Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 19898-19900 [E8-7743]

Download as PDF 19898 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices Adjustment Assistance on September 5, 2006, applicable to workers of Solectron Corporation, Design and Engineering, Charlotte, North Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 21, 2006 (71 FR 55218). At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of test equipment used in the development of printed circuit boards and electronic storage. New information shows that Flextronics America, LLC purchased Solectron Corporation in October 2007 and is currently known as Flextronics America, LLC. Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to show that Solectron Corporation is currently known as Flextronics America, LLC. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of Solectron Corporation, Design and Engineering, currently known as Flextronics America, LLC who were adversely affected by a shift in production of test equipment to Mexico and China. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–59,639 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Solectron Corporation, currently known as Flextronics America, LLC, Design and Engineering, Charlotte, North Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 7, 2005, through September 5, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of April 2008. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E8–7733 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am] mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–59,283; TA–W–59,283A] Staktek Group L.P., Currently Known as Entorian Technologies L.P., Austin, TX; Including an Employee of Staktek Group L.P., Currently Known as Entorian Technologies L.P., Austin, TX Located In Poughquag, NY; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and a Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on June 7, 2006, applicable to workers of Staktek Group L.P., Austin, Texas. The notice was published in the Federal Register on July 14, 2006 (71 FR 40159). At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of stacked memory chips. New information shows that following a corporate decision, as of March 5, 2008, Staktek Group L.P. is now known as Entorian Technologies L.P. Workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Entorian Technologies L.P. Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of Staktek Group L.P., currently known as Entorian Technologies L.P. who were adversely affected by a shift in production of stacked memory chips to Mexico. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–59,283 and TA–W–59,283A are hereby issued as follows: All workers of Staktek Group L.P., currently known as Entorian Technologies L.P., Austin, Texas (TA–W–59,283), and including an employee located in Poughquag, New York (TA–W–59,283A), who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 25, 2005, VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:21 Apr 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 through June 7, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974. I further determine that all workers of Staktek Group L.P., currently known as Entorian Technologies L.P., Austin, Texas are denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of March 2008. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E8–7731 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the period of March 24 through March 28, 2008. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss or business by the workers’ firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:21 Apr 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers’ firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–62,911; General Electric—Niles Glass Plant, Niles, OH: February 19, 2007. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–63,027; Coleman Powermate, Springfield, MN: March 18, 2007. TA–W–62,639; Bombardier Transportation, Propulsion Division, Pittsburgh, PA: December 31, 2006. PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 19899 TA–W–62,639A; Bombardier Transportation, Total Transit Systems Division, Pittsburgh, PA: December 31, 2006. TA–W–62,757; Meadowcraft, Inc., Birmingham, AL: January 26, 2007. TA–W–62,768; North Barre Granite, Barre, VT: January 21, 2007. TA–W–62,841; Rock of Ages Corporation, Quarry Division, Graniteville, VT: January 17, 2007. TA–W–62,931; Laser Tek Industries, Inc., Richmond, IL: February 28, 2007. TA–W–62,959; O’Sullivan Films, Inc., Lebanon, PA: March 4, 2007. TA–W–62,973; Griffin Manufacturing Company, Inc., Fall River, MA: March 5, 2007. TA–W–63,000; Chrysler LLC, Manufacturing Truck & Activity Div. Jeff No. Assembly, Detroit, MI: March 12, 2007. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–62,732; Great Circle Ventures Holding, dba Tail Activewear, Miami, FL: January 18, 2007. TA–W–62,924; Techpack America, Inc., Morristown, TN: February 27, 2007. TA–W–62,953; Sensata Technologies, Power Controls Frederick Division, A Subsidiary of Sensata Technologies, Airpax, Frederick, MD: March 3, 2007. TA–W–62,980; Pactiv Corporation, Yakima, WA: March 10, 2007. TA–W–62,912; Sensata Technologies, Power Controls Division, Formerly Known as Airpax Corp., Cambridge, MD: February 14, 2007. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–62,868; Metal Technologies, Inc., West Allis Gray Iron Plant, West Allis, WI: February 18, 2007. TA–W–62,986; Cabot Corporation, Waverly, WV: March 7, 2007. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. None. E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1 19900 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices Negative Determinations For Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 years of age or older. None. The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. TA–W–62,911; General Electric—Niles Glass Plant, Niles, OH. The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers’ industry are not adverse. None. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. TA–W–63,032; Wrights Factory Outlet, A Subsidiary of William Wright Company, Fiskdale, MI. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–62,945; Federal Mogul, Lighting Products Division, Boyertown, IL. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–62,150; Qiagen, Formerly Known as Gentra, Plymouth, PA. TA–W–62,777; Brunswick Bowling & Billiards, Antigo, PA. TA–W–62,832; GAF Materials Corporation, Quakertown, AL. TA–W–62,848; Android Industries Springfield, LLC, Springfield, VT. TA–W–62,964; G–III Apparel Group, Starlo Dresses Division, Computer Patterns Team, New York, MA. The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. TA–W–62,851; Auto Truck Transport, Mount Holly, North Carolina Terminal, Mt. Holly, VT. TA–W–62,958; Auburn Hosiery Mills, Inc., Auburn, PA. The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. None. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of March 24 through March 28, 2008. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: March 4, 2008. Erin Fitzgerald, Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E8–7743 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than April 21, 2008. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than April 21, 2008. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C–5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of April 2008. Erin FitzGerald, Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and APPENDIX [TAA petitions instituted between 3/24/08 and 3/28/08 ] Subject firm (petitioners) Location Mohawk ESV, Inc. (Wkrs) .................................................................... Skynet Satellite Corporation (Rep) ...................................................... GE Zenith Controls (Comp) ................................................................. Eaton Corporation (Comp) ................................................................... Cytec Industries (USW) ....................................................................... Hiawassee, GA ........... Hawley, PA ................. Bonham, TX ................ Oxford, MI ................... Willow Island, WV ....... mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES TA–W 63053 63054 63055 63056 63057 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:21 Apr 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM Date of institution 11APN1 03/24/08 03/24/08 03/24/08 03/24/08 03/24/08 Date of petition 03/12/08 03/21/08 03/12/08 03/18/08 03/20/08

