Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 26080-26081 [E8-10278]
Download as PDF
26080
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Notices
Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and
Strip from India and Taiwan (Inv. Nos.
701–TA–415 and 731–TA–933–934,
USITC Publication 3994 (Review)(April
2008)).
International Trade Administration
[C–533–825]
Continuation of Countervailing Duty
Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the countervailing
duty order on Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and
Strip from India would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies and material
injury to an industry in the United
States, the Department is publishing a
notice of continuation for this
countervailing duty order.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 2008.
CONTACT INFORMATION: Elfi Blum or Dana
Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0197 or (202) 482–1391,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
The Department initiated and the ITC
instituted a sunset review of the
countervailing duty order on PET Film,
Sheet, and Strip from India, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act). See Initiation of
Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 72 FR
30544 (June 1,2007) (Initiation).
As a result of its review, the
Department found that revocation of the
countervailing duty order would likely
lead to a continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies, and therefore
notified the ITC of the magnitude of the
rates likely to prevail were the order to
be revoked. See Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
from India, 72 FR 57300 (October 9,
2007) (Final Sunset Review PET Film
from India).
On April 10, 2008, the ITC
determined, pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act, that revocation of the
countervailing duty order on PET Film,
Sheet, and Strip from India would likely
lead to a continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time. See Polyethylene
17:22 May 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
The products covered by this order
are all gauges of raw, pretreated or
primed PET film, whether extruded or
coextruded. Excluded are metallized
films and other finished films that have
had at least one of their surfaces
modified by the application of a
performance–enhancing resinous or
inorganic layer of more than 0.00001
inches thick. Imports of PET film are
currently classifiable in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) under item number
3920.62.90. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for the
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of these
orders is dispositive. Since this order
was published, there has been one scope
determination for PET film from India,
dated August 25, 2003. In this
determination, requested by
International Packaging Films Inc., the
Department determined that tracing and
drafting film is outside of the scope of
the order on PET film from India. See
Notice of Scope Rulings, 70 FR 24533
(May 10, 2005).
Continuation of Order
Background
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Dated: May 2, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–10273 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am]
Scope of the Order
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
As a result of these determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of the countervailing duty
order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies and material
injury to an industry in the United
States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of
the Act, the Department hereby orders
the continuation of the countervailing
duty order on PET Film from India. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection will
continue to collect cash deposits at the
rate in effect at the time of entry for all
imports of subject merchandise.
The effective date of continuation of
this order is the date of publication in
the Federal Register of this notice of
continuation. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department
intends to initiate the next five-year
review of this order not later than 30
days prior to the fifth anniversary of the
effective date of continuation.
This five-year (sunset) review and this
notice are in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–813]
Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 27, 2007, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the new shipper review of the
antidumping duty order on canned
pineapple fruit (CPF) from Thailand.
This review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise to
the United States, C & A Products Co.,
Ltd. (C&A). The period of review (POR)
is July 1, 2006 through December 31,
2006. Subsequent to the preliminary
results, we conducted verification and
provided parties with an opportunity to
comment. As discussed below in the
section on ‘‘Verification,’’ no changes to
the preliminary dumping margin were
warranted by the results of verification.
