Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Criteria for Securities That Underlie Options Traded on the Exchange, 23518-23521 [E8-9469]
Download as PDF
23518
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 84 / Wednesday, April 30, 2008 / Notices
the order to receive price improvement.
Although the exposed order may receive
price improvement, the order may not
be executable at the conclusion of the
exposure period. In addition, ISE Rules
717(d) and (e), which require members
to expose agency orders to the market
before executing them against
proprietary or solicited orders, will
continue to apply to the execution of
complex orders.
III. Discussion
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change, as
amended, is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities exchange.12 In
particular, the Commission finds that
the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,13 which requires, in
part, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Commission notes that the
proposal will provide ISE members with
the option to seek potential price
improvement for complex orders.
Marketable complex orders would be
exposed to attract contra-side trading
interest only if they are marked for price
improvement. If marked for price
improvement, a complex order that
would otherwise be executable upon
entry will be exposed on the ISE’s
complex order book for a period of up
to one second thereby providing an
opportunity for market participants to
enter contra-side orders that could
provide price improvement. Such an
order would not be executable by its
terms until the end of the exposure
period. The Commission believes that,
because of the unique nature of complex
orders, it is consistent with the Act for
ISE’s rules to allow members seeking to
execute a particular complex order
strategy to choose to attach an
additional contingency to their orders
that would render such orders
unexecutable during an exposure period
for the purpose of attracting price
improvement.14
12 In
approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
14 Although a complex order is marketable upon
entry, it may not be executable at the conclusion
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Apr 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
In addition, the Commission notes
that the requirements of ISE Rule 722,
including the priority requirements of
ISE Rule 722(b)(2) applicable to public
customer orders, will continue to apply.
In addition, ISE Rules 717(d) and (e),
which require members to expose
agency orders for three seconds before
executing them against proprietary or
solicited orders, will continue to apply
to complex orders. Thus, a member
would not be able to enter a proprietary
order, or a solicited order, to trade with
an agency order during the complex
order exposure period, which will last
for one second or less.15
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,16 that the
proposed rule change (SR–ISE–2007–
77), as amended, is approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–9460 Filed 4–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–57715; File No. SR–Phlx–
2008–30]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the Criteria for
Securities That Underlie Options
Traded on the Exchange
April 25, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 24,
2008, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
of the exposure period because of changes to ISE’s
quoted market.
15 See supra note 11.
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders
the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Phlx Rule 1009, Criteria for Underlying
Securities, and Phlx Rule 1010,
Withdrawal of Approval of Underlying
Securities or Options, to permit the
initial and continued listing and trading
of options on Index Multiple Exchange
Traded Fund Shares (‘‘Index Multiple
ETFs’’) and Index Inverse Exchange
Traded Fund Shares (‘‘Index Inverse
ETFs’’), and the listing and trading of
options on shares of certain funds or
trusts that hold specified non-U.S.
currencies.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s principal
office, the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, and https://
www.phlx.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change, and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. Phlx
has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
An Index Multiple ETF seeks to
provide investment results, before fees
and expenses, that correspond to a
specified multiple of the percentage
performance on a given day of a
particular foreign or domestic stock
index. An Index Inverse ETF seeks to
provide investment results, before fees
and expenses, that correspond to the
inverse (opposite) of the percentage
performance on a given day of a
particular foreign or domestic stock
index by a specified multiple. Index
Multiple ETFs and Index Inverse ETFs
differ from traditional exchange-traded
fund shares or ‘‘Units’’ in that they do
4 17
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
30APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 84 / Wednesday, April 30, 2008 / Notices
not merely correspond to the
performance of a given index, but rather
attempt to match a multiple or inverse
of such underlying index performance.
The ProShares Ultra Funds, which
currently trade on the American Stock
Exchange (‘‘Amex’’), are examples of
Index Multiple ETFs. The ProShares
Short Funds and the UltraShort Funds,
which are also currently listed for
trading on Amex, are examples of Index
Inverse ETFs.5
To achieve investment results that
provide either a positive multiple or
inverse of the benchmark index, Index
Multiple ETFs or Index Inverse ETFs
may hold a combination of financial
instruments, including, among other
things: Stock index futures contracts;
options on futures; options on securities
and indexes; equity caps, collars, and
floors; swap agreements; forward
contracts; repurchase agreements; and
reverse repurchase agreements
(collectively ‘‘Financial Instruments’’).
