Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 21990-21992 [E8-8775]
Download as PDF
21990
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 23, 2008 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC this 10th day of
April 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–8776 Filed 4–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,619; TA–W–62,619A]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
OEM/Erie, Inc., Including On-Site
Leased Workers From Career
Concepts Staffing Services Erie, PA;
Including an Employee in Support of
OEM/Erie, Inc., Erie, PA Operating Out
of Madision Heights, MI: Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on March 3,
2008, applicable to workers of OEM/
Erie, Inc., including on-site leased
workers from Career Concepts Staffing
Services, Erie, Pennsylvania. The notice
was published in the Federal Register
on March 21, 2008 (73 FR 15217).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm.
New information shows that a worker
separation has occurred involving an
employee in support of the Erie,
Pennsylvania facility of OEM/Erie, Inc.
operating out of Madison Heights,
Michigan. Mr. Edward Conger provided
engineering functions supporting the
production of plastic trim automotive
parts that was produced at the Erie,
Pennsylvania facility of the subject firm.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include an employee in
support of the Erie, Pennsylvania
facility operating out of Madison
Heights, Michigan.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
OEM/Erie, Inc., Erie, Pennsylvania who
were adversely affected by increased
imports.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–62,619 is hereby issued as
follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
All workers of OEM/Erie, Inc., including
on-site leased workers from Career Concepts
Staffing Services, Erie, Pennsylvania (TA–W–
62,619) including an employee in support of
OEM/Erie, Inc., Erie, Pennsylvania operating
out of Madison Heights, Michigan (TA–W–
62,619A), who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
December 13, 2006, through March 3, 2010,
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974,
and are also eligible to apply for alternative
trade adjustment assistance under Section
246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of
April 2008.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–8779 Filed 4–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of April 7 through April 11, 2008.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of section 222(a)
of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of section 222(b)
of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 23, 2008 / Notices
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–63,133; Mitch Murch’s
Maintenance Management, Working
on-site at Briggs & Stratton Corp.,
Rolla, MO: January 25, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–62,755; G4 Products, LLC,
Formerly known as Geiger
Manufactured Products Group,
Lewiston, ME: January 17, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
TA–W–62,933; A.H. Schreiber
Company, Inc., Gordon Garment
Div., Atwork & Bright Services,
Bristol, VA: March 28, 2008.
TA–W–63,100; Chillicothe Paper, Inc., A
Subsidiary of Newpage Corporation,
Chillicothe, OH: April 1, 2007.
TA–W–63,112; Wolverine Finance, LLC,
Wolverine Tube, including workers
residing in Alabama, Ardmore, TN:
March 31, 2007.
TA–W–63,122; Chromcraft Revington,
Inc., Formerly known as Peters
Revington Furniture, Delphi, IN:
April 2, 2007.
TA–W–62,936; Bradford Dyeing
Association, Inc., Bradford, RI:
February 28, 2007.
TA–W–63,089; Garment Technology,
Inc., Signum, LLC, Gaffney, SC:
March 27, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–62,956; General Mills, Inc., Old
El Paso Meals Division, Poplar, WI:
March 3, 2007.
TA–W–62,960; Russell Corporation,
Spalding/Huff Sports Division,
Sussex, WI: April 22, 2008.
TA–W–62,984; Saint-Gobain Sekurit,
on-site leased workers of HCS
Resource, Shelby Township, MI:
March 5, 2007.
TA–W–62,996; Vanity Fair Brands, LP,
New York Office, New York, NY:
March 10, 2007.
TA–W–62,996A; Vanity Fair Brands, LP,
Alpharetta, GA: March 10, 2007.
TA–W–63,043; Grammer Industries,
Inc., A Subsidiary of Grammer AG,
Automotive Division, on-site leased
workers of Corestaff Services,
Piedmont, SC: March 20, 2007.
TA–W–63,043A; Grammer Industries,
Inc., A Subsidiary of Grammer AG,
Sales and Engineering Office, onsite leased workers of Westaff, Troy,
MI: March 20, 2007.
TA–W–63,086; K-Industries, USA, LLC,
Riviera Beach, FL: March 27, 2007.
TA–W–63,114; Colgate-Palmolive, onsite workers of Adecco,
Jeffersonville, IN: March 24, 2008.
TA–W–63,118; ARC Automotive, Inc., A
Subsidiary of Sequa Corporation,
Knoxville, TN: April 1, 2007.
TA–W–63,006; Air Products and
Chemicals, Polyurethane Chemicals
Division, Paulsboro, NJ: March 17,
2007.
TA–W–63,028; Fujifilm Manufacturing
U.S.A., Inc., on-site leased workers
of Staffsource, Inc., Greenwood, SC:
February 19, 2007.
TA–W–63,135; Leica Geosystems HDS,
LLC, Leica Geosystems, Inc., Bus.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21991
Unit, Aerotek, San Ramon, CA:
April 2, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–W–62,915; Furniture Makers Supply
Company, Lexington, NC: February
21, 2007.
TA–W–62,916; Lexington Abrasive Belts,
Subsidiary of Furniture Makers
Supply Co., Lexington, NC:
February 21, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. The firm does not have a
significant number of workers 50 years
of age or older.
TA–W–63,133; Mitch Murch’s
Maintenance Management, Working
on-site at Briggs & Stratton Corp.,
Rolla, MO:
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
21992
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 23, 2008 / Notices
TA–W–63,009; RSA, The Security
Division of EMC, A Subsidiary of
EMC, Bedford, MA.
TA–W–63,094; J J’s Mae, Inc., dba
Rainbeau, San Francisco, CA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–62,908; U.S. Timber Company,
Baker City, OR.
TA–W–62,995; RSDC of Michigan, LLC,
Holt, MI.
TA–W–63,030; Daisy Outdoor Products,
Neosho, MO.
TA–W–63,010; Rotor Coaters
International, leased workers of
Trillium Staffing and Poch Staffing,
Saginaw, MI.
TA–W–63,101; Modern Textile, Inc.,
Oakville, CT.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–62,706; TJD Fabrications, Inc.,
Plattsburgh, NY.
TA–W–62,989; Rexel, Inc., Branch 3210/
Division Office, Rocky Mountain
Division, Denver, CO.
TA–W–63,054; Skynet Satellite
Corporation, Formerly known as
Loral Skynet Corp., A Subsidiary of
Telesat, Hawley, PA.
TA–W–63,061; Springs Global, US, Inc.,
Spring Direct Division, Lancaster,
SC.
TA–W–63,075; Russound, Also know as
Folded Metal Products, Inc.,
Newmarket, NH.
TA–W–63,095; Western Union Financial
Services, Inc., Bridgeton, MO.
TA–W–63,103; HD Supply, Inc.,
Plumbing and HVAC Division,
Columbus, GA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of April 7
through April 11, 2008. Copies of these
determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
mailed to persons who write to the
above address.
Dated: April 17, 2008.
Erin Fitzgerald,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–8775 Filed 4–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,752]
Dynamerica Manufacturing, LLC,
Muncie, IN; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On April 1, 2008, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of the subject firm. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on April 11, 2008 (73 FR
19896).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
finding that criteria I.B. and II.B. have
not been met. There were no plant sales
or production declines nor was there as
shift in production from the subject firm
abroad.
In the request for reconsideration the
petitioner stated that he did not have
exact knowledge of the subject firm’s
sales or production, but alleged that
‘‘DynAmerica was and still is struggling
financially’’ and provided a history of
the declining employment at the subject
firm.
On reconsideration, the Department
contacted a company official to address
these allegations. The official confirmed
the accuracy of the statements released
by the subject firm in the initial
investigation regarding sales and
production at Dynamerica
Manufacturing LLC, Muncie, Indiana.
Furthermore, the company official
provided additional financial
documentation supporting the facts that
sales and production at the subject firm
increased from 2006 to 2007.
The petitioner further stated that the
subject firm acquired a facility in
Mexico and alleged that production has
been shifted from Muncie facility to
Mexico. In particular, the petitioner
alleged, that the subject firm ‘‘shipped
presses and multislides to Mexico and
the dies to make parts that they were
running at DynAmerica.’’
The company official stated that
Dynamerica Manufacturing LLC
manufactures metal stampings in the
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
plant in Mexico. The official
emphasized that metal stampings
manufactured in Mexico are not like or
directly competitive with automotive
safety components manufactured at
Muncie plant.
Furthermore, the company official
stated that there was no shift in
production of automotive safety
components from Dynamerica
Manufacturing LLC, Muncie, Indiana to
Mexico in 2006 and 2007. The
machinery mentioned by the petitioner
in the request for reconsideration were
purchased by Dynamerica specifically
for its Mexican facility. The
documentation shows that this
machinery was shipped to Muncie plant
for maintenance, safety and fit of tooling
prior to being shipped to Mexico. ‘‘Once
the tool was debugged in the press, the
tool and press was shipped Mexico.’’
The official stated that the reason for the
workers separations is related to a
domestic shift in plant production.
The investigation on reconsideration
revealed that sales and production and
the subject firm increased from 2006 to
2007 and that there was no shift in
production abroad of articles like or
directly competitive with the products
manufactured by workers of the subject
firm.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of
Dynamerica Manufacturing, LLC,
Muncie, Indiana.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of
April, 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–8780 Filed 4–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,613]
Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging,
Inc., Longview Mill, Formerly Fibre
Company, Longview, WA; Notice of
Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
By application dated March 28, 2008,
a petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21990-21992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8775]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of April 7
through April 11, 2008.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
[[Page 21991]]
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-63,133; Mitch Murch's Maintenance Management, Working on-site at
Briggs & Stratton Corp., Rolla, MO: January 25, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-62,755; G4 Products, LLC, Formerly known as Geiger Manufactured
Products Group, Lewiston, ME: January 17, 2007.
