Proposed Exemptions Involving: D-11363-Citation Box and Paper Co. Profit Sharing Plan and Retirement Trust; and D-11435-Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and BlackRock, Inc., 26415-26431 [E8-10263]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5486).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on January 8, 2008. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on February 8, 2008 (73 FR 7592).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. E8–10136 Filed 5–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Open SystemC Initiative
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Notice is hereby given that, on March
25, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Open SystemC
Initiative (‘‘OSCI’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Maple Design Automation
Co., Ltd., Gwacheon, REPUBLIC OF
KOREA; Texas Instruments
Incorporated, Stafford, TX; and
Virtutech, Inc., San Jose, CA have been
added as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and OSCI intends
to file additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On October 9, 2001, OSCI filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on January 3, 2002 (67 FR 350).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on December 11, 2007.
A notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on January 28, 2008 (73 FR 4918).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. E8–10146 Filed 5–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Ultrafine Grained
Titanium for Near-Net Shape Forging—
a Pathway to Titanium Market
Expansion
Notice is hereby given that, on
December 17, 2007, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
Ultrafine Grained Titanium for Near-net
Shape Forging—A Pathway to Titanium
Market Expansion has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the identities
of the parties to the venture and (2) the
nature and objectives of the venture.
The notifications were filed for the
purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are: ATI AIlvac, Monroe, NC;
and GE Global Research, Niskayuna,
NY. The general area of this group
research project’s planned activity is to
develop a novel ultrafine grained
titanium billet process that will enable
both near-net shape forging of standard
alloys into complex components for
aviation, energy, transportation and
military markets.
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. E8–10139 Filed 5–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission
[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 4–08]
Sunshine Act Meeting
The Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission, pursuant to its regulations
(45 CFR Part 504) and the Government
in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b),
hereby gives notice in regard to the
scheduling of meetings for the
transaction of Commission business and
other matters specified, as follows:
DATE AND TIME: Thursday, May 29, 2008,
at 1 p.m.
SUBJECT MATTER: Issuance of Proposed
Decisions, Amended Proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26415
Decisions, and Orders in claims against
Albania.
STATUS: Open.
All meetings are held at the Foreign
Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E
Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests
for information, or advance notices of
intention to observe an open meeting,
may be directed to: Administrative
Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room
6002, Washington, DC 20579.
Telephone: (202) 616–6988.
Dated at Washington, DC.
Mauricio J. Tamargo,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 08–1247 Filed 5–7–08; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
[Application Nos. D–11363 & D–11435]
Proposed Exemptions Involving: D–
11363—Citation Box and Paper Co.
Profit Sharing Plan and Retirement
Trust; and D–11435—Merrill Lynch &
Co., Inc. and BlackRock, Inc.
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemption.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains a
notice of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of
proposed exemptions from certain of the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code).
Written Comments and Hearing
Requests
All interested persons are invited to
submit written comments or requests for
a hearing on the pending exemption,
unless otherwise stated in the Notice of
Proposed Exemption, within 45 days
from the date of publication of this
Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1)
The name, address, and telephone
number of the person making the
comment or request, and (2) the nature
of the person’s interest in the exemption
and the manner in which the person
would be adversely affected by the
exemption. A request for a hearing must
also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the
evidence to be presented at the hearing.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and
requests for a hearing (at least three
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26416
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
copies) should be sent to the Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), Office of Exemption
Determinations, Room N–5649, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Attention: Application No. ll, stated
in each Notice of Proposed Exemption.
Interested persons are also invited to
submit comments and/or hearing
requests to EBSA via e-mail or FAX.
Any such comments or requests should
be sent either by e-mail to:
moffitt.betty@dol.gov, or by FAX to
(202) 219–0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The
application for exemption and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–1513,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemption
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication
in the Federal Register. Such notice
shall include a copy of the notice of
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed exemption was requested in
applications filed pursuant to section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in
accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR
32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section
102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of
1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Therefore, this notice of proposed
exemption is issued solely by the
Department.
The application contains
representations with regard to the
proposed exemption which is
summarized below. Interested persons
are referred to the application on file
with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and
representations.
Citation Box and Paper Co. Profit
Sharing Plan and Retirement Trust (the
Plan), Located in Chicago, Illinois
[Exemption Application Number: D–
11363].
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering
granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act
and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code and
in accordance with the procedures set
forth in 29 CFR Part 2570 Subpart B (55
FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). If
the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A) and
(D), and sections 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of
the Act, and the sanctions resulting
from the application of section 4975 of
the Code, by reason of sections
4975(c)(1)(A), (D), and (E) of the Code,
shall not apply to the proposed sale of
improved real property (the Property) by
the Plan to a partnership to be
comprised of Anthony J. Kostiuk (the
Applicant and Plan Fiduciary), Anthony
L. Kostiuk, Edmund Chmiel, Andre
Frydl, and David Marinier, each of
whom is a party in interest with respect
to the Plan, provided that the following
conditions are satisfied:
(a) The sale is a one-time transaction
for cash;
(b) As a result of the sale, the Plan
receives the greater of: (i) $975,000; (ii)
The fair market value of the Property as
of the date of the transaction as
determined by a qualified, independent
appraiser; or (iii) The cost to the Plan to
acquire and hold the Property;
(c) The Plan pays no commissions,
fees or other expenses in connection
with the sale;
(d) The terms and conditions of the
sale are at least as favorable as those
obtainable in an arm’s length
transaction with an unrelated third
party;
(e) With respect to any lease payments
for the occupancy of the Property that
were made by the Citation Box and
Paper Co. (the Company) to the Plan on
or after July 1, 1996 and which (in the
opinion of an MAI-certified, qualified
independent appraiser) amounted to
less than the fair market rental value of
the Property at the time of such
payment, the Company reimburses the
Plan, prior to publication of a final grant
of this requested prohibited transaction
exemption, for the full amount of all
such rental shortfalls in the form of a
lump sum payment in arrears plus
interest as calculated in conformity with
the requirements of section 5(b)(5) of the
Department’s Voluntary Fiduciary
Correction (VFC) Program described at
71 FR 20262 (April 19, 2006); and
(f) To the extent that there are rental
shortfalls referenced in paragraph (e),
the Applicant shall provide the
Department with all relevant
documentation pertaining to the
calculation of such shortfall (including
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the fair market rental value of the
Property for each applicable lease year,
the amount of the rental shortfall for
each year, the interest attributable to the
rental shortfall for each year, and proof
that the reimbursement was paid to the
Plan) prior to publication of a final grant
of this requested prohibited transaction
exemption.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. The Plan is a defined contribution
profit sharing plan sponsored by the
Citation Box and Paper Co. (the
Company), which is headquartered in
Chicago, Illinois. As of June 30, 2006,
the Plan had approximately 34
participants and total assets of
approximately $3,107,545. The Plan’s
current and sole trustee is the
Applicant, who is also a participant in
the Plan and the owner of the Company.
Anthony L. Kostiuk, Edmund Chmiel,
Andre Frydl, and David Marinier are
also participants in the Plan and,
together with the Applicant, intend to
establish a partnership that will
purchase a parcel of improved real
property (the Property), located at 4700
West Augusta Boulevard in Chicago,
Illinois, from the Plan. The Applicant
states that, in submitting this exemption
application to the Department, he is
authorized to represent the interests of
his intended co-partners (Messrs. A. L.
Kostiuk, Chmiel, Frydl, and Marinier) in
the acquisition of the Property from the
Plan.
2. The Applicant represents that the
Property covers a gross area of 76,444
square feet, and is irregular in shape.
The Applicant represents that the
Property was acquired by the Plan from
the Company on November 18, 1971 at
a cost of $294,000.1 The Property
contains a two-story loft industrial
structure (the Building) that houses the
Company’s warehouse and office
facilities. The Applicant represents that
the surface area of the Building at
ground level totals 41,821 square feet.
The Applicant represents that a parcel
of land adjacent to the Property (the
Adjacent Parcel) previously owned by
the Belt Railway Company (the Railway)
of Chicago was purchased in 2005 by
1 The Applicant has provided a copy of the 1984
exemption application (the 1984 Application)
submitted on behalf of the Plan which culminated
in the grant of PTE 85–7. The 1984 Application
states that the Property was originally purchased by
the Plan in 1971 for a price of $294,000. According
to the Applicant, the 1984 Notice of Proposed
Exemption (49 FR 43131, October 26, 1984)
contains a typographical error, because it states that
the Property was acquired by the Plan for $249,000.
In addition, the Notice of Proposed Exemption
states that the Property is approximately 76,000
square feet in area; In the current application, as
noted above, the Applicant represents that the more
precise figure is 76,444 square feet.
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
Citation Properties, LLC, a singlemember limited liability company
whose sole member is the Applicant.
Prior to its acquisition by the Company,
the Applicant represents that Adjacent
Parcel had been leased to the Company
by the Railway to provide parking
facilities, as well as access to and egress
from the Property. The Applicant
represents that this lease predated the
Department’s issuance of a previous
administrative exemption, PTE 85–7 (50
FR 1006, January 8, 1985), involving the
Plan and the Property at issue in this
proposal. The Applicant represents that
the Adjacent Parcel is rectangular in
shape and covers an area of 17,600
square feet. The Applicant represents
that the Plan has not paid the Company
or Citation Properties, LLC for the use
of the Adjacent Parcel since it was
acquired from the Railway. The
Applicant also represents that the
remaining lots adjacent to the Property
are owned by persons unrelated to the
Company, the Applicant, and the
intended co-partners.
3. PTE 85–7 (the Original Exemption)
permitted the Plan to lease the Property
to the Company on a continuous basis
on or after July 1, 1984, provided that
‘‘the terms and conditions of such
leasing are at least as favorable to the
Plan as those which the Plan could
receive in a similar transaction with an
unrelated party.’’ The material facts and
representations supporting the
Department’s grant of the Original
Exemption were contained in a Notice
of Proposed Exemption published on
October 26, 1984, at 49 FR 43131 (the
1984 Notice).
4. Since it acquired the Property in
1971, the Plan has leased the Property
to the Company on a continuous basis.
Each of the successive lease agreements
executed between the Plan and the
Company since the time of the
acquisition have been ‘‘absolute net
leases’’ requiring the company to be
responsible for all upkeep, repair, fire
insurance premiums, and taxes on the
Property. According to the Summary of
Facts and Representations contained in
the 1984 Notice published prior to the
issuance of PTE 85–7, the Original
Exemption was intended to permit the
continued leasing (the Lease) of the
Property by the Plan to the Company
until June 30, 1994, with three five-year
options from such date.
The 1984 Notice further stated that
‘‘[t]he Lease provides that for each
three-year period during the initial tenyear term and during each option period
thereafter the rental amount would be
adjusted based upon an MAI appraisal
report as to the then-current fair rental
value.’’ The terms of the original Lease
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
executed on January 16, 1984, stipulated
that the fair rental value of the Property
would be updated two months prior to
July 1, 1987 (and triennially thereafter
through the year 2008), by an
independent, MAI-certified appraiser.
5. According to the 1984 Notice, an
independent fiduciary (originally
Unibanc Trust Company, subsequently
replaced in March of 1986 by Harris
Trust and Savings Bank (Harris Trust))
was to exercise authority and control
over and have responsibility for the
operation of the lease. In addition, the
1984 Notice represented that this
fiduciary was to have sole discretion to
monitor the lease and enforce the rights
of the Plan under the terms and
conditions of any such lease.2 In April
of 2004, the Company informed Harris
Trust that it was exercising its option
under the lease agreement to extend the
term of the lease for an additional
period of five years beginning on July 1,
2004, and ending on June 30, 2009.
The Applicant represents that Harris
Trust notified the Company in April of
2004 that it would no longer serve as an
independent fiduciary to the Plan after
May 31, 2004, because it was no longer
providing retirement plan services to its
clients. This line of business was sold
by Harris Trust to another financial
institution, Wells Fargo Investment and
Trust Company (Wells Fargo). Upon
receiving notification of Harris Trust’s
withdrawal, the Plan Fiduciary
contacted Wells Fargo to inquire about
its willingness to serve as a replacement
independent fiduciary with respect to
the monitoring of the Lease described in
the Original Exemption. While it did
assume various retirement plan services
for the Plan previously performed by
Harris Trust, Wells Fargo declined the
Plan Fiduciary’s request to serve as an
independent fiduciary with respect to
the Lease. The Applicant represents that
the Plan Fiduciary then approached two
other financial institutions to serve as a
replacement independent fiduciary.
However, neither of these institutions
expressed a willingness to serve the
Plan in such a capacity.
6. As part of its current exemption
application with the Department, the
Plan Fiduciary submitted copies of a
series of fair market rental appraisals of
the Property for several prior lease
terms. The applicant represents that
each of these prior appraisals was
prepared by a qualified, independent
appraiser, Urban Real Estate Research,
Inc. (Urban Real Estate) of Chicago,
2 The Department expresses no opinion herein as
to whether the Plan’s continued ownership and
leasing of the Property is consistent with the
general fiduciary responsibility provisions of Part 4
of Title I of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26417
Illinois, and signed by Mr. Arthur J.
Murphy, MAI, a certified general real
estate appraiser licensed by the State of
Illinois. In each of these appraisal
reports, Urban Real Estate reported that
the Property covered an approximate
area of 72,844 square feet. In providing
this approximate square footage figure
(which is less than the 76,444 square
foot area represented by the Applicant
as the accurate size of the Property), the
Applicant represents that Urban Real
Estate used the measurement from the
Realty Atlas Map. The Applicant also
represents that the Realty Atlas Map is
almost illegible, and appeared to
indicate that the Property occupied
approximately 241.31 feet of frontage
along the north side of West Augusta
Boulevard. The Applicant further
represents, however, that a plat of
survey conducted by the National
Survey Service, Inc. shows that the
actual frontage is actually 291.31 feet, a
50-foot difference. The Applicant also
acknowledges that, since at least July 1,
2006 (i.e., during the pendency of the
current prohibited transaction
exemption request), the annual rent
paid by the Company to the Plan for the
Property has been less than the fair
rental value of the Property as
determined by Urban Real Estate.
7. The Applicant further represents
that a second real estate appraiser,
Muriello Appraisal and Consulting
(Muriello Appraisal) of Elk Grove
Village, Illinois, was retained by the
Plan for the purpose of determining the
fair market value of the Property in
connection with the sale. The Applicant
represents that Muriello Appraisal is
independent of, and unrelated to, the
Company, the Applicant, and the
intended co partners. Muriello
Appraisal represents that less than 1%
of its gross annual revenue was derived
from appraisal services performed for
the Plan and the Company.
On June 18, 2007, an updated
appraisal report was issued by Muriello
Appraisal concerning the fair market
value of the Property as of June 11,
2007. The updated report was signed by
Frank J. Muriello, MAI (a general real
estate appraiser licensed by the State of
Illinois) and Paul J. Muriello, a senior
appraiser also licensed by the State of
Illinois. In this updated report, Muriello
Appraisal states that consideration was
given in the appraisal to three
approaches to value: The cost approach,
the sales comparison approach, and the
income capitalization approach. Relying
upon the sales comparison approach,
Muriello Appraisal issued a report dated
June 18, 2007 which stated that the fair
market value of the Property was
$975,000 as of June 11, 2007. The
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
26418
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
Applicant later determined, however,
that the appraisal report improperly
aggregated the values of both the
Property and the Adjacent Parcel in
arriving at the $975,000 figure. The
Applicant represents that Paul Muriello
has subsequently acknowledged in
writing that, if the Adjacent Parcel were
disaggregated from the June, 2007,
appraisal, the standalone value of the
Property may have to be adjusted below
$975,000. Nevertheless, the Applicant
represents that the proposed partnership
is willing to pay the Plan the greater of
$975,000 or the fair market value of the
Property on the date of the transaction.
8. Accordingly, the Applicant
proposes a one-time cash sale of the
Property by the Plan to the proposed
partnership for the greater of (1)
$975,000 or (2) the fair market value of
the Property on the date of the
transaction as established by a qualified,
independent appraiser. The Applicant
represents that no Plan assets or monies
allocated to individual participant
accounts in the Plan will be utilized to
purchase the Property. The Applicant
further states that the proposed
partnership intends to obtain financing
from a financial institution to enable the
sale of the Property in exchange for
cash; the financial institution selected
for this purpose shall be independent of
and unrelated to the Company, the
Applicant, and the intended copartners.
Any mortgage obtained by the proposed
partnership in connection with the
acquisition of the Property shall be a
nonrecourse loan with no obligations or
liability to the Plan. The Applicant
represents that the sale of the Property
by the Plan is administratively feasible
in that it will be a one-time transaction
for cash. The Applicant also represents
that the sale is in the interests of the
Plan because it would provide
additional liquidity to the Plan. In
addition, the Applicant represents that
the sale is protective of the interests of
the Plan because the cash proceeds
derived from the sale of the Property
will be invested in a manner that
diversifies the assets of the Plan.
