Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, 18222-18224 [E8-6892]
Download as PDF
18222
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 65 / Thursday, April 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Note: Approved lives in the table are in
flight cycles
(2) Record the mandatory maximum
approved life in the applicable lifing
documentation. It is mandatory to use the
values given in the two tables in step (e)(1)
of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(f) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(g) Refer to EASA Emergency
Airworthiness Directive 2007–0152–E, dated
June 1, 2007, for related information.
(h) Contact Jason Yang, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: jason.yang@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7747; fax (781) 238–7199, for more
information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
March 19, 2008.
Ann C. Mollica,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–6866 Filed 4–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
and AIM, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On March 12, 2008, an NPRM was
published in the Federal Register for
Airspace Docket No. 08–AAL–6, FAA
Docket No. FAA–2008–0111 (73 FR
13159), revoking Area Navigation Jet
Routes J–889R and J–996R in Alaska.
Subsequent to publication, it was found
that the FAA docket number was
incorrect; the correct number is FAA–
2008–0180. In addition, the reference to
one Area Navigation Jet Route was
incorrectly stated in the title of the
NPRM. The correct Jet Route should
have stated J–888R, instead of J–889R.
This action corrects those errors.
Correction to Final Rule
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the FAA
docket number and the title of the
NPRM as published in the Federal
Register on March 12, 2008 (73 FR
13159), Airspace Docket No. 08–AAL–6,
FAA Docket No. FAA–2008–0111, and
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1, is corrected as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
§ 71.1
Federal Aviation Administration
On page 13159, correct the FAA
docket number and the title to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket FAA No. FAA–2008–0180; Airspace
Docket No. 08–AAL–6]
*
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM); correction.
AGENCY:
This action corrects a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
published in the Federal Register March
12, 2008 (73 FR 13159), Airspace Docket
No. 08–AAL–6, FAA Docket No. FAA–
2008–0111. In that rule, the FAA docket
number is incorrect. The correct FAA
docket number should state FAA–2008–
0180, instead of FAA–2008–0111. In
addition, a typographical error to one Jet
Route was made in the title. The title of
the NPRM should reference Jet Route J–
888R, instead of J–889R. This action
corrects those errors.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, April
3, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken
McElroy, Airspace and Rules Group,
Office of System Operations Airspace
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Apr 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
Docket No. FAA–2008–0180
Proposed Revocation of Area Navigation Jet
Routes J–888R and J–996R; Alaska
Proposed Revocation of Area
Navigation Jet Routes J–888R and
J–996R; Alaska
SUMMARY:
[Amended]
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 27,
2008.
Stephen L. Rohring,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. E8–6935 Filed 4–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
the navigable waters of San Diego Bay,
CA in support of the Red Bull Air Race.
The safety zone would be necessary to
provide for the safety of the crew,
spectators, participants in the event,
participating vessels and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels would be prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
April 11, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2008–0162 to the Docket
Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Petty Officer Adam Proctor,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA, at
telephone (619) 278–7277. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
AGENCY:
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to use the Docket Management Facility.
Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’
paragraph below.
ACTION:
Submitting Comments
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0162]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race; San
Diego Bay, San Diego, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary safety zone on
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 65 / Thursday, April 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules
rulemaking (USCG–2008–0162),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that we can contact you if we have
questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and
material by electronic means, mail, fax,
or delivery to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES;
but please submit your comments and
material by only one means. If you
submit them by mail or delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger
than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change this proposed rule in view of
them.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time,
click on ‘‘Search for Dockets,’’ and enter
the docket number for this rulemaking
(USCG–2008–0162) in the Docket ID
box, and click enter. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the DOT West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation’s Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Apr 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard would be
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of San Diego Bay in
support of the Red Bull Air Races. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the crews,
spectators, and participants of the race
and is also necessary to protect other
vessels and users of the waterway.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
a safety zone that would be enforced
from 8 a.m. through 7 p.m. from April
29th, 2008 through May 4th, 2008. This
safety zone is necessary to provide for
the safety of the crews, spectators, and
participants of the Red Bull Air Race
and to protect other vessels and users of
the waterway. Persons and vessels will
be prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative. The limits of this
temporary safety zone include all areas
within a box that extends to the
following coordinates: 32°42′41.00″ N,
117°10′33.06″ W; 32°42′26.40″ N,
117°10′55.69″ W; 32°41′57.22″ N, 117°
9′33.05″ W; and 32°41′45.04″ N, 117°
9′54.28″ W. Coast Guard personnel will
enforce this safety zone. The Coast
Guard may be assisted by other Federal,
State, or local agencies, including the
Coast Guard Auxiliary. Section 165.23
of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations,
prohibits any unauthorized person or
vessel from entering or remaining in a
safety zone. Vessels or persons violating
this section will be subject to both
criminal and civil penalties.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary.
The safety zone is of a limited
duration, only eleven hours per day for
a period of four days, and is limited to
a relatively small geographic area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18223
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
(1) The propsed rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the safety zone
in San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, from
8 a.m. to 7 p.m. on April 29th, 2008
through May 4th, 2008.
