Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 32738-32739 [E8-12968]
Download as PDF
32738
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than June 20, 2008.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than June 20,
2008.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room C–5311, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of
May 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
Appendix
TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 5/19/08 AND 5/23/08
TA–W
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
63401
63402
63403
63404
63405
63406
63407
63408
63409
63410
63411
63412
63413
63414
63415
63416
63417
63418
63419
63420
63421
63422
63423
63424
63425
63426
63427
63428
63429
63430
63431
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Date of institution
Subject Firm (petitioners)
Location
Unifi, Inc. (Comp) .................................................................
NTN–BCA Corporation (USW) .............................................
Lear Corporation (UAW) .......................................................
FMC (Spring Hill Facility) (Wkrs) ..........................................
Esselte Corporation (Comp) .................................................
Cocomo Apparel (State) .......................................................
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. (Comp) ...............................
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. (Comp) ................................
Twigg Corporation (Wkrs) ....................................................
Comau, Inc. (Wkrs) ..............................................................
Pass & Seymour/Legrand (Comp) .......................................
Pfizer, Inc. (Wrks) .................................................................
Dana Corp Holding Co. (Comp) ...........................................
Uster Technologies, Inc. (Comp) .........................................
Acklin Stamping Co. (Comp) ................................................
Novelis Aluminum (USWA) ..................................................
Greene Plastics Corporation (Comp) ...................................
Gramercy Jewelry Mfg. Corp. (Wkrs) ...................................
Ansonia Copper and Brass (Comp) .....................................
Bernhardt Furniture Company (Comp) .................................
Kimble Chase LLC (Wkrs) ....................................................
Springs Direct Division (Wkrs) .............................................
American Axle and Manufacturing (Wkrs) ...........................
Ferguson Aluminum (Comp) ................................................
Steris Corporation (Comp) ...................................................
Pacific Continental Apparel, Inc. (State) ..............................
Lumberg Automation (Comp) ...............................................
Markay Designs, Inc. (Comp) ...............................................
Borgwarner Transmission Systems (Comp) ........................
Comau Inc. East (Union) ......................................................
Greenville Tool & Die Company (Comp) .............................
Staunton, VA .........................
Lititz, PA ................................
Tampa, FL .............................
South Charleston, WV ..........
Buena Park, CA ....................
Vernon, CA ...........................
Bucks, AL ..............................
Blytheville, AR .......................
Martinsville, IN ......................
Warren, MI ............................
Concord, NC .........................
Conshohocken, PA ...............
Marion, IN .............................
Knoxville, TN .........................
Toledo, OH ............................
Louisville, KY ........................
Hope Valley, RI .....................
New York, NY .......................
Ansonia, CT ..........................
Shelby, NC ............................
Vineland, NJ ..........................
Lancaster, SC .......................
Tonawanda, NY ....................
Olmsted, IL ............................
Erie, PA .................................
Rancho Dominguez, CA .......
Midlothian, VA .......................
Sophia, NC ............................
Frankfort, IL ...........................
Macomb Twp., MI .................
Greenville, MI ........................
15:35 Jun 09, 2008
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/21/08
05/21/08
05/21/08
05/21/08
05/21/08
05/21/08
05/21/08
05/22/08
05/22/08
05/22/08
05/22/08
05/22/08
05/23/08
05/23/08
05/23/08
05/23/08
Date of petition
05/19/08
05/18/08
05/16/08
05/16/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/14/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/12/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
04/23/08
05/20/08
05/20/08
05/12/08
05/19/08
05/21/08
05/16/08
05/21/08
05/21/08
05/13/08
05/22/08
05/21/08
05/22/08
05/22/08
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Notices
[FR Doc. E8–12968 Filed 6–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,808]
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Invista, S.A.R.L., Nylon Apparel
Filament Fibers Group, a Subsidiary of
Koch Industries, Inc., Chattanooga,
TN; Notice of Negative Determination
on Remand
On March 27, 2008, the U.S. Court of
International Trade (USCIT) granted the
Department of Labor’s motion for a
second voluntary remand in Former
Employees of Invista, S.A.R.L. v. U.S.
Secretary of Labor, Court No. 07–00160.
On December 15, 2006, an official of
Invista, S.A.R.L., Nylon Apparel
Filament Fibers Group, A Subsidiary of
Koch Industries, Inc., Chattanooga,
Tennessee (the subject firm) filed a
petition for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) on
behalf of workers and former workers at
the subject firm engaged in activity
related to the production of nylon fiber.