9. In summary, the proposed
transaction satisfies the requirements of
section 408(a) of the Act because: (a)
The sale is a one-time transaction for
cash; (b) As a result of the sale, the Plan
receives the greater of (i) $975,000, (ii)
the fair market value of the Property as
of the date of the transaction as
determined by a qualified, independent
appraiser, or (iii) the cost to the Plan to
acquire and hold the Property; (c) The
Plan pays no commissions, fees or other
expenses in connection with the sale;
(d) The terms and conditions of the sale
are at least as favorable as those
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
obtainable in an arm’s length
transaction with an unrelated third
party; (e) With respect to any lease
payments for the occupancy of the
Property that were made by the
Company to the Plan on or after July 1,
1996 and which (in the opinion of an
MAI-certified, qualified independent
appraiser) amounted to less than the fair
market rental value of the Property at
the time of such payment, the Company
reimburses the Plan, prior to publication
of a final grant of this requested
prohibited transaction exemption, for
the full amount of all such rental
shortfalls in the form of a lump sum
payment in arrears plus interest as
calculated in conformity with the
requirements of section 5(b)(5) of the
Department’s Voluntary Fiduciary
Correction (VFC) Program described at
71 FR 20262 (April 19, 2006); and (f) To
the extent that there are rental shortfalls
referenced in paragraph (e), the
Applicant shall provide the Department
with all relevant documentation
pertaining to the calculation of such
shortfall (including the fair market
rental value of the Property for each
applicable lease year, the amount of the
rental shortfall for each year, the interest
attributable to the rental shortfall for
each year, and proof that the
reimbursement was paid to the Plan)
prior to publication of a final grant of
this prohibited transaction exemption.
Notice to Interested Persons: A copy
of this notice of the proposed exemption
(the Notice) shall be given to all
interested persons in the manner agreed
upon by the applicant and the
Department within fifteen (15) days of
the date of its publication in the Federal
Register. The Department must receive
all written comments and requests for a
hearing no later than forty-five (45) days
after publication of the Notice in the
Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mark Judge of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8339. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (ML&Co.) and
BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock);
(Collectively, the Applicants), Located
in New York, New York
[Exemption Application No. D–11435].
Proposed Exemption
Based on the facts and representations
set forth in the application, the
Department of Labor (the Department) is
considering granting an exemption
under the authority of section 408(a) of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (the Act) and
section 4975(c)(2) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code) and in
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accordance with the procedures set
forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55
FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990):
1. Definitions
(a) For purposes of this proposed
exemption, the term ‘‘Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities’’
includes all entities listed in Section
I(a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3):
(1) Merrill Lynch & Co. (i.e., ML&Co.)
and any person directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries,
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with ML&Co.,
(2) BlackRock, Inc. (i.e., BlackRock)
and any person directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries,
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with BlackRock, and
(3) Any entity that meets the
definition of a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity during the term of the
exemption.
(b) For purposes of section (a), the
term ‘‘control’’ means the power to
exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a person
other than an individual.
2. General Conditions
(a) The applicable Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
maintain(s) or cause(s) to be maintained
for a period of six (6) years from the date
of any transaction described herein,
such records as are necessary to enable
the persons described in paragraph (b)
to determine whether the conditions of
this exemption were met, except that—
(1) If the records necessary to enable
the persons described in paragraph
(b)(1)(i)–(iv) to determine whether the
conditions of the exemption have been
met are lost or destroyed, due to
circumstances beyond the control of the
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities, then no prohibited
transaction will be considered to have
occurred solely on the basis of the
unavailability of those records; and
(2) No party in interest with respect
to a plan which engages in the covered
transactions, other than any Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities, shall be subject to the civil
penalty that may be assessed under
section 502(i) of the Act or to the taxes
imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of
the Code if the records have not been
maintained or are not available for
examination as required by paragraph
(b) below.
(b)(1) Except as provided below in
paragraph (b)(2), and notwithstanding
the provisions of subsections (a)(2) and
(b) of section 504 of the Act, the records
referred to above in paragraph (a) above
are unconditionally available for
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
examination during normal business
hours at their customary location to the
following persons or an authorized
representative thereof—
(i) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department or the
Internal Revenue Service, or the SEC; or
(ii) Any fiduciary of any plan that
engages in the covered transactions, or
any duly authorized employee or
representative of such fiduciary; or
(iii) Any employer of participants and
beneficiaries and any employee
organization whose members are
covered by a plan that engages in the
transactions covered herein, or any
authorized employee or representative
of these entities; or
(iv) Any participant or beneficiary of
a plan that engages in the transactions
covered herein, or duly authorized
representative of such participant or
beneficiary;
(2) None of the persons described
above in paragraph (b)(1)(ii)–(iv) shall
be authorized to examine trade secrets
of the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities, or commercial or
financial information, which is
privileged or confidential; and
(3) Should the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
refuse to disclose information on the
basis that such information is exempt
from disclosure, pursuant to paragraph
(b)(2) above, the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
shall, by the thirtieth (30th ) day
following the request, provide a written
notice advising that person of the
reasons for the refusal and that the
Department may request such
information.
3. Exemptions From Prohibitions
Respecting Certain Classes of
Transactions Involving Employee
Benefit Plans and Certain BrokerDealers and Banks—Underwritings
The restrictions of sections 406 of the
Act, and the taxes imposed by reason of
section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by
reason of section 4975(c)(1) of the Code,
shall not apply to the purchase or other
acquisition of certain securities by an
employee benefit plan during the
existence of an underwriting or selling
syndicate with respect to such
securities, from any person other than a
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities, when such Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities is
a fiduciary with respect to such plan,
and a member of such syndicate,
provided that the following conditions
are met:
(a) No Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities which is
involved in any way in causing the plan
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
to make the purchase is a manager of
such underwriting or selling syndicate.
For purposes of this exemption, the
term ‘‘manager’’ means any member of
an underwriting or selling syndicate
who, either alone or together with other
members of the syndicate, is authorized
to act on behalf of the members of the
syndicate in connection with the sale
and distribution of the securities being
offered or who receives compensation
from the members of the syndicate for
its services as a manager of the
syndicate.
(b) The securities to be purchased or
otherwise acquired are—
(1) Part of an issue registered under
the Securities Act of 1933 or, if exempt
from such registration requirement, are
(i) issued or guaranteed by the United
States or by any person controlled or
supervised by and acting as an
instrumentality of the United States
pursuant to authority granted by the
Congress of the United States, (ii) issued
by a bank, (iii) issued by a common or
contract carrier, if such issuance is
subject to the provisions of section 20a
of the Interstate Commerce Act, as
amended, (iv) exempt from such
registration requirement pursuant to a
Federal statute other than the Securities
Act of 1933, or (v) are the subject of a
distribution and are of a class which is
required to be registered under section
12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 781), and the issuer of
which has been subject to the reporting
requirements of section 13 of the Act (15
U.S.C. 78m) for a period of at least 90
days immediately preceding the sale of
securities and has filed all reports
required to be filed thereunder with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
during the preceding 12 months.
(2) Purchased at not more than the
public offering price prior to the end of
the first full business day after the final
term of the securities have been fixed
and announced to the public, except
that—
(i) if such securities are offered for
subscription upon exercise of rights,
they are purchased on or before the
fourth day preceding the day on which
the rights offering terminates; or
(ii) if such securities are debt
securities, they may be purchased at a
public offering price on a day
subsequent to the end of such first full
business day, provided that the interest
rates on comparable debt securities
offered to the public subsequent to such
first full business day and prior to the
purchase are less than the interest rate
of the debt securities being purchased.
(3) Offered pursuant to an
underwriting agreement under which
the members of the syndicate are
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26419
committed to purchase all of the
securities being offered, except if—
(i) such securities are purchased by
others pursuant to a rights offering; or
(ii) such securities are offered
pursuant to an over-allotment option.
(c) The issuer of such securities has
been in continuous operation for not
less than three years, including the
operations of any predecessors, unless—
(1) Such securities are nonconvertible debt securities rated in one
of the four highest rating categories by
at least one of the following rating
organizations: Standard & Poor’s Rating
Services, Moody’s Investors Service,
Inc., Fitch Ratings Inc., Dominion Bond
Ratings Service Limited, and Dominion
Bond Rating Service, Inc., or any
successors thereto;
(2) Such securities are issued or fully
guaranteed by a person described in
paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this exemption; or
(3) Such securities are issued or fully
guaranteed by a person who has issued
securities described in paragraph
(b)(1)(ii), (iii), (iv) or (v), and this
paragraph (c) of this exemption.
(d) The amount of such securities to
be purchased or otherwise acquired by
the plan does not exceed 3% of the total
amount of such securities being offered.
(e) The consideration to be paid by
the plan in purchasing or otherwise
acquiring such securities does not
exceed three percent of the fair market
value of the total assets of the plan as
of the last day of the most recent fiscal
quarter of the plan prior to such
transaction, provided that if such
consideration exceeds $1 million, it
does not exceed 1% of such fair market
value of the total assets of the plan.
If such securities are purchased by the
plan from a party in interest or
disqualified person with respect to the
plan, such party in interest or
disqualified person shall not be subject
to the civil penalty which may be
assessed under section 502(i) of the Act,
or to the taxes imposed by section
4975(a) and (b) of the Code, if the
conditions of this exemption are not
met. However, if such securities are
purchased from a party in interest or
disqualified person with respect to the
plan, the restrictions of section 406(a) of
the Act shall apply to any fiduciary with
respect to the plan and the taxes
imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of
the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (D) of the Code,
shall apply to such party in interest or
disqualified person, unless the
conditions for exemption of PTE 75–1
(40 FR 50845, October 31, 1975), Part II
(relating to certain principal
transactions) are met.
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26420
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
4. Exemptions From Prohibitions
Respecting Certain Classes of
Transactions Involving Employee
Benefit Plans and Certain BrokerDealers, Reporting Broker-Dealers and
Banks—Market-Making
The restrictions of sections 406 of the
Act, and the taxes imposed by section
4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1) of the Code, shall
not apply to any purchase or sale of any
securities by an employee benefit plan
from or to a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities which is a
market-maker with respect to such
securities, when a Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities is
also a fiduciary with respect to such
plan, provided that the following
conditions are met:
(a) The issuer of such securities has
been in continuous operation for not
less than three years, including the
operations of any predecessors, unless—
(1) Such securities are nonconvertible debt securities rated in one
of the four highest rating categories by
at least one of the following rating
organizations: Standard & Poor’s Rating
Services, Moody’s Investors Service,
Inc., Fitch Ratings Inc., Dominion Bond
Ratings Service Limited, and Dominion
Bond Rating Service, Inc., or any
successors thereto;
(2) Such securities are issued or
guaranteed by the United States or by
any person controlled or supervised by
and acting as an instrumentality of the
United States pursuant to authority
granted by the Congress of the United
States; or
(3) Such securities are fully
guaranteed by a person described in this
paragraph (a).
(b) As a result of purchasing such
securities—
(1) The fair market value of the
aggregate amount of such securities
owned, directly or indirectly, by the
plan and with respect to which such
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities is a fiduciary, does not
exceed 3% of the fair market value of
the assets of the plan with respect to
which such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities is a fiduciary,
as of the last day of the most recent
fiscal quarter of the plan prior to such
transaction, provided that if the fair
market value of such securities exceeds
$1 million, it does not exceed one
percent of such fair market value of
such assets of the plan, except that this
paragraph shall not apply to securities
described in (a)(2) of this exemption;
and
(2) The fair market value of the
aggregate amount of all securities for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
which such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities is a marketmaker, which are owned, directly or
indirectly, by the plan and with respect
to which such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities is a fiduciary,
does not exceed 10% of the fair market
value of the assets of the plan with
respect to which such Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities is
a fiduciary, as of the last day of the most
recent fiscal quarter of the plan prior to
such transaction, except that this
paragraph shall not apply to securities
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
exemption.
(c) At least one person other than a
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities is a market-maker with
respect to such securities.
(d) The transaction is executed at a
net price to the plan for the number of
shares or other units to be purchased or
sold in the transaction which is more
favorable to the plan than that which
such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities acting as fiduciary and
acting in good faith, reasonably believes
to be available at the time of such
transaction from all other marketmakers with respect to such securities.
For purposes of this exemption, the
term ‘‘market-maker’’ shall mean any
specialist permitted to act as a dealer,
and any dealer who, with respect to a
security, holds himself out (by entering
quotations in an inter-dealer
communications system or otherwise) as
being willing to buy and sell such
security for his own account on a
regular or continuous basis.
5. Exemption Involving Mutual Fund InHouse Plans
The restrictions of sections 406 and
407(a) of the Act and the taxes imposed
by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1) of the
Code, shall not apply to the acquisition
or sale of shares of an open-end
investment company registered under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 by
an employee benefit plan covering only
employees of such investment company,
employees of the investment adviser or
principal underwriter for such
investment company, or employees of
any affiliated person (as defined in
section 2(a)(3) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940) of such
investment adviser or principal
underwriter, provided that the
investment adviser or principal
underwriter or their affiliates are a
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities, and the following conditions
are met (whether or not such investment
company, investment adviser, principal
underwriter or any affiliated person
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
thereof is a fiduciary with respect to the
plan):
(a) The plan does not pay any
investment management, investment
advisory or similar fee to such
investment adviser, principal
underwriter or affiliated person. This
condition does not preclude the
payment of investment advisory fees by
the investment company under the
terms of its investment advisory
agreement adopted in accordance with
section 15 of the Investment Company
Act of 1940.
(b) The plan does not pay a
redemption fee in connection with the
sale by the plan to the investment
company of such shares unless (1) such
redemption fee is paid only to the
investment company, and (2) the
existence of such redemption fee is
disclosed in the investment company
prospectus in effect both at the time of
the acquisition of such shares and at the
time of such sale.
(c) The plan does not pay a sales
commission in connection with such
acquisition or sale.
(d) All other dealings between the
plan and the investment company, the
investment adviser or principal
underwriter for the investment
company, or any affiliated person of
such investment adviser or principal
underwriter are on a basis no less
favorable to the plan than such dealings
are with other shareholders of the
investment company.
6. Exemption for Certain Transactions
Between Investment Companies and
Employee Benefit Plans
The restrictions of section 406 of the
Act and the taxes imposed by section
4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1) of the Code, shall
not apply to the purchase or sale by an
employee benefit plan of shares of an
open-end investment company
registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, where the
investment adviser of the investment
company is a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities, who is also a
fiduciary with respect to the plan but
not an employer of employees covered
by the plan, provided that the following
conditions are met:
(a) The plan does not pay a sales
commission in connection with such
purchase or sale.
(b) The plan does not pay a
redemption fee in connection with the
sale by the plan to the investment
company of such shares unless (1) such
redemption fee is paid only to the
investment company, and (2) the
existence of such redemption fee is
disclosed in the investment company
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
prospectus in effect both at the time of
the purchase of such shares and at the
time of such sale.
(c) The plan does not pay an
investment management, investment
advisory or similar fee with respect to
the plan assets invested in such shares
for the entire period of such investment.
This condition does not preclude the
payment of investment advisory fees by
the investment company under the
terms of its investment advisory
agreement adopted in accordance with
section 15 of the Investment Company
Act of 1940. This condition also does
not preclude payment of an investment
advisory fee by the plan based on total
plan assets from which a credit has been
subtracted representing the plan’s pro
rata share of investment advisory fees
paid by the investment company. If,
during any fee period for which the plan
has prepaid its investment management,
investment advisory or similar fee, the
plan purchases shares of the investment
company, the requirement of this
paragraph (c) shall be deemed met with
respect to such prepaid fee if by a
method reasonably designed to
accomplish the same, the amount of the
prepaid fee that constitutes the fee with
respect to the plan assets invested in the
investment company shares (1) is
anticipated and subtracted from the
prepaid fee at the time of payment of
such fee, (2) is returned to the plan no
later than during the immediately
following fee period, or (3) is offset
against the prepaid fee for the
immediately following fee period or for
the fee period immediately following
thereafter. For purposes of this
paragraph (c), a fee shall be deemed to
be prepaid for any fee period if the
amount of such fee is calculated as of a
date not later than the first day of such
period.
(d) A second fiduciary with respect to
the plan, who is independent of and
unrelated to the fiduciary/investment
adviser or any affiliate thereof, receives
a current prospectus issued by the
investment company, and full and
detailed written disclosure of the
investment advisory and other fees
charged to or paid by the plan and the
investment company, including the
nature and extent of any differential
between the rates of such fees, the
reasons why the fiduciary/investment
adviser may consider such purchases to
be appropriate for the plan, and whether
there are any limitations on the
fiduciary/investment adviser with
respect to which plan assets may be
invested in shares of the investment
company and, if so, the nature of such
limitations. For purposes of this
paragraph (d), such second fiduciary
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
will not be deemed to be independent
of and unrelated to the fiduciary/
investment adviser or any affiliate
thereof if:
(1) Such second fiduciary directly or
indirectly controls, is controlled by, or
is under common with the fiduciary/
investment adviser or any affiliate
thereof;
(2) Such second fiduciary, or any
officer, director, partner, employee or
relative of such second fiduciary is an
officer, director, partner, employee or
relative of such fiduciary/investment
adviser or any affiliate thereof; or
(3) Such second fiduciary directly or
indirectly receives any compensation or
other consideration for his or her own
personal account in connection with
any transaction described in this
exemption.
If an officer, director, partner,
employee or relative of such fiduciary/
investment adviser or any affiliate
thereof is a director of such second
fiduciary, and if he or she abstains from
participation in (i) the choice of the
plan’s investment adviser, (ii) the
approval of any such purchase or sale
between the plan and the investment
company, and (iii) the approval of any
change of fees charged to or paid by the
plan, then paragraph (d) of this
exemption shall not apply.
For purposes of paragraph (d)(1)
above, the term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual, and the term ‘‘relative’’
means a ‘‘relative’’ as that term is
defined in section 3(15) of the Act (or
a ‘‘member of the family’’ as that term
is defined in section 4975(e)(6) of the
Code), or a brother, a sister, or a spouse
of a brother or a sister.
