Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 17365-17367 [E8-6581]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 / Notices
[FR Doc. E8–6429 Filed 3–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–16–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: National Evaluation of the
Addiction Technology Transfer Centers
(ATTC)—NEW
In recognition that systematic
evaluation of this and other government
programs are part of good management
and accountability and will inform
program improvement efforts, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration’s Center for
Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) will
conduct an independent evaluation of
the ATTC Program. The purpose of the
ATTC Program is to develop and
strengthen the workforce that provides
addictions treatment services to 23
million Americans age 12 and older
who need treatment for alcohol or illicit
drug problems. In partnership with
Single State Authorities (SSAs),
treatment provider associations,
addictions counselors, multidisciplinary
professionals, faith and recovery
community leaders, addiction
educators, and other stakeholders, the
ATTCs assess the training and
development needs of the substance use
disorders workforce, and develop and
conduct training and technology
transfer activities to meet these needs.
Particular emphasis is on raising
awareness of and improving skills in
using evidence-based and promising
treatment/recovery practices in
recovery-oriented systems of care.
The goals of the evaluation are to: (1)
Identify the successes of technology
transfer efforts and build upon them in
the future; (2) share lessons learned
across ATTC regions for the
enhancement of all regions’ activities;
and (3) identify region-specific and
cross-regional processes and outcomes.
The evaluation will consist of three
studies. The Planning and Partnering
Study will collect data on the processes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Mar 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
and procedures related to the planning,
partnering, and provision of ATTC
services/activities. The Customer
Satisfaction and Benefit Study will
collect data on the extent to which
ATTC services/activities are satisfactory
and to meet the needs of identified
partners and other program
stakeholders. The Change in Practice
Study will collect data to determine the
extent to which ATTCs have enhanced
the competencies, including cultural
competencies, of specialty addictions
treatment practitioners,
paraprofessionals, and multidisciplinary
professionals to strengthen the
workforce and whether the ATTCs have
provided these individuals with new
skills that have led to changes in
treatment practice.
This will be the first independent,
national evaluation of the ATTC
Program since the program was first
funded by SAMHSA in 1993. The
evaluation approach will be formative
and participatory, and the national
evaluation team will collaborate with
the ATTCs, CSAT, and other program
stakeholders to implement the planned
data collection activities. Surveys,
interviews, and focus groups will be
conducted over a three-year period with
eight (8) main stakeholder groups who
use or are among the target audiences
for the ATTCs’ services or are otherwise
associated with the ATTC program (e.g.,
as ATTC partners): ATTC directors and
staff; customers/recipients of ATTC
services/activities; ATTC Advisory
Board members; partners who
collaborate with ATTCs in planning and
delivering ATTC services/activities;
directors of state substance abuse
agencies; directors of treatment provider
and recovery organizations and
directors of provider associations;
addiction educators; and cultural
leaders involved in addictions
treatment. The data collection
instruments have been constructed to
include information related to each
stakeholder group, as identified above,
and are expected to yield diverse
perspectives related to the processes
and outcomes of the ATTC Program. As
a condition of their grant, each ATTC
was required to budget .25 FTE to
participate in data collection for the
national evaluation.
The evaluation will collect new data
that is necessary for the evaluation and
will also use data and information
collected under existing program
requirements. (Each ATTC is required to
submit GPRA data at the end of each
ATTC training and technical assistance
event and meeting/conference and 30
days after each event; each ATTC will
conduct a workforce survey; and each
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17365
ATTC also submits an annual report.
None of the new data collection
activities will be redundant with these
existing reporting requirements.) CSAT
plans the following new data collection
activities:
(1) Semi-structured interviews with
ATTC directors and other ATTC staff
(e.g., co-directors, ATTC technology
transfer specialists, ATTC evaluator)
that are conducted during site visits to
each ATTC. The purpose of the
interviews will be to collect information
on:
a. Goals and objectives of the ATTC.
b. Regional priorities and needs for
technology transfer services.
c. Processes used to plan ATTC
programs and services.
d. Collaborative relationships with
organizations within and outside the
ATTC region.
e. Organizational structure and
staffing of the ATTC.
f. ATTC funding and leveraging of
resources.
g. Efforts to coordinate services with
other providers of training, technical
assistance, or technology transfer
services within the region.
h. Technology transfer strategies and
services implemented by the ATTC to
promote adoption of culturally
appropriate, evidence-based, and
promising practices.
i. Implementation and use of
workforce surveys.
j. Participation in cross-regional and
network-wide activities.
k. Background characteristics of the
respondent.