The underlying portfolio of an Index
Multiple ETF generally will hold at least
85% of its assets in the component
securities of the underlying relevant
benchmark index. The remainder is
devoted to Financial Instruments that
are intended to create the additional
exposure to the underlying index
necessary to pursue its investment
objective. Normally, 100% of the value
of the portfolio underlying an Index
Inverse ETF will be devoted to Financial
Instruments and money market
instruments, including U.S. government
securities and repurchase agreements
(‘‘Money Market Instruments’’).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Initial Listing Standards
Currently, Commentary .06 to Phlx
Rule 1009 provides that securities
deemed appropriate for options trading
shall include shares or other securities
(‘‘Exchange-Traded Fund Shares’’ or
‘‘ETFs’’) that are traded on a national
securities exchange or through the
facilities of a national securities
5 The Ultra Funds are expected to gain, on a
percentage basis, approximately twice (200%) as
much as the underlying benchmark index and
should lose approximately twice (200%) as much
as the underlying benchmark index when such
prices decline. The Short Funds are expected to
achieve investment results, before fees and
expenses, that correspond to the inverse or opposite
of the daily performance (¥100%) or an underlying
benchmark index. Lastly, the UltraShort Funds are
expected to achieve investment result, before fees
and expenses, that correspond to twice the inverse
or opposite of the daily performance (¥200%) of
the underlying benchmark index. See Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 52553 (October 3, 2005),
70 FR 59100 (October 11, 2005) (SR–Amex–2004–
62) (approving the listing and trading of Ultra
Funds and Short Funds) and 54040 (June 23, 2006),
71 FR 37629 (June 30, 2006) (SR–Amex–2006–41)
(approving the listing and trading of the UltraShort
Funds).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Apr 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
association and reported as a national
market security, and that: (1) Represent
interests in a registered investment
company organized as an open-end
management investment company, a
unit investment trust, or a similar entity
that holds securities constituting or
otherwise based on or representing
investments in index or portfolio of
securities; or (2) represent commodity
pool interests principally engaged,
directly or indirectly, in holding and/or
managing portfolios or baskets of
securities, commodity futures contracts,
options on commodity futures contracts,
swaps, forward contracts, and/or
options on physical commodities and/or
non-U.S. currency (‘‘Commodity Pool
ETFs’’).
The Exchange proposes to amend
Commentary .06 to Phlx Rule 1009 to
include the listing and trading of
options based on Index Multiple ETFs
and Index Inverse ETFs that may hold
or invest in any combination of
securities, Financial Instruments, and/or
Money Market Instruments. Index
Multiple ETFs and Index Inverse ETFs
must continue to otherwise satisfy the
listing standards in Phlx Rule 1010. In
addition, the Exchange proposes to
make non-substantive, technical
changes to Commentary .06 such as, for
example, removal of the reference to a
‘‘national securities association’’ to
conform Phlx’s rule to other options
exchange rules.
The Exchange also proposes to modify
Commentary .06 regarding interests in a
fund or trust that holds a specified nonU.S. currency or currencies, and
surveillance agreements in respect
thereof, by conforming this part of the
commentary to the rules of Amex,
Chicago Board Options Exchange
(‘‘CBOE’’), International Securities
Exchange (‘‘ISE’’), and NYSE Arca.6
Thus, Phlx proposes to amend its
Commentary .06 at (iii) to expand the
options that may be listed on the
Exchange to include options on a fund
(trust) that represents an interest in a
trust or other similar entity that holds
specified non-U.S. currency or
currencies deposited with the trust or
similar entity (‘‘Fund’’). The Exchange
is also proposing to require in
Commentary .06 at (b)(v) that, for any
Fund that holds specified non-U.S.
currencies deposited with the trust, the
Exchange will have entered into a
comprehensive surveillance sharing
agreement with the marketplace or
6 See Commentary .06(ii) and (b)(iv) to Amex Rule
915; Interpretation and Policy .06(ii) and (D) to
CBOE Rule 5.3; ISE Rule 502(h)(ii) and (h)(B)(4);
NYSE Arca Rule 5.3(g). The Exchange notes that
these rules are substantially similar to the rules
being proposed by the Exchange in this filing.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23519
marketplaces with last-sale reporting
that represent(s) the highest volume in
derivatives (options or futures) on the
non-U.S. currency or currencies, which
are utilized by the national securities
exchange where the underlying Fund is
listed and traded.
