Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission in Part, 30881-30883 [E8-11996]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 104 / Thursday, May 29, 2008 / Notices
initiate over land-line connections to
the toll-free telephone number. Persons
with hearing impairments may also
follow the proceedings by first calling
the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–977–
8339 and providing the Service with the
conference call number and access code.
To ensure that the Commission
secures an appropriate number of lines
for the public, persons are asked to
register by contacting Alfreda Greene of
the Eastern Regional Office, 202–376–
7533, TTY 202–376–8116 by 4:00 p.m.,
on June 11, 2008.
Members of the public are entitled to
submit written comments. The
comments must be received in the
regional office by June 30, 2008. The
address is 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite
740, Washington, DC 20425. Comments
may be e-mailed to agreene@usccr.gov.
Records generated by this meeting may
be inspected and reproduced at the
Eastern Regional Office, as they become
available, both before and after the
meeting. Persons interested in the work
of this advisory committee are advised
to go to the Commission’s Web site,
https://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the
Eastern Regional Office at the above email or street address.
The meeting will be conducted
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the Commission and
FACA.
Dated in Washington, DC, May 23, 2008.
Christopher Byrnes,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E8–12019 Filed 5–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Sunshine Act Notice
United States Commission on
Civil Rights.
ACTION: Notice of briefing and meeting.
DATE AND TIME: Friday, June 6, 2008;
9:30 a.m.
PLACE: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights,
624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540,
Washington, DC 20425.
BRIEFING AGENDA: Topic: Review of the
Department of Justice’s Plans to Monitor
Voting Rights Enforcement for the 2008
U.S. Presidential Election.
I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
II. Speakers’ Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and
Staff Director.
IV. Adjourn Briefing.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
18:50 May 28, 2008
Dated: May 27, 2008.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 08–1309 Filed 5–27–08; 1:44 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–570–868)
Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from
the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 29, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita or Benjamin Caryl, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4243 or (202) 482–
3003, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 26, 2007, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published the initiation of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on folding
metal tables and chairs from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 72 FR 41057 (July 26, 2007). This
review covers the period June 1, 2006,
through May 31, 2007.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of Review
Meeting Agenda:
I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes.
• May 9, 2008 Meeting.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
III. Announcements.
IV. Staff Director’s Report.
V. Management and Operations.
• FY 2009 Budget Submission.
VI. Program Planning.
• 2010 Program Planning.
VII. State Advisory Committee Issues.
• Florida SAC.
• Kentucky SAC.
• Wyoming SAC.
VIII. Future Agenda Items.
IX. Adjourn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public
Affairs Unit, (202) 376–8582.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30881
Act’’), the Department shall make a
preliminary determination in an
administrative review of an
antidumping duty order within 245
days after the last day of the anniversary
month of the date of publication of the
order. The Act further provides,
however, that the Department may
extend that 245-day period to 365 days
if it determines it is not practicable to
complete the review within the
foregoing time period.
On March 4, 2008, the Department
published a notice of extension of time
limit for the preliminary results of this
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order. See Folding
Metal Tables and Chairs from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR
11615 (March 4, 2008). The preliminary
results of review are currently due no
later than May 30, 2008.
The Department finds that it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
folding metal tables and chairs from the
PRC within this time limit. Specifically,
due to complex issues related to the
selection of surrogate values, we find
that additional time is needed to
complete these preliminary results.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department
is now fully extending the time period
for completion of the preliminary
results of this review to 365 days until
June 29, 2008. Because June 29, 2008,
falls on a Sunday, the preliminary
results will be due June 30, 2008, the
next business day.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: May 22, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–11992 Filed 5–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–533–809
Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges
from India; Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Rescission in Part
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 5, 2008, the
Department of Commerce (the
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
30882
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 104 / Thursday, May 29, 2008 / Notices
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
forged stainless steel flanges (stainless
steel flanges) from India manufactured
by Shree Ganesh Forgings, Ltd. (Shree
Ganesh) and Nakshatra Enterprises Pvt.,
Ltd. (Nakshatra) covering the period
February 1, 2006, through January 31,
2007. See Certain Forged Stainless Steel
Flanges from India; Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Intent to Rescind
Administrative Review in Part, 73 FR
11863 (March 5, 2008) (Preliminary
Results). Based on further analysis of
our computations for Shree Ganesh, we
have made changes in the margin
calculation; therefore, the final results
differ from the preliminary results for
Shree Ganesh. The final weighted–
average dumping margin for Shree
Ganesh is listed below in the section
entitled, ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ We
are also rescinding the review for
Nakshatra because we have determined
that it had no bona fide U.S. sales
during the period of review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 29, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Background
On March 5, 2008, the Department
published the Preliminary Results. In
response to the Department’s invitation
to comment on the preliminary results
of review, Shree Ganesh submitted two
sets of comments. However, we received
these comments after the deadline for
submitting comments, and they were
not filed in proper form. Therefore, we
returned them to Shree Ganesh, and
have not considered them in these final
results of review. See the Department’s
letter to Shree Ganesh dated April 17,
2008.
