Bolton Metal Products Co. Bellefonte, PA; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 28169-28170 [E8-10883]
Download as PDF
28169
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 95 / Thursday, May 15, 2008 / Notices
APPENDIX—TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 4/28/08 AND 5/2/08—Continued
TA–W
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
63265 ................
Intel Corporation, California Technology and Manufacturing
(CTM) Group (Comp).
Lester Enterprises, Inc. dba LHP Corporation (Comp) ........
Shane Hunter, Inc. (Wkrs) ....................................................
Key Plastics, LLC (Wkrs) .....................................................
Daimler Trucks North America (Freight Liner LLC) (Wkrs) ..
Beck Manufacturing, a Div. of Anvil International, Inc.
(Comp).
Horton Automatics (Comp) ...................................................
Pfaltzgraff (Wkrs) ..................................................................
Sherman Textile Company (Comp) ......................................
Schindler Elevator Corp (Comp) ..........................................
Plastic Trim International, Inc. (Comp) .................................
Quip Industries/Tim Bolk, Owner (State) .............................
Timbuk 2 (Wkrs) ...................................................................
Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation (USW) ....................
Geiger (Wkrs) .......................................................................
Sears Holdings HR Support Center (Comp) ........................
J L Bray and Son (Union) ....................................................
Barco, Inc. (State) ................................................................
Kimball Office (Comp) ..........................................................
Kimball International General Office (Comp) .......................
Office Furniture Group Shared Services (Comp) .................
Brunswick Bowling (AFL–CIO) .............................................
Paulstra CRC (Comp) ..........................................................
Sigma Industries, Inc. (Comp) ..............................................
Lakewood Engineering and Manufacturing Co. (Comp) ......
L B Furniture Industries, LLC (IUECWA) .............................
Tanks Manufacturing (Wkrs) ................................................
Syncreon-US/Jefferson North Assembly Operation (Comp)
Wausau Paper Specialty Products, LLC (Comp) .................
Hughes Lumber Company (Wkrs) ........................................
Visteon Concordia (UAW) ....................................................
Ornamental Products, LLC (Wkrs) .......................................
Snider Transportation Service (State) ..................................
HD Supply, Inc. (Wkrs) .........................................................
Siegel Robert Automotive (State) .........................................
Fisher and Company/Fisher Dynamics (Comp) ...................
Santa Clara, CA ....................
04/29/08
04/24/08
Hartwell, GA ..........................
San Francisco, CA ................
Felton, PA .............................
Cleveland, NC .......................
Santa Fe Springs, CA ...........
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/28/08
04/18/08
04/28/08
04/22/08
04/15/08
Corpus Christi, TX ................
York, PA ................................
Dallas, NC .............................
Sidney, OH ............................
Dayton, OH ...........................
Carlyle, IL ..............................
San Francisco, CA ................
Allenport, PA .........................
Lewiston, ME ........................
Tucker, GA ............................
Salida, CA .............................
Beaverton, OR ......................
Jasper, IN ..............................
Jasper, IN ..............................
Jasper, IN ..............................
Muskegon, MI .......................
Novi, MI .................................
Springport, MI .......................
Chicago, IL ............................
Hudson, NY ...........................
Lakeview, OR ........................
Detroit, MI .............................
Columbus, WI .......................
Central Point, OR ..................
Concordia, MO ......................
High Point, NC ......................
Tyler, TX ...............................
Monroe, NC ...........................
Farmington, MO ....................
St. Clair Shores, MI ..............
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/30/08
04/30/08
04/30/08
04/30/08
04/30/08
04/30/08
04/30/08
04/30/08
04/30/08
04/30/08
05/01/08
05/01/08
05/01/08
05/01/08
05/01/08
05/01/08
05/01/08
05/02/08
05/02/08
05/02/08
05/02/08
05/02/08
05/02/08
04/10/08
04/24/08
04/28/08
04/28/08
04/28/08
04/28/08
04/28/08
04/21/08
04/23/08
04/21/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/16/08
04/25/08
04/30/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/20/08
04/27/08
04/28/08
05/01/08
05/01/08
05/01/08
04/30/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
04/29/08
63266
63267
63268
63269
63270
................
................
................
................
................
