In the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding, 25768-25769 [E8-9984]

Download as PDF 25768 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 7, 2008 / Notices Dated: April 18, 2008. Carl J. Artman, Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. [FR Doc. E8–10064 Filed 5–6–08; 8:45 am] Sec. 4, lots 11, 12, 13, 14, N1⁄2SW1⁄4, SW1⁄4SW1⁄4, and NW1⁄4SE1⁄4; Sec. 5, E1⁄2SE1⁄4; Sec. 6, lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10; Sec. 7, lot 4, SE1⁄4SW1⁄4, and SE1⁄4; Sec. 8, NW1⁄4SW1⁄4, SE1⁄4SW1⁄4, and SE1⁄4; Sec. 9, N1⁄2N1⁄2, S1⁄2NE1⁄4, SW1⁄4NW1⁄4, and S1⁄2 BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [UT–060–08–1430–EQ; UTU–81536] Notice of Realty Action; Re-Issuance; Noncompetitive Lease of Public Land; Grand County, Utah Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Realty Action; Reissuance. AGENCY: sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES SUMMARY: This notice announces the reissuance of the Notice of Realty Action published in the Federal Register on March 14, 2006 and cancelled by notice published on July 21, 2006. DATES: Interested parties may submit comments to the BLM Acting Moab Field Manager, at the address below. Comments must be received by not later than June 23, 2008. Only written comments will be accepted. ADDRESSES: Address all written comments concerning this notice to the BLM Acting Moab Field Manager, 82 East Dogwood Avenue, Moab, Utah 84532. Please send e-mail comments to the following address: momail@ut.blm.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary von Koch, Realty Specialist, Moab Field Office, 435–259–2128. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The decision to cancel the Notice of Realty Action was based on the comments received during the 45-day comment period. Since July of 2006, all the impediments that led to the cancellation of the Notice of Realty Action have been removed. BLM has determined that the following 2,808.67 acres of isolated public lands in Grand County, Utah, are suitable for lease pursuant to Section 302 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA) (90 Stat. 2762; 43 U.S.C. 1732) using noncompetitive (direct) lease procedures. Salt Lake Meridian T. 20 S., R. 16 E., Sec. 25, S1⁄2; Sec. 26, SW1⁄4SW1⁄4, E1⁄2SW1⁄4, and SE1⁄4; Sec. 27, SE1⁄4SE1⁄4; Sec. 28, E1⁄2SE1⁄4; Sec. 34, W1⁄2NW1⁄4. T. 21 S., R. 16 E., Sec. 1, lots 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, and 16. T. 21 S., R. 17 E., VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:00 May 06, 2008 Jkt 214001 Green River Farms, a domestic corporation, has proposed to file with BLM an application to lease the above public lands, located near Green River, Utah. The lands would be used, occupied and developed as a commercial agricultural farm in conjunction with adjoining private lands owned by Green River Farms and lands leased to Green River Farms by the State of Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration. After review, the BLM has determined that the proposed use of the above described parcels is in conformance with the Grand Resource Area Resource Management Plan, and that the above described land is available for that use. Therefore, pursuant to section 302(b) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1732(b)) and the implementing regulations at 43 CFR part 2920, the BLM will accept for processing an application to be filed by Green River Farms, or its duly qualified designee, for a non-competitive lease of the above described lands, to be used, occupied, and developed as stated above. A noncompetitive lease may be employed in this case because all of the subject tracts of public land are adjacent to lands of the same proposed farming project. A detailed description of the negotiated, non-competitive process was provided in the original notice. On or before June 23, 2008, interested parties may submit comments to the BLM at the address stated above with respect to: (1) The decision of the BLM regarding the availability of the lands described herein and (2) The decision of the BLM to accept for processing an application from Green River Farms for a noncompetitive lease. Facsimiles, telephone calls, and electronic mails are unacceptable means of notification. Comments including names and street addresses of respondents will be available for public review at the BLM Moab Field Office during regular business hours, except holidays. Individual respondents may request confidentiality. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Any adverse comments will be reviewed by the BLM Utah State Director, who may sustain, vacate or modify this realty action. In the absence of any objections, or adverse comments, the proposed realty action will become the final determination of the Department of the Interior. Authority: 43 CFR 2920.4. Dated: April 30, 2008. Selma Sierra, State Director. [FR Doc. E8–10051 Filed 5–6–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–565 Consolidated Enforcement Proceeding] In the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has instituted a formal enforcement proceeding relating to exclusion orders and cease and desist orders issued at the conclusion of the above-captioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Haldenstein, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3041. Copies of all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 7, 2008 / Notices the matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 23, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Epson Portland, Inc. of Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of California; and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan (collectively ‘‘Epson’’). 