Privacy Act Regulations, 26056-26059 [E8-10110]
Download as PDF
26056
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:57 May 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is not likely to have a
significant effect on the human
environment. A preliminary
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage Grounds.
Words of Issuance and Proposed
Regulatory Text
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through
1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 110.60, by revising
paragraph (aa) to read as follows:
§ 110.60
*
PO 00000
*
Port of New York and vicinity.
*
Frm 00014
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
(aa) Perth Amboy, NJ. All waters
bound by the following points:
40°30′19.0″ N, 074°15′46.0″ W; thence to
40°30′17.0″ N, 074°15′39.0″ W; thence to
40°30′02.8″ N, 074°15′45.0″ W; thence to
40°29′36.0″ N, 074°16′09.2″ W; thence to
40°29′30.8″ N, 074°16′22.0″ W; thence to
40°29′47.2″ N, 074°16′52.0″ W; thence to
40°30′02.0″ N, 074°16′43.0″ W, thence
along the shoreline to the point of
origin.
Note: This area is limited to vessels no
greater than 20 meters in length and is
primarily for use by recreational craft on a
seasonal or transient basis. These regulations
do not prohibit the placement of moorings
within the anchorage area, but requests for
the placement of moorings should be
directed to the local government to ensure
compliance with local and state laws. All
moorings shall be so placed that no vessel,
when anchored, will at any time extend
beyond the limits of the area.
Fixed mooring piles or stakes are
prohibited. Mariners are encouraged to
contact the local harbormaster for any
additional ordinances and to ensure
compliance with additional applicable
state and local laws.
Dated: April 23, 2008.
Timothy V. Skuby,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E8–10259 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 5b
[Docket ID ED–2008–OM–0004]
RIN 1880–AA85
Privacy Act Regulations
Office of Management,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Education
(Department) proposes to amend its
regulations implementing the Privacy
Act of 1974, as amended (Privacy Act).
These proposed regulations would
amend the Department’s current Privacy
Act regulations to exempt from certain
Privacy Act requirements investigative
material in a new system of records to
be maintained by the Department that
will be known as the Office of Inspector
General Data Analytics System (ODAS)
(18–10–02). Specifically, the exemption
would apply to materials compiled by
the Department’s Office of Inspector
General (OIG) for law enforcement
purposes to identify internal control
weaknesses and system issues and to
improve methods of data modeling and
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
annual audit planning in order to detect
and investigate fraud, waste, and
mismanagement in Department
programs and operations.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before June 9, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. We will not accept
comments by fax or by e-mail. Please
submit your comments only one time, in
order to ensure that we do not receive
duplicate copies. In addition, please
include the Docket ID at the top of your
comments.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov to submit
your comments electronically.
Information on using Regulations.gov,
including instructions for accessing
agency documents, submitting
comments, and viewing the docket, is
available on the site under ‘‘How To Use
This Site.’’
• Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery,
or Hand Delivery. If you mail or deliver
your comments about these proposed
regulations, address them to Regulatory
Information Management Services,
Office of Management, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., Room 8166, Washington, DC
20202–5920. Attention: NOPR
Comments.
Privacy Note: The Department’s policy for
comments received from members of the
public (including those comments submitted
by mail, commercial delivery, or hand
delivery) is to make these submissions
available for public viewing in their entirety
on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters
should be careful to include in their
comments only information that they wish to
make publicly available on the Internet.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shelley Shepherd, Office of Inspector
General, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 8166,
Washington, DC 20202–5920.
Telephone: (202) 245–7077.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at
1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments
regarding these proposed regulations.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:57 May 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
We also invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
these proposed regulations. Please let us
know of any further opportunities we
should take to reduce potential costs or
increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient
administration of the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about these proposed regulations by
accessing Regulations.gov. You may also
inspect the comments, in person, at the
National Library of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC 20202, between the hours of 8:30
a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern time, Monday
through Friday of each week except
Federal holidays. For more information
on inspecting public comments call
(202) 205–4410.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for these proposed regulations. If
you want to schedule an appointment
for this type of aid, please contact the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Background
Under the Inspector General Act of
1978, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix)
Inspectors General, including the
Department’s Inspector General (OIG),
are responsible for conducting,
supervising, and coordinating audits
and investigations relating to programs
and operations of the Federal agency for
which their office is established. The
Department intends to establish a new
system of records entitled the ‘‘Office of
Inspector General Data Analytics
System’’ (ODAS) (18–10–02) in order to
facilitate the OIG’s performance of this
statutory duty.
