University of Dayton Research Institute, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications, for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes, 30051 [E8-11624]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Notices Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Fax number (202) 395–7285 or via the Internet at David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov. Dated: May 20, 2008. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. E8–11600 Filed 5–22–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of each instrument. Dated: May 19, 2008. Faye Robinson, Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff, Import Administration. [FR Doc. E8–11624 Filed 5–22–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S International Trade Administration dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES University of Dayton Research Institute, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications, for DutyFree Entry of Electron Microscopes DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 2104, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Docket Number: 08–010. Applicant: University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH 45469–0106. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model FEI Quanta 600 FEG. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008. Docket Number: 08–011. Applicant: University of Minnesota Institute of Technology Characterization Facility, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai G2 F30 Twin. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008. Docket Number: 08–012. Applicant: Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model FEI Inspect S. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008. Docket Number: 08–013. Applicant: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai G2 20 Twin. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008. (A–533–813) VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:27 May 22, 2008 Jkt 214001 International Trade Administration Certain Preserved Mushrooms from India: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final Results of Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 8, 2008, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) sustained the results of redetermination made by the Department of Commerce (the Department) pursuant to the CIT’s remand in Agro Dutch Industries Limited v. United States, Slip Op. 07– 185 (December 26, 2007) (Agro Dutch II). See Agro Dutch Industries Limited v. United States, Slip Op. 08–50 (May 8, 2008) (Agro Dutch III). Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), the Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department’s final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from India covering the period of review (POR) of February 1, 2000, through January 31, 2001. See Certain Preserved Mushrooms From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 67 FR 46172 (July 12, 2002), and accompanying Issues and Decisions Memorandum (Final Results). EFFECTIVE DATE: May 23, 2008. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30051 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Katherine Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4136 or (202) 482– 4929, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 12, 2002, the Department issued its final results in the antidumping duty administrative review of certain preserved mushrooms from India covering the POR of February 1, 2000, through January 31, 2001. See Final Results. Agro Dutch challenged three aspects of the Department’s Final Results: (1) that the use of partial facts available and adverse inferences for certain of its sales was improper; (2) that the methodology used to determine Agro Dutch’s constructed value was in error; and (3) that the calculation of its imputed credit expenses was in error. In Agro Dutch Industries Limited v. United States, Slip Op. 07–25 (February 16, 2007) (Agro Dutch I), the CIT upheld the Department’s determinations on issues (2) and (3) regarding constructive value and imputed credit expense methodologies. However, with respect to the first issue, that the use of partial facts available and adverse inferences for certain of Agro Dutch’s sales was improper, the CIT instructed the Department on remand to revisit its determination that the use of partial facts available and adverse inferences was warranted for the transactions where the Department applied them. On March 3, 2007, the Department filed its remand redetermination and further explained its use and application of facts available in this review. In Agro Dutch II, the CIT did not accept the Department’s explanation and again remanded the case to the Department, instructing the Department to either reopen the proceeding for the limited purpose of obtaining satisfactory answers to the Department’s questions that generated the Department’s use of partial facts available, or make a determination on the basis of facts available without imputing an adverse inference on the record evidence obtained during the review. On April 3, 2008, the Department issued its final results of redetermination pursuant to Agro Dutch II. The remand redetermination explained that, in accordance with the CIT’s instructions, the Department analyzed the information on the record and made its determination for certain Agro Dutch sales on the basis of facts E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM 23MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 101 (Friday, May 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 30051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Dayton Research Institute, et al., Notice of 
Consolidated Decision on Applications, for Duty-Free Entry of Electron 
Microscopes

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be 
viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 2104, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 08-010. Applicant: University of Dayton Research 
Institute, Dayton, OH 45469-0106. Instrument: Electron Microscope, 
Model FEI Quanta 600 FEG. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. 
Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
    Docket Number: 08-011. Applicant: University of Minnesota Institute 
of Technology Characterization Facility, Minneapolis, MN 55455. 
Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai G2 F30 Twin. 
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 73 
FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
    Docket Number: 08-012. Applicant: Alfred E. Mann Foundation for 
Scientific Research, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Instrument: Electron 
Microscope, Model FEI Inspect S. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 
Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
    Docket Number: 08-013. Applicant: National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai G2 20 
Twin. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice 
at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and 
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an 
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.

    Dated: May 19, 2008.
Faye Robinson,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-11624 Filed 5-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S