(e) On the basis of the prospectus and
disclosure referred to in paragraph (d),
the second fiduciary referred to in
paragraph (d) approves such purchases
and sales consistent with the
responsibilities obligations, and duties
imposed on fiduciaries by Part 4 of Title
I of the Act. Such approval may be
limited solely to the investment
advisory and other fees paid by the
mutual fund in relation to the fees paid
by the plan and need not relate to any
other aspects of such investments. In
addition, such approval must be either
(1) set forth in the plan documents or in
the investment management agreement
between the plan and the fiduciary/
investment adviser, (2) indicated in
writing prior to each purchase or sale,
or (3) indicated in writing prior to the
commencement of a specified purchase
or sale program in the shares of such
investment company.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26421
(f) The second fiduciary referred to in
paragraph (d), above, or any successor
thereto, is notified of any change in any
of the rates of fees referred to in
paragraph (d) and approves in writing
the continuation of such purchases or
sales and the continued holding of any
investment company shares acquired by
the plan prior to such change and still
held by the plan. Such approval may be
limited solely to the investment
advisory and other fees paid by the
mutual fund in relation to the fees paid
by the plan and need not relate to any
other aspects of such investment.
7. Exemption Involving Closed-End
Investment Company In-House Plans
The restrictions of sections 406 and
407(a) of the Act, and the taxes imposed
by section 4975 (a) and (b) of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1) of the
Code, shall not apply to the acquisition,
ownership or sale of shares of a closedend investment company which is
registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 and is not a small
business investment company as
defined by section 103 of the Small
Business Investment Company Act of
1958, by an employee benefit plan
covering only employees of such
investment company, employees of the
investment adviser of such investment
company, or employees of any affiliated
person (as defined in section 2(a)(3) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940) of
such investment company or investment
adviser, provided that such entity or
entities are a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities, and the
following conditions are met (whether
or not such investment company,
investment adviser or any affiliated
person thereof is a fiduciary with
respect to the plan):
(a) The plan does not pay any
investment management, investment
advisory, or similar fee to such
investment adviser or affiliated person.
This condition does not preclude the
payment of investment advisory fees by
the investment company under the
terms of its investment advisory
agreement adopted in accordance with
section 15 of the Investment Company
Act of 1940.
(b) The plan does not pay a sales
commission in connection with such
acquisition or sale to any such
investment company or to any such
investment company, investment
adviser or affiliated person; and
(c) All other dealings between the
plan and such investment company, the
investment adviser, or affiliated person,
are on a basis no less favorable to the
plan than such dealings are with other
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26422
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
shareholders of the investment
company.
8. Exemption for Securities
Transactions Involving Employee
Benefit Plans and Broker-Dealers
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Section I: Definition and Special Rules
The following definitions and special
rules apply to this exemption:
(a) The term ‘‘Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities’’
includes affiliates of such entity or
entities.
(b) An ‘‘affiliate’’ of a Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
includes the following:
(1) Any officer, director, partner,
employee, relative (as defined in section
3(15) of the Act), brother, sister, or
spouse of a brother or sister, of the
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities; and
(2) any corporation or partnership of
which the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities is an officer,
director or partner.
A person is not an affiliate of another
person solely because one of them has
investment discretion over the other’s
assets.
(c) An ‘‘agency cross transaction’’ is a
securities transaction in which the same
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities act(s) as agent for both any
seller and any buyer for the purchase or
sale of a security.
(d) The term ‘‘covered transaction’’
means an action described in Section II
(a), (b) or (c) of this exemption.
(e) The term ‘‘effecting or executing a
securities transaction’’ means the
execution of a securities transaction as
agent for another person and/or the
performance of clearance, settlement,
custodial or other functions ancillary
thereto.
(f) A plan fiduciary is independent of
a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities only if the fiduciary
has no relationship to or interest in such
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities that might affect the exercise
of such fiduciary’s best judgment as a
fiduciary.
(g) The term ‘‘profit’’ includes all
charges relating to effecting or executing
securities transactions, less reasonable
and necessary expenses including
reasonable indirect expenses (such as
overheard costs) properly allocated to
the performance of these transactions
under generally accepted accounting
principles.
(h) The term ‘‘securities transaction’’
means the purchase or sale of securities.
(i) The term ‘‘nondiscretionary
trustee’’ of a plan means a trustee or
custodian whose powers and duties
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
with respect to any assets of the plan are
limited to (1) the provision of
nondiscretionary trust services to the
plan, and (2) duties imposed on the
trustee by any provision or provisions of
the Act or the Code. The term
‘‘nondiscretionary trust services and
services’’ means custodial services and
services ancillary to custodial services,
none of which services are
discretionary. For purposes of this
exemption, a person does not fail to be
a nondiscretionary trustee solely by
reason of having been delegated, by the
sponsor of a master or prototype plan,
the power to amend such plan.
Section II: Covered Transactions
If each condition of Section III of this
exemption is either satisfied or not
applicable under Section IV of this
exemption, the restrictions of section
406(b) of the Act and the taxes imposed
by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code
by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(E) and
(F) of the Code shall not apply to—
(a) A Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities that is a plan
fiduciary using its authority to cause a
plan to pay a fee to a Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities as
agent for the plan, for effecting or
executing securities transactions, but
only to the extent that such transactions
are not excessive, under the
circumstances, in either amount or
frequency;
(b) A Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities that is a plan
fiduciary acting as the agent in an
agency cross transaction for both the
plan and one or more other parties to
the transaction; or
(c) The receipt by any Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities that
is a plan fiduciary of reasonable
compensation for effecting or executing
an agency cross transaction to which a
plan is a party from one or more other
parties to the transaction.
Section III: Conditions
Except to the extent otherwise
provided in Section IV of this
exemption, Section II of this exemption
applies only if the following conditions
are satisfied:
(a) The Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity engaging in the covered
transaction is not an administrator of
the plan, or an employer any of whose
employees are covered by the plan.
(b)(1) The covered transaction is
performed under a written authorization
executed in advance by a fiduciary of
each plan whose assets are involved in
the transaction, which plan fiduciary is
independent of the Merrill Lynch/
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
engaging in the covered transaction.
(2) For purposes of this exemption,
Section III(b) will be deemed satisfied
for the period commencing September
29, 2006, notwithstanding Merrill Lynch
Investment Managers, LLC (MLIM)’s
reliance on written authorizations
obtained prior to the consummation of
the Merger 3, provided that after the
closing of the Merger, MLIM notified
each such authorizing plan fiduciary of
the fact that: (A) As a result of the
Merger, MLIM had become a subsidiary
of BlackRock; (B) the existing
authorization by such authorizing plan
fiduciary would continue to permit
MLIM to engage in the covered
transaction on behalf of the plan; (C)
such authorization is terminable at will
by the plan, without penalty to the plan,
upon receipt by MLIM of written notice
from an authorizing plan fiduciary of
termination; (D) a form expressly
providing an election to terminate the
authorization with instructions on the
use of such form was supplied to each
such authorizing plan fiduciary; and (E)
failure to return such termination form
would result in the continued
authorization of MLIM to engage in the
covered transactions on behalf of the
plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
this exception does not apply to new
authorizations to engage in covered
transactions entered into after the
consummation of the Merger.
(c) The authorization referred to in
paragraph (b) of this Section is
terminable at will by the plan, without
penalty to the plan, upon receipt by the
authorized Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities of written
notice of termination. A form expressly
providing an election to terminate the
authorization described in paragraph (b)
of this Section with instructions on the
use of the form must be supplied to the
authorizing plan fiduciary no less than
annually. The instructions for such form
must include the following information:
(1) The authorization is terminable at
will by the plan, without penalty to the
plan, upon receipt by the authorized
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities of written notice from the
authorizing plan fiduciary or other plan
official having authority to terminate the
authorization; and
(2) Failure to return the form will
result in the continued authorization of
the authorized Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
3 On September 29, 2006, ML&Co. and BlackRock
consummated a transaction (the Merger), in which
ML&Co. contributed MLIM and various other assets
and subsidiaries that comprised its investment
management business to BlackRock in exchange for
approximately 45% of the outstanding voting
securities of BlackRock.
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
Related Entity or Entities to engage in
the covered transactions on behalf of the
plan.
(d) Within three months before an
authorization is made, the authorizing
plan fiduciary is furnished with any
reasonably available information that
the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities seeking authorization
reasonably believes to be necessary for
the authorizing plan fiduciary to
determine whether the authorization
should be made including (but not
limited to) a copy of this exemption, the
form for termination of authorization
described in Section III(c) of this
exemption, a description of the Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities’ brokerage placement practices,
and any other reasonably available
information regarding the matter that
the authorizing plan fiduciary requests.
(e) The Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities engaging in a
covered transaction furnishes the
authorizing plan fiduciary with either:
(1) A confirmation slip for each
securities transaction underlying a
covered transaction within ten business
days of the securities transaction
containing the information described in
Rule 10b–10(a)(1–7) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 17 CFR
240.10b–10; or
(2) at least once every three months
and not later than 45 days following the
period to which it relates, a report
disclosing:
(A) A compilation of the information
that would be provided to the plan
pursuant to subparagraph (e)(1) of this
Section during the three-month period
covered by the report;
(B) The total of all securities
transaction-related charges incurred by
the plan during such period in
connection with such covered
transactions; and
(C) The amount of the securities
transaction-related charges retained by
such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities and the amount of
such charges paid to other persons for
execution or other services.
For purposes of this paragraph (e), the
words ‘‘incurred by the plan’’ shall be
construed to mean ‘‘incurred by the
pooled fund’’ when such Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
engages in covered transactions on
behalf of a pooled fund in which the
plan participates.
(f) The authorizing plan fiduciary is
furnished with a summary of the
information required under paragraph
(e)(1) of this Section at least once per
year. The summary must be furnished
within 45 days after the end of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
period to which it relates, and must
contain the following:
(1) The total of all securities
transaction-related charges incurred by
the plan during the period in
connection with covered securities
transactions.
(2) The amount of the securities
transaction-related charges retained by
the authorized Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities and the
amount of these charges paid to other
persons for execution or other services.
(3) A description of the Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities’ brokerage placement practices,
if such practices have materially
changed during the period covered by
the summary.
(4) (i) A portfolio turnover ratio is
calculated in a manner which is
reasonably designed to provide the
authorizing plan fiduciary with the
information needed to assist in
discharging its duty of prudence. The
requirements of this paragraph (f)(4)(i)
will be met if the ‘‘annualized portfolio
turnover ratio’’, calculated in the
manner described in paragraph (f)(4)(ii),
is contained in the summary.
(ii) The ‘‘annualized portfolio
turnover ratio’’ shall be calculated as a
percentage of the plan assets consisting
of securities or cash over which the
authorized Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities had
discretionary investment authority, or
with respect to which such Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities rendered, or had any
responsibility to render, investment
advice (the portfolio) at any time or
times (management period(s)) during
the period covered by the report. First,
the ‘‘portfolio turnover ratio’’ (not
annualized) is obtained by dividing (A)
the lesser of the aggregate dollar
amounts of purchases or sales of
portfolio securities during the
management period(s) by (B) the
monthly average of the market value of
the portfolio securities during all
management period(s). Such monthly
average is calculated by totaling the
market values of the portfolio securities
as of the beginning and ending of each
management period and as of the end of
each month that ends within such
period(s), and dividing the sum by the
number of valuation dates so used. For
purposes of this calculation, all debt
securities whose maturities at the time
of acquisition were one year or less are
excluded from both the numerator and
the denominator.
The ‘‘annualized portfolio turnover
ratio’’ is then derived by multiplying the
‘‘portfolio turnover ratio’’ by an
annualizing factor. The annualizing
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26423
factor is obtained by dividing (C) the
number twelve by (D) the aggregate
duration of the management period(s)
expressed in months (and fractions
thereof).
(iii) The information described in this
paragraph (f)(4) is not required to be
furnished in any case where the
authorized Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities acting as plan
fiduciary has not exercised
discretionary authority over trading in
the plan’s account during the period
covered by the report.
For purposes of this paragraph (f), the
words ‘‘incurred by the plan’’ shall be
construed to mean ‘‘incurred by the
pooled fund’’ when such Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
engages in covered transactions on
behalf of a pooled fund in which the
plan participates.
(g) If an agency cross transaction to
which Section IV(b) of this exemption
does not apply is involved, the
following conditions must also be
satisfied:
(1) The information required under
Section III(d) or IV(d)(1)(B) of this
exemption includes a statement to the
effect that with respect to agency cross
transactions, the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
effecting or executing the transactions
will have a potentially conflicting
division of loyalties and responsibilities
regarding the parties to the transactions;
(2) The summary required under
Section III(f) of this exemption includes
a statement identifying the total number
of agency cross transactions during the
period covered by the summary and the
total amount of all commissions or other
remuneration received or to be received
from all sources by the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
engaging in the transactions in
connection with those transaction
during the period;
(3) The Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities effecting or
executing the agency cross transaction
has the discretionary authority to act on
behalf of, and/or provide investment
advice to, either (A) one or more sellers
or (B) one or more buyers with respect
to the transaction, but not both.
(4) The agency cross transaction is a
purchase or sale, for no consideration
other than cash payment against prompt
delivery of a security for which market
quotations are readily available; and
(5) The agency cross transaction is
executed or effected at a price that is at
or between the independent bid and
independent ask prices for the security
prevailing at the time of the transaction.
(h) A trustee (other than a
nondiscretionary trustee) may only
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26424
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
engage in a covered transaction with a
plan that has total net assets with a
value of at least $50 million and in the
case of a pooled fund, the $50 million
net asset requirement will be met if 50
percent or more of the units of
beneficial interest in such pooled fund
are held by plans each of which has
total net assets with a value of at least
$50 million.
For purposes of the net asset tests
described above, where a group of plans
is maintained by a single employer or
controlled group of employers, as
defined in section 407(d)(7) of the Act,
the $50 million net asset requirement
may be met by aggregating the assets of
such plans, if the assets are pooled for
investment purposes in a single master
trust.
(i) The trustee (other than a
nondiscretionary trustee) engaging in a
covered transaction furnishes, at least
annually, to the authorizing plan
fiduciary of each plan the following:
(1) The aggregate brokerage
commissions, expressed in dollars, paid
by the plan to brokerage firms affiliated
with the trustee;
(2) The aggregate brokerage
commissions, expressed in dollars, paid
by the plan to brokerage firms
unaffiliated with the trustee;
(3) The average brokerage
commissions, expressed as cents per
share, paid by the plan to brokerage
firms affiliated with the trustee; and
(4) The average brokerage
commissions, expressed as cents per
share, paid by the plan to brokerage
firms unaffiliated with the trustee.
For purposes of this paragraph (i), the
words ‘‘paid by the plan’’ should be
construed to mean ‘‘paid by the pooled
fund’’ when the trustee engages in
covered transactions on behalf of a
pooled fund in which the plan
participates.
Section IV: Exceptions From Conditions
(a) Certain plans not covering
employees. Section III of this exemption
does not apply to covered transactions
to the extent they are engaged in on
behalf of individual retirement accounts
meeting the conditions of 29 CFR
2510.3–2(d), or plans, other than
training programs, that cover no
employees within the meaning of 29
CFR 2510.3–3.
(b) Certain agency cross transactions.
Section III of this exemption does not
apply in the case of an agency cross
transaction, provided that the Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities effecting or executing the
transaction:
(1) Does not render investment advice
to any plan for a fee within the meaning
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
of section 3(21)(A)(ii) of the Act with
respect to the transaction;
(2) Is not otherwise a fiduciary who
has investment discretion with respect
to any plan assets involved in the
transaction, see 29 CFR 2510.3–21(d);
and
(3) Does not have the authority to
engage, retain or discharge any person
who is or is proposed to be a fiduciary
regarding any such plan assets.
(c) Recapture of profits. Section III(a)
of this exemption does not apply in any
case where the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities engaging in a
covered transaction returns or credits to
the plan all profits earned by that
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities in connection with the
securities transactions associated with
the covered transaction.
(d) Special rules for pooled funds. In
the case of a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities engaging in a
covered transaction on behalf of an
account or fund for the collective
investment of the assets of more than
one plan (pooled fund):
(1) Section III (b), (c), and (d) of this
exemption does not apply if—
(A) The arrangement under which the
covered transaction is performed is
subject to the prior and continuing
authorization, in the manner described
in this paragraph (d)(1), of an
authorizing plan fiduciary with respect
to each plan whose assets are invested
in the pooled fund that is independent
of the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities. The requirement that
the authorizing plan fiduciary be
independent of the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
shall not apply in the case of a plan
covering only employees of the Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities, if the requirements of Section
IV(d)(2)(A) and (B) of this exemption are
met.
(B) The authorizing plan fiduciary is
furnished with any reasonably available
information that the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
engaging or proposing to engage in the
covered transactions reasonably believes
to be necessary for the authorizing plan
fiduciary to determine whether the
authorization should be given or
continued, not less than 30 days prior
to implementation of the arrangement or
material change thereto, including (but
not limited to) a description of the
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities’ brokerage placement
practices, and, where requested, any
reasonable available information
regarding the matter upon the
reasonable request of the authorizing
plan fiduciary at any time.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(C) In the event an authorizing plan
fiduciary submits a notice in writing to
the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities engaging in or
proposing to engage in the covered
transaction objecting to the
implementation of, material change in,
or continuation of, the arrangement, the
plan on whose behalf the objection was
tendered is given the opportunity to
terminate its investment in the pooled
fund, without penalty to the plan,
within such time as may be necessary to
effect the withdrawal in an orderly
manner that is equitable to all
withdrawing plans and to the
nonwithdrawing plans. In the case of a
plan that elects to withdraw under this
subparagraph (d)(1)(C), the withdrawal
shall be effected prior to the
implementation of, or material change
in, the arrangement; but an existing
arrangement need not be discontinued
by reason of a plan electing to
withdraw.