AR 1. The company official stated that
the ‘‘petition is a continuation of the
shift of production to Mexico as
described in TA–W–55,055 that expired
August 20, 2006. After the shift in
production to another country * * * .
all orders continued to be processed
from the United States until now. The
Customer Service Representatives
(CSRs) losing their jobs are being
replaced by CSRs located in South
America who will handle orders for
companies located in the United
States.’’ AR 2.
The TAA/ATAA certification
applicable TA–W–55,055 (issued
August 20, 2004) was based on the
Department’s findings that the subject
firm shifted production of three types of
nylon filament to Mexico. AR 5–6.
The Department of Labor
(Department) issued a negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for TAA/ATAA on
February 7, 2007. The determination
was based on the Department’s findings
that, during the relevant period, the
subject workers did not produce an
article or support an appropriate
subdivision that produced an article
domestically, and, as such, cannot be
adversely impacted or affected by a shift
in production. AR 30–32. The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 09, 2008
Jkt 211001
on February 21, 2007 (72 FR 7909). AR
43.
In the request for administrative
reconsideration, dated February 18,
2007, a worker at the subject firm stated
that after TA–W–55,055 was filed, the
subject firm ceased to produce apparel
textile and began producing
Performance Materials. The worker also
stated that ‘‘after the petition (TA–W–
55,055) expired, (the subject firm) let go
the last of the apparel fibers personnel.
Since I sold 100% apparel fiber, there
was no reason to keep me.’’ AR 35. The
worker further stated that ‘‘I was
downsized, yet there were people in
Brazil hired to do my work.’’ AR 36.
In a subsequent letter, the worker who
filed the request for reconsideration
stated that ‘‘I was informed by
management on 11/14/06, that my job
was being split up; part of it going to
Brazil and part going to Wilmington,
Delaware.’’ AR 37. The worker also
stated that ‘‘All the apparel people were
let go. This is a direct result of the
textile industry going to developing
countries and the loss of textile
manufacturing in the U.S.’’ AR 38.
In a letter dated March 15, 2007, the
Department stated that the request for
reconsideration was being dismissed
because insufficient evidence was
furnished to warrant reconsideration
pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) and
reiterated that, because the subject
workers did not produce an article or
support domestic production of an
article during the one year period prior
to the petition, the subject workers are
not eligible to apply for worker
adjustment assistance under the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended. AR 45. The
Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration was issued on March
21, 2007. AR 47. The Department’s
Notice of dismissal was published in the
Federal Register on March 30, 2007 (72
FR 15169). AR 48.
By application dated May 11, 2007,
Plaintiffs sought review by the USCIT.
The complaint stated that the
certification of TA-W–55,055 was based
on a shift of textile machines to Mexico
and that the negative determination of
TA–W–60,808 was ‘‘due to the
machines having been shipped to
Mexico more than a year earlier. Yet my
job did not officially terminate till the
reorganization to rid the Chattanooga
plant of ALL textile employees.’’
Under the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, certification of group
eligibility to apply for TAA will be
issued provided that (1) a significant
number or proportion of the workers of
such workers’ firm, or an appropriate
subdivision, have been totally or
partially separated or are threatened to
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32739
become totally or partially separated;
and (2) there has been a shift in
production from the workers’ firm or
subdivision to an eligible foreign
country of articles like or directly
competitive with those produced by the
subject firm or subdivision under
section 222(a)(2)(B)(i); and, either the
foreign country is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States under
section 222(a)(2)(B)(ii)(I), is a
beneficiary country under section
222(a)(2)(B)(ii)(II), or there has been or
is likely to be an increase in imports of
like or directly competitive articles. The
Department interprets this standard for
certification as requiring that the shift of
production of an article to a foreign
country must be a cause of the
separations of workers of the firm that
were engaged in or supported the
production of that article.
After the shift of nylon filament
production to Mexico in 2004, the
subject firm continued to employ the
subject workers to market nylon apparel
filament produced in Mexico and to
process orders of nylon apparel filament
produced in Mexico. AR 2, 26–27, 29,
35–38, SAR 8.
Information provided by the subject
firm during the remand investigation
revealed that the workers’ separations
are not related to the shift of production
of apparel nylon filament to Mexico in
2004. During the relevant period,
customer service functions were
performed at Invista facilities in Canada,
South America, Chattanooga,
Tennessee, and Wilmington Delaware.
The customer service functions were
consolidated to Paulinia, Brazil, and
Wilmington, Delaware due to a business
decision to improve the efficiency of the
customer service organization. At the
time of plaintiff separations the subject
firm terminated other workers whose
functions were unrelated to the
production of apparel nylon filaments.