(2) Focus groups with ATTC staff
(including field staff who are assigned
to work with specific states and may
work in different locations throughout
the ATTC region), to include
information on:
a. Regional priorities and needs for
technology transfer services.
b. Processes used to plan ATTC
programs and services.
c. Efforts to coordinate services with
other providers of technology transfer
services within the region.
d. Technology transfer strategies and
services implemented by the ATTC to
promote adoption of culturally
appropriate, evidence-based and
promising practices.
e. Background characteristics of focus
group participants.
(3) Telephone interviews with a
sample of stakeholders of the ATTC
program, including state substance
abuse directors (SSAs), ATTC Advisory
Board members, addiction educators,
directors of treatment provider
associations, cultural leaders, and
leaders of recovery associations. The
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
17366
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 / Notices
purpose of the interviews will be to
collect information on:
a. Collaboration with ATTCs for
program planning and service delivery.
b. Awareness of ATTC activities and
services.
c. Utilization of ATTC services.
d. Quality of ATTC services.
e. Changes in awareness, skills,
practices, or systems as a result of ATTC
services.
f. Gaps in ATTC service delivery.
g. Background characteristics of the
respondent.
(4) Survey of ATTC Regional
Advisory Board members to include
questions related to:
a. Composition of the Advisory Board.
b. Stakeholder representation and
representation of the diversity within
the region on the Advisory Board.
c. Role of the ATTC Advisory Board.
d. Frequency of meetings and other
communications (e.g., conference calls).
e. Characteristics of communications
and interactions between the ATTC and
Advisory Board members.
f. Processes to assess regional needs
and priorities.
g. Consideration/utilization of
Advisory Board recommendations by
the ATTC.
h. Satisfaction with ATTC planning
and priority setting processes.
i. Background characteristics of the
respondent.
(5) Survey of ATTC customers
(Customer Satisfaction and Benefit
Survey) to include questions related to:
a. Background characteristics of ATTC
customers/respondents.
b. Participation in different types of
ATTC activities (e.g., training, technical
assistance, meetings/conferences,
product development, etc.).
c. Participation in ATTC activities
focusing on specific topics (e.g.,
evidence-based practices, clinical
supervision, workforce development).
d. Perceived objective of each ATTC
activity (awareness raising, skill
building, change in practice).
e. Satisfaction with and knowledge
gained from ATTC activities.
f. Changes in awareness, skills, or
practices as a result of participation in
ATTC activities .
(6) Evidence-Based Practices Critical
Action Surveys of a sample of
individuals who participated in ATTC
initiatives related to Clinical
Supervision, Motivational Interviewing,
and Treatment Planning MATRS. The
web-based surveys will collect
information on:
a. Prior training related to the
evidence-based practice.
b. Prior experience using the
evidence-based practice.
c. Implementation experience/
changes in practice.
d. Level of proficiency related to the
evidence-based practice.
e. Factors impacting ability to change
practice.
(7) Telephone interviews (Success
Case Interviews) with participants in the
Evidence-Based Critical Action Surveys
who report the greatest and least
amount of success in implementing the
new evidence-based practice. The
interviews will collect information on:
a. Application of what was learned in
clinical or organizational practice.
Number of
respondents
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Name of instrument/respondent
Site Visit Interview Protocol:
ATTC Directors .............................................................
ATTC Staff ....................................................................
Focus Group Protocol:
ATTC Field Staff ...........................................................
Key Informant Interview Protocol:
SSA Directors ...............................................................
ATTC Advisory Board Members ...................................
Provider Association Directors .....................................
Addiction Educators ......................................................
Treatment Agency Directors .........................................
Other Key Advisors .......................................................
Collaborative Functioning Survey:
ATTC Advisory Board Members ...................................
Customer Satisfaction and Benefit Survey:
SSA Directors ...............................................................
Provider Association Directors .....................................
Addiction Educators ......................................................
Treatment Agency Directors .........................................
ATTC Activity Participants ............................................
Other Unique Regional Partners ..................................
Evidence-Based Critical Action Surveys:
ATTC Clinical Supervision Training Participants ..........
ATTC Motivational Interviewing Training Participants ..
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Mar 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Responses
per respondent
b. Illustrative examples of what
occurred as a result of changes in
practice.
c. Characