Information Collection Request for Extension (Without Changes) of the Prisoner Reentry Initiative Reporting System; Comment Request, 41126-41128 [E8-16318]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
41126
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Notices
As the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit has
held, under the APPA a court considers,
among other things, the relationship
between the remedy secured and the
specific allegations set forth in the
government’s complaint, whether the
decree is sufficiently clear, whether
enforcement mechanisms are sufficient,
and whether the decree may positively
harm third parties. See Microsoft, 56
F.3d at 1458–62. With respect to the
adequacy of the relief secured by the
decree, a court may not ‘‘engage in an
unrestricted evaluation of what relief
would best serve the public.’’ United
States v. BNS, Inc., 858 F.2d 456, 462
(9th Cir. 1988) (citing United States v.
Bechtel Corp., 648 F.2d 660, 666 (9th
Cir. 1981)); see also Microsoft, 56 F.3d
at 1460–62; United States v. Alcoa, Inc.,
152 F. Supp. 2d 37, 40 (D.D.C. 2001).
Courts have held that:
[t]he balancing of competing social and
political interests affected by a proposed
antitrust consent decree must be left, in the
first instance, to the discretion of the
Attorney General. The court’s role in
protecting the public interest is one of
insuring that the government has not
breached its duty to the public in consenting
to the decree. The court is required to
determine not whether a particular decree is
the one that will best serve society, but
whether the settlement is ‘‘within the reaches
of the public interest.’’ More elaborate
requirements might undermine the
effectiveness of antitrust enforcement by
consent decree.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Bechtel, 648 F.2d at 666 (emphasis
added) (citations omitted).3 In
determining whether a proposed
settlement is in the public interest, a
district court ‘‘must accord deference to
the government’s predictions about the
efficacy of its remedies, and may not
require that the remedies perfectly
match the alleged violations.’’ SBC
Commc’ns, 489 F. Supp. 2d at 17; see
also Microsoft, 56 F.3d at 1461 (noting
the need for courts to be ‘‘deferential to
the government’s predictions as to the
effect of the proposed remedies’’);
consider and amended the list of factors to focus on
competitive considerations and to address
potentially ambiguous judgment terms. Compare 15
U.S.C. 16(e)(2004), with 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1) (2006);
see also SBC Commc’ns, 489 F. Supp. 2d at 11
(concluding that the 2004 amendments ‘‘effected
minimal changes’’ to Tunney Act review).
3 Cf. BNS, 858 F.2d at 464 (holding that the
court’s ‘‘ultimate authority under the [APPA] is
limited to approving or disapproving the consent
decree’’); United States v. Gillette Co., 406 F. Supp.
713, 716 (D. Mass. 1975) (noting that, in this way,
the court is constrained to ‘‘look at the overall
picture not hypercritically, nor with a microscope,
but with an artist’s reducing glass’’). See generally
Microsoft, 56 F.3d at 1461 (discussing whether ‘‘the
remedies [obtained in the decree are] so
inconsonant with the allegations charged as to fall
outside of the ‘reaches of the public interest’ ’’).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:03 Jul 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
United States v. Archer-DanielsMidland Co., 272 F. Supp. 2d 1, 6
(D.D.C. 2003) (noting that the court
should grant due respect to the United
States’ prediction as to the effect of
proposed remedies, its perception of the
market structure, and its views of the
nature of the case).
Courts have greater flexibility in
approving proposed consent decrees
than in crafting their own decrees
following a finding of liability in a
litigated matter. ‘‘[A] proposed decree
must be approved even if it falls short
of the remedy the court would impose
on its own, as long as it falls within the
range of acceptability or is ‘within the
reaches of public interest.’ ’’ United
States v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 552 F.
Supp. 131, 151 (D.D.C. 1982) (citations
omitted) (quoting United States v.
Gillette Co., 406 F. Supp. 713, 716 (D.
Mass. 1975)), aff’d sub nom. Maryland
v. United States, 460 U.S. 1001 (1983);
see also United States v. Alcan
Aluminum Ltd., 605 F. Supp. 619, 622
(W.D. Ky. 1985) (approving the consent
decree even though the court would
have imposed a greater remedy). To
meet this standard, the United States
‘‘need only provide a factual basis for
concluding that the settlements are
reasonably adequate remedies for the
alleged harms.’’ SBC Commc’ns, 489 F.
Supp. 2d at 17.
