Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 33991-33992 [E8-13494]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 116 / Monday, June 16, 2008 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
demonstrating that those members of
the board involved in the day-to-day
activities of the company, including the
President, the Business Administration
Division Director, and the Auditor, have
all remained the same;
(3) Saehan shareholder meeting
minutes regarding the name change;
(4) Saehan’s and Woongjin’s business
registration certificate which
demonstrates that despite the name
change, the business registration
number remained the same;
(5) Certificate of corporate registration
that demonstrated the name change
from Saehan to Woongjin;
(6) Announcement to Saehan’s
customers of the name change;
(7) Corporate organizational charts
demonstrating that the organizational
structure remained unchanged despite
the name change;
(8) Organizational charts of the PSF
production and sales divisions
demonstrating that the organizational
structure remained unchanged before
and after the name change;
(9) Woongjin’s Internet Web site
demonstrating that Saehan is now
Woongjin;
(10) A list of suppliers before and
after the name change demonstrating
that Woongjin has maintained Saehan’s
supplier relationships with only some
minor variations (which Woongjin
explains are due to timing changes and
normal business turnover); and
(11) A list of customers before and
after the name change demonstrating
that Woongjin has maintained Saehan’s
customer base with only some minor
variations (which Woongjin explains are
due to timing changes and normal
business turnover).
The documentation described above
demonstrates that there was little or no
change in management structure,
supplier relationships, production
facilities, or customer base. Therefore,
we determine that expedited action is
warranted and we preliminarily find
that Woongjin is the successor-ininterest to Saehan and, thus, should
receive the same antidumping duty
treatment with respect to PSF from
Korea. Because we have concluded that
expedited action is warranted, we are
combining these notices of initiation
and preliminary results.
Public Comment
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of
this notice. Any hearing, if requested,
will be held no later than 44 days after
the date of publication of this notice, or
the first workday thereafter. Persons
interested in attending the hearing, if
one is requested, should contact the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Jun 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
Department for the date and time of the
hearing.
Case briefs from interested parties
may be submitted not later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to the
issues raised in those comments, may be
filed not later than 37 days after the date
of publication of this notice. All written
comments shall be submitted in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303. The
Department will publish the final
results of this changed circumstances
review, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.216(e).
The current requirement for a cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
on all subject merchandise will
continue unless and until it is modified
pursuant to the final results of this
changed circumstances review.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) and (2)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216.
Dated: June 6, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–13506 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–822
Helical Spring Lock Washers from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 16, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Devta Ohri, AD/CVD Operations, Office
1, Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–3853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On October 19, 1993, the Department
published the antidumping duty order
on certain helical spring lock washers
(‘‘HSLW’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’), as amended on
November 23, 1993. See Antidumping
Duty Order: Certain Helical Spring Lock
Washers From the People’s Republic of
China, 58 FR 53914 (October 19, 1993),
and Amended Final Determination and
Amended Antidumping Duty Order:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33991
Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers
From the People’s Republic of China, 58
FR 61859 (November 23, 1993). On
November 26, 2007, the Department
initiated an administrative review of
Hangzhou Spring Washer Co., Ltd. (also
known as Zhejiang Wanxin Group, Ltd.)
(‘‘HSW’’ or ‘‘Respondent’’). See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 72 FR 65938 (November 26, 2007).
On May 15, 2008, both HSW and
Shakeproof Assembly Components
Division of Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(‘‘Shakeproof’’ or ‘‘Petitioner’’)
requested that the Department exercise
its discretion and extend the deadline
for withdrawal of administrative review
beyond 90 days, thereby allowing both
HSW’s and Shakeproof’s May 15, 2008,
withdrawal requests to be considered
timely.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
HSLWs of carbon steel, of carbon alloy
steel, or of stainless steel, heat–treated
or non–heat-treated, plated or non–
plated, with ends that are off–line.
HSLWs are designed to: (1) Function as
a spring to compensate for developed
looseness between the component parts
of a fastened assembly; (2) distribute the
load over a larger area for screws or
bolts; and (3) provide a hardened
bearing surface. The scope does not
include internal or external tooth
washers, nor does it include spring lock
washers made of other metals, such as
copper.
HSLWs subject to the order are
currently classifiable under subheading
7318.21.0030 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of this
proceeding is dispositive.
Rescission of Review
Section 351.213(d)(1) of the
Department’s regulations provides that
the Department will rescind an
administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request for review within 90 days of the
date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review, or
withdraws its request at a later date if
the Department determines that it is
reasonable to extend the time limit for
withdrawing the request. Both HSW and
Shakeproof withdrew their requests for
review on May 15, 2008, which is after
the 90-day deadline. Nonetheless, the
Department accepts the withdrawal
requests because it has not yet expended
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
33992
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 116 / Monday, June 16, 2008 / Notices
significant resources on this review.
Therefore, the Department is rescinding
the administrative review of HSW
covering the period October 1, 2006
through September 30, 2007.
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 15 days
after publication of this rescission
notice. The Department will instruct
CBP to assess antidumping duties at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i).
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 777(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: June 10, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–13494 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
COMMITTEE FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE
AGREEMENTS
Entry of Shipments of Cotton, Wool,
Man-Made Fiber, Silk Blend and Other
Vegetable Fiber Textiles and Apparel in
Excess of U.S. - China Bilateral Textile
Agreement Limits for 2008.
June 11, 2008.
The Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements
(the Committee).
ACTION: Notice.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Ross
Arnold, International Trade Specialist,
Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S.
Department of Commerce, (202) 4824212.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:44 Jun 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Authority: Executive Order 11651 of March
3, 1972, as amended; Section 204 of the
Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended (7
U.S.C. 1854).
