employment and in
readjusting to civilian work
environments. DOL-funded employment
and training programs should work with
employers to ensure that the value a
veteran brings to the table is understood
and to address any concerns that
employers may have about hiring
veterans. Those veterans who have
sustained injuries or illnesses as a result
of their military service may require
additional support in developing skills
and securing employment. DOL, the
Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs are
collaborating in closely monitoring the
rehabilitation of wounded and injured
veterans so that their readiness for
employment can be assessed and
appropriate preparations for civilian
employment can be made. Upon
achieving job-ready status, these
‘‘heroes at home’’ should be
immediately provided the full array of
employment and training services to
ensure that they make a successful
transition into a civilian career.
Priority of service ensures that
covered persons receive priority
employment and job training services
that will effectively integrate them into
the economy. It does not change a
program’s intended functions; covered
persons still need to meet all statutory
eligibility and program requirements for
participation. Some DOL-funded
employment and training programs have
only general program eligibility
requirements and do not statutorily
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
target specific groups. These programs
require only a straightforward
implementation of priority of service.
However, some DOL-funded
employment and training programs do
carry existing statutory targeting
provisions that must be taken into
account when applying priority of
service. The purpose of this proposed
rule is to articulate how priority of
service is to be applied across all
existing and new qualified job training
programs.
II. Section-by-Section Review of the
Proposed Rule
Subpart A—Purpose and Definitions
What is the purpose and scope of this
part? (§ 1010.100)
Section 1010.100 briefly describes
and supplies the statutory context for
these regulations. The purpose of the
regulations is to implement priority of
service for veterans and eligible spouses
of veterans, collectively identified as
covered persons. These regulations
apply to all workforce preparation,
development or delivery programs
funded in whole or in part by the
Department. These regulations
implement the priority of service
provision of the JVA (38 U.S.C. 4215) as
required by the Veterans’ Benefits,
Health Care, and Information
Technology Act of 2006, Public Law
109–461 (Dec. 22, 2006).
What definitions apply to this part?
(§ 1010.110)
The definitions in this section are
provided to assist in understanding
priority of service, its implementation
and corresponding requirements. For
the most part, these terms incorporate
definitions contained in the Jobs for
Veterans Act. The term ‘‘veteran’’ is
based on the definition in 38 U.S.C.
101(2) and is defined as ‘‘a person who
served in the active military, naval, or
air service, and who was discharged or
released therefrom under conditions
other than dishonorable.’’ As provided
in § 1010.330(c)(2)(i), this will result in
uniformity in the application of and in
the reporting on priority of service for
veterans.
Subpart B—Understanding Priority of
Service
What is priority of service? (§ 1010.200)
Priority of service entitles covered
persons, including veterans and eligible
spouses of veterans who are otherwise
eligible for DOL qualified job training
programs, to receive priority access to
programs or services over non-covered
persons. It is important to emphasize
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
48087
that covered persons must meet a
program’s statutory eligibility
requirements in order to obtain priority
of service in the program.
To carry out these objectives, priority
of service requires that covered persons
take precedence over non-covered
persons in obtaining DOL-funded
services. Section 1010.200 provides that
covered persons receive access to the
service or resource earlier in time than
non-covered persons; or if the service or
resource is limited, covered persons
receive access to the service or resource
instead of or before non-covered
persons.
In which Department job training
programs do covered persons receive
priority of service (§ 1010.210)?
This section stipulates that priority of
service applies to every workforce
preparation, development, or delivery
program or service that is directly
funded in whole or in part by the
Department. Priority of service is
intended to apply to all such programs
currently in operation, as well as all
new such programs that come into
existence in the future. The
implementation of priority of service is
not meant to change the intended
function of a program or service.
The Department funds a broad range
of programs and services that are
affected by priority of service,
including, but not limited to: WagnerPeyser funded employment services; the
Trade Adjustment Assistance Program;
Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs
funded under the Workforce Investment
Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105–220, Aug. 7,
1998) (WIA); WIA Youth Formula
Funded Programs, WIA national
programs; Community Based Job
Training Grants; Job Corps; the
Veterans’ Workforce Investment
Program; Office of Disability
Employment Programs; Pilot and
Demonstration Grants; discretionary
grants such as those using H–1B funds;
and future grant formula or
discretionary grants. As new workforce
preparation, development, or delivery
programs or services funded in whole or
in part by the Department are
developed, they will also be covered by
priority of service.
How are recipients required to
implement priority of service?
(§ 1010.220)
Under paragraph (a) of this section, all
recipients of DOL funding for the
administration and delivery of qualified
job training programs are required to
agree to implement priority of service as
a condition for receipt of any
Department funds for existing and new
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
48088
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
programs. As part of this agreement,
funding recipients must provide the
Department with information on how
priority of service will be implemented.
The agreement may be executed in a
variety of ways, depending on the
program. For example, the Department
may require the agreement as part of the
terms of formal grant award documents
and/or through program governance
documents, such as strategic plans and
State workforce investment plans
submitted under the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998.
Under paragraph (b) of this section, it
is the responsibility of the funding
recipient to ensure that any subrecipients of funds implement priority
of service. As such, funding recipients
should include priority of service and
its associated data collection and
reporting requirements in all requests
for proposals, solicitations for grant
awards, sub-grants, sub-contracts, or
other mechanisms utilized to define
service delivery strategies using DOL
funding, including (where feasible)
memoranda of understanding or other
service delivery agreements.
Do States and political subdivisions of
States have any additional
responsibilities in implementing
priority of service that go beyond what
is expected of recipients? (§ 1010.230)
Because of the importance of their
role in ensuring that priority of service
for covered persons is carried out
throughout the One-Stop Delivery
System, both States and local workforce
investment areas have particular
responsibilities for planning and
establishing policies for the delivery of
priority of service throughout the
workforce investment system. States are
required to address priority of service in
their comprehensive strategic plans, and
they are also required to ensure that
Local Workforce Investment Boards
address priority of service in their
strategic plans. These plans should
identify the processes that a State’s
workforce system will follow to identify
covered persons at the point of entry so
that covered persons can take full
advantage of priority of service. State
entities and political subdivisions of
states are required to ensure that
covered persons are made aware of the
programs and the benefits conveyed by
priority of service and that covered
persons understand: (a) Their
entitlement to priority of service; (b) the
full array of employment, training, and
placement services available under
priority service, and (c) any applicable
eligibility requirements for those
programs or services. It is the
responsibility of states to ensure that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
state and local policies are in place to
fulfill these requirements.
Will the Department be monitoring for
compliance with priority of service?
(§ 1010.240)
The Department is committed to
ensuring full and proper
implementation of priority of service
across the nation. Therefore, the
Department will monitor and evaluate
recipients of funds for qualified job and
training programs to ensure that covered
persons are made aware of and are
afforded priority of service. The
responsibility for monitoring priority of
service will be shared jointly between
VETS and the DOL agency responsible
for administration and oversight of the
program. At the regional level, VETS
staff will coordinate monitoring reviews
and validation visits with the
appropriate federal official with
comparable responsibility for the
qualified job training program.
Monitoring and evaluation will include
collecting information indicating that
covered persons are afforded priority of
service in qualified job training
programs, and ensuring that covered
persons are made aware of priority of
service at the point of entry and are
afforded its benefits. The processes to
address the inability of grantees to
perform programmatic requirements,
such as the application of priority of
service, vary by program. At a
minimum, if a recipient is found to not
be in compliance with the requirement
to provide priority of service to covered
persons, the recipient will be required
to submit a corrective action plan.
Can priority of service be waived?
(§ 1010.250)
In accordance with 38 U.S.C.
4215(a)(3), priority of service will be
applied for covered persons in all
qualified programs and services
‘‘notwithstanding any other provision of
law’’ and cannot be waived.
Subpart C—Applying Priority of Service
for Covered Persons
What processes are to be implemented
to identify covered persons?
(§ 1010.300)
To ensure complete implementation
of priority of service, recipients of funds
for qualified job training programs must
have procedures in place to identify
covered persons as quickly as possible
in order to promptly inform them about
their priority of service benefits,
regardless of whether those benefits are
being delivered in person or over the
Web. As described in greater detail in
conjunction with the review of
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 1010.330, DOL has identified ‘‘point of
entry’’ as the point at which customers
first come into contact with DOL-funded
employment and training programs.
Points of entry may include reception
through a One-Stop Career Center
established pursuant to the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998, as part of an
application process for a specific
program, or through any other method
by which covered persons express an
interest in receiving services, either inperson or virtually. These processes are
to ensure that:
(1) Covered persons are identified at
the point of entry to allow them to take
the fullest advantage of priority of
service; and
(2) To ensure covered persons
understand:
(a) Their entitlement to priority of
service,
(b) The full array of employment and
training services available under
priority of service, and
(c) Any eligibility requirements the
covered person must meet in order to
gain entry into the program or to be
provided services by the program.
These procedures must ensure that
covered persons are identified at the
point of entry so that they have the
opportunity to take advantage of priority
of service. For example, a program with
intake procedures must ascertain during
intake whether the applicant is a
covered person so that the covered
person can be afforded priority during
the receipt of all applicable subsequent
services.
Because of the broad scope of
qualified job training programs, a single
procedure for all programs is not
feasible and will not be specified.
Instead, each program will need to
develop those procedures that best fit
within that program’s context and
current client flow process.
How will priority of service be applied?
(§ 1010.310)
As mentioned above, veterans must
meet program eligibility requirements in
order to obtain priority. This section
discusses the different ways that
programs may target groups of eligible
individuals and how such targeting
interacts with the priority of service.
Some DOL-funded qualified job training
programs have only general program
eligibility requirements and do not
statutorily target specific groups. For
these programs, implementing priority
of service for covered persons is
relatively straightforward. However,
DOL also administers a number of
programs that have existing federal
statutory or discretionary targeting
provisions that prioritize certain
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
population groups. The Department is
using this rule-making opportunity to
clarify and codify how such priorities
should be balanced when implementing
priority of service in those programs
with federal statutory priorities. The
veterans’ priority of service will always
take precedence over state- or locallyimposed priorities and preferences.
Many qualified job training programs
also provide more than one phase of
service. For example, within the OneStop Career Center, a continuum of
services may be available, ranging from
self-service and information to career
counseling and training, depending
upon the needs of the customer. It is
important to note that covered persons
must be given priority of service
throughout this continuum of services.
Identifying covered persons at the point
of entry is a means of ensuring that
covered persons have access to and are
afforded priority in receiving the full
array of services available throughout
the different phases of service delivery.
For the purposes of implementing
priority of service, all DOL-funded
qualified job training programs fall into
one of three broad categories: (1)
Programs whose eligibility requirements
do not target specific groups (universal
access); (2) programs with discretionary
targeting of specific groups pursuant to
a federal statute or regulation; (3)
programs with statutory targeting of
specific groups pursuant to a federal
statute or regulation. For each of these
three categories, instructions for
applying priority of service are provided
below:
1. Programs whose eligibility
requirements do not target specific
groups (universal access):
Some DOL-funded qualified
programs, such as Wagner-Peyser
employment services, are available to
eligible individuals from the general
population as a whole. For these
programs, funding recipients must
identify covered persons and give all
covered persons priority of service over
non-covered persons for program
services.
