University of Dayton Research Institute, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications, for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes, 30051 [E8-11624]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Notices
Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dHynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk
Officer, Fax number (202) 395–7285 or
via the Internet at
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: May 20, 2008.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–11600 Filed 5–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as these
instruments are intended to be used,
was being manufactured in the United
States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign
instrument is an electron microscope
and is intended for research or scientific
educational uses requiring an electron
microscope. We know of no electron
microscope, or any other instrument
suited to these purposes, which was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated: May 19, 2008.
Faye Robinson,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff,
Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–11624 Filed 5–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
International Trade Administration
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
University of Dayton Research
Institute, et al., Notice of Consolidated
Decision on Applications, for DutyFree Entry of Electron Microscopes
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
This is a decision consolidated
pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part
301). Related records can be viewed
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in
Room 2104, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 08–010. Applicant:
University of Dayton Research Institute,
Dayton, OH 45469–0106. Instrument:
Electron Microscope, Model FEI Quanta
600 FEG. Manufacturer: FEI Company,
Czech Republic. Intended Use: See
notice at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
Docket Number: 08–011. Applicant:
University of Minnesota Institute of
Technology Characterization Facility,
Minneapolis, MN 55455. Instrument:
Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai G2
F30 Twin. Manufacturer: FEI Company,
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
Docket Number: 08–012. Applicant:
Alfred E. Mann Foundation for
Scientific Research, Santa Clarita, CA
91355. Instrument: Electron Microscope,
Model FEI Inspect S. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Czech Republic. Intended
Use: See notice at 73 FR 21310, April
21, 2008.
Docket Number: 08–013. Applicant:
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
MD 20892. Instrument: Electron
Microscope, Model Tecnai G2 20 Twin.
Manufacturer: FEI Company,
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
(A–533–813)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:27 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
International Trade Administration
Certain Preserved Mushrooms from
India: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony with Final Results of
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 8, 2008, the United
States Court of International Trade (CIT)
sustained the results of redetermination
made by the Department of Commerce
(the Department) pursuant to the CIT’s
remand in Agro Dutch Industries
Limited v. United States, Slip Op. 07–
185 (December 26, 2007) (Agro Dutch
II). See Agro Dutch Industries Limited v.
United States, Slip Op. 08–50 (May 8,
2008) (Agro Dutch III). Consistent with
the decision of the United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(CAFC) in Timken Co. v. United States,
893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken),
the Department is notifying the public
that the final judgment in this case is
not in harmony with the Department’s
final results of the administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
certain preserved mushrooms from
India covering the period of review
(POR) of February 1, 2000, through
January 31, 2001. See Certain Preserved
Mushrooms From India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 67 FR 46172 (July 12, 2002),
and accompanying Issues and Decisions
Memorandum (Final Results).
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 23, 2008.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30051
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Goldberger or Katherine Johnson,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–
4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 12, 2002, the Department
issued its final results in the
antidumping duty administrative review
of certain preserved mushrooms from
India covering the POR of February 1,
2000, through January 31, 2001. See
Final Results. Agro Dutch challenged
three aspects of the Department’s Final
Results: (1) that the use of partial facts
available and adverse inferences for
certain of its sales was improper; (2) that
the methodology used to determine
Agro Dutch’s constructed value was in
error; and (3) that the calculation of its
imputed credit expenses was in error.
In Agro Dutch Industries Limited v.
United States, Slip Op. 07–25 (February
16, 2007) (Agro Dutch I), the CIT upheld
the Department’s determinations on
issues (2) and (3) regarding constructive
value and imputed credit expense
methodologies. However, with respect
to the first issue, that the use of partial
facts available and adverse inferences
for certain of Agro Dutch’s sales was
improper, the CIT instructed the
Department on remand to revisit its
determination that the use of partial
facts available and adverse inferences
was warranted for the transactions
where the Department applied them.
On March 3, 2007, the Department
filed its remand redetermination and
further explained its use and
application of facts available in this
review. In Agro Dutch II, the CIT did not
accept the Department’s explanation
and again remanded the case to the
Department, instructing the Department
to either reopen the proceeding for the
limited purpose of obtaining satisfactory
answers to the Department’s questions
that generated the Department’s use of
partial facts available, or make a
determination on the basis of facts
available without imputing an adverse
inference on the record evidence
obtained during the review.
On April 3, 2008, the Department
issued its final results of
redetermination pursuant to Agro Dutch
II. The remand redetermination
explained that, in accordance with the
CIT’s instructions, the Department
analyzed the information on the record
and made its determination for certain
Agro Dutch sales on the basis of facts
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 101 (Friday, May 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 30051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11624]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
University of Dayton Research Institute, et al., Notice of
Consolidated Decision on Applications, for Duty-Free Entry of Electron
Microscopes
This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966
(Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be
viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 2104, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 08-010. Applicant: University of Dayton Research
Institute, Dayton, OH 45469-0106. Instrument: Electron Microscope,
Model FEI Quanta 600 FEG. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic.
Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
Docket Number: 08-011. Applicant: University of Minnesota Institute
of Technology Characterization Facility, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai G2 F30 Twin.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 73
FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
Docket Number: 08-012. Applicant: Alfred E. Mann Foundation for
Scientific Research, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Instrument: Electron
Microscope, Model FEI Inspect S. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech
Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
Docket Number: 08-013. Applicant: National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD 20892. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai G2 20
Twin. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice
at 73 FR 21310, April 21, 2008.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated: May 19, 2008.
Faye Robinson,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-11624 Filed 5-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
