Honey from Argentina: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Determination Not to Revoke in Part, 24220-24222 [E8-9729]

Download as PDF 24220 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Notices 245-day period to issue its preliminary results to up to 365 days. We determine that completion of the preliminary results of this review within the 245-day period is not practicable for the following reasons. One respondent has complex affiliation issues which require the Department to gather and analyze a significant amount of information associated with affiliation and the companies’ sales practices and manufacturing costs. In addition, domestic interested parties have raised other issues which require the collection of additional information. Given the number and complexity of issues in this case and the Department’s resource constraints, and in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are fully extending the time period for issuing the preliminary results of review. Therefore, the preliminary results are now due no later than September 29, 2008. The final results continue to be due 120 days after publication of the preliminary results. This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: April 24, 2008. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E8–9722 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–816] Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Time Limits for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Robinson, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3797. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Background On September 25, 2007, the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published a notice of initiation of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:17 May 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 products from the Republic of Korea, covering the period August 1, 2006 to July 31, 2007. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 72 FR 54428 (September 25, 2007). The preliminary results of this review are currently due no later than May 2, 2008. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary Results Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 28, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published its preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on honey from Argentina. See Honey from Argentina: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Intent Not to Revoke in Part, 72 FR 73758 (December 28, 2007) (Preliminary Results). This administrative review covers five firms, two of which were selected as mandatory respondents, Asociacion de Cooperativas Argentinas (ACA) and Seylinco, S.A. (Seylinco). Based on our analysis of comments received, the margins for the final results do not differ from the preliminary results. See Preliminary Results. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maryanne Burke for Seylinco, Deborah Scott for ACA or Robert James, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5604, (202) 482–2657 or (202) 482–0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), requires that the Department make a preliminary determination within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further states that if it is not practicable to complete the review within the time period specified, the administering authority may extend the 245-day period to issue its preliminary results to up to 365 days. We determine that completion of the preliminary results of this review within the 245-day period is not practicable for the following reasons. This review covers four companies and one of the companies has requested revocation of the antidumping duty order in part, which requires the Department to gather and analyze a significant amount of information pertaining to the company’s sales practices, manufacturing costs and corporate relationships. For the company which has requested partial revocation, the Department needs to conduct further analyses on, among other issues, commercial quantity and whether the evidence supports its claim of absence of dumping. Given the number and complexity of issues in this case, and in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are fully extending the time period for issuing the preliminary results of review. Therefore, the preliminary results are now due no later than September 2, 2008, the next business day after 365 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the order. The final results continue to be due 120 days after publication of the preliminary results. This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: April 24, 2008. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E8–9725 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 International Trade Administration [A–357–812] Honey from Argentina: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Determination Not to Revoke in Part AGENCY: Background On December 28, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on honey from Argentina for the period December 1, 2005 to November 30, 2006. See Preliminary Results. In response to the Department’s invitation to comment on the Preliminary Results, the American Honey Producers Association and the Sioux Honey Association (collectively, petitioners) and respondents ACA and Seylinco filed their case briefs on January 28, 2008. Petitioners and ACA submitted their rebuttal briefs on February 4, 2008. Period of Review The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2005, to November 30, 2006. E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Notices Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is honey from Argentina. The products covered are natural honey, artificial honey containing more than 50 percent natural honey by weight, preparations of natural honey containing more than 50 percent natural honey by weight, and flavored honey. The subject merchandise includes all grades and colors of honey whether in liquid, creamed, comb, cut comb, or chunk form, and whether packaged for retail or in bulk form. The merchandise is currently classifiable under subheadings 0409.00.00, 1702.90.90, and 2106.90.99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes, the Department’s written description of the merchandise under this order is dispositive. Determination Not to Revoke in Part As discussed in the Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 73760, Seylinco requested that the Department revoke the order in regard to Seylinco pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222 based on three consecutive zero margins. We preliminarily determined not to revoke the order with respect to Seylinco because it did not ship in commercial quantities during each of the three years forming the basis of its request. See id. For these final results, the Department has relied upon Seylinco’s sales activity during the 2003–2004, 2004–2005, and 2005–2006 PORs in making its decision with respect to Seylinco’s revocation request. Although Seylinco had three consecutive years of sales at not less than normal value (NV), Seylinco did not sell subject merchandise in commercial quantities in each of these three years forming the basis of the request for revocation. Thus, Seylinco is not eligible for revocation pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(d)(1). Accordingly, we have determined not to revoke the antidumping duty order with respect to Seylinco. See Comment 5 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (Issues and Decision Memorandum) accompanying this notice. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:17 May 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is on file in the CRU and can be accessed directly on the web at https://www.ita.doc.gov/. 