As set forth in proposed amended
Commentary .06 to Phlx Rule 1009, an
underlying Index Multiple ETF, Index
Inverse ETF, or Fund must be traded on
a national securities exchange and must
be an ‘‘NMS stock’’ as defined under
Rule 600 of Regulation NMS. In
addition, an Index Multiple ETF, Index
Inverse ETF, or Fund must meet either:
(1) The criteria and guidelines under
Commentary .01 to Phlx Rule 1009; or
(2) be available for creation or
redemption each business day in cash or
in kind from the investment company,
commodity pool, or other entity at a
price related to net asset value. In
addition, the investment company,
commodity pool, or other entity shall
provide that shares may be created even
though some or all of the securities and/
or cash (in lieu of the Financial
Instruments) needed to be deposited
have not been received by the unit
investment trust or the management
investment company, provided the
authorized creation participant has
undertaken to deliver the shares and/or
cash as soon as possible and such
undertaking has been secured by the
delivery and maintenance of collateral
consisting of cash or cash equivalents
satisfactory to the fund which underlies
the option, as described in the
prospectus.
Continued Listing Standards
The Exchange states that its current
continuing listing standards for options
in its Rule 1010 will continue to apply.
The Exchange proposes to amend
Commentary .08 to Phlx Rule 1010 to
indicate that the index or portfolio
underlying the ETF or fund on which an
option is based may consist of various
securities, Financial Instruments, and/or
Money Market Instruments. The
Exchange also seeks to delete the
reference to ‘‘national securities
association.’’ Under the applicable
continued listing criteria in
Commentary .08 to Phlx Rule 1010,
options on ETFs may be subject to the
suspension of opening transactions as
follows: (1) Following the initial 12month period beginning upon the
commencement of trading of the ETFs,
there are fewer than 50 record and/or
beneficial holders of the ETFs for 30 or
more consecutive trading days; (2) the
value of the index or portfolio of
securities, non-U.S. currency, or
portfolio of commodities including
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
23520
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 84 / Wednesday, April 30, 2008 / Notices
commodity futures contracts, options on
commodity futures contracts, swaps,
forward contracts, and/or options on
physical commodities, and/or Financial
Instruments and Money Market
Instruments on which ETFs are based is
no longer calculated or available; or (3)
such other event occurs or condition
exists that in the opinion of the
Exchange makes further dealing on the
Exchange inadvisable.7 Additionally,
the Exchange proposes to clarify that the
relevant instruments have to be an
‘‘NMS stock’’ under Rule 600 of
Regulation NMS.
The expansion of the types of
investments that may be held by Index
Multiple ETFs, Index Inverse ETFs, or
Funds under Commentary .06 to Rule
1009 will not have any effect on the
rules pertaining to position and exercise
limits or margin.8
The Exchange believes that this
proposal is necessary to enable the
Exchange to list and trade options on
the shares of the Ultra Fund, Short
Fund, and UltraShort Fund of the
ProShares Trust. The proposed
amendment is also necessary to enable
the Exchange to list and trade interests
in Funds that hold specified non-U.S.
currencies. The Exchange believes that
the ability to trade options on these
products would provide investors with
greater risk management tools.
The Exchange represents that its
existing surveillance procedures
applicable to trading in options are
adequate to properly monitor the
trading in Index Multiple ETF options
and Index Inverse ETF options and the
trading of options on Funds that hold a
specified non-U.S. currency or
currencies.
2. Statutory Basis
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,9 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,10 in particular, in that it is
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and to
protect investors and the public interest.
7 The Exchange will not open for trading any
additional series of equity options already approved
for trading that do not meet the requirements for
continued approval and may determine to delist the
entire class of options for inadequate volume. See
Commentary .11 to Phlx Rule 1010.
8 See Phlx Rule 1001, Position Limits; Phlx Rule
1002, Exercise Limits; Phlx Rule 722, Margin
Limits.
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Apr 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change would impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in the furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days after the date of
filing (or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest), the proposed rule
change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 11 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.12
The Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay and designate the proposed rule
change as operative upon filing. The
Commission believes that waiving the
30-day operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The proposed rule
change is substantially similar to those
of other options exchanges that have
been previously approved by the
Commission 13 and does not appear to
present any novel regulatory issues.
