Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings From China, 34325-34326 [E8-13528]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 17, 2008 / Notices
Land Management and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service contractors working
under the supervision of the Alaska
Office of History and Archaeology
professional staff in consultation with
representatives of the Qawalangin Tribe
of Unalaska.
In 1950, human remains representing
a minimum of 10 individuals were
removed from the Eider Point site near
Unalaska on Unalaska Island in the Fox
Island group of the eastern Aleutian
Islands, AK. No known individuals
were identified. No associated funerary
objects are present.
During the 1950s or 1960s, human
remains representing a minimum of one
individual were removed from an
undetermined site near Unalaska on
Amaknak Island in the Fox Island group
of the eastern Aleutian Islands, AK. No
known individual was identified. No
associated funerary objects are present.
According to museum records, the
human remains from both sites were
excavated by Dr. Ted Bank of Western
Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI,
under federal permits. All excavations
were done on land managed by the
Bureau of Land Management authority
at the time. In about 1998, the Museum
of the Aleutians received the Western
Michigan University archeological
collections from Unalaska and Amaknak
Islands, AK, including human remains
that had been in the possession of the
now–deceased Dr. Bank. In about 2003,
human remains were moved to the
University of Alaska, Anchorage,
Anthropology Department. In 2004, the
human remains were sent to the State of
Alaska Office of History and
Archaeology for inventory.
Unalaska Island and nearby Amaknak
Island have been inhabited for over
8,000 years by Aleut (Unangan) people.
Based on geographical location, oral
history, and archeological evidence, the
human remains from these two islands
are determined to be Native American
and ancestors of the Qawalangin Tribe
of Unalaska.
Officials of the Bureau of Land
Management have determined that,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9–10), the
human remains described above
represent the physical remains of 11
individuals of Native American
ancestry. Officials of the Bureau of Land
Management also have determined that,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is
a relationship of shared group identity
that can be reasonably traced between
the Native American human remains
and the Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains
should contact Dr. Robert E. King,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Jun 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
Alaska State NAGPRA Coordinator,
Bureau of Land Management, 222 W.
7th Avenue, Box 13, Anchorage, AK
99513–7599, telephone (907) 271–5510,
before July 17, 2008. Repatriation of the
human remains to the Qawalangin Tribe
of Unalaska may proceed after that date
if no additional claimants come
forward.
The Bureau of Land Management is
responsible for notifying the Ounalaska
Corporation and Qawalangin Tribe of
Unalaska that this notice has been
published.
Dated: May 21, 2008
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. E8–13584 Filed 6–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–990 (Review)]
Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings
From China
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping
duty order on non-malleable cast iron
pipe fittings from China.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on non-malleable cast iron
pipe fittings from China would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of
this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: June 6, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34325
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On June 6, 2008, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (73
FR 11440, March 3, 2008) of the subject
five-year review was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2
Staff report. A staff report containing
information concerning the subject
matter of the review will be placed in
the nonpublic record on June 26, 2008,
and made available to persons on the
Administrative Protective Order service
list for this review. A public version
will be issued thereafter, pursuant to
section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions. As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,3 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before July 1,
2008, and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither
a party to the five-year review nor an
interested party may submit a brief
written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the review by July 1, 2008.
However, should the Department of
Commerce extend the time limit for its
completion of the final results of its
review, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Vice Chairman
Shara L. Aranoff determined that the changes in the
conditions of competition warranted conducting a
full review.
3 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Anvil International, LP, and Ward
Manufacturing, LLP, to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
34326
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 17, 2008 / Notices
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
2002). Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II (C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173
(November 8, 2002).
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
Issued: June 11, 2008.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–13528 Filed 6–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of Settlement
Agreement Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA)
Notice is hereby given that on June 2,
2008, a proposed Settlement Agreement
in the case of In re ASARCO LLC, et al.,
No. 05–21207, Chapter 11, regarding the
Iron Mountain Site located in Mineral
County, Montana, near the Town of
Superior, Montana, was lodged with the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas.
