Richloom Home Fashions, Division of Richloom Fabrics Corporation, Clinton, SC; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 25773 [E8-10030]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 7, 2008 / Notices
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974,
and are also eligible to apply for alternative
trade adjustment assistance under Section
246 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’
Signed at Washington, DC this 28th day of
April 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–10033 Filed 5–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,629; TA–W–62,629A]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Giant Merchandising, Inc., Including
On-Site Leased Workers From Priority
Temporary Services, Partners In
Diversity and Apple One Commerce,
CA; Including An Employee in Support
of Giant Merchandising, Inc.,
Commerce, CA Operating Out of
Rochester, MN; Amended Certification
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on January 28,
2008, applicable to workers of Giant
Merchandising, Inc., including on-site
leased workers from Priority Temporary
Services, Partners In Diversity and
Apple One, Commerce, California. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2008 (73 FR
8369).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm.
New information shows that a worker
separation (Mr. Halton Hamer) has
occurred involving an employee in
support of and under the control of the
Commerce, California facility of Giant
Merchandising, Inc. operating out of
Rochester, Minnesota.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include an employee in
support of the Commerce, California
facility operating out of Rochester,
Minnesota.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Giant Merchandising, Inc., Commerce,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:00 May 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
California who were adversely affected
by a shift in production of screen
printed apparel to Mexico.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–62,629 is hereby issued as
follows:
‘‘All workers of Giant Merchandising, Inc.,
including on-site leased workers from
Priority Temporary Services, Partners In
Diversity, and Apple One, Commerce,
California (TA–W–62,629), including an
employee in support of Giant Merchandising,
Inc., Commerce, California operating out of
Rochester, Minnesota (TA–W–62,629A), who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after December 10, 2006,
through January 28, 2010, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.’’
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
April 2008.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–10029 Filed 5–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,659]
Richloom Home Fashions, Division of
Richloom Fabrics Corporation, Clinton,
SC; Notice of Negative Determination
on Reconsideration
On March 27, 2008, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of the subject firm. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on April 24, 2008 (73 FR
22166).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
finding that worker group does not
produce an article within the meaning
of section 222 for the Trade Act of 1974.
In the request for reconsideration the
petitioner stated that workers of the
Sample Department of the subject firm
produce samples of window treatments
and bed coverings and requested that
the Department conduct further
investigation of the Sample Department.
On reconsideration, the Department
contacted a company official and
requested additional information
regarding the production of samples of
window treatments and bed coverings.
The investigation revealed that workers
of the Sample Department, Richloom
Home Fashions in Clinton, South
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25773
Carolina manufacture samples of
window treatments and bed coverings.
However, the investigation also revealed
that only one worker was separated
from the Sample Department in 2007
and there was no threat of future
separations.
The subject company did not separate
or threaten to separate a significant
number or proportion of workers, as
required by section 222 of the Trade Act
of 1974. Significant number or
proportion of the workers in a firm or
appropriate subdivision means at least
three workers in a workforce of fewer
than 50 workers, five percent of the
workers in a workforce of over 50
workers, or at least 50 workers. As
employment levels at the subject facility
did not decline during the relevant time
period and there was no threat of
separations during the relevant period,
criterion (1) has not been met.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of
Richloom Home Fashions, division of
Richloom Fabrics Corporation, Clinton,
South Carolina.
Signed at Washington, DC this 28th day of
April, 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–10030 Filed 5–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,927]
Chase Home Finance LLC, A Division
of JP Morgan Chase & Co., Lexington,
Kentucky; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated April 17, 2008,
a petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The denial notice was signed on March
17, 2008 and published in the Federal
Register on April 24, 2008 (73 FR
22170).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10030]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-62,659]
Richloom Home Fashions, Division of Richloom Fabrics Corporation,
Clinton, SC; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration
On March 27, 2008, the Department issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers
and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the
Federal Register on April 24, 2008 (73 FR 22166).
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the finding that worker group does not produce an article
within the meaning of section 222 for the Trade Act of 1974.
In the request for reconsideration the petitioner stated that
workers of the Sample Department of the subject firm produce samples of
window treatments and bed coverings and requested that the Department
conduct further investigation of the Sample Department.
On reconsideration, the Department contacted a company official and
requested additional information regarding the production of samples of
window treatments and bed coverings. The investigation revealed that
workers of the Sample Department, Richloom Home Fashions in Clinton,
South Carolina manufacture samples of window treatments and bed
coverings. However, the investigation also revealed that only one
worker was separated from the Sample Department in 2007 and there was
no threat of future separations.
The subject company did not separate or threaten to separate a
significant number or proportion of workers, as required by section 222
of the Trade Act of 1974. Significant number or proportion of the
workers in a firm or appropriate subdivision means at least three
workers in a workforce of fewer than 50 workers, five percent of the
workers in a workforce of over 50 workers, or at least 50 workers. As
employment levels at the subject facility did not decline during the
relevant time period and there was no threat of separations during the
relevant period, criterion (1) has not been met.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of Richloom Home Fashions, division of
Richloom Fabrics Corporation, Clinton, South Carolina.
Signed at Washington, DC this 28th day of April, 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-10030 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