TA-W-62,933; A.H. Schreiber Company, Inc., Gordon Garment Div., Atwork
& Bright Services, Bristol, VA: March 28, 2008.
TA-W-63,100; Chillicothe Paper, Inc., A Subsidiary of Newpage
Corporation, Chillicothe, OH: April 1, 2007.
TA-W-63,112; Wolverine Finance, LLC, Wolverine Tube, including workers
residing in Alabama, Ardmore, TN: March 31, 2007.
TA-W-63,122; Chromcraft Revington, Inc., Formerly known as Peters
Revington Furniture, Delphi, IN: April 2, 2007.
TA-W-62,936; Bradford Dyeing Association, Inc., Bradford, RI: February
28, 2007.
TA-W-63,089; Garment Technology, Inc., Signum, LLC, Gaffney, SC: March
27, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-62,956; General Mills, Inc., Old El Paso Meals Division, Poplar,
WI: March 3, 2007.
TA-W-62,960; Russell Corporation, Spalding/Huff Sports Division,
Sussex, WI: April 22, 2008.
TA-W-62,984; Saint-Gobain Sekurit, on-site leased workers of HCS
Resource, Shelby Township, MI: March 5, 2007.
TA-W-62,996; Vanity Fair Brands, LP, New York Office, New York, NY:
March 10, 2007.
TA-W-62,996A; Vanity Fair Brands, LP, Alpharetta, GA: March 10, 2007.
TA-W-63,043; Grammer Industries, Inc., A Subsidiary of Grammer AG,
Automotive Division, on-site leased workers of Corestaff Services,
Piedmont, SC: March 20, 2007.
TA-W-63,043A; Grammer Industries, Inc., A Subsidiary of Grammer AG,
Sales and Engineering Office, on-site leased workers of Westaff, Troy,
MI: March 20, 2007.
TA-W-63,086; K-Industries, USA, LLC, Riviera Beach, FL: March 27, 2007.
TA-W-63,114; Colgate-Palmolive, on-site workers of Adecco,
Jeffersonville, IN: March 24, 2008.
TA-W-63,118; ARC Automotive, Inc., A Subsidiary of Sequa Corporation,
Knoxville, TN: April 1, 2007.
TA-W-63,006; Air Products and Chemicals, Polyurethane Chemicals
Division, Paulsboro, NJ: March 17, 2007.
TA-W-63,028; Fujifilm Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc., on-site leased
workers of Staffsource, Inc., Greenwood, SC: February 19, 2007.
TA-W-63,135; Leica Geosystems HDS, LLC, Leica Geosystems, Inc., Bus.
Unit, Aerotek, San Ramon, CA: April 2, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA-W-62,915; Furniture Makers Supply Company, Lexington, NC: February
21, 2007.
TA-W-62,916; Lexington Abrasive Belts, Subsidiary of Furniture Makers
Supply Co., Lexington, NC: February 21, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50
years of age or older.
TA-W-63,133; Mitch Murch's Maintenance Management, Working on-site at
Briggs & Stratton Corp., Rolla, MO:
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
[[Page 21992]]
TA-W-63,009; RSA, The Security Division of EMC, A Subsidiary of EMC,
Bedford, MA.
TA-W-63,094; J J's Mae, Inc., dba Rainbeau, San Francisco, CA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-62,908; U.S. Timber Company, Baker City, OR.
TA-W-62,995; RSDC of Michigan, LLC, Holt, MI.
TA-W-63,030; Daisy Outdoor Products, Neosho, MO.
TA-W-63,010; Rotor Coaters International, leased workers of Trillium
Staffing and Poch Staffing, Saginaw, MI.
TA-W-63,101; Modern Textile, Inc., Oakville, CT.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-62,706; TJD Fabrications, Inc., Plattsburgh, NY.
TA-W-62,989; Rexel, Inc., Branch 3210/Division Office, Rocky Mountain
Division, Denver, CO.
TA-W-63,054; Skynet Satellite Corporation, Formerly known as Loral
Skynet Corp., A Subsidiary of Telesat, Hawley, PA.
TA-W-63,061; Springs Global, US, Inc., Spring Direct Division,
Lancaster, SC.
TA-W-63,075; Russound, Also know as Folded Metal Products, Inc.,
Newmarket, NH.
TA-W-63,095; Western Union Financial Services, Inc., Bridgeton, MO.
TA-W-63,103; HD Supply, Inc., Plumbing and HVAC Division, Columbus, GA.
The investigation revealed that criteria of section 222(b)(2) has
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of April 7 through April 11, 2008. Copies of these
determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to
the above address.
Dated: April 17, 2008.
Erin Fitzgerald,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-8775 Filed 4-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P