The new system of records will be
managed by the OIG’s Information
Technology Audits and Computer
Crimes Investigations (ITACCI) division,
which is responsible for providing
computer programming, data
acquisition and analysis and statistical
modeling in support of OIG operations.
ITACCI will use this new system of
records to gather data from Department
systems and analyze them using data
modeling techniques to detect waste,
fraud, abuse, and internal control
weaknesses and to identify potential
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26057
violations of laws, rules and regulations.
These data will include information
related to transactions between the
Department and individuals and entities
that have applied for and/or received
grants, contracts, loans, or payments
from the Department. ITACCI will
conduct data modeling on these data,
using statistical and mathematical
techniques, in order to predict
anomalies indicating fraudulent activity
and to predict which transactions have
a high probability of fraudulent activity.
ITACCI will review this information
to determine whether further action is
warranted. If so, ITACCI will refer
potential violations of law, rules, or
regulations that it identifies to other
divisions of OIG for investigation, audit,
or inspection, as appropriate. Thus, the
ODAS will contain data related to
transactions with the Department, as
well as information related to ITACCI’s
review and investigation of that data for
law enforcement purposes.
Pursuant to section (k)(2) of the
Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), the
Secretary, through rulemaking, may
exempt from a limited number of
Privacy Act requirements a system of
records that contains investigatory
materials compiled for law enforcement
purposes. The investigatory materials in
the ODAS will fall within the scope of
section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act because
the system will consist of investigatory
materials compiled for purposes of
enforcing Federal legal requirements
applicable to individuals and entities
receiving Department funds.
Significant Proposed Regulations
Exempt Systems (§ 5b.11(c))
Statute: Section (k)(2) of the Privacy
Act provides that the head of any
agency may promulgate rules to exempt
any system of records from the
requirements in sections (c)(3), (d),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f) of
the Privacy Act if the system of records
contains investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes
other than material related to criminal
subjects and investigations that is
within the scope of section (j)(2) of the
Privacy Act. Section (k)(2) provides,
however, that, in the event that any
individual is denied any right, privilege,
or benefit that the individual would
otherwise be entitled to by Federal law,
or for which the individual would
otherwise be eligible, as a result of the
maintenance of the material, the
material must be provided to the
individual, unless the disclosure of such
material would reveal the identity of a
source who furnished the information to
the Department under an express
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
26058
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
promise, or, prior to September 27,
1975, an implied promise that the
identity of the source would be held in
confidence.
Current Regulations: The Department
does not currently claim any exemption
under section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act
for the investigatory materials that will
be maintained in the ODAS. However,
the Department claims exemptions
under this section for two other OIG
systems of records—the Investigative
Files of the Inspector General (18–10–
01) and the Hotline Complaint Files of
the Inspector General (18–10–04).
Proposed Regulations: The
Department proposes to claim an
exemption under section (k)(2) of the
Privacy Act for investigatory materials
that will be maintained in the ODAS.
Reasons: As authorized by section
(k)(2) of the Privacy Act and for the
reasons specified in this section, the
Secretary of Education proposes to
exempt investigatory material compiled
for law enforcement purposes in the
ODAS from the following provisions of
the Privacy Act and corresponding
Departmental regulations:
1. Section (c)(3) of the Privacy Act (5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3)) and 34 CFR 5b.9(c)(3)
require the Department to make an
accounting of disclosures from a system
of records available to the individual
named in the record at the individual’s
request. The Secretary proposes to
exempt the investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes
in the ODAS because if OIG made this
accounting available to a target
individual, it could impede or
compromise the OIG’s investigation
efforts by prematurely revealing its
existence and nature. In addition, if OIG
were to make this accounting available
to a target individual, the target could
compromise, interfere with, or make
witnesses reluctant to cooperate with
the OIG investigation, and this could
lead to the suppression, alteration, or
destruction of evidence.
2. Sections (d)(1) through (4) and (f)
of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1)
through (4) and (f)) and 34 CFR
5b.5(a)(1) and (c), 5b.7, and 5b.8 require
the Department to provide access to
records pertaining to an individual
requestor, to follow specific procedures
relating to requests for correction or
amendment of records, and to notify an
individual of the existence of records
pertaining to him or her upon request.