Therefore, the Commission designates
the proposal operative upon filing.14
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). The Exchange has
satisfied the five-day pre-filing requirement of Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
54983 (December 20, 2006), 71 FR 78476 (December
29, 2006) (Amex–2006–87); 56715 (October 29,
2007), 72 FR 62287 (November 2, 2007) (SR–CBOE–
2007–119); 56871 (November 30, 2007), 72 FR
68924 (December 6, 2007) (SR–ISE–2007–87); and
57226 (January 29. 2008), 73 FR 6762 (February 5,
2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2008–03).
14 For purposes only of waiving the operative
delay of this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
12 17
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2008–30 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2008–30. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2008–30 and should
be submitted on or before May 21, 2008.
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 84 / Wednesday, April 30, 2008 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–9469 Filed 4–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
UNITED STATES SENTENCING
COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United
States Courts
United States Sentencing
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of final action regarding
amendments to a policy statement and
commentary effective May 1, 2008.
AGENCY:
The Sentencing Commission
hereby gives notice of amendments to
the commentary to § 2D1.1 (Unlawful
Manufacturing, Importing, Exporting, or
Trafficking (Including Possession with
Intent to Commit These Offenses);
Attempt or Conspiracy) and to policy
statement § 1B1.10 (Reduction in Term
of Imprisonment as a Result of
Amended Guideline Range (Policy
Statement)) made pursuant to its
authority under 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o),
and (u).
DATES: The Commission has specified
an effective date of May 1, 2008 for the
amendments set forth in this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, Telephone: (202) 502–4590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial
branch of the United States
Government. The Commission
promulgates sentencing guidelines and
policy statements for federal sentencing
courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The
Commission also periodically reviews
and revises previously promulgated
guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o),
and specifies in what circumstances and
by what amount sentences of
imprisonment may be reduced if the
Commission reduces the term of
imprisonment recommended in the
guidelines applicable to a particular
offense or category of offenses pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. 994(u).
Unlike amendments made to
sentencing guidelines, the Commission
is not required to apply the procedures
of section 553 of title 5, United States
Code, to amendments to policy
statements and commentary. See 28
U.S.C. 994(x). To the extent practicable,
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Apr 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
the Commission endeavors to apply
such procedures to amendments to
policy statements and commentary.
Because the Commission has identified
a certain sentencing anomaly in which
some offenders have not received the
reduction intended by Amendment 706
and some offenders have received a
greater reduction than intended by
Amendment 706, see USSC, Guidelines
Manual, Supplement to Appendix C,
Amendment 706 (November 1, 2007),
the Commission did not apply the
provisions of section 553 of title 5,
United States Code, to the promulgation
of the amendments set forth in this
notice.
Additional information may be
accessed through the Commission’s Web
site at www.ussc.gov.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o), and (u);
USSC Rules of Practice and Procedure 4.1.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Amendment: The Commentary to
§ 2D1.1 captioned ‘‘Application Notes’’
is amended in Note 10 by striking
subdivision (D) in its entirety and
inserting the following:
‘‘(D) Determining Base Offense Level
in Offenses Involving Cocaine Base and
Other Controlled Substances.—
(i) In General.—Except as provided in
subdivision (ii), if the offense involves
cocaine base (‘crack’) and one or more
other controlled substance, determine
the combined offense level as provided
by subdivision (B) of this note, and
reduce the combined offense level by 2
levels.
(ii) Exceptions to 2-level Reduction.—
The 2-level reduction provided in
subdivision (i) shall not apply in a case
in which:
(I) the offense involved 4.5 kg or
more, or less than 250 mg, of cocaine
base; or
(II) the 2-level reduction results in a
combined offense level that is less than
the combined offense level that would
apply under subdivision (B) of this note
if the offense involved only the other
controlled substance(s) (i.e., the
controlled substance(s) other than
cocaine base).
