Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia: Notice of Rescission of Administrative Review, 40499-40500 [E8-16153]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 15, 2008 / Notices
because these companies certified that
they made no POR shipments of subject
merchandise for which they had
knowledge of U.S. destination. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate established in the LTFV
investigation if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Further, the following deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of shrimp from India entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rates for the reviewed
companies will be the rates shown
above, except if the rate is less than 0.50
percent, de minimis within the meaning
of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), the cash
deposit will be zero; (2) for previously
investigated companies not listed above,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, or the LTFV investigation, but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 10.17
percent, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation. See Notice of
Amended Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India,
70 FR 5147, 5148 (Feb. 1, 2005). These
deposit requirements shall remain in
effect until further notice.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility,
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Jul 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results of review in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: July 7, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
General Issues
1. Offsetting of Negative Margins.
2. Whether the Department’s Decision to
Select Only Two Mandatory
Respondents was Supported by Evidence
on the Record.
3. Continuing to Apply AFA to
Uncooperative Respondents for the Final
Results.
4. Ministerial Errors in the Preliminary
Results.
Company-Specific Issues
5. What Date to Assign to Unpaid U.S. Sales
for Devi.
6. Devi’s Raw Material Costs.
7. Devi’s Compliance with Indian Licensing
Requirements.
8. Whether to Include in Margin Calculations
Previously Reviewed U.S. Sales for
Falcon Which Entered during the Period
of Review.
9. Falcon’s Raw Material Costs.
10. Whether to Base the Final Margin for
Uniroyal Marine Exports on AFA.
[FR Doc. E8–16152 Filed 7–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–557–813]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from
Malaysia: Notice of Rescission of
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests by
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (Department) initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs)
from Malaysia with respect to three
producers/exporters of the subject
merchandise. The period of review
(POR) is August 1, 2006, through July
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31, 2007. The Department is now
rescinding this administrative review in
its entirety.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 15, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lyn
Johnson or Richard Rimlinger, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5287 and (202)
482–4477, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Appendix—Issues in Decision
Memorandum
AGENCY:
40499
On May 6, 2008, the Department
published a Notice of Partial Rescission
of the Administrative Review and Intent
to Rescind the Administrative Review,
73 FR 24941 (May 6, 2008) (Intent to
Rescind), where it rescinded the review
of the antidumping duty order on
PRCBs from Malaysia with respect to
King Pac and announced its intent to
rescind the review with respect to Euro
Plastics Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. and its
affiliate Eplastics Procurement Center
Sdn. Bhd. (Euro Plastics) and with
respect to Zhin Hin Plastic
Manufacturer Sdn. Bhd. (also known as
Chin Hin Plastic Manufacture) (Zhin
Hin).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this
antidumping duty order is PRCBs which
may be referred to as t–shirt sacks,
merchandise bags, grocery bags, or
checkout bags. The subject merchandise
is defined as non–sealable sacks and
bags with handles (including
drawstrings), without zippers or integral
extruded closures, with or without
gussets, with or without printing, of
polyethylene film having a thickness no
greater than 0.035 inch (0.889 mm) and
no less than 0.00035 inch (0.00889 mm),
and with no length or width shorter
than 6 inches (15.24 cm) or longer than
40 inches (101.6 cm). The depth of the
bag may be shorter than 6 inches (15.24
cm) but not longer than 40 inches (101.6
cm).
PRCBs are typically provided without
any consumer packaging and free of
charge by retail establishments, e.g.,
grocery, drug, convenience, department,
specialty retail, discount stores, and
restaurants, to their customers to
package and carry their purchased
products. The scope of the order
excludes (1) polyethylene bags that are
not printed with logos or store names
and that are closeable with drawstrings
made of polyethylene film and (2)
polyethylene bags that are packed in
consumer packaging with printing that
E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM
15JYN1
40500
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 15, 2008 / Notices
refers to specific end–uses other than
packaging and carrying merchandise
from retail establishments, e.g., garbage
bags, lawn bags, trash–can
liners.Imports of the subject
merchandise are currently classifiable
under statistical category 3923.21.0085
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS).
Furthermore, although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of this order is
dispositive.
Rescission of the Administrative
Review
In Intent to Rescind, 73 FR at 24942,
we gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment by June 5,
2008. We did not receive any comments.
Therefore, consistent with Intent to
Rescind, we continue to find that Euro
Plastics and Zhin Hin (the only
remaining companies in this review)
had no entries of subject merchandise
during the POR. Accordingly, we are
rescinding this administrative review in
its entirety pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3).
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 08, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–16153 Filed 7–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Alternative Personnel Management
System (APMS) at the National
Institute of Standards and Technology
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Modifications with
Request for Comment.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Jul 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
SUMMARY: This notice provides for
changes to the existing provisions of the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology’s (NIST) Alternative
Personnel Management System (APMS)
published October 21, 1997 (62 FR
54606), and May 6, 2005 (70 FR 23996)
primarily to improve flexibility in
rewarding new and mid-level
employees and to broaden the ability to
make performance distinctions.
This notice is effective on
October 1, 2008. Comments will be
accepted until close of business on
August 14, 2008.
DATES:
Send or deliver comments
to Robert Kirkner, Chief Human Capital
Officer, National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Building 101, Room
A–531, 100 Bureau Drive Mail Stop
1700, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–1700,
FAX: (301) 948–6107 or e-mail
comments to ppschanges@nist.gov.
