Certain Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations, 23188-23194 [E8-9361]
Download as PDF
23188
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 29, 2008 / Notices
Determination: Certain Steel Products
from Italy, 58 FR 37327 (July 9, 1993).
Therefore, we are not investigating the
provision of ‘‘other companies’’ for less
than adequate remuneration.
7. Other Grant Programs
Petitioners assert that a review of
available financial reports of Chinese
welded line pipe producers indicates
that many of the producers have
benefitted from direct cash grants
provided under other grant programs
and policies administered by the GOC.
Petitioners, however, have not
adequately established with reasonably
available evidence how these programs
are specific. Petitioners also have not
established whether these grants are a
result of programs separate from those
which Petitioners have already alleged.
We, therefore, are not investigating this
program.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Application of the Countervailing Duty
Law to the PRC
The Department has treated the PRC
as a non-market economy (‘‘NME’’)
country in all past AD investigations
and administrative reviews. In
accordance with section 771(18)(C)(i) of
the Act, any determination that a
country is an NME country shall remain
in effect until revoked by the
administering authority. See, e.g.,
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts
Thereof, Finished and 10 Unfinished,
(‘‘TRBs’’) From the People’s Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of 2001–
2002 Administrative Review and Partial
Rescission of Review, 68 FR 7500, 7500–
1 (February 14, 2003), unchanged in
TRBs from the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of 2001–2002
Administrative Review, 68 FR 70488,
70488–89 (December 18, 2003).
In the final affirmative CVD
determination on coated free sheet
paper from the PRC, the Department
determined that the current nature of
the PRC economy does not create
obstacles to applying the necessary
criteria in the CVD law. See Coated Free
Sheet Paper from the People’s Republic
of China: Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination, 72
FR 60645 (October 25, 2007), and the
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 1. Therefore,
because Petitioners have provided
sufficient allegations and support of
their allegations to meet the statutory
criteria for initiating a CVD
investigation of welded line pipe from
the PRC, initiation of a CVD
investigation is warranted in this case.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Apr 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
Respondent Selection
For this investigation, the Department
expects to select respondents based on
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. imports during the
POI. We intend to make our decision
regarding respondent selection within
20 days of publication of this Federal
Register notice. The Department invites
comments regarding the CBP data and
respondent selection within seven
calendar days of publication of this
Federal Register notice.
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section
702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act, a copy of the
public version of the Petition has been
provided to the GOC. As soon as
possible and to the extent practicable,
we will attempt to provide a copy of the
public version of the Petition to each
exporter named in the Petition,
consistent with 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
We have notified the ITC of our
initiation, as required by section 702(d)
of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine,
within 25 days after the date on which
it receives notice of the initiation,
whether there is a reasonable indication
that imports of subsidized welded line
pipe from the PRC are causing material
injury, or threatening to cause material
injury, to a U.S. industry. See Section
703(a)(2) of the Act. A negative ITC
determination will result in the
investigation being terminated;
otherwise, the investigation will
proceed according to statutory and
regulatory time limits.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: April 23, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–9345 Filed 4–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–861, A–570–935]
Certain Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Line Pipe From the
Republic of Korea and the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Investigations
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DATES:
Effective Date: April 29, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dena Crossland (Republic of Korea),
Jeffrey Pederson, or Rebecca Pandolph
(People’s Republic of China), AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7 and Office 4,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–3362,
202–482–2769, or 202–482–3627,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On April 3, 2008, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) received the
petition concerning imports of certain
circular welded carbon quality steel line
pipe (‘‘welded line pipe’’) from the
Republic of Korea (‘‘Korea’’) and the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
filed in proper form by United States
Steel Corporation (‘‘U.S. Steel’’),
Maverick Tube Corporation
(‘‘Maverick’’), Tex-Tube Company
(‘‘Tex-Tube’’), and the United Steel,
Paper and Forestry, Rubber,
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied
Industrial and Service Workers
International Union, and AFL–CIO–CLC
(‘‘United Steelworkers’’) (collectively,
‘‘Petitioners’’). See Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties: Certain Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Line Pipe from the
People’s Republic of China and the
Republic of Korea, dated April 3, 2008
(in four volumes) (‘‘Petition’’).
On April 9, 2008, the Department
issued requests for additional
information and clarification of certain
areas of the Petition. Based on the
Department’s requests, Petitioners filed
additional information supplementing
the Petition on April 14, 2008, including
one submission on general issues
(Response to the Department
Questionnaire Concerning Volume I of
the Petition, dated April 14, 2008
(‘‘Supp. Response’’)), one distinct
submission on Korea-only material
(Response to the Department
Questionnaire Concerning the Republic
of Korea, dated April 14, 2008 (‘‘Supp.
Korea Response’’)), and one distinct
submission on PRC-only material
(Response to the Department
Questionnaire Concerning the People’s
Republic of China, dated April 14, 2008
(‘‘Supp. PRC AD Response’’)). On April
16 and April 17, 2008, the Department
called Petitioners to request certain
information relating to the Petition, the
Supp. Korea Response, and the Supp.
PRC AD Response. See Memorandum to
the File from Meredith A.W. Rutherford,
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 29, 2008 / Notices
Import Policy Analyst, regarding
Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties—Certain Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Line Pipe from the
People’s Republic of China and the
Republic of Korea: Phone Call with
Petitioner Regarding Industry Support,
dated April 16, 2008; Memorandum to
the File from Juanita H. Chen, Special
Assistant to the SEC Office, through
Edward C. Yang, Director, SEC Office,
AD/CVD Operations, China/NME
Group, regarding Circular Welded
Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the
People’s Republic of China: Request for
Information, dated April 17, 2008; and
Memorandum to the File from Dena
Crossland, Analyst, through Patrick
Edwards, Acting Program Manager, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, regarding
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea:
Request for Information, dated April 17,
2008. On April 18, 2008, Wheatland
Tube Company, a U.S. manufacturer of
welded line pipe, filed a letter in
support of the Petition. On April 21,
2008, Petitioners filed additional
information in response to the
Department’s April 16, 2008, and April
17, 2008, request for information. See
Response to the Department’s Second
Request for Additional Information
Concerning the People’s Republic of
China and the Republic of Korea, dated
April 21, 2008 (‘‘Second Supp.
Response’’); Response to the
Department’s Second Request for
Additional Information Concerning the
People’s Republic of China, dated April
21, 2008 (‘‘Second Supp. PRC AD
Response’’); and Response to the
Department’s Second Request for
Additional Information Concerning the
Republic of Korea, dated April 21, 2008
(‘‘Second Supp. Korea Response’’). On
April 21, 2008, The Department called
Petitioners regarding the scope
language. See Memorandum to the File
from Norbert Gannon, Supervisory
Import Policy Analyst, regarding
Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties—Certain Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Line Pipe from the
People’s Republic of China and the
Republic of Korea: Phone Call with
Petitioner Regarding Scope, dated April
21, 2008. Additionally, on April 21,
2008, Stupp Corporation, a domestic
producer of subject merchandise, filed a
letter in support of the Petition.
In accordance with section 732(b) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(‘‘Act’’), Petitioners allege that imports
of welded line pipe from Korea and the
PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Apr 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
in the United States at less than fair
value, within the meaning of section
731 of the Act, and that such imports
are materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, an industry in the
United States.
The Department finds that Petitioners
filed the Petition on behalf of the
domestic industry because Petitioners
are interested parties as defined in
sections 771(9)(C) and 771(9)(D) of the
Act, and have demonstrated sufficient
industry support with respect to the
antidumping duty investigations that
Petitioners are requesting that the
Department initiate. See ‘‘Determination
of Industry Support for the Petition’’
section below.
Periods of Investigation
The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’)
for Korea is April 1, 2007, through
March 31, 2008. The POI for the PRC is
October 1, 2007, through March 31,
2008. See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(1).
Scope of Investigations
The merchandise covered by each of
these investigations is circular welded
carbon quality steel pipe of a kind used
for oil and gas pipelines (‘‘welded line
pipe’’), not more that 406.4 mm (16
inches) in outside diameter, regardless
of wall thickness, length, surface finish,
end finish or stenciling.