(2) This safety zone would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule only
encompasses only a portion of the
waterway, there will be chances for
boating traffic to pass through the safety
zone and the Captain of the Port may
authorize entry into the zone, if
necessary.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Petty Officer
Adam Proctor, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San
Diego at telephone (619) 278–7277. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
18224
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 65 / Thursday, April 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Federalism
Energy Effects
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Apr 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is not likely to have a
significant effect on the human
environment. A preliminary
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Public
Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add new § 165.T11–015 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T11–015 Safety Zone; Red Bull Air
Race, San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA
(a) Location. The limits of this
temporary safety zone would include all
areas within a box that extends to the
following coordinates: 32°42′41.00″ N,
117°10′33.06″ W; 32°42′26.40″ N,
117°10′55.69″ W; 32°41′57.22″ N,
117°9′33.05″ W; and 32°41′45.04″ N,
117°9′54.28″ W.
(b) Effective Period. This section
would be effective from 8 a.m. through
7 p.m. from April 29th, 2008 through
May 5th, 2008. If the need for the safety
zone ends before the scheduled
termination time, the Captain of the Port
will cease enforcement of this safety
zone.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transit through, or
anchoring within this zone by all
vessels would be prohibited, unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative. Mariners
requesting permission to transit through
the safety zone may request
authorization to do so from the Patrol
Commander (PATCOM). The Patrol
Commander may be contacted on VHF–
FM Channel 16.
Enforcement. All persons and vessels
shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or
the designated on-scene patrol
personnel. Patrol personnel can be
comprised of commissioned, warrant,
and petty officers of the Coast Guard
onboard Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels. Upon being hailed
by the U.S. Coast Guard patrol
personnel by siren, radio, flashing light,
or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed. The Coast
Guard may be assisted by other federal,
state, or local agencies.
Dated: March 5, 2008.
D.L. LeBlanc,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port, San Diego.
[FR Doc. E8–6892 Filed 4–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 65 (Thursday, April 3, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18222-18224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6892]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2008-0162]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
on the navigable waters of San Diego Bay, CA in support of the Red Bull
Air Race. The safety zone would be necessary to provide for the safety
of the crew, spectators, participants in the event, participating
vessels and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels would be prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port or his designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before April 11, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2008-0162 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
(1) Online: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground Floor of the West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202-366-9329.
(4) Fax: 202-493-2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Petty Officer Adam Proctor, Waterways Management Division,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA, at telephone (619) 278-7277. If
you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management
Facility. Please see DOT's ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
[[Page 18223]]
rulemaking (USCG-2008-0162), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address,
an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail,
fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one
means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period. We may change this
proposed rule in view of them.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov at
any time, click on ``Search for Dockets,'' and enter the docket number
for this rulemaking (USCG-2008-0162) in the Docket ID box, and click
enter. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-
140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of
Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard would be establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of San Diego Bay in support of the Red Bull Air Races.
This temporary safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of
the crews, spectators, and participants of the race and is also
necessary to protect other vessels and users of the waterway.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone that would be
enforced from 8 a.m. through 7 p.m. from April 29th, 2008 through May
4th, 2008. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of
the crews, spectators, and participants of the Red Bull Air Race and to
protect other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels
will be prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port,
or his designated representative. The limits of this temporary safety
zone include all areas within a box that extends to the following
coordinates: 32[deg]42'41.00'' N, 117[deg]10'33.06'' W;
32[deg]42'26.40'' N, 117[deg]10'55.69'' W; 32[deg]41'57.22'' N,
117[deg] 9'33.05'' W; and 32[deg]41'45.04'' N, 117[deg] 9'54.28'' W.
Coast Guard personnel will enforce this safety zone. The Coast Guard
may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local agencies, including
the Coast Guard Auxiliary. Section 165.23 of Title 33, Code of Federal
Regulations, prohibits any unauthorized person or vessel from entering
or remaining in a safety zone. Vessels or persons violating this
section will be subject to both criminal and civil penalties.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
The safety zone is of a limited duration, only eleven hours per day
for a period of four days, and is limited to a relatively small
geographic area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
(1) The propsed rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the safety zone in San
Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. on April 29th, 2008
through May 4th, 2008.
(2) This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons.
This rule only encompasses only a portion of the waterway, there will
be chances for boating traffic to pass through the safety zone and the
Captain of the Port may authorize entry into the zone, if necessary.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Petty Officer Adam Proctor,
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at
telephone (619) 278-7277. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
[[Page 18224]]
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is not likely to
have a significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public
Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add new Sec. 165.T11-015 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-015 Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, San Diego Bay, San
Diego, CA
(a) Location. The limits of this temporary safety zone would
include all areas within a box that extends to the following
coordinates: 32[deg]42'41.00'' N, 117[deg]10'33.06'' W;
32[deg]42'26.40'' N, 117[deg]10'55.69'' W; 32[deg]41'57.22'' N,
117[deg]9'33.05'' W; and 32[deg]41'45.04'' N, 117[deg]9'54.28'' W.
(b) Effective Period. This section would be effective from 8 a.m.
through 7 p.m. from April 29th, 2008 through May 5th, 2008. If the need
for the safety zone ends before the scheduled termination time, the
Captain of the Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transit through, or anchoring
within this zone by all vessels would be prohibited, unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative. Mariners
requesting permission to transit through the safety zone may request
authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The Patrol
Commander may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
Enforcement. All persons and vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated
on-scene patrol personnel. Patrol personnel can be comprised of
commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the Coast Guard onboard
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels. Upon being hailed by the U.S. Coast Guard patrol
personnel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator
of a vessel shall proceed as directed. The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: March 5, 2008.
D.L. LeBlanc,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, San Diego.
[FR Doc. E8-6892 Filed 4-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P