2. Programs with discretionary
targeting of specific groups pursuant to
a federal statute or regulation:
Some DOL-funded qualified job
training programs are designed by
statute or regulation to focus on a
particular group, or to make efforts to
provide a certain level of service to such
a group, but such focus is optional or
discretionary. In that case, priority of
service takes precedence over the
discretionary priority. This means that
funding recipients are required to
provide covered persons the highest
priority over non-covered persons. Non-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
covered persons within the
discretionary area of focus would then
receive priority over non-covered
persons outside the discretionary area of
focus. The discretionary targeting will
still remain consistent with the federal
statutory and/or regulatory provision(s)
governing the discretionary targeting.
3. Programs with statutory targeting
pursuant to a federal statute or
regulation:
Some qualified programs have
mandatory priorities or priorities
required by federal law. These targeting
provisions mandate priority or
preference for a particular group of
individuals, such as the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA) Adult Program
(which requires, by statute, that priority
for intensive and training services be
given to recipients of public assistance
and other low-income individuals,
when funds allocated to a local area are
limited) or require spending a certain
portion of program funds on a particular
group of persons receiving services,
such as the WIA Youth Program (which
requires that at least 30% of funds be
spent on out-of-school youth). For these
programs containing a federal statutory
priority, funding recipients should
implement priority of service in the
following order: (1) Covered persons
who meet the mandatory priorities or
spending requirement or limitation
would receive the highest priority for
the program; (2) Non-covered persons
within the program’s mandatory
priorities would receive preference
before covered persons outside the
program’s mandatory priorities; and (3)
Covered persons outside the program’s
mandatory priorities would receive
priority over any non-covered persons
outside the program’s mandatory
priorities.
Will recipients be required to collect
information and report on priority of
service? (§ 1010.320)
Yes, recipients of funds will be
required to collect information and
report on priority of service. JVA
requires the Department to evaluate: (1)
Whether covered persons are receiving
priority of service; (2) whether covered
persons are being fully served by
qualified job training programs; and (3)
whether the representation of covered
persons in such programs is in
proportion to the incidence of
representation of covered persons in the
labor market. The data to be collected
and maintained, as described in
§ 1010.330, will play a direct role in
enabling the Department to fulfill the
statutory responsibilities of evaluating
whether covered persons are receiving
priority of service and are being fully
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
48089
served by qualified job training
programs, and whether the
representation of covered persons in
such programs is in proportion to the
incidence of representation of covered
persons in the labor market. In addition,
by calling covered persons to the
attention of program staff at the point of
entry, the requirement to collect data on
covered persons is expected to reinforce
the provision of timely information to
covered persons about their right to
priority, about available services and
about applicable eligibility
requirements, as required by § 1010.300.
What are the responsibilities of
recipients to collect and maintain data
on covered and non-covered persons?
(§ 1010.330)
Each recipient of funds must collect
data and maintain records that indicate
covered person status to determine
whether the funding recipient is
providing priority of service as required
by the Secretary. This regulation is
accompanied by an Information
Collection Request (ICR) that identifies
the initial set of requirements. Those
requirements are to be implemented for
selected qualified job training programs
in coordination with the approval of the
ICR, with the expectation of
implementing those requirements on
July 1 of the subsequent program year.
Some qualified job training programs
are not included in the ICR that
accompanies this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM). For each of those
programs, the reporting requirements
related to priority of service will be
identified as part of that program’s
periodic renewal of approval for an
existing information collection or as
part of that program’s request for a new
information collection, whichever first
follows the approval of the ICR that
accompanies this NPRM. VETS will
review information collection
requirements for programs not included
in the initial ICR to ensure they meet the
reporting requirements for priority of
service.
In developing information collection
and reporting requirements, the
Department has taken into consideration
the broad scope of programs to which
these reporting requirements will apply.
The Department also considered the fact
that priority of service addresses
processes experienced by customers,
both covered and non-covered, before
they receive services. In designing its
approach to data collection and
reporting on priority of service, DOL
identified ‘‘point of entry’’ as the point
at which customers first come into
contact with DOL-funded employment
and training programs. Since customers
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
48090
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
can make initial contact with these
programs in a wide variety of ways,
point of entry embraces a variety of
situations. For example, some customers
first contact One-Stop Career Centers,
while others apply directly for specific
DOL-funded employment and training
programs. In either of those cases,
customers also may make their initial
contacts at physical locations or by
remotely accessing electronic resources.
In conjunction with the identification of
point of entry, DOL also designated
customers at this stage as ‘‘entrants,’’
who can be either covered or noncovered.
In assessing the available options for
measuring priority of service, the
Department carefully considered the
benefits that would be derived and the
burdens that would be imposed if data
were collected and reported on both
covered and non-covered entrants.
While that would have allowed DOL to
compare the rates of entry to services for
both groups, DOL concluded that
requiring data collection and reporting
for non-covered entrants would be
disproportionately burdensome to both
workforce professionals and their
customers, the overwhelming majority
of whom are not covered persons.
Specifically, historical data on veteran
participation suggest that non-covered
entrants will represent over four-fifths
of all entrants. Therefore, the
Department has determined that entrant
data collection and reporting will be
restricted to covered entrants.
Similarly, DOL considered requiring
entrant data collection for all qualified
job training programs. In that case also,
an assessment of the trade-offs between
the benefits and the burdens for
programs of different sizes indicated
that data collection and reporting on
covered entrants should be restricted to
six major workforce programs that
historically surpassed a ‘‘threshold’’
level of veteran participation. The
threshold level identified is
participation of 1,000 or more veteran
participants per year, on average over
the prior three years. Of the nine major
workforce programs included in the
Annual Report on veterans’
employment, the six programs above the
threshold level accounted for 99.9% of
the veteran participants. In light of the
expected concentration of covered
entrants in those six programs, DOL has
determined that data collection and
reporting on covered entrants will be
restricted to those six programs
(Wagner-Peyser, WIA Adult, WIA
Dislocated Worker, WIA National
Emergency Grant, Senior Community
Service Employment, and Trade
Adjustment Assistance Programs).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
All funding recipients also must
collect and maintain data on covered
and non-covered persons who receive
services (also known as ‘participants’).
The information to be collected may
include, but is not limited to: (1) The
covered and non-covered person status
of all persons receiving services; (2) the
types of services provided to covered
and non-covered persons; (3) the dates
in which services were received by
covered and non-covered persons; and
(4) the employment outcomes
experienced by covered and noncovered persons receiving services. In
collecting data on the services provided
to and the outcomes experiences by
persons receiving services, funding
recipients must apply the definitions set
forth in § 1010.110 to distinguish
covered from non-covered persons
receiving services and, within covered
persons, to distinguish veterans from
eligible spouses.
III. Administrative Information
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis,
Executive Order 13272, and Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. Chapter 6, requires the
Department to evaluate the economic
impact of this proposed rule with regard
to small entities. The RFA defines small
entities to include small businesses,
small organizations including not-forprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. The
Department must determine whether the
proposed rule imposes a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of such small entities.
The Department has determined that
there is no significant economic impact
resulting from this NPRM. The JVA
mandates that veterans receive priority
of service in all qualified job training
programs. The purpose of this NPRM is
to implement the JVA’s priority of
service requirement. It defines the
program and reporting requirements for
ongoing programs funded by the
Department (and any new programs
created in the future) and administered
by funding recipients. The priority of
service provisions in the JVA do not
create any new job training programs;
rather, the programs affected by the
priority of service are ongoing. The
proposed rule requires funding
recipients to do certain things, such as
implement processes to identify covered
persons at the point of entry and report
on priority of service. However, the
Department funds these programs and
the funds are meant to include such
activities as administration and
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
reporting. Although certain funding
recipients that operate qualified job
training programs may be small entities,
the Department certifies that this NPRM
does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the provisions of the RFA
and also under the provisions of
Executive Order 13272.
Finally, the Department has also
determined that this rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ for purposes of The Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C.
Chapter 8, requires agencies to take
certain actions when a ‘‘major rule’’ is
promulgated. SBREFA defines a ‘‘major
rule’’ as one that has or will likely to
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices for,
among other things, state or local
government agencies; or in significant
and adverse effects on the U.S. business
climate. For the reasons already
discussed, this proposed rule will not
have any significant financial impact.
Accordingly, none of the definitions of
‘‘major rule’’ apply in this instance.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 requires that
for each ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
proposed by the Department, the
Department conduct an assessment of
the proposed regulatory action and
provide the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) with the proposed
regulation and the requisite assessment
prior to publishing the regulation. A
significant regulatory action is defined
to include an action that will have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, as well as an action
that raises a novel legal or policy issue.
The priority of service implemented
by this proposed rule will not have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, for the reasons outlined
above. While much of the proposed rule
is consistent with current DOL policy,
certain portions may raise novel policy
issues. Accordingly, OMB has reviewed
this proposed rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., include minimizing the
paperwork burden on affected entities.
The PRA requires certain actions before
an agency can adopt or revise the
collection of information, including
publishing a summary of the collection
of information and a brief description of
the need for and proposed use of the
information.
The Department hereby announces
that the collections of information
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
contained in this proposed rule, and
identified as such, have been submitted
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with section 3507(d) of the
PRA. A copy of this submission, with
applicable supporting documentation, a
description of the likely respondents,
proposed frequency of response, and
estimated total burden, may be obtained
at https://www.doleta.gov/OMBCN/
OMBControlNumber.cfm or from the
RegInfo.gov Web site at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain or
by contacting Darrin A. King, Acting
Departmental Clearance Officer, on 202–
693–4129 (this is not a toll-free
number); e-mail: king.darrin@dol.gov.
The Department invites comments on
the collections of information contained
in this proposed rule. Comments may be
submitted by e-mail to
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
Comments also may be sent to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
Room 10235, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503;
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Employment and Training
Administration. Although comments
may be submitted through October 14,
2008, OMB requests that comments be
received within 30 days of publication
of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
ensure their consideration. In order to
ensure the appropriate consideration,
comments should reference the OMB
Control Number: 1205–0NEW. The
OMB is particularly interested in
comments that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Type of Review: Request for New
Collection.
Title of the Collection: Application for
Priority of Service Data Collection.
OMB Control Number: 1205–0NEW.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
Total Estimated Annual Respondents:
(a) 1,586,815 covered entrants; and (b)
151,530 covered Wagner-Peyser/VETS
persons receiving services to be tracked
through individual data records.
Estimated Time for Response: 3.5
minutes per record.
Total Estimated Burden Hours:
155,539.
Total Estimated Cost Burden: $0.
