Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Relating to Section 31 Accumulated Funds, 40413-40415 [E8-15816]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 135 / Monday, July 14, 2008 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58108; File No. SR–NYSE–
2007–64]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1,
Relating to Section 31 Accumulated
Funds
July 7, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 12,
2007, the New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by the Exchange.
On June 26, 2008, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change. The Commission is publishing
this notice and order to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons and to approve
the proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated
basis.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt
Supplementary Material .30 to NYSE
Rule 440H (‘‘Activity Assessment Fee’’)
to allow member firms to voluntarily
submit, during a six-month period after
the effective date of this rule proposal,
funds previously accumulated by
member firms to satisfy their, and
subsequently NYSE’s, obligation to
remit SEC Section 31-related fees, to the
Exchange. In addition, a member or
member organization may designate all
or part of any accumulated excess held
by the Exchange and allocated to such
member or member organization to be
used by the Exchange in accordance
with the terms of proposed
Supplementary Material .30. Finally, to
the extent the payment of these
historically accumulated funds or
Exchange-accumulated excess is in
excess of the fees due the Commission
from NYSE under Section 31 of the
Act,3 such surplus shall be used by the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78ee.
Exchange to offset Exchange regulatory
costs.
The text of the proposed rule changes
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.nyse.com), at the
Exchange’s principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change. The text of
these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item III below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Pursuant to Section 31 of the Act and
Rule 31 thereunder,4 national securities
exchanges and associations
(collectively, ‘‘self-regulatory
organizations’’ or ‘‘SROs’’) are required
to pay a transaction fee to the SEC that
is designed to recover the costs related
to the government’s supervision and
regulation of the securities markets and
securities professionals. To offset this
obligation, the Exchange assesses its
members and member organizations an
Activity Assessment Fee in accordance
with NYSE Rule 440H. NYSE Rule 440H
requires members and member
organizations effecting ‘‘covered sales’’
(as defined in Section 31 of the Act) of
securities on the Exchange to pay
Activity Assessment Fees based upon
their covered sales. The Exchange
calculates such fees by multiplying the
aggregate dollar amount of covered sales
effected on the Exchange during the
appropriate period by the Section 31(b)
fee rate in effect during that period.
Clearing members may in turn seek to
charge a fee to their customers or
correspondent firms. Any allocation of
the fee between the clearing member
and its correspondent firm or customer
is the responsibility of the clearing
member.
Reconciling the amounts billed by the
Exchange and the amounts collected
from the customers historically had
been difficult for member firms, causing
surpluses to accumulate at some brokerdealer firms (referred to herein as
2 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 Jul 11, 2008
4 17
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
CFR 240.31.
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40413
‘‘accumulated funds’’). These
accumulated funds were not remitted to
NYSE by certain firms, despite the fact
that these charges may have been
previously identified as ‘‘Section 31
Fees’’ or ‘‘SEC Fees’’ by the firms.5 In
addition, prior to direct billing of
members and member organizations of
Activity Assessment Fees as of June 1,
2005, the Exchange utilized ‘‘selfreporting’’ on Form 120–A of amounts
payable under Rule 440H, and the
Exchange has accumulated amounts so
paid in excess of amounts paid by the
Exchange to the SEC pursuant to
Section 31 of the Act (‘‘Exchange
accumulated excess’’).
In November 2004, the Exchange and
other SROs received a letter from the
SEC’s Division of Market Regulation 6
requesting, among other things, that the
Exchange conduct an analysis to
ascertain the amount of accumulated
funds and present a plan for brokerdealers to dispose of or otherwise
resolve title to such accumulated funds.
Following discussion among the SROs
and staff of the Division of Market
Regulation, in an effort to ascertain the
amount of accumulated funds, NASD
surveyed 240 member clearing and selfclearing firms to review their practices
regarding the collection of such fees
from customers. After compiling and
analyzing the data provided by member
firms, NASD staff found that over half
of the firms surveyed did not have an
accumulated funds balance. NASD
worked with the other SROs to
recommend a potential solution to allow
NASD and other SRO member firms to
resolve title to the accumulated funds.
It was determined, based upon
information provided in connection
with NASD’s survey, that it would be
virtually impossible to return customerrelated accumulated funds to the
5 The SEC stated in its release adopting new Rule
31 and Rule 31T that ‘‘it is misleading to suggest
that a customer or [SRO] member incurs an
obligation to the Commission under Section 31.’’
