JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Asset Management Fiduciary Administration-Court Accounting, Troy, MI; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 35166-35167 [E8-13977]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
35166
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 120 / Friday, June 20, 2008 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
[TAA petitions instituted between 6/2/08 and 6/6/08]
TA–W
63458
63459
63460
63461
63462
63463
63464
63465
63466
63467
63468
63469
63470
63471
63472
63473
63474
63475
63476
63477
63478
63479
63480
63481
63482
63483
63484
63485
63486
63487
63488
63489
63490
63491
63492
63493
63494
63495
63496
63497
63498
Location
Excello Engineered Systems (Comp) ..................................................
Chaco, Inc. (Comp) ..............................................................................
AS America (USWA) ............................................................................
Logistic Services, Inc. (LSI) (UAW) .....................................................
Carthage Fabrics, Inc. (Wkrs) ..............................................................
Sun Chemical Company (State) ..........................................................
Dura Automotive Systems (Comp) ......................................................
Sara Campbell, Ltd (Comp) .................................................................
Citation Corporation (Comp) ................................................................
JM Eagle (State) ..................................................................................
Circor Instrumentation Technologies (State) .......................................
Ladeer Metal Stamping (Wkrs) ............................................................
Intelicoat Technologies (Wkrs) ............................................................
Appleton Coate (Wkrs) ........................................................................
Sandberg and Sikorski (Wkrs) .............................................................
Whyco Finishing Technologies, LLC (State) .......................................
Anderson Independent Mail (Wkrs) .....................................................
Biosense Webster (Wkrs) ....................................................................
Indalex, Inc. (Union) .............................................................................
Kwikset Corporation (Comp) ................................................................
Aleris Rolled Products (Rep) ...............................................................
S. U.S. Cast Products, Inc. (Wkrs) ......................................................
Mitsubishi Kagaku Imaging Corporation (Comp) .................................
Compucom Sytems, Inc.—Help Desk (Comp) ....................................
Northridge Mills (State) ........................................................................
Southern Industrial Fabrics (Comp) .....................................................
Paul Winston Eurostar, LLC (Comp) ...................................................
Trans-Ocean Products, Inc. (Comp) ....................................................
Grapevine Staffing, LLC (State) ..........................................................
Occidental Chemical Corporation (Comp) ...........................................
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (Comp) ...................................
Weastec, Inc. (Wkrs) ...........................................................................
Tenneco (Union) ..................................................................................
Sensus Metering (Wkrs) ......................................................................
Beverage Air (State) ............................................................................
Evergy, Inc. (Comp) .............................................................................
Master Industries, Inc. (Comp) ............................................................
Nova Knits (Wkrs) ................................................................................
A. B. Boyd Corporation (Union) ...........................................................
Decoro USA, Ltd (Comp) .....................................................................
Westland Controls (State) ....................................................................
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
Macedonia, OH ...........
Paonia, CO .................
Salem, OH ..................
Janesville, WI ..............
Carthage, NC ..............
North Haven, CT .........
Galdwin, MI .................
Boston, MA .................
Butler, IN .....................
Hastings, NE ...............
Spartanburg, SC .........
Ladeer, MI ...................
Portland, OR ...............
Combined Locks, WI ...
New York, NY .............
Thomaston, CT ...........
Anderson, SC ..............
Irwinday, CA ................
Modesto, CA ...............
Denison, TX ................
Bedford, OH ................
Logansport, IN ............
Chesapeake, VA .........
Parsippany, NJ ............
San Fernando, CA ......
Rossville, GA ...............
New York, NY .............
Salem, OR ..................
Creston, IA ..................
Muscle Shoals, AL ......
Lee, MA .......................
Seaman, OH ...............
Milan, OH ....................
Uniontown, PA ............
Spartanburg, SC .........
Pawtucket, RI ..............
Ansonia, OH ................
San Francisco, CA ......
Chino, CA ....................
High Point, NC ............
Westland, MI ...............
[FR Doc. E8–13972 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–63,193]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan
Asset Management Fiduciary
Administration—Court Accounting,
Troy, MI; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated June 6, 2008, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Date of
institution
Subject firm (petitioners)
16:53 Jun 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
and former workers of the subject firm.
The denial notice was signed on May
13, 2008 and published in the Federal
Register on May 29, 2008 (73 FR 30978).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative TAA determination
issued by the Department for workers of
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Asset
Management, Fiduciary
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
06/02/08
06/02/08
06/02/08
06/02/08
06/03/08
06/03/08
06/03/08
06/03/08
06/03/08
06/03/08
06/03/08
06/03/08
06/03/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
06/06/08
06/06/08
06/06/08
06/06/08
06/06/08
06/06/08
06/06/08
06/06/08
Date of
petition
05/30/08
05/31/08
05/30/08
05/30/08
05/28/08
06/02/08
05/30/08
06/02/08
06/02/08
06/02/08
06/02/08
06/01/08
06/02/08
06/03/08
05/29/08
06/03/08
05/23/08
06/03/08
06/03/08
06/02/08
06/02/08
06/02/08
05/20/08
05/29/08
05/22/08
05/27/08
05/23/08
05/29/08
06/03/08
05/30/08
06/02/08
06/04/08
06/04/08
06/05/08
06/06/08
06/05/08
06/05/08
05/23/08
06/05/08
05/26/08
06/02/08
Administration—Court Accounting,
Troy, Michigan was based on the
finding that the worker group does not
produce an article within the meaning
of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The petitioner states that employment
at the subject firm was negatively
impacted by a shift of job functions to
India. The petitioner also states that
regardless of whether the workers of the
subject firm produce a product or
provide services, they should be
certified eligible for Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
The investigation revealed that the
workers of JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP
Morgan Asset Management, Fiduciary
Administration—Court Accounting,
Troy, Michigan are engaged in preparing
trust and account transaction histories,
and asset inventory lists for various
county courts and/or other clients.