(iii) Examples.—
(I) The case involves 20 gm of cocaine
base, 1.5 kg of cocaine, and 10 kg of
marihuana. Under the Drug Equivalency
Tables in subdivision (E) of this note, 20
gm of cocaine base converts to 400 kg
of marihuana (20 gm × 20 kg = 400 kg),
and 1.5 kg of cocaine converts to 300 kg
of marihuana (1.5 kg × 200 gm = 300 kg),
which, when added to the 10 kg of
marihuana results in a combined
equivalent quantity of 710 kg of
marihuana. Under the Drug Quantity
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23521
Table, 710 kg of marihuana corresponds
to a combined offense level of 30, which
is reduced by two levels to level 28. For
the cocaine and marihuana, their
combined equivalent quantity of 310 kg
of marihuana corresponds to a
combined offense level of 26 under the
Drug Quantity Table. Because the
combined offense level for all three drug
types after the 2-level reduction is not
less than the combined base offense
level for the cocaine and marihuana, the
combined offense level for all three drug
types remains level 28.
(II) The case involves 5 gm of cocaine
base and 6 kg of heroin. Under the Drug
Equivalency Tables in subdivision (E) of
this note, 5 gm of cocaine base converts
to 100 kg of marihuana (5 gm × 20 kg
= 100 kg), and 6 kg of heroin converts
to 6,000 kg of marihuana (6,000 gm × 1
kg = 6,000 kg), which, when added
together results in a combined
equivalent quantity of 6,100 kg of
marihuana. Under the Drug Quantity
Table, 6,100 kg of marihuana
corresponds to a combined offense level
of 34, which is reduced by two levels to
32. For the heroin, the 6,000 kg of
marihuana corresponds to an offense
level 34 under the Drug Quantity Table.
Because the combined offense level for
the two drug types after the 2-level
reduction is less than the offense level
for the heroin, the reduction does not
apply and the combined offense level
for the two drugs remains level 34.’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 10, in subdivision (E), by inserting
under the heading ‘‘Cocaine and Other
Schedule I and II Stimulants (and their
immediate precursors)*’’ the following
as the fifteenth entry:
‘‘1 gm Cocaine Base (‘Crack’) = 20 kg
of marihuana’’.
Reason for Amendment: This
amendment modifies the commentary to
§ 2D1.1 (Unlawful Manufacturing,
Importing, Exporting, or Trafficking
(Including Possession with Intent to
Commit These Offenses); Attempt or
Conspiracy) to revise the manner in
which combined offense levels are
determined in cases involving cocaine
base (‘‘crack cocaine’’) and one or more
other controlled substance. Specifically,
Application Note 10(D) has resulted in
a certain sentencing anomaly in which
some offenders have not received the
benefit of the two-level reduction
provided by Amendment 706 because of
the conversion of cocaine base to its
marihuana equivalent, and some
offenders have received a reduction
greater than intended. (See USSC,
Guidelines Manual, Supplement to the
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 84 (Wednesday, April 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23518-23521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9469]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-57715; File No. SR-Phlx-2008-30]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Criteria for Securities That Underlie Options Traded on
the Exchange
April 25, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 24, 2008, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed
rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx Rule 1009, Criteria for
Underlying Securities, and Phlx Rule 1010, Withdrawal of Approval of
Underlying Securities or Options, to permit the initial and continued
listing and trading of options on Index Multiple Exchange Traded Fund
Shares (``Index Multiple ETFs'') and Index Inverse Exchange Traded Fund
Shares (``Index Inverse ETFs''), and the listing and trading of options
on shares of certain funds or trusts that hold specified non-U.S.