Description: The primary data
collection and reporting requirements
related to this proposed rule are set
forth in § 1010.330(b) and call for
minimal data collection for covered
persons to be initiated at the point of
entry by those qualified job training
programs above a certain size threshold,
as specified in § 1010.330(a)(2). These
new data collection and reporting
requirements are specified in the ICR
that accompanies this NPRM and will
impact the four approved information
collections identified below. The
effective date(s) for the new reporting
requirements will be determined by the
application of criteria identified in the
ICR, in conjunction with the point in
time at which OMB approval of the ICR
is received. It is possible that the
effective date for application of the new
data collection and reporting
requirements for covered persons at the
point of entry will coincide with the
effective date for implementation of the
Workforce Investment Streamlined
Performance Reporting (WISPR) System.
In that case, only the WISPR System and
the SCSEP Performance Measurement
System will be impacted, because
WISPR will replace the other three
systems identified below.
§ 1010.330(b)—What are the
responsibilities of recipients to collect
and maintain data on covered and noncovered persons?
• 1205–0040: SCSEP Performance
Measurement System.
• 1205–0240: Labor Exchange
Reporting System (LERS).
• 1205–0392: Trade Act Participant
Report (TAPR).
• 1205–0420: WIA Management
Information and Reporting System.
A second data collection and
reporting requirement relates to this
proposed rule. It is based on the
provisions of § 1010.220, which require
funding recipients to agree to
implement priority of service as a
condition for the receipt of funds. It is
anticipated that this requirement will
impact the six approved information
collections identified below.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
48091
§ 1010.220—How are recipients
required to implement priority of
service?
• 1205–0219: Standard Job Corps
Request for Proposal and Related
Contractor Information Gathering.
• 1205–0275: Trade Adjustment
Assistance/NAFTA Financial Status/
Request for Funds Report.
• 1205–0398: TITLE: Planning
Guidance and Instructions for
Submission of the Strategic State Plan
and Plan Modifications for Title I of the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA).
• 1205–0407: State Unified Plan
Planning Guidance for State Unified
Plans and Unified Plan Modifications
Submitted Under Section 501 of the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA).
• 1205–0439: Workforce Investment
Act: National Emergency Grant (NEG)
Assistance—Application and Reporting
Procedures.
• 1205–0458: Generic Solicitation for
Grant Applications (SGA).
The Department intends that the
required revisions to the six information
collections listed above will take effect
when these information collections are
next approved, whether that approval
responds to a request for renewed
approval of an existing information
collection, or to a request for initial
approval of a new information
collection.
The third data collection and
reporting requirement that relates to this
proposed rule is based on the provisions
of § 1010.330(c), which require funding
recipients to collect data and report on
covered and non-covered persons
receiving services. It is anticipated that
this requirement will impact the 14
approved information collections
identified below. In most cases, the only
impact will be to insert new
specifications for existing data fields for
veterans and eligible spouses in these
reporting systems.
Section 1010.330(c)—What are the
responsibilities of recipients to collect
and maintain data on covered and noncovered persons?
• 1205–0025: Job Corps Application
Data.
• 1205–0353: Worker Profiling and
Reemployment Services Activities and
Worker Profiling and Reemployment
Outcomes.
• 1205–0371: Work Opportunity Tax
Credit (WOTC) and Welfare-to-Work
(WtW) Tax Credit.
• 1205–0417: One-Stop Workforce
Information Grant Plan and Annual
Performance Report.
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
48092
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
• 1205–0422: Financial and Program
Reporting and Performance Standards
System for Indian and Native American
Programs Under Title I, Section 166 of
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA).
• 1205–0425: Reporting and
Performance Standards System for
Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker
Programs Under Title I, Section 167 of
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA).
• 1205–0436: Quick Turnaround
Surveys on Workforce Investment Act
Implementation.
• 1205–0448: Employment and
Training Data Validation Requirement.
• 1205–0455: Prisoner Reentry
Initiative (PRI) Reporting System.
• 1205–0464: YouthBuild Reporting
System.
• 1205–0465: High Growth and
Community-Based Job Training Grants.
• 1225–0059: Job Accommodation
Network (JAN) Customer Satisfaction
Survey.
• 1230–0003: Employment Assistance
& Recruiting Network (EARN) Employer
and Provider Enrollment Form, and
Surveys.
• 1293–0009: VETS Manager’s Report
and SF–269A.
The Department intends that the
required revisions to the 14 information
collections listed above will take effect
when these information collections are
next approved, whether that approval
responds to a request for renewed
approval of an existing information
collection, or to a request for initial
approval of a new information
collection.
The Department notes that a Federal
agency cannot conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it is
approved by OMB under the PRA, and
displays a currently valid OMB control
number, and the public is not required
to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Also, notwithstanding
any other provisions of law, no person
shall be subject to penalty for failing to
comply with a collection of information
if the collection of information does not
display a currently valid OMB control
number. Comments submitted in
response to this notice will become a
matter of public record. Those wishing
to submit comments on the collections
of information contained in this
proposed rule are reminded that: (a) the
relevant documents can be obtained for
review from any one of the three sources
cited above; and, (b) comments should
be submitted to the e-mail address or to
the postal address for OMB’s Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA), also cited above.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
Executive Order 13132
The Department has reviewed this
proposed rule in accordance with
Executive Order 13132 regarding
federalism and has determined that it
does not have ‘‘federalism
implications.’’ The rule does not ‘‘have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This proposed
rule implements the priority of services
for qualified job training programs.
Although States are recipients of funds
for many qualified job training
programs, this proposed rule does not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States; it merely establishes certain
conditions on the receipt of program
funds. This proposed rule does nothing
to alter either the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, this
proposed rule does not have ‘‘federalism
implications.’’
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995,
this rule does not include any Federal
mandate that may result in increased
expenditures by State, local and tribal
governments, or by the private sector.
This proposed rule merely establishes
that recipients of qualified job training
funds must use some of those funds to
satisfy priority of service requirements.
As this proposed rule does not impose
any unfunded Federal mandate, the
UMRA is not implicated.
Executive Order 13045
Executive Order 13045 concerns the
protection of children from
environmental health risks and safety
risks. This proposed rule implements
the priority of service provisions for
qualified job training programs funded
by the Department. This proposed rule
has no impact on safety or health risks
to children.
Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175 addresses the
unique relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribal
governments. The order requires Federal
agencies to take certain actions when
regulations have ‘‘tribal implications.’’
Required actions include consulting
with Tribal Governments prior to
promulgating a regulation with tribal
implications and preparing a tribal
impact statement. The order defines
regulations as having ‘‘tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
implications’’ when they have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The Department has reviewed this
proposed rule and concludes that it
does not have tribal implications.
Although tribal governments are
recipients of some qualified job training
program funds, this proposed rule
merely establishes certain conditions on
the receipt of program funds. Indian
tribes will not even be required to
perform the new reporting duties
described in this proposed rule because
the programs they administer do not
serve an average of 1,000 covered
persons per year. The proposed rule
does nothing to affect either the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Therefore, this proposed rule does not
have tribal implications for purposes of
Executive Order 13175.
Environmental Impact Assessment
The Department has reviewed this
proposed rule in accordance with the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR part
1500), and the Department’s NEPA
procedures (29 CFR part 11). The
proposed rule will not have a significant
impact on the quality of the human
environment, and thus the Department
has not prepared an environmental
assessment or an environmental impact
statement.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, enacted as part of the Omnibus
Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act of
1999 (Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681),
requires the Department to assess the
impact of this rule on family well-being.
A rule that is determined to have a
negative affect on families must be
supported with an adequate rationale.
The Department has assessed this
proposed rule and has determined that
it will not have a negative effect on
families.
Privacy Act
The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C.
552a) provides safeguards to individuals
concerning their personal information
which the Government collects. The Act
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
requires certain actions by an agency
that collects information on individuals
when that information contains
personally identifying information such
as Social Security Numbers or names.
Because this proposed rule does not
require a new collection of personally
identifiable information, the privacy act
does not apply in this instance.
Executive Order 12630
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, because it does not involve
implementation of a policy with takings
implications.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been drafted
and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, and will not unduly burden the
Federal court system. The proposed
regulation has been written so as to
minimize litigation and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, and
has been reviewed carefully to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguities.
Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, because it will
not have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
Plain Language
The Department drafted this proposed
rule in plain language.
Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number
This proposed rule is not programspecific; rather it applies across a broad
spectrum of qualified job training
programs. Therefore, designation of a
listing in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance would not be
appropriate.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 1010
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Employment, Grant programs—Labor,
Veterans.
Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of
August 2008.
Charles S. Ciccolella,
Assistant Secretary, Veterans Employment
and Training Service.
For reasons stated in the preamble,
the Department proposes to amend 20
CFR chapter V by adding part 1010 to
read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
PART 1010—APPLICATION OF
PRIORITY OF SERVICE FOR COVERED
PERSONS
Subpart A—Purpose and Definitions
Sec.
1010.100 What is the purpose and scope of
this part?
1010.110 What definitions apply to this
part?
Subpart B—Understanding Priority of
Service
1010.200 What is priority of service?
1010.210 In which Department job training
programs do covered persons receive
priority of service?
1010.220 How are recipients required to
implement priority of service?
1010.230 In addition to the responsibilities
of all recipients, do States and political
subdivisions of States have any
particular responsibilities in
implementing priority of service?
1010.240 Will the Department be
monitoring for compliance with priority
of service?
1010.250 Can priority of service be waived?
Subpart C—Applying Priority of Service
1010.300 What processes are to be
implemented to identify covered
persons?
1010.310 How will priority of service be
applied?
1010.320 Will recipients be required to
collect information and report on
priority of service?
1010.330 What are the responsibilities of
recipients to collect and maintain data
on covered and non-covered persons?
Authority: Public Law 109–461 (Dec. 22,
2006), section 605 [38 U.S.C. 4215 Note]; 38
U.S.C. 4215.
Subpart A—Purpose and Definitions
§ 1010.100 What is the purpose and scope
of this part?
(a) Part 1010 contains the Department
regulations implementing priority of
service for covered persons. Priority of
service for covered persons is
authorized by section 2(a)(1) of JVA (38
U.S.C. 4215). These regulations fulfill
section 605 of the Veterans Benefits,
Health Care, and Information
Technology Act of 2006, Public Law
109–461 (Dec. 22, 2006), which requires
the Department to implement priority of
service via regulation.
(b) As provided in § 1010.210, this
part applies to all qualified job training
programs.
§ 1010.110
part?
What definitions apply to this
The following definitions apply to
this part:
Covered person as defined in section
2(a) of the JVA (38 U.S.C. 4215(a))
means a veteran or eligible spouse.
Department or DOL means the United
States Department of Labor, including
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
48093
its agencies and organizational units
and their representatives.
Eligible spouse as defined in section
2(a) of the JVA (38 U.S.C. 4215(a))
means the spouse of any of the
following:
(1) Any veteran who died of a serviceconnected disability;
(2) Any member of the Armed Forces
serving on active duty who, at the time
of application for the priority, is listed
in one or more of the following
categories and has been so listed for a
total of more than 90 days:
(i) Missing in action;
(ii) Captured in line of duty by a
hostile force; or
(iii) Forcibly detained or interned in
line of duty by a foreign government or
power;
(3) Any veteran who has a total
disability resulting from a serviceconnected disability, as evaluated by the
Department of Veterans Affairs;
(4) Any veteran who died while a
disability, as indicated in paragraph (3)
of this definition, was in existence.