The Secretary proposes to exempt the
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes in the ODAS
from these requirements because
providing an individual with access to
investigative materials and permitting
the individual to contest the records’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:57 May 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
contents and to try to force changes to
the information contained therein could
interfere with and compromise the
ability of OIG to conduct an orderly and
unbiased investigation of potential
violations of laws, rules, and
regulations.
3. Section (e)(1) of the Privacy Act (5
U.S.C. 552a(e)(1)) and 34 CFR 5b.4(a)(1)
require the Department to maintain in
its records only ‘‘relevant and
necessary’’ information about an
individual. This provision is
inappropriate for OIG’s investigatory
duties because it is not always possible
to detect the relevance or necessity of
each piece of information reported to
the OIG or collected in the preliminary
phase of an investigation. In some cases,
it is only after the information is
evaluated in light of other evidence that
its relevance and necessity are clear. In
other cases, what may appear to be a
relevant and necessary piece of
information may become irrelevant in
light of further inquiry or investigation.
In order not to impede the OIG’s
investigation of potential violations of
laws, rules, and regulations, the
Secretary believes it is appropriate to
exempt the investigatory materials in
the ODAS from this requirement.
4. Section (e)(4)(G) and (H) of the
Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(G) and
(H)) require the Department to publish
notice of procedures for notification,
access, and correction of records in the
system. If the Department exempts the
investigatory materials in the ODAS
from the underlying Privacy Act
requirements, notification of these
requirements would be illogical. For
this reason, the Department proposes to
exempt the ODAS investigatory
materials from this requirement as well.
Executive Order 12866
1. Potential Costs and Benefits
Under Executive Order 12866, we
have assessed the potential costs and
benefits of this regulatory action. The
potential costs associated with the
proposed regulations are those resulting
from statutory requirements and those
we have determined to be necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this regulatory action,
we have determined that the benefits
would justify the costs.
Summary of Potential Costs and
Benefits
We do not view this proposed
regulatory action as imposing any new
costs as the Department is proposing
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
only to exempt itself from having to
meet limited Privacy Act requirements.
We view the potential benefits as
decreasing the risk that individual(s)
whose actions are being investigated
could interfere with or compromise the
ability of the OIG to conduct an orderly
and unbiased investigation of potential
violations of laws, rules, and
regulations.
2. Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866 and the
Presidential memorandum on ‘‘Plain
Language in Government Writing’’
require each agency to write regulations
that are easy to understand.
The Secretary invites comments on
how to make these proposed regulations
easier to understand, including answers
to questions such as the following:
• Are the requirements in the
proposed regulations clearly stated?
• Do the proposed regulations contain
technical terms or other wording that
interferes with their clarity?
• Does the format of the proposed
regulations (grouping and order of
sections, use of headings, paragraphing,
etc.) aid or reduce their clarity?
• Would the proposed regulations be
easier to understand if we divided them
into more (but shorter) sections? (A
‘‘section’’ is preceded by the symbol ‘‘§’’
and a numbered heading; for example,
§ 5b.11 Exempt systems.)
• Could the description of the
proposed regulations in the ‘‘Significant
Proposed Regulations’’ section be more
helpful in making the proposed
regulations easier to understand? If so,
how?
• What else could we do to make the
proposed regulations easier to
understand?
Send any comments that concern how
the Department could make these
proposed regulations easier to
understand to the person listed in the
ADDRESSES section.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these
regulations would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
These regulations involve procedural
rights of individuals under the Privacy
Act. Individuals are not considered to
be ‘‘entities’’ under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
These proposed regulations do not
contain any information collection
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Assessment of Educational Impact
The Secretary particularly requests
comments on whether these proposed
regulations would require transmission
of information that any other agency or
authority of the United States gathers or
makes available.
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number does not apply.)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 5b
Privacy.
Dated: May 2, 2008.
Michell Clark,
Assistant Secretary for Management.
