Safety Zone; Citron Energy Drink Offshore Challenge, Lake St. Clair, Harrison Township, MI, 35987-35990 [E8-14372]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the Eighth
Coast Guard District Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
above. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:14 Jun 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35987
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f),
and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is not
likely to have a significant effect on the
human environment because it simply
promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
Add new § 117.468 to read as follows:
§ 117.468
LaLoutre Bayou.
The draw of the LA 46 Bridge, mile
22.9, at Yscloskey, shall open on signal;
except that from 8 p.m. to 4 a.m., the
draw shall open on signal if at least two
hours notice is given.
Dated: June 16, 2008.
J. R. Whitehead,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E8–14367 Filed 6–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2008–0451]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Citron Energy Drink
Offshore Challenge, Lake St. Clair,
Harrison Township, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary safety zone on
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
35988
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Lake St. Clair, Harrison Township,
Michigan. This zone is intended to
restrict vessels from portions of Lake St.
Clair during the Citron Energy Drink
Offshore Challenge. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with powerboat races.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
July 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2008–0451 to the Docket
Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://www.regulation.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call LT Jeff Ahlgren, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Detroit, 110 Mount Elliot Ave., Detroit,
MI, 48207, (313) 568–9580. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to use the Docket Management Facility.
Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’
paragraph below.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–0451),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you
include your name, mailing address,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:31 Jun 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
and an e-mail address or other contact
information in the body of your
document to ensure that you can be
identified as the submitter. This also
allows us to contact you in the event
further information is needed or if there
are questions. For example, if we cannot
read your submission due to technical
difficulties and you cannot be
contacted; your submission may not be
considered. You may submit your
comments and material by electronic
means, mail, fax, or delivery to the
Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES; but please
submit your comments and material by
only one means. If you submit them by
mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Enter the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–0451) in the
search box, and click ‘‘go’’. You may
also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the DOT West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays; or the U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Detroit, 110 Mount
Elliot Ave., Detroit, MI, 48207, between
8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation’s Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Detroit at the address
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels
and spectators from hazards associated
with a powerboat race. The Captain of
the Port Detroit has determined
powerboat races in close proximity to
watercraft and infrastructure pose
significant risk to public safety and
property. The likely combination of
large numbers of recreation vessels,
powerboats traveling at high speeds,
possible alcohol use, and large numbers
of spectators in close proximity to the
water could easily result in serious
injuries or fatalities. Establishing a
safety zone around the location of the
race course will help ensure the safety
of persons and property at these events
and help minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is intended to
ensure safety of the public and vessels
during the setup, course familiarization,
testing and race in conjunction with the
Citron Energy Drink Offshore Challenge.
The powerboat race and associated
testing will occur between 12 p.m., July
18, 2008 and 5 p.m., July 20, 2008. The
safety zone will be effective from 12
p.m. to 4 p.m. on July 18 and 19, 2008,
and from 12 p.m. to 5 p.m. on July 20,
2008.
The safety zone will encompass all
U.S. waters of Lake St. Clair, Harrison
Township, MI, bound by a line
extending from a point in Lake St. Clair
located at position 082°48′45″ W;
42°34′05″ N, east to position 082°47′45″
W; 42°34′04″ N, southeast to position
082°47′03″ W; 42°33′38″ N, southwest to
position 082°48′32″ W; 42°32′35″ N,
south to position 082°49′53″ W;
42°32′08″ N, northwest to position
082°50′27″ W; 42°32′30″ N, and
northeast to the point of origin at
position 082°48′45″ W; 42°34′05″ N.
(DATUM: NAD 83).
The Captain of the Port will cause
notice of enforcement of the safety zone
established by this section to be made
by all appropriate means to the affected
segments of the public. Such means of
notification will include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and Local Notice to Mariners. The
Captain of the Port will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying
the public when enforcement of the
safety zone is terminated.
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary.
This determination is based on the
minimal time that vessels will be
restricted from the zone and the zone is
an area where the Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from the zone’s activation.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the above portion of Lake St. Clair
between 12 p.m. and 4 p.m. on July 18
and 19, 2008, and between 12 p.m. and
5 p.m. on July 20, 2008.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule will be
in effect for approximately four hours
each day of testing and five hours the
day of the race. In the event that this
temporary safety zone affects shipping,
commercial vessels may request
permission from the Captain of the Port
Detroit to transit through the safety
zone. The Coast Guard will give notice
to the public via a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners that the regulation is in effect.