The term ‘‘carbon quality steel’’
includes both carbon steel and carbon
steel mixed with small amounts of
alloying elements that may exceed the
individual weight limits for nonalloy
steels imposed in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Specifically, the term
‘‘carbon quality’’ includes products in
which (1) Iron predominates by weight
over each of the other contained
elements, (2) the carbon content is 2
percent or less by weight and (3) none
of the elements listed below exceeds the
quantity by weight respectively
indicated:
(i) 2.00 percent of manganese,
(ii) 2.25 percent of silicon,
(iii) 1.00 percent of copper,
(iv) 0.50 percent of aluminum,
(v) 1.25 percent of chromium,
(vi) 0.30 percent of cobalt,
(vii) 0.40 percent of lead,
(viii) 1.25 percent of nickel,
(ix) 0.30 percent of tungsten,
(x) 0.012 percent of boron,
(xi) 0.50 percent of molybdenum,
(xii) 0.15 percent of niobium,
(xiii) 0.41 percent of titanium,
(xiv) 0.15 percent of vanadium, or
(xv) 0.15 percent of zirconium.
Welded line pipe is normally
produced to specifications published by
the American Petroleum Institute
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23189
(‘‘API’’) (or comparable foreign
specifications) including API A–25,
5LA, 5LB, and X grades from 42 and
above, and/or any other proprietary
grades or non-graded material.
Nevertheless, all pipe meeting the
physical description set forth above that
is of a kind used in oil and gas
pipelines, including all multiplestenciled pipe with an API line pipe
stencil is covered by the scope of these
investigations.
The line pipe products that are the
subject of these investigations are
currently classifiable in the HTSUS
under subheadings 7306.19.10.10,
7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and
7306.19.51.50. While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of these
investigations is dispositive.
Comments on Scope of Investigations
During our review of the Petition, we
discussed the scope with Petitioners to
ensure that it is an accurate reflection of
the products for which the domestic
industry is seeking relief. The scope of
these investigations covers line pipe
which, we recognize, may include
certain merchandise potentially subject
to the on-going antidumping (‘‘AD’’) and
countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’)
investigations of circular welded pipe
(‘‘CWP’’). See Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less than Fair
Value and Postponement of Final
Determination, 73 FR 2445 (January 15,
2008); see also Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination; Preliminary Affirmative
Determination of Critical
Circumstances; and Alignment of Final
Countervailing Duty Determination with
Final Antidumping Duty Determination,
72 FR 63875 ( November 13, 2007).
Given that the scope issue has not been
finally resolved in the CWP
investigations, for purposes of these
initiations, we have defined the scope to
include the potential overlap. However,
we intend to resolve the issue to ensure
that there will be no overlap between
the scopes in the CWP and welded line
pipe cases. Moreover, as discussed in
the preamble to the regulations
(Antidumping Duties; Countervailing
Duties; Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323
(May 19, 1997)), we are setting aside a
period for interested parties to raise
issues regarding product coverage. The
Department encourages all interested
parties to submit such comments by
May 13, 2008, which is 20 calendar days
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
23190
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 29, 2008 / Notices
from the date of signature of this notice.
Comments should be addressed to
Import Administration’s APO/Dockets
Unit, Room 1117, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
The period of scope consultations is to
provide the Department with ample
opportunity to consider all comments
and to consult with parties prior to the
issuance of the preliminary
determinations.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Comments on Product Characteristics
for Antidumping Duty Questionnaires
We are requesting comments from
interested parties regarding the
appropriate physical characteristics of
welded line pipe to be reported in
response to the Department’s
antidumping duty questionnaires. This
information will be used to identify the
key physical characteristics of the
subject merchandise in order to more
accurately report the relevant factors
and costs of production, as well as to
develop appropriate product
comparison criteria.
Interested parties may provide any
information or comments that they feel
are relevant to the development of an
accurate listing of physical
characteristics. Specifically, they may
provide comments as to which
characteristics are appropriate to use as
(1) general product characteristics and
(2) the product comparison criteria. We
note that it is not always appropriate to
use all product characteristics as
product comparison criteria. We base
product comparison criteria on
meaningful commercial differences
among products. In other words, while
there may be some physical product
characteristics utilized by
manufacturers to describe welded line
pipe, it may be that only a select few
product characteristics take into account
commercially meaningful physical
characteristics. In addition, interested
parties may comment on the order in
which the physical characteristics
should be used in product matching.
Generally, the Department attempts to
list the most important physical
characteristics first and the least
important characteristics last.
In order to consider the suggestions of
interested parties in developing and
issuing the antidumping duty
questionnaires, we must receive
comments at the above-referenced
address by May 13, 2008. Additionally,
rebuttal comments addressing only
those issues raised in the comments
must be received by May 20, 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Apr 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
Determination of Industry Support for
the Petition
Section 732(b)(1) of the Act requires
that a petition be filed on behalf of the
domestic industry. Section 732(c)(4)(A)
of the Act provides that a petition meets
this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the
petition account for: (i) at least 25
percent of the total production of the
domestic like product; and (ii) more
than 50 percent of the production of the
domestic like product produced by that
portion of the industry expressing
support for, or opposition to, the
petition. Moreover, section 732(c)(4)(D)
of the Act provides that, if the petition
does not establish support of domestic
producers or workers accounting for
more than 50 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product,
the Department shall: (i) Poll the
industry or rely on other information in
order to determine if there is support for
the petition, as required by
subparagraph (A), or (ii) determine
industry support using a statistically
valid sampling method.
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines
the ‘‘industry’’ as the producers as a
whole of a domestic like product. Thus,
to determine whether a petition has the
requisite industry support, the statute
directs the Department to look to
producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The U.S.
International Trade Commission
(‘‘ITC’’), which is responsible for
determining whether ‘‘the domestic
industry’’ has been injured, must also
determine what constitutes a domestic
like product in order to define the
industry. While both the Department
and the ITC must apply the same
statutory definition regarding the
domestic like product (section 771(10)
of the Act), they do so for different
purposes and pursuant to a separate and
distinct authority. In addition, the
Department’s determination is subject to
limitations of time and information.
Although this may result in different
definitions of the like product, such
differences do not render the decision of
either agency contrary to law. See
USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F.
Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 2001), citing Algoma
Steel Corp. Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff’d 865
F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989), cert. denied
492 U.S. 919 (1989).
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the
domestic like product as ‘‘a product
which is like, or in the absence of like,
most similar in characteristics and uses
with, the article subject to an
investigation under this subtitle.’’ Thus,
the reference point from which the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
domestic like product analysis begins is
‘‘the article subject to an investigation’’
(i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to
be investigated, which normally will be
the scope as defined in the petition).
With regard to the domestic like
product, Petitioners do not offer a
definition of domestic like product
distinct from the scope of these
investigations. Based on our analysis of
the information submitted on the
record, we have determined that welded
line pipe constitutes a single domestic
like product and we have analyzed
industry support in terms of that
domestic like product. For a discussion
of the domestic like product analysis in
this case, see ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Investigation Initiation Checklist:
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Quality
Steel Line Pipe from the Republic of
Korea (Korea)’’ (‘‘Korea Initiation
Checklist’’), Industry Support at
Attachment II, and ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Investigation Initiation Checklist:
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Quality
Steel Line Pipe from the People’s
Republic of China’’ (‘‘PRC Initiation
Checklist’’), Industry Support at
Attachment II, on file in the Central
Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room 1117 of
the main Department of Commerce
building.
With regard to section 732(c)(4)(A) of
the Act, in determining whether
Petitioners have standing (i.e., those
domestic workers and producers
supporting the Petition account for (1) at
least 25 percent of the total production
of the domestic like product and (2)
more than 50 percent of the production
of the domestic like product produced
by that portion of the industry
expressing support for, or opposition to,
the Petition), we considered the
industry support data contained in the
Petition with reference to the domestic
like product as defined in the ‘‘Scope of
Investigations’’ section, above. To
establish industry support, Petitioners
provided their shipments for the
domestic like product for the year 2007,
and compared them to shipments of the
domestic like product for the industry.
In the Petition, Petitioners demonstrated
the correlation between shipments and
production and argued that shipments
are a good proxy for production. See
Petition, Volume I, at 3, and Exhibit 3b.
Based on the fact that total industry
production data for the domestic like
product for 2007 is not reasonably
available, and that Petitioners have
established that shipments are a
reasonable proxy for production data,
we have relied upon shipment data for
purposes of measuring industry support.