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 71 (Friday, April 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19898-19900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-7743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment 
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of March 24 
through March 28, 2008.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.

    I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
have decreased absolutely; and
    C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with 
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed 
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to 
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
    II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,

[[Page 19899]]

have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become 
totally or partially separated;
    B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or 
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or 
subdivision; and
    C. One of the following must be satisfied:
    1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United 
States;
    2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference 
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin 
Economic Recovery Act; or
    3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of 
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are 
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
    Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for 
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.

    (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' 
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or 
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially 
separated;
    (2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream 
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers 
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade 
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related 
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) 
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the 
workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or 
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the 
workers' separation or threat of separation.

    In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a 
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements 
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.

    1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 
50 years of age or older.
    2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are 
not easily transferable.
    3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., 
conditions within the industry are adverse).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-62,911; General Electric--Niles Glass Plant, Niles, OH: February 
19, 2007.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-63,027; Coleman Powermate, Springfield, MN: March 18, 2007.
TA-W-62,639; Bombardier Transportation, Propulsion Division, 
Pittsburgh, PA: December 31, 2006.
TA-W-62,639A; Bombardier Transportation, Total Transit Systems 
Division, Pittsburgh, PA: December 31, 2006.
TA-W-62,757; Meadowcraft, Inc., Birmingham, AL: January 26, 2007.
TA-W-62,768; North Barre Granite, Barre, VT: January 21, 2007.
TA-W-62,841; Rock of Ages Corporation, Quarry Division, Graniteville, 
VT: January 17, 2007.
TA-W-62,931; Laser Tek Industries, Inc., Richmond, IL: February 28, 
2007.
TA-W-62,959; O'Sullivan Films, Inc., Lebanon, PA: March 4, 2007.
TA-W-62,973; Griffin Manufacturing Company, Inc., Fall River, MA: March 
5, 2007.
TA-W-63,000; Chrysler LLC, Manufacturing Truck & Activity Div. Jeff No. 
Assembly, Detroit, MI: March 12, 2007.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-62,732; Great Circle Ventures Holding, dba Tail Activewear, Miami, 
FL: January 18, 2007.
TA-W-62,924; Techpack America, Inc., Morristown, TN: February 27, 2007.
TA-W-62,953; Sensata Technologies, Power Controls Frederick Division, A 
Subsidiary of Sensata Technologies, Airpax, Frederick, MD: March 3, 
2007.
TA-W-62,980; Pactiv Corporation, Yakima, WA: March 10, 2007.
TA-W-62,912; Sensata Technologies, Power Controls Division, Formerly 
Known as Airpax Corp., Cambridge, MD: February 14, 2007.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 
been met.

TA-W-62,868; Metal Technologies, Inc., West Allis Gray Iron Plant, West 
Allis, WI: February 18, 2007.
TA-W-62,986; Cabot Corporation, Waverly, WV: March 7, 2007.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

None.

[[Page 19900]]

Negative Determinations For Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, it has been determined that the 
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons 
specified.
    The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has 
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 
years of age or older.
None.

    The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily 
transferable.

TA-W-62,911; General Electric--Niles Glass Plant, Niles, OH.

    The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are 
not adverse.

None.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, 
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and 
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.

TA-W-63,032; Wrights Factory Outlet, A Subsidiary of William Wright 
Company, Fiskdale, MI.

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 
production to a foreign country) have not been met.

TA-W-62,945; Federal Mogul, Lighting Products Division, Boyertown, IL.

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign 
country) have not been met.

TA-W-62,150; Qiagen, Formerly Known as Gentra, Plymouth, PA.
TA-W-62,777; Brunswick Bowling & Billiards, Antigo, PA.
TA-W-62,832; GAF Materials Corporation, Quakertown, AL.
TA-W-62,848; Android Industries Springfield, LLC, Springfield, VT.
TA-W-62,964; G-III Apparel Group, Starlo Dresses Division, Computer 
Patterns Team, New York, MA.

    The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for 
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA-W-62,851; Auto Truck Transport, Mount Holly, North Carolina 
Terminal, Mt. Holly, VT.
TA-W-62,958; Auburn Hosiery Mills, Inc., Auburn, PA.

    The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has 
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to 
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified 
eligible to apply for TAA.

None.

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were 
issued during the period of March 24 through March 28, 2008. Copies 
of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, 
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons 
who write to the above address.

     Dated: March 4, 2008.
Erin Fitzgerald,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E8-7743 Filed 4-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.