(D) In the case of plans whose assets
are proposed to be invested in the
pooled fund subsequent to the
implementation of the arrangement that
has not authorized the arrangement in
the manner described in subparagraphs
(d)(1)(B) and (C) of this Section, the
plan’s investment in the pooled fund is
subject to the prior written
authorization of an authorizing plan
fiduciary who satisfies the requirements
of subparagraph (d)(1)(A).
(2) To the extent that Section III(a) of
this exemption prohibits any Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities from being the employer of
employees covered by a plan investing
in a pool managed by the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities,
Section III(a) of this exemption does not
apply if—
(A) The Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities is an
‘‘investment manager’’ as defined in
section 3(38) of the Act, and
(B) Either (i) the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
returns or credits to the pooled fund all
profits earned by the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities in
connection with all covered transactions
engaged in by the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities on
behalf of the fund, or (ii) the pooled
fund satisfies the requirements of
paragraph IV(d)(3).
(3) A pooled fund satisfies the
requirements of this paragraph for a
fiscal year of the fund if—
(A) On the first day of such fiscal
year, and immediately following each
acquisition of an interest in the pooled
fund during the fiscal year by any plan
covering employees of any Merrill
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities, the aggregate fair market value
of the interests in such fund of all plans
covering employees of any Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities does not exceed twenty percent
of the fair market value of the total
assets of the fund; and
(B) The aggregate brokerage
commissions received by any Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities, in connection with covered
transactions engaged in by any Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities on behalf of all pooled funds in
which a plan covering employees of any
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities participates, do not exceed
five percent of the total brokerage
commissions received by any Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities from all sources in such fiscal
year.
9. Exemption for Cross-Trades of
Securities by Index and Model-Driven
Funds
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Section I. Proposed Exemption for
Cross-Trading of Securities by Index
and/or Model-Driven Funds
The restrictions of sections
406(a)(1)(A) and 406(b)(2) of the Act,
and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) of the
Code, shall not apply to the transactions
described below if the applicable
conditions set forth in Sections II and III
of this exemption, below, are satisfied.
(a) The purchase and sale of securities
between an Index Fund or a ModelDriven Fund (either, a Fund; or
collectively, the Funds), as defined in
Section IV(a) and (b) of this exemption,
below, and another Fund, at least one of
which holds ‘‘plan assets’’ subject to the
Act; or
(b) The purchase and sale of securities
between a Fund and a Large Account, as
defined in Section IV(e) of this
exemption, below, at least one of which
holds ‘‘plan assets’’ subject to the Act,
pursuant to a portfolio restructuring
program, as defined in Section IV(f) of
this exemption, below, of the Large
Account;
Notwithstanding the foregoing, this
exemption shall apply to cross-trades
between two or more Large Accounts
pursuant to a portfolio restructuring
program if such cross-trades occur as
part of a single cross-trading program
involving both Funds and Large
Accounts for which securities are crosstraded solely as a result of the objective
operation of the program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
Section II. Specific Conditions
(a) The cross-trade is executed at the
closing price, as defined in Section
IV(h) of this exemption below.
(b) Any cross-trade of securities by a
Fund occurs as a direct result of a
‘‘triggering event,’’ as defined in Section
IV(d) of this exemption, and is executed
no later than the close of the third
business day following such ‘‘triggering
event.’’
(c) If the cross-trade involves a ModelDriven Fund, the cross-trade does not
take place within three (3) business days
following any change made by the
Manager to the model underlying the
Fund.
(d) The Manager has allocated the
opportunity for all Funds or Large
Accounts to engage in the cross-trade on
an objective basis which has been
previously disclosed to the authorizing
fiduciaries of plan investors, and which
does not permit the exercise of
discretion by the Manager (e.g., a pro
rata allocation system).
(e) No more than twenty (20) percent
of the assets of the Fund or Large
Account at the time of the cross-trade is
comprised of assets of employee benefit
plans maintained by the Manager for its
own employees (Manager Plans) for
which the Manager exercises investment
discretion.
(f)(1) Cross-trades of equity securities
involve only securities that are widelyheld, actively-traded, and for which
market quotations are readily available
from independent sources that are
engaged in the ordinary course of
business of providing financial news
and pricing information to institutional
investors and/or the general public, and
are widely recognized as accurate and
reliable sources for such information.
For purposes of this requirement, the
terms ‘‘widely-held’’ and ‘‘activelytraded’’ shall be deemed to include any
security listed in an Index, as defined in
Section IV(c) of this exemption; and
(2) Cross-trades of fixed-income
securities involve only securities for
which market quotations are readily
available from independent sources that
are engaged in the ordinary course of
business of providing financial news
and pricing information to institutional
investors and/or the general public, and
are widely recognized as accurate and
reliable sources for such information.
(g) The Manager receives no brokerage
fees or commissions as a result of the
cross-trade.
(h) As of the date this exemption is
granted, a plan’s participation in the
cross-trading program of a Manager, as
a result of investments made in any
Index or Model-Driven Fund that holds
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26425
plan assets is subject to a written
authorization executed in advance of
such investment by a fiduciary of the
plan which is independent of the
Manager engaging in the cross-trade
transactions. For purposes of this
exemption, the requirement that the
authorizing plan fiduciary be
independent of the Manager shall not
apply in the case of a Manager Plan.
(i) With respect to existing plan
investors in any Index or Model-Driven
Fund that holds plan assets as of the
date this exemption is granted, the
independent fiduciary is furnished with
a written notice, not less than forty-five
(45) days prior to the implementation of
the cross-trading program, that describes
the Fund’s participation in the crosstrading program of the Manager,
provided that:
(1) Such notice allows each plan an
opportunity to object to the plan’s
participation in the cross-trading
program as a Fund investor by
providing the plan with a special
termination form;
(2) The notice instructs the
independent plan fiduciary that failure
to return the termination form to the
Manager, by a specified date (which
shall be at least 30 days following the
plan’s receipt of the form) shall be
deemed to be an approval by the plan
of its participation in the Manager’s
cross-trading program as a Fund
investor; and
(3) If the independent plan fiduciary
objects to the plan’s participation in the
cross-trading program as a Fund
investor by returning the termination
form to the Manager by the specified
date, the plan is given the opportunity
to withdraw from each Index or ModelDriven Fund without penalty prior to
the implementation of the cross-trading
program, within such time as may be
reasonably necessary to effectuate the
withdrawal in an orderly manner.
(j) Prior to obtaining the authorization
described in Section II(h) of this
exemption, and in the notice described
in Section II(i) of this exemption, the
following statement must be provided
by the Manager to the independent plan
fiduciary:
Investment decisions for the Fund
(including decisions regarding which
securities to buy or sell, how much of
a security to buy or sell, and when to
execute a sale or purchase of securities
for the Fund) will not be based in whole
or in part by the Manager on the
availability of cross-trade opportunities
and will be made prior to the
identification and determination of any
cross-trade opportunities. In addition,
all cross-trades by a Fund will be based
solely upon a ‘‘triggering event’’ set
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
26426
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
forth in this exemption. Records
documenting each cross-trade
transaction will be retained by the
Manager.
(k) Prior to any authorization set forth
in Section II(h) of this exemption, and
at the time of any notice described in
Section II(i) of this exemption, the
independent plan fiduciary must be
furnished with any reasonably available
information necessary for the fiduciary
to determine whether the authorization
should be given, including (but not
limited to) a copy of this exemption, an
explanation of how the authorization
may be terminated, detailed disclosure
of the procedures to be implemented
under the Manager’s cross-trading
practices (including the ‘‘triggering
events’’ that will create the cross-trading
opportunities, the independent pricing
services that will be used by the
Manager to price the cross-traded
securities, and the methods that will be
used for determining closing price), and
any other reasonably available
information regarding the matter that
the authorizing plan fiduciary requests.
The independent plan fiduciary must
also be provided with a statement that
the Manager will have a potentially
conflicting division of loyalties and
responsibilities to the parties to any
cross-trade transaction and must explain
how the Manager’s cross-trading
practices and procedures will mitigate
such conflicts.
With respect to Funds that are added
to the Manager’s cross-trading program
or changes to, or additions of, triggering
events regarding Funds, following the
authorizations described in Section II(h)
or Section II(i) of this exemption, the
Manager shall provide a notice to each
relevant independent plan fiduciary of
each plan invested in the affected Funds
prior to, or within ten (10) days
following, such addition of Funds or
change to, or addition of, triggering
events, which contains a description of
such Fund(s) or triggering event(s). Such
notice will also include a statement that
the plan has the right to terminate its
participation in the cross-trading
program and its investment in any Index
Fund or Model-Driven Fund without
penalty at any time, as soon as is
necessary to effectuate the withdrawal
in an orderly manner.
(l) At least annually, the Manager
notifies the independent fiduciary for
each plan that has previously
authorized participation in the
Manager’s cross-trading program as a
Fund investor, that the plan has the
right to terminate its participation in the
cross-trading program and its
investment in any Index Fund or ModelDriven Fund that holds plan assets
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
without penalty at any time, as soon as
is necessary to effectuate the withdrawal
in an orderly manner. This notice shall
also provide each independent plan
fiduciary with a special termination
form and instruct the fiduciary that
failure to return the form to the Manager
by a specified date (which shall be at
least thirty (30) days following the
plan’s receipt of the form) shall be
deemed an approval of the subject
plan’s continued participation in the
cross-trading program as a Fund
investor. In lieu of providing a special
termination form, the notice may permit
the independent plan fiduciary to
utilize another written instrument by
the specified date to terminate the
plan’s participation in the cross-trading
program, provided that in such case the
notice explicitly discloses that a
termination form may be obtained from
the Manager upon request. Such annual
re-authorization must provide
information to the relevant independent
plan fiduciary regarding each Fund in
which the plan is invested, as well as
explicit notification that the plan
fiduciary may request and obtain
disclosures regarding any new Funds in
which the plan is not invested that are
added to the cross-trading program, or
any new triggering events (as defined in
Section IV(d) of this exemption) that
may have been added to any existing
Funds in which the plan is not invested,
since the time of the initial
authorization described in Section II(h)
of this exemption, or the time of the
notice described in Section II(i) of this
exemption.
(m) With respect to a cross-trade
involving a Large Account:
(1) The cross-trade is executed in
connection with a portfolio
restructuring program, as defined in
Section IV(f) of this exemption, with
respect to all or a portion of the Large
Account’s investments which an
independent fiduciary of the Large
Account (other than in the case of any
assets of a Manager Plan) has authorized
the Manager to carry out or to act as a
‘‘trading adviser,’’ as defined in Section
IV(g) of this exemption, in carrying out
a Large Account-initiated liquidation or
restructuring of its portfolio;
(2) Prior to the cross-trade, a fiduciary
of the Large Account who is
independent of the Manager (other than
in the case of any assets of a Manager
Plan) 4 has been fully informed of the
Manager’s cross-trading program, has
4 However, proper disclosures must be made to,
and written authorization must be made by, an
appropriate plan fiduciary for the Manager Plan in
order for the Manager Plan to participate in a
specific portfolio restructuring program as part of a
Large Account.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
been provided with the information
required in Section II(k) of this
exemption, and has provided the
Manager with advance written
authorization to engage in cross-trading
in connection with the restructuring,
provided that—
(A) Such authorization may be
terminated at will by the Large Account
upon receipt by the Manager of written
notice of termination.
(B) A form expressly providing an
election to terminate the authorization,
with instructions on the use of the form,
is supplied to the authorizing Large
Account fiduciary concurrent with the
receipt of the written information
describing the cross-trading program.
The instructions for such form must
specify that the authorization may be
terminated at will by the Large Account,
without penalty to the Large Account,
upon receipt by the Manager of written
notice from the authorizing Large
Account fiduciary;
(3) All cross-trades made in
connection with the portfolio
restructuring program must be
completed by the Manager within sixty
(60) days of the initial authorization (or
initial receipt of assets associated with
the restructuring, if later) to engage in
such restructuring by the Large
Account’s independent fiduciary, unless
such fiduciary agrees in writing to
extend this period for another thirty (30)
days; and,
(4) No later than thirty (30) days
following the completion of the Large
Account’s portfolio restructuring
program, the Large Account’s
independent fiduciary must be fully
apprised in writing of all cross-trades
executed in connection with the
restructuring. Such writing shall
include a notice that the Large
Account’s independent fiduciary may
obtain, upon request, the information
described in Section III(a) of this
exemption, subject to the limitations
described in Section III(b) of this
exemption. However, if the program
takes longer than sixty (60) days to
complete, interim reports containing the
transaction results must be provided to
the Large Account fiduciary no later
than fifteen (15) days following the end
of the initial sixty (60) day period and
the succeeding thirty (30) day period.
Section III. General Conditions
(a) The Manager maintains or causes
to be maintained for a period of six (6)
years from the date of each cross-trade
the records necessary to enable the
persons described in paragraph (b) of
this Section to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption have been
met, including records which identify:
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
(1) On a Fund by Fund basis, the
specific triggering events which result
in the creation of the model prescribed
output or trade list of specific securities
to be cross-traded;
(2) On a Fund by Fund basis, the
model prescribed output or trade list
which describes: (A) Which securities to
buy or sell; and (B) how much of each
security to buy or sell; in detail
sufficient to allow an independent plan
fiduciary to verify that each of the above
decisions for the Fund was made in
response to specific triggering events;
and
(3) On a Fund by Fund basis, the
actual trades executed by the Fund on
a particular day and which of those
trades resulted from triggering events.
Such records must be readily
available to assure accessibility and
maintained so that an independent
fiduciary, or other persons identified
below in paragraph (b) of this Part, may
obtain them within a reasonable period
of time. However, a prohibited
transaction will not be considered to
have occurred if, due to circumstances
beyond the control of the Manager, the
records are lost or destroyed prior to the
end of the six-year period, and no party
in interest other than the Manager shall
be subject to the civil penalty that may
be assessed under section 502(i) of the
Act or to the taxes imposed by sections
4975(a) and (b) of the Code if the
records are not maintained or are not
available for examination as required by
paragraph (b) below.
(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2) and notwithstanding any
provisions of sections 504(a)(2) and (b)
of the Act, the records referred to in
paragraph (a) of this Part are
unconditionally available at their
customary location for examination
during normal business hours by—
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department of
Labor or the Internal Revenue Service,
(B) Any fiduciary of a Plan
participating in a cross-trading program
who has the authority to acquire or
dispose of the assets of the Plan, or any
duly authorized employee or
representative of such fiduciary,
(C) Any contributing employer with
respect to any Plan participating in a
cross-trading program or any duly
authorized employee or representative
of such employer, and
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of
any Manager Plan participating in a
cross-trading program, or any duly
authorized employee or representative
of such participant or beneficiary.
(2) If, in the course of seeking to
inspect records maintained by a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
Manager pursuant to this Part, any
person described in paragraph (b)(1)(B)
through (D) seeks to examine trade
secrets, or commercial or financial
information of the Manager that is
privileged or confidential, and the
Manager is otherwise permitted by law
to withhold such information from such
person, the Manager may refuse to
disclose such information provided that,
by the close of the thirtieth (30th) day
following the request, the Manager gives
a written notice to such person advising
the person of the reasons for the refusal
and that the Department of Labor may
request such information.
(3) The information required to be
disclosed to persons described in
paragraph (b)(1)(B) through (D) shall be
limited to information that pertains to
cross-trades involving a Fund or Large
Account in which they have an interest.
Section IV. Definitions
The following definitions apply for
purposes of this exemption:
(a) ‘‘Index Fund’’—Any investment
fund, account, or portfolio sponsored,
maintained, trusteed, or managed by a
Manager or an Affiliate, in which one or
more investors invest, and—
(1) Which is designed to track the rate
of return, risk profile, and other
characteristics of an Index, as defined in
Section IV(c) of this exemption, by
either (i) replicating the same
combination of securities which
compose such Index or (ii) sampling the
securities which compose such Index
based on objective criteria and data;
(2) For which the Manager does not
use its discretion, or data within its
control, to affect the identity or amount
of securities to be purchased or sold;
(3) That either contains ‘‘plan assets’’
subject to the Act, is an investment
company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, or
contains assets of one or more
institutional investors, which may
include, but not be limited to, such
entities as an insurance company
separate account or general account, a
governmental plan, a university
endowment fund, a charitable
foundation fund, a trust or other fund
which is exempt from taxation under
section 501(a) of the Code; and,
(4) That involves no agreement,
arrangement, or understanding
regarding the design or operation of the
Index Fund which is intended to benefit
a Manager or an Affiliate, or any party
in which a Manager or an Affiliate may
have an interest.