We also received a request from the
law firm of Miller Chevalier to extend
the briefing period to allow for further
briefing on behalf of Shree Ganesh. We
received this request from Miller
Chevalier on April 7, 2008, after the
comment period had already closed. We
denied the request. See the
Department’s letter to Miller Chevalier
dated April 17, 2008.
We received no comments from
Nakshatra.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:45 May 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
Period of Review
The period of review (POR) is
February 1, 2006, to January 31, 2007.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are certain forged stainless steel flanges,
both finished and not finished,
generally manufactured to specification
ASTM A–182, and made in alloys such
as 304, 304L, 316, and 316L. The scope
includes five general types of flanges.
They are weld–neck, used for butt–weld
line connection; threaded, used for
threaded line connections; slip–on and
lap joint, used with stub–ends/butt–
weld line connections; socket weld,
used to fit pipe into a machined
recession; and blind, used to seal off a
line. The sizes of the flanges within the
scope range generally from one to six
inches; however, all sizes of the above–
described merchandise are included in
the scope. Specifically excluded from
the scope of this order are cast stainless
steel flanges. Cast stainless steel flanges
generally are manufactured to
specification ASTM A–351. The flanges
subject to this order are currently
classifiable under subheadings
7307.21.1000 and 7307.21.5000 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS).
Although the HTS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise under review is dispositive
of whether or not the merchandise is
covered by the scope of the order.
Partial Rescission of Review
In the preliminary results, we stated
that we intended to rescind the review
with respect to Nakshatra because we
had determined, based on the totality of
the circumstances, that Nakshatra’s U.S.
sales were not bona fide. See
Preliminary Results at 11866. Nakshatra
submitted no comments, and we have
found no basis for changing the
determination announced in the
preliminary results. Therefore we are
rescinding the review with respect to
Nakshatra.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the computer
programming used in the preliminary
results, we have made the following
changes to the margin calculation for
Shree Ganesh:
• We changed the names of two of the
data sets to ensure use of the proper
data;
• We removed language converting the
variables for packing (PACKU) and total
cost of manufacture (TCOMU) into U.S.
dollars because the currency conversion
for those variables is made later in the
program;
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• We removed language converting
variable cost of manufacturing
(VCOMU) into U.S. dollars because the
conversion was unnecessary;
• We deleted references to constructed
value (CV) data because Shree Ganesh
did not submit a separate CV data base;
• We removed some of the language
from the macro program because it was
overriding some of the language written
into the SAS program.
See the final results analysis
memorandum for additional details.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, the
Department finds the following
weighted–average dumping margin
exists for the period February 1, 2006,
through January 31, 2007:
Manufacturer/Exporter
Shree Ganesh Forgings, Ltd. ................
Margin (percent)
42.93
Assessment
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries, pursuant to
section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Tariff Act), and
19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department
calculated an assessment rate for each
importer of the subject merchandise
covered by the review.
For any importer–specific assessment
rates calculated in the final results that
are above de minimis (i.e., at or above
0.50 percent), we will issue
appraisement instructions directly to
CBP to assess antidumping duties on
appropriate entries by applying the
assessment rate to the entered value of
the merchandise. We will issue
assessment instructions to CBP fifteen
days after publication of these final
results of review.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Notice of Policy
Concerning Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This
clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by Shree Ganesh for which
Shree Ganesh did not know the
merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the 162.14 percent all–others
rate if there is no company–specific rate
for an intermediary involved in the
transaction. See id. for a full discussion
of this clarification.