For further discussion, see Korea
Initiation Checklist and PRC Initiation
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 29, 2008 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Checklist at Attachment II (Industry
Support).
The Department’s review of the data
provided in the Petition, supplemental
submissions, and other information
readily available to the Department
indicates that Petitioners have
established industry support. First, the
Petition establishes support from
domestic producers (or workers)
accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like
product and, as such, the Department is
not required to take further action in
order to evaluate industry support (e.g.,
polling). See section 732(c)(4)(D) of the
Act and Korea Initiation Checklist and
PRC Initiation Checklist at Attachment
II (Industry Support). Second, the
domestic producers (or workers) have
met the statutory criteria for industry
support under section 732(c)(4)(A)(i) of
the Act because the domestic producers
(or workers) who support the Petition
account for at least 25 percent of the
total production of the domestic like
product. See Korea Initiation Checklist
and PRC Initiation Checklist at
Attachment II (Industry Support).
Finally, the domestic producers (or
workers) have met the statutory criteria
for industry support under section
732(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the
domestic producers (or workers) who
support the Petition account for more
than 50 percent of the production of the
domestic like product produced by that
portion of the industry expressing
support for, or opposition to, the
Petition. Accordingly, the Department
determines that the Petition was filed on
behalf of the domestic industry within
the meaning of section 732(b)(1) of the
Act. See Korea Initiation Checklist and
PRC Initiation Checklist at Attachment
II (Industry Support).
The Department finds that Petitioners
filed the Petition on behalf of the
domestic industry because they are
interested parties as defined in sections
771(9)(C) and 771(9)(D) of the Act and
have demonstrated sufficient industry
support with respect to the antidumping
investigation that they are requesting
the Department initiate. See Korea
Initiation Checklist and PRC Initiation
Checklist at Attachment II (Industry
Support).
Allegations and Evidence of Material
Injury and Causation
Petitioners allege that the U.S.
industry producing the domestic like
product is being materially injured, or is
threatened with material injury, by
reason of the imports of the subject
merchandise sold at less than normal
value (‘‘NV’’). Petitioners contend that
the industry’s injured condition is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Apr 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
illustrated by reduced market share,
underselling and price depressing and
suppressing effects, lost sales and
revenues, a decline in financial
performance, and an increase in import
penetration. We have assessed the
allegations and supporting evidence
regarding material injury, threat of
material injury, and causation, and we
have determined that these allegations
are properly supported by adequate
evidence and meet the statutory
requirements for initiation. See Korea
Initiation Checklist and PRC Initiation
Checklist at Attachment III.
Allegations of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value
The following is a description of the
allegations of sales at less than fair value
(‘‘LTFV’’) upon which the Department
based its decision to initiate these
investigations of imports of welded line
pipe from Korea and the PRC. The
sources of data for the deductions and
adjustments relating to the U.S. price,
NV (for Korea), and the factors of
production (for the PRC) are also
discussed in the country-specific
initiation checklists. See Korea
Initiation Checklist and PRC Initiation
Checklist. Should the need arise to use
any of this information as facts available
under section 776 of the Act in our
preliminary or final determinations, we
will reexamine the information and
revise the margin calculations, if
appropriate.
Korea
Constructed Export Price (‘‘CEP’’)
Petitioners calculated two CEPs based
on price quotes for Korean-produced
welded line pipe that was sold or
offered for sale in the United States
during the POI. Petitioners claimed that
CEP was appropriate for Korea because
the major Korean producers of welded
line pipe typically sell through affiliated
offices in the United States which, in
turn, resell the welded line pipe to
distributors in the United States. See
Petition, Volume IV, at Exhibit IV–1.
Petitioners made adjustments to the
starting price for foreign inland freight,
ocean freight, marine insurance
expenses, foreign and U.S. port
expenses, and estimated expenses that
the affiliated distributor would incur in
selling merchandise on behalf of the
Korean producer in the United States.
Foreign inland freight, ocean freight and
insurance were calculated as the
difference between the value of welded
line pipe imports from Korea on a ‘‘costinsurance-freight’’ (‘‘CIF’’) basis, and the
value of welded line pipe imports from
Korea on a custom’s value basis as
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23191
reported on the ITC’s ‘‘DataWeb’’ at
https://usitc.gov/tata/hts/other/dataweb.
Petitioners calculated foreign and U.S.
port expenses based on U.S. and Korean
tariff schedule data. See Petition,
Volume IV, at Exhibits 7, 7a, and 7b. See
Korea Initiation Checklist for further
discussion.
NV
Petitioners calculated NV based on
home market prices for welded line pipe
produced in Korea and sold or offered
for sale to customers in Korea.
Petitioners calculated the ex-factory NV
for the home market sales by converting
the reported offer prices to a per-ton
basis. See Petition, Volume IV, at 9–12,
and Korea Initiation Checklist for
further discussion.
PRC
EP
Petitioners calculated two EPs based
on two price quotes for welded line pipe
from the PRC, offered for sale during the
POI. Petitioners made adjustments to
the starting prices by deducting the
costs associated with exporting and
delivering the product, including
foreign inland freight and ocean freight,
insurance expenses, foreign and U.S.
port expenses and wharfage fees, and
brokerage and handling expenses. See
PRC Initiation Checklist for further
discussion.
NV
Petitioners note that the PRC is a nonmarket economy country (‘‘NME’’) and,
as the Department has not revoked this
determination, such status remains in
effect today. See Petition, Volume II, at
11. The Department has previously
examined the PRC’s market status and
determined that NME status should
continue for the PRC. See Memorandum
from the Office of Policy to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, regarding The People’s
Republic of China Status as a NonMarket Economy, dated May 15, 2006
(available online at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/
download/prc-nme-status/prc-nmestatus-memo.pdf). In addition, in recent
investigations, the Department has
continued to determine that the PRC is
an NME country. See Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Sodium
Hexametaphosphate from The People’s
Republic of China, 73 FR 6479
(February 4, 2008); Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Partial Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances: Certain
Polyester Staple Fiber from the People’s
Republic of China, 72 FR 19690 (April
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
23192
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 29, 2008 / Notices
19, 2007); Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value: Certain
Activated Carbon from the People’s
Republic of China, 72 FR 9508 (March
2, 2007).
In accordance with section
771(18)(C)(i) of the Act, the
presumption of NME status remains in
effect until revoked by the Department.
The presumption of NME status for the
PRC has not been revoked by the
Department and, therefore, remains in
effect for purposes of the initiation of
this investigation. Accordingly, the NV
of the product is appropriately based on
factors of production valued in a
surrogate market economy country, in
accordance with section 773(c) of the
Act. In the course of the PRC
investigation, all parties will have the
opportunity to provide relevant
information related to the issues of the
PRC’s NME status and the granting of
separate rates to individual exporters.
Petitioners argue that India is the
appropriate surrogate country for the
PRC because it is at a comparable level
of economic development and it is a
significant producer of welded line
pipe. See Petition, Volume II, at 12.
Based on the information provided by
Petitioners, the Department believes that
the use of India as a surrogate country
is appropriate for purposes of initiation.
However, after initiation of the
investigation, interested parties will
have the opportunity to submit
comments regarding surrogate country
selection and, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.301(c)(3)(i), will be provided an
opportunity to submit publicly available
information to value factors of
production within 40 days after the date
of publication of the preliminary
determination.
Petitioners calculated NV and
dumping margins for the two U.S.
prices, discussed above, using the
Department’s NME methodology as
required by 19 CFR 351.202(b)(7)(i)(C)
and 19 CFR 351.408. Petitioners
calculated NV based on Company A’s
consumption rates for producing
welded line pipe, arguing that it is the
best information reasonably available to
Petitioners.1 See PRC Initiation
Checklist.