(b) ‘‘Model-Driven Fund’’—Any
investment fund, account, or portfolio
sponsored, maintained, trusteed, or
managed by the Manager or an Affiliate
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26427
in which one or more investors invest,
and—
(1) Which is composed of securities
the identity of which and the amount of
which are selected by a computer model
that is based on prescribed objective
criteria using independent third party
data, not within the control of the
Manager, to transform an Index, as
defined in Section IV(c) of this
exemption;
(2) Which either contains ‘‘plan
assets’’ subject to the Act, is an
investment company registered under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, or
contains assets of one or more
institutional investors, which may
include, but not be limited to, such
entities as an insurance company
separate account or general account, a
governmental plan, a university
endowment fund, a charitable
foundation fund, a trust or other fund
which is exempt from taxation under
section 501(a) of the Code; and
(3) That involves no agreement,
arrangement, or understanding
regarding the design or operation of the
Model-Driven Fund or the utilization of
any specific objective criteria which is
intended to benefit a Manager or an
Affiliate, or any party in which a
Manager or an Affiliate may have an
interest.
(c) ‘‘Index’’—A securities index that
represents the investment performance
of a specific segment of the public
market for equity or debt securities in
the United States and/or foreign
countries, but only if—
(1) The organization creating and
maintaining the index is—
(A) Engaged in the business of
providing financial information,
evaluation, advice, or securities
brokerage services to institutional
clients,
(B) A publisher of financial news or
information, or
(C) A public securities exchange or
association of securities dealers; and,
(2) The index is created and
maintained by an organization
independent of the Manager, as defined
in Section IV(i) of this exemption; and,
(3) The index is a generally accepted
standardized index of securities which
is not specifically tailored for the use of
the Manager.
(d) ‘‘Triggering Event’’:
(1) A change in the composition or
weighting of the Index underlying a
Fund by the independent organization
creating and maintaining the Index;
(2) A material amount of net change
in the overall level of assets in a Fund,
as a result of investments in and
withdrawals from the Fund, provided
that:
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
26428
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
(A) Such material amount has either
been identified in advance as a specified
amount of net change relating to such
Fund and disclosed in writing as a
‘‘triggering event’’ to an independent
fiduciary of each plan having assets
held in the Fund prior to, or within ten
(10) days following, its inclusion as a
‘‘triggering event’’ for such Fund or the
Manager has otherwise disclosed in the
description of its cross-trading practices
pursuant to Section II(k) of this
exemption the parameters for
determining a material amount of net
change, including any amount of
discretion retained by the Manager that
may affect such net change, in sufficient
detail to allow the independent
fiduciary to determine whether the
authorization to engage in cross-trading
should be given; and
(B) Investments or withdrawals as a
result of the Manager’s discretion to
invest or withdraw assets of a Manager
Plan, other than a Manager Plan which
is a defined contribution plan under
which participants direct the
investment of their accounts among
various investment options, including
such Fund, will not be taken into
account in determining the specified
amount of net change;
(3) An accumulation in the Fund of a
material amount of either:
(A) Cash which is attributable to
interest or dividends on, and/or tender
offers for, portfolio securities; or
(B) Stock attributable to dividends on
portfolio securities; provided that such
material amount has either been
identified in advance as a specified
amount relating to such Fund and
disclosed in writing as a ‘‘triggering
event’’ to an independent fiduciary of
each plan having assets held in the
Fund prior to, or within ten (10) days
after, its inclusion as a ‘‘triggering
event’’ for such Fund, or the Manager
has otherwise disclosed in the
description of its cross-trading practices
pursuant to Section II(k) of this
exemption the parameters for
determining a material amount of
accumulated cash or securities,
including any amount of discretion
retained by the Manager that may affect
such accumulated amount, in sufficient
detail to allow the independent
fiduciary to determine whether the
authorization to engage in cross-trading
should be given;
(4) A change in the composition of the
portfolio of a Model-Driven Fund
mandated solely by operation of the
formulae contained in the computer
model underlying the Model-Driven
Fund where the basic factors for making
such changes (and any fixed frequency
for operating the computer model) have
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
been disclosed in writing to an
independent fiduciary of each plan
having assets held in the Model-Driven
Fund, prior to, or within ten (10) days
after, its inclusion as a ‘‘triggering
event’’ for such Model-Driven Fund; or
(5) A change in the composition or
weighting of a portfolio for an Index
Fund or a Model-Driven Fund which
results from an independent fiduciary’s
direction to exclude certain securities or
types of securities from the Fund,
notwithstanding that such securities are
part of the index used by the Fund.
(e) ‘‘Large Account’’—Any investment
fund, account, or portfolio that is not an
Index Fund or a Model-Driven Fund
sponsored, maintained, trusteed (other
than a Fund for which the Manager is
a nondiscretionary trustee) or managed
by the Manager, which holds assets of
either:
(1) An employee benefit plan within
the meaning of section 3(3) of the Act
that has $50 million or more in total
assets (for purposes of this requirement,
the assets of one or more employee
benefit plans maintained by the same
employer, or controlled group of
employers, may be aggregated provided
that such assets are pooled for
investment purposes in a single master
trust);
(2) An institutional investor that has
total assets in excess of $50 million,
such as an insurance company separate
account or general account, a
governmental plan, a university
endowment fund, a charitable
foundation fund, a trust or other fund
which is exempt from taxation under
section 501(a) of the Code; or
(3) An investment company registered
under the Investment Company Act of
1940 (e.g., a mutual fund) other than an
investment company advised or
sponsored by the Manager; provided
that the Manager has been authorized to
restructure all or a portion of the
portfolio for such Large Account or to
act as a ‘‘trading adviser’’ (as defined in
Section IV(g) of this exemption) in
connection with a portfolio
restructuring program (as defined in
Section IV(f) of this exemption) for the
Large Account.
(f) ‘‘Portfolio restructuring
program’’—Buying and selling the
securities on behalf of a Large Account
in order to produce a portfolio of
securities which will be an Index Fund
or a Model-Driven Fund managed by the
Manager or by another investment
manager, or in order to produce a
portfolio of securities the composition
of which is designated by a party
independent of the Manager, without
regard to the requirements of Section
IV(a)(3) or (b)(2) of this exemption, or to
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
carry out a liquidation of a specified
portfolio of securities for the Large
Account.
(g) ‘‘Trading adviser’’—A Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities whose role is limited with
respect to a Large Account to the
disposition of a securities portfolio in
connection with a portfolio
restructuring program that is a Large
Account-initiated liquidation or
restructuring within a stated period of
time in order to minimize transaction
costs. The Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities does not have
discretionary authority or control with
respect to any underlying asset
allocation, restructuring or liquidation
decisions for the account in connection
with such transactions and does not
render investment advice [within the
meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3–21(c)] with
respect to such transactions.
(h) ‘‘Closing price’’—The price for a
security on the date of the transaction,
as determined by objective procedures
disclosed to investors in advance and
consistently applied with respect to
securities traded in the same market,
which procedures shall indicate the
independent pricing source (and
alternates, if the designated pricing
source is unavailable) used to establish
the closing price and the time frame
after the close of the market in which
the closing price will be determined.
(i) ‘‘Manager’’—A Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity which is:
(1) A bank or trust company, or any
Affiliate thereof, which is supervised by
a state or federal agency; or
(2) An investment adviser or any
Affiliate thereof which is registered
under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940.
(j) ‘‘Affiliate’’—An affiliate of a
Manager includes:
(1) Any person, directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries,
controlling, controlled by or under
common control with the Manager:
(2) Any officer, director, employee or
relative of such Manager, or partner of
any such Manager; and
(3) Any corporation or partnership of
which such Manager is an officer,
director, partner or employee.
(k) ‘‘Control’’—The power to exercise
a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a person
other than an individual.
(l) ‘‘Relative’’—A relative is a person
that is defined in section 3(15) of the
Act (or a ‘‘member of the family’’ as that
term is defined in section 4975(e)(6) of
the Code), or a brother, a sister, or a
spouse of a brother or sister.
(m) ‘‘Nondiscretionary trustee’’—A
plan trustee whose powers and duties
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
with respect to any assets of the plan are
limited to (1) the provision of
nondiscretionary trust services to the
plan, and (2) duties imposed on the
trustee by any provision or provisions of
the Act or the Code. The term
‘‘nondiscretionary trust services’’ means
custodial services and services ancillary
to custodial services, none of which
services are discretionary. For purposes
of this exemption, a person who is
otherwise a nondiscretionary trustee
will not fail to be a nondiscretionary
trustee solely by reason of having been
delegated, by the sponsor of a master or
prototype plan, the power to amend
such plan.
Background
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
On September 29, 2006, ML&Co. and
BlackRock consummated a transaction
(the Merger), in which ML&Co.
contributed Merrill Lynch Investment
Managers, LLC (MLIM) and various
other assets and subsidiaries that
comprised its investment management
business to BlackRock in exchange for
approximately 45% of the outstanding
voting securities of BlackRock. Prior to
the Merger, ML&Co. and its affiliates
engaged in various types of transactions,
involving employee benefit plans, in
reliance on, and in accordance with the
conditions of various class exemptions
(the Applicable Exemptions) 5 issued by
the Department. Also, prior to the
Merger, affiliates of ML&Co. engaged in
the same transactions as described in
the Applicable Exemptions, involving
plans, with affiliates of BlackRock for
which no exemption was required
because ML&Co. had, at most, a de
minimis ownership interest in
BlackRock.
As a result of the Merger, certain
transactions involving companies
affiliated with ML&Co. and companies
affiliated with BlackRock may now be
prohibited transactions as defined in
section 406 of the Act. However, the
ownership interest existing between
ML&Co. and its affiliates and BlackRock
and its affiliates may nevertheless not
result in the various entities being
considered ‘‘affiliates’’ of each other as
defined in the Applicable Exemptions.
As the Applicable Exemptions extend
relief only to affiliated entities, as
defined thereunder, ML&Co. and its
affiliates, and BlackRock and its
affiliates may not be able to take
5 Parts III and IV of PTE 75–1 (40 FR 50845,
October 31, 1975); PTE 77–3 (42 FR 18734, April
8, 1977); PTE 77–4 (42 FR 18732, April 8, 1977);
PTE 79–13 (44 FR 25533, May 1, 1979); PTE 86–
128 (51 FR 41686, November 18, 1986; as amended
by 67 FR 64137, October 17, 2002); and PTE 2002–
12 (67 FR 9483, March 1, 2002).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
advantage of the relief provided by the
Applicable Exemptions.
Accordingly, the Department is
proposing an individual exemption
which will enable the Applicants to
engage in the transactions described in
the Applicable Exemptions, provided
the conditions contained herein are met.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. BlackRock, headquartered in New
York, NY, is one of the largest publiclytraded investment management firms in
the world. BlackRock, through its
Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC)-registered investment advisor
subsidiaries, currently manages assets
for institutional and individual
investors worldwide through a variety
of equity, fixed income, cash
management and alternative investment
products. As of June 30, 2007,
BlackRock had approximately $1.2
trillion in assets under management.
2. ML&Co. is a holding company that,
through its subsidiaries, provides
broker-dealer, investment banking,
financing, wealth management,
advisory, insurance, lending and related
products and services on a global basis.
ML&Co. is subject to group-wide
supervision by the SEC.
3. On September 29, 2006, ML&Co.
combined its asset management
business with BlackRock (i.e., the
Merger). Prior to the Merger, PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC)
owned approximately 70.6% of
BlackRock. As a result of the Merger,
ML&Co. now owns a 50.3% economic
interest and an approximate 45% voting
interest in BlackRock, and PNC’s
ownership interest has been reduced to
approximately 34% of BlackRock. The
remaining interest in BlackRock is
owned by the public and by BlackRock
employees.
4. All BlackRock capital stock
beneficially owned from time to time by
ML&Co. and its related companies
(other than in certain fiduciary
capacities and customer or marketmaking accounts) is subject to the terms
and provisions of a Stockholders’
Agreement as amended by Amendment
No. 1 thereto (the Stockholders’
Agreement), which was entered into on
February 15, 2006.
5. The Stockholders’ Agreement will
remain in effect until ML&Co.
beneficially owns less than 20% of
BlackRock’s voting stock or until five
years after the closing date of the Merger
(Closing Date), whichever comes later,
except that the transfer restrictions will
continue to apply until ML&Co.
beneficially owns less than 5% of such
voting stock. Additionally, the
restrictions, obligations and
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26429
prohibitions on ML&Co. ownership of
BlackRock securities may not be
modified, amended or waived unless
approved by either all of the
independent directors of BlackRock or
at least two-thirds of the directors of
BlackRock. These restrictions,
obligations and prohibitions fall into
four broad categories: Corporate
governance, share ownership, transfer
restrictions, and non-competition.
6. ML&Co.’s rights to vote the shares
of BlackRock voting stock, communicate
with other BlackRock stockholders and
to otherwise express its interests are
expressly limited in the Stockholders’
Agreement as follows: (i) ML&Co. may
designate only two directors, each in a
separate class, to the 17-member Board
of Directors of BlackRock (the Board)
and, of the 17-member Board, seven
directors were members of the Board
prior to the Merger and were
independent of BlackRock, ML&Co. and
PNC, for purposes of NYSE Listed
Company Manual Section 303A.02 and
Section 10A of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and were not proposed by
ML&Co. or PNC; two additional
directors were determined by
BlackRock’s pre-Merger board and
satisfy the foregoing independence
standard; four directors are members of
management (including three from
BlackRock and one from pre-Merger
MLIM); two directors, as noted, are
designated by ML&Co. and two directors
are designated by PNC, thereby resulting
in a Board with a majority of directors
who are independent of management,
ML&Co. and PNC, less than 12% of
whom are designated by ML&Co. or
PNC and nearly 25% of whom are
members of BlackRock management; (ii)
All committees of the Board (other than
its executive committee) must consist
solely of independent directors; (iii)
ML&Co. must ensure that all of its
BlackRock voting stock is present at any
stockholder meeting, either in person or
by proxy, for purposes of establishing a
quorum; (iv) ML&Co. must vote all of its
BlackRock voting stock on all matters
(including elections of directors) as
recommended by the Board as long as
consistent with the terms of the
Stockholders’ Agreement; (v) ML&Co.
has agreed that neither it nor its
affiliated companies nor any of their
directors, officers or agents will seek,
solicit or make any statement to
BlackRock or its affiliated companies or
their boards or managements, any
stockholder of BlackRock or any other
person regarding any proposal seeking
(1) to control or influence the
management, the Board or the policies
of BlackRock or its affiliated companies,
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
26430
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
(2) any acquisition of BlackRock stock
in excess of its permitted holdings, (3)
any acquisition of any securities, assets
or business of BlackRock or its affiliated
companies, or (4) any recapitalization,
business combination or other
extraordinary transaction involving
BlackRock or its affiliated companies;
(vi) Certain limited matters designated
in the Stockholders’ Agreement require
approval by two-thirds of the
independent directors of BlackRock
(including appointment of a new CEO of
BlackRock, sale of BlackRock, major
acquisitions and charter amendments),
and certain other extraordinary matters
require consent from ML&Co. (the ML
Consent Rights) (such as sale of
BlackRock to a major global competitor
of ML&Co., sale of BlackRock within the
first five years of the Closing Date, sale
in any one year of BlackRock
subsidiaries that produce more than
20% of BlackRock’s revenue, changes to
certain of BlackRock’s by-laws which
would adversely affect ML&Co.’s
interests, settlement of regulatory
matters that would result in a loss of
license by ML&Co., voluntary
bankruptcy, actions that would cause
ML&Co. to become a bank holding
company or amendment of the parallel
arrangements with PNC in a manner
materially averse to ML&Co. or
materially beneficial to PNC); and (vii)
The first three of the ML Consent Rights
terminate if there is a change in control
of ML&Co., and if such change occurs
during the first five years after the
Merger, ML&Co. must also reduce its
holdings below 25% or exchange all of
its shares for nonvoting participating
preferred stock.
7. Among the restrictions that ML&Co.
has agreed to in the Stockholders’
Agreement, there are two fundamental
restrictions with respect to its
ownership of BlackRock capital stock:
(i) ML&Co. and its related companies
may not seek to acquire or acquire
beneficial ownership of any BlackRock
capital stock or equivalent securities if,
after giving effect to any such
acquisition, ML&Co. and its related
companies would beneficially own in
excess of 49.8% of the total voting
power of all outstanding BlackRock
voting securities, or BlackRock voting
securities and preferred stock in excess
of 49.8% of the outstanding BlackRock
voting securities and preferred stock
combined on a fully diluted basis; and
(ii) ML&Co. must sell stock as necessary
to keep its holdings below such levels.
8. In light of the difficulty ML&Co.
may experience in acquiring additional
BlackRock capital stock if BlackRock
issues additional voting securities
beyond certain levels, ML&Co. will have
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
the right to purchase additional
preferred stock to maintain its then
current economic ownership level and
to purchase additional voting securities
if necessary to prevent dilution below
90% of its voting securities limitation.
9. ML&Co. is prohibited by the terms
of the Stockholders’ Agreement from
transferring any of its BlackRock capital
stock to any person who would as a
result beneficially own more than 5% of
BlackRock’s voting stock. ML&Co. is
also restricted in the following ways: (i)
ML&Co. may sell its BlackRock capital
stock only in broadly distributed public
offerings, or in ordinary unsolicited
broker transactions to persons who will
not beneficially own more than 5% of
BlackRock’s voting stock after such sale
(after providing BlackRock with a right
to match any offer), or to one of its
related companies which agrees in
writing with BlackRock to be bound by
the Stockholders’ Agreement as if it
were an initial signatory thereto; (ii)
ML&Co. must obtain prior written
consent to engage in any transfers not
provided for in (i) above; and (iii) If
ML&Co. wishes to or is required to
transfer an amount of BlackRock voting
stock constituting more than 10% of the
total voting power, ML&Co. must
coordinate such transfer with
BlackRock.