Furthermore, no parties submitted any
comments. Therefore, the final results
do not differ from those presented in the
preliminary results. The final weighted–
average dumping margin for C&A is
listed below in the section entitled
‘‘Final Results of Review.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Myrna Lobo, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2371.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 27, 2007, the
Department published the preliminary
results of the new shipper review of the
antidumping duty order on CPF from
Thailand. See Canned Pineapple Fruit
from Thailand: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review,
72 FR 73318 (December 27, 2007). Since
the publication of the preliminary
results, we conducted verification of
C&A’s sales information in Bangkok,
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Notices
Thailand and issued our verification
report. See Memorandum to File
through Dana Mermelstein, Program
Manager from Myrna Lobo,
International Trade Compliance
Analyst, Verification of the Sales
Response of C & A Products Co., Ltd. in
the Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review of Canned Pineapple Fruit from
Thailand (Verification Report), dated
February 21, 2008, the public version of
which is on file in the Central Records
Unit (CRU) located in room 1117 of the
Main Commece Building. On February
25, 2008 we issued a briefing schedule
giving interested parties the opportunity
to submit comments. On March 10,
2008, the Department extended the time
limit for completion of the final results
of the instant new shipper review to
May 19, 2008. See Canned Pineapple
Fruit from Thailand: Extension of Time
Limit for Final Results of Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review, 73 FR 12704
(March 10, 2008). No comments were
submitted by any of the parties.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is
CPF, defined as pineapple processed
and/or prepared into various product
forms, including rings, pieces, chunks,
tidbits, and crushed pineapple, that is
packed and cooked in metal cans with
either pineapple juice or sugar syrup
added. CPF is currently classifiable
under subheadings 2008.20.0010 and
2008.20.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). HTSUS 2008.20.0010
covers CPF packed in a sugar–based
syrup; HTSUS 2008.20.0090 covers CPF
packed without added sugar (i.e., juice–
packed). Although these HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and for customs purposes,
the written description of the scope is
dispositive. There have been no scope
rulings for the subject order.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Period of Review
This review covers the period July 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006.
Bona Fides Analysis of U.S. Sales
In the preliminary results, we found
that C&A’s reported U.S. sales during
the POR were bona fide sales, as
required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv)(c),
based on the totality of the facts on the
record. See Memorandum to Barbara E.
Tillman, Office Director, from Myrna
Lobo, International Trade Compliance
Analyst regarding Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review of Canned
Pineapple Fruit from Thailand: Bona
Fides Analysis of Sales Reported by C &
A Products Co., Ltd., dated December
19, 2007, for further discussion of our
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 May 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
price and quantity analysis. No
comments were submitted on our
preliminary finding and we found no
information at verification which would
alter our finding. Therefore, for these
final results, the Department continues
to find that C&A’s U.S. sales during the
POR were bona fide commercial
transactions.
Verification
As provided in 19 CFR
351.307(b)(1)(iv), the Department
conducted verification of C&A’s
questionnaire responses at the
company’s offices in Bangkok, Thailand
from February 4, 2008 to February 7,
2008. Our verification results are
detailed in Verification Report. We
accepted one minor correction at
verification to the inventory turnover
days reported by C&A. The corrected
inventory turnover days was verified.
See Verification Report at page 2.
The correction to inventory turnover
days results in a revision to inventory
carrying costs. However, in this case,
these costs are not used in our margin
calculation, and this change has no
impact on the final margin calculations.
Therefore, the final results are the same
as the preliminary results.
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following
weighted–average margin percentage
exists for the period July 1, 2006,
through December 31, 2006:
26081
Department revoked this order effective
October 31, 2007. See Canned Pineapple
Fruit from Thailand: Notice of Final
Results of Changed Circumstances
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
and Revocation of Antidumping Duty
Order, 73 FR 21311 (April 21, 2008).
The Department notified U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to
discontinue suspension of liquidation
on entries of the subject merchandise
entered or withdrawn from warehouse
on or after October 31, 2007, the
effective date of revocation of the
antidumping duty order. Therefore, cash
deposits of estimated antidumping
duties are no longer required.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility,
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
C & A Products Co.,
Ltd. ............................
0.00% disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
Assessment
information in this segment of the
The Department shall determine, and
proceeding. Timely written notification
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
of the return/destruction of APO
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries, in accordance materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
with 19 CFR 351.212. We will instruct
CBP to assess antidumping duties on all Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
appropriate entries covered by this
which is subject to sanction.
review if the importer–specific
assessment rate calculated in the final
This new shipper review is issued
results of this review is above de
and published in accordance with
minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 percent).
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we
the Act, as well as 19 CFR 351.214(i).
will instruct CBP to liquidate without
Dated: May 2, 2008.
regard to antidumping duties any
David M. Spooner,
entries for which the assessment rate is
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). Assistant Secretary for Import
The Department intends to issue
Administration.
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
[FR Doc. E8–10278 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am]
after the date of publication of these
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
final results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 90 (Thursday, May 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26080-26081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10278]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-549-813]
Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 27, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of the new shipper review
of the antidumping duty order on canned pineapple fruit (CPF) from
Thailand. This review covers one producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise to the United States, C & A Products Co., Ltd. (C&A). The
period of review (POR) is July 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006.