Additionally, the COTP will suspend
enforcement of the safety zone if the
event for which the zone is established
ends earlier than the expected time.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:31 Jun 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LT Jeff
Ahlgren, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Detroit, 110 Mount
Elliot Ave., Detroit, MI 48207; (313)
568–9580. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35989
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty
rights of Native American Tribes.
Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed
to working with Tribal Governments to
implement local policies and to mitigate
tribal concerns. We have determined
that these regulations and fishing rights
protection need not be incompatible.
We have also determined that this
Proposed Rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Nevertheless, Indian tribes that have
questions concerning the provisions of
this Proposed Rule or options for
compliance are encouraged to contact
the point of contact listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
35990
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Proposed Rules
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guide the Coast Guard
in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is not likely to have a
significant effect on the human
environment. A preliminary
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
bound by a line extending from a point
in Lake St. Clair located at position
082°48′45″ W; 42°34′05″ N, east to
position 082°47′45″ W; 42°34′04″ N,
southeast to position 082°47′03″ W;
42°33′38″ N, southwest to position
082°48′32″ W; 42°32′35″ N, south to
position 082°49′53″ W; 42°32′08″ N,
northwest to position 082°50′27″ W;
42°32′30″ N, and northeast to the point
of origin at position 082°48′45″ W;
42°34′05″ N. (DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This regulation is
effective from 12 p.m. on July 18, 2008
through 5 p.m. on July 20, 2008.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Detroit, or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Detroit or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Detroit
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 11, 2008.
P.W. Brennan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. E8–14372 Filed 6–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
2. Section 165.T09–0451 is added to
read as follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
I
§ 165.T09–0451 Safety Zone; Citron
Energy Drink Offshore Challenge, Lake St.
Clair, Harrison Township, MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: all U.S. waters of
Lake St. Clair, Harrison Township, MI,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:31 Jun 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2006–0406, FRL–8684–7]
RIN 2060–AM74
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source
Category: Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to amend
the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source
Category: Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities, which EPA promulgated on
January 10, 2008, and amended on
March 7, 2008. The January 10, 2008
rule established national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants
for the facilities in the gasoline
distribution (Stage I) area source
category. This action only affects area
source gasoline dispensing facilities
with a monthly throughput of 100,000
gallons of gasoline or more. In this
action, EPA is proposing to amend the
pressure and vacuum vent valve
cracking pressure and leak rate
requirements for vapor balance systems
used to control emissions from gasoline
storage tanks at gasoline dispensing
facilities. Newly constructed or
reconstructed gasoline dispensing
facilities must comply with the new
vapor balance system requirements as
explained in the parallel direct final
rule published in today’s Regulations
and Rules section of this Federal
Register.
DATES: Comments. Written comments
must be received on or before August
11, 2008.
Public Hearing. If anyone contacts
EPA requesting to speak at a public
hearing by July 7, 2008, a public hearing
will be held on July 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2006–0406, by mail to Air and
Radiation Docket (2822T), 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Please include a
total of two copies. Comments may also
be submitted electronically or through
hand delivery/courier by following the
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES
section of the direct final rule located in
the rules section of this Federal
Register.
We request that you also send a
separate copy of each comment to the
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 25, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35987-35990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14372]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2008-0451]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Citron Energy Drink Offshore Challenge, Lake St.
Clair, Harrison Township, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
on
[[Page 35988]]
Lake St. Clair, Harrison Township, Michigan. This zone is intended to
restrict vessels from portions of Lake St. Clair during the Citron
Energy Drink Offshore Challenge. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect spectators and vessels from the hazards associated
with powerboat races.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before July 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2008-0451 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
(1) Online: https://www.regulation.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground Floor of the West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202-366-9329.
(4) Fax: 202-493-2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call LT Jeff Ahlgren, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Detroit, 110 Mount Elliot Ave., Detroit, MI, 48207, (313) 568-
9580. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management
Facility. Please see DOT's ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-0451), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you include your name, mailing address, and
an e-mail address or other contact information in the body of your
document to ensure that you can be identified as the submitter. This
also allows us to contact you in the event further information is
needed or if there are questions. For example, if we cannot read your
submission due to technical difficulties and you cannot be contacted;
your submission may not be considered. You may submit your comments and
material by electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery to the Docket
Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES; but please submit
your comments and material by only one means. If you submit them by
mail or delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/
2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached the
Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov at
any time. Enter the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG-2008-0451)
in the search box, and click ``go''. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays; or the
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Detroit, 110 Mount Elliot Ave., Detroit, MI,
48207, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of
Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to U.S. Coast Guard Sector Detroit at
the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and spectators from hazards associated with a powerboat race.