63271
63272
63273
63274
63275
63276
63277
63278
63279
63280
63281
63282
63283
63284
63285
63286
63287
63288
63289
63290
63291
63292
63293
63294
63295
63296
63297
63298
63299
63300
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
[FR Doc. E8–10881 Filed 5–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,875]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Bolton Metal Products Co. Bellefonte,
PA; Notice of Revised Determination
on Reconsideration
On April 21, 2008, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application on
Reconsideration applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The notice was published in the Federal
Register on April 25, 2008 (73 FR
22434).
The previous investigation initiated
on February 21, 2008, resulted in a
negative determination issued on March
19, 2008, was based on the finding that,
during the relevant period, imports of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:18 May 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
brass rod, wire, and low melt alloys did
not contribute importantly to worker
separations at the subject firm and no
shift of production to a foreign source
occurred. The denial notice was
published in the Federal Register on
April 24, 2008 (73 FR 22170).
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner provided additional
information regarding production at the
subject firm, imports and customers.
Upon further investigation the
Department requested an additional list
of customers from the subject firm. New
information revealed that Bolton Metal
Products Co., Bellefonte, Pennsylvania
supplies brass rod, wire and low melt
alloys for hydraulic fittings produced by
the primary firm, and a loss of business
with a domestic manufacturer (whose
workers were certified eligible to apply
for adjustment assistance) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In accordance with Section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department of Labor
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
Date of
petition
herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older
workers.
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act must be met. The Department
has determined in this case that the
requirements of Section 246 have been
met.
A significant number of workers at the
firm are age 50 or over and possess
skills that are not easily transferable.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained on reconsideration, I
determine that workers of Bolton Metal
Products Co., Bellefonte, Pennsylvania
qualify as adversely affected secondary
workers under Section 222 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended. In accordance
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
28170
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 95 / Thursday, May 15, 2008 / Notices
with the provisions of the Act, I make
the following certification:
All workers of Bolton Metal Products Co.,
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, who became totally
or partially separated from employment on or
after February 18, 2007, through two years
from the date of this certification, are eligible
to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC this 9th day of
May 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–10883 Filed 5–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–225]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
The Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;
Notice of Acceptance for Docketing of
the Application and Notice of
Opportunity for Hearing Regarding
Renewal of the Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute Reactor Critical Facility
Facility License No. CX–22 for an
Additional 20-Year Period
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC or the Commission) is considering
an application for the renewal of
Facility License No. CX–22, which
authorizes the Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute (RPI or the licensee) to operate
the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Reactor Critical Facility (RCF) at 100
watts thermal power. The renewed
license would authorize the licensee to
operate the RCF for an additional 20
years from the date of issuance.
On November 19, 2002, the
Commission’s staff received an
application from RPI filed pursuant to
10 CFR 50.51(a), to renew Facility
License No. CX–22 for the RCF. Because
the license renewal application was
filed in a timely manner in accordance
with 10 CFR 2.109, the license will not
be deemed to have expired until the
license renewal application has been
finally determined.
Based on its initial review of the
application, the Commission’s staff
determined that RPI submitted
sufficient information in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.33 and 50.34 so that the
application is acceptable for docketing.
The current Docket No. 50–225 for
Facility License No. CX–22 will be
retained. The docketing of the renewal
application does not preclude requests
for additional information as the review
proceeds, nor does it predict whether
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:18 May 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
the Commission will grant or deny the
application. Prior to a decision to renew
the license, the Commission will make
findings required by the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and
the Commission’s rules and regulations.