10. The Stockholders’ Agreement
substantially curtails ML&Co.’s ability
to compete with BlackRock in the asset
management business as well as
BlackRock’s ability to compete with
ML&Co. in the retail securities
brokerage business.
11. The transactions described in this
proposed exemption are the same as the
transactions described in PTEs 75–1,
Parts III and IV; PTE 77–3; PTE 77–4;
PTE 79–13; PTE 86–128; and PTE 2002–
12 (i.e., the Applicable Exemptions),
and the conditions would be the same
conditions provided for in the
Applicable Exemptions. However, the
Applicable Exemptions contain
definitions of the term ‘‘affiliate’’ which
might not apply to all of the entities
related to ML&Co. and to BlackRock
after the Merger. Accordingly, the
Applicants have sought the individual
exemption proposed herein in order that
such entities may continue to engage in
the transactions described in the
Applicable Exemptions.
12. The Applicants have also
requested relief for their related entities
which may satisfy this individual
exemption in the future. For a variety of
business reasons, the Applicants may
reorganize their respective businesses or
establish new entities that will perform
the same or similar functions as existing
entities. Further, the Applicants may
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
acquire entities that act as investment
advisers or other service providers to
plans or may otherwise be considered
parties in interest to plans by virtue of
their relationship to the Applicants.
However, the Applicants are not
requesting relief, nor is the Department
herein proposing any relief, for an entity
that would be a successor of ML&Co. or
of BlackRock.
13. The Applicants had discussions
concerning the possible ramifications of
the Merger with respect to the
Applicable Exemptions with the
Department both prior to and
continuing after the date of the Merger.
The Applicants are requesting relief
retroactive to September 29, 2006, the
date of the Merger, to the extent that
they and their related entities have been
engaging in transactions described in
the Applicable Exemptions in
accordance with the conditions therein
(other than the definition of ‘‘affiliate’’).
14. The Applicants represent that
transactions covered by the proposed
individual exemption have been
engaged in in accordance with the
conditions of the Applicable
Exemptions following consummation of
the Merger. However, with regard to
Section VIII of the proposed individual
exemption pertaining to PTE 86–128, it
should be noted that prior to the
effective date of the merger, MLIM, as a
subsidiary of ML&Co., engaged in
transactions in reliance on, and in
accordance with, the conditions of PTE
86–128. In this regard, it is represented
that certain independent plan
fiduciaries authorized MLIM to utilize
the relief provided by PTE 86–128 with
respect to transactions involving any
broker-dealer that is affiliated with
ML&Co. As a result of the Merger, MLIM
became a subsidiary of BlackRock and it
is represented that MLIM continued to
engage in those same transactions for
which relief is provided by PTE 86–128.
The Applicants maintain that reliance
on the existing consents obtained from
certain independent plan fiduciaries
was appropriate, because MLIM,
notwithstanding the fact that it had
become a subsidiary of BlackRock, was
continuing an existing practice for
which it had already obtained
affirmative consent in accordance with
the requirements of PTE 86–128.
Accordingly, instead of seeking new
authorization, BlackRock sent a letter to
the authorizing plan fiduciary of each
client plan and pooled fund subject to
the Act or the Code after the closing of
the Merger notifying such fiduciaries of
the Merger and that the authorization
remained in place, unless such
fiduciaries elected to terminate such
authorization. It is represented that in
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
the case of plans covered by the Act, a
termination form was included with
such letter. The Applicants maintain
that provision of notice of the Merger
and the right to terminate an
authorization was consistent with the
annual ‘‘negative consent’’ provided for
in Part III(c) of PTE 86–128. With
respect to existing client plans of
BlackRock and any of its affiliates, on
the effective date of the Merger, and
client plans that retained BlackRock or
any of its affiliates following the
effective date of the Merger, it is
represented that BlackRock has
implemented a compliance program
designed to comply with the
requirements of PTE 86–128. In this
regard, for BlackRock and any of its
affiliates that had not been relying on
PTE 86–128 prior to the consummation
of the Merger, affirmative consents have
been and will be obtained.
15. In summary, the Applicants
represent that the subject transactions
meet the statutory criteria for an
exemption under section 408(a) of the
Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code
because: (a) The transactions covered by
the proposed exemption are the same as
the transactions described in the
Applicable Exemptions; (b) The
conditions contained in the proposed
exemption are the same as those in the
Applicable Exemptions (except for the
definition of ‘‘affiliate’’ therein); (c) The
rationale for providing the same
exemptive relief as is available under
the Applicable Exemptions is the same
as providing the proposed exemptive
relief described herein; and (d) Absent
the requested relief, plan participants
and beneficiaries would be precluded
from gaining access to certain favorable
investment opportunities or receiving
certain services from the Applicants and
their related entities.
Temporary Nature of Exemption
The Department has determined that
the relief provided by this exemption is
temporary in nature. The exemption, if
granted, will be effective September 29,
2006, and will expire on the day which
is five (5) years from the date of the
publication of the final exemption in the
Federal Register. Accordingly, the relief
provided by this exemption will not be
available upon the expiration of such
five year period for any new or
additional transactions, as described
herein, after such date, but would
continue to apply beyond the expiration
of such five year period for continuing
transactions entered into during the
effective dates of this exemption;
provided the conditions of this
exemption continue to be satisfied.
Should the Applicants wish to extend,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
beyond the expiration of such five year
period, the relief provided by this
exemption to new or additional
transactions, the Applicants may submit
another application for exemption. In
this regard, the Department would
require that prior to filing another
exemption application seeking relief for
new or additional transactions, the
Applicants must document compliance
with the conditions of this exemption.
Notice to Interested Persons
The Applicants represent that because
those plans proposing to engage in the
covered transactions cannot all be
identified, the only practical means of
notifying independent plan fiduciaries
or plan participants of such affected
plans is by publication of the proposed
exemption in the Federal Register.
Therefore, any comments from
interested persons must be received by
the Department no later than June 9,
2008.
Written Comments and Hearing
Requests
All interested persons are invited to
submit written comments and/or
requests for a public hearing on the
pending exemption to the address, as set
forth above, within the time frame, as
set forth above. All comments and
requests for a public hearing will be
made a part of the record. Comments
and hearing requests should state the
reasons for the writer’s interest in the
proposed exemption. A request for a
public hearing must also state the issues
to be addressed and include a general
description of the evidence to be
presented at the hearing. Comments and
hearing requests received will also be
available for public inspection with the
referenced application at the address, as
set forth above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Blessed Chuksorji, Office of Exemption
Determinations, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, telephone (202)
693–8540. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26431
of the Act, which, among other things,
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be
granted under section 408(a) of the Act
and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code,
the Department must find that the
exemption is administratively feasible,
in the interests of the plan and of its
participants and beneficiaries, and
protective of the rights of participants
and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemption, if
granted, will be supplemental to, and
not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transitional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(4) The proposed exemption, if
granted, will be subject to the express
condition that the material facts and
representations contained in each
application are true and complete, and
that each application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of
April, 2008.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E8–10263 Filed 5–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2008–0005]
Request for Comments on Proposed
Guidance on Workplace Stockpiling of
Respirators and Facemasks for
Pandemic Influenza
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor is
inviting comments on its document
entitled ‘‘Proposed Guidance on
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 91 (Friday, May 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26415-26431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10263]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
[Application Nos. D-11363 & D-11435]
Proposed Exemptions Involving: D-11363--Citation Box and Paper
Co. Profit Sharing Plan and Retirement Trust; and D-11435--Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc. and BlackRock, Inc.
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains a notice of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of proposed exemptions from
certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
Written Comments and Hearing Requests
All interested persons are invited to submit written comments or
requests for a hearing on the pending exemption, unless otherwise
stated in the Notice of Proposed Exemption, within 45 days from the
date of publication of this Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1) The name, address, and
telephone number of the person making the comment or request, and (2)
the nature of the person's interest in the exemption and the manner in
which the person would be adversely affected by the exemption. A
request for a hearing must also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the evidence to be presented at the
hearing.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and requests for a hearing (at least
three
[[Page 26416]]
copies) should be sent to the Employee Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), Office of Exemption Determinations, Room N-5649, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210. Attention: Application No. ----, stated in each Notice of
Proposed Exemption. Interested persons are also invited to submit
comments and/or hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or FAX. Any such
comments or requests should be sent either by e-mail to:
moffitt.betty@dol.gov, or by FAX to (202) 219-0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The application for exemption and the
comments received will be available for public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N-1513, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemption will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication in the Federal Register. Such
notice shall include a copy of the notice of proposed exemption as
published in the Federal Register and shall inform interested persons
of their right to comment and to request a hearing (where appropriate).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed exemption was requested in
applications filed pursuant to section 408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4
of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred the authority of the
Secretary of the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type requested to
the Secretary of Labor. Therefore, this notice of proposed exemption is
issued solely by the Department.
The application contains representations with regard to the
proposed exemption which is summarized below. Interested persons are
referred to the application on file with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and representations.
Citation Box and Paper Co. Profit Sharing Plan and Retirement Trust
(the Plan), Located in Chicago, Illinois
[Exemption Application Number: D-11363].
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570 Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). If the exemption
is granted, the restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A) and (D), and
sections 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act, and the sanctions resulting
from the application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of sections
4975(c)(1)(A), (D), and (E) of the Code, shall not apply to the
proposed sale of improved real property (the Property) by the Plan to a
partnership to be comprised of Anthony J. Kostiuk (the Applicant and
Plan Fiduciary), Anthony L. Kostiuk, Edmund Chmiel, Andre Frydl, and
David Marinier, each of whom is a party in interest with respect to the
Plan, provided that the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) The sale is a one-time transaction for cash;
(b) As a result of the sale, the Plan receives the greater of: (i)
$975,000; (ii) The fair market value of the Property as of the date of
the transaction as determined by a qualified, independent appraiser; or
(iii) The cost to the Plan to acquire and hold the Property;
(c) The Plan pays no commissions, fees or other expenses in
connection with the sale;
(d) The terms and conditions of the sale are at least as favorable
as those obtainable in an arm's length transaction with an unrelated
third party;
(e) With respect to any lease payments for the occupancy of the
Property that were made by the Citation Box and Paper Co. (the Company)
to the Plan on or after July 1, 1996 and which (in the opinion of an
MAI-certified, qualified independent appraiser) amounted to less than
the fair market rental value of the Property at the time of such
payment, the Company reimburses the Plan, prior to publication of a
final grant of this requested prohibited transaction exemption, for the
full amount of all such rental shortfalls in the form of a lump sum
payment in arrears plus interest as calculated in conformity with the
requirements of section 5(b)(5) of the Department's Voluntary Fiduciary
Correction (VFC) Program described at 71 FR 20262 (April 19, 2006); and
(f) To the extent that there are rental shortfalls referenced in
paragraph (e), the Applicant shall provide the Department with all
relevant documentation pertaining to the calculation of such shortfall
(including the fair market rental value of the Property for each
applicable lease year, the amount of the rental shortfall for each
year, the interest attributable to the rental shortfall for each year,
and proof that the reimbursement was paid to the Plan) prior to
publication of a final grant of this requested prohibited transaction
exemption.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. The Plan is a defined contribution profit sharing plan sponsored
by the Citation Box and Paper Co. (the Company), which is headquartered
in Chicago, Illinois. As of June 30, 2006, the Plan had approximately
34 participants and total assets of approximately $3,107,545. The
Plan's current and sole trustee is the Applicant, who is also a
participant in the Plan and the owner of the Company. Anthony L.
Kostiuk, Edmund Chmiel, Andre Frydl, and David Marinier are also
participants in the Plan and, together with the Applicant, intend to
establish a partnership that will purchase a parcel of improved real
property (the Property), located at 4700 West Augusta Boulevard in
Chicago, Illinois, from the Plan. The Applicant states that, in
submitting this exemption application to the Department, he is
authorized to represent the interests of his intended co-partners
(Messrs. A. L. Kostiuk, Chmiel, Frydl, and Marinier) in the acquisition
of the Property from the Plan.
2. The Applicant represents that the Property covers a gross area
of 76,444 square feet, and is irregular in shape. The Applicant
represents that the Property was acquired by the Plan from the Company
on November 18, 1971 at a cost of $294,000.\1\ The Property contains a
two-story loft industrial structure (the Building) that houses the
Company's warehouse and office facilities. The Applicant represents
that the surface area of the Building at ground level totals 41,821
square feet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Applicant has provided a copy of the 1984 exemption
application (the 1984 Application) submitted on behalf of the Plan
which culminated in the grant of PTE 85-7. The 1984 Application
states that the Property was originally purchased by the Plan in
1971 for a price of $294,000. According to the Applicant, the 1984
Notice of Proposed Exemption (49 FR 43131, October 26, 1984)
contains a typographical error, because it states that the Property
was acquired by the Plan for $249,000. In addition, the Notice of
Proposed Exemption states that the Property is approximately 76,000
square feet in area; In the current application, as noted above, the
Applicant represents that the more precise figure is 76,444 square
feet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Applicant represents that a parcel of land adjacent to the
Property (the Adjacent Parcel) previously owned by the Belt Railway
Company (the Railway) of Chicago was purchased in 2005 by
[[Page 26417]]
Citation Properties, LLC, a single-member limited liability company
whose sole member is the Applicant. Prior to its acquisition by the
Company, the Applicant represents that Adjacent Parcel had been leased
to the Company by the Railway to provide parking facilities, as well as
access to and egress from the Property. The Applicant represents that
this lease predated the Department's issuance of a previous
administrative exemption, PTE 85-7 (50 FR 1006, January 8, 1985),
involving the Plan and the Property at issue in this proposal. The
Applicant represents that the Adjacent Parcel is rectangular in shape
and covers an area of 17,600 square feet. The Applicant represents that
the Plan has not paid the Company or Citation Properties, LLC for the
use of the Adjacent Parcel since it was acquired from the Railway. The
Applicant also represents that the remaining lots adjacent to the
Property are owned by persons unrelated to the Company, the Applicant,
and the intended co-partners.
3. PTE 85-7 (the Original Exemption) permitted the Plan to lease
the Property to the Company on a continuous basis on or after July 1,
1984, provided that ``the terms and conditions of such leasing are at
least as favorable to the Plan as those which the Plan could receive in
a similar transaction with an unrelated party.'' The material facts and
representations supporting the Department's grant of the Original
Exemption were contained in a Notice of Proposed Exemption published on
October 26, 1984, at 49 FR 43131 (the 1984 Notice).
4. Since it acquired the Property in 1971, the Plan has leased the
Property to the Company on a continuous basis. Each of the successive
lease agreements executed between the Plan and the Company since the
time of the acquisition have been ``absolute net leases'' requiring the
company to be responsible for all upkeep, repair, fire insurance
premiums, and taxes on the Property. According to the Summary of Facts
and Representations contained in the 1984 Notice published prior to the
issuance of PTE 85-7, the Original Exemption was intended to permit the
continued leasing (the Lease) of the Property by the Plan to the
Company until June 30, 1994, with three five-year options from such
date.
The 1984 Notice further stated that ``[t]he Lease provides that for
each three-year period during the initial ten-year term and during each
option period thereafter the rental amount would be adjusted based upon
an MAI appraisal report as to the then-current fair rental value.'' The
terms of the original Lease executed on January 16, 1984, stipulated
that the fair rental value of the Property would be updated two months
prior to July 1, 1987 (and triennially thereafter through the year
2008), by an independent, MAI-certified appraiser.
5. According to the 1984 Notice, an independent fiduciary
(originally Unibanc Trust Company, subsequently replaced in March of
1986 by Harris Trust and Savings Bank (Harris Trust)) was to exercise
authority and control over and have responsibility for the operation of
the lease. In addition, the 1984 Notice represented that this fiduciary
was to have sole discretion to monitor the lease and enforce the rights
of the Plan under the terms and conditions of any such lease.\2\ In
April of 2004, the Company informed Harris Trust that it was exercising
its option under the lease agreement to extend the term of the lease
for an additional period of five years beginning on July 1, 2004, and
ending on June 30, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Department expresses no opinion herein as to whether the
Plan's continued ownership and leasing of the Property is consistent
with the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of Part 4 of
Title I of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Applicant represents that Harris Trust notified the Company in
April of 2004 that it would no longer serve as an independent fiduciary
to the Plan after May 31, 2004, because it was no longer providing
retirement plan services to its clients. This line of business was sold
by Harris Trust to another financial institution, Wells Fargo
Investment and Trust Company (Wells Fargo). Upon receiving notification
of Harris Trust's withdrawal, the Plan Fiduciary contacted Wells Fargo
to inquire about its willingness to serve as a replacement independent
fiduciary with respect to the monitoring of the Lease described in the
Original Exemption. While it did assume various retirement plan
services for the Plan previously performed by Harris Trust, Wells Fargo
declined the Plan Fiduciary's request to serve as an independent
fiduciary with respect to the Lease. The Applicant represents that the
Plan Fiduciary then approached two other financial institutions to
serve as a replacement independent fiduciary. However, neither of these
institutions expressed a willingness to serve the Plan in such a
capacity.
6. As part of its current exemption application with the
Department, the Plan Fiduciary submitted copies of a series of fair
market rental appraisals of the Property for several prior lease terms.