Moreover, the court’s role under the
APPA is limited to reviewing the
remedy in relationship to the violations
that the United States has alleged in its
Complaint, and does not authorize the
court to ‘‘construct [its] own
hypothetical case and then evaluate the
decree against that case.’’ Microsoft, 56
F.3d at 1459. Because the ‘‘court’s
authority to review the decree depends
entirely on the government’s exercising
its prosecutorial discretion by bringing
a case in the first place,’’ it follows that
‘‘the court is only authorized to review
the decree itself,’’ and not to ‘‘effectively
redraft the complaint’’ to inquire into
other matters that the United States did
not pursue. Id. at 1459–60. As this Court
recently confirmed in SBC
Communications, courts ‘‘cannot look
beyond the complaint in making the
public interest determination unless the
complaint is drafted so narrowly as to
make a mockery of judicial power.’’ SBC
Commc’ns, 489 F. Supp. 2d at 15.
In its 2004 amendments, Congress
made clear its intent to preserve the
practical benefits of utilizing consent
decrees in antitrust enforcement, adding
the unambiguous instruction that
‘‘[n]othing in this section shall be
construed to require the court to
conduct an evidentiary hearing or to
require the court to permit anyone to
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
intervene.’’ 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(2). The
language wrote into the statute what
Congress intended when it enacted the
Tunney Act in 1974, as Senator Tunney
explained: ‘‘[t]he court is nowhere
compelled to go to trial or to engage in
extended proceedings which might have
the effect of vitiating the benefits of
prompt and less costly settlement
through the consent decree process.’’
119 Cong. Rec. 24,598 (1973) (statement
of Senator Tunney). Rather, the
procedure for the public interest
determination is left to the discretion of
the court, with the recognition that the
court’s ‘‘scope of review remains
sharply proscribed by precedent and the
nature of Tunney Act proceedings.’’
SBC Commc’ns, 489 F. Supp. 2d at 11.4
VIII. Determinative Documents
There are no determinative materials
or documents within the meaning of the
APPA that were considered by the
United States in formulating the
proposed Final Judgment.
Dated: July 3, 2008.
Respectfully submitted,
____/s/____
Angela L. Hughes (DC Bar #30342 10),
Michelle Livingston (DC Bar #461268),
Trial Attorneys
U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division
Transportation, Energy, and Agriculture, 450
5th Street, NW., Suite 4100 Washington, DC
20530.
[FR Doc. E8–16254 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Information Collection Request for
Extension (Without Changes) of the
Prisoner Reentry Initiative Reporting
System; Comment Request
Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
4 See United States v. Enova Corp., 107 F. Supp.
2d 10, 17 (D.D.C. 2000) (noting that the ‘‘Tunney
Act expressly allows the court to make its public
interest determination on the basis of the
competitive impact statement and response to
comments alone’’); United States v. Mid-Am.
Dairymen, Inc., 1977–1 Trade Cas. (CCH) 61,508, at
71,980 (W.D. Mo. 1977) (‘‘Absent a showing of
corrupt failure of the government to discharge its
duty, the Court, in making its public interest
finding, should * * * carefully, consider the
explanations of the government in the competitive
impact statement and its responses to comments in
order to determine whether those explanations are
reasonable under the circumstances.’’); S. Rep. No.
93–298, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., at 6 (1973) (‘‘Where
the public interest can be meaningfully evaluated
simply on the basis of briefs and oral arguments,
that is the approach that should be utilized.’’).
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Notices
paperwork and respondent burden
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the
Employment and Training
Administration is soliciting comments
concerning the extension of the
currently approved reporting and
recordkeeping system to support the
Prisoner Reentry Initiative (PRI).
A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
by contacting the office listed below in
the addressee section of this notice or by
accessing: https://www.doleta.gov/
OMBCN/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee’s section below on or before
September 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to the Employment and Training
Administration, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210,
Attention: Gregg Weltz, Telephone
number: 202–693–3030 (this is not a
toll-free number). Fax: 202–693–3861.
E-mail: weltz.greg@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In applying for the Prisoner Reentry
Initiative grants, Faith-based and
Community Organization grantees agree
to submit participant data and quarterly
aggregate reports for individuals who
receive services through PRI programs
and their partnerships with One-Stop
Centers, local Workforce Investment
Boards, employment providers, the
criminal justice system, and local
housing authorities. The reports include
aggregate data on demographic
characteristics, types of services
received, placements, outcomes, and
follow-up status. Specifically, they
summarize data on participants who
received employment and placement
services, housing assistance, mentoring,
and other services essential to
reintegrating ex-offenders through PRI
programs.
This requests an extension of the
currently approved information
collection to meet the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements of the
Prisoner Reentry Initiative through an
ETA-provided, web-based Management
Information System (MIS). In addition
to reporting participant information and
performance-related outcomes, PRI
grantees demonstrate their ability to
establish effective partnerships with the
criminal justice system, local Workforce
Investment Boards, local housing
authorities, and other partner agencies.
They also document the cost
effectiveness of their projects. The MIS
reporting and recordkeeping system
incorporates each of these aspects
necessary for program evaluation.