Within 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice, the applicant
may file a request for a hearing, and any
person(s) whose interest may be affected
by this proceeding and who wishes to
participate as a party in the proceeding
must file a written request for a hearing
and a petition for leave to intervene, via
electronic submission through the NRC
E-filing system. Requests for a hearing
and a petition for leave to intervene
shall be filed in accordance with the
Commission’s ‘‘Rules of Practice for
Domestic Licensing Proceedings’’ in 10
CFR part 2. Interested person(s) should
consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309,
which is available at the Commission’s
PDR, located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland and on the NRC Web site,
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr. Publicly available
records will be accessible from the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System’s (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. If
a request for a hearing or petition for
leave to intervene is filed by the above
date, the Commission or a presiding
officer designated by the Commission or
by the Chief Administrative Judge of the
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Panel, will rule on the request and/or
petition; and the Secretary or the Chief
Administrative Judge of the Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board will issue a
notice of a hearing or an appropriate
order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a
petition for leave to intervene shall set
forth with particularity the interest of
the petitioner/requestor in the
proceeding, and how that interest may
be affected by the results of the
proceeding. The petition should
specifically explain the reasons why
intervention should be permitted with
particular reference to the following
general requirements: (1) The name,
address and telephone number of the
requestor or petitioner; (2) the nature of
the requestor’s/petitioner’s right under
the Act to be made a party to the
proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of
the requestor’s/petitioner’s property,
financial, or other interest in the
proceeding; and (4) the possible effect of
any decision or order which may be
entered in the proceeding on the
requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
petition must also identify the specific
contentions which the petitioner/
requestor seeks to have litigated at the
proceeding.
Each contention must consist of a
specific statement of the issue of law or
fact to be raised or controverted. In
addition, the petitioner/requestor shall
provide a brief explanation of the bases
for the contention and a concise
statement of the alleged facts or expert
opinion which support the contention
and on which the petitioner intends to
rely in proving the contention at the
hearing. The petitioner must also
provide references to those specific
sources and documents of which the
petitioner is aware and on which the
petitioner intends to rely to establish
those facts or expert opinion. The
petition must include sufficient
information to show that a genuine
dispute exists with the applicant on a
material issue of law or fact.
Contentions shall be limited to matters
within the scope of the licensing action
(i.e., license renewal) under
consideration. The contention must be
one which, if proven, would entitle the
petitioner/requestor to relief. A
petitioner/requestor who fails to satisfy
these requirements with respect to at
least one contention will not be
permitted to participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become
parties to the proceeding, subject to any
limitations in the order granting leave to
intervene, and have the opportunity to
participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing.
A request for hearing or a petition for
leave to intervene must be filed in
accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule,
which the NRC promulgated on August
28, 2007 (72 FR 49139). The E-Filing
process requires participants to submit
and serve documents over the Internet
or in some cases to mail copies on
electronic storage media. Participants
may not submit paper copies of their
filings unless they seek a waiver in
accordance with the procedures
described below.
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least ten
(10) days prior to the filing deadline, the
petitioner/requestor must contact the
Office of the Secretary by e-mail at
hearingdocket@nrc.gov, or by calling
(301) 415–1677, to request (1) a digital
ID certificate, which allows the
participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any proceeding in which it is
participating; and/or (2) creation of an
electronic docket for the proceeding
(even in instances in which the
petitioner/requestor (or its counsel or
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 95 (Thursday, May 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28169-28170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10883]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-62,875]
Bolton Metal Products Co. Bellefonte, PA; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
On April 21, 2008, the Department issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application on Reconsideration applicable to
workers and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on April 25, 2008 (73 FR 22434).
The previous investigation initiated on February 21, 2008, resulted
in a negative determination issued on March 19, 2008, was based on the
finding that, during the relevant period, imports of brass rod, wire,
and low melt alloys did not contribute importantly to worker
separations at the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign
source occurred. The denial notice was published in the Federal
Register on April 24, 2008 (73 FR 22170).
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided
additional information regarding production at the subject firm,
imports and customers.
Upon further investigation the Department requested an additional
list of customers from the subject firm. New information revealed that
Bolton Metal Products Co., Bellefonte, Pennsylvania supplies brass rod,
wire and low melt alloys for hydraulic fittings produced by the primary
firm, and a loss of business with a domestic manufacturer (whose
workers were certified eligible to apply for adjustment assistance)
contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of
separation.
In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C.
2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results
of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply
for alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility
to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 of
the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined in this case
that the requirements of Section 246 have been met.
A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and
possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions
within the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional facts obtained on
reconsideration, I determine that workers of Bolton Metal Products Co.,
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania qualify as adversely affected secondary
workers under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In
accordance
[[Page 28170]]
with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification:
All workers of Bolton Metal Products Co., Bellefonte,
Pennsylvania, who became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after February 18, 2007, through two years from the
date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also
eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC this 9th day of May 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-10883 Filed 5-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P