24221 Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit Changes Since the Preliminary Results requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this Based on our analysis of comments administrative review for all shipments received we have made two changes to of the subject merchandise entered, or the margin calculation for ACA. First, withdrawn from warehouse, for we converted the average cost of consumption on or after the publication production calculated for ACA’s date, consistent with section 751(a)(1) of beekeepers from a per–kilogram to a per–metric ton basis. Second, we added the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ACA’s reported homogenization costs to Tariff Act): (1) cash deposit rate for ACA, Seylinco, Patagonik S.A., El Mana the average cost of production. These changes in the calculation did not result S.A. and Naiman S.A. will be zero; (2) if the exporter is not a firm covered in in a change in the final margin. We this review, but was covered in a made no changes to the margin previous review or the original less than calculation for Seylinco. fair value (LTFV) investigation, the cash Final Results of Review deposit rate will continue to be the company–specific rate published for the We determine that the following most recent period; (3) if the exporter is dumping margins exist for the period not a firm covered in this review, a prior December 1, 2005 through November review, or the original LTFV 30, 2006. investigation, but the manufacturer is, Weighted Average the cash deposit rate will be the rate Manufacturer / Exporter Margin established for the most recent period (percentage) for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the ACA .............................. 0.00 exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm Seylinco ........................ 0.00 Patagonik S.A. .............. 0.00 covered in this or any previous review El Mana, S.A. ............... 0.00 conducted by the Department, the cash Naiman S.A .................. 0.00 deposit rate will continue to be 30.24 percent, which is the all–others rate established in the LTFV investigation. Assessment See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; The Department shall determine, and Honey From Argentina, 66 FR 63672 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (December 10, 2001). These deposit (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties requirements, when imposed, shall on all appropriate entries. In accordance remain in effect until publication of the with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have final results of the next administrative calculated duty assessment rates which review. will be applied uniformly on all ACA, Notification to Interested Parties Seylinco, Patagonik S.A., El Mana S.A. and Naiman S.A. entries made during This notice also serves as a final the POR. The Department intends to reminder to importers of their issue assessment instructions directly to responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) CBP 15 days after the date of to file a certificate regarding the publication of these final results of reimbursement of antidumping duties review. We will direct CBP to liquidate prior to liquidation of the relevant without regard to antidumping duties. entries during this review period. The Department clarified its Failure to comply with this requirement automatic assessment regulation on May could result in the Secretary’s 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This clarification presumption that reimbursement of will apply to entries of subject antidumping duties occurred and the merchandise during the POR produced subsequent assessment of doubled by companies included in these final antidumping duties. results of review for which the reviewed This notice also serves as a reminder companies did not know their to parties subject to administrative merchandise was destined for the protective orders (APO) of their United States. In such instances, we will responsibility concerning the return or instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed destruction of proprietary information entries at the all–others rate if there is disclosed under APO in accordance no rate for the intermediate with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues company(ies) involved in the to govern business proprietary transaction. For a full discussion of this information in this segment of the clarification, see Antidumping and proceeding. Timely written notification Countervailing Duty Proceedings: of the return/destruction of APO PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1 24222 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Notices materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation, which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act. Dated: April 28, 2008. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix - List of Comments in the Issues and Decision Memorandum ACA Comment 1. Reclassification of ACA’s Reported Testing and Homogenization Expenses Comment 2. Date of Sale and Selection of the United Kingdom as the Third– Country Market Comment 3. Whether Sales to the United Kingdom Are Representative Comment 4. Issues Related to the Cost of Production Seylinco Comment 5. Revocation [FR Doc. E8–9729 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five–year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce SUMMARY: In accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is automatically initiating a five–year review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the antidumping duty order listed below. The International Trade Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five–year Review which covers the same order. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of AGENCY: The Department’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five– year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to the Department’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in the Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3 – Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five–year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998). Initiation of Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Review of the following antidumping duty order: DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Department Contact A–570–877 ................................................. 731–TA–1010 PRC Lawn and Garden Steel Fence Posts Andrea Berton (202) 482–4037 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to Sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Department’s regulations, the Department’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on the Department’s sunset Internet Web site at the following address: ‘‘https://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.’’ All submissions in this Sunset Review must be filed in accordance with the Department’s regulations regarding format, translation, service, and certification of documents. These rules can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and make available a service list for this proceeding. To facilitate the timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:34 May 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties to apply for access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately following publication in the Federal Register of the notice of initiation of the sunset review. The Department’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Information Required from Interested Parties Domestic interested parties (defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) wishing to participate in this Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the Department’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, the Department will automatically revoke the order without further review. See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). If we receive an order–specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, the Department’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order–specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that the Department’s information requirements are distinct from the Commission’s information requirements. Please consult the Department’s regulations for information regarding the Department’s E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 86 (Friday, May 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24220-24222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-357-812]