The Captain of the Port Detroit has determined powerboat races in close
proximity to watercraft and infrastructure pose significant risk to
public safety and property. The likely combination of large numbers of
recreation vessels, powerboats traveling at high speeds, possible
alcohol use, and large numbers of spectators in close proximity to the
water could easily result in serious injuries or fatalities.
Establishing a safety zone around the location of the race course will
help ensure the safety of persons and property at these events and help
minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is intended to ensure safety of the public and
vessels during the setup, course familiarization, testing and race in
conjunction with the Citron Energy Drink Offshore Challenge. The
powerboat race and associated testing will occur between 12 p.m., July
18, 2008 and 5 p.m., July 20, 2008. The safety zone will be effective
from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. on July 18 and 19, 2008, and from 12 p.m. to 5
p.m. on July 20, 2008.
The safety zone will encompass all U.S. waters of Lake St. Clair,
Harrison Township, MI, bound by a line extending from a point in Lake
St. Clair located at position 082[deg]48'45'' W; 42[deg]34'05'' N, east
to position 082[deg]47'45'' W; 42[deg]34'04'' N, southeast to position
082[deg]47'03'' W; 42[deg]33'38'' N, southwest to position
082[deg]48'32'' W; 42[deg]32'35'' N, south to position 082[deg]49'53''
W; 42[deg]32'08'' N, northwest to position 082[deg]50'27'' W;
42[deg]32'30'' N, and northeast to the point of origin at position
082[deg]48'45'' W; 42[deg]34'05'' N. (DATUM: NAD 83).
The Captain of the Port will cause notice of enforcement of the
safety zone established by this section to be made by all appropriate
means to the affected segments of the public. Such means of
notification will include, but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners. The Captain of the Port will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying the public when
enforcement of the safety zone is terminated.
[[Page 35989]]
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will
be restricted from the zone and the zone is an area where the Coast
Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the zone's
activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the above portion of Lake St. Clair between 12 p.m. and 4
p.m. on July 18 and 19, 2008, and between 12 p.m. and 5 p.m. on July
20, 2008.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will be in effect for approximately four hours each day of testing
and five hours the day of the race. In the event that this temporary
safety zone affects shipping, commercial vessels may request permission
from the Captain of the Port Detroit to transit through the safety
zone. The Coast Guard will give notice to the public via a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners that the regulation is in effect. Additionally, the
COTP will suspend enforcement of the safety zone if the event for which
the zone is established ends earlier than the expected time.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LT Jeff Ahlgren, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Detroit, 110 Mount Elliot Ave.,
Detroit, MI 48207; (313) 568-9580. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty rights of Native American
Tribes. Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed to working with Tribal
Governments to implement local policies and to mitigate tribal
concerns. We have determined that these regulations and fishing rights
protection need not be incompatible. We have also determined that this
Proposed Rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Nevertheless, Indian
tribes that have questions concerning the provisions of this Proposed
Rule or options for compliance are encouraged to contact the point of
contact listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
[[Page 35990]]
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is not likely to
have a significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Section 165.T09-0451 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0451 Safety Zone; Citron Energy Drink Offshore
Challenge, Lake St. Clair, Harrison Township, MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: all
U.S. waters of Lake St. Clair, Harrison Township, MI, bound by a line
extending from a point in Lake St. Clair located at position
082[deg]48'45'' W; 42[deg]34'05'' N, east to position 082[deg]47'45''
W; 42[deg]34'04'' N, southeast to position 082[deg]47'03'' W;
42[deg]33'38'' N, southwest to position 082[deg]48'32'' W;
42[deg]32'35'' N, south to position 082[deg]49'53'' W; 42[deg]32'08''
N, northwest to position 082[deg]50'27'' W; 42[deg]32'30'' N, and
northeast to the point of origin at position 082[deg]48'45'' W;
42[deg]34'05'' N. (DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This regulation is effective from 12 p.m. on
July 18, 2008 through 5 p.m. on July 20, 2008.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Detroit, or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Detroit or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 11, 2008.
P.W. Brennan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. E8-14372 Filed 6-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P