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49928
(June 28, 2004), 69 FR 41060, 41072 (July 7, 2004).
In response to this statement, the Exchange
amended Rule 440H to refer to this fee as an
‘‘Activity Assessment Fee.’’ See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 52018 (July 12, 2005), 70
FR 41467 (July 19, 2005) (SR–NYSE–2005–39). The
Exchange issued Information Memos regarding the
Exchange’s ‘‘Activity Assessment Fee’’ and the
SEC’s ‘‘Section 31 Fee’’, and provided guidance for
members and member organizations that choose to
charge their customers fees. See Information Memo
05–48 (July 19, 2005) and Information Memo 05–
36 (May 13, 2005).
6 As of November 2007, the Division of Market
Regulation was renamed the Division of Trading
and Markets.
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
40414
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 135 / Monday, July 14, 2008 / Notices
customers that had paid these funds to
the firms.7
The proposed rule change is aimed at
enabling those fees that may have been
collected for purposes of paying an
‘‘SEC Fee’’ or ‘‘Section 31 Fee’’ to be
used to pay such fees. The Exchange is
proposing new Supplementary Material
.30 to NYSE Rule 440H that will allow
firms, on a one-time-only basis,
voluntarily to remit historically
accumulated funds to the Exchange.
These funds then would be used to pay
the Exchange’s current Section 31 fees
in conformity with prior representations
made by member firms. In addition, a
member or member organization could
designate all or part of the Exchange
accumulated excess held by the
Exchange and allocated to such member
or member organization to be used by
the Exchange in accordance with the
terms of Supplementary Material .30.
Finally, to the extent the payment of
these historically accumulated funds or
Exchange accumulated excess is in
excess of the fees due the SEC from
NYSE under Section 31, such surplus
shall be used by the Exchange to offset
Exchange regulatory costs. Specifically,
the Exchange will subject such surplus
to the same treatment utilized with
respect to unused fine income that has
accumulated beyond a level reasonably
necessary for future contingencies. That
is, the board of directors of NYSE
Regulation would utilize any such
surplus to fund one or more special
projects of NYSE Regulation, to reduce
fees charged by NYSE Regulation to its
member organizations or the markets
that it serves, or for a charitable
purpose.8
The Exchange proposes that the
effective date of the proposed rule
change be the date on which any
Commission order approving the
proposed rule change is published in
the Federal Register. In addition,
Supplementary Material .30 to Rule
440H would automatically sunset six
months after the effective date.9
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
7 NASD
had asked all surveyed firms whether
they could ‘‘identify and relate the funds to specific
customers on a transaction by transaction basis.’’
The surveyed firms universally stated that tracking
fractions of a penny to individual customers would
be impossible and any over-collections could not be
passed back at the customer level. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 55886 (June 8, 2007), 72
FR 32935 (June 14, 2007) (Order approving SR–
NASD–2007–027).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55003
(December 22, 2006), 71 FR 78497 (December 29,
2007) (SR–NYSE–2006–109) (approved in
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55216 (January
31, 2007), 72 FR 5779 (February 7, 2007) (relating
to NYSE Regulation policies regarding exercise of
power to fine NYSE member organizations and use
of money collected as fines).
9 The proposed effective date and sunset date of
the proposed rule change are comparable to those
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 Jul 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6 of the Act,10 in general, and
further the objectives of Section
6(b)(5),11 in particular, in that it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities,
and to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change will provide a transparent
way of addressing the issue of
accumulated funds held at the member
firm level as well as the Exchange
accumulated excess. As this proposed
rule change would automatically sunset,
it will be of limited duration. Moreover,
based on the reminder set for this in the
proposed Supplementary Material .30 to
NYSE Rule 440H and the issuance of
prior Information Memos on this matter,
the accumulation of funds that are
collected and disclosed as ‘‘Section 31
Fees’’ or ‘‘SEC Fees’’ should not reoccur.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
approved by the Commission for a similar proposed
rule change by the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’). See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
57829 (May 16, 2008), 73 FR 30173 (May 23, 2008)
(SR–Amex–2007–107).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2007–64 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2007–64. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2007–64 and should be submitted on or
before August 4, 2008.