Petitioners valued the factors of
production to produce welded line pipe
based on reasonably available, public
surrogate country data, including India
import data from the Monthly Statistics
of the Foreign Trade of India, and prices
from Energy Prices & Taxes: Second
1 The identity of Company A is proprietary
information; further discussion of Company A is
available in the initiation checklist. See PRC
Initiation Checklist.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Apr 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
Quarter 2003, published by the
International Energy Agency. Petitioners
calculated labor cost using rates posted
on the Department’s Web site. Where
Petitioners were unable to find input
prices from a period contemporaneous
with the POI, Petitioners adjusted for
inflation using the wholesale price
index for India, as published in the
International Monetary Fund
Publication ‘‘International Financial
Statistics.’’ See Petition, Volume II, at 19
and Exhibit II–8. Petitioners made
currency conversions, where necessary,
using a simple average of the rupee/U.S.
dollar exchange rate for the POI, as
reported on the Department’s Web site.
See Petition, Volume II, at 19; Supp.
PRC AD Response, at Exhibit Supp-9.
While Petitioners calculated movement
expenses using information from the
Department of Commerce and the ITC,
Petitioners did not include freight
expenses in their calculation of
surrogate values for the PRC because
they could not determine the correct
distance necessary for the calculations.
See Petition, Volume II, at 19–20; Supp.
PRC AD Response, at Exhibit Supp-9.
For purposes of initiation, the
Department determines that the
surrogate values used by Petitioners are
reasonably available and, thus,
acceptable. However, the Department
modified the surrogate value that
Petitioners calculated for hot-rolled
steel coil. See PRC Initiation Checklist.
Petitioners based factory overhead
expenses, selling, general and
administrative (‘‘SG&A’’) expenses, and
profit, on financial data from the 2006–
2007 annual reports of Tata Steel
Limited, Jindal SAW Ltd. (‘‘Jindal’’),
and Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd.,
Indian producers of welded steel pipe
using steel sheet in coils. See Petition,
Volume II, at 22–25; Supp. PRC AD
Response at Exhibit Supp-9. We
recalculated factory overhead expenses,
SG&A expenses, and profit using only
Jindal’s data because of the three
potential surrogate companies, only
Jindal’s financial data were from a
period that overlapped with the POI. In
addition, we revised the financial ratios
that Petitioners calculated from Jindal’s
data to account for expenses that were
omitted from Petitioner’s calculation.
See PRC Initiation Checklist.
Fair Value Comparisons
Based on the data provided by
Petitioners, with adjustments as
requested by the Department, there is
reason to believe that imports of welded
line pipe from Korea and the PRC are
being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value.
Based on a comparison of CEP and NV,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
calculated in accordance with sections
772(b) and 773(a)(1) of the Act,
respectively, estimated dumping
margins for welded line pipe from Korea
range from 41.69 percent to 42.75
percent. See Korea Initiation Checklist.
Based on a comparison of EP and NV,
calculated in accordance with sections
772(a) and 773(c) of the Act,
respectively, the revised estimated
dumping margins for welded line pipe
from the PRC range from 57.45 percent
to 58.96 percent. See PRC Initiation
Checklist.
Initiation of Antidumping
Investigations
Based upon the examination of the
Petition on welded line pipe from Korea
and the PRC, the Department finds that
the Petition meets the requirements of
section 732 of the Act. Therefore, we are
initiating antidumping duty
investigations to determine whether
imports of welded line pipe from Korea
and the PRC are being, or are likely to
be, sold in the United States at less than
fair value. In accordance with section
733(b)(1)(A) of the Act, unless
postponed, we intend to make our
preliminary determinations no later
than 140 days after the date of this
initiation.
Respondent Selection for Korea
For the Korean investigation, the
Department intends to select
respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
imports during the POI. We intend to
release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties with access to
information protected by APO within
five days of publication of this Federal
Register notice, and make our decision
regarding respondent selection within
20 days of publication of this notice.
The Department invites comments
regarding the CBP data and respondent
selection within 10 days of publication
of this Federal Register notice.
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Instructions for filing such applications
may be found on the Department’s Web
site at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/apo.
Respondent Selection for the PRC
In the PRC investigation, the
Department will request quantity and
value information from all known
exporters and producers identified, with
complete contact information, in the
Petition. The quantity and value data
received from these exporters/producers
will be used as the basis to select the
mandatory respondents. The
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
23193
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 29, 2008 / Notices
Department requires that the
respondents submit a response to both
the quantity and value questionnaire
and the separate-rate application by the
respective deadlines in order to receive
consideration for separate-rate status.
See Circular Welded Austenitic
Stainless Pressure Pipe from the
People’s Republic of China: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Investigation, 73 FR
10221, 10225 (February 26, 2008); and
Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Investigation: Certain Artist Canvas
From the People’s Republic of China, 70
FR 21996, 21999 (April 28, 2005).
Attachment I of this notice contains the
quantity and value questionnaire that
must be submitted by all NME
exporters/producers no later than May
14, 2008. In addition, the Department
will post the quantity and value
questionnaire along with the filing
instructions on the Import
Administration Web site, at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/ia-highlights-andnews.html. The Department will send
the quantity and value questionnaire to
those PRC companies identified, with
complete contact information, in the
Petition, Volume I, at Exhibit 6a, and in
the Supp. PRC AD Response, at Supp1.
Separate Rates
In order to obtain separate-rate status
in NME investigations, exporters and
producers must submit a separate-rate
status application. See Policy Bulletin
05.1: Separate-Rates Practice and
Application of Combination Rates in
Antidumping Investigations involving
Non-Market Economy Countries (April
5, 2005) (‘‘Separate Rates/Combination
Rates Bulletin’’), available on the
Department’s Web site at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf. The
specific requirements for submitting the
separate-rate application in this
investigation are outlined in detail in
the application itself, available on the
Department’s Web site at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/ia-highlights-andnews.html on the date of publication of
this initiation notice in the Federal
Register. The separate-rate application
will be due 60 days from publication of
this notice.
Use of Combination Rates in an NME
Investigation
The Department will calculate
combination rates for certain
respondents that are eligible for a
separate rate in this investigation. The
Separate Rates/Combination Rates
Bulletin states:
{w}hile continuing the practice of
assigning separate rates only to exporters, all
separate rates that the Department will now
assign in its NME investigations will be
specific to those producers that supplied the
exporter during the period of investigation.
Note, however, that one rate is calculated for
the exporter and all of the producers which
supplied subject merchandise to it during the
period of investigation. This practice applies
both to mandatory respondents receiving an
individually calculated separate rate as well
as the pool of non-investigated firms
receiving the weighted-average of the
individually calculated rates. This practice is
referred to as the application of ‘‘combination
rates’’ because such rates apply to specific
combinations of exporters and one or more
producers. The cash-deposit rate assigned to
an exporter will apply only to merchandise
both exported by the firm in question and
produced by a firm that supplied the exporter
during the period of investigation.
See Separate Rates/Combination Rates
Bulletin, at 6.
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section
732(b)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), copies of the public version
of the Petition have been provided to
the representatives of the Governments
of Korea and the PRC. Because of the
particularly large number of producers/
exporters identified in the Petition, the
Department considers the service of the
public version of the Petition to the
foreign producers/exporters satisfied by
the delivery of the public version to the
Governments of Korea and the PRC,
consistent with 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
International Trade Commission
Notification
We have notified the ITC of our
initiations, as required by section 732(d)
of the Act.
Preliminary Determinations by the
International Trade Commission
The ITC will preliminarily determine,
no later than May 19, 2008, whether
there is a reasonable indication that
imports of welded line pipe from Korea
and the PRC are materially injuring, or
threatening material injury to, a U.S.
industry. A negative ITC determination
with respect to either of the
investigations will result in that
investigation being terminated;
otherwise, these investigations will
proceed according to statutory and
regulatory time limits.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: April 23, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Attachment I
Where it is not practicable to examine
all known producers/exporters of
subject merchandise, section 777A(c)(2)
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as amended)
permits us to investigate 1) a sample of
exporters, producers, or types of
products that is statistically valid based
on the information available at the time
of selection, or 2) exporters and
producers accounting for the largest
volume and value of the subject
merchandise that can reasonably be
examined.
In the chart below, please provide the
total quantity and total value of all of
your sales of merchandise covered by
the scope of this investigation (see
attachment II of this document),
produced in the PRC, and exported/
shipped to the United States during the
period October 1, 2007 through March
31, 2008.
Total
quantity
Market
United States
1. Export Price Sales.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
2.
a. Exporter name.
b. Address.
c. Contact.
d. Phone No.
e. Fax No.
