In the Matter of Certain Power Supplies; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Add a Respondent, 42365-42366 [E8-16628]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Notices
NORTH CAROLINA
Chatham County
Woody, Burdett, House, (Chatham County
MRA) 2232 White Smith Rd., Siler City,
08000773
Cleveland County
Double Shoals Cotton Mill, 199 Old Mill Rd.,
Double Shoals, 08000775
Durham County
Liberty Warehouse Nos. 1 and 2, (Durham
MRA) 611–613 Rigsbee Ave., Durham,
08000774
[FR Doc. E8–16531 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–70–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–447 and 731–
TA–1116 (Final)]
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel
Pipe From China
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and
1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in
the United States is materially injured
by reason of imports from China of
circular welded carbon-quality steel
pipe, provided for in subheadings
7306.19.10, 7306.19.51, 7306.30.10,
7306.30.50, 7306.50.10, and 7306.50.50
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that have been found
by the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) to be subsidized by the
Government of China and sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(LTFV).2 3
PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Background
The Commission instituted these
investigations effective June 7, 2007,
following receipt of a petition filed with
the Commission and Commerce by
Allied Tube & Conduit, Harvey, IL;
IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., Camanche, IA;
Northwest Pipe Co., Portland, OR;
Sharon Tube Co., Sharon, PA; Western
Tube & Conduit Corp., Long Beach, CA;
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioner Dean A. Pinkert recused himself
to avoid any conflict of interest or appearance of a
conflict.
3 The Commission further determines that critical
circumstances do not exist with respect to those
imports of the subject merchandise from China that
were subject to the affirmative critical
circumstances determination by the Department of
Commerce.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
Wheatland Tube Co., Collingswood, NJ;
and the United Steelworkers, Pittsburgh,
PA. The final phase of the investigations
was scheduled by the Commission
following notification of preliminary
determinations by Commerce that
imports of welded carbon-quality steel
pipe from China were being subsidized
within the meaning of section 703(b) of
the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and being
sold at LTFV within the meaning of
section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of
the final phase of the Commission’s
investigations and of a public hearing to
be held in connection therewith was
given by posting copies of the notice in
the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register of
February 5, 2008 (73 FR 6738). The
hearing was held in Washington, DC, on
May 13, 2008, and all persons who
requested the opportunity were
permitted to appear in person or by
counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these investigations to
the Secretary of Commerce on July 15,
2008. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4019
(July 2008), entitled Circular Welded
Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From China:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–447 and
731–TA–1116 (Final).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 15, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–16519 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–646]
In the Matter of Certain Power
Supplies; Notice of Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting Complainants’
Motion To Amend the Complaint and
Notice of Investigation To Add a
Respondent
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 5) granting
complainant’s motion to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42365
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–1999. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on May 8, 2008, based on a complaint
filed by Ultra Products, Inc. of Fletcher,
Ohio and Systemax Inc. of Port
Washington, New York (collectively
‘‘Ultra’’). 73 FR 26144–5 (May 8, 2008).
The complaint, as amended and
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain power supplies by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 7,133,293. The complaint
further alleges the existence of a
domestic industry. The Commission’s
notice of investigation named Aerocool
Advanced Technologies Corporation of
Taipei Hsien, Taiwan; Langears, Inc.
d/b/a Aerocool U.S. of Fremont,
California; Andyson International Co. of
Taipei, Taiwan; Atng Power Co., Ltd.
a/k/a I Horng, Power Co., Ltd. of Taipei
Hsien, Taiwan; Coolmax Technology
Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; Enermax
Technology Corporation of Taoyuan,
Taiwan; Enermax USA Corporation of
City of Industry, California; High
Performance Enterprise PLC, d/b/a High
Performance Group or Hiper Group of
Milton Keynes, United Kingdom; High
Performance Group Inc., d/b/a Hight
Performance Group or Hiper Group of
San Mateo, California; KWI Technology
Inc. d/b/a Kingwin of City of Industry
California; San Hawk Technic Co. Ltd.,
a/k/a Sky Hawk Group of Taipei
Taiwan; Eagle Technology Inc., a/k/a
Sky Hawk USA or Eagle Tech of City of
Industry, California; Sunbearn Company
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
42366
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Notices
of Taipei City, Taiwan; and
Sunbearntech, Inc. of Hacienda Heights,
California as respondents.
On May 20, 2008, Ultra filed a motion
for leave to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to add a
respondent, Super Flower Computer,
Inc. (‘‘Super Flower’’). On June 11,
2008, the IA filed a response in support
of the motion.
On June 27, 2008, the ALJ issued the
subject ID granting the motion, finding
that, pursuant to Commission Rule
210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)), there
was good cause to add Super Flower as
a respondent. No petitions for review of
this ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 16, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–16628 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
Cam and Elena Cam execute a deed
restriction to preserve natural vegetative
and hydrologic conditions on property
owned by them.
The Department of Justice will accept
written comments relating to this
proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)
days from the date of publication of this
Notice. Please address comments to
Harold Malkin, Assistant United States
Attorney, 700 Stewart Street, Suite
5220, Seattle, Washington 98101–1271,
and refer to United States v. Bonneville
Hot Springs, Inc., et al. (W.D. Wash.),
No. 08–5184–RBL.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
States District Court for the Western
District of Washington, 700 Stewart
Street, Seattle, Washington 98101–1271.