Grant means an award of Federal
financial assistance by the Department
of Labor to an eligible recipient.
Jobs for Veterans Act (JVA) means
Public Law 107–288 (2002). Section 2(a)
of the JVA, codified at 38 U.S.C. 4215(a),
provides priority of service for covered
persons.
Non-covered person means any
individual who meets neither the
definition of ‘‘veteran,’’ as defined
below, nor the definition of ‘‘eligible
spouse’’ as defined above.
Qualified job training program means
any program or service for workforce
preparation, development, or delivery
that is directly funded, in whole or in
part, by the Department of Labor.
Recipient means an entity to which
federal financial assistance, in whole or
in part, is awarded directly from the
Department or through a sub-award for
any qualified job training program.
Secretary means the Secretary of the
Department of Labor.
Veteran means a person who served
in the active military, naval, or air
service, and who was discharged or
released therefrom under conditions
other than dishonorable, as specified in
38 U.S.C. 101(2).
Subpart B—Understanding Priority of
Service
§ 1010.200
What is priority of service?
(a) As defined in section 2(a) of the
JVA (38 U.S.C. 4215(a)) ‘‘priority of
service’’ means, with respect to any
qualified job training program, that a
covered person shall be given priority
over a non-covered person for the
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
48094
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
receipt of employment, training, and
placement services provided under that
program, notwithstanding any other
provision of the law.
(b) Priority in the context of providing
priority of service to veterans and other
covered persons in qualified job training
programs covered by this regulation
means the right to take precedence over
non-covered persons in obtaining
services. Depending on the type of
service or resource being provided,
taking precedence may mean:
(1) The covered person receives
access to the service or resource earlier
in time than the non-covered person; or
(2) If the service or resource is
limited, the covered person receives
access to the service or resource instead
of or before the non-covered person.
§ 1010.210 In which Department job
training programs do covered persons
receive priority of service?
(a) Priority of service applies to every
qualified job training program funded,
in whole or in part, by the Department,
including:
(1) Any such program or service that
uses technology to assist individuals to
access workforce development programs
(such as job and training opportunities,
labor market information, career
assessment tools, and related support
services); and
(2) Any such program or service
under the public employment service
system, One-Stop Career Centers, the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998, a
demonstration or other temporary
program; any workforce development
program targeted to specific groups; and
those programs implemented by States
or local service providers based on
Federal block grants administered by
the Department.
(b) The implementation of priority of
service does not change the intended
function of a program or service.
Covered persons must meet all statutory
eligibility and program requirements for
participation in order to receive priority
for a program or service.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 1010.220 How are recipients required to
implement priority of service?
(a) An agreement to implement
priority of service, as described in these
regulations and in any departmental
guidance, is a condition for receipt of all
Department job training program funds.
(b) All recipients are required to
ensure that priority of service is applied
by all sub-recipients of Department
funds. All program activities, including
those obtained through requests for
proposals, solicitations for grant awards,
sub-grants, contracts, sub-contracts, and
(where feasible) memoranda of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
understanding or other service
provision agreements, issued or
executed by qualified job training
program operators, must be
administered in compliance with
priority of service.
§ 1010.230 In addition to the
responsibilities of all recipients, do States
and political subdivisions of States have
any particular responsibilities in
implementing priority of service?
(a) Pursuant to their responsibility
under the Workforce Investment Act of
1998, States are required to address
priority of service in their
comprehensive strategic plan for the
State’s workforce investment system.
Specifically, States must develop
policies for the delivery of priority of
service by the State Workforce Agency
or Agencies, Local Workforce
Investment Boards, and One-Stop Career
Centers for all qualified job training
programs delivered through the State’s
workforce system. The policy or policies
must require that processes are in place
to ensure that covered persons are
identified at the point of entry and given
an opportunity to take full advantage of
priority of service. These processes shall
be undertaken to ensure that covered
persons are aware of:
(1) Their entitlement to priority of
service;
(2) The full array of employment,
training, and placement services
available under priority of service; and
(3) Any applicable eligibility
requirements for those programs and/or
services.
(b) The State’s policy or policies must
require Local Workforce Investment
Boards to develop and include in their
strategic local plan, policies
implementing priority of service for the
local One-Stop Career Centers and for
service delivery by local workforce
preparation and training providers.
These policies must establish processes
to ensure that covered persons are
identified at the point of entry so that
covered persons are able to take full
advantage of priority of service. These
processes shall ensure that covered
persons are aware of:
(1) Their entitlement to priority of
service;
(2) The full array of employment,
training, and placement services
available under priority of service; and
(3) Any applicable eligibility
requirements for those programs and/or
services.
§ 1010.240 Will the Department be
monitoring for compliance with priority of
service?
(a) The Department will monitor
recipients of funds for qualified job
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
training programs to ensure that covered
persons are made aware of and afforded
priority of service.
(b) Monitoring priority of service will
be performed jointly between the
Veterans’ Employment and Training
Service (VETS) and the DOL agency
responsible for the program’s
administration and oversight.
(c) A recipient’s failure to provide
priority of service to covered persons
will be handled in accordance with the
program’s established compliance
review processes. In addition to the
remedies available under the program’s
compliance review processes, a
recipient may be required to submit a
corrective action plan to correct such
failure.
§ 1010.250
waived?
Can priority of service be
No, priority of service cannot be
waived.
Subpart C—Applying Priority of
Service
§ 1010.300 What processes are to be
implemented to identify covered persons?
(a) Recipients of funds for qualified
job training programs must implement
processes to identify covered persons
who physically access service delivery
points or who access virtual service
delivery programs or Web sites in order
to provide covered persons with timely
and useful information on priority of
service at the point of entry. Point of
entry may include reception through a
One-Stop Career Center established
pursuant to the Workforce Investment
Act of 1998, as part of an application
process for a specific program, or
through any other method by which
covered persons express an interest in
receiving services, either in-person or
virtually.
(b) These processes must ensure that:
(1) Covered persons are identified at
the point of entry to allow covered
persons to take full advantage of priority
of service; and
(2) Covered persons are to be made
aware of:
(i) Their entitlement to priority of
service;
(ii) The full array of employment,
training, and placement services
available under priority of service; and
(iii) Any applicable eligibility
requirements for those programs and/or
services.
§ 1010.310
applied?
How will priority of service be
(a) Recipients of funds for qualified
job training programs must implement
processes in accordance with § 1010.300
to identify covered persons at the point
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
of entry, whether in person or virtual, so
the covered person can be notified of
their eligibility for priority of service.
Since qualified job training programs
may offer various types of services
including staff-assisted services as well
as self-services or informational
activities, recipients also must ensure
that priority of service is implemented
throughout the full array of services
provided to covered persons by the
qualified job training program.
(b) Three categories of qualified job
training programs affect the application
of priority of service: universal access,
discretionary targeting and statutory
targeting. To obtain priority, a covered
person must meet the statutory
eligibility requirement(s) applicable to
the specific program from which
services are sought. For those programs
that also have discretionary or statutory
priorities or preferences pursuant to a
federal statute or regulation, recipients
must coordinate providing priority of
service with applying those other
priorities, as prescribed in paragraphs
(b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section.
(1) Universal access programs operate
or deliver services to the public as a
whole; they do not target specific
groups. These programs are required to
provide priority of service to covered
persons.
(2) Discretionary targeting programs
focus on a particular group, or make
efforts to provide a certain level of
service to such a group, but do not
specifically mandate that the favored
group be served before other eligible
individuals. Whether these provisions
are found in a federal statute or
regulation, priority of service will apply.
Covered persons must receive the
highest priority for the program or
service, and non-covered persons within
the discretionary targeting will receive
priority over non-covered persons
outside the discretionary targeting.
(3) Statutory targeting programs are
programs derived from a federal
statutory mandate that requires a
priority or preference for a particular
group of individuals or requires
spending a certain portion of program
funds on a particular group of persons
receiving services. These are mandatory
priorities. Recipients must determine
each individual’s covered person status
and apply priority of service as
described below:
(i) Covered persons who meet the
mandatory priorities or spending
requirement or limitation must receive
the highest priority for the program or
service;
(ii) Non-covered persons within the
program’s mandatory priority or
spending requirement or limitation,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:26 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
must receive priority for the program or
service over covered persons outside the
program-specific mandatory priority or
spending requirement or limitation;
and,
(iii) Covered persons outside the
program-specific mandatory priority or
spending requirement or limitation
must receive priority for the program or
service over non-covered persons
outside the program-specific mandatory
priority or spending requirement or
limitation.
§ 1010.320 Will recipients be required to
collect information and report on priority of
service?
Yes. Every recipient of funds for
qualified job training programs must
collect such information, maintain such
records, and submit reports containing
such information and in such formats as
the Secretary may require related to the
provision of priority of service.
§ 1010.330 What are the responsibilities of
recipients to collect and maintain data on
covered and non-covered persons?
(a) General requirements. Recipients
must collect information in accordance
with instructions issued by the
Department.
(1) Recipients must collect two broad
categories of information:
(i) For the qualified job training
programs specified in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section, information must be
collected on covered persons from the
point of entry, as defined in
§ 1010.300(a), and as provided in
paragraph (b) of this section; and,
(ii) For all qualified job training
programs, including the programs
specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, information must be collected
on covered and non-covered persons
who receive services, as prescribed by
the respective qualified job training
programs, as provided in paragraph (c)
of this section.
(2) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of
this section, qualified job training
programs that served, at the national
level, 1,000 or more veterans per year
for the three most recent years of
program operations (currently the
Wagner-Peyser, WIA Adult, WIA
Dislocated Worker, WIA National
Emergency Grant, and Senior
Community Service Employment
Programs) must collect information and
report on covered entrants. The Trade
Adjustment Assistance Program must
collect information and report on
covered entrants on the effective date of
the next information collection
requirement applicable to that program,
whether that is for a renewal of an
existing approved information
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
48095
collection or for approval of a new
information collection.
(3) For purposes of this section,
covered persons at the point of entry are
referred to as ‘‘covered entrants.’’ This
group includes two further subgroups:
Veterans and eligible spouses as defined
in § 1010.110.
(b) Collection and maintenance of
data on covered entrants. In accordance
with instructions issued by the
Department, recipients of assistance for
the programs specified in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section must collect and
report individual record data for all
covered entrants from the point of entry.
(c) Collection and maintenance of
data on covered and non-covered
persons who receive services. In
accordance with instructions issued for
individual qualified job training
programs, all recipients must collect
and maintain data on covered and noncovered persons who receive services,
including individual record data for
those programs that require
establishment and submission of
individual records for persons receiving
services.
(1) The information to be collected
shall include, but is not limited to:
(i) The covered and non-covered
person status of all persons receiving
services;
(ii) The types of services provided to
covered and non-covered persons;
(iii) The dates that services were
received by covered and non-covered
persons; and
(iv) The employment outcomes
experienced by covered and noncovered persons receiving services.