Subsequent to the preliminary results, we conducted verification and
provided parties with an opportunity to comment. As discussed below in
the section on ``Verification,'' no changes to the preliminary dumping
margin were warranted by the results of verification. Furthermore, no
parties submitted any comments. Therefore, the final results do not
differ from those presented in the preliminary results. The final
weighted-average dumping margin for C&A is listed below in the section
entitled ``Final Results of Review.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo, AD/CVD Operations, Office
6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2371.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 27, 2007, the Department published the preliminary
results of the new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on CPF
from Thailand. See Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 72 FR 73318 (December
27, 2007). Since the publication of the preliminary results, we
conducted verification of C&A's sales information in Bangkok,
[[Page 26081]]
Thailand and issued our verification report. See Memorandum to File
through Dana Mermelstein, Program Manager from Myrna Lobo,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, Verification of the Sales
Response of C & A Products Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review of Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand (Verification
Report), dated February 21, 2008, the public version of which is on
file in the Central Records Unit (CRU) located in room 1117 of the Main
Commece Building. On February 25, 2008 we issued a briefing schedule
giving interested parties the opportunity to submit comments. On March
10, 2008, the Department extended the time limit for completion of the
final results of the instant new shipper review to May 19, 2008. See
Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand: Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 73 FR 12704 (March 10,
2008). No comments were submitted by any of the parties.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is CPF, defined as pineapple
processed and/or prepared into various product forms, including rings,
pieces, chunks, tidbits, and crushed pineapple, that is packed and
cooked in metal cans with either pineapple juice or sugar syrup added.
CPF is currently classifiable under subheadings 2008.20.0010 and
2008.20.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS''). HTSUS 2008.20.0010 covers CPF packed in a sugar-based
syrup; HTSUS 2008.20.0090 covers CPF packed without added sugar (i.e.,
juice-packed). Although these HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and for customs purposes, the written description of the
scope is dispositive. There have been no scope rulings for the subject
order.
Period of Review
This review covers the period July 1, 2006 through December 31,
2006.
Bona Fides Analysis of U.S. Sales
In the preliminary results, we found that C&A's reported U.S. sales
during the POR were bona fide sales, as required by 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iv)(c), based on the totality of the facts on the record.
See Memorandum to Barbara E. Tillman, Office Director, from Myrna Lobo,
International Trade Compliance Analyst regarding Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review of Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand: Bona Fides
Analysis of Sales Reported by C & A Products Co., Ltd., dated December
19, 2007, for further discussion of our price and quantity analysis. No
comments were submitted on our preliminary finding and we found no
information at verification which would alter our finding. Therefore,
for these final results, the Department continues to find that C&A's
U.S. sales during the POR were bona fide commercial transactions.
Verification
As provided in 19 CFR 351.307(b)(1)(iv), the Department conducted
verification of C&A's questionnaire responses at the company's offices
in Bangkok, Thailand from February 4, 2008 to February 7, 2008. Our
verification results are detailed in Verification Report. We accepted
one minor correction at verification to the inventory turnover days
reported by C&A. The corrected inventory turnover days was verified.
See Verification Report at page 2.
The correction to inventory turnover days results in a revision to
inventory carrying costs. However, in this case, these costs are not
used in our margin calculation, and this change has no impact on the
final margin calculations. Therefore, the final results are the same as
the preliminary results.
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following weighted-average margin percentage
exists for the period July 1, 2006, through December 31, 2006:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer/Exporter Margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C & A Products Co., Ltd............................. 0.00%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212. We will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review if the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final
results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50
percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which
the assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). The
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these final results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.222(i)(2)(i), the Department revoked this order effective October
31, 2007. See Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand: Notice of Final
Results of Changed Circumstances Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 73 FR 21311 (April 21, 2008).
The Department notified U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
discontinue suspension of liquidation on entries of the subject
merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse on or after October 31,
2007, the effective date of revocation of the antidumping duty order.
Therefore, cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties are no longer
required.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This new shipper review is issued and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, as well as 19 CFR
351.214(i).
Dated: May 2, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-10278 Filed 5-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S