In addition, the proposed Consent
Decree may be viewed at https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html.
Russell M. Young,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Defense Section, Environment & Natural
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E8–16532 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
Decree
PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Alliance for Sustainable
Air Transportation, Inc
In accordance with Departmental
Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. Bonneville Hot Springs,
Inc., et al. (W.D. Wash.), No. C08–5184–
RBL, was lodged with the United States
District Court for the Western District of
Washington on July 14, 2008.
This proposed Consent Decree
concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against Bonneville Hot
Springs, Inc., d/b/a/ Bonneville Hot
Springs Resort; Pirfil (‘‘Pete’’) Cam, and
Elena Cam, pursuant to Sections 301
and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33
U.S.C. 1311 and 1344, to obtain
injunctive relief from and impose civil
penalties against the Defendants for
violating the Clean Water Act by
discharging pollutants without a permit
into waters of the United States. The
Complaint also alleges that the
Defendants committed trespass, in
violation of Washington State law, RCW
4.24.630. The proposed Consent Decree
resolves these allegations by requiring
the Defendants to restore the impacted
areas and pay a civil penalty, and also
requires that Defendants Pirfil (‘‘Pete’’)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
Notice is hereby given that, on May
29, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Alliance for
Sustainable Air Transportation, Inc.
(‘‘the Joint Venture’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, ACS International LLC,
Overland Park, KS; Selex Sistemi
Integrati, Inc., Overland Park, KS; and
University of Central Florida, Orlando,
FL have been added as parties to this
venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and the Joint
Venture intends to file additional
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
written notifications disclosing all
changes in membership.
On March 14, 2008, the Joint Venture
filed its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on April 28, 2008 (73 FR
22974).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. E8–16442 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control
Association
Notice is hereby given that, on June
12, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD Copy Control
Association has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, A&A Stamper House Inc.,
Baldwin Park, CA; ArcSoft Inc.,
Fremont, CA; BayTSP.Com, Inc., Los
Gatos, CA; Challenge Technology (Hong
Kong) Limited, Kwun Tong, HONG
KONG-CHINA; Main Technology Co.,
Ltd., Taipei Hsien, TAIWAN;
Telestream, Inc., Nevada City, CA; The
Refined Industry Co., Ltd., Shatin,
HONG KONG-CHINA; and Vobile, Inc.,
Santa Clara, CA have been added as
parties to this venture.
Also, Netflix Inc., Los Gatos, CA; and
PrimeDisc Limited, Fo Tan, Shatin,
HONG KONG-CHINA have withdrawn
as parties to this venture. In addition,
the following members have changed
their names: CCE da Amazonia S.A. to
ˆ
´
Cemaz Industria Electronica da
Amazonia S/A, Sao Paulo, BRAZIL;
CustomFlix Labs Inc. to On Demand
Publishing LLC, Scotts Valley, CA; KD
Media, Inc. to MediaCore, Inc.,
Gyeonggi-do, REPUBLIC OF KOREA;
and TAKT Kwiatkowski & Miadzel Sp.j
to TAKT Sp. z.o.o., Warsaw, POLAND.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 140 (Monday, July 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42365-42366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16628]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-646]
In the Matter of Certain Power Supplies; Notice of Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting
Complainants' Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
To Add a Respondent
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 5)
granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and notice of
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-1999. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on May 8, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Ultra Products, Inc. of
Fletcher, Ohio and Systemax Inc. of Port Washington, New York
(collectively ``Ultra''). 73 FR 26144-5 (May 8, 2008). The complaint,
as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into
the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of certain power supplies by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,133,293. The
complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The
Commission's notice of investigation named Aerocool Advanced
Technologies Corporation of Taipei Hsien, Taiwan; Langears, Inc. d/b/a
Aerocool U.S. of Fremont, California; Andyson International Co. of
Taipei, Taiwan; Atng Power Co., Ltd. a/k/a I Horng, Power Co., Ltd. of
Taipei Hsien, Taiwan; Coolmax Technology Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan;
Enermax Technology Corporation of Taoyuan, Taiwan; Enermax USA
Corporation of City of Industry, California; High Performance
Enterprise PLC, d/b/a High Performance Group or Hiper Group of Milton
Keynes, United Kingdom; High Performance Group Inc., d/b/a Hight
Performance Group or Hiper Group of San Mateo, California; KWI
Technology Inc. d/b/a Kingwin of City of Industry California; San Hawk
Technic Co. Ltd., a/k/a Sky Hawk Group of Taipei Taiwan; Eagle
Technology Inc., a/k/a Sky Hawk USA or Eagle Tech of City of Industry,
California; Sunbearn Company
[[Page 42366]]
of Taipei City, Taiwan; and Sunbearntech, Inc. of Hacienda Heights,
California as respondents.
On May 20, 2008, Ultra filed a motion for leave to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to add a respondent, Super Flower
Computer, Inc. (``Super Flower''). On June 11, 2008, the IA filed a
response in support of the motion.
On June 27, 2008, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the
motion, finding that, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR
210.14(b)(1)), there was good cause to add Super Flower as a
respondent. No petitions for review of this ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 16, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-16628 Filed 7-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P