This notice serves to remind
interested parties that charges against
the limits subject to the U.S. - China
Bilateral Textile Agreement signed on
November 8, 2005 (the Agreement) are
by date of export and not date of entry.
A properly completed electronic visa
(ELVIS) transmission will be required
for all shipments exported prior to
January 1, 2009 that are subject to
Agreement limits, regardless of the date
of entry into the United States.
Shipments exported in 2008 in excess of
agreed limits are in violation of the
terms of the Agreement. Shipments
exported from China on and after
January 1, 2009 will not require an
ELVIS transmission.
The purpose of this notice is to advise
the public that CITA reserves the right
to permanently deny entry to or to stage
entry to goods that have been shipped
in excess of the 2008 limits under the
Agreement. Overshipments of
merchandise subject to the Agreement
shall be subject to delayed and staged
entry, in a manner similar to the
procedures followed for overshipments
of 2005 China textile safeguard limits, as
published in the Federal Register Notice
on December 5, 2005 (70 FR 72427).
Any overshipments of the 2008 limits of
the Agreement shall be subject to the
following procedures:
1. Entry will not be allowed until
one month after the expiration date
of the agreement limit. Therefore
entry will not be allowed until
February 1, 2009.
2. At that time, only 5 percent of the
2008 base limit will be allowed
entry for a one month period
beginning on that date.
3. An additional 5 percent will be
allowed entry monthly until all
overshipments are allowed entry.
CITA will publish a notice and
directive to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) later this year
indicating the categories involved in
staged entry and the 5 percent quantities
to be allowed in monthly beginning
February 1, 2009.
R. Matthew Priest,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation
of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. E8–13482 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
Feasibility of a Reciprocal Defense
Procurement Memorandum of
Understanding With Poland
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Request for industry feedback
regarding experience in public
(particularly defense) procurements
conducted by the Republic of Poland.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DoD is soliciting information
from U.S. industry that has had
experience participating in public
defense procurements conducted by or
on behalf of Poland’s Ministry of
National Defense or Armed Forces. DoD
is considering the possibility of
negotiating a Reciprocal Defense
Procurement Memorandum of
Understanding (RDP MOU) with
Poland. The contemplated MOU would
involve reciprocal waivers of buynational laws by each country. This
would mean that Poland would be
added to the list of ‘‘qualifying
countries’’ in the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS), and that offers of products of
Poland would be exempt from the U.S.
Buy American Act and Balance of
Payments Program policy that would
otherwise require DoD to add 50 percent
to the price of the foreign products
when evaluating offers. This also means
that U.S. products should be exempt
from any analogous ‘‘Buy Polish’’ law or
policy applicable to Poland’s defense
procurements. DoD is interested in
industry comments relating to the
transparency, integrity, and general
fairness of Poland’s public (defense)
procurement processes. DoD is also
interested in comments relating to the
degree of reciprocity that exists between
the United States and Poland when it
comes to the openness of defense
procurements to offers of products of
the other country.
DATES: Comments, which will be treated
in a confidential manner, must be
received by July 16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to: Office of the Director, Defense
Procurement, Acquisition Policy, and
Strategic Sourcing, ATTN: OUSD
(AT&L) DPAP (CPIC), 3060 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3060;
or by e-mail to
barbara.glotfelty@osd.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Barbara Glotfelty, telephone 703–697–
9351.
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 116 (Monday, June 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33991-33992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13494]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-570-822
Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People's Republic of China:
Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 16, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Devta Ohri, AD/CVD Operations, Office
1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 19, 1993, the Department published the antidumping duty
order on certain helical spring lock washers (``HSLW'') from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC''), as amended on November 23, 1993.
See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers From
the People's Republic of China, 58 FR 53914 (October 19, 1993), and
Amended Final Determination and Amended Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
Helical Spring Lock Washers From the People's Republic of China, 58 FR
61859 (November 23, 1993). On November 26, 2007, the Department
initiated an administrative review of Hangzhou Spring Washer Co., Ltd.
(also known as Zhejiang Wanxin Group, Ltd.) (``HSW'' or
``Respondent''). See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 72 FR 65938
(November 26, 2007). On May 15, 2008, both HSW and Shakeproof Assembly
Components Division of Illinois Tool Works Inc. (``Shakeproof'' or
``Petitioner'') requested that the Department exercise its discretion
and extend the deadline for withdrawal of administrative review beyond
90 days, thereby allowing both HSW's and Shakeproof's May 15, 2008,
withdrawal requests to be considered timely.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are HSLWs of carbon steel, of
carbon alloy steel, or of stainless steel, heat-treated or non-heat-
treated, plated or non-plated, with ends that are off-line. HSLWs are
designed to: (1) Function as a spring to compensate for developed
looseness between the component parts of a fastened assembly; (2)
distribute the load over a larger area for screws or bolts; and (3)
provide a hardened bearing surface. The scope does not include internal
or external tooth washers, nor does it include spring lock washers made
of other metals, such as copper.
HSLWs subject to the order are currently classifiable under
subheading 7318.21.0030 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope
of this proceeding is dispositive.
Rescission of Review
Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department's regulations provides that
the Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its request for review within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested
review, or withdraws its request at a later date if the Department
determines that it is reasonable to extend the time limit for
withdrawing the request. Both HSW and Shakeproof withdrew their
requests for review on May 15, 2008, which is after the 90-day
deadline. Nonetheless, the Department accepts the withdrawal requests
because it has not yet expended
[[Page 33992]]
significant resources on this review. Therefore, the Department is
rescinding the administrative review of HSW covering the period October
1, 2006 through September 30, 2007.
The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') 15 days after publication of
this rescission notice. The Department will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: June 10, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-13494 Filed 6-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S