Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 24316-24318 [E8-9659]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
24316
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Notices
Description: Data and information
provided by the states on these forms
are used for program planning,
evaluation of program performance and
for oversight/verification activities as
mandated by the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–
508) section 11405(c). For additional
information, see related notice
published at 73 FR 1648 on January 9,
2008.
Electronics Sales of America, LLC,
Portland, Oregon.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Panasonic Shikoku Electronics
Corporation of America (PSECA) who
were adversely affected by increased
imports.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–62,835 is hereby issued as
follows:
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–9673 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am]
‘‘All workers of Panasonic Shikoku
Electronics Corporation of America (PSECA),
including on-site leased workers of Express
Personnel Services, Vancouver, Washington
(TA–W–62,835), and Panasonic Shikoku
Electronics Sales of America, LLC, Portland,
Oregon (TA–W–62,835A), who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after March 22, 2008,
through April 3, 2010, are eligible to apply
for adjustment assistance under Section 223
of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible
to apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act
of 1974.’’
BILLING CODE 4510–FM–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,835; TA–W–62,835A]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Panasonic Shikoku Electronics
Corporation of America (PSECA),
Including On-Site Leased Workers of
Express Personnel Services
Corporation, Vancouver, WA;
Panasonic Shikoku Electronics Sales
of America, LLC, Portland, OR;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on April 3, 2008, applicable
to workers of Panasonic Sikoku
Electronics Corporation of America
(PSECA), including on-site leased
workers of Express Personnel Services,
Vancouver, Washington. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
April 17, 2008 (73 FR 20954).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of MMD/rear projection televisions.
New findings show that worker
separations occurred at the Portland,
Oregon facility of Panasonic Shikoku
Electronics Sales of America, LLC.
Workers at the Portland, Oregon facility
provide purchasing and sales activities
supporting the production of MMD/rear
projection televisions that are produced
at the Vancouver, Washington location
of the subject firm.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending the certification to cover
workers at Panasonic Shikoku
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 May 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
Signed at Washington, DC this 22nd day of
April 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–9662 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,705]
Faurecia Exhaust Systems, a
Subsidiary of Faurecia Exhaust
Division Including On-Site Leased
Workers From Manpower, Inc., Patrick
Staffing, ICI, Argus and Associates and
Industrial Distribution Group Troy, OH;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
At the request of the petitioners, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of automotive exhaust systems.
New information shows that workers
leased from Industrial Distribution
Group were employed on-site at the
Troy, Ohio, location of Faurecia Exhaust
Systems, a subsidiary of Faurecia,
Exhaust Division. The Department has
determined that these workers were
sufficiently under the control of the
subject firm to be considered leased
workers.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include leased workers
of Industrial Distribution Group
working on-site at the Troy, Ohio
location of the subject firm.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers
employed at Faurecia Exhaust Systems,
a subsidiary of Faurecia, Exhaust
Division, Troy, Ohio who were
adversely affected by a shift in
production of automotive exhaust
systems to Mexico.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–62,705 is hereby issued as
follows:
‘‘All workers of Faurecia Exhaust Systems,
a subsidiary of Faurecia, Exhaust Division,
including on-site leased workers from
Manpower, Inc., Patrick Staffing, ICI, Argus
and Associates and Industrial Distribution
Group, Troy, Ohio, who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or
after January 11, 2007, through February 11,
2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’
Signed at Washington, DC this 24th day of
April 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–9661 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on February 11, 2008,
applicable to workers of Faurecia
Exhaust Systems, a subsidiary of
Faurecia, Exhaust Division, including
on-site leased workers from Manpower,
Inc., Patrick Staffing, ICI, Argus and
Associates, Troy, Ohio. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
February 29, 2008 (73 FR 11152).
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Notices
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of April 14 through April 18,
2008.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 May 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–62,991; The Coe Manufacturing
Co., Tigard, OR: March 11, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24317
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–63,022; Super Talent Technology
Corporation, Also Known as CCPS.,
Inc. and Malabs, Inc., San Jose, CA:
March 1, 2007.
TA–W–63,023; Amilon LLC, South
Wallace, NC: March 17, 2007.
TA–W–63,031; G.M. Root, Inc.,
Lackawanna, NY: March 17, 2007.
TA–W–63,063; Hickory Hill Furniture
Corporation, On-Site Leased
workers from Accuforce Staffing
Services, Valdese, NC: March 17,
2007.
TA–W–63,102; Robinson Manufacturing
Company, Clarkrange, TN: March
31, 2007.
TA–W–62,970; Maine Moccasin,
Lewiston, ME: March 5, 2007.
TA–W–62,983; Citation Corporation,
Grand Rapids Division, Lowell, MI:
February 28, 2007.
TA–W–62,993; Burlington Homes of
Maine, Inc., Oxford, ME: March 11,
2007.
TA–W–63,003; Tietex International,
LTD, Tietex Interiors Division,
Gibsonville, NC: May 27, 2007.
TA–W–63,106; Cressona Knit Products,
Inc., Cressona, PA: March 31, 2007.
TA–W–63,106A; Brady Athletic, Inc.,
East Brady, PA: March 31, 2007.
TA–W–63,050; Ruma Production, Inc.,
New York, NY: March 18, 2007.
TA–W–63,052; Chrysler, LLC, St. Louis
North Assembly Plant, Fenton, MO:
March 18, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
24318
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
TA–W–63,014; KLA-Tencor, Assembly
and Testing Department, Milpitas,
CA: March 13, 2007.
TA–W–63,067; Heatcraft Refrigeration,
A Subsidiary of Lennox
International, On-Site Leased
workers From Spherion, Danville,
IL: March 25, 2007.
TA–W–63,107; Littelfuse, Inc.,
Automotive Business Unit, Des
Plaines, IL: March 28, 2007.
TA–W–63,146; Perry Manufacturing
Company, Frisco Office, Frisco, TX:
April 4, 2007.
TA–W–63,156; Temic Automotive of
North American, Inc., Subsidiary of
Continental Automotive Group,
Elma, NY: April 7, 2007.
TA–W–63,173; Parker Seals, A
Subsidiary of Parker Hannifin
Corp., Seals Division, Lebanon, TN:
January 20, 2008.
TA–W–63,097; Medtronic, Inc.,
Medtronic Microelectronics Center,
Tempe, AZ: March 27, 2008.
TA–W–62,780; Xantrex Technology,
Inc., Arlington, WA: January 30,
2007.
TA–W–63,142; Kimball Electronics,
Tampa, Inc., Tampa, FL: April 7,
2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–W–62,676; Hexion Specialty
Chemicals, Formerly Known as
Lawter International, Ink and
Adhesives Resins Division, Pleasant
Prairie, WI: January 10, 2007.
TA–W–62,699; River Bend, Inc.,
Formerly Known as Victor Plastics,
Victor Division, Victor, IA: January
15, 2007.
TA–W–62,699A; River Bend, Inc.,
Formerly Known as Victor Plastics,
Victor Division, Flora, MS: January
15, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 May 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
met. The firm does not have a
significant number of workers 50 years
of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–62,991; The Coe Manufacturing
Co., Tigard, OR.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–62,864; Ametek, Inc.,
Measurement and Calibration
Technology Division, Sellersville,
PA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–62,799; Cooper Power Systems,
Greenwood, SC.
TA–W–63,019; Honeywell Aerospace,
Teterboro, NJ.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–62,938; Alcatel-Lucent, AlcatelLucent Direct Fulfillment Team, St
Louis, MO.
TA–W–62,938A; Alcatel-Lucent, AlcatelLucent Direct Fulfillment Team,
Westford, MA.
TA–W–62,938B; Alcatel-Lucent, AlcatelLucent Direct Fulfillment Team,
Oklahoma City, OK.
TA–W–62,938C; Alcatel-Lucent, AlcatelLucent Direct Fulfillment Team,
Hunt Valley, MD.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TA–W–62,938D; Alcatel-Lucent, AlcatelLucent Direct Fulfillment Team,
Sun City West, AZ.
TA–W–63,144; Teletech Holding, Inc.,
Teletech@Home Division,
Englewood, CO.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the period
of April 14 through April 18, 2008. Copies of
these determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210 during normal
business hours or will be mailed to persons
who write to the above address.
Dated: April 23, 2008.
Erin Fitzgerald,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–9659 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,633]
Faurecia Exhaust Systems Including
On-Site Leased Workers From
Industrial Distribution Group, Granger,
IN; Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on January 15, 2008,
applicable to workers of Faurecia
Exhaust Systems, Granger, Indiana. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on February 1, 2008 (73 FR
6212).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of automotive exhaust systems.