3. Constructed Export Price Sales.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Apr 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Terms of
sale
Total value
23194
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 29, 2008 / Notices
Total
quantity
Market
Terms of
sale
Total value
4. Further Manufactured Sales.
Total Sales.
Because the scope of this
investigation may include certain
merchandise potentially subject to the
on-going antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations of
circular welded pipe, we also request
that you identify, in the chart below, the
total quantity and total value that was
reported in the above chart for sales of
the following merchandise:
Pipe multiple-stenciled to a standard
and/or structural specification and to
any other specification, such as the
American Petroleum Institute (‘‘API’’)
API–5L specification, when it meets the
physical description set forth in the
scope description in the circular welded
pipe cases (see Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less than Fair
Value and Postponement of Final
Determination, 73 FR 2445 (January 15,
2008)) and also has one or more of the
following characteristics: is 32 feet in
length or less; is less than 2.0 inches (50
mm) in outside diameter; has a
galvanized and/or painted surface
finish; or has a threaded and/or coupled
end finish.
Total
quantity
Market
Terms of
sale
Total value
United States
1. Export Price Sales.
2.
a. Exporter name.
b. Address.
c. Contact.
d. Phone No.
e. Fax No.
3. Constructed Export Price Sales.
4. Further Manufactured Sales.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Total Sales.
Total Quantity:
• Please report quantity on a metric
ton basis. If any conversions were used,
please provide the conversion formula
and source.
Terms of Sales:
• Please report all sales on the same
terms (e.g., free on board—port of
export).
Total Value:
• All sales values should be reported
in U.S. dollars. Please indicate any
exchange rates used and their respective
dates and sources.
Export Price Sales:
• Generally, a U.S. sale is classified as
an export price sale when the first sale
to an unaffiliated person occurs before
importation into the United States.
• Please include any sales exported
by your company directly to the United
States.
• Please include any sales exported
by your company to a third-country
market economy reseller where you had
knowledge that the merchandise was
destined to be resold to the United
States.
• If you are a producer of subject
merchandise, please include any sales
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Apr 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
manufactured by your company that
were subsequently exported by an
affiliated exporter to the United States.
• Please do not include any sales of
merchandise manufactured in Hong
Kong in your figures.
Constructed Export Price Sales:
• Generally, a U.S. sale is classified as
a constructed export price sale when the
first sale to an unaffiliated person
occurs after importation. However, if the
first sale to the unaffiliated person is
made by a person in the United States
affiliated with the foreign exporter,
constructed export price applies even if
the sale occurs prior to importation.
• Please include any sales exported
by your company directly to the United
States.
• Please include any sales exported
by your company to a third-country
market economy reseller where you had
knowledge that the merchandise was
destined to be resold to the United
States.
• If you are a producer of subject
merchandise, please include any sales
manufactured by your company that
were subsequently exported by an
affiliated exporter to the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Please do not include any sales of
merchandise manufactured in Hong
Kong in your figures.
Further Manufactured Sales:
• Sales of further manufactured or
assembled (including re-packaged)
merchandise are sales of merchandise
that undergoes further manufacture or
assembly in the United States before
being sold to the first unaffiliated
customer.
• Further manufacture or assembly
costs include amounts incurred for
direct materials, labor and overhead,
plus amounts for general and
administrative expense, interest
expense, and additional packing
expense incurred in the country of
further manufacture, as well as all costs
involved in moving the product from
the U.S. port of entry to the further
manufacturer.
[FR Doc. E8–9361 Filed 4–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 83 (Tuesday, April 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23188-23194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9361]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-861, A-570-935]
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the
Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Investigations
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 29, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dena Crossland (Republic of Korea),
Jeffrey Pederson, or Rebecca Pandolph (People's Republic of China), AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7 and Office 4, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
202-482-3362, 202-482-2769, or 202-482-3627, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On April 3, 2008, the Department of Commerce (``Department'')
received the petition concerning imports of certain circular welded
carbon quality steel line pipe (``welded line pipe'') from the Republic
of Korea (``Korea'') and the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') filed
in proper form by United States Steel Corporation (``U.S. Steel''),
Maverick Tube Corporation (``Maverick''), Tex-Tube Company (``Tex-
Tube''), and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber,
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers
International Union, and AFL-CIO-CLC (``United Steelworkers'')
(collectively, ``Petitioners''). See Imposition of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duties: Certain Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Line Pipe from the People's Republic of China and the Republic of
Korea, dated April 3, 2008 (in four volumes) (``Petition'').
On April 9, 2008, the Department issued requests for additional
information and clarification of certain areas of the Petition. Based
on the Department's requests, Petitioners filed additional information
supplementing the Petition on April 14, 2008, including one submission
on general issues (Response to the Department Questionnaire Concerning
Volume I of the Petition, dated April 14, 2008 (``Supp. Response'')),
one distinct submission on Korea-only material (Response to the
Department Questionnaire Concerning the Republic of Korea, dated April
14, 2008 (``Supp. Korea Response'')), and one distinct submission on
PRC-only material (Response to the Department Questionnaire Concerning
the People's Republic of China, dated April 14, 2008 (``Supp. PRC AD
Response'')). On April 16 and April 17, 2008, the Department called
Petitioners to request certain information relating to the Petition,
the Supp. Korea Response, and the Supp. PRC AD Response. See Memorandum
to the File from Meredith A.W. Rutherford,
[[Page 23189]]
Import Policy Analyst, regarding Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties--Certain Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People's Republic of China and the
Republic of Korea: Phone Call with Petitioner Regarding Industry
Support, dated April 16, 2008; Memorandum to the File from Juanita H.
Chen, Special Assistant to the SEC Office, through Edward C. Yang,
Director, SEC Office, AD/CVD Operations, China/NME Group, regarding
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People's
Republic of China: Request for Information, dated April 17, 2008; and
Memorandum to the File from Dena Crossland, Analyst, through Patrick
Edwards, Acting Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, regarding
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the Republic of
Korea: Request for Information, dated April 17, 2008. On April 18,
2008, Wheatland Tube Company, a U.S. manufacturer of welded line pipe,
filed a letter in support of the Petition. On April 21, 2008,
Petitioners filed additional information in response to the
Department's April 16, 2008, and April 17, 2008, request for
information. See Response to the Department's Second Request for
Additional Information Concerning the People's Republic of China and
the Republic of Korea, dated April 21, 2008 (``Second Supp.
Response''); Response to the Department's Second Request for Additional
Information Concerning the People's Republic of China, dated April 21,
2008 (``Second Supp. PRC AD Response''); and Response to the
Department's Second Request for Additional Information Concerning the
Republic of Korea, dated April 21, 2008 (``Second Supp. Korea
Response''). On April 21, 2008, The Department called Petitioners
regarding the scope language. See Memorandum to the File from Norbert
Gannon, Supervisory Import Policy Analyst, regarding Petitions for the
Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties--Certain Circular
Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People's Republic of
China and the Republic of Korea: Phone Call with Petitioner Regarding
Scope, dated April 21, 2008. Additionally, on April 21, 2008, Stupp
Corporation, a domestic producer of subject merchandise, filed a letter
in support of the Petition.
In accordance with section 732(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (``Act''), Petitioners allege that imports of welded line pipe
from Korea and the PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value, within the meaning of section
731 of the Act, and that such imports are materially injuring, or
threatening material injury to, an industry in the United States.
The Department finds that Petitioners filed the Petition on behalf
of the domestic industry because Petitioners are interested parties as
defined in sections 771(9)(C) and 771(9)(D) of the Act, and have
demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to the
antidumping duty investigations that Petitioners are requesting that
the Department initiate. See ``Determination of Industry Support for
the Petition'' section below.
Periods of Investigation
The period of investigation (``POI'') for Korea is April 1, 2007,
through March 31, 2008. The POI for the PRC is October 1, 2007, through
March 31, 2008. See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(1).
Scope of Investigations
The merchandise covered by each of these investigations is circular
welded carbon quality steel pipe of a kind used for oil and gas
pipelines (``welded line pipe''), not more that 406.4 mm (16 inches) in
outside diameter, regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish,
end finish or stenciling.
The term ``carbon quality steel'' includes both carbon steel and
carbon steel mixed with small amounts of alloying elements that may
exceed the individual weight limits for nonalloy steels imposed in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'').
