Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 20953-20954 [E8-8244]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 75 / Thursday, April 17, 2008 / Notices
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: April 14, 2008.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E8–8279 Filed 4–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
sroberts on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of March 31 through April 4,
2008.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of section 222(a)
of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 Apr 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of section 222(b)
of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20953
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–62,888; Johnson Controls, Inc.,
Foamech Plant, Georgetown, KY:
February 21, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–62,917; Fallon Luminous
Products Corp., Spartanburg, SC:
February 27, 2007.
TA–W–62,925; Domtar Corporation
Paper and Pulp Mill, Port Edwards,
WI: February 27, 2007.
TA–W–63,008; Burley Design LLC,
Leased Workers of Labor Ready and
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
sroberts on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
20954
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 75 / Thursday, April 17, 2008 / Notices
Personnel Source, Eugene, OR:
March 14, 2007.
TA–W–62,583; Peoploungers, Nettleton,
MS: December 18, 2006.
TA–W–62,756; Waco Scaffolding and
Equipment, Cleveland, OH: January
28, 2007.
TA–W–62,835; Panasonic Shikoku
Electronics Corp. of America,
Express Personnel Services,
Vancouver, WA: March 22, 2008.
TA–W–62,886; Smith Jones, Inc., b/d/a
Midwest Manufacturing Company,
Kellogg, IA: July 26, 2007.
TA–W–62,914; Carrollton Specialties
Products, Carrollton, MO: February
20, 2007.
TA–W–63,046; Alcoa Incorporated,
Alcoa Wheel & Transportation
Productions, Adecco Manpower,
Beloit, WI: March 19, 2007.
TA–W–62,975; Catherine Coatney
Design, San Francisco, CA: March
7, 2007.
TA–W–63,087; G8 Fashion, Inc., New
York, NY: March 19, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–62,850; Magnesium Aluminum
Corporation, Alliance Staffing
Solutions, Cleveland, OH: February
13, 2007.
TA–W–62,897; Motorola, Inc., Fort
Worth, TX: March 17, 2008.
TA–W–62,929; Delphi Corporation,
Including Enhanced Manufacturing,
Columbia, TN: February 20, 2007.
TA–W–62,967; Riverside Manufacturing
Company, Wadley Plant, Wadley,
GA: March 5, 2007.
TA–W–63,033; Lear Corporation,
Roscommon, MI: March 13, 2007.
TA–W–63,044; Springs Global US, Inc.,
Piedmont Bedding Division,
Piedmont, AL: April 5, 2008.
TA–W–63,056; Eaton Corporation, Fuel
Emission & Safety Controls, Kelly
Aerotek, Accountemps, Oxford, MI:
March 18, 2007.
TA–W–63,064; Evolutionary Concepts,
Inc., Division of ITT Corporation,
San Dimas, CA: March 22, 2007.
TA–W–62,962; Copeland Corporation,
Leased Workers From Personal
Services Unlimited, Shelby, NC:
April 7, 2008.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–W–63,073; Oberg Industries,
Chandler, AZ: March 25, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 Apr 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of section 246 has not been
met. The firm does not have a
significant number of workers 50 years
of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–62,888; Johnson Controls, Inc.,
Foamech Plant, Georgetown, KY.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–63,042; Lemco Mills, Inc.,
Burlington, NC.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–61,966; Chemtura Corporation,
Morgantown, WV.
TA–W–62,687; Georgia-Pacific
Corporation, Plywood Plant,
Crossett, AR.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TA–W–62,839; Inverness Corporation,
Fairlawn, NJ.
TA–W–62,843; Dematic Corporation,
Formerly Siemens Dematic, Grand
Rapids, MI.
TA–W–62,976; Erie County Plastics
Incorporated, Corry, PA.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–62,809; Edwards Vacuum, Inc.,
Wilmington, MA.
TA–W–63,016; Electronic Data Systems,
Vendor Management Center,
Dayton, OH.
TA–W–63,062; Donna’s Distribution,
Chicago, IL.