SAR 11, 18. The separated workers were
‘‘two (2) Apparel Nylon Customer
Service Representatives located at
Chattanooga, one (1) Performance
Materials Customer Service
Representative located at Chattanooga,
and one (1) Performance Materials
Product Coordinator located at
Chattanooga.’’ SAR 8. The fact that two
of the four separated workers worked on
a product line (Performance Materials)
whose production was not shifted to
Mexico confirms the company’s
statements that the layoffs were part of
a business decision to increase
efficiency in the customer service
operation. This bolsters the conclusion
that the plaintiff separations were not
caused by the shift of production of
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32738-32739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12968]
[[Page 32738]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply
for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section
221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the
Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director
of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training
Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section
221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title
II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as
appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial
separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the
firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest
in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public
hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director,
Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than June 20, 2008.
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding
the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than
June 20, 2008.
The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at
the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance,
Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
C-5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
Appendix
TAA Petitions Instituted Between 5/19/08 and 5/23/08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Date of
TA-W Subject Firm (petitioners) Location institution petition
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63401...................... Unifi, Inc. (Comp)......... Staunton, VA.......... 05/19/08 05/19/08
63402...................... NTN-BCA Corporation (USW).. Lititz, PA............ 05/19/08 05/18/08
63403...................... Lear Corporation (UAW)..... Tampa, FL............. 05/19/08 05/16/08
63404...................... FMC (Spring Hill Facility) South Charleston, WV.. 05/19/08 05/16/08
(Wkrs).
63405...................... Esselte Corporation (Comp). Buena Park, CA........ 05/20/08 05/19/08
63406...................... Cocomo Apparel (State)..... Vernon, CA............ 05/20/08 05/19/08
63407...................... Syngenta Crop Protection, Bucks, AL............. 05/20/08 05/19/08
Inc. (Comp).
63408...................... Milwaukee Electric Tool Blytheville, AR....... 05/20/08 05/19/08
Corp. (Comp).
63409...................... Twigg Corporation (Wkrs)... Martinsville, IN...... 05/20/08 05/14/08
63410...................... Comau, Inc. (Wkrs)......... Warren, MI............ 05/20/08 05/19/08
63411...................... Pass & Seymour/Legrand Concord, NC........... 05/20/08 05/19/08
(Comp).
63412...................... Pfizer, Inc. (Wrks)........ Conshohocken, PA...... 05/20/08 05/19/08
63413...................... Dana Corp Holding Co. Marion, IN............ 05/20/08 05/12/08
(Comp).
63414...................... Uster Technologies, Inc. Knoxville, TN......... 05/20/08 05/19/08
(Comp).
63415...................... Acklin Stamping Co. (Comp). Toledo, OH............ 05/20/08 05/19/08
63416...................... Novelis Aluminum (USWA).... Louisville, KY........ 05/21/08 05/20/08
63417...................... Greene Plastics Corporation Hope Valley, RI....... 05/21/08 05/20/08
(Comp).
63418...................... Gramercy Jewelry Mfg. Corp. New York, NY.......... 05/21/08 04/23/08
(Wkrs).
63419...................... Ansonia Copper and Brass Ansonia, CT........... 05/21/08 05/20/08
(Comp).
63420...................... Bernhardt Furniture Company Shelby, NC............ 05/21/08 05/20/08
(Comp).
63421...................... Kimble Chase LLC (Wkrs).... Vineland, NJ.......... 05/21/08 05/12/08
63422...................... Springs Direct Division Lancaster, SC......... 05/21/08 05/19/08
(Wkrs).
63423...................... American Axle and Tonawanda, NY......... 05/22/08 05/21/08
Manufacturing (Wkrs).
63424...................... Ferguson Aluminum (Comp)... Olmsted, IL........... 05/22/08 05/16/08
63425...................... Steris Corporation (Comp).. Erie, PA.............. 05/22/08 05/21/08
63426...................... Pacific Continental Rancho Dominguez, CA.. 05/22/08 05/21/08
Apparel, Inc. (State).
63427...................... Lumberg Automation (Comp).. Midlothian, VA........ 05/22/08 05/13/08
63428...................... Markay Designs, Inc. (Comp) Sophia, NC............ 05/23/08 05/22/08
63429...................... Borgwarner Transmission Frankfort, IL......... 05/23/08 05/21/08
Systems (Comp).
63430...................... Comau Inc. East (Union).... Macomb Twp., MI....... 05/23/08 05/22/08
63431...................... Greenville Tool & Die Greenville, MI........ 05/23/08 05/22/08
Company (Comp).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 32739]]
[FR Doc. E8-12968 Filed 6-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P