Specifically, the term ``carbon quality'' includes products in which
(1) Iron predominates by weight over each of the other contained
elements, (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less by weight and (3)
none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity by weight
respectively indicated:
(i) 2.00 percent of manganese,
(ii) 2.25 percent of silicon,
(iii) 1.00 percent of copper,
(iv) 0.50 percent of aluminum,
(v) 1.25 percent of chromium,
(vi) 0.30 percent of cobalt,
(vii) 0.40 percent of lead,
(viii) 1.25 percent of nickel,
(ix) 0.30 percent of tungsten,
(x) 0.012 percent of boron,
(xi) 0.50 percent of molybdenum,
(xii) 0.15 percent of niobium,
(xiii) 0.41 percent of titanium,
(xiv) 0.15 percent of vanadium, or
(xv) 0.15 percent of zirconium.
Welded line pipe is normally produced to specifications published
by the American Petroleum Institute (``API'') (or comparable foreign
specifications) including API A-25, 5LA, 5LB, and X grades from 42 and
above, and/or any other proprietary grades or non-graded material.
Nevertheless, all pipe meeting the physical description set forth above
that is of a kind used in oil and gas pipelines, including all
multiple-stenciled pipe with an API line pipe stencil is covered by the
scope of these investigations.
The line pipe products that are the subject of these investigations
are currently classifiable in the HTSUS under subheadings
7306.19.10.10, 7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and 7306.19.51.50. While
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope of these investigations is
dispositive.
Comments on Scope of Investigations
During our review of the Petition, we discussed the scope with
Petitioners to ensure that it is an accurate reflection of the products
for which the domestic industry is seeking relief. The scope of these
investigations covers line pipe which, we recognize, may include
certain merchandise potentially subject to the on-going antidumping
(``AD'') and countervailing duty (``CVD'') investigations of circular
welded pipe (``CWP''). See Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe
from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value and Postponement of
Final Determination, 73 FR 2445 (January 15, 2008); see also Circular
Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination; Preliminary
Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances; and Alignment of
Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Final Antidumping Duty
Determination, 72 FR 63875 ( November 13, 2007). Given that the scope
issue has not been finally resolved in the CWP investigations, for
purposes of these initiations, we have defined the scope to include the
potential overlap. However, we intend to resolve the issue to ensure
that there will be no overlap between the scopes in the CWP and welded
line pipe cases. Moreover, as discussed in the preamble to the
regulations (Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule, 62
FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997)), we are setting aside a period for
interested parties to raise issues regarding product coverage. The
Department encourages all interested parties to submit such comments by
May 13, 2008, which is 20 calendar days
[[Page 23190]]
from the date of signature of this notice. Comments should be addressed
to Import Administration's APO/Dockets Unit, Room 1117, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20230. The period of scope consultations is to provide the Department
with ample opportunity to consider all comments and to consult with
parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary determinations.
Comments on Product Characteristics for Antidumping Duty Questionnaires
We are requesting comments from interested parties regarding the
appropriate physical characteristics of welded line pipe to be reported
in response to the Department's antidumping duty questionnaires. This
information will be used to identify the key physical characteristics
of the subject merchandise in order to more accurately report the
relevant factors and costs of production, as well as to develop
appropriate product comparison criteria.
Interested parties may provide any information or comments that
they feel are relevant to the development of an accurate listing of
physical characteristics. Specifically, they may provide comments as to
which characteristics are appropriate to use as (1) general product
characteristics and (2) the product comparison criteria. We note that
it is not always appropriate to use all product characteristics as
product comparison criteria. We base product comparison criteria on
meaningful commercial differences among products. In other words, while
there may be some physical product characteristics utilized by
manufacturers to describe welded line pipe, it may be that only a
select few product characteristics take into account commercially
meaningful physical characteristics. In addition, interested parties
may comment on the order in which the physical characteristics should
be used in product matching. Generally, the Department attempts to list
the most important physical characteristics first and the least
important characteristics last.
In order to consider the suggestions of interested parties in
developing and issuing the antidumping duty questionnaires, we must
receive comments at the above-referenced address by May 13, 2008.
Additionally, rebuttal comments addressing only those issues raised in
the comments must be received by May 20, 2008.
Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 732(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 732(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, the Department
shall: (i) Poll the industry or rely on other information in order to
determine if there is support for the petition, as required by
subparagraph (A), or (ii) determine industry support using a
statistically valid sampling method.
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs the Department to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The U.S. International Trade Commission
(``ITC''), which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic
industry'' has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a
domestic like product in order to define the industry. While both the
Department and the ITC must apply the same statutory definition
regarding the domestic like product (section 771(10) of the Act), they
do so for different purposes and pursuant to a separate and distinct
authority. In addition, the Department's determination is subject to
limitations of time and information. Although this may result in
different definitions of the like product, such differences do not
render the decision of either agency contrary to law. See USEC, Inc. v.
United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 2001), citing Algoma Steel
Corp. Ltd. v. United States, 688 F. Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd
865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989), cert. denied 492 U.S. 919 (1989).
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this subtitle.'' Thus, the reference point from which the
domestic like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
petition).
With regard to the domestic like product, Petitioners do not offer
a definition of domestic like product distinct from the scope of these
investigations. Based on our analysis of the information submitted on
the record, we have determined that welded line pipe constitutes a
single domestic like product and we have analyzed industry support in
terms of that domestic like product. For a discussion of the domestic
like product analysis in this case, see ``Antidumping Duty
Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea (Korea)'' (``Korea
Initiation Checklist''), Industry Support at Attachment II, and
``Antidumping Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain Circular
Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People's Republic of
China'' (``PRC Initiation Checklist''), Industry Support at Attachment
II, on file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Room 1117 of the
main Department of Commerce building.
With regard to section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act, in determining
whether Petitioners have standing (i.e., those domestic workers and
producers supporting the Petition account for (1) at least 25 percent
of the total production of the domestic like product and (2) more than
50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by
that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to,
the Petition), we considered the industry support data contained in the
Petition with reference to the domestic like product as defined in the
``Scope of Investigations'' section, above. To establish industry
support, Petitioners provided their shipments for the domestic like
product for the year 2007, and compared them to shipments of the
domestic like product for the industry. In the Petition, Petitioners
demonstrated the correlation between shipments and production and
argued that shipments are a good proxy for production. See Petition,
Volume I, at 3, and Exhibit 3b. Based on the fact that total industry
production data for the domestic like product for 2007 is not
reasonably available, and that Petitioners have established that
shipments are a reasonable proxy for production data, we have relied
upon shipment data for purposes of measuring industry support. For
further discussion, see Korea Initiation Checklist and PRC Initiation
[[Page 23191]]
Checklist at Attachment II (Industry Support).
The Department's review of the data provided in the Petition,
supplemental submissions, and other information readily available to
the Department indicates that Petitioners have established industry
support. First, the Petition establishes support from domestic
producers (or workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product and, as such, the Department is
not required to take further action in order to evaluate industry
support (e.g., polling). See section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act and Korea
Initiation Checklist and PRC Initiation Checklist at Attachment II
(Industry Support). Second, the domestic producers (or workers) have
met the statutory criteria for industry support under section
732(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers)
who support the Petition account for at least 25 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product. See Korea Initiation Checklist
and PRC Initiation Checklist at Attachment II (Industry Support).
Finally, the domestic producers (or workers) have met the statutory
criteria for industry support under section 732(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act
because the domestic producers (or workers) who support the Petition
account for more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the Petition. Accordingly, the Department
determines that the Petition was filed on behalf of the domestic
industry within the meaning of section 732(b)(1) of the Act. See Korea
Initiation Checklist and PRC Initiation Checklist at Attachment II
(Industry Support).
The Department finds that Petitioners filed the Petition on behalf
of the domestic industry because they are interested parties as defined
in sections 771(9)(C) and 771(9)(D) of the Act and have demonstrated
sufficient industry support with respect to the antidumping
investigation that they are requesting the Department initiate. See
Korea Initiation Checklist and PRC Initiation Checklist at Attachment
II (Industry Support).