Five outcome measures are used to
measure success in the PRI grants:
Entered employment rate, employment
retention rate, attainment of a degree or
certificate, average six-month
postprogram earnings, and recidivism
rate. Several of these conform to the
common performance measures
implemented across federal job training
programs as of July 1, 2005. By
standardizing the reporting and
performance requirements of different
programs, the common measures give
ETA the ability to compare across
programs the core goals of the workforce
system—how many people entered jobs;
how many stayed employed; and how
many successfully completed an
educational program. Although the
common measures are an integral part of
ETA’s performance accountability
system, these measures provide only
part of the information necessary to
effectively oversee the workforce
investment system. ETA also collects
data from PRI grantees on program
activities, participants, and outcomes
that are necessary for program
management and for conveying full and
41127
accurate information on the
performance of PRI programs to
policymakers and stakeholders.
This information collection maintains
a reporting and record-keeping system
for a minimum level of information
collection that is necessary to comply
with Equal Opportunity requirements,
to hold PRI grantees appropriately
accountable for the Federal funds they
receive, including common performance
measures, and to allow the Department
to fulfill its oversight and management
responsibilities.
II. Review Focus
The Department of Labor is
particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
III. Current Actions
Type of Review: Extension without
revisions of a currently approved
information collection.
Agency: Employment and Training
Administration.
Title: Prisoner Reentry Initiative (PRI)
Reporting System.
OMB Number: 1205–0455.
Affected Public: Faith-Based and
Community Organization grantees.
Total Respondents: 74 grantees.
Frequency: Quarterly.
ESTIMATED TOTAL BURDEN HOURS
Total
respondents
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Form/activity
Participant Data Collection ...................................................
Quarterly narrative progress report ......................................
Quarterly performance report ...............................................
Totals .............................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:03 Jul 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00102
74
74
74
74
Fmt 4703
Frequency
Total annual
response
Continual .....
Quarterly .....
Quarterly .....
.....................
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
6,610
296
296
7,202
17JYN1
Average time
per response
(hours)
1.8
16
16
..........................
Total annual
burden hours
11,898
4,736
4,736
21,370
41128
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Notices
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request and will
become a matter of public record.
Dated: July 10, 2008.
Gay M. Gilbert,
Administrator, Office of Workforce
Investment, Employment and Training
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–16318 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
July 11, 2008.
The Department of Labor (DOL)
hereby announces the submission of the
following public information collection
request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
A copy of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation; including
among other things a description of the
likely respondents, proposed frequency
of response, and estimated total burden
may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov
Web site at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain or by contacting
Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is
not a toll-free number)/e-mail:
king.darrin@dol.gov.
Interested parties are encouraged to
send comments to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Mine
Safety and Health Administration
(MSHA), Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room
10235, Washington, DC 20503,
Telephone: 202–395–4816/Fax: 202–
395–6974 (these are not toll-free
numbers), E-mail:
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register. In order to
ensure the appropriate consideration,
comments should reference the
applicable OMB Control Number (see
below).
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:03 Jul 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Mine Safety and Health
Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Title of Collection: Permissible
Equipment Testing.
OMB Control Number: 1219–0066.
Form Number: MSHA 2000–38.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
262.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 4,302.
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden:
$1,671,381.
Affected Public: Business or other for
profits (Mines).
Description: This OMB Control
Number pertains to the information
collection requirements associated with
the procedures by which manufacturers
may apply for, and have equipment
approved as permissible for use in
mines. For additional information, see
related notice published on April 21,
2008 at 73 FR 21377.
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–16323 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS:
Mississippi River Commission.
TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m., August 11, 2008.
PLACE: On board MISSISSIPPI V at
Levee Park, Red Wing, MN.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: (1)
Summary report by President of the
Commission on national and regional
issues affecting the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and Commission programs
and projects on the Mississippi River
and its tributaries; (2) District
Commander’s overview of current
project issues within the St. Paul
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
District; and (3) Presentations by local
organizations and members of the
public giving views or comments on any
issue affecting the programs or projects
of the Commission and the Corps of
Engineers.
9 am., August 13, 2008.
On board MISSISSIPPI V at
Oneida Landing, Davenport, IA.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: (1)
Summary report by President of the
Commission on national and regional
issues affecting the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and Commission programs
and projects on the Mississippi River
and its tributaries; (2) District
Commander’s overview of current
project issues within the Rock Island
District; and (3) Presentations by local
organizations and members of the
public giving views or comments on any
issue affecting the programs or projects
of the Commission and the Corps of
Engineers.
TIME AND DATE: 1:30 p.m., August 14,
2008.
PLACE: On board MISSISSIPPI V at City
Front, Hannibal, MO.
STATUS: Open to the public for
observation but not for participation.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The
Commission will consider the Upper
Mississippi Illinois River
Comprehensive Plan.
TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m., August 15, 2008.
PLACE: On board MISSISSIPPI V at
Melvin Price Lock & Dam, Alton, IL.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: (1)
Summary report by President of the
Commission on national and regional
issues affecting the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and Commission programs
and projects on the Mississippi River
and its tributaries; (2) District
Commander’s overview of current
project issues within the St. Louis
District and; (3) Presentations by local
organizations and members of the
public giving views or comments on any
issue affecting the programs or projects
of the Commission and the Corps of
Engineers.
TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m., August 18, 2008.
PLACE: On board MISSISSIPPI V at City
Front, New Madrid, MO.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: (1)
Summary report by President of the
Commission on national and regional
issues affecting the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and Commission programs
and projects on the Mississippi River
and its tributaries; (2) District
TIME AND DATE:
PLACE:
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 138 (Thursday, July 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41126-41128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16318]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Information Collection Request for Extension (Without Changes) of
the Prisoner Reentry Initiative Reporting System; Comment Request
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce
[[Page 41127]]
paperwork and respondent burden conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to ensure that
requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed. Currently, the Employment and
Training Administration is soliciting comments concerning the extension
of the currently approved reporting and recordkeeping system to support
the Prisoner Reentry Initiative (PRI).
A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be
obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section
of this notice or by accessing: https://www.doleta.gov/OMBCN/
OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee's section below on or before September 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Employment and Training
Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210,
Attention: Gregg Weltz, Telephone number: 202-693-3030 (this is not a
toll-free number). Fax: 202-693-3861. E-mail: weltz.greg@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In applying for the Prisoner Reentry Initiative grants, Faith-based
and Community Organization grantees agree to submit participant data
and quarterly aggregate reports for individuals who receive services
through PRI programs and their partnerships with One-Stop Centers,
local Workforce Investment Boards, employment providers, the criminal
justice system, and local housing authorities. The reports include
aggregate data on demographic characteristics, types of services
received, placements, outcomes, and follow-up status. Specifically,
they summarize data on participants who received employment and
placement services, housing assistance, mentoring, and other services
essential to reintegrating ex-offenders through PRI programs.
This requests an extension of the currently approved information
collection to meet the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of the
Prisoner Reentry Initiative through an ETA-provided, web-based
Management Information System (MIS). In addition to reporting
participant information and performance-related outcomes, PRI grantees
demonstrate their ability to establish effective partnerships with the
criminal justice system, local Workforce Investment Boards, local
housing authorities, and other partner agencies. They also document the
cost effectiveness of their projects. The MIS reporting and
recordkeeping system incorporates each of these aspects necessary for
program evaluation.
Five outcome measures are used to measure success in the PRI
grants: Entered employment rate, employment retention rate, attainment
of a degree or certificate, average six-month postprogram earnings, and
recidivism rate. Several of these conform to the common performance
measures implemented across federal job training programs as of July 1,
2005. By standardizing the reporting and performance requirements of
different programs, the common measures give ETA the ability to compare
across programs the core goals of the workforce system--how many people
entered jobs; how many stayed employed; and how many successfully
completed an educational program. Although the common measures are an
integral part of ETA's performance accountability system, these
measures provide only part of the information necessary to effectively
oversee the workforce investment system. ETA also collects data from
PRI grantees on program activities, participants, and outcomes that are
necessary for program management and for conveying full and accurate
information on the performance of PRI programs to policymakers and
stakeholders.
This information collection maintains a reporting and record-
keeping system for a minimum level of information collection that is
necessary to comply with Equal Opportunity requirements, to hold PRI
grantees appropriately accountable for the Federal funds they receive,
including common performance measures, and to allow the Department to
fulfill its oversight and management responsibilities.
II. Review Focus
The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments
which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions
Type of Review: Extension without revisions of a currently approved
information collection.
Agency: Employment and Training Administration.
Title: Prisoner Reentry Initiative (PRI) Reporting System.
OMB Number: 1205-0455.
Affected Public: Faith-Based and Community Organization grantees.
Total Respondents: 74 grantees.
Frequency: Quarterly.
Estimated Total Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average time
Form/activity Total Frequency Total annual per response Total annual
respondents response (hours) burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participant Data Collection.. 74 Continual....... 6,610 1.8 11,898
Quarterly narrative progress 74 Quarterly....... 296 16 4,736
report.
Quarterly performance report. 74 Quarterly....... 296 16 4,736
Totals................... 74 ................ 7,202 ............... 21,370
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 41128]]
Comments submitted in response to this comment request will be
summarized in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval
of the information collection request and will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: July 10, 2008.
Gay M. Gilbert,
Administrator, Office of Workforce Investment, Employment and Training
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-16318 Filed 7-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P