currencies.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
principal office, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and https://
www.phlx.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change, and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Phlx has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
An Index Multiple ETF seeks to provide investment results, before
fees and expenses, that correspond to a specified multiple of the
percentage performance on a given day of a particular foreign or
domestic stock index. An Index Inverse ETF seeks to provide investment
results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse
(opposite) of the percentage performance on a given day of a particular
foreign or domestic stock index by a specified multiple. Index Multiple
ETFs and Index Inverse ETFs differ from traditional exchange-traded
fund shares or ``Units'' in that they do
[[Page 23519]]
not merely correspond to the performance of a given index, but rather
attempt to match a multiple or inverse of such underlying index
performance. The ProShares Ultra Funds, which currently trade on the
American Stock Exchange (``Amex''), are examples of Index Multiple
ETFs. The ProShares Short Funds and the UltraShort Funds, which are
also currently listed for trading on Amex, are examples of Index
Inverse ETFs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Ultra Funds are expected to gain, on a percentage basis,
approximately twice (200%) as much as the underlying benchmark index
and should lose approximately twice (200%) as much as the underlying
benchmark index when such prices decline. The Short Funds are
expected to achieve investment results, before fees and expenses,
that correspond to the inverse or opposite of the daily performance
(-100%) or an underlying benchmark index. Lastly, the UltraShort
Funds are expected to achieve investment result, before fees and
expenses, that correspond to twice the inverse or opposite of the
daily performance (-200%) of the underlying benchmark index. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 52553 (October 3, 2005), 70 FR
59100 (October 11, 2005) (SR-Amex-2004-62) (approving the listing
and trading of Ultra Funds and Short Funds) and 54040 (June 23,
2006), 71 FR 37629 (June 30, 2006) (SR-Amex-2006-41) (approving the
listing and trading of the UltraShort Funds).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To achieve investment results that provide either a positive
multiple or inverse of the benchmark index, Index Multiple ETFs or
Index Inverse ETFs may hold a combination of financial instruments,
including, among other things: Stock index futures contracts; options
on futures; options on securities and indexes; equity caps, collars,
and floors; swap agreements; forward contracts; repurchase agreements;
and reverse repurchase agreements (collectively ``Financial
Instruments''). The underlying portfolio of an Index Multiple ETF
generally will hold at least 85% of its assets in the component
securities of the underlying relevant benchmark index. The remainder is
devoted to Financial Instruments that are intended to create the
additional exposure to the underlying index necessary to pursue its
investment objective. Normally, 100% of the value of the portfolio
underlying an Index Inverse ETF will be devoted to Financial
Instruments and money market instruments, including U.S. government
securities and repurchase agreements (``Money Market Instruments'').
Initial Listing Standards
Currently, Commentary .06 to Phlx Rule 1009 provides that
securities deemed appropriate for options trading shall include shares
or other securities (``Exchange-Traded Fund Shares'' or ``ETFs'') that
are traded on a national securities exchange or through the facilities
of a national securities association and reported as a national market
security, and that: (1) Represent interests in a registered investment
company organized as an open-end management investment company, a unit
investment trust, or a similar entity that holds securities
constituting or otherwise based on or representing investments in index
or portfolio of securities; or (2) represent commodity pool interests
principally engaged, directly or indirectly, in holding and/or managing
portfolios or baskets of securities, commodity futures contracts,
options on commodity futures contracts, swaps, forward contracts, and/
or options on physical commodities and/or non-U.S. currency
(``Commodity Pool ETFs'').
The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .06 to Phlx Rule 1009 to
include the listing and trading of options based on Index Multiple ETFs
and Index Inverse ETFs that may hold or invest in any combination of
securities, Financial Instruments, and/or Money Market Instruments.
Index Multiple ETFs and Index Inverse ETFs must continue to otherwise
satisfy the listing standards in Phlx Rule 1010. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to make non-substantive, technical changes to
Commentary .06 such as, for example, removal of the reference to a
``national securities association'' to conform Phlx's rule to other
options exchange rules.
The Exchange also proposes to modify Commentary .06 regarding
interests in a fund or trust that holds a specified non-U.S. currency
or currencies, and surveillance agreements in respect thereof, by
conforming this part of the commentary to the rules of Amex, Chicago
Board Options Exchange (``CBOE''), International Securities Exchange
(``ISE''), and NYSE Arca.\6\ Thus, Phlx proposes to amend its
Commentary .06 at (iii) to expand the options that may be listed on the
Exchange to include options on a fund (trust) that represents an
interest in a trust or other similar entity that holds specified non-
U.S. currency or currencies deposited with the trust or similar entity
(``Fund''). The Exchange is also proposing to require in Commentary .06
at (b)(v) that, for any Fund that holds specified non-U.S. currencies
deposited with the trust, the Exchange will have entered into a
comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement with the marketplace or
marketplaces with last-sale reporting that represent(s) the highest
volume in derivatives (options or futures) on the non-U.S. currency or
currencies, which are utilized by the national securities exchange
where the underlying Fund is listed and traded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Commentary .06(ii) and (b)(iv) to Amex Rule 915;
Interpretation and Policy .06(ii) and (D) to CBOE Rule 5.3; ISE Rule
502(h)(ii) and (h)(B)(4); NYSE Arca Rule 5.3(g). The Exchange notes
that these rules are substantially similar to the rules being
proposed by the Exchange in this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As set forth in proposed amended Commentary .06 to Phlx Rule 1009,
an underlying Index Multiple ETF, Index Inverse ETF, or Fund must be
traded on a national securities exchange and must be an ``NMS stock''
as defined under Rule 600 of Regulation NMS. In addition, an Index
Multiple ETF, Index Inverse ETF, or Fund must meet either: (1) The
criteria and guidelines under Commentary .01 to Phlx Rule 1009; or (2)
be available for creation or redemption each business day in cash or in
kind from the investment company, commodity pool, or other entity at a
price related to net asset value. In addition, the investment company,
commodity pool, or other entity shall provide that shares may be
created even though some or all of the securities and/or cash (in lieu
of the Financial Instruments) needed to be deposited have not been
received by the unit investment trust or the management investment
company, provided the authorized creation participant has undertaken to
deliver the shares and/or cash as soon as possible and such undertaking
has been secured by the delivery and maintenance of collateral
consisting of cash or cash equivalents satisfactory to the fund which
underlies the option, as described in the prospectus.