New information shows that leased
workers of Industrial Distribution Group
were employed on-site at the Granger,
Indiana location of Faurecia Exhaust
Systems. The Department has
determined that these workers were
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 86 (Friday, May 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24316-24318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9659]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for
[[Page 24317]]
workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of April 14 through
April 18, 2008.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-62,991; The Coe Manufacturing Co., Tigard, OR: March 11, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-63,022; Super Talent Technology Corporation, Also Known as CCPS.,
Inc. and Malabs, Inc., San Jose, CA: March 1, 2007.
TA-W-63,023; Amilon LLC, South Wallace, NC: March 17, 2007.
TA-W-63,031; G.M. Root, Inc., Lackawanna, NY: March 17, 2007.
TA-W-63,063; Hickory Hill Furniture Corporation, On-Site Leased workers
from Accuforce Staffing Services, Valdese, NC: March 17, 2007.
TA-W-63,102; Robinson Manufacturing Company, Clarkrange, TN: March 31,
2007.
TA-W-62,970; Maine Moccasin, Lewiston, ME: March 5, 2007.
TA-W-62,983; Citation Corporation, Grand Rapids Division, Lowell, MI:
February 28, 2007.
TA-W-62,993; Burlington Homes of Maine, Inc., Oxford, ME: March 11,
2007.
TA-W-63,003; Tietex International, LTD, Tietex Interiors Division,
Gibsonville, NC: May 27, 2007.
TA-W-63,106; Cressona Knit Products, Inc., Cressona, PA: March 31,
2007.
TA-W-63,106A; Brady Athletic, Inc., East Brady, PA: March 31, 2007.
TA-W-63,050; Ruma Production, Inc., New York, NY: March 18, 2007.
TA-W-63,052; Chrysler, LLC, St. Louis North Assembly Plant, Fenton, MO:
March 18, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
[[Page 24318]]
TA-W-63,014; KLA-Tencor, Assembly and Testing Department, Milpitas, CA:
March 13, 2007.
TA-W-63,067; Heatcraft Refrigeration, A Subsidiary of Lennox
International, On-Site Leased workers From Spherion, Danville, IL:
March 25, 2007.
TA-W-63,107; Littelfuse, Inc., Automotive Business Unit, Des Plaines,
IL: March 28, 2007.
TA-W-63,146; Perry Manufacturing Company, Frisco Office, Frisco, TX:
April 4, 2007.
TA-W-63,156; Temic Automotive of North American, Inc., Subsidiary of
Continental Automotive Group, Elma, NY: April 7, 2007.
TA-W-63,173; Parker Seals, A Subsidiary of Parker Hannifin Corp., Seals
Division, Lebanon, TN: January 20, 2008.
TA-W-63,097; Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Microelectronics Center, Tempe,
AZ: March 27, 2008.
TA-W-62,780; Xantrex Technology, Inc., Arlington, WA: January 30, 2007.
TA-W-63,142; Kimball Electronics, Tampa, Inc., Tampa, FL: April 7,
2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA-W-62,676; Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Formerly Known as Lawter
International, Ink and Adhesives Resins Division, Pleasant Prairie, WI:
January 10, 2007.
TA-W-62,699; River Bend, Inc., Formerly Known as Victor Plastics,
Victor Division, Victor, IA: January 15, 2007.
TA-W-62,699A; River Bend, Inc., Formerly Known as Victor Plastics,
Victor Division, Flora, MS: January 15, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50
years of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-62,991; The Coe Manufacturing Co., Tigard, OR.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
TA-W-62,864; Ametek, Inc., Measurement and Calibration Technology
Division, Sellersville, PA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-62,799; Cooper Power Systems, Greenwood, SC.
TA-W-63,019; Honeywell Aerospace, Teterboro, NJ.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-62,938; Alcatel-Lucent, Alcatel-Lucent Direct Fulfillment Team, St
Louis, MO.
TA-W-62,938A; Alcatel-Lucent, Alcatel-Lucent Direct Fulfillment Team,
Westford, MA.
TA-W-62,938B; Alcatel-Lucent, Alcatel-Lucent Direct Fulfillment Team,
Oklahoma City, OK.
TA-W-62,938C; Alcatel-Lucent, Alcatel-Lucent Direct Fulfillment Team,
Hunt Valley, MD.
TA-W-62,938D; Alcatel-Lucent, Alcatel-Lucent Direct Fulfillment Team,
Sun City West, AZ.
TA-W-63,144; Teletech Holding, Inc., Teletech@Home Division, Englewood,
CO.
The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of April 14 through April 18, 2008. Copies
of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons
who write to the above address.
Dated: April 23, 2008.
Erin Fitzgerald,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-9659 Filed 5-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
