In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices, DMA Systems, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement, 33114-33115 [E8-13047]

Download as PDF 33114 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 11, 2008 / Notices the NPS and USPP to remain in their current facilities. Pursuant to the D.C. Lands Act, the redevelopment of Poplar Point will include approximately 70 acres of parkland in perpetuity that may include wetlands, landscaped areas, pedestrian walkways, bicycle trails, seating, opensided shelters, natural areas, recreational use areas and memorial sites. For the remaining acreage of the Site, the District is considering proposals for a cultural institution or museum, transit, a sports complex or stadium, and residential and commercial uses. Dated: May 19, 2008. Lisa A. Mendelson-Ielmini, Deputy Regional Director, National Capital Region. [FR Doc. E8–12837 Filed 6–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–JK–M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Plan of Operations for Reclamation of the Rafferty Fee Lease—Well No. 1 Site, Big Thicket National Preserve, Texas National Park Service, Department of the Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Plan of Operations for reclamation of the Rafferty Fee Lease—Well No. 1 site at Big Thicket National Preserve. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Section 9.52(b) of Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 9, Subpart B, of a Plan of Operations submitted by Buford Curtis, Inc., for reclamation of the Rafferty Fee Lease—Well No. 1 site, Hardin County, Texas. DATES: The above document is available for pubic review and comment through July 11, 2008. ADDRESSES: The Plan of Operations is available for public review and comment online at https:// parkplanning.nps.gov/bith, and in the office of the Superintendent, Todd Brindle, Big Thicket National Preserve, 6044 FM 420, Kountze, Texas 77625, telephone: 409–951–6802. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Haigler ‘‘Dusty’’ Pate, Biologist, Oil and Gas Program Manager, Big Thicket National Preserve, 6044 FM 420, Kountze, Texas 77625, telephone: 409– 951–6822, e-mail at Haigler_Pate@nps.gov. If you wish to comment, you may submit your SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:13 Jun 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 comments by any one of several methods. You may mail comments to the Superintendent at the address above. You may also comment via the Internet at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/ bith. If you do not receive a confirmation from the system that we have received your Internet message, contact us directly using the information above. Finally, you may hand-deliver comments to the address above. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment including your personal identifying information may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: May 2, 2008 Todd W. Brindle, Superintendent, Big Thicket National Preserve. [FR Doc. E8–12964 Filed 6–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–CB–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–607] In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices, DMA Systems, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 73) granting the joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Frahm, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3107. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– TA–607 based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Seoul, Korea (‘‘Samsung’’) on May 7, 2007. 72 FR 32863 (June 14, 2007). The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor devices, DMA systems, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,613,162 and U.S. Patent No. 7,064,026. The notice of investigation named Renesas Technology Corp. of Tokyo, Japan and Renesas Technology America, Inc. of San Jose, California (collectively, ‘‘Renesas’’) as respondents. The complaint, as amended, further alleged that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection 337(a)(2). On April 25, 2008, Samsung and Renesas jointly moved to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. On April 29, 2008, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response supporting the motion. On May 19, 2008, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 73) granting the joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. The ALJ found that the joint motion complied with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(b) (19 CFR 210.21(b)). In addition, the ALJ concluded, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)), that there is no evidence that termination of this investigation will prejudice the public interest. No petitions for review of this ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 11, 2008 / Notices By order of the Commission. Issued: June 5, 2008, Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–13047 Filed 6–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–456 and 731– TA–1151–1152 (Preliminary)] Background Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada And China; Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)) (the Act), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured 2 by reason of imports from Canada and China of citric acid and certain citrate salts, provided for in subheading 2918.14.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) and subsidized by the Government of China. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Commencement of Final Phase Investigations Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission’s rules, the Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of its investigations. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of scheduling, which will be published in the Federal Register as provided in section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules, upon notice from the Department of Commerce (Commerce) of affirmative preliminary determinations in the investigations under sections 703(b) or 733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary determinations are negative, upon notice of affirmative final determinations in those investigations under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the Act. Parties that filed entries of appearance in the preliminary phase of the investigations need not enter a separate appearance for the final phase 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane and Dean A. Pinkert determined that there is no reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of imports from Canada and China of citric acid and certain citrate salts. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:13 Jun 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 of the investigations. Industrial users, and, if the merchandise under investigation is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations have the right to appear as parties in Commission antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The Secretary will prepare a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the investigations. On April 14, 2008, a petition was filed with the Commission and Commerce by Archer Daniels Midland Co., Decatur, IL; Cargill, Inc., Wayzata, MN; and Tate & Lyle Americas, Inc., Decatur, IL, alleging that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of imports of citric acid and certain citrate salts from Canada and China that are alleged to be sold in the United States at LTFV and subsidized by the Government of China. Accordingly, effective April 14, 2008, the Commission instituted antidumping and countervailing duty investigations Nos. 701–TA–456 and 731–TA–1151– 1152 (Preliminary). Notice of the institution of the Commission’s investigations and of a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of April 22, 2008 (73 FR 21650). The conference was held in Washington, DC, on May 7, 2008, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on May 29, 2008. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4008 (June 2008), entitled Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada and China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–456 and 731–TA–1151–1152 (Preliminary). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 5, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–13050 Filed 6–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 33115 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1135 (Final)] Sodium Metal From France United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of the final phase of an antidumping investigation. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping investigation No. 731–TA–1135 (Final) under section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act) to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of less-than-fair-value imports from France of sodium metal, provided for in subheading 2805.11.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.1 For further information concerning the conduct of this phase of the investigation, hearing procedures, and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: May 28, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathanael Comly (202–205–3174), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—The final phase of this investigation is being scheduled as a result of an affirmative preliminary determination by the Department of Commerce that imports of sodium metal from France are being sold in the United States at less than fair value within the 1 For purposes of this investigation, the Department of Commerce has defined the subject merchandise as ‘‘sodium metal (Na), in any form and at any purity level.’’ Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33114-33115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13047]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-607]


In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices, DMA Systems, and 
Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review 
an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of 
a Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 73) 
granting the joint motion to terminate the above-captioned 
investigation based on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Frahm, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3107. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
607 based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of 
Seoul, Korea (``Samsung'') on May 7, 2007. 72 FR 32863 (June 14, 2007). 
The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain semiconductor devices, DMA systems, and 
products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of 
U.S. Patent No. 5,613,162 and U.S. Patent No. 7,064,026. The notice of 
investigation named Renesas Technology Corp. of Tokyo, Japan and 
Renesas Technology America, Inc. of San Jose, California (collectively, 
``Renesas'') as respondents. The complaint, as amended, further alleged 
that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection 
337(a)(2).
    On April 25, 2008, Samsung and Renesas jointly moved to terminate 
the investigation based on a settlement agreement. On April 29, 2008, 
the Commission investigative attorney filed a response supporting the 
motion.
    On May 19, 2008, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 73) 
granting the joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a 
settlement agreement. The ALJ found that the joint motion complied with 
the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(b) (19 CFR 210.21(b)). In 
addition, the ALJ concluded, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) 
(19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)), that there is no evidence that termination of 
this investigation will prejudice the public interest. No petitions for 
review of this ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).


[[Page 33115]]


By order of the Commission.
    Issued: June 5, 2008,
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E8-13047 Filed 6-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.