For the reasons discussed herein, the
Department of Education proposes to
amend part 5b of title 34 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 5b—PRIVACY ACT
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 5b
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Section 5b.11 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(1) introductory
text to read as follows:
Exempt systems.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Specific systems of records
exempted under (k)(2). (1) The
Department exempts the Investigative
Files of the Inspector General ED/OIG
(18–10–01), the Hotline Complaint Files
of the Inspector General ED/OIG (18–
10–04), and the Office of Inspector
General Data Analytics System (ODAS)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:57 May 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
[FR Doc. E8–10110 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
Written comments must be
received on or before June 9, 2008.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2007–0648, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: videtich.callie@epa.gov and
mastrangelo.domenico@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Callie Videtich, Director, Air
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Callie Videtich,
Director, Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. Such
deliveries are only accepted Monday
through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:55 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays. Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules Section of this
Federal Register for detailed instruction
on how to submit comments.
ADDRESSES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Electronic Access to This Document
§ 5b.11
(18–10–02) from the following
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and this part
to the extent that these systems of
records consist of investigatory material
and complaints that may be included in
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes:
*
*
*
*
*
26059
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2007–0648; FRL–8563–5]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans; States of South
Dakota and Wyoming; Interstate
Transport of Pollution
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
State Implementation Plans (SIPs)
submitted by the States of South Dakota
and Wyoming that address interstate
transport with respect to the 1997 8hour ozone and fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. EPA has determined that the
Interstate Transport declarations
submitted by South Dakota on May 15,
2007, and by Wyoming on May 3, 2007,
satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air
Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) provisions,
also known as the ‘‘good neighbor’’
provisions, that a state SIP contain
adequate provisions prohibiting air
pollutant emissions from sources or
activities in the state from adversely
affecting another state. This action is
being taken under section 110 of the
Clean Air Act.
In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register, EPA is
approving the States’ SIP revisions as a
direct final rule without prior proposal
because the Agency views these as noncontroversial SIP revisions and
anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set
forth in the preamble to the direct final
rule. If EPA receives no adverse
comments, EPA will not take further
action on this proposed rule. If EPA
receives adverse comments, EPA will
withdraw the direct final rule and it will
not take effect. EPA will address all
public comments in a subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. Please note that if EPA
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Domenico Mastrangelo, Air Program,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202–
1129, (303) 312–6436,
mastrangelo.domenico@epa.gov.
See the
information provided in the Direct Final
action of the same title which is located
in the Rules and Regulations section of
this Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 23, 2008.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. E8–10100 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 90 (Thursday, May 8, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26056-26059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10110]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 5b
[Docket ID ED-2008-OM-0004]
RIN 1880-AA85
Privacy Act Regulations
AGENCY: Office of Management, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) proposes to amend its
regulations implementing the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (Privacy
Act). These proposed regulations would amend the Department's current
Privacy Act regulations to exempt from certain Privacy Act requirements
investigative material in a new system of records to be maintained by
the Department that will be known as the Office of Inspector General
Data Analytics System (ODAS) (18-10-02). Specifically, the exemption
would apply to materials compiled by the Department's Office of
Inspector General (OIG) for law enforcement purposes to identify
internal control weaknesses and system issues and to improve methods of
data modeling and
[[Page 26057]]
annual audit planning in order to detect and investigate fraud, waste,
and mismanagement in Department programs and operations.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before June 9, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. We will not
accept comments by fax or by e-mail. Please submit your comments only
one time, in order to ensure that we do not receive duplicate copies.
In addition, please include the Docket ID at the top of your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov to submit your comments electronically. Information
on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing agency
documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket, is available on
the site under ``How To Use This Site.''
Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or Hand Delivery. If you
mail or deliver your comments about these proposed regulations, address
them to Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of
Management, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 8166, Washington, DC 20202-5920. Attention: NOPR Comments.
Privacy Note: The Department's policy for comments received from
members of the public (including those comments submitted by mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery) is to make these submissions
available for public viewing in their entirety on the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters
should be careful to include in their comments only information that
they wish to make publicly available on the Internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelley Shepherd, Office of Inspector
General, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room
8166, Washington, DC 20202-5920. Telephone: (202) 245-7077.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding these proposed
regulations. We also invite you to assist us in complying with the
specific requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall
requirement of reducing regulatory burden that might result from these
proposed regulations. Please let us know of any further opportunities
we should take to reduce potential costs or increase potential benefits
while preserving the effective and efficient administration of the
program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about these proposed regulations by accessing Regulations.gov.
You may also inspect the comments, in person, at the National Library
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202, between
the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday
of each week except Federal holidays. For more information on
inspecting public comments call (202) 205-4410.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid to an individual with
a disability who needs assistance to review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking record for these proposed
regulations. If you want to schedule an appointment for this type of
aid, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Background
Under the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (5 U.S.C.