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 104 / Thursday, May 29, 2008 / Notices
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of these final results of
administrative review, consistent with
section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: (1)
the cash deposit rate for the reviewed
company will be the rate listed above;
(2) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, but was covered in a
previous review or the original less–
than-fair–value (LTFV) investigation,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company–specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
LTFV investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 162.14
percent, the all–others rate established
in the LTFV investigation. See
Amended Final Determination and
Antidumping Duty Order; Certain
Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from
India, 59 FR 5994, 5995 (February 9,
1994). These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until publication of the final results of
the next administrative review.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred, and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APOs) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return or destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:50 May 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act.
Dated: May 20, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–11996 Filed 5–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request—Customer Satisfaction
Surveys (Fast-Track Recall Survey,
Ombudsman Survey, State Partner
Survey, Hotline Survey, Web-site
Survey, and Clearinghouse Survey)
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35) (PRA), the Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
requests comments on a proposed
request for an extension of its PRA
approval to conduct surveys to
determine customers’ level of
satisfaction with existing services. The
Commission will consider all comments
received in response to this notice
before requesting approval of this
collection of information from the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: Written comments must be
received by the Office of the Secretary
not later than July 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be captioned ‘‘Customer Satisfaction
Surveys’’ and e-mailed to the Office of
the Secretary at cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.
Comments may also be sent by facsimile
to (301) 504–0127, or by mail to the
Office of the Secretary, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 East
West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland
20814.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about this proposed
extension of approval of the collection
of information, or to obtain a copy of the
questions to be used for this collection
of information, call or write Linda Glatz,
Division of Policy and Planning, Office
of Information Technology and
Technology Services, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814;
telephone: (301) 504–7671 or by e-mail
to lglatz@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30883
A. Background
OMB has approved CPSC information
collection activity using customer
satisfaction surveys, OMB Control No.
0341–0128. CPSC seeks extension of
that approval for six customer
satisfaction surveys to determine the
kind and quality of services CPSC
customers want and customers’ level of
satisfaction with existing services.
‘‘Customers’’ of CPSC include any
individual or entity interested in or
affected by agency activities. These
would include, but not be limited to: (1)
Consumers that telephone the Hotline or
access the CPSC Web-site via the
internet to report product-related
incidents, or to obtain information on
recent product recalls; (2) consumers,
industry members, or others that contact
the National Injury Information
Clearinghouse for information; (3) State
representatives who work with CPSC on
cooperative programs; (4) firms that use
CPSC’s Fast-Track Product Recall
Program to report and simultaneously
propose satisfactory product recall
plans; and (5) small businesses that seek
information or assistance from the
CPSC’s small business ombudsman.
These customer surveys are used by
the CPSC Office of Financial
Management, Planning and Evaluation
to prepare sections of the agency’s
annual performance plan and
accountability report in accordance with
the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993. The information
from the surveys will provide measures
of the quality and effectiveness of
agency efforts related to three goals in
its strategic plan: informing the public,
industry services, and customer
satisfaction. If this information is not
collected, the Commission would not
have the means to measure its
effectiveness in providing useful
services to consumers and others, and
lack information necessary to guide
program development.
B. Estimated Burden
The surveys will be conducted by inhouse staff primarily through internet,
telephone, or in writing. The CPSC staff
may: (1) Conduct customer service
follow-up queries with a sample of
telephone Hotline callers; (2) survey a
sample of firms that use Fast-Track
Product Recall and Ombudsman
Programs to assess their views and
suggestions for improvements in the
services aspects of the program; (3)
conduct a sample survey of state
partners and customers of the National
Injury Information Clearinghouse; and
(4) obtain web-based survey information
on customer satisfaction with the
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 104 (Thursday, May 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30881-30883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1199]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-533-809
Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India; Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission in Part
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 5, 2008, the Department of Commerce (the
[[Page 30882]]
Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on certain forged stainless steel
flanges (stainless steel flanges) from India manufactured by Shree
Ganesh Forgings, Ltd. (Shree Ganesh) and Nakshatra Enterprises Pvt.,
Ltd. (Nakshatra) covering the period February 1, 2006, through January
31, 2007. See Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India;
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Intent to Rescind Administrative Review in Part, 73 FR 11863 (March 5,
2008) (Preliminary Results). Based on further analysis of our
computations for Shree Ganesh, we have made changes in the margin
calculation; therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary
results for Shree Ganesh. The final weighted-average dumping margin for
Shree Ganesh is listed below in the section entitled, ``Final Results
of Review.'' We are also rescinding the review for Nakshatra because we
have determined that it had no bona fide U.S. sales during the period
of review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 29, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2924 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 5, 2008, the Department published the Preliminary Results.