These functions, as described above, are
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 120 / Friday, June 20, 2008 / Notices
not considered production of an article
within the meaning of Section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
The allegation of a shift to another
country might be relevant if it was
determined that workers of the subject
firm produced an article. Since the
investigation determined that workers of
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Asset
Management, Fiduciary
Administration—Court Accounting,
Troy, Michigan do not produce an
article, there cannot be imports nor a
shift in production of an ‘‘article’’
abroad within the meaning of the Trade
Act of 1974 in this instance.
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of
June 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–13977 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
apply for worker adjustment assistance
and alternative trade adjustment
assistance under amended petition
number TA–W–61,265, which does not
expire until May 16, 2009.
Consequently, further investigation in
this case would serve no purpose and
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
June 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–13971 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
Application for a License To Export
Major Components for Nuclear
Reactors
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–63,417]
Greene Plastics Corporation, Hope
Valley, RI; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on May 21,
2008 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
of Greene Plastics Corporation, Hope
Valley, Rhode Island.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of
June 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–13979 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
[TA–W–63,463
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Grapevine Staffing, LLC, Workers OnSite at O’Bryan Brothers Incorporated,
Leon, IA; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on June 5,
2008, in response to a petition filed by
a State agency representative on behalf
of workers of Grapevine Staffing, LLC,
working on-site at O’Bryan Brothers
Incorporated, Leon, Iowa.
The petitioning worker group is
covered by a certification of eligibility to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jun 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–63,486]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of
June 2008.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–13980 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
W–63,301) which expires on May 16,
2010. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose, and the investigation has
been terminated.
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
35167
Sun Chemical Company, North Haven,
CT; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on June 3,
2008, in response to a worker petition
filed by a state workforce official on
behalf of workers of Sun Chemical
Company employed on-site at the North
Haven, Connecticut location of
Quebecor World Northeast Graphics,
Inc.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active certification, (TA–
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pursuant to 10 CFR 110.70 (b)(1)
‘‘Public Notice of Receipt of an
Application,’’ please take notice that the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
has received the following request for an
export license. Copies of the request are
available electronically through ADAMS
and can be accessed through the Public
Electronic Reading Room (PERR) link
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html at
the NRC Homepage.
A request for a hearing or petition for
leave to intervene may be filed within
thirty days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. Any
request for hearing or petition for leave
to intervene shall be served by the
requestor or petitioner upon the
applicant, the Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555;
the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555;
and the Executive Secretary, U.S.
Department of State, Washington, DC
20520.
A request for a hearing or petition for
leave to intervene may be filed with the
NRC electronically in accordance with
NRC’s E-Filing rule promulgated in
August 2007, 72 FR 49139 (Aug. 28,
2007). Information about filing
electronically is available on the NRC’s
public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/e-submittals.html. To ensure
timely electronic filing, at least five days
prior to the filing deadline, the
petitioner/requestor should contact the
Office of the Secretary by e-mail at
HEARINGDOCKET@NRC.GOV, or by
calling (301) 415–1677, to request a
digital ID certificate and allow for the
creation of an electronic docket.
In addition to a request for hearing or
petition for leave to intervene, written
comments, in accordance with 10 CFR
110.81 should be submitted within
thirty days after publication of this
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 120 (Friday, June 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35166-35167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13977]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-63,193]
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Asset Management Fiduciary
Administration--Court Accounting, Troy, MI; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated June 6, 2008, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The denial notice was signed on May 13, 2008 and
published in the Federal Register on May 29, 2008 (73 FR 30978).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The negative TAA determination issued by the Department for workers
of JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Asset Management, Fiduciary
Administration--Court Accounting, Troy, Michigan was based on the
finding that the worker group does not produce an article within the
meaning of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The petitioner states that employment at the subject firm was
negatively impacted by a shift of job functions to India. The
petitioner also states that regardless of whether the workers of the
subject firm produce a product or provide services, they should be
certified eligible for Trade Adjustment Assistance.
The investigation revealed that the workers of JP Morgan Chase &
Co., JP Morgan Asset Management, Fiduciary Administration--Court
Accounting, Troy, Michigan are engaged in preparing trust and account
transaction histories, and asset inventory lists for various county
courts and/or other clients. These functions, as described above, are
[[Page 35167]]
not considered production of an article within the meaning of Section
222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The allegation of a shift to another country might be relevant if
it was determined that workers of the subject firm produced an article.
Since the investigation determined that workers of JP Morgan Chase &
Co., JP Morgan Asset Management, Fiduciary Administration--Court
Accounting, Troy, Michigan do not produce an article, there cannot be
imports nor a shift in production of an ``article'' abroad within the
meaning of the Trade Act of 1974 in this instance.
The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor
provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a
mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2)
a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration
of the initial determination.
After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the
Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of June 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-13977 Filed 6-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