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of the
Proposed Rule Changes
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.12 In addition, the
Commission finds good cause to
approve the proposed rule change prior
to the thirtieth day after the date of
publication of the notice of filing. The
Commission previously found similar
proposals from other SROs to be
12 In approving this rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 135 / Monday, July 14, 2008 / Notices
consistent with the Act.13 The
Commission is not aware of any issue
that should cause it to revisit those
findings or preclude the Commission
from approving the NYSE proposal on
the same basis. The Commission notes
that, because the program is voluntary,
it imposes no obligation on any NYSE
member that believes that accumulated
funds should be retained or disposed of
in another manner.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,14 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2007–
64), as modified by Amendment No. 1,
be and hereby is approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–15816 Filed 7–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58109; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2008–47]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change To Waive Retroactively
as of June 24, 2008, Certain Initial
Listing Fees for Companies
Transferring the Listing of Their
Securities From Any Other National
Securities Exchange
July 7, 2008.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on June 24,
2008, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposal from interested persons.
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57829
(May 16, 2008), 73 FR 30173 (May 23, 2008) (SR–
Amex–2007–107); Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 55886 (June 8, 2007), 72 FR 32935 (June 14,
2007) (SR–NASD–2007–027).
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 Jul 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange, through its whollyowned subsidiary NYSE Arca Equities,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’), proposes
to waive initial listing fees for
companies transferring the listing of
their equity securities from any other
national securities exchange. The
proposed fee waiver would be applied
retroactively to any companies that
apply to list after the date of initial
submission of this filing. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange’s principal office, the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
and https://www.nyse.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to waive
initial listing fees for companies
transferring the listing of their securities
from any other national securities
exchange. The waiver will apply to all
classes of securities. The Exchange had
previously waived initial listing fees in
these circumstances for all companies
that transferred from the New York
Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) at any time or
from Nasdaq Stock Market (‘‘Nasdaq’’)
or the American Stock Exchange prior to
December 31, 2007, or had applied to
list prior to that date.3 The proposed
amendment brings the Exchange’s fee
policy in line with those of the NYSE
and Nasdaq,4 both of which currently
provide fee waivers to companies
transferring from the other national
securities exchanges. The proposed fee
waiver would be applied retroactively to
any companies that apply to list after
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54007
(June 16, 2006), 71 FR 36155 (June 23, 2006) (SR–
PCX–2006–16).
4 See Section 902.02 of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual and Nasdaq Marketplace Rule IM–4500–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40415
the date of initial submission of this
filing.
Issuers of securities that qualify for
the proposed waiver of initial listing
fees will be subject to the same level of
annual fees and listing of additional
shares fees as other NYSE Arca issuers.
The proposed rule change will not affect
the Exchange’s commitment of
resources to its regulatory oversight of
the listing process or its regulatory
programs. Specifically, companies that
benefit from the waiver will be reviewed
for compliance with the Exchange
initial and continued listing standards
in the same manner as any other
company that applies to be listed on the
Exchange. The Exchange will conduct a
full and independent review of each
issuer’s compliance with the Exchange’s
initial listing standards.
The Exchange believes that the
elimination of such fees in the case of
securities transferring from other
national securities exchanges is justified
on several grounds. An issuer that
already paid initial listing fees to
another national securities exchange
when it became a publicly traded
company is reluctant to pay a second
initial listing fee to another listing
venue, even if it concludes that the
Exchange offers the issuer and its
investors superior services and market
quality. Even if an issuer concludes that
the Exchange would provide a superior
market for its stock, the benefits of the
transfer must currently be weighed
against the cost of initial inclusion.
Since the expected benefits of the
transfer would be diffused among the
issuers’ investors and realized over
time, but the initial listing fees must be
paid by the issuer immediately, the
Exchange is concerned that issuers that
stand to benefit may nevertheless opt to
forgo a transfer. As such, the Exchange
believes that assessing the initial fees
against issuers that have already paid
fees to list on another market imposes
a burden on the competition between
exchange markets and markets other
than exchange markets, a competition
that the Exchange believes is one of the
central goals of the national market
system. This concern is particularly
great in light of the fact that the
Commission has approved the waiver of
initial listing fees by Nasdaq with
respect to the listing of any security
being transferred from another national
securities exchange.5
The Exchange understands that the
effect of this proposed rule change will
be to impose a lower level of listing fees
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51004
(January 10, 2005), 70 FR 2917 (January 18, 2005)
(SR–NASD–2004–140).