Appendix) Inspectors General, including the Department's Inspector
General (OIG), are responsible for conducting, supervising, and
coordinating audits and investigations relating to programs and
operations of the Federal agency for which their office is established.
The Department intends to establish a new system of records entitled
the ``Office of Inspector General Data Analytics System'' (ODAS) (18-
10-02) in order to facilitate the OIG's performance of this statutory
duty.
The new system of records will be managed by the OIG's Information
Technology Audits and Computer Crimes Investigations (ITACCI) division,
which is responsible for providing computer programming, data
acquisition and analysis and statistical modeling in support of OIG
operations. ITACCI will use this new system of records to gather data
from Department systems and analyze them using data modeling techniques
to detect waste, fraud, abuse, and internal control weaknesses and to
identify potential violations of laws, rules and regulations. These
data will include information related to transactions between the
Department and individuals and entities that have applied for and/or
received grants, contracts, loans, or payments from the Department.
ITACCI will conduct data modeling on these data, using statistical and
mathematical techniques, in order to predict anomalies indicating
fraudulent activity and to predict which transactions have a high
probability of fraudulent activity.
ITACCI will review this information to determine whether further
action is warranted. If so, ITACCI will refer potential violations of
law, rules, or regulations that it identifies to other divisions of OIG
for investigation, audit, or inspection, as appropriate. Thus, the ODAS
will contain data related to transactions with the Department, as well
as information related to ITACCI's review and investigation of that
data for law enforcement purposes.
Pursuant to section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), the
Secretary, through rulemaking, may exempt from a limited number of
Privacy Act requirements a system of records that contains
investigatory materials compiled for law enforcement purposes. The
investigatory materials in the ODAS will fall within the scope of
section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act because the system will consist of
investigatory materials compiled for purposes of enforcing Federal
legal requirements applicable to individuals and entities receiving
Department funds.
Significant Proposed Regulations
Exempt Systems (Sec. 5b.11(c))
Statute: Section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act provides that the head
of any agency may promulgate rules to exempt any system of records from
the requirements in sections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and
(I), and (f) of the Privacy Act if the system of records contains
investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes other than
material related to criminal subjects and investigations that is within
the scope of section (j)(2) of the Privacy Act. Section (k)(2)
provides, however, that, in the event that any individual is denied any
right, privilege, or benefit that the individual would otherwise be
entitled to by Federal law, or for which the individual would otherwise
be eligible, as a result of the maintenance of the material, the
material must be provided to the individual, unless the disclosure of
such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished the
information to the Department under an express
[[Page 26058]]
promise, or, prior to September 27, 1975, an implied promise that the
identity of the source would be held in confidence.
Current Regulations: The Department does not currently claim any
exemption under section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act for the investigatory
materials that will be maintained in the ODAS. However, the Department
claims exemptions under this section for two other OIG systems of
records--the Investigative Files of the Inspector General (18-10-01)
and the Hotline Complaint Files of the Inspector General (18-10-04).
Proposed Regulations: The Department proposes to claim an exemption
under section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act for investigatory materials
that will be maintained in the ODAS.
Reasons: As authorized by section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act and for
the reasons specified in this section, the Secretary of Education
proposes to exempt investigatory material compiled for law enforcement
purposes in the ODAS from the following provisions of the Privacy Act
and corresponding Departmental regulations:
1. Section (c)(3) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3)) and 34
CFR 5b.9(c)(3) require the Department to make an accounting of
disclosures from a system of records available to the individual named
in the record at the individual's request. The Secretary proposes to
exempt the investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes
in the ODAS because if OIG made this accounting available to a target
individual, it could impede or compromise the OIG's investigation
efforts by prematurely revealing its existence and nature. In addition,
if OIG were to make this accounting available to a target individual,
the target could compromise, interfere with, or make witnesses
reluctant to cooperate with the OIG investigation, and this could lead
to the suppression, alteration, or destruction of evidence.
