Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Upper Potomac River, Washington Channel, Washington Harbor, DC, 31782-31785 [E8-12475]
Download as PDF
31782
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
We prepared a draft economic
evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the
AD docket to examine the draft
economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend part
39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by
adding a new airworthiness directive to
read as follows:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation: Docket No.
FAA–2008–0609; Directorate Identifier
2008–SW–24–AD.
Applicability: Model S–76A, S–76B, and
S–76C helicopters with any of the following
part-numbered vertical stabilizer aft spars
assemblies having 1,000 or more hours timein-service (TIS) installed, certificated in any
category.
Helicopter model
S–76A ...........................
S–76B and S–76C ........
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Vertical stabilizer
aft spar assembly
part No.
76201–05002–114
76201–05002–115
76201–05002–047
16:40 Jun 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
Helicopter model
Vertical stabilizer
aft spar assembly
part No.
76201–05002–048
76201–25002–041
76201–25002–044
76201–25002–045
76201–25002–046
Compliance: Required as indicated.
To detect and correct an unbalanced or
out-of-track tail rotor, which could lead to
increased vibrations a fatigue crack, loss of a
portion of the vertical stabilizer, and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter,
accomplish the following:
(a) Within 30 days, unless accomplished
previously, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 50 hours TIS, inspect the vertical
stabilizer aft spar assembly (aft spar
assembly) for a crack, a loose or working
fastener, or corrosion in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
3.A., in Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
No. 76–55–20A, Revision A, dated November
11, 2003 (No. 76–55–20A). For purposes of
this AD, ASB No 76–55–20A pertains to
Model S–76B helicopters as well as Model S–
76A and S–76C helicopters.
(1) If a crack, a loose or working fastener,
or corrosion is found in the aft spar assembly,
before further flight:
(i) Repair or replace any unairworthy parts
and
(ii) Inspect the vertical stabilizer forward
spar assembly (forward spar assembly) for a
crack, a loose or working fastener, or
corrosion in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
3.B., in ASB No. 76–55–20A. Contacting the
manufacturer is not required by this AD.
(2) If a crack, a loose or working fastener,
or corrosion is found in the forward spar
assembly, repair in accordance with the
applicable maintenance manual or replace
with airworthy parts before further flight.
(b) Within 30 days, unless accomplished
previously, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 200 hours TIS, track-and-balance the
tail rotor in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
3.A., in ASB No. 76–65–58A, dated
November 11, 2003.
Note 1: Although the ASB specifies only an
initial inspection of the aft spar assembly and
a track-and-balance of the tail rotor, this AD
requires inspecting the aft spar assembly and
track-and-balancing the tail rotor repetitively.
Note 2: The track-and-balancing of the tail
rotor that is required by paragraph (b) of this
AD involves both a pilot and mechanic. The
pilot’s function is to operate the helicopter to
a ‘‘light on wheels’’ state—almost to the point
of takeoff. The mechanic is needed to
accomplish the vibration measurements.
(c) On or before December 31, 2010, install
a vertical stabilizer modification kit, part
number 76070–20562, 76070–20563, or
76070–20564. Installing the vertical stabilizer
modification kit is terminating action for the
requirements of this AD.
(d) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39.19. Contact the Manager, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, ATTN: Richard Noll, Aviation
Safety Engineer, FAA, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803,
telephone (781) 238–7160, fax (781) 238–
7170, for information about previously
approved alternative methods of compliance.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 22,
2008.
David A. Downey,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–12414 Filed 6–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0391]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Upper
Potomac River, Washington Channel,
Washington Harbor, DC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone upon
specified waters of the Upper Potomac
River. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during a fireworks
display launched from a barge located
within Washington Channel, in
Washington Harbor, DC. This action
will restrict vessel traffic in a portion of
the Washington Channel.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
July 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2008–0391 to the Docket
Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ground floor of the DOT West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays; or the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road,
Baltimore, Maryland 21226–1791,
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore, at (410) 576–
2674 or (410) 576–2693. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation’s Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–0391),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that we can contact you if we have
questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and
material by electronic means, mail, fax,
or delivery to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES;
but please submit your comments and
material by only one means. If you
submit them by mail or delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger
than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change this proposed rule in view of
them.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to use the Docket Management Facility.
Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’
paragraph below.
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Enter the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–0391) in the
Search box, and click ‘‘Go >>.’’ You may
also visit either the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Jun 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
Public Meeting
Background and Purpose
Fireworks displays are frequently
held from locations on or near the
navigable waters of the United States.