The applicant represents that each of these prior appraisals was
prepared by a qualified, independent appraiser, Urban Real Estate
Research, Inc. (Urban Real Estate) of Chicago, Illinois, and signed by
Mr. Arthur J. Murphy, MAI, a certified general real estate appraiser
licensed by the State of Illinois. In each of these appraisal reports,
Urban Real Estate reported that the Property covered an approximate
area of 72,844 square feet. In providing this approximate square
footage figure (which is less than the 76,444 square foot area
represented by the Applicant as the accurate size of the Property), the
Applicant represents that Urban Real Estate used the measurement from
the Realty Atlas Map. The Applicant also represents that the Realty
Atlas Map is almost illegible, and appeared to indicate that the
Property occupied approximately 241.31 feet of frontage along the north
side of West Augusta Boulevard. The Applicant further represents,
however, that a plat of survey conducted by the National Survey
Service, Inc. shows that the actual frontage is actually 291.31 feet, a
50-foot difference. The Applicant also acknowledges that, since at
least July 1, 2006 (i.e., during the pendency of the current prohibited
transaction exemption request), the annual rent paid by the Company to
the Plan for the Property has been less than the fair rental value of
the Property as determined by Urban Real Estate.
7. The Applicant further represents that a second real estate
appraiser, Muriello Appraisal and Consulting (Muriello Appraisal) of
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, was retained by the Plan for the purpose
of determining the fair market value of the Property in connection with
the sale. The Applicant represents that Muriello Appraisal is
independent of, and unrelated to, the Company, the Applicant, and the
intended co partners. Muriello Appraisal represents that less than 1%
of its gross annual revenue was derived from appraisal services
performed for the Plan and the Company.
On June 18, 2007, an updated appraisal report was issued by
Muriello Appraisal concerning the fair market value of the Property as
of June 11, 2007. The updated report was signed by Frank J. Muriello,
MAI (a general real estate appraiser licensed by the State of Illinois)
and Paul J. Muriello, a senior appraiser also licensed by the State of
Illinois. In this updated report, Muriello Appraisal states that
consideration was given in the appraisal to three approaches to value:
The cost approach, the sales comparison approach, and the income
capitalization approach. Relying upon the sales comparison approach,
Muriello Appraisal issued a report dated June 18, 2007 which stated
that the fair market value of the Property was $975,000 as of June 11,
2007. The
[[Page 26418]]
Applicant later determined, however, that the appraisal report
improperly aggregated the values of both the Property and the Adjacent
Parcel in arriving at the $975,000 figure. The Applicant represents
that Paul Muriello has subsequently acknowledged in writing that, if
the Adjacent Parcel were disaggregated from the June, 2007, appraisal,
the standalone value of the Property may have to be adjusted below
$975,000. Nevertheless, the Applicant represents that the proposed
partnership is willing to pay the Plan the greater of $975,000 or the
fair market value of the Property on the date of the transaction.
8. Accordingly, the Applicant proposes a one-time cash sale of the
Property by the Plan to the proposed partnership for the greater of (1)
$975,000 or (2) the fair market value of the Property on the date of
the transaction as established by a qualified, independent appraiser.
The Applicant represents that no Plan assets or monies allocated to
individual participant accounts in the Plan will be utilized to
purchase the Property. The Applicant further states that the proposed
partnership intends to obtain financing from a financial institution to
enable the sale of the Property in exchange for cash; the financial
institution selected for this purpose shall be independent of and
unrelated to the Company, the Applicant, and the intended copartners.
Any mortgage obtained by the proposed partnership in connection with
the acquisition of the Property shall be a nonrecourse loan with no
obligations or liability to the Plan. The Applicant represents that the
sale of the Property by the Plan is administratively feasible in that
it will be a one-time transaction for cash. The Applicant also
represents that the sale is in the interests of the Plan because it
would provide additional liquidity to the Plan. In addition, the
Applicant represents that the sale is protective of the interests of
the Plan because the cash proceeds derived from the sale of the
Property will be invested in a manner that diversifies the assets of
the Plan.
9. In summary, the proposed transaction satisfies the requirements
of section 408(a) of the Act because: (a) The sale is a one-time
transaction for cash; (b) As a result of the sale, the Plan receives
the greater of (i) $975,000, (ii) the fair market value of the Property
as of the date of the transaction as determined by a qualified,
independent appraiser, or (iii) the cost to the Plan to acquire and
hold the Property; (c) The Plan pays no commissions, fees or other
expenses in connection with the sale; (d) The terms and conditions of
the sale are at least as favorable as those obtainable in an arm's
length transaction with an unrelated third party; (e) With respect to
any lease payments for the occupancy of the Property that were made by
the Company to the Plan on or after July 1, 1996 and which (in the
opinion of an MAI-certified, qualified independent appraiser) amounted
to less than the fair market rental value of the Property at the time
of such payment, the Company reimburses the Plan, prior to publication
of a final grant of this requested prohibited transaction exemption,
for the full amount of all such rental shortfalls in the form of a lump
sum payment in arrears plus interest as calculated in conformity with
the requirements of section 5(b)(5) of the Department's Voluntary
Fiduciary Correction (VFC) Program described at 71 FR 20262 (April 19,
2006); and (f) To the extent that there are rental shortfalls
referenced in paragraph (e), the Applicant shall provide the Department
with all relevant documentation pertaining to the calculation of such
shortfall (including the fair market rental value of the Property for
each applicable lease year, the amount of the rental shortfall for each
year, the interest attributable to the rental shortfall for each year,
and proof that the reimbursement was paid to the Plan) prior to
publication of a final grant of this prohibited transaction exemption.
Notice to Interested Persons: A copy of this notice of the proposed
exemption (the Notice) shall be given to all interested persons in the
manner agreed upon by the applicant and the Department within fifteen
(15) days of the date of its publication in the Federal Register. The
Department must receive all written comments and requests for a hearing
no later than forty-five (45) days after publication of the Notice in
the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Judge of the Department,
telephone (202) 693-8339. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (ML&Co.) and BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock);
(Collectively, the Applicants), Located in New York, New York
[Exemption Application No. D-11435].
Proposed Exemption
Based on the facts and representations set forth in the
application, the Department of Labor (the Department) is considering
granting an exemption under the authority of section 408(a) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) and section
4975(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code) and in
accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B
(55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990):
1. Definitions
(a) For purposes of this proposed exemption, the term ``Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities'' includes all entities
listed in Section I(a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3):
(1) Merrill Lynch & Co. (i.e., ML&Co.) and any person directly or
indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with ML&Co.,
(2) BlackRock, Inc. (i.e., BlackRock) and any person directly or
indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with BlackRock, and
(3) Any entity that meets the definition of a Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity during the term of the exemption.
(b) For purposes of section (a), the term ``control'' means the
power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an individual.
2. General Conditions
(a) The applicable Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities maintain(s) or cause(s) to be maintained for a period of six
(6) years from the date of any transaction described herein, such
records as are necessary to enable the persons described in paragraph
(b) to determine whether the conditions of this exemption were met,
except that--
(1) If the records necessary to enable the persons described in
paragraph (b)(1)(i)-(iv) to determine whether the conditions of the
exemption have been met are lost or destroyed, due to circumstances
beyond the control of the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities, then no prohibited transaction will be considered to have
occurred solely on the basis of the unavailability of those records;
and
(2) No party in interest with respect to a plan which engages in
the covered transactions, other than any Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities, shall be subject to the civil penalty that
may be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act or to the taxes imposed
by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code if the records have not been
maintained or are not available for examination as required by
paragraph (b) below.
(b)(1) Except as provided below in paragraph (b)(2), and
notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section
504 of the Act, the records referred to above in paragraph (a) above
are unconditionally available for
[[Page 26419]]
examination during normal business hours at their customary location to
the following persons or an authorized representative thereof--
(i) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department or the Internal Revenue Service, or the SEC; or
(ii) Any fiduciary of any plan that engages in the covered
transactions, or any duly authorized employee or representative of such
fiduciary; or
(iii) Any employer of participants and beneficiaries and any
employee organization whose members are covered by a plan that engages
in the transactions covered herein, or any authorized employee or
representative of these entities; or
(iv) Any participant or beneficiary of a plan that engages in the
transactions covered herein, or duly authorized representative of such
participant or beneficiary;
(2) None of the persons described above in paragraph (b)(1)(ii)-
(iv) shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities, or commercial or financial
information, which is privileged or confidential; and
(3) Should the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
refuse to disclose information on the basis that such information is
exempt from disclosure, pursuant to paragraph (b)(2) above, the Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities shall, by the thirtieth
(30th ) day following the request, provide a written notice advising
that person of the reasons for the refusal and that the Department may
request such information.
3. Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of
Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Certain Broker-
Dealers and Banks--Underwritings
The restrictions of sections 406 of the Act, and the taxes imposed
by reason of section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1) of the Code, shall not apply to the purchase or other
acquisition of certain securities by an employee benefit plan during
the existence of an underwriting or selling syndicate with respect to
such securities, from any person other than a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities, when such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities is a fiduciary with respect to such plan, and a
member of such syndicate, provided that the following conditions are
met:
(a) No Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities which is
involved in any way in causing the plan to make the purchase is a
manager of such underwriting or selling syndicate. For purposes of this
exemption, the term ``manager'' means any member of an underwriting or
selling syndicate who, either alone or together with other members of
the syndicate, is authorized to act on behalf of the members of the
syndicate in connection with the sale and distribution of the
securities being offered or who receives compensation from the members
of the syndicate for its services as a manager of the syndicate.
(b) The securities to be purchased or otherwise acquired are--
(1) Part of an issue registered under the Securities Act of 1933
or, if exempt from such registration requirement, are (i) issued or
guaranteed by the United States or by any person controlled or
supervised by and acting as an instrumentality of the United States
pursuant to authority granted by the Congress of the United States,
(ii) issued by a bank, (iii) issued by a common or contract carrier, if
such issuance is subject to the provisions of section 20a of the
Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, (iv) exempt from such registration
requirement pursuant to a Federal statute other than the Securities Act
of 1933, or (v) are the subject of a distribution and are of a class
which is required to be registered under section 12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 781), and the issuer of which has been
subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 of the Act (15
U.S.C. 78m) for a period of at least 90 days immediately preceding the
sale of securities and has filed all reports required to be filed
thereunder with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the
preceding 12 months.
(2) Purchased at not more than the public offering price prior to
the end of the first full business day after the final term of the
securities have been fixed and announced to the public, except that--
(i) if such securities are offered for subscription upon exercise
of rights, they are purchased on or before the fourth day preceding the
day on which the rights offering terminates; or
(ii) if such securities are debt securities, they may be purchased
at a public offering price on a day subsequent to the end of such first
full business day, provided that the interest rates on comparable debt
securities offered to the public subsequent to such first full business
day and prior to the purchase are less than the interest rate of the
debt securities being purchased.
(3) Offered pursuant to an underwriting agreement under which the
members of the syndicate are committed to purchase all of the
securities being offered, except if--
(i) such securities are purchased by others pursuant to a rights
offering; or
(ii) such securities are offered pursuant to an over-allotment
option.
(c) The issuer of such securities has been in continuous operation
for not less than three years, including the operations of any
predecessors, unless--
(1) Such securities are non-convertible debt securities rated in
one of the four highest rating categories by at least one of the
following rating organizations: Standard & Poor's Rating Services,
Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Ratings Inc., Dominion Bond
Ratings Service Limited, and Dominion Bond Rating Service, Inc., or any
successors thereto;
(2) Such securities are issued or fully guaranteed by a person
described in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this exemption; or
(3) Such securities are issued or fully guaranteed by a person who
has issued securities described in paragraph (b)(1)(ii), (iii), (iv) or
(v), and this paragraph (c) of this exemption.
(d) The amount of such securities to be purchased or otherwise
acquired by the plan does not exceed 3% of the total amount of such
securities being offered.
(e) The consideration to be paid by the plan in purchasing or
otherwise acquiring such securities does not exceed three percent of
the fair market value of the total assets of the plan as of the last
day of the most recent fiscal quarter of the plan prior to such
transaction, provided that if such consideration exceeds $1 million, it
does not exceed 1% of such fair market value of the total assets of the
plan.
If such securities are purchased by the plan from a party in
interest or disqualified person with respect to the plan, such party in
interest or disqualified person shall not be subject to the civil
penalty which may be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act, or to
the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, if the
conditions of this exemption are not met. However, if such securities
are purchased from a party in interest or disqualified person with
respect to the plan, the restrictions of section 406(a) of the Act
shall apply to any fiduciary with respect to the plan and the taxes
imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (D) of the Code, shall apply to such party in
interest or disqualified person, unless the conditions for exemption of
PTE 75-1 (40 FR 50845, October 31, 1975), Part II (relating to certain
principal transactions) are met.
[[Page 26420]]
4. Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of
Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Certain Broker-
Dealers, Reporting Broker-Dealers and Banks--Market-Making
The restrictions of sections 406 of the Act, and the taxes imposed
by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)
of the Code, shall not apply to any purchase or sale of any securities
by an employee benefit plan from or to a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities which is a market-maker with respect to such
securities, when a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
is also a fiduciary with respect to such plan, provided that the
following conditions are met:
(a) The issuer of such securities has been in continuous operation
for not less than three years, including the operations of any
predecessors, unless--
(1) Such securities are non-convertible debt securities rated in
one of the four highest rating categories by at least one of the
following rating organizations: Standard & Poor's Rating Services,
Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Ratings Inc., Dominion Bond
Ratings Service Limited, and Dominion Bond Rating Service, Inc., or any
successors thereto;
(2) Such securities are issued or guaranteed by the United States
or by any person controlled or supervised by and acting as an
instrumentality of the United States pursuant to authority granted by
the Congress of the United States; or
(3) Such securities are fully guaranteed by a person described in
this paragraph (a).
(b) As a result of purchasing such securities--
(1) The fair market value of the aggregate amount of such
securities owned, directly or indirectly, by the plan and with respect
to which such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities is a
fiduciary, does not exceed 3% of the fair market value of the assets of
the plan with respect to which such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities is a fiduciary, as of the last day of the most
recent fiscal quarter of the plan prior to such transaction, provided
that if the fair market value of such securities exceeds $1 million, it
does not exceed one percent of such fair market value of such assets of
the plan, except that this paragraph shall not apply to securities
described in (a)(2) of this exemption; and
(2) The fair market value of the aggregate amount of all securities
for which such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities is a
market-maker, which are owned, directly or indirectly, by the plan and
with respect to which such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities is a fiduciary, does not exceed 10% of the fair market value
of the assets of the plan with respect to which such Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities is a fiduciary, as of the last day
of the most recent fiscal quarter of the plan prior to such
transaction, except that this paragraph shall not apply to securities
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this exemption.
(c) At least one person other than a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities is a market-maker with respect to such
securities.
(d) The transaction is executed at a net price to the plan for the
number of shares or other units to be purchased or sold in the
transaction which is more favorable to the plan than that which such
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities acting as fiduciary
and acting in good faith, reasonably believes to be available at the
time of such transaction from all other market-makers with respect to
such securities.
For purposes of this exemption, the term ``market-maker'' shall
mean any specialist permitted to act as a dealer, and any dealer who,
with respect to a security, holds himself out (by entering quotations
in an inter-dealer communications system or otherwise) as being willing
to buy and sell such security for his own account on a regular or
continuous basis.
5. Exemption Involving Mutual Fund In-House Plans
The restrictions of sections 406 and 407(a) of the Act and the
taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason of
section 4975(c)(1) of the Code, shall not apply to the acquisition or
sale of shares of an open-end investment company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 by an employee benefit plan covering
only employees of such investment company, employees of the investment
adviser or principal underwriter for such investment company, or
employees of any affiliated person (as defined in section 2(a)(3) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940) of such investment adviser or
principal underwriter, provided that the investment adviser or
principal underwriter or their affiliates are a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities, and the following conditions are met
(whether or not such investment company, investment adviser, principal
underwriter or any affiliated person thereof is a fiduciary with
respect to the plan):
(a) The plan does not pay any investment management, investment
advisory or similar fee to such investment adviser, principal
underwriter or affiliated person. This condition does not preclude the
payment of investment advisory fees by the investment company under the
terms of its investment advisory agreement adopted in accordance with
section 15 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(b) The plan does not pay a redemption fee in connection with the
sale by the plan to the investment company of such shares unless (1)
such redemption fee is paid only to the investment company, and (2) the
existence of such redemption fee is disclosed in the investment company
prospectus in effect both at the time of the acquisition of such shares
and at the time of such sale.
(c) The plan does not pay a sales commission in connection with
such acquisition or sale.
(d) All other dealings between the plan and the investment company,
the investment adviser or principal underwriter for the investment
company, or any affiliated person of such investment adviser or
principal underwriter are on a basis no less favorable to the plan than
such dealings are with other shareholders of the investment company.
6. Exemption for Certain Transactions Between Investment Companies and
Employee Benefit Plans
The restrictions of section 406 of the Act and the taxes imposed by
section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1) of
the Code, shall not apply to the purchase or sale by an employee
benefit plan of shares of an open-end investment company registered
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, where the investment adviser
of the investment company is a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities, who is also a fiduciary with respect to the plan but not
an employer of employees covered by the plan, provided that the
following conditions are met:
(a) The plan does not pay a sales commission in connection with
such purchase or sale.
(b) The plan does not pay a redemption fee in connection with the
sale by the plan to the investment company of such shares unless (1)
such redemption fee is paid only to the investment company, and (2) the
existence of such redemption fee is disclosed in the investment company
[[Page 26421]]
prospectus in effect both at the time of the purchase of such shares
and at the time of such sale.