(2)(i) Except as provided in paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section, for persons
receiving services, recipients must
apply the definitions set forth in
§ 1010.110 to distinguish covered from
non-covered persons receiving services
and, within covered persons, to
distinguish veterans from eligible
spouses.
(ii) Until qualified job training
programs adopt the definitions for
covered and non-covered persons set
forth at § 1010.110 through the
publication of requirements pursuant to
the Paperwork Reduction Act, recipients
must collect data on the services
provided to and the outcomes
experienced by veterans (however
defined) and non-veterans receiving
services in accord with regulations,
policies and currently approved
information collections.
(d) All information must be stored
and managed in a manner that ensures
confidentiality.
[FR Doc. E8–18869 Filed 8–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–79–P
E:\FR\FM\15AUP3.SGM
15AUP3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 159 (Friday, August 15, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48086-48095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18869]
[[Page 48085]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part IV
Department of Labor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Veterans' Employment and Training Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
20 CFR Part 1010
Priority of Service for Covered Persons; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 48086]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Veterans' Employment and Training Service
20 CFR Part 1010
RIN 1293-AA15
Priority of Service for Covered Persons
AGENCY: Veterans' Employment and Training Service, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Veterans' Employment and Training Service (VETS) of the
Department of Labor (Department or DOL) is proposing a rule to
implement priority of service in qualified job training programs
prescribed in section 2(a)(1) of the Jobs for Veterans Act (JVA). The
Department undertakes this rulemaking in accordance with section 605 of
the Veterans' Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of
2006, which requires the Department to implement priority of service
via regulation. The Department seeks comments on this proposed rule.
DATES: To ensure consideration, comments must be received on or before
October 14, 2008. Comments received after that date will be considered
to the extent possible.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) 1293-AA15, by either one of the two following
methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the Web site instructions for submitting comments.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Written comments, disk, and
CD-ROM submissions may be mailed or delivered by hand delivery/courier
to Gordon Burke, Director, Office of Grants and Transition Programs,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S-1312,
Washington, DC 20210.
Instructions: Please submit one copy of your comments by only one
method. All submissions received must include the agency name, as well
as RIN 1293-AA15.
Please be advised that the Department will post all comments
received on www.regulations.gov without making any change to the
comments, including any personal information provided. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is the Federal e-rulemaking portal and all
comments posted there are available and accessible to the public.
Therefore, the Department recommends that commenters safeguard their
personal information such as Social Security Numbers, personal
addresses, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses included in their
comments. It is the responsibility of the commenter to safeguard his or
her information.
Also, please note that due to security concerns, postal mail
delivery in Washington, DC, may be delayed. Therefore, in order to
ensure that comments receive full consideration, the Department
encourages the public to submit comments via the Internet as indicated
above.
Docket: The Department will make all the comments it receives
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the
above address. If you need assistance to review the comments, the
Department will provide you with appropriate aids such as readers or
print magnifiers. The Department will make copies of the proposed rule
available, upon request, in large print or electronic file on computer
disk. The Department will consider providing the proposed rule in other
formats upon request. To schedule an appointment to review the comments
and/or obtain the proposed rule in an alternate format, contact the
office of Gordon Burke at (202) 693-4740 (VOICE) (this is not a toll-
free number) or (202) 693-4760 (TTY/TDD). You may also contact Mr.
Burke's office at the address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Langley, Chief, Division of
Grant Programs, Veterans' Employment and Training Service, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S-1312,
Washington, DC 20210, Langley.Pamela@dol.gov, (202) 693-4708 (this is
not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The preamble to this proposed rule is
organized as follows:
I. Background--provides a brief description of the development of
the proposed rule.
II. Section-by-Section Review of the Proposed Rule--summarizes and
discusses proposed regulations.
III. Administrative Information--sets forth the applicable
regulatory requirements.
I. Background
On November 7, 2002, President Bush signed the Jobs for Veterans
Act, Public Law 107-288 (Nov. 7, 2002). One provision of the JVA,
codified at 38 U.S.C. Section 4215, creates a priority of service
requirement for covered persons in Department qualified job training
programs. Since the passage of the Act, the Department has provided
policy guidance to the workforce investment system regarding the
implementation of priority of service, including the Department's
Employment and Training Administration (ETA) issuance of Training and
Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 05-03 in September 2003. TEGL No.
05-03 applies to a large majority of the job training programs impacted
by priority of service. In December 2006, President Bush signed the
Veterans' Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006
(Pub. L. 109-461). That law requires the Department to issue
regulations regarding the implementation of priority of service. The
purpose of this notice is to propose those regulations.
The JVA provides that veterans and eligible spouses of veterans (as
defined in Sec. 1010.110) are identified as covered persons and are
entitled to priority over non-covered persons for the receipt of
employment, training, and placement services provided under new or
existing qualified job training programs, notwithstanding any other
provision of the law. At 38 U.S.C. 4215(a)(2), qualified job training
programs are defined as ``any workforce preparation, development or
delivery program or service that is directly funded, in whole or in
part, by the Department.'' Currently, such programs are offered by many
agencies within the Department, including, but not limited to, ETA,
VETS, the Women's Bureau, and the Office of Disability Employment
Policy (ODEP).
JVA, and the priority of service it requires, is an important
acknowledgment of the sacrifices of the men and women who have served
in the U.S. armed forces. The Department's strategic vision for
priority of service to covered persons honors veterans and eligible
spouses of veterans as our ``heroes at home'' and envisions that DOL-
funded employment and training programs, including the publicly-funded
workforce investment system, will identify, inform and deliver
comprehensive services to covered persons as part of strategic
workforce development activities across the country. Veterans possess
unique attributes and contribute greatly in the workplace. They are an
important source of highly skilled and experienced talent and play an
important role in regional workforce development strategies. They are
highly sought after by employers and they make excellent employees.
Implementation of priority of service is designed to provide covered
persons with clear entry points into high-growth, high wage civilian
jobs and easily accessible post-secondary education and training to
support veterans' advancement along career pathways which will benefit
regional economies.
One-Stop Career Centers are the delivery point for a significant
[[Page 48087]]
percentage of qualified job training programs and services covered by
the JVA and are required to implement priority of service. All One-Stop
Career Centers should have clear strategies for providing veterans and
eligible spouses of veterans with the highest quality of service at
every phase of services offered. This can range from basic functions of
the One-Stop System, such as assistance with job search and
identification of needed skills to more customized initiatives such as
creating career pathways, with corresponding competency assessments and
training opportunities, which allow covered persons to advance their
careers in high growth sectors of the economy. The Department expects
that the One-Stop System will draw on all available resources to
support the reemployment needs of covered persons.
Veterans and their spouses have specific needs and concerns that
can be addressed as DOL-funded employment and training programs develop
strategies for serving them. When military service has ended, a major
concern for many veterans is getting a good job. Combat veterans may
experience difficulties both in finding employment and in readjusting
to civilian work environments. DOL-funded employment and training
programs should work with employers to ensure that the value a veteran
brings to the table is understood and to address any concerns that
employers may have about hiring veterans. Those veterans who have
sustained injuries or illnesses as a result of their military service
may require additional support in developing skills and securing
employment. DOL, the Department of Defense and the Department of
Veterans Affairs are collaborating in closely monitoring the
rehabilitation of wounded and injured veterans so that their readiness
for employment can be assessed and appropriate preparations for
civilian employment can be made. Upon achieving job-ready status, these
``heroes at home'' should be immediately provided the full array of
employment and training services to ensure that they make a successful
transition into a civilian career.
Priority of service ensures that covered persons receive priority
employment and job training services that will effectively integrate
them into the economy. It does not change a program's intended
functions; covered persons still need to meet all statutory eligibility
and program requirements for participation. Some DOL-funded employment
and training programs have only general program eligibility
requirements and do not statutorily target specific groups. These
programs require only a straightforward implementation of priority of
service. However, some DOL-funded employment and training programs do
carry existing statutory targeting provisions that must be taken into
account when applying priority of service. The purpose of this proposed
rule is to articulate how priority of service is to be applied across
all existing and new qualified job training programs.
II. Section-by-Section Review of the Proposed Rule
Subpart A--Purpose and Definitions
What is the purpose and scope of this part? (Sec. 1010.100)
Section 1010.100 briefly describes and supplies the statutory
context for these regulations. The purpose of the regulations is to
implement priority of service for veterans and eligible spouses of
veterans, collectively identified as covered persons. These regulations
apply to all workforce preparation, development or delivery programs
funded in whole or in part by the Department. These regulations
implement the priority of service provision of the JVA (38 U.S.C. 4215)
as required by the Veterans' Benefits, Health Care, and Information
Technology Act of 2006, Public Law 109-461 (Dec. 22, 2006).
What definitions apply to this part? (Sec. 1010.110)
The definitions in this section are provided to assist in
understanding priority of service, its implementation and corresponding
requirements. For the most part, these terms incorporate definitions
contained in the Jobs for Veterans Act. The term ``veteran'' is based
on the definition in 38 U.S.C. 101(2) and is defined as ``a person who
served in the active military, naval, or air service, and who was
discharged or released therefrom under conditions other than
dishonorable.'' As provided in Sec. 1010.330(c)(2)(i), this will
result in uniformity in the application of and in the reporting on
priority of service for veterans.
Subpart B--Understanding Priority of Service
What is priority of service? (Sec. 1010.200)
Priority of service entitles covered persons, including veterans
and eligible spouses of veterans who are otherwise eligible for DOL
qualified job training programs, to receive priority access to programs
or services over non-covered persons. It is important to emphasize that
covered persons must meet a program's statutory eligibility
requirements in order to obtain priority of service in the program.
To carry out these objectives, priority of service requires that
covered persons take precedence over non-covered persons in obtaining
DOL-funded services. Section 1010.200 provides that covered persons
receive access to the service or resource earlier in time than non-
covered persons; or if the service or resource is limited, covered
persons receive access to the service or resource instead of or before
non-covered persons.
In which Department job training programs do covered persons receive
priority of service (Sec. 1010.210)?
This section stipulates that priority of service applies to every
workforce preparation, development, or delivery program or service that
is directly funded in whole or in part by the Department. Priority of
service is intended to apply to all such programs currently in
operation, as well as all new such programs that come into existence in
the future. The implementation of priority of service is not meant to
change the intended function of a program or service.
The Department funds a broad range of programs and services that
are affected by priority of service, including, but not limited to:
Wagner-Peyser funded employment services; the Trade Adjustment
Assistance Program; Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs funded under
the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-220, Aug. 7, 1998)
(WIA); WIA Youth Formula Funded Programs, WIA national programs;
Community Based Job Training Grants; Job Corps; the Veterans' Workforce
Investment Program; Office of Disability Employment Programs; Pilot and
Demonstration Grants; discretionary grants such as those using H-1B
funds; and future grant formula or discretionary grants. As new
workforce preparation, development, or delivery programs or services
funded in whole or in part by the Department are developed, they will
also be covered by priority of service.
How are recipients required to implement priority of service? (Sec.