71 FR 14720 (March 23, 2006). The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘section 337’’) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain ink cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,615,957; claims 18, 81, 93, 149, 164 and 165 of U.S. Patent No. 5,622,439; claims 83 and 84 of U.S. Patent No. 5,158,377; claims 19 and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 5,221,148; claims 29, 31, 34 and 38 of U.S. Patent No. 5,156,472; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,488,401; claims 1–3 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,502,917; claims 1, 31 and 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,550,902; claims 1, 10 and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,955,422; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 7,008,053; and claims 21, 45, 53 and 54 of U.S. Patent No. 7,011,397. The complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants requested that the Commission issue a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The Commission named as respondents 24 companies located in China, Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Several respondents were terminated from the investigation on the basis of settlement agreements or consent orders or were found in default. On March 30, 2007, the presiding ALJ (Judge Luckern) issued a final ID in the investigation finding a violation of section 337 with respect to certain respondents. He found the asserted claims valid and infringement by certain respondents’ products. He recommended issuance of a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders directed to certain respondents and bond in the amount of $13.60 per cartridge during the Presidential review period. On October, 19, 2007, after review, the Commission made its final determination in the investigation, finding a violation of section 337. The Commission issued a general exclusion order, limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders directed to several domestic respondents. The Commission also determined that the VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:00 May 06, 2008 Jkt 214001 public interest factors enumerated in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f), and (g) did not preclude issuance of the aforementioned remedial orders, and that the bond during the Presidential review period would be $13.60 per cartridge for covered ink cartridges. On February 8, 2008, complainant Epson filed two complaints seeking enforcement proceedings under Commission Rule 210.75. One complaint alleges that Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd.; Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd.; and Town Sky Inc. have violated the general exclusion order and that Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd. and Town Sky Inc. have violated the cease and desist orders directed to them. Epson’s second complaint alleges that Mipo International Ltd. and Mipo America, Ltd. have violated the general and limited exclusion orders and that Mipo America, Ltd. has violated the cease and desist order directed to it. Having examined the complaints seeking a formal enforcement proceeding, and having found that the complaints comply with the requirements for institution of a formal enforcement proceeding contained in Commission rule 210.75, the Commission has determined to institute a consolidated formal enforcement proceeding to determine whether the five respondents are in violation of the Commission’s exclusion orders and cease and desist orders issued in the investigation, and what, if any, enforcement measures are appropriate. The following entities are named as parties to the formal enforcement proceeding: (1) Complainant Epson, (2) respondents (Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd.; Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd.; Town Sky Inc.; Mipo America Ltd., and Mipo International, Ltd.) and (3) a Commission investigative attorney to be designated by the Director, Office of Unfair Import Investigations. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.75 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.75). Issued: May 1, 2008. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–9984 Filed 5–6–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00129 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 25769 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [OMB Number 1117–0010] Agency Information Collection Activities 30-day notice of information collection under review. ACTION: Proposed collection; comments requested: U.S. Official Order Forms for Schedule I and II Controlled Substances (Accountable Forms), Order Form Requisition—DEA Form 222 and 222a The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 73, Number 42, page 11443 on March 3, 2008, allowing for a 60 day comment period. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days for public comment until June 6, 2008. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503. Additionally, comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 395–5806. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25768-25769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9984]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-565 Consolidated Enforcement Proceeding]