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
Petitioners allege that the U.S. industry producing the domestic
like product is being materially injured, or is threatened with
material injury, by reason of the imports of the subject merchandise
sold at less than normal value (``NV''). Petitioners contend that the
industry's injured condition is illustrated by reduced market share,
underselling and price depressing and suppressing effects, lost sales
and revenues, a decline in financial performance, and an increase in
import penetration. We have assessed the allegations and supporting
evidence regarding material injury, threat of material injury, and
causation, and we have determined that these allegations are properly
supported by adequate evidence and meet the statutory requirements for
initiation. See Korea Initiation Checklist and PRC Initiation Checklist
at Attachment III.
Allegations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
The following is a description of the allegations of sales at less
than fair value (``LTFV'') upon which the Department based its decision
to initiate these investigations of imports of welded line pipe from
Korea and the PRC. The sources of data for the deductions and
adjustments relating to the U.S. price, NV (for Korea), and the factors
of production (for the PRC) are also discussed in the country-specific
initiation checklists. See Korea Initiation Checklist and PRC
Initiation Checklist. Should the need arise to use any of this
information as facts available under section 776 of the Act in our
preliminary or final determinations, we will reexamine the information
and revise the margin calculations, if appropriate.
Korea
Constructed Export Price (``CEP'')
Petitioners calculated two CEPs based on price quotes for Korean-
produced welded line pipe that was sold or offered for sale in the
United States during the POI. Petitioners claimed that CEP was
appropriate for Korea because the major Korean producers of welded line
pipe typically sell through affiliated offices in the United States
which, in turn, resell the welded line pipe to distributors in the
United States. See Petition, Volume IV, at Exhibit IV-1. Petitioners
made adjustments to the starting price for foreign inland freight,
ocean freight, marine insurance expenses, foreign and U.S. port
expenses, and estimated expenses that the affiliated distributor would
incur in selling merchandise on behalf of the Korean producer in the
United States. Foreign inland freight, ocean freight and insurance were
calculated as the difference between the value of welded line pipe
imports from Korea on a ``cost-insurance-freight'' (``CIF'') basis, and
the value of welded line pipe imports from Korea on a custom's value
basis as reported on the ITC's ``DataWeb'' at https://usitc.gov/tata/
hts/other/dataweb. Petitioners calculated foreign and U.S. port
expenses based on U.S. and Korean tariff schedule data. See Petition,
Volume IV, at Exhibits 7, 7a, and 7b. See Korea Initiation Checklist
for further discussion.
NV
Petitioners calculated NV based on home market prices for welded
line pipe produced in Korea and sold or offered for sale to customers
in Korea. Petitioners calculated the ex-factory NV for the home market
sales by converting the reported offer prices to a per-ton basis. See
Petition, Volume IV, at 9-12, and Korea Initiation Checklist for
further discussion.
PRC
EP
Petitioners calculated two EPs based on two price quotes for welded
line pipe from the PRC, offered for sale during the POI. Petitioners
made adjustments to the starting prices by deducting the costs
associated with exporting and delivering the product, including foreign
inland freight and ocean freight, insurance expenses, foreign and U.S.
port expenses and wharfage fees, and brokerage and handling expenses.
See PRC Initiation Checklist for further discussion.
NV
Petitioners note that the PRC is a non-market economy country
(``NME'') and, as the Department has not revoked this determination,
such status remains in effect today. See Petition, Volume II, at 11.
The Department has previously examined the PRC's market status and
determined that NME status should continue for the PRC. See Memorandum
from the Office of Policy to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, regarding The People's Republic of China Status
as a Non-Market Economy, dated May 15, 2006 (available online at http:/
/ia.ita.doc.gov/download/prc-nme-status/prc-nme-status-memo.pdf). In
addition, in recent investigations, the Department has continued to
determine that the PRC is an NME country. See Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Hexametaphosphate from The
People's Republic of China, 73 FR 6479 (February 4, 2008); Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Partial Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber
from the People's Republic of China, 72 FR 19690 (April
[[Page 23192]]
19, 2007); Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Certain Activated Carbon from the People's Republic of China, 72 FR
9508 (March 2, 2007).
In accordance with section 771(18)(C)(i) of the Act, the
presumption of NME status remains in effect until revoked by the
Department. The presumption of NME status for the PRC has not been
revoked by the Department and, therefore, remains in effect for
purposes of the initiation of this investigation. Accordingly, the NV
of the product is appropriately based on factors of production valued
in a surrogate market economy country, in accordance with section
773(c) of the Act. In the course of the PRC investigation, all parties
will have the opportunity to provide relevant information related to
the issues of the PRC's NME status and the granting of separate rates
to individual exporters.
Petitioners argue that India is the appropriate surrogate country
for the PRC because it is at a comparable level of economic development
and it is a significant producer of welded line pipe. See Petition,
Volume II, at 12. Based on the information provided by Petitioners, the
Department believes that the use of India as a surrogate country is
appropriate for purposes of initiation. However, after initiation of
the investigation, interested parties will have the opportunity to
submit comments regarding surrogate country selection and, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(i), will be provided an opportunity to submit
publicly available information to value factors of production within 40
days after the date of publication of the preliminary determination.
Petitioners calculated NV and dumping margins for the two U.S.
prices, discussed above, using the Department's NME methodology as
required by 19 CFR 351.202(b)(7)(i)(C) and 19 CFR 351.408. Petitioners
calculated NV based on Company A's consumption rates for producing
welded line pipe, arguing that it is the best information reasonably
available to Petitioners.\1\ See PRC Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The identity of Company A is proprietary information;
further discussion of Company A is available in the initiation
checklist. See PRC Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petitioners valued the factors of production to produce welded line
pipe based on reasonably available, public surrogate country data,
including India import data from the Monthly Statistics of the Foreign
Trade of India, and prices from Energy Prices & Taxes: Second Quarter
2003, published by the International Energy Agency. Petitioners
calculated labor cost using rates posted on the Department's Web site.
Where Petitioners were unable to find input prices from a period
contemporaneous with the POI, Petitioners adjusted for inflation using
the wholesale price index for India, as published in the International
Monetary Fund Publication ``International Financial Statistics.'' See
Petition, Volume II, at 19 and Exhibit II-8. Petitioners made currency
conversions, where necessary, using a simple average of the rupee/U.S.
dollar exchange rate for the POI, as reported on the Department's Web
site. See Petition, Volume II, at 19; Supp. PRC AD Response, at Exhibit
Supp-9. While Petitioners calculated movement expenses using
information from the Department of Commerce and the ITC, Petitioners
did not include freight expenses in their calculation of surrogate
values for the PRC because they could not determine the correct
distance necessary for the calculations. See Petition, Volume II, at
19-20; Supp. PRC AD Response, at Exhibit Supp-9. For purposes of
initiation, the Department determines that the surrogate values used by
Petitioners are reasonably available and, thus, acceptable. However,
the Department modified the surrogate value that Petitioners calculated
for hot-rolled steel coil. See PRC Initiation Checklist.
Petitioners based factory overhead expenses, selling, general and
administrative (``SG&A'') expenses, and profit, on financial data from
the 2006-2007 annual reports of Tata Steel Limited, Jindal SAW Ltd.
(``Jindal''), and Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd., Indian producers of
welded steel pipe using steel sheet in coils. See Petition, Volume II,
at 22-25; Supp. PRC AD Response at Exhibit Supp-9. We recalculated
factory overhead expenses, SG&A expenses, and profit using only
Jindal's data because of the three potential surrogate companies, only
Jindal's financial data were from a period that overlapped with the
POI. In addition, we revised the financial ratios that Petitioners
calculated from Jindal's data to account for expenses that were omitted
from Petitioner's calculation. See PRC Initiation Checklist.
Fair Value Comparisons
Based on the data provided by Petitioners, with adjustments as
requested by the Department, there is reason to believe that imports of
welded line pipe from Korea and the PRC are being, or are likely to be,
sold in the United States at less than fair value. Based on a
comparison of CEP and NV, calculated in accordance with sections 772(b)
and 773(a)(1) of the Act, respectively, estimated dumping margins for
welded line pipe from Korea range from 41.69 percent to 42.75 percent.
See Korea Initiation Checklist. Based on a comparison of EP and NV,
calculated in accordance with sections 772(a) and 773(c) of the Act,
respectively, the revised estimated dumping margins for welded line
pipe from the PRC range from 57.45 percent to 58.96 percent. See PRC
Initiation Checklist.