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 135 (Monday, July 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40413-40415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15816]
[[Page 40413]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-58108; File No. SR-NYSE-2007-64]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Relating to Section 31
Accumulated Funds
July 7, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 12, 2007, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by
the Exchange. On June 26, 2008, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change. The Commission is publishing this notice and
order to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons and to approve the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt Supplementary Material .30 to NYSE
Rule 440H (``Activity Assessment Fee'') to allow member firms to
voluntarily submit, during a six-month period after the effective date
of this rule proposal, funds previously accumulated by member firms to
satisfy their, and subsequently NYSE's, obligation to remit SEC Section
31-related fees, to the Exchange. In addition, a member or member
organization may designate all or part of any accumulated excess held
by the Exchange and allocated to such member or member organization to
be used by the Exchange in accordance with the terms of proposed
Supplementary Material .30. Finally, to the extent the payment of these
historically accumulated funds or Exchange-accumulated excess is in
excess of the fees due the Commission from NYSE under Section 31 of the
Act,\3\ such surplus shall be used by the Exchange to offset Exchange
regulatory costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78ee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule changes is available on the
Exchange's Web site (https://www.nyse.com), at the Exchange's principal
office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Pursuant to Section 31 of the Act and Rule 31 thereunder,\4\
national securities exchanges and associations (collectively, ``self-
regulatory organizations'' or ``SROs'') are required to pay a
transaction fee to the SEC that is designed to recover the costs
related to the government's supervision and regulation of the
securities markets and securities professionals. To offset this
obligation, the Exchange assesses its members and member organizations
an Activity Assessment Fee in accordance with NYSE Rule 440H. NYSE Rule
440H requires members and member organizations effecting ``covered
sales'' (as defined in Section 31 of the Act) of securities on the
Exchange to pay Activity Assessment Fees based upon their covered
sales. The Exchange calculates such fees by multiplying the aggregate
dollar amount of covered sales effected on the Exchange during the
appropriate period by the Section 31(b) fee rate in effect during that
period. Clearing members may in turn seek to charge a fee to their
customers or correspondent firms. Any allocation of the fee between the
clearing member and its correspondent firm or customer is the
responsibility of the clearing member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 17 CFR 240.31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reconciling the amounts billed by the Exchange and the amounts
collected from the customers historically had been difficult for member
firms, causing surpluses to accumulate at some broker-dealer firms
(referred to herein as ``accumulated funds''). These accumulated funds
were not remitted to NYSE by certain firms, despite the fact that these
charges may have been previously identified as ``Section 31 Fees'' or
``SEC Fees'' by the firms.\5\ In addition, prior to direct billing of
members and member organizations of Activity Assessment Fees as of June
1, 2005, the Exchange utilized ``self-reporting'' on Form 120-A of
amounts payable under Rule 440H, and the Exchange has accumulated
amounts so paid in excess of amounts paid by the Exchange to the SEC
pursuant to Section 31 of the Act (``Exchange accumulated excess'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The SEC stated in its release adopting new Rule 31 and Rule
31T that ``it is misleading to suggest that a customer or [SRO]
member incurs an obligation to the Commission under Section 31.''
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49928 (June 28, 2004), 69 FR
41060, 41072 (July 7, 2004). In response to this statement, the
Exchange amended Rule 440H to refer to this fee as an ``Activity
Assessment Fee.'' See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52018
(July 12, 2005), 70 FR 41467 (July 19, 2005) (SR-NYSE-2005-39). The
Exchange issued Information Memos regarding the Exchange's
``Activity Assessment Fee'' and the SEC's ``Section 31 Fee'', and
provided guidance for members and member organizations that choose
to charge their customers fees. See Information Memo 05-48 (July 19,
2005) and Information Memo 05-36 (May 13, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In November 2004, the Exchange and other SROs received a letter
from the SEC's Division of Market Regulation \6\ requesting, among
other things, that the Exchange conduct an analysis to ascertain the
amount of accumulated funds and present a plan for broker-dealers to
dispose of or otherwise resolve title to such accumulated funds.
Following discussion among the SROs and staff of the Division of Market
Regulation, in an effort to ascertain the amount of accumulated funds,
NASD surveyed 240 member clearing and self-clearing firms to review
their practices regarding the collection of such fees from customers.