2. Sections (d)(1) through (4) and (f) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C.
552a(d)(1) through (4) and (f)) and 34 CFR 5b.5(a)(1) and (c), 5b.7,
and 5b.8 require the Department to provide access to records pertaining
to an individual requestor, to follow specific procedures relating to
requests for correction or amendment of records, and to notify an
individual of the existence of records pertaining to him or her upon
request. The Secretary proposes to exempt the investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes in the ODAS from these
requirements because providing an individual with access to
investigative materials and permitting the individual to contest the
records' contents and to try to force changes to the information
contained therein could interfere with and compromise the ability of
OIG to conduct an orderly and unbiased investigation of potential
violations of laws, rules, and regulations.
3. Section (e)(1) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1)) and 34
CFR 5b.4(a)(1) require the Department to maintain in its records only
``relevant and necessary'' information about an individual. This
provision is inappropriate for OIG's investigatory duties because it is
not always possible to detect the relevance or necessity of each piece
of information reported to the OIG or collected in the preliminary
phase of an investigation. In some cases, it is only after the
information is evaluated in light of other evidence that its relevance
and necessity are clear. In other cases, what may appear to be a
relevant and necessary piece of information may become irrelevant in
light of further inquiry or investigation. In order not to impede the
OIG's investigation of potential violations of laws, rules, and
regulations, the Secretary believes it is appropriate to exempt the
investigatory materials in the ODAS from this requirement.
4. Section (e)(4)(G) and (H) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C.
552a(e)(4)(G) and (H)) require the Department to publish notice of
procedures for notification, access, and correction of records in the
system. If the Department exempts the investigatory materials in the
ODAS from the underlying Privacy Act requirements, notification of
these requirements would be illogical. For this reason, the Department
proposes to exempt the ODAS investigatory materials from this
requirement as well.
Executive Order 12866
1. Potential Costs and Benefits
Under Executive Order 12866, we have assessed the potential costs
and benefits of this regulatory action. The potential costs associated
with the proposed regulations are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have determined to be necessary for
administering this program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this regulatory action, we have determined that the
benefits would justify the costs.
Summary of Potential Costs and Benefits
We do not view this proposed regulatory action as imposing any new
costs as the Department is proposing only to exempt itself from having
to meet limited Privacy Act requirements. We view the potential
benefits as decreasing the risk that individual(s) whose actions are
being investigated could interfere with or compromise the ability of
the OIG to conduct an orderly and unbiased investigation of potential
violations of laws, rules, and regulations.
2. Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866 and the Presidential memorandum on ``Plain
Language in Government Writing'' require each agency to write
regulations that are easy to understand.
The Secretary invites comments on how to make these proposed
regulations easier to understand, including answers to questions such
as the following:
Are the requirements in the proposed regulations clearly
stated?
Do the proposed regulations contain technical terms or
other wording that interferes with their clarity?
Does the format of the proposed regulations (grouping and
order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce
their clarity?
Would the proposed regulations be easier to understand if
we divided them into more (but shorter) sections? (A ``section'' is
preceded by the symbol ``Sec. '' and a numbered heading; for example,
Sec. 5b.11 Exempt systems.)
Could the description of the proposed regulations in the
``Significant Proposed Regulations'' section be more helpful in making
the proposed regulations easier to understand? If so, how?
What else could we do to make the proposed regulations
easier to understand?
Send any comments that concern how the Department could make these
proposed regulations easier to understand to the person listed in the
ADDRESSES section.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these regulations would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
These regulations involve procedural rights of individuals under
the Privacy Act. Individuals are not considered to be ``entities''
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
These proposed regulations do not contain any information
collection requirements.
[[Page 26059]]
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Assessment of Educational Impact
The Secretary particularly requests comments on whether these
proposed regulations would require transmission of information that any
other agency or authority of the United States gathers or makes
available.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number does not apply.)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 5b
Privacy.
Dated: May 2, 2008.
Michell Clark,
Assistant Secretary for Management.
For the reasons discussed herein, the Department of Education
proposes to amend part 5b of title 34 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 5b--PRIVACY ACT REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 5b continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Section 5b.11 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(1)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 5b.11 Exempt systems.
* * * * *
(c) Specific systems of records exempted under (k)(2). (1) The
Department exempts the Investigative Files of the Inspector General ED/
OIG (18-10-01), the Hotline Complaint Files of the Inspector General
ED/OIG (18-10-04), and the Office of Inspector General Data Analytics
System (ODAS) (18-10-02) from the following provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a
and this part to the extent that these systems of records consist of
investigatory material and complaints that may be included in
investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes:
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-10110 Filed 5-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P