1010.220)
Under paragraph (a) of this section, all recipients of DOL funding
for the administration and delivery of qualified job training programs
are required to agree to implement priority of service as a condition
for receipt of any Department funds for existing and new
[[Page 48088]]
programs. As part of this agreement, funding recipients must provide
the Department with information on how priority of service will be
implemented. The agreement may be executed in a variety of ways,
depending on the program. For example, the Department may require the
agreement as part of the terms of formal grant award documents and/or
through program governance documents, such as strategic plans and State
workforce investment plans submitted under the Workforce Investment Act
of 1998.
Under paragraph (b) of this section, it is the responsibility of
the funding recipient to ensure that any sub-recipients of funds
implement priority of service. As such, funding recipients should
include priority of service and its associated data collection and
reporting requirements in all requests for proposals, solicitations for
grant awards, sub-grants, sub-contracts, or other mechanisms utilized
to define service delivery strategies using DOL funding, including
(where feasible) memoranda of understanding or other service delivery
agreements.
Do States and political subdivisions of States have any additional
responsibilities in implementing priority of service that go beyond
what is expected of recipients? (Sec. 1010.230)
Because of the importance of their role in ensuring that priority
of service for covered persons is carried out throughout the One-Stop
Delivery System, both States and local workforce investment areas have
particular responsibilities for planning and establishing policies for
the delivery of priority of service throughout the workforce investment
system. States are required to address priority of service in their
comprehensive strategic plans, and they are also required to ensure
that Local Workforce Investment Boards address priority of service in
their strategic plans. These plans should identify the processes that a
State's workforce system will follow to identify covered persons at the
point of entry so that covered persons can take full advantage of
priority of service. State entities and political subdivisions of
states are required to ensure that covered persons are made aware of
the programs and the benefits conveyed by priority of service and that
covered persons understand: (a) Their entitlement to priority of
service; (b) the full array of employment, training, and placement
services available under priority service, and (c) any applicable
eligibility requirements for those programs or services. It is the
responsibility of states to ensure that state and local policies are in
place to fulfill these requirements.
Will the Department be monitoring for compliance with priority of
service? (Sec. 1010.240)
The Department is committed to ensuring full and proper
implementation of priority of service across the nation. Therefore, the
Department will monitor and evaluate recipients of funds for qualified
job and training programs to ensure that covered persons are made aware
of and are afforded priority of service. The responsibility for
monitoring priority of service will be shared jointly between VETS and
the DOL agency responsible for administration and oversight of the
program. At the regional level, VETS staff will coordinate monitoring
reviews and validation visits with the appropriate federal official
with comparable responsibility for the qualified job training program.
Monitoring and evaluation will include collecting information
indicating that covered persons are afforded priority of service in
qualified job training programs, and ensuring that covered persons are
made aware of priority of service at the point of entry and are
afforded its benefits. The processes to address the inability of
grantees to perform programmatic requirements, such as the application
of priority of service, vary by program. At a minimum, if a recipient
is found to not be in compliance with the requirement to provide
priority of service to covered persons, the recipient will be required
to submit a corrective action plan.
Can priority of service be waived? (Sec. 1010.250)
In accordance with 38 U.S.C. 4215(a)(3), priority of service will
be applied for covered persons in all qualified programs and services
``notwithstanding any other provision of law'' and cannot be waived.
Subpart C--Applying Priority of Service for Covered Persons
What processes are to be implemented to identify covered persons?
(Sec. 1010.300)
To ensure complete implementation of priority of service,
recipients of funds for qualified job training programs must have
procedures in place to identify covered persons as quickly as possible
in order to promptly inform them about their priority of service
benefits, regardless of whether those benefits are being delivered in
person or over the Web. As described in greater detail in conjunction
with the review of Sec. 1010.330, DOL has identified ``point of
entry'' as the point at which customers first come into contact with
DOL-funded employment and training programs. Points of entry may
include reception through a One-Stop Career Center established pursuant
to the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, as part of an application
process for a specific program, or through any other method by which
covered persons express an interest in receiving services, either in-
person or virtually. These processes are to ensure that:
(1) Covered persons are identified at the point of entry to allow
them to take the fullest advantage of priority of service; and
(2) To ensure covered persons understand:
(a) Their entitlement to priority of service,
(b) The full array of employment and training services available
under priority of service, and
(c) Any eligibility requirements the covered person must meet in
order to gain entry into the program or to be provided services by the
program.
These procedures must ensure that covered persons are identified at
the point of entry so that they have the opportunity to take advantage
of priority of service. For example, a program with intake procedures
must ascertain during intake whether the applicant is a covered person
so that the covered person can be afforded priority during the receipt
of all applicable subsequent services.
Because of the broad scope of qualified job training programs, a
single procedure for all programs is not feasible and will not be
specified. Instead, each program will need to develop those procedures
that best fit within that program's context and current client flow
process.
How will priority of service be applied? (Sec. 1010.310)
As mentioned above, veterans must meet program eligibility
requirements in order to obtain priority. This section discusses the
different ways that programs may target groups of eligible individuals
and how such targeting interacts with the priority of service. Some
DOL-funded qualified job training programs have only general program
eligibility requirements and do not statutorily target specific groups.
For these programs, implementing priority of service for covered
persons is relatively straightforward. However, DOL also administers a
number of programs that have existing federal statutory or
discretionary targeting provisions that prioritize certain
[[Page 48089]]
population groups. The Department is using this rule-making opportunity
to clarify and codify how such priorities should be balanced when
implementing priority of service in those programs with federal
statutory priorities. The veterans' priority of service will always
take precedence over state- or locally-imposed priorities and
preferences.
Many qualified job training programs also provide more than one
phase of service. For example, within the One-Stop Career Center, a
continuum of services may be available, ranging from self-service and
information to career counseling and training, depending upon the needs
of the customer. It is important to note that covered persons must be
given priority of service throughout this continuum of services.
Identifying covered persons at the point of entry is a means of
ensuring that covered persons have access to and are afforded priority
in receiving the full array of services available throughout the
different phases of service delivery.
For the purposes of implementing priority of service, all DOL-
funded qualified job training programs fall into one of three broad
categories: (1) Programs whose eligibility requirements do not target
specific groups (universal access); (2) programs with discretionary
targeting of specific groups pursuant to a federal statute or
regulation; (3) programs with statutory targeting of specific groups
pursuant to a federal statute or regulation. For each of these three
categories, instructions for applying priority of service are provided
below:
1. Programs whose eligibility requirements do not target specific
groups (universal access):
Some DOL-funded qualified programs, such as Wagner-Peyser
employment services, are available to eligible individuals from the
general population as a whole. For these programs, funding recipients
must identify covered persons and give all covered persons priority of
service over non-covered persons for program services.
2. Programs with discretionary targeting of specific groups
pursuant to a federal statute or regulation:
Some DOL-funded qualified job training programs are designed by
statute or regulation to focus on a particular group, or to make
efforts to provide a certain level of service to such a group, but such
focus is optional or discretionary. In that case, priority of service
takes precedence over the discretionary priority. This means that
funding recipients are required to provide covered persons the highest
priority over non-covered persons. Non-covered persons within the
discretionary area of focus would then receive priority over non-
covered persons outside the discretionary area of focus. The
discretionary targeting will still remain consistent with the federal
statutory and/or regulatory provision(s) governing the discretionary
targeting.
3. Programs with statutory targeting pursuant to a federal statute
or regulation:
Some qualified programs have mandatory priorities or priorities
required by federal law. These targeting provisions mandate priority or
preference for a particular group of individuals, such as the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA) Adult Program (which requires, by statute, that
priority for intensive and training services be given to recipients of
public assistance and other low-income individuals, when funds
allocated to a local area are limited) or require spending a certain
portion of program funds on a particular group of persons receiving
services, such as the WIA Youth Program (which requires that at least
30% of funds be spent on out-of-school youth). For these programs
containing a federal statutory priority, funding recipients should
implement priority of service in the following order: (1) Covered
persons who meet the mandatory priorities or spending requirement or
limitation would receive the highest priority for the program; (2) Non-
covered persons within the program's mandatory priorities would receive
preference before covered persons outside the program's mandatory
priorities; and (3) Covered persons outside the program's mandatory
priorities would receive priority over any non-covered persons outside
the program's mandatory priorities.
Will recipients be required to collect information and report on
priority of service? (Sec. 1010.320)
Yes, recipients of funds will be required to collect information
and report on priority of service. JVA requires the Department to
evaluate: (1) Whether covered persons are receiving priority of
service; (2) whether covered persons are being fully served by
qualified job training programs; and (3) whether the representation of
covered persons in such programs is in proportion to the incidence of
representation of covered persons in the labor market. The data to be
collected and maintained, as described in Sec. 1010.330, will play a
direct role in enabling the Department to fulfill the statutory
responsibilities of evaluating whether covered persons are receiving
priority of service and are being fully served by qualified job
training programs, and whether the representation of covered persons in
such programs is in proportion to the incidence of representation of
covered persons in the labor market. In addition, by calling covered
persons to the attention of program staff at the point of entry, the
requirement to collect data on covered persons is expected to reinforce
the provision of timely information to covered persons about their
right to priority, about available services and about applicable
eligibility requirements, as required by Sec. 1010.300.
What are the responsibilities of recipients to collect and maintain
data on covered and non-covered persons? (Sec. 1010.330)
Each recipient of funds must collect data and maintain records that
indicate covered person status to determine whether the funding
recipient is providing priority of service as required by the
Secretary. This regulation is accompanied by an Information Collection
Request (ICR) that identifies the initial set of requirements. Those
requirements are to be implemented for selected qualified job training
programs in coordination with the approval of the ICR, with the
expectation of implementing those requirements on July 1 of the
subsequent program year. Some qualified job training programs are not
included in the ICR that accompanies this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM). For each of those programs, the reporting requirements related
to priority of service will be identified as part of that program's
periodic renewal of approval for an existing information collection or
as part of that program's request for a new information collection,
whichever first follows the approval of the ICR that accompanies this
NPRM. VETS will review information collection requirements for programs
not included in the initial ICR to ensure they meet the reporting
requirements for priority of service.
In developing information collection and reporting requirements,
the Department has taken into consideration the broad scope of programs
to which these reporting requirements will apply. The Department also
considered the fact that priority of service addresses processes
experienced by customers, both covered and non-covered, before they
receive services. In designing its approach to data collection and
reporting on priority of service, DOL identified ``point of entry'' as
the point at which customers first come into contact with DOL-funded
employment and training programs. Since customers
[[Page 48090]]
can make initial contact with these programs in a wide variety of ways,
point of entry embraces a variety of situations. For example, some
customers first contact One-Stop Career Centers, while others apply
directly for specific DOL-funded employment and training programs. In
either of those cases, customers also may make their initial contacts
at physical locations or by remotely accessing electronic resources. In
conjunction with the identification of point of entry, DOL also
designated customers at this stage as ``entrants,'' who can be either
covered or non-covered.