Initiation of Antidumping Investigations
Based upon the examination of the Petition on welded line pipe from
Korea and the PRC, the Department finds that the Petition meets the
requirements of section 732 of the Act. Therefore, we are initiating
antidumping duty investigations to determine whether imports of welded
line pipe from Korea and the PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold
in the United States at less than fair value. In accordance with
section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Act, unless postponed, we intend to make
our preliminary determinations no later than 140 days after the date of
this initiation.
Respondent Selection for Korea
For the Korean investigation, the Department intends to select
respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data
for U.S. imports during the POI. We intend to release the CBP data
under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to all parties with
access to information protected by APO within five days of publication
of this Federal Register notice, and make our decision regarding
respondent selection within 20 days of publication of this notice. The
Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent
selection within 10 days of publication of this Federal Register
notice.
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Instructions for filing such
applications may be found on the Department's Web site at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/apo.
Respondent Selection for the PRC
In the PRC investigation, the Department will request quantity and
value information from all known exporters and producers identified,
with complete contact information, in the Petition. The quantity and
value data received from these exporters/producers will be used as the
basis to select the mandatory respondents. The
[[Page 23193]]
Department requires that the respondents submit a response to both the
quantity and value questionnaire and the separate-rate application by
the respective deadlines in order to receive consideration for
separate-rate status. See Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure
Pipe from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping
Duty Investigation, 73 FR 10221, 10225 (February 26, 2008); and
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Certain Artist Canvas
From the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 21996, 21999 (April 28,
2005). Attachment I of this notice contains the quantity and value
questionnaire that must be submitted by all NME exporters/producers no
later than May 14, 2008. In addition, the Department will post the
quantity and value questionnaire along with the filing instructions on
the Import Administration Web site, at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/ia-
highlights-and-news.html. The Department will send the quantity and
value questionnaire to those PRC companies identified, with complete
contact information, in the Petition, Volume I, at Exhibit 6a, and in
the Supp. PRC AD Response, at Supp-1.
Separate Rates
In order to obtain separate-rate status in NME investigations,
exporters and producers must submit a separate-rate status application.
See Policy Bulletin 05.1: Separate-Rates Practice and Application of
Combination Rates in Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market
Economy Countries (April 5, 2005) (``Separate Rates/Combination Rates
Bulletin''), available on the Department's Web site at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf. The specific requirements for
submitting the separate-rate application in this investigation are
outlined in detail in the application itself, available on the
Department's Web site at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/ia-highlights-and-
news.html on the date of publication of this initiation notice in the
Federal Register. The separate-rate application will be due 60 days
from publication of this notice.
Use of Combination Rates in an NME Investigation
The Department will calculate combination rates for certain
respondents that are eligible for a separate rate in this
investigation. The Separate Rates/Combination Rates Bulletin states:
{w{time} hile continuing the practice of assigning separate
rates only to exporters, all separate rates that the Department will
now assign in its NME investigations will be specific to those
producers that supplied the exporter during the period of
investigation. Note, however, that one rate is calculated for the
exporter and all of the producers which supplied subject merchandise
to it during the period of investigation. This practice applies both
to mandatory respondents receiving an individually calculated
separate rate as well as the pool of non-investigated firms
receiving the weighted-average of the individually calculated rates.
This practice is referred to as the application of ``combination
rates'' because such rates apply to specific combinations of
exporters and one or more producers. The cash-deposit rate assigned
to an exporter will apply only to merchandise both exported by the
firm in question and produced by a firm that supplied the exporter
during the period of investigation.
See Separate Rates/Combination Rates Bulletin, at 6.
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section 732(b)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), copies of the public version of the Petition have been
provided to the representatives of the Governments of Korea and the
PRC. Because of the particularly large number of producers/exporters
identified in the Petition, the Department considers the service of the
public version of the Petition to the foreign producers/exporters
satisfied by the delivery of the public version to the Governments of
Korea and the PRC, consistent with 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
International Trade Commission Notification
We have notified the ITC of our initiations, as required by section
732(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determinations by the International Trade Commission
The ITC will preliminarily determine, no later than May 19, 2008,
whether there is a reasonable indication that imports of welded line
pipe from Korea and the PRC are materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, a U.S. industry. A negative ITC determination with
respect to either of the investigations will result in that
investigation being terminated; otherwise, these investigations will
proceed according to statutory and regulatory time limits.
This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 777(i) of
the Act.
Dated: April 23, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Attachment I
Where it is not practicable to examine all known producers/
exporters of subject merchandise, section 777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act
of 1930 (as amended) permits us to investigate 1) a sample of
exporters, producers, or types of products that is statistically valid
based on the information available at the time of selection, or 2)
exporters and producers accounting for the largest volume and value of
the subject merchandise that can reasonably be examined.
In the chart below, please provide the total quantity and total
value of all of your sales of merchandise covered by the scope of this
investigation (see attachment II of this document), produced in the
PRC, and exported/shipped to the United States during the period
October 1, 2007 through March 31, 2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Terms of
Market quantity sale Total value
------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Export Price Sales............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.
a. Exporter name.............
b. Address...................
c. Contact...................
d. Phone No..................
e. Fax No....................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Constructed Export Price Sales
[[Page 23194]]
4. Further Manufactured Sales....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Sales..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the scope of this investigation may include certain
merchandise potentially subject to the on-going antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations of circular welded pipe, we also
request that you identify, in the chart below, the total quantity and
total value that was reported in the above chart for sales of the
following merchandise:
Pipe multiple-stenciled to a standard and/or structural
specification and to any other specification, such as the American
Petroleum Institute (``API'') API-5L specification, when it meets the
physical description set forth in the scope description in the circular
welded pipe cases (see Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from
the People's Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination,
73 FR 2445 (January 15, 2008)) and also has one or more of the
following characteristics: is 32 feet in length or less; is less than
2.0 inches (50 mm) in outside diameter; has a galvanized and/or painted
surface finish; or has a threaded and/or coupled end finish.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Terms of
Market quantity sale Total value
------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Export Price Sales............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.
a. Exporter name.............
b. Address...................
c. Contact...................
d. Phone No..................
e. Fax No....................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Constructed Export Price Sales
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Further Manufactured Sales....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Sales..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Quantity:
Please report quantity on a metric ton basis. If any
conversions were used, please provide the conversion formula and
source.
Terms of Sales:
Please report all sales on the same terms (e.g., free on
board--port of export).
Total Value:
All sales values should be reported in U.S. dollars.
Please indicate any exchange rates used and their respective dates and
sources.
Export Price Sales:
Generally, a U.S. sale is classified as an export price
sale when the first sale to an unaffiliated person occurs before
importation into the United States.
Please include any sales exported by your company directly
to the United States.
Please include any sales exported by your company to a
third-country market economy reseller where you had knowledge that the
merchandise was destined to be resold to the United States.
If you are a producer of subject merchandise, please
include any sales manufactured by your company that were subsequently
exported by an affiliated exporter to the United States.
Please do not include any sales of merchandise
manufactured in Hong Kong in your figures.
Constructed Export Price Sales:
Generally, a U.S. sale is classified as a constructed
export price sale when the first sale to an unaffiliated person occurs
after importation. However, if the first sale to the unaffiliated
person is made by a person in the United States affiliated with the
foreign exporter, constructed export price applies even if the sale
occurs prior to importation.
Please include any sales exported by your company directly
to the United States.
Please include any sales exported by your company to a
third-country market economy reseller where you had knowledge that the
merchandise was destined to be resold to the United States.
If you are a producer of subject merchandise, please
include any sales manufactured by your company that were subsequently
exported by an affiliated exporter to the United States.
Please do not include any sales of merchandise
manufactured in Hong Kong in your figures.
Further Manufactured Sales:
Sales of further manufactured or assembled (including re-
packaged) merchandise are sales of merchandise that undergoes further
manufacture or assembly in the United States before being sold to the
first unaffiliated customer.
Further manufacture or assembly costs include amounts
incurred for direct materials, labor and overhead, plus amounts for
general and administrative expense, interest expense, and additional
packing expense incurred in the country of further manufacture, as well
as all costs involved in moving the product from the U.S. port of entry
to the further manufacturer.
[FR Doc. E8-9361 Filed 4-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P