The United States, on behalf of the
Forest Service, and the Montana
Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) alleged that they incurred past
response costs, and will incur future
response costs, under CERCLA in
connection with the Site for which
ASARCO LLC is liable. The Settlement
Agreement for the Iron Mountain Site
would provide a $500,000 unsecured
claim for the Forest Service and a $1.7
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Jun 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
million unsecured claim for the State of
Montana. In addition, ASARCO LLC
would agree to negotiate an
Administrative Order on Consent with
the Montana DEQ for the investigation
and analysis of remedial options and to
implement the remedy for portions of
the Iron Mountain Site currently owned
by ASARCO LLC.
For thirty (30) days after the date of
this publication, the Department of
Justice will receive comments relating to
the Settlement Agreement. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and either
e-mailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611. In either
case, the comments should refer to In re
ASARCO LLC, et al., Iron Mountain Site,
D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–09141.
During the comment period, the
Settlement Agreement may be examined
on the following Department of Justice
Web site: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Settlement Agreement may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please enclose a check in the amount of
$4.75 (25 cents per page reproduction
cost) payable to the United States
Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward
a check in that amount to the Consent
Decree Library at the stated address.
Robert E. Maher, Jr.,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E8–13637 Filed 6–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Proposed Settlement
Agreement Under the Park System
Resource Protection Act
Notice is hereby given that the United
States Department of Justice, on behalf
of the U.S. Department of the Interior,
National Park Service (‘‘DOI’’) has
reached a settlement with Thomas G.
Mundy, on behalf of himself and the
M/V Sea Ya regarding claims for
response costs and damages under the
Park System Resource Protection Act
(‘‘PSRPA’’), 16 U.S.C. 19jj.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The United States’ claim arises from
the grounding of the vessel ‘‘Sea Ya’’ in
Everglades National Park on September
3, 2001. The grounding injured Park
resources. Pursuant to the Agreement,
the United States will recover $150,000.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Settlement Agreement.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to the
Settlement Agreement between the
United States and Thomas G. Mundy
and the M/V Sea Ya, DOJ Ref. No. 90–
5–1–1–08517.
The proposed Settlement Agreement
may be examined at Everglades National
Park, 40001 State Road 9336,
Homestead, FL 33034–6733, and at the
Department of the Interior, Office of the
Solicitor, Southeast Regional Office,
Richard B. Russell Federal Building, 75
Spring Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303. During the public comment
period, the Settlement Agreement may
also be examined on the following
Department of Justice Web site, https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Settlement Agreement may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please enclose a check in the amount of
$2.75 (25 cents per page reproduction
cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if
by email or fax, forward a check in that
amount to the Consent Decree Library at
the stated address.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E8–13635 Filed 6–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34325-34326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13528]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-990 (Review)]
Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings From China
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited five-year review concerning the
antidumping duty order on non-malleable cast iron pipe fittings from
China.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an
expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation
of the antidumping duty order on non-malleable cast iron pipe fittings
from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: June 6, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On June 6, 2008, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(73 FR 11440, March 3, 2008) of the subject five-year review was
adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that
would warrant conducting a full review.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to
section 751(c)(3) of the Act.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
\2\ Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Vice Chairman Shara L.
Aranoff determined that the changes in the conditions of competition
warranted conducting a full review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff report. A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on
June 26, 2008, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's
rules.
Written submissions. As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the review
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\3\ and any party other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are
due on or before July 1, 2008, and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review
nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review
by July 1, 2008. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, the
deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information)
on Commerce's final
[[Page 34326]]
results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce's
results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI),
they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and
207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or
electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002).
Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II (C) of
the Commission's Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168,
68173 (November 8, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by Anvil
International, LP, and Ward Manufacturing, LLP, to be individually
adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: June 11, 2008.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-13528 Filed 6-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P