In response to the Department's invitation to comment on the
preliminary results of review, Shree Ganesh submitted two sets of
comments. However, we received these comments after the deadline for
submitting comments, and they were not filed in proper form. Therefore,
we returned them to Shree Ganesh, and have not considered them in these
final results of review. See the Department's letter to Shree Ganesh
dated April 17, 2008.
We also received a request from the law firm of Miller Chevalier to
extend the briefing period to allow for further briefing on behalf of
Shree Ganesh. We received this request from Miller Chevalier on April
7, 2008, after the comment period had already closed. We denied the
request. See the Department's letter to Miller Chevalier dated April
17, 2008.
We received no comments from Nakshatra.
Period of Review
The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2006, to January 31,
2007.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are certain forged stainless
steel flanges, both finished and not finished, generally manufactured
to specification ASTM A-182, and made in alloys such as 304, 304L, 316,
and 316L. The scope includes five general types of flanges. They are
weld-neck, used for butt-weld line connection; threaded, used for
threaded line connections; slip-on and lap joint, used with stub-ends/
butt-weld line connections; socket weld, used to fit pipe into a
machined recession; and blind, used to seal off a line. The sizes of
the flanges within the scope range generally from one to six inches;
however, all sizes of the above-described merchandise are included in
the scope. Specifically excluded from the scope of this order are cast
stainless steel flanges. Cast stainless steel flanges generally are
manufactured to specification ASTM A-351. The flanges subject to this
order are currently classifiable under subheadings 7307.21.1000 and
7307.21.5000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). Although the HTS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise under review is dispositive of
whether or not the merchandise is covered by the scope of the order.
Partial Rescission of Review
In the preliminary results, we stated that we intended to rescind
the review with respect to Nakshatra because we had determined, based
on the totality of the circumstances, that Nakshatra's U.S. sales were
not bona fide. See Preliminary Results at 11866. Nakshatra submitted no
comments, and we have found no basis for changing the determination
announced in the preliminary results. Therefore we are rescinding the
review with respect to Nakshatra.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the computer programming used in the
preliminary results, we have made the following changes to the margin
calculation for Shree Ganesh:
We changed the names of two of the data sets to ensure use of
the proper data;
We removed language converting the variables for packing
(PACKU) and total cost of manufacture (TCOMU) into U.S. dollars because
the currency conversion for those variables is made later in the
program;
We removed language converting variable cost of manufacturing
(VCOMU) into U.S. dollars because the conversion was unnecessary;
We deleted references to constructed value (CV) data because
Shree Ganesh did not submit a separate CV data base;
We removed some of the language from the macro program because
it was overriding some of the language written into the SAS program.
See the final results analysis memorandum for additional details.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, the Department finds the following
weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period February 1, 2006,
through January 31, 2007:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer/Exporter Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shree Ganesh Forgings, Ltd........................ 42.93
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries, pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Tariff Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department
calculated an assessment rate for each importer of the subject
merchandise covered by the review.
For any importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final
results that are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 percent), we
will issue appraisement instructions directly to CBP to assess
antidumping duties on appropriate entries by applying the assessment
rate to the entered value of the merchandise. We will issue assessment
instructions to CBP fifteen days after publication of these final
results of review.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Notice of Policy Concerning Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This clarification will apply to
entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Shree Ganesh
for which Shree Ganesh did not know the merchandise was destined for
the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the 162.14 percent all-others rate if there is no
company-specific rate for an intermediary involved in the transaction.
See id. for a full discussion of this clarification.
[[Page 30883]]
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date of these final results of administrative
review, consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: (1) the
cash deposit rate for the reviewed company will be the rate listed
above; (2) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, but
was covered in a previous review or the original less-than-fair-value
(LTFV) investigation, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the
original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 162.14 percent,
the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation. See Amended
Final Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; Certain Forged
Stainless Steel Flanges from India, 59 FR 5994, 5995 (February 9,
1994). These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until publication of the final results of the next administrative
review.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred, and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding.
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act.
Dated: May 20, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-11996 Filed 5-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-S