ADDRESSES:
For
questions or comments, please contact
Robert Kirkner at the National Institute
of Standards and Technology, (301)
975–3002; or Pamela Boyland at the
U.S. Department of Commerce, (202)
482–1068.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In accordance with Public Law 99–
574, the NIST Authorization Act for
1987, the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) approved a
demonstration project plan,
‘‘Alternative Personnel Management
System (APMS) at the National Institute
of Standards and Technology (NIST),’’
and published the plan in the Federal
Register on October 2, 1987 (52 FR
37082). The project plan has been
modified twice to clarify certain NIST
authorities (54 FR 21331 of May 17,
1989, and 55 FR 39220 of September 25,
1990). The project plan and subsequent
amendments were consolidated in the
final APMS plan, which became
permanent on October 21, 1997, (62 FR
54604). NIST published an amendment
on May 6, 2005 (70 FR 23996) which
became permanent on June 6, 2005.
The plan provides for modifications
to be made as experience is gained,
results are analyzed, and conclusions
are reached on how the system is
working. This notice formally modifies
the APMS plan to refine the links
between pay and performance.
Comments will be considered and any
changes deemed necessary will be
made.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: July 7, 2008.
James M. Turner,
Deputy Director.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Basis for APMS Plan Modification
III. Changes in the APMS Plan
I. Executive Summary
The National Institute of Standards
and Technology’s (NIST) Alternative
Personnel Management System (APMS)
is designed to (1) Improve hiring and
allow NIST to compete more effectively
for high-quality researchers through
direct hiring, selective use of higher
entry salaries, and selective use of
recruiting allowances; (2) motivate and
retain staff through higher pay potential,
pay-for-performance, more responsive
personnel systems, and selective use of
retention allowances; (3) strengthen the
manager’s role in personnel
management through delegation of
personnel authorities; and (4) increase
the efficiency of personnel systems
through installation of a simpler and
more flexible classification system
based on pay banding through reduction
of guidelines, steps, and paperwork in
classification, hiring, and other
personnel systems, and through
automation.
Since implementing the APMS,
according to findings in the Office of
Personnel Management’s ‘‘Summative
Evaluation Report National Institute of
Standards and Technology
Demonstration Project: 1988–1995,’’
NIST is more competitive for talent;
NIST retained more top performers than
a comparison group; and NIST managers
reported significantly more authority to
make decisions concerning employee
pay. This modification builds on this
success by refining the link between pay
and performance. In 2005, NIST made
the first significant changes to the
APMS since its inception. NIST
replaced its 100-point rating scale with
six performance ratings and provided
for automatic bonuses for high
performing pay-capped employees.
NIST also adjusted its provisions on
retention service credit for reduction in
force and annual adjustments to basic
pay to correspond with the 2005
changes.
This amendment modifies the May
2005 amendment. Specifically, NIST
will introduce a seventh level to its six
level performance ratings system,
broadening flexibility to make
performance distinctions. Pay increases
will continue to be based upon an
annually determined percentage of the
mid-point salary for each pay band in
the career path and linked directly to
E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM
15JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40499-40500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16153]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-557-813]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia: Notice of
Rescission of Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests by interested parties, the Department
of Commerce (Department) initiated an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from
Malaysia with respect to three producers/exporters of the subject
merchandise. The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2006, through July
31, 2007. The Department is now rescinding this administrative review
in its entirety.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 15, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lyn Johnson or Richard Rimlinger, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5287 and (202) 482-4477, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 6, 2008, the Department published a Notice of Partial
Rescission of the Administrative Review and Intent to Rescind the
Administrative Review, 73 FR 24941 (May 6, 2008) (Intent to Rescind),
where it rescinded the review of the antidumping duty order on PRCBs
from Malaysia with respect to King Pac and announced its intent to
rescind the review with respect to Euro Plastics Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. and
its affiliate Eplastics Procurement Center Sdn. Bhd. (Euro Plastics)
and with respect to Zhin Hin Plastic Manufacturer Sdn. Bhd. (also known
as Chin Hin Plastic Manufacture) (Zhin Hin).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this antidumping duty order is PRCBs
which may be referred to as t-shirt sacks, merchandise bags, grocery
bags, or checkout bags. The subject merchandise is defined as non-
sealable sacks and bags with handles (including drawstrings), without
zippers or integral extruded closures, with or without gussets, with or
without printing, of polyethylene film having a thickness no greater
than 0.035 inch (0.889 mm) and no less than 0.00035 inch (0.00889 mm),
and with no length or width shorter than 6 inches (15.24 cm) or longer
than 40 inches (101.6 cm). The depth of the bag may be shorter than 6
inches (15.24 cm) but not longer than 40 inches (101.6 cm).
PRCBs are typically provided without any consumer packaging and
free of charge by retail establishments, e.g., grocery, drug,
convenience, department, specialty retail, discount stores, and
restaurants, to their customers to package and carry their purchased
products. The scope of the order excludes (1) polyethylene bags that
are not printed with logos or store names and that are closeable with
drawstrings made of polyethylene film and (2) polyethylene bags that
are packed in consumer packaging with printing that
[[Page 40500]]
refers to specific end-uses other than packaging and carrying
merchandise from retail establishments, e.g., garbage bags, lawn bags,
trash-can liners.Imports of the subject merchandise are currently
classifiable under statistical category 3923.21.0085 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Furthermore, although the
HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.
Rescission of the Administrative Review
In Intent to Rescind, 73 FR at 24942, we gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment by June 5, 2008. We did not receive any
comments. Therefore, consistent with Intent to Rescind, we continue to
find that Euro Plastics and Zhin Hin (the only remaining companies in
this review) had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR.
Accordingly, we are rescinding this administrative review in its
entirety pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 08, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-16153 Filed 7-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S