Honey from Argentina: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and Determination Not to Revoke in Part

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 28, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published its preliminary results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on honey from Argentina. See Honey 
from Argentina: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and Intent Not to Revoke in Part, 72 FR 73758 (December 28, 
2007) (Preliminary Results). This administrative review covers five 
firms, two of which were selected as mandatory respondents, Asociacion 
de Cooperativas Argentinas (ACA) and Seylinco, S.A. (Seylinco). Based 
on our analysis of comments received, the margins for the final results 
do not differ from the preliminary results. See Preliminary Results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maryanne Burke for Seylinco, Deborah 
Scott for ACA or Robert James, Office 7, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-5604, (202) 482-2657 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 28, 2007, the Department published in the Federal 
Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on honey from Argentina for the period December 
1, 2005 to November 30, 2006. See Preliminary Results. In response to 
the Department's invitation to comment on the Preliminary Results, the 
American Honey Producers Association and the Sioux Honey Association 
(collectively, petitioners) and respondents ACA and Seylinco filed 
their case briefs on January 28, 2008. Petitioners and ACA submitted 
their rebuttal briefs on February 4, 2008.

Period of Review

    The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2005, to November 30, 
2006.

[[Page 24221]]

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is honey from Argentina. The 
products covered are natural honey, artificial honey containing more 
than 50 percent natural honey by weight, preparations of natural honey 
containing more than 50 percent natural honey by weight, and flavored 
honey. The subject merchandise includes all grades and colors of honey 
whether in liquid, creamed, comb, cut comb, or chunk form, and whether 
packaged for retail or in bulk form. The merchandise is currently 
classifiable under subheadings 0409.00.00, 1702.90.90, and 2106.90.99 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs 
purposes, the Department's written description of the merchandise under 
this order is dispositive.

Determination Not to Revoke in Part

    As discussed in the Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 73760, Seylinco 
requested that the Department revoke the order in regard to Seylinco 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222 based on three consecutive zero margins. We 
preliminarily determined not to revoke the order with respect to 
Seylinco because it did not ship in commercial quantities during each 
of the three years forming the basis of its request. See id. For these 
final results, the Department has relied upon Seylinco's sales activity 
during the 2003-2004, 2004-2005, and 2005-2006 PORs in making its 
decision with respect to Seylinco's revocation request. Although 
Seylinco had three consecutive years of sales at not less than normal 
value (NV), Seylinco did not sell subject merchandise in commercial 
quantities in each of these three years forming the basis of the 
request for revocation. Thus, Seylinco is not eligible for revocation 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(d)(1). Accordingly, we have determined not 
to revoke the antidumping duty order with respect to Seylinco. See 
Comment 5 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys, 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. 
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum) accompanying this notice.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of issues addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is on file in the CRU and can be accessed directly on the 
web at https://www.ita.doc.gov/.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of comments received we have made two changes 
to the margin calculation for ACA. First, we converted the average cost 
of production calculated for ACA's beekeepers from a per-kilogram to a 
per-metric ton basis. Second, we added ACA's reported homogenization 
costs to the average cost of production. These changes in the 
calculation did not result in a change in the final margin. We made no 
changes to the margin calculation for Seylinco.

Final Results of Review

    We determine that the following dumping margins exist for the 
period December 1, 2005 through November 30, 2006.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted Average
               Manufacturer / Exporter                      Margin
                                                         (percentage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACA.................................................                0.00
Seylinco............................................                0.00
Patagonik S.A.......................................                0.00
El Mana, S.A........................................                0.00
Naiman S.A..........................................                0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have calculated 
duty assessment rates which will be applied uniformly on all ACA, 
Seylinco, Patagonik S.A., El Mana S.A. and Naiman S.A. entries made 
during the POR. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions 
directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final 
results of review. We will direct CBP to liquidate without regard to 
antidumping duties.
    The Department clarified its automatic assessment regulation on May 
6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This clarification will apply to entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in 
these final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not 
know their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such 
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this 
clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, consistent 
with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Tariff Act): (1) cash deposit rate for ACA, Seylinco, Patagonik S.A., 
El Mana S.A. and Naiman S.A. will be zero; (2) if the exporter is not a 
firm covered in this review, but was covered in a previous review or 
the original less than fair value (LTFV) investigation, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published 
for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 
in this review, a prior review, or the original LTFV investigation, but 
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established 
for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and 
(4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in 
this or any previous review conducted by the Department, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be 30.24 percent, which is the all-others 
rate established in the LTFV investigation. See Notice of Antidumping 
Duty Order; Honey From Argentina, 66 FR 63672 (December 10, 2001). 
These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
publication of the final results of the next administrative review.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO

[[Page 24222]]

materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation, which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act.

    Dated: April 28, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix - List of Comments in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

ACA

Comment 1. Reclassification of ACA's Reported Testing and 
Homogenization Expenses
Comment 2. Date of Sale and Selection of the United Kingdom as the 
Third-Country Market
Comment 3. Whether Sales to the United Kingdom Are Representative
Comment 4. Issues Related to the Cost of Production

Seylinco

Comment 5. Revocation
[FR Doc. E8-9729 Filed 5-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-S

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.