In the Matter of Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 41117-41118 [E8-16279]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Notices The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 11, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–16280 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–647] In the Matter of Certain Hand-Held Meat Tenderizers; Notice of Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Correcting the Name of a Respondent U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 4) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) correcting the name of a respondent in this investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark B. Rees, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3116. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 8, 2008, the Commission instituted this investigation based on the complaint, as supplemented, of Jaccard Corporation of Orchard Park, New York, alleging violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:03 Jul 16, 2008 Jkt 214001 United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain hand-held meat tenderizers by reason of infringement of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 1,172,879 (the JACCARD word mark) and also by reason of infringement of trade dress. 73 FR 27846 (May 14, 2008). The notice of investigation, tracking the complaint, named Keystone Manufacturing, Inc. of Buffalo, New York and Chefmaster/Mr. Bar-B-Q Inc. of Old Bethpage, New York as respondents. On May 22, 2008, the ALJ sua sponte issued the subject ID (Order No. 4) amending the notice of investigation so that ‘‘Chefmaster/Mr. Bar-B-Q Inc.’’ instead reads ‘‘Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc.’’, which he found is this respondent’s correct name. No petitions for review of this ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review this ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 11, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–16281 Filed 7–15–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–641] In the Matter of Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 7) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting complainant’s motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 41117 documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted this investigation on March 31, 2008, based on a complaint filed by General Electric Company (‘‘GE’’). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain variable speed wind turbines and components thereof that allegedly infringe certain claims of United States Patent Nos. 5,083,039 and 6,921,985. The complaint named Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of America, Inc. of New York, New York, and Mitsubishi Power Systems, Inc. of Lake Mary, Florida. On September 16, 2007, GE filed a motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to correct two clerical errors: (1) An incorrect figure expressed in Confidential Exhibit 30, and (2) a respondent identified by a former name rather than its current name. The motion was not opposed. On June 18, 2008, the ALJ granted GE’s motion, finding that, it is in the best interest of the parties and the public interest for the complaint and notice of investigation to be corrected. No petitions for review of this ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ALJ’s ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By order of the Commission. E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM 17JYN1 41118 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Notices Issued: July 11, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–16279 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Notice is hereby given that on June 27, 2008, a proposed Consent Decree in United States and State of Oklahoma v. Albert Investment, et al., Civil Action No. 5:08–cv–637, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. In this action the United States, on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), sought to recover from certain parties response costs that it incurred in response to releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances from the Double Eagle Refinery Superfund Site (the ‘‘Site’’) located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The proposed Consent Decree resolves claims alleged by the United States, on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), and the United States Department of the Interior (‘‘DOI’’), under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. The proposed Consent Decree provides that the Settling Defendants, which sent waste oil containing hazardous substances to the Site for disposal, will pay the United States and the State of Oklahoma approximately $6.48 million in response costs and natural resource damages. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, and either e-mailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, NW., Washington, DC 20044– 7611, and should refer to United States and State of Oklahoma v. Albert Investment, et al., DOJ. Ref. 90–11–2– 857/2. The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, Western District of Oklahoma, 210 Park Ave., Suite 400, Oklahoma City, OK 72102, and at the offices of EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Ave., Dallas, VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:03 Jul 16, 2008 Jkt 214001 TX 75202–2733. During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $18.75 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at the stated address. Thomas A. Mariani, Jr., Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. E8–16392 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States of America v. Signature Flight Support Corporation and Hawker Beechcraft Services, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 5 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, Hold Separate and Preservation of Assets Stipulation and Order, and Competitive Impact Statement have been filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in United States of America v. Signature Flight Support Corporation and Hawker Beechcraft Services, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:08–cv– 01164–RWR. On July 3, 2008, the United States filed a Complaint alleging that the proposed acquisition by Signature Flight Support Corporation (‘‘Signature’’) of the fixed base operations (‘‘FB’’) of Hawker Beechcraft Services, Inc. (‘‘Hawker Beechcraft’’) at the Indianapolis International Airport (‘‘IND’’) would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18. The Complaint alleges that the acquisition would combine the only providers of FBO services at IND, resulting in higher prices and reduced services. The proposed Final Judgment requires the PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 parties to divest either Signature’s or Hawker Beechcraft’s FBO assets at IND. Copies of the Complaint, proposed Final Judgment, Hold Separate and Preservation of Assets Stipulation and Order, and Competitive Impact Statement are available for inspection at the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Antitrust Documents Group, Room 1010, 450 5th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202– 514–2481), on the Department of Justice’s Web site at https:// www.usdoj.gov/atr, and at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Copies of these materials may be obtained from the Antitrust Division upon request and payment of the copying fee set by Department of Justice regulations. Public comment is invited within sixty (60) days of the date of this notice. Such comments, and responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. Comments should be directed to Donna N. Kooperstein, Chief, Transportation, Energy & Agriculture Section, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice, Suite 4100, 450 5th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202–307–6410). Patricia A. Brink, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. United States District Court for the District of Columbia United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20530, Plaintiff, v. Signature Flight Support Corporation, Signature Plaza, 201 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1100, Orlando, Florida 32801, and Hawker Beechcraft Services, Inc., 10511 East Central, Wichita, Kansas 67206, Defendants Civil Action No.: Filed: Case: 1:08–cv–01164. Assigned To: Roberts, Richard W. Assign. Date: 7/3/2008. Description: Antitrust. Complaint The United States of America, acting under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, brings this civil antitrust action to enjoin the proposed acquisition by Signature Flight Support Corporation (‘‘Signature’’) of fixed base operations of Hawker Beechcraft Services, Inc. (‘‘Hawker Beechcraft’’) and to obtain E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM 17JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 138 (Thursday, July 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41117-41118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-641]


In the Matter of Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines and 
Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an 
Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion To Amend 
the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 7) issued by the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and 
notice of investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 31, 2008, based on a complaint filed by General Electric 
Company (``GE''). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain variable speed wind turbines and 
components thereof that allegedly infringe certain claims of United 
States Patent Nos. 5,083,039 and 6,921,985. The complaint named 
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan, Mitsubishi Heavy 
Industries of America, Inc. of New York, New York, and Mitsubishi Power 
Systems, Inc. of Lake Mary, Florida.
    On September 16, 2007, GE filed a motion to amend the complaint and 
notice of investigation to correct two clerical errors: (1) An 
incorrect figure expressed in Confidential Exhibit 30, and (2) a 
respondent identified by a former name rather than its current name. 
The motion was not opposed.
    On June 18, 2008, the ALJ granted GE's motion, finding that, it is 
in the best interest of the parties and the public interest for the 
complaint and notice of investigation to be corrected. No petitions for 
review of this ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ALJ's ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.


[[Page 41118]]


    Issued: July 11, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-16279 Filed 7-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.