In assessing the available options for measuring priority of
service, the Department carefully considered the benefits that would be
derived and the burdens that would be imposed if data were collected
and reported on both covered and non-covered entrants. While that would
have allowed DOL to compare the rates of entry to services for both
groups, DOL concluded that requiring data collection and reporting for
non-covered entrants would be disproportionately burdensome to both
workforce professionals and their customers, the overwhelming majority
of whom are not covered persons. Specifically, historical data on
veteran participation suggest that non-covered entrants will represent
over four-fifths of all entrants. Therefore, the Department has
determined that entrant data collection and reporting will be
restricted to covered entrants.
Similarly, DOL considered requiring entrant data collection for all
qualified job training programs. In that case also, an assessment of
the trade-offs between the benefits and the burdens for programs of
different sizes indicated that data collection and reporting on covered
entrants should be restricted to six major workforce programs that
historically surpassed a ``threshold'' level of veteran participation.
The threshold level identified is participation of 1,000 or more
veteran participants per year, on average over the prior three years.
Of the nine major workforce programs included in the Annual Report on
veterans' employment, the six programs above the threshold level
accounted for 99.9% of the veteran participants. In light of the
expected concentration of covered entrants in those six programs, DOL
has determined that data collection and reporting on covered entrants
will be restricted to those six programs (Wagner-Peyser, WIA Adult, WIA
Dislocated Worker, WIA National Emergency Grant, Senior Community
Service Employment, and Trade Adjustment Assistance Programs).
All funding recipients also must collect and maintain data on
covered and non-covered persons who receive services (also known as
`participants'). The information to be collected may include, but is
not limited to: (1) The covered and non-covered person status of all
persons receiving services; (2) the types of services provided to
covered and non-covered persons; (3) the dates in which services were
received by covered and non-covered persons; and (4) the employment
outcomes experienced by covered and non-covered persons receiving
services. In collecting data on the services provided to and the
outcomes experiences by persons receiving services, funding recipients
must apply the definitions set forth in Sec. 1010.110 to distinguish
covered from non-covered persons receiving services and, within covered
persons, to distinguish veterans from eligible spouses.
III. Administrative Information
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Executive Order 13272, and Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. Chapter 6, requires
the Department to evaluate the economic impact of this proposed rule
with regard to small entities. The RFA defines small entities to
include small businesses, small organizations including not-for-profit
organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. The Department
must determine whether the proposed rule imposes a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of such small entities.
The Department has determined that there is no significant economic
impact resulting from this NPRM. The JVA mandates that veterans receive
priority of service in all qualified job training programs. The purpose
of this NPRM is to implement the JVA's priority of service requirement.
It defines the program and reporting requirements for ongoing programs
funded by the Department (and any new programs created in the future)
and administered by funding recipients. The priority of service
provisions in the JVA do not create any new job training programs;
rather, the programs affected by the priority of service are ongoing.
The proposed rule requires funding recipients to do certain things,
such as implement processes to identify covered persons at the point of
entry and report on priority of service. However, the Department funds
these programs and the funds are meant to include such activities as
administration and reporting. Although certain funding recipients that
operate qualified job training programs may be small entities, the
Department certifies that this NPRM does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
provisions of the RFA and also under the provisions of Executive Order
13272.
Finally, the Department has also determined that this rule is not a
``major rule'' for purposes of The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8, requires
agencies to take certain actions when a ``major rule'' is promulgated.
SBREFA defines a ``major rule'' as one that has or will likely to
result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices for, among other things, state or
local government agencies; or in significant and adverse effects on the
U.S. business climate. For the reasons already discussed, this proposed
rule will not have any significant financial impact. Accordingly, none
of the definitions of ``major rule'' apply in this instance.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 requires that for each ``significant
regulatory action'' proposed by the Department, the Department conduct
an assessment of the proposed regulatory action and provide the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) with the proposed regulation and the
requisite assessment prior to publishing the regulation. A significant
regulatory action is defined to include an action that will have an
annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, as well as an
action that raises a novel legal or policy issue.
The priority of service implemented by this proposed rule will not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, for the
reasons outlined above. While much of the proposed rule is consistent
with current DOL policy, certain portions may raise novel policy
issues. Accordingly, OMB has reviewed this proposed rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., include minimizing the paperwork burden on
affected entities. The PRA requires certain actions before an agency
can adopt or revise the collection of information, including publishing
a summary of the collection of information and a brief description of
the need for and proposed use of the information.
The Department hereby announces that the collections of information
[[Page 48091]]
contained in this proposed rule, and identified as such, have been
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with section 3507(d) of the PRA. A copy of this
submission, with applicable supporting documentation, a description of
the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated
total burden, may be obtained at https://www.doleta.gov/OMBCN/
OMBControlNumber.cfm or from the RegInfo.gov Web site at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain or by contacting Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer, on 202-693-4129 (this is not a
toll-free number); e-mail: king.darrin@dol.gov.
The Department invites comments on the collections of information
contained in this proposed rule. Comments may be submitted by e-mail to
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. Comments also may be sent to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503;
Attention: Desk Officer for the Employment and Training Administration.
Although comments may be submitted through October 14, 2008, OMB
requests that comments be received within 30 days of publication of the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to ensure their consideration. In order
to ensure the appropriate consideration, comments should reference the
OMB Control Number: 1205-0NEW. The OMB is particularly interested in
comments that:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Type of Review: Request for New Collection.
Title of the Collection: Application for Priority of Service Data
Collection.
OMB Control Number: 1205-0NEW.
Total Estimated Annual Respondents: (a) 1,586,815 covered entrants;
and (b) 151,530 covered Wagner-Peyser/VETS persons receiving services
to be tracked through individual data records.
Estimated Time for Response: 3.5 minutes per record.
Total Estimated Burden Hours: 155,539.
Total Estimated Cost Burden: $0.
Description: The primary data collection and reporting requirements
related to this proposed rule are set forth in Sec. 1010.330(b) and
call for minimal data collection for covered persons to be initiated at
the point of entry by those qualified job training programs above a
certain size threshold, as specified in Sec. 1010.330(a)(2). These new
data collection and reporting requirements are specified in the ICR
that accompanies this NPRM and will impact the four approved
information collections identified below. The effective date(s) for the
new reporting requirements will be determined by the application of
criteria identified in the ICR, in conjunction with the point in time
at which OMB approval of the ICR is received. It is possible that the
effective date for application of the new data collection and reporting
requirements for covered persons at the point of entry will coincide
with the effective date for implementation of the Workforce Investment
Streamlined Performance Reporting (WISPR) System. In that case, only
the WISPR System and the SCSEP Performance Measurement System will be
impacted, because WISPR will replace the other three systems identified
below.
Sec. 1010.330(b)--What are the responsibilities of recipients to
collect and maintain data on covered and non-covered persons?
1205-0040: SCSEP Performance Measurement System.
1205-0240: Labor Exchange Reporting System (LERS).
1205-0392: Trade Act Participant Report (TAPR).
1205-0420: WIA Management Information and Reporting
System.
A second data collection and reporting requirement relates to this
proposed rule. It is based on the provisions of Sec. 1010.220, which
require funding recipients to agree to implement priority of service as
a condition for the receipt of funds. It is anticipated that this
requirement will impact the six approved information collections
identified below.
Sec. 1010.220--How are recipients required to implement priority of
service?
1205-0219: Standard Job Corps Request for Proposal and
Related Contractor Information Gathering.
1205-0275: Trade Adjustment Assistance/NAFTA Financial
Status/Request for Funds Report.
1205-0398: TITLE: Planning Guidance and Instructions for
Submission of the Strategic State Plan and Plan Modifications for Title
I of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA).
1205-0407: State Unified Plan Planning Guidance for State
Unified Plans and Unified Plan Modifications Submitted Under Section
501 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA).
1205-0439: Workforce Investment Act: National Emergency
Grant (NEG) Assistance--Application and Reporting Procedures.
1205-0458: Generic Solicitation for Grant Applications
(SGA).
The Department intends that the required revisions to the six
information collections listed above will take effect when these
information collections are next approved, whether that approval
responds to a request for renewed approval of an existing information
collection, or to a request for initial approval of a new information
collection.
The third data collection and reporting requirement that relates to
this proposed rule is based on the provisions of Sec. 1010.330(c),
which require funding recipients to collect data and report on covered
and non-covered persons receiving services. It is anticipated that this
requirement will impact the 14 approved information collections
identified below. In most cases, the only impact will be to insert new
specifications for existing data fields for veterans and eligible
spouses in these reporting systems.
Section 1010.330(c)--What are the responsibilities of recipients to
collect and maintain data on covered and non-covered persons?
1205-0025: Job Corps Application Data.
1205-0353: Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services
Activities and Worker Profiling and Reemployment Outcomes.
1205-0371: Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) and Welfare-
to-Work (WtW) Tax Credit.
1205-0417: One-Stop Workforce Information Grant Plan and
Annual Performance Report.
[[Page 48092]]
1205-0422: Financial and Program Reporting and Performance
Standards System for Indian and Native American Programs Under Title I,
Section 166 of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA).
1205-0425: Reporting and Performance Standards System for
Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Programs Under Title I, Section 167 of
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA).
1205-0436: Quick Turnaround Surveys on Workforce
Investment Act Implementation.
1205-0448: Employment and Training Data Validation
Requirement.
1205-0455: Prisoner Reentry Initiative (PRI) Reporting
System.
1205-0464: YouthBuild Reporting System.
1205-0465: High Growth and Community-Based Job Training
Grants.
1225-0059: Job Accommodation Network (JAN) Customer
Satisfaction Survey.
1230-0003: Employment Assistance & Recruiting Network
(EARN) Employer and Provider Enrollment Form, and Surveys.
1293-0009: VETS Manager's Report and SF-269A.
The Department intends that the required revisions to the 14
information collections listed above will take effect when these
information collections are next approved, whether that approval
responds to a request for renewed approval of an existing information
collection, or to a request for initial approval of a new information
collection.
The Department notes that a Federal agency cannot conduct or
sponsor a collection of information unless it is approved by OMB under
the PRA, and displays a currently valid OMB control number, and the
public is not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Also, notwithstanding
any other provisions of law, no person shall be subject to penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of information if the collection of
information does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will become a matter of
public record. Those wishing to submit comments on the collections of
information contained in this proposed rule are reminded that: (a) the
relevant documents can be obtained for review from any one of the three
sources cited above; and, (b) comments should be submitted to the e-
mail address or to the postal address for OMB's Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), also cited above.
Executive Order 13132
The Department has reviewed this proposed rule in accordance with
Executive Order 13132 regarding federalism and has determined that it
does not have ``federalism implications.'' The rule does not ``have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This
proposed rule implements the priority of services for qualified job
training programs. Although States are recipients of funds for many
qualified job training programs, this proposed rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on the States; it merely establishes certain
conditions on the receipt of program funds. This proposed rule does
nothing to alter either the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
this proposed rule does not have ``federalism implications.''
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995,
this rule does not include any Federal mandate that may result in
increased expenditures by State, local and tribal governments, or by
the private sector. This proposed rule merely establishes that
recipients of qualified job training funds must use some of those funds
to satisfy priority of service requirements. As this proposed rule does
not impose any unfunded Federal mandate, the UMRA is not implicated.