TA–W–63,065; Power-One, Inc., Design
Engineering Department, Andover,
MA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of March 31
through April 4, 2008. Copies of these
determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be
mailed to persons who write to the
above address.
Dated: April 11, 2008.
Erin Fitzgerald,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–8244 Filed 4–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221 (a) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 75 (Thursday, April 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20953-20954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8244]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of March 31
through April 4, 2008.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-62,888; Johnson Controls, Inc., Foamech Plant, Georgetown, KY:
February 21, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-62,917; Fallon Luminous Products Corp., Spartanburg, SC: February
27, 2007.
TA-W-62,925; Domtar Corporation Paper and Pulp Mill, Port Edwards, WI:
February 27, 2007.
TA-W-63,008; Burley Design LLC, Leased Workers of Labor Ready and
[[Page 20954]]
Personnel Source, Eugene, OR: March 14, 2007.
TA-W-62,583; Peoploungers, Nettleton, MS: December 18, 2006.
TA-W-62,756; Waco Scaffolding and Equipment, Cleveland, OH: January 28,
2007.
TA-W-62,835; Panasonic Shikoku Electronics Corp. of America, Express
Personnel Services, Vancouver, WA: March 22, 2008.
TA-W-62,886; Smith Jones, Inc., b/d/a Midwest Manufacturing Company,
Kellogg, IA: July 26, 2007.
TA-W-62,914; Carrollton Specialties Products, Carrollton, MO: February
20, 2007.
TA-W-63,046; Alcoa Incorporated, Alcoa Wheel & Transportation
Productions, Adecco Manpower, Beloit, WI: March 19, 2007.
TA-W-62,975; Catherine Coatney Design, San Francisco, CA: March 7,
2007.
TA-W-63,087; G8 Fashion, Inc., New York, NY: March 19, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-62,850; Magnesium Aluminum Corporation, Alliance Staffing
Solutions, Cleveland, OH: February 13, 2007.
TA-W-62,897; Motorola, Inc., Fort Worth, TX: March 17, 2008.
TA-W-62,929; Delphi Corporation, Including Enhanced Manufacturing,
Columbia, TN: February 20, 2007.
TA-W-62,967; Riverside Manufacturing Company, Wadley Plant, Wadley, GA:
March 5, 2007.
TA-W-63,033; Lear Corporation, Roscommon, MI: March 13, 2007.
TA-W-63,044; Springs Global US, Inc., Piedmont Bedding Division,
Piedmont, AL: April 5, 2008.
TA-W-63,056; Eaton Corporation, Fuel Emission & Safety Controls, Kelly
Aerotek, Accountemps, Oxford, MI: March 18, 2007.
TA-W-63,064; Evolutionary Concepts, Inc., Division of ITT Corporation,
San Dimas, CA: March 22, 2007.
TA-W-62,962; Copeland Corporation, Leased Workers From Personal
Services Unlimited, Shelby, NC: April 7, 2008.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA-W-63,073; Oberg Industries, Chandler, AZ: March 25, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of section 246 has
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50
years of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-62,888; Johnson Controls, Inc., Foamech Plant, Georgetown, KY.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
TA-W-63,042; Lemco Mills, Inc., Burlington, NC.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-61,966; Chemtura Corporation, Morgantown, WV.
TA-W-62,687; Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plywood Plant, Crossett, AR.
TA-W-62,839; Inverness Corporation, Fairlawn, NJ.
TA-W-62,843; Dematic Corporation, Formerly Siemens Dematic, Grand
Rapids, MI.
TA-W-62,976; Erie County Plastics Incorporated, Corry, PA.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-62,809; Edwards Vacuum, Inc., Wilmington, MA.
TA-W-63,016; Electronic Data Systems, Vendor Management Center, Dayton,
OH.
TA-W-63,062; Donna's Distribution, Chicago, IL.
TA-W-63,065; Power-One, Inc., Design Engineering Department, Andover,
MA.
The investigation revealed that criteria of section 222(b)(2) has
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of March 31 through April 4, 2008. Copies of these
determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to
the above address.
Dated: April 11, 2008.
Erin Fitzgerald,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-8244 Filed 4-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P