In the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; 
Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has instituted a formal enforcement proceeding relating to 
exclusion orders and cease and desist orders issued at the conclusion 
of the above-captioned investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Haldenstein, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3041. Copies of all 
nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov/. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on

[[Page 25769]]

the matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 23, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Epson Portland, Inc. 
of Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of California; and Seiko Epson 
Corporation of Japan (collectively ``Epson''). 71 FR 14720 (March 23, 
2006). The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930 (``section 337'') in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain ink cartridges and components 
thereof by reason of infringement of claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,615,957; claims 18, 81, 93, 149, 164 and 165 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,622,439; claims 83 and 84 of U.S. Patent No. 5,158,377; claims 19 and 
20 of U.S. Patent No. 5,221,148; claims 29, 31, 34 and 38 of U.S. 
Patent No. 5,156,472; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,488,401; claims 1-3 
and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,502,917; claims 1, 31 and 34 of U.S. Patent 
No. 6,550,902; claims 1, 10 and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,955,422; claim 
1 of U.S. Patent No. 7,008,053; and claims 21, 45, 53 and 54 of U.S. 
Patent No. 7,011,397. The complaint further alleged that an industry in 
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 
337. The complainants requested that the Commission issue a general 
exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The Commission named as 
respondents 24 companies located in China, Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, 
and the United States. Several respondents were terminated from the 
investigation on the basis of settlement agreements or consent orders 
or were found in default.
    On March 30, 2007, the presiding ALJ (Judge Luckern) issued a final 
ID in the investigation finding a violation of section 337 with respect 
to certain respondents. He found the asserted claims valid and 
infringement by certain respondents' products. He recommended issuance 
of a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders directed to 
certain respondents and bond in the amount of $13.60 per cartridge 
during the Presidential review period.
    On October, 19, 2007, after review, the Commission made its final 
determination in the investigation, finding a violation of section 337. 
The Commission issued a general exclusion order, limited exclusion 
order, and cease and desist orders directed to several domestic 
respondents. The Commission also determined that the public interest 
factors enumerated in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f), and (g) did not preclude 
issuance of the aforementioned remedial orders, and that the bond 
during the Presidential review period would be $13.60 per cartridge for 
covered ink cartridges.
    On February 8, 2008, complainant Epson filed two complaints seeking 
enforcement proceedings under Commission Rule 210.75. One complaint 
alleges that Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd.; Ninestar Technology 
Company, Ltd.; and Town Sky Inc. have violated the general exclusion 
order and that Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd. and Town Sky Inc. have 
violated the cease and desist orders directed to them. Epson's second 
complaint alleges that Mipo International Ltd. and Mipo America, Ltd. 
have violated the general and limited exclusion orders and that Mipo 
America, Ltd. has violated the cease and desist order directed to it.
    Having examined the complaints seeking a formal enforcement 
proceeding, and having found that the complaints comply with the 
requirements for institution of a formal enforcement proceeding 
contained in Commission rule 210.75, the Commission has determined to 
institute a consolidated formal enforcement proceeding to determine 
whether the five respondents are in violation of the Commission's 
exclusion orders and cease and desist orders issued in the 
investigation, and what, if any, enforcement measures are appropriate. 
The following entities are named as parties to the formal enforcement 
proceeding: (1) Complainant Epson, (2) respondents (Ninestar Technology 
Co., Ltd.; Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd.; Town Sky Inc.; Mipo 
America Ltd., and Mipo International, Ltd.) and (3) a Commission 
investigative attorney to be designated by the Director, Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.75 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.75).

    Issued: May 1, 2008.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E8-9984 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P