In the Matter of Certain Buffer Systems and Components Thereof Used in Container Processing Lines; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating Two Respondents From the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement and License Agreement; Termination of Investigation, 39717 [E8-15634]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 133 / Thursday, July 10, 2008 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–609]
In the Matter of Certain Buffer Systems
and Components Thereof Used in
Container Processing Lines; Notice of
a Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating Two Respondents From
the Investigation on the Basis of a
Settlement Agreement and License
Agreement; Termination of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 26) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) in the
above-captioned investigation
terminating two respondents on the
basis of a settlement agreement and
license agreement and terminating the
investigation.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3041. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on July 5, 2007, under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed
by Sidel Participations of France, Sidel
Canada Inc. of Canada, and Sidel Inc. of
Norcross, Georgia. Complainants
supplemented their complaint on June
18, 2007. The respondents named in the
complaint are Krones AG and KHS AG
of Germany; Krones Inc., of Franklin,
Wisconsin; and KHS USA, Inc. of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Jul 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
Waukesha, Wisconsin. The complaint,
as supplemented, alleged violations of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain buffer
systems and components thereof used in
container processing lines by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent No.
6,168,005. The complaint further
alleged that a domestic industry exists
in the United States as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The
complainants request that the
Commission issue a general exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
On May 28, 2008, complainants and
the two remaining respondents, KHS
AG and KHS USA, Inc. (collectively
‘‘KHS’’), filed a joint motion pursuant to
Commission rule 210.21 for termination
of the investigation based upon a
settlement agreement and license
agreement. The Commission
investigative attorney filed a response in
support of the motion.
On June 11, 2008, the ALJ issued the
subject ID, granting the joint motion and
terminating the investigation with
respect to KHS on the basis of the
settlement agreement and license
agreement. No petitions for review were
filed and the Commission has
determined not to review the subject ID.
The investigation is terminated.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,
and Commission rules 210.21, 210.42,
19 CFR 210.21, 210.42.
Issued: July 3, 2008.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–15634 Filed 7–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–618]
In the Matter of: Certain Computer
Systems, Printers and Scanners;
Notice of Commission Determination
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation on the
Basis of a Settlement Agreement
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39717
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 13) granting a joint
motion to terminate the captioned
investigation based on a settlement
agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2301. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E.
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 3, 2007, the Commission
instituted an investigation under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.
1337, based on a complaint filed by
Acer Incorporated (‘‘Acer’’) of Taipei,
Taiwan, as supplemented, alleging a
violation of section 337 in the
importation, sale for importation, and
sale within the United States after
importation of certain computer
systems, printers and scanners by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,214,761 and
5,581,122. 72 FR 67960 (December 3,
2007). The complainant named HewlettPackard Company (‘‘HP’’) of Palo Alto,
California, as respondent.
On June 6, 2008, Acer and HP jointly
moved to terminate the investigation on
the basis of a settlement agreement. On
June 16, 2008, the Commission
investigative attorney filed a response
supporting the motion.
On June 17, 2008, the ALJ issued the
subject ID granting the joint motion to
terminate the investigation based on the
settlement agreement. The ALJ found
that the motion complied with the
requirements of Commission Rule
210.21(b) by including copies of the
settlement agreement and a statement
that there are no other agreements,
written or oral, express or implied,
between the parties concerning the
subject matter of the investigation. The
ALJ concluded, pursuant to Commission
Rule 210.50(b)(2), that there is no
evidence that termination of this
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 133 (Thursday, July 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 39717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15634]
[[Page 39717]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-609]
In the Matter of Certain Buffer Systems and Components Thereof
Used in Container Processing Lines; Notice of a Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating Two
Respondents From the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement
Agreement and License Agreement; Termination of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 26) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') in the above-captioned investigation terminating two
respondents on the basis of a settlement agreement and license
agreement and terminating the investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3041. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on July 5, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed by Sidel
Participations of France, Sidel Canada Inc. of Canada, and Sidel Inc.
of Norcross, Georgia. Complainants supplemented their complaint on June
18, 2007. The respondents named in the complaint are Krones AG and KHS
AG of Germany; Krones Inc., of Franklin, Wisconsin; and KHS USA, Inc.
of Waukesha, Wisconsin. The complaint, as supplemented, alleged
violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain buffer systems and components thereof used in
container processing lines by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No.
6,168,005. The complaint further alleged that a domestic industry
exists in the United States as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337. The complainants request that the Commission issue a general
exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
On May 28, 2008, complainants and the two remaining respondents,
KHS AG and KHS USA, Inc. (collectively ``KHS''), filed a joint motion
pursuant to Commission rule 210.21 for termination of the investigation
based upon a settlement agreement and license agreement. The Commission
investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion.
On June 11, 2008, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the joint
motion and terminating the investigation with respect to KHS on the
basis of the settlement agreement and license agreement. No petitions
for review were filed and the Commission has determined not to review
the subject ID. The investigation is terminated.
This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rules
210.21, 210.42, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42.
Issued: July 3, 2008.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-15634 Filed 7-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P