The accidental discharge of fireworks
and falling hot embers or other debris
are a safety concern during such events.
The Coast Guard has the authority to
impose appropriate controls on marine
events that may pose a threat to persons,
vessels and facilities under its
jurisdiction. The purpose of this rule is
to promote maritime safety, and to
protect mariners transiting the area from
the potential hazards associated with a
fireworks display. The rule is needed to
control movement in a portion of the
waterway that is expected to be
populated by spectators seeking to view
the fireworks display and mariners
operating unknowingly too close to the
fireworks discharge site.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
In support of its 2008 Centennial
Boule, marking the 100th anniversary of
its founding, the Alpha Kappa Alpha
Sorority, Inc. will sponsor a fireworks
display in Washington Harbor, DC. The
planned fireworks event includes a
fifteen-minute aerial display launched
from a barge in the Washington Channel
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31783
at 9:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 16,
2008.
To provide for the safety of spectators
and transiting vessels, the Captain of the
Port Baltimore, Maryland is proposing
to establish a safety zone that will be
enforced during the fireworks display
held on specified waters of the Upper
Potomac River. The proposed rule
establishes a safety zone on the waters
of the Washington Channel, within a
150-yard radius of the fireworks barge in
approximate position latitude 38°52′09″
N, longitude 077°01′13″ W, located
within the Washington Channel in
Washington Harbor, DC. The rule will
impact the movement of all persons and
vessels operating in specified waters of
the Washington Channel, from 8 p.m.
through 10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2008,
and if necessary due to inclement
weather, from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m.
on July 17, 2008.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary. There is little commercial
vessel traffic during the enforcement
period.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to
operate, remain or anchor within certain
waters of the Washington Channel, in
Washington Harbor, DC, from 8 p.m.
through 10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2008,
and if necessary due to inclement
weather, from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m.
on July 17, 2008. Because the zone is of
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
31784
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
limited duration, it is expected that
there will be minimal disruption to the
maritime community. Before the
effective period, the Coast Guard will
issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the waterway to
allow mariners to make alternative
plans for transiting the affected area. In
addition, smaller vessels not
constrained by their draft, which are
more likely to be small entities, may
transit around the safety zone.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Mr. Ronald
Houck, at Coast Guard Sector Baltimore,
Waterways Management Division, at
telephone number (410) 576–2674 or
(410) 576–2693. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Jun 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is not likely to have a
significant effect on the human
environment. The rule establishes a
temporary safety zone. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–0391 to
read as follows:
§ 165.T05–0391 Safety zone; Fireworks
Display, Upper Potomac River, Washington
Channel, Washington Harbor, DC.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section, Captain of the Port,
Baltimore, Maryland means the
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore or any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland to act
on his or her behalf.
(b) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Upper
Potomac River, surface to bottom,
within a 150-yard radius of the
fireworks barge in approximate position
latitude 38°52′09″ N, longitude
077°01′13″ W, located within the
Washington Channel in Washington
Harbor, DC. All coordinates reference
North American Datum 1983.
(c) Regulations:
(1) The general regulations governing
safety zones, found in Sec. 165.23,
apply to the safety zone described in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
zone is prohibited, unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the moving
safety zone must first request
authorization from the Captain of the
Port, Baltimore, Maryland to seek
permission to transit the area. The
Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland
can be contacted at telephone number
(410) 576–2693. The Coast Guard
vessels enforcing this section can be
contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF
Channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon being
hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the person or vessel shall
proceed as directed. If permission is
granted, all persons or vessels must
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland, and proceed at the minimum
speed necessary to maintain a safe
course while within the zone.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement periods. This section
will be enforced from 8 p.m. through
10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2008, and if
necessary due to inclement weather,
from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July
17, 2008.
Dated: May 20, 2008.
Brian D. Kelley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. E8–12475 Filed 6–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Jun 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0349]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Fireworks, Central and
Northern Massachusetts
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes the
temporary creation of safety zones for
fireworks events being held on several
waterways of Massachusetts this
summer. These safety zones will last for
the limited duration of the six fireworks
events occurring near the water along
the central and northern portions of
Massachusetts’ Atlantic Coast. The
zones are necessary to protect
spectators, participants, and vessels
from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
July 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2008–0349 to the Docket
Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Chief Eldridge McFadden at
617–223–5160. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31785
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to use the Docket Management Facility.
Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’
paragraph below.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–0349),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that we can contact you if we have
questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and
material by electronic means, mail, fax,
or delivery to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES;
but please submit your comments and
material by only one means. If you
submit them by mail or delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger
than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change this proposed rule in view of
them.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Enter the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–0349) in the
Search box, and click ‘‘Go >>.’’ You may
also visit either the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the DOT West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays; or the U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Boston, 427
Commercial Street, Boston, MA 02109
between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 4, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31782-31785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12475]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2008-0391]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Upper Potomac River, Washington
Channel, Washington Harbor, DC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
upon specified waters of the Upper Potomac River. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during
a fireworks display launched from a barge located within Washington
Channel, in Washington Harbor, DC. This action will restrict vessel
traffic in a portion of the Washington Channel.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before July 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2008-0391 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
(1) Online: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground Floor of the West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202-366-9329.
[[Page 31783]]
(4) Fax: 202-493-2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, at (410)
576-2674 or (410) 576-2693. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management
Facility. Please see DOT's ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-0391), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address,
an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail,
fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one
means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period. We may change this
proposed rule in view of them.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov at
any time. Enter the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG-2008-0391)
in the Search box, and click ``Go >>.'' You may also visit either the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays; or the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins
Point Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226-1791, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of
Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Fireworks displays are frequently held from locations on or near
the navigable waters of the United States. The accidental discharge of
fireworks and falling hot embers or other debris are a safety concern
during such events. The Coast Guard has the authority to impose
appropriate controls on marine events that may pose a threat to
persons, vessels and facilities under its jurisdiction. The purpose of
this rule is to promote maritime safety, and to protect mariners
transiting the area from the potential hazards associated with a
fireworks display. The rule is needed to control movement in a portion
of the waterway that is expected to be populated by spectators seeking
to view the fireworks display and mariners operating unknowingly too
close to the fireworks discharge site.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
In support of its 2008 Centennial Boule, marking the 100th
anniversary of its founding, the Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. will
sponsor a fireworks display in Washington Harbor, DC. The planned
fireworks event includes a fifteen-minute aerial display launched from
a barge in the Washington Channel at 9:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 16,
2008.
To provide for the safety of spectators and transiting vessels, the
Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland is proposing to establish a
safety zone that will be enforced during the fireworks display held on
specified waters of the Upper Potomac River. The proposed rule
establishes a safety zone on the waters of the Washington Channel,
within a 150-yard radius of the fireworks barge in approximate position
latitude 38[deg]52'09'' N, longitude 077[deg]01'13'' W, located within
the Washington Channel in Washington Harbor, DC. The rule will impact
the movement of all persons and vessels operating in specified waters
of the Washington Channel, from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 16,
2008, and if necessary due to inclement weather, from 8 p.m. through
10:30 p.m. on July 17, 2008.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. There is
little commercial vessel traffic during the enforcement period.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to operate, remain or anchor within
certain waters of the Washington Channel, in Washington Harbor, DC,
from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2008, and if necessary due
to inclement weather, from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 17, 2008.
Because the zone is of
[[Page 31784]]
limited duration, it is expected that there will be minimal disruption
to the maritime community. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard
will issue maritime advisories widely available to users of the
waterway to allow mariners to make alternative plans for transiting the
affected area. In addition, smaller vessels not constrained by their
draft, which are more likely to be small entities, may transit around
the safety zone.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Mr. Ronald Houck, at Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Waterways Management Division, at telephone number
(410) 576-2674 or (410) 576-2693. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is not likely to
have a significant effect on the human environment. The rule
establishes a temporary safety zone. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-0391 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0391 Safety zone; Fireworks Display, Upper Potomac
River, Washington Channel, Washington Harbor, DC.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, Captain of the
Port, Baltimore, Maryland means the
[[Page 31785]]
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland to act on his or her behalf.
(b) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Upper Potomac River, surface to bottom, within a 150-yard radius of
the fireworks barge in approximate position latitude 38[deg]52'09'' N,
longitude 077[deg]01'13'' W, located within the Washington Channel in
Washington Harbor, DC. All coordinates reference North American Datum
1983.
(c) Regulations:
(1) The general regulations governing safety zones, found in Sec.
165.23, apply to the safety zone described in paragraph (b) of this
section.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited, unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
moving safety zone must first request authorization from the Captain of
the Port, Baltimore, Maryland to seek permission to transit the area.
The Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland can be contacted at
telephone number (410) 576-2693. The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this
section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF Channel 16 (156.8
MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the person or vessel shall proceed as
directed. If permission is granted, all persons or vessels must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland,
and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course
while within the zone.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced from 8 p.m.
through 10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2008, and if necessary due to inclement
weather, from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 17, 2008.
Dated: May 20, 2008.
Brian D. Kelley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. E8-12475 Filed 6-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P