(c) The plan does not pay an investment management, investment
advisory or similar fee with respect to the plan assets invested in
such shares for the entire period of such investment. This condition
does not preclude the payment of investment advisory fees by the
investment company under the terms of its investment advisory agreement
adopted in accordance with section 15 of the Investment Company Act of
1940. This condition also does not preclude payment of an investment
advisory fee by the plan based on total plan assets from which a credit
has been subtracted representing the plan's pro rata share of
investment advisory fees paid by the investment company. If, during any
fee period for which the plan has prepaid its investment management,
investment advisory or similar fee, the plan purchases shares of the
investment company, the requirement of this paragraph (c) shall be
deemed met with respect to such prepaid fee if by a method reasonably
designed to accomplish the same, the amount of the prepaid fee that
constitutes the fee with respect to the plan assets invested in the
investment company shares (1) is anticipated and subtracted from the
prepaid fee at the time of payment of such fee, (2) is returned to the
plan no later than during the immediately following fee period, or (3)
is offset against the prepaid fee for the immediately following fee
period or for the fee period immediately following thereafter. For
purposes of this paragraph (c), a fee shall be deemed to be prepaid for
any fee period if the amount of such fee is calculated as of a date not
later than the first day of such period.
(d) A second fiduciary with respect to the plan, who is independent
of and unrelated to the fiduciary/investment adviser or any affiliate
thereof, receives a current prospectus issued by the investment
company, and full and detailed written disclosure of the investment
advisory and other fees charged to or paid by the plan and the
investment company, including the nature and extent of any differential
between the rates of such fees, the reasons why the fiduciary/
investment adviser may consider such purchases to be appropriate for
the plan, and whether there are any limitations on the fiduciary/
investment adviser with respect to which plan assets may be invested in
shares of the investment company and, if so, the nature of such
limitations. For purposes of this paragraph (d), such second fiduciary
will not be deemed to be independent of and unrelated to the fiduciary/
investment adviser or any affiliate thereof if:
(1) Such second fiduciary directly or indirectly controls, is
controlled by, or is under common with the fiduciary/investment adviser
or any affiliate thereof;
(2) Such second fiduciary, or any officer, director, partner,
employee or relative of such second fiduciary is an officer, director,
partner, employee or relative of such fiduciary/investment adviser or
any affiliate thereof; or
(3) Such second fiduciary directly or indirectly receives any
compensation or other consideration for his or her own personal account
in connection with any transaction described in this exemption.
If an officer, director, partner, employee or relative of such
fiduciary/investment adviser or any affiliate thereof is a director of
such second fiduciary, and if he or she abstains from participation in
(i) the choice of the plan's investment adviser, (ii) the approval of
any such purchase or sale between the plan and the investment company,
and (iii) the approval of any change of fees charged to or paid by the
plan, then paragraph (d) of this exemption shall not apply.
For purposes of paragraph (d)(1) above, the term ``control'' means
the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an individual, and the term
``relative'' means a ``relative'' as that term is defined in section
3(15) of the Act (or a ``member of the family'' as that term is defined
in section 4975(e)(6) of the Code), or a brother, a sister, or a spouse
of a brother or a sister.
(e) On the basis of the prospectus and disclosure referred to in
paragraph (d), the second fiduciary referred to in paragraph (d)
approves such purchases and sales consistent with the responsibilities
obligations, and duties imposed on fiduciaries by Part 4 of Title I of
the Act. Such approval may be limited solely to the investment advisory
and other fees paid by the mutual fund in relation to the fees paid by
the plan and need not relate to any other aspects of such investments.
In addition, such approval must be either (1) set forth in the plan
documents or in the investment management agreement between the plan
and the fiduciary/investment adviser, (2) indicated in writing prior to
each purchase or sale, or (3) indicated in writing prior to the
commencement of a specified purchase or sale program in the shares of
such investment company.
(f) The second fiduciary referred to in paragraph (d), above, or
any successor thereto, is notified of any change in any of the rates of
fees referred to in paragraph (d) and approves in writing the
continuation of such purchases or sales and the continued holding of
any investment company shares acquired by the plan prior to such change
and still held by the plan. Such approval may be limited solely to the
investment advisory and other fees paid by the mutual fund in relation
to the fees paid by the plan and need not relate to any other aspects
of such investment.
7. Exemption Involving Closed-End Investment Company In-House Plans
The restrictions of sections 406 and 407(a) of the Act, and the
taxes imposed by section 4975 (a) and (b) of the Code, by reason of
section 4975(c)(1) of the Code, shall not apply to the acquisition,
ownership or sale of shares of a closed-end investment company which is
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and is not a small
business investment company as defined by section 103 of the Small
Business Investment Company Act of 1958, by an employee benefit plan
covering only employees of such investment company, employees of the
investment adviser of such investment company, or employees of any
affiliated person (as defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940) of such investment company or investment adviser,
provided that such entity or entities are a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities, and the following conditions are met
(whether or not such investment company, investment adviser or any
affiliated person thereof is a fiduciary with respect to the plan):
(a) The plan does not pay any investment management, investment
advisory, or similar fee to such investment adviser or affiliated
person. This condition does not preclude the payment of investment
advisory fees by the investment company under the terms of its
investment advisory agreement adopted in accordance with section 15 of
the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(b) The plan does not pay a sales commission in connection with
such acquisition or sale to any such investment company or to any such
investment company, investment adviser or affiliated person; and
(c) All other dealings between the plan and such investment
company, the investment adviser, or affiliated person, are on a basis
no less favorable to the plan than such dealings are with other
[[Page 26422]]
shareholders of the investment company.
8. Exemption for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit
Plans and Broker-Dealers
Section I: Definition and Special Rules
The following definitions and special rules apply to this
exemption:
(a) The term ``Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities''
includes affiliates of such entity or entities.
(b) An ``affiliate'' of a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities includes the following:
(1) Any officer, director, partner, employee, relative (as defined
in section 3(15) of the Act), brother, sister, or spouse of a brother
or sister, of the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities;
and
(2) any corporation or partnership of which the Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities is an officer, director or
partner.
A person is not an affiliate of another person solely because one
of them has investment discretion over the other's assets.
(c) An ``agency cross transaction'' is a securities transaction in
which the same Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
act(s) as agent for both any seller and any buyer for the purchase or
sale of a security.
(d) The term ``covered transaction'' means an action described in
Section II (a), (b) or (c) of this exemption.
(e) The term ``effecting or executing a securities transaction''
means the execution of a securities transaction as agent for another
person and/or the performance of clearance, settlement, custodial or
other functions ancillary thereto.
(f) A plan fiduciary is independent of a Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
Related Entity or Entities only if the fiduciary has no relationship to
or interest in such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
that might affect the exercise of such fiduciary's best judgment as a
fiduciary.
(g) The term ``profit'' includes all charges relating to effecting
or executing securities transactions, less reasonable and necessary
expenses including reasonable indirect expenses (such as overheard
costs) properly allocated to the performance of these transactions
under generally accepted accounting principles.
(h) The term ``securities transaction'' means the purchase or sale
of securities.
(i) The term ``nondiscretionary trustee'' of a plan means a trustee
or custodian whose powers and duties with respect to any assets of the
plan are limited to (1) the provision of nondiscretionary trust
services to the plan, and (2) duties imposed on the trustee by any
provision or provisions of the Act or the Code. The term
``nondiscretionary trust services and services'' means custodial
services and services ancillary to custodial services, none of which
services are discretionary. For purposes of this exemption, a person
does not fail to be a nondiscretionary trustee solely by reason of
having been delegated, by the sponsor of a master or prototype plan,
the power to amend such plan.
Section II: Covered Transactions
If each condition of Section III of this exemption is either
satisfied or not applicable under Section IV of this exemption, the
restrictions of section 406(b) of the Act and the taxes imposed by
section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(E)
and (F) of the Code shall not apply to--
(a) A Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities that is a
plan fiduciary using its authority to cause a plan to pay a fee to a
Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities as agent for the
plan, for effecting or executing securities transactions, but only to
the extent that such transactions are not excessive, under the
circumstances, in either amount or frequency;
(b) A Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities that is a
plan fiduciary acting as the agent in an agency cross transaction for
both the plan and one or more other parties to the transaction; or
(c) The receipt by any Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities that is a plan fiduciary of reasonable compensation for
effecting or executing an agency cross transaction to which a plan is a
party from one or more other parties to the transaction.
Section III: Conditions
Except to the extent otherwise provided in Section IV of this
exemption, Section II of this exemption applies only if the following
conditions are satisfied:
(a) The Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity engaging in the
covered transaction is not an administrator of the plan, or an employer
any of whose employees are covered by the plan.
(b)(1) The covered transaction is performed under a written
authorization executed in advance by a fiduciary of each plan whose
assets are involved in the transaction, which plan fiduciary is
independent of the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
engaging in the covered transaction.
(2) For purposes of this exemption, Section III(b) will be deemed
satisfied for the period commencing September 29, 2006, notwithstanding
Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, LLC (MLIM)'s reliance on written
authorizations obtained prior to the consummation of the Merger \3\,
provided that after the closing of the Merger, MLIM notified each such
authorizing plan fiduciary of the fact that: (A) As a result of the
Merger, MLIM had become a subsidiary of BlackRock; (B) the existing
authorization by such authorizing plan fiduciary would continue to
permit MLIM to engage in the covered transaction on behalf of the plan;
(C) such authorization is terminable at will by the plan, without
penalty to the plan, upon receipt by MLIM of written notice from an
authorizing plan fiduciary of termination; (D) a form expressly
providing an election to terminate the authorization with instructions
on the use of such form was supplied to each such authorizing plan
fiduciary; and (E) failure to return such termination form would result
in the continued authorization of MLIM to engage in the covered
transactions on behalf of the plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this
exception does not apply to new authorizations to engage in covered
transactions entered into after the consummation of the Merger.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ On September 29, 2006, ML&Co. and BlackRock consummated a
transaction (the Merger), in which ML&Co. contributed MLIM and
various other assets and subsidiaries that comprised its investment
management business to BlackRock in exchange for approximately 45%
of the outstanding voting securities of BlackRock.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) The authorization referred to in paragraph (b) of this Section
is terminable at will by the plan, without penalty to the plan, upon
receipt by the authorized Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities of written notice of termination. A form expressly providing
an election to terminate the authorization described in paragraph (b)
of this Section with instructions on the use of the form must be
supplied to the authorizing plan fiduciary no less than annually. The
instructions for such form must include the following information:
(1) The authorization is terminable at will by the plan, without
penalty to the plan, upon receipt by the authorized Merrill Lynch/
BlackRock Related Entity or Entities of written notice from the
authorizing plan fiduciary or other plan official having authority to
terminate the authorization; and
(2) Failure to return the form will result in the continued
authorization of the authorized Merrill Lynch/BlackRock
[[Page 26423]]
Related Entity or Entities to engage in the covered transactions on
behalf of the plan.
(d) Within three months before an authorization is made, the
authorizing plan fiduciary is furnished with any reasonably available
information that the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
seeking authorization reasonably believes to be necessary for the
authorizing plan fiduciary to determine whether the authorization
should be made including (but not limited to) a copy of this exemption,
the form for termination of authorization described in Section III(c)
of this exemption, a description of the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities' brokerage placement practices, and any other
reasonably available information regarding the matter that the
authorizing plan fiduciary requests.
(e) The Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities engaging
in a covered transaction furnishes the authorizing plan fiduciary with
either:
(1) A confirmation slip for each securities transaction underlying
a covered transaction within ten business days of the securities
transaction containing the information described in Rule 10b-10(a)(1-7)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 17 CFR 240.10b-10; or
(2) at least once every three months and not later than 45 days
following the period to which it relates, a report disclosing:
(A) A compilation of the information that would be provided to the
plan pursuant to subparagraph (e)(1) of this Section during the three-
month period covered by the report;
(B) The total of all securities transaction-related charges
incurred by the plan during such period in connection with such covered
transactions; and
(C) The amount of the securities transaction-related charges
retained by such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities and
the amount of such charges paid to other persons for execution or other
services.
For purposes of this paragraph (e), the words ``incurred by the
plan'' shall be construed to mean ``incurred by the pooled fund'' when
such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities engages in
covered transactions on behalf of a pooled fund in which the plan
participates.
(f) The authorizing plan fiduciary is furnished with a summary of
the information required under paragraph (e)(1) of this Section at
least once per year. The summary must be furnished within 45 days after
the end of the period to which it relates, and must contain the
following:
(1) The total of all securities transaction-related charges
incurred by the plan during the period in connection with covered
securities transactions.
(2) The amount of the securities transaction-related charges
retained by the authorized Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities and the amount of these charges paid to other persons for
execution or other services.
(3) A description of the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities' brokerage placement practices, if such practices have
materially changed during the period covered by the summary.
(4) (i) A portfolio turnover ratio is calculated in a manner which
is reasonably designed to provide the authorizing plan fiduciary with
the information needed to assist in discharging its duty of prudence.
The requirements of this paragraph (f)(4)(i) will be met if the
``annualized portfolio turnover ratio'', calculated in the manner
described in paragraph (f)(4)(ii), is contained in the summary.
(ii) The ``annualized portfolio turnover ratio'' shall be
calculated as a percentage of the plan assets consisting of securities
or cash over which the authorized Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related
Entity or Entities had discretionary investment authority, or with
respect to which such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or
Entities rendered, or had any responsibility to render, investment
advice (the portfolio) at any time or times (management period(s))
during the period covered by the report. First, the ``portfolio
turnover ratio'' (not annualized) is obtained by dividing (A) the
lesser of the aggregate dollar amounts of purchases or sales of
portfolio securities during the management period(s) by (B) the monthly
average of the market value of the portfolio securities during all
management period(s). Such monthly average is calculated by totaling
the market values of the portfolio securities as of the beginning and
ending of each management period and as of the end of each month that
ends within such period(s), and dividing the sum by the number of
valuation dates so used. For purposes of this calculation, all debt
securities whose maturities at the time of acquisition were one year or
less are excluded from both the numerator and the denominator.
The ``annualized portfolio turnover ratio'' is then derived by
multiplying the ``portfolio turnover ratio'' by an annualizing factor.
The annualizing factor is obtained by dividing (C) the number twelve by
(D) the aggregate duration of the management period(s) expressed in
months (and fractions thereof).
(iii) The information described in this paragraph (f)(4) is not
required to be furnished in any case where the authorized Merrill
Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities acting as plan fiduciary has
not exercised discretionary authority over trading in the plan's
account during the period covered by the report.
For purposes of this paragraph (f), the words ``incurred by the
plan'' shall be construed to mean ``incurred by the pooled fund'' when
such Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities engages in
covered transactions on behalf of a pooled fund in which the plan
participates.
(g) If an agency cross transaction to which Section IV(b) of this
exemption does not apply is involved, the following conditions must
also be satisfied:
(1) The information required under Section III(d) or IV(d)(1)(B) of
this exemption includes a statement to the effect that with respect to
agency cross transactions, the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities effecting or executing the transactions will have a
potentially conflicting division of loyalties and responsibilities
regarding the parties to the transactions;
(2) The summary required under Section III(f) of this exemption
includes a statement identifying the total number of agency cross
transactions during the period covered by the summary and the total
amount of all commissions or other remuneration received or to be
received from all sources by the Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity
or Entities engaging in the transactions in connection with those
transaction during the period;
(3) The Merrill Lynch/BlackRock Related Entity or Entities
effecting or executing the agency cross transaction has the
discretionary authority to act on behalf of, and/or provide investment
advice to, either (A) one or more sellers or (B) one or more buyers
with respect to the transaction, but not both.
(4) The agency cross transaction is a purchase or sale, for no
consideration other than cash payment against prompt delivery of a
security for which market quotations are readily available; and
(5) The agency cross transaction is executed or effected at a price
that is at or between the independent bid and independent ask prices
for the security prevailing at the time of the transaction.
(h) A trustee (other than a nondiscretionary trustee) may only
[[Page 26424]]
engage in a covered transaction with a plan that has total net assets
with a value of at least $50 million and in the case of a pooled fund,
the $50 million net asset requirement will be met if 50 percent or more
of the units of beneficial interest in such pooled fund are held by
plans each of which has total net assets with a value of at least $50
million.
For purposes of the net asset tests described above, where a group
of plans is maintained by a single employer or controlled group of
employers, as defined in section 407(d)(7) of the Act, the $50 million
net asset requirement may be met by aggregating the assets of such
plans, if the assets are pooled for investment purposes in a single
master trust.
(i) The trustee (other than a nondiscretionary trustee) engaging in
a covered transaction furnishes, at least annually, to the authorizing
plan fiduciary of each plan the following:
(1) The aggregate brokerage commissions, expressed in dollars, paid
by the plan to brokerage firms affiliated with the trustee;
(2) The aggregate brokerage commissions, expressed in dollars, paid
by the plan to brokerage firms unaffiliated with the trustee;
(3) The average brokerage commissions, expressed as cents per
share, paid by the plan to brokerage firms affiliated with the trustee;
and
(4) The average brokerage commissions, expressed as cents per
share, paid by the plan to brokerage firms unaffiliated with the
trustee.
For purposes of this paragraph (i), the words ``paid by the plan''
should be construed to mean ``paid by the pooled fund'' when the
trustee engages in covered transactions on behalf of a pooled fund in
which the plan participates.
Section IV: Exceptions From Conditions
(a) Certain plans not covering employees. Section III of this
exemption does not apply to covered transactions to the extent they are
engaged in on behalf of individual retirement accounts meeting the
conditions of 29 CFR 2510.3-2(d), or plans, other than training
programs, that cover no employees within the meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3-
3.
(b) Certain agency cro