After compiling and analyzing the data provided by member firms, NASD
staff found that over half of the firms surveyed did not have an
accumulated funds balance. NASD worked with the other SROs to recommend
a potential solution to allow NASD and other SRO member firms to
resolve title to the accumulated funds. It was determined, based upon
information provided in connection with NASD's survey, that it would be
virtually impossible to return customer-related accumulated funds to
the
[[Page 40414]]
customers that had paid these funds to the firms.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ As of November 2007, the Division of Market Regulation was
renamed the Division of Trading and Markets.
\7\ NASD had asked all surveyed firms whether they could
``identify and relate the funds to specific customers on a
transaction by transaction basis.'' The surveyed firms universally
stated that tracking fractions of a penny to individual customers
would be impossible and any over-collections could not be passed
back at the customer level. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
55886 (June 8, 2007), 72 FR 32935 (June 14, 2007) (Order approving
SR-NASD-2007-027).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change is aimed at enabling those fees that may
have been collected for purposes of paying an ``SEC Fee'' or ``Section
31 Fee'' to be used to pay such fees. The Exchange is proposing new
Supplementary Material .30 to NYSE Rule 440H that will allow firms, on
a one-time-only basis, voluntarily to remit historically accumulated
funds to the Exchange. These funds then would be used to pay the
Exchange's current Section 31 fees in conformity with prior
representations made by member firms. In addition, a member or member
organization could designate all or part of the Exchange accumulated
excess held by the Exchange and allocated to such member or member
organization to be used by the Exchange in accordance with the terms of
Supplementary Material .30.
Finally, to the extent the payment of these historically
accumulated funds or Exchange accumulated excess is in excess of the
fees due the SEC from NYSE under Section 31, such surplus shall be used
by the Exchange to offset Exchange regulatory costs. Specifically, the
Exchange will subject such surplus to the same treatment utilized with
respect to unused fine income that has accumulated beyond a level
reasonably necessary for future contingencies. That is, the board of
directors of NYSE Regulation would utilize any such surplus to fund one
or more special projects of NYSE Regulation, to reduce fees charged by
NYSE Regulation to its member organizations or the markets that it
serves, or for a charitable purpose.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55003 (December 22,
2006), 71 FR 78497 (December 29, 2007) (SR-NYSE-2006-109) (approved
in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55216 (January 31, 2007), 72
FR 5779 (February 7, 2007) (relating to NYSE Regulation policies
regarding exercise of power to fine NYSE member organizations and
use of money collected as fines).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes that the effective date of the proposed rule
change be the date on which any Commission order approving the proposed
rule change is published in the Federal Register. In addition,
Supplementary Material .30 to Rule 440H would automatically sunset six
months after the effective date.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The proposed effective date and sunset date of the proposed
rule change are comparable to those approved by the Commission for a
similar proposed rule change by the American Stock Exchange LLC
(``Amex''). See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57829 (May 16,
2008), 73 FR 30173 (May 23, 2008) (SR-Amex-2007-107).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6 of the Act,\10\ in general, and further the objectives
of Section 6(b)(5),\11\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change will provide a transparent way of addressing
the issue of accumulated funds held at the member firm level as well as
the Exchange accumulated excess. As this proposed rule change would
automatically sunset, it will be of limited duration. Moreover, based
on the reminder set for this in the proposed Supplementary Material .30
to NYSE Rule 440H and the issuance of prior Information Memos on this
matter, the accumulation of funds that are collected and disclosed as
``Section 31 Fees'' or ``SEC Fees'' should not reoccur.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2007-64 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2007-64. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of
the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSE-2007-64 and should be submitted on or before August 4, 2008.
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Changes
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\12\ In addition, the Commission finds good cause to approve
the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of
publication of the notice of filing. The Commission previously found
similar proposals from other SROs to be
[[Page 40415]]
consistent with the Act.\13\ The Commission is not aware of any issue
that should cause it to revisit those findings or preclude the
Commission from approving the NYSE proposal on the same basis. The
Commission notes that, because the program is voluntary, it imposes no
obligation on any NYSE member that believes that accumulated funds
should be retained or disposed of in another manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ In approving this rule change, the Commission notes that it
has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57829 (May 16,
2008), 73 FR 30173 (May 23, 2008) (SR-Amex-2007-107); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 55886 (June 8, 2007), 72 FR 32935 (June 14,
2007) (SR-NASD-2007-027).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\14\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2007-64), as modified
by Amendment No. 1, be and hereby is approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-15816 Filed 7-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P