Continued Listing Standards
The Exchange states that its current continuing listing standards
for options in its Rule 1010 will continue to apply.
The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .08 to Phlx Rule 1010 to
indicate that the index or portfolio underlying the ETF or fund on
which an option is based may consist of various securities, Financial
Instruments, and/or Money Market Instruments. The Exchange also seeks
to delete the reference to ``national securities association.'' Under
the applicable continued listing criteria in Commentary .08 to Phlx
Rule 1010, options on ETFs may be subject to the suspension of opening
transactions as follows: (1) Following the initial 12-month period
beginning upon the commencement of trading of the ETFs, there are fewer
than 50 record and/or beneficial holders of the ETFs for 30 or more
consecutive trading days; (2) the value of the index or portfolio of
securities, non-U.S. currency, or portfolio of commodities including
[[Page 23520]]
commodity futures contracts, options on commodity futures contracts,
swaps, forward contracts, and/or options on physical commodities, and/
or Financial Instruments and Money Market Instruments on which ETFs are
based is no longer calculated or available; or (3) such other event
occurs or condition exists that in the opinion of the Exchange makes
further dealing on the Exchange inadvisable.\7\ Additionally, the
Exchange proposes to clarify that the relevant instruments have to be
an ``NMS stock'' under Rule 600 of Regulation NMS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange will not open for trading any additional series
of equity options already approved for trading that do not meet the
requirements for continued approval and may determine to delist the
entire class of options for inadequate volume. See Commentary .11 to
Phlx Rule 1010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The expansion of the types of investments that may be held by Index
Multiple ETFs, Index Inverse ETFs, or Funds under Commentary .06 to
Rule 1009 will not have any effect on the rules pertaining to position
and exercise limits or margin.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Phlx Rule 1001, Position Limits; Phlx Rule 1002,
Exercise Limits; Phlx Rule 722, Margin Limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that this proposal is necessary to enable the
Exchange to list and trade options on the shares of the Ultra Fund,
Short Fund, and UltraShort Fund of the ProShares Trust. The proposed
amendment is also necessary to enable the Exchange to list and trade
interests in Funds that hold specified non-U.S. currencies. The
Exchange believes that the ability to trade options on these products
would provide investors with greater risk management tools.
The Exchange represents that its existing surveillance procedures
applicable to trading in options are adequate to properly monitor the
trading in Index Multiple ETF options and Index Inverse ETF options and
the trading of options on Funds that hold a specified non-U.S. currency
or currencies.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days after the date of filing (or such shorter time as the Commission
may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest), the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and subparagraph (f)(6)
of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). The Exchange has satisfied the
five-day pre-filing requirement of Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay and designate the proposed rule change as operative
upon filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. The proposed rule change is substantially similar to those of
other options exchanges that have been previously approved by the
Commission \13\ and does not appear to present any novel regulatory
issues. Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative
upon filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 54983 (December
20, 2006), 71 FR 78476 (December 29, 2006) (Amex-2006-87); 56715
(October 29, 2007), 72 FR 62287 (November 2, 2007) (SR-CBOE-2007-
119); 56871 (November 30, 2007), 72 FR 68924 (December 6, 2007) (SR-
ISE-2007-87); and 57226 (January 29. 2008), 73 FR 6762 (February 5,
2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2008-03).
\14\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay of this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in the furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2008-30 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2008-30. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2008-30 and should be
submitted on or before May 21, 2008.
[[Page 23521]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-9469 Filed 4-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P