Executive Order 13045
Executive Order 13045 concerns the protection of children from
environmental health risks and safety risks. This proposed rule
implements the priority of service provisions for qualified job
training programs funded by the Department. This proposed rule has no
impact on safety or health risks to children.
Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175 addresses the unique relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribal governments. The order requires
Federal agencies to take certain actions when regulations have ``tribal
implications.'' Required actions include consulting with Tribal
Governments prior to promulgating a regulation with tribal implications
and preparing a tribal impact statement. The order defines regulations
as having ``tribal implications'' when they have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The Department has reviewed this proposed rule and concludes that
it does not have tribal implications. Although tribal governments are
recipients of some qualified job training program funds, this proposed
rule merely establishes certain conditions on the receipt of program
funds. Indian tribes will not even be required to perform the new
reporting duties described in this proposed rule because the programs
they administer do not serve an average of 1,000 covered persons per
year. The proposed rule does nothing to affect either the relationship
or the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. Therefore, this proposed rule does not
have tribal implications for purposes of Executive Order 13175.
Environmental Impact Assessment
The Department has reviewed this proposed rule in accordance with
the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR part 1500), and the Department's NEPA
procedures (29 CFR part 11). The proposed rule will not have a
significant impact on the quality of the human environment, and thus
the Department has not prepared an environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, enacted as part of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat.
2681), requires the Department to assess the impact of this rule on
family well-being. A rule that is determined to have a negative affect
on families must be supported with an adequate rationale. The
Department has assessed this proposed rule and has determined that it
will not have a negative effect on families.
Privacy Act
The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) provides safeguards to
individuals concerning their personal information which the Government
collects. The Act
[[Page 48093]]
requires certain actions by an agency that collects information on
individuals when that information contains personally identifying
information such as Social Security Numbers or names. Because this
proposed rule does not require a new collection of personally
identifiable information, the privacy act does not apply in this
instance.
Executive Order 12630
This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights, because it does not involve implementation of a policy
with takings implications.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, and will not unduly burden
the Federal court system. The proposed regulation has been written so
as to minimize litigation and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, and has been reviewed carefully to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguities.
Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because
it will not have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
Plain Language
The Department drafted this proposed rule in plain language.
Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
This proposed rule is not program-specific; rather it applies
across a broad spectrum of qualified job training programs. Therefore,
designation of a listing in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
would not be appropriate.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 1010
Employment, Grant programs--Labor, Veterans.
Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of August 2008.
Charles S. Ciccolella,
Assistant Secretary, Veterans Employment and Training Service.
For reasons stated in the preamble, the Department proposes to
amend 20 CFR chapter V by adding part 1010 to read as follows:
PART 1010--APPLICATION OF PRIORITY OF SERVICE FOR COVERED PERSONS
Subpart A--Purpose and Definitions
Sec.
1010.100 What is the purpose and scope of this part?
1010.110 What definitions apply to this part?
Subpart B--Understanding Priority of Service
1010.200 What is priority of service?
1010.210 In which Department job training programs do covered
persons receive priority of service?
1010.220 How are recipients required to implement priority of
service?
1010.230 In addition to the responsibilities of all recipients, do
States and political subdivisions of States have any particular
responsibilities in implementing priority of service?
1010.240 Will the Department be monitoring for compliance with
priority of service?
1010.250 Can priority of service be waived?
Subpart C--Applying Priority of Service
1010.300 What processes are to be implemented to identify covered
persons?
1010.310 How will priority of service be applied?
1010.320 Will recipients be required to collect information and
report on priority of service?
1010.330 What are the responsibilities of recipients to collect and
maintain data on covered and non-covered persons?
Authority: Public Law 109-461 (Dec. 22, 2006), section 605 [38
U.S.C. 4215 Note]; 38 U.S.C. 4215.
Subpart A--Purpose and Definitions
Sec. 1010.100 What is the purpose and scope of this part?
(a) Part 1010 contains the Department regulations implementing
priority of service for covered persons. Priority of service for
covered persons is authorized by section 2(a)(1) of JVA (38 U.S.C.
4215). These regulations fulfill section 605 of the Veterans Benefits,
Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, Public Law 109-461
(Dec. 22, 2006), which requires the Department to implement priority of
service via regulation.
(b) As provided in Sec. 1010.210, this part applies to all
qualified job training programs.
Sec. 1010.110 What definitions apply to this part?
The following definitions apply to this part:
Covered person as defined in section 2(a) of the JVA (38 U.S.C.
4215(a)) means a veteran or eligible spouse.
Department or DOL means the United States Department of Labor,
including its agencies and organizational units and their
representatives.
Eligible spouse as defined in section 2(a) of the JVA (38 U.S.C.
4215(a)) means the spouse of any of the following:
(1) Any veteran who died of a service-connected disability;
(2) Any member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who, at
the time of application for the priority, is listed in one or more of
the following categories and has been so listed for a total of more
than 90 days:
(i) Missing in action;
(ii) Captured in line of duty by a hostile force; or
(iii) Forcibly detained or interned in line of duty by a foreign
government or power;
(3) Any veteran who has a total disability resulting from a
service-connected disability, as evaluated by the Department of
Veterans Affairs;
(4) Any veteran who died while a disability, as indicated in
paragraph (3) of this definition, was in existence.
Grant means an award of Federal financial assistance by the
Department of Labor to an eligible recipient.
Jobs for Veterans Act (JVA) means Public Law 107-288 (2002).
Section 2(a) of the JVA, codified at 38 U.S.C. 4215(a), provides
priority of service for covered persons.
Non-covered person means any individual who meets neither the
definition of ``veteran,'' as defined below, nor the definition of
``eligible spouse'' as defined above.
Qualified job training program means any program or service for
workforce preparation, development, or delivery that is directly
funded, in whole or in part, by the Department of Labor.
Recipient means an entity to which federal financial assistance, in
whole or in part, is awarded directly from the Department or through a
sub-award for any qualified job training program.
Secretary means the Secretary of the Department of Labor.
Veteran means a person who served in the active military, naval, or
air service, and who was discharged or released therefrom under
conditions other than dishonorable, as specified in 38 U.S.C. 101(2).
Subpart B--Understanding Priority of Service
Sec. 1010.200 What is priority of service?
(a) As defined in section 2(a) of the JVA (38 U.S.C. 4215(a))
``priority of service'' means, with respect to any qualified job
training program, that a covered person shall be given priority over a
non-covered person for the
[[Page 48094]]
receipt of employment, training, and placement services provided under
that program, notwithstanding any other provision of the law.
(b) Priority in the context of providing priority of service to
veterans and other covered persons in qualified job training programs
covered by this regulation means the right to take precedence over non-
covered persons in obtaining services. Depending on the type of service
or resource being provided, taking precedence may mean:
(1) The covered person receives access to the service or resource
earlier in time than the non-covered person; or
(2) If the service or resource is limited, the covered person
receives access to the service or resource instead of or before the
non-covered person.
Sec. 1010.210 In which Department job training programs do covered
persons receive priority of service?
(a) Priority of service applies to every qualified job training
program funded, in whole or in part, by the Department, including:
(1) Any such program or service that uses technology to assist
individuals to access workforce development programs (such as job and
training opportunities, labor market information, career assessment
tools, and related support services); and
(2) Any such program or service under the public employment service
system, One-Stop Career Centers, the Workforce Investment Act of 1998,
a demonstration or other temporary program; any workforce development
program targeted to specific groups; and those programs implemented by
States or local service providers based on Federal block grants
administered by the Department.
(b) The implementation of priority of service does not change the
intended function of a program or service. Covered persons must meet
all statutory eligibility and program requirements for participation in
order to receive priority for a program or service.
Sec. 1010.220 How are recipients required to implement priority of
service?
(a) An agreement to implement priority of service, as described in
these regulations and in any departmental guidance, is a condition for
receipt of all Department job training program funds.
(b) All recipients are required to ensure that priority of service
is applied by all sub-recipients of Department funds. All program
activities, including those obtained through requests for proposals,
solicitations for grant awards, sub-grants, contracts, sub-contracts,
and (where feasible) memoranda of understanding or other service
provision agreements, issued or executed by qualified job training
program operators, must be administered in compliance with priority of
service.
Sec. 1010.230 In addition to the responsibilities of all recipients,
do States and political subdivisions of States have any particular
responsibilities in implementing priority of service?
(a) Pursuant to their responsibility under the Workforce Investment
Act of 1998, States are required to address priority of service in
their comprehensive strategic plan for the State's workforce investment
system. Specifically, States must develop policies for the delivery of
priority of service by the State Workforce Agency or Agencies, Local
Workforce Investment Boards, and One-Stop Career Centers for all
qualified job training programs delivered through the State's workforce
system. The policy or policies must require that processes are in place
to ensure that covered persons are identified at the point of entry and
given an opportunity to take full advantage of priority of service.
These processes shall be undertaken to ensure that covered persons are
aware of:
(1) Their entitlement to priority of service;
(2) The full array of employment, training, and placement services
available under priority of service; and
(3) Any applicable eligibility requirements for those programs and/
or services.
(b) The State's policy or policies must require Local Workforce
Investment Boards to develop and include in their strategic local plan,
policies implementing priority of service for the local One-Stop Career
Centers and for service delivery by local workforce preparation and
training providers. These policies must establish processes to ensure
that covered persons are identified at the point of entry so that
covered persons are able to take full advantage of priority of service.
These processes shall ensure that covered persons are aware of:
(1) Their entitlement to priority of service;
(2) The full array of employment, training, and placement services
available under priority of service; and
(3) Any applicable eligibility requirements for those programs and/
or services.
Sec. 1010.240 Will the Department be monitoring for compliance with
priority of service?
(a) The Department will monitor recipients of funds for qualified
job training programs to ensure that covered persons are made aware of
and afforded priority of service.
(b) Monitoring priority of service will be performed jointly
between the Veterans' Employment and Training Service (VETS) and the
DOL agency responsible for the program's administration and oversight.
(c) A recipient's failure to provide priority of service to covered
persons will be handled in accordance with the program's established
compliance review processes. In addition to the remedies available
under the program's compliance review processes, a recipient may be
required to submit a corrective action plan to correct such failure.
Sec. 1010.250 Can priority of service be waived?
No, priority of service cannot be waived.
Subpart C--Applying Priority of Service
Sec. 1010.300 What processes are to be implemented to identify
covered persons?
(a) Recipients of funds for qualified job training programs must
implement processes to identify covered persons who physically access
service delivery points or who access virtual service delivery programs
or Web sites in order to provide covered persons with timely and useful
information on priority of service at the point of entry. Point of
entry may include reception through a One-Stop Career Center
established pursuant to the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, as part
of an application process for a specific program, or through any other
method by which covered persons express an interest in receiving
services, either in-person or virtually.
(b) These processes must ensure that:
(1) Covered persons are identified at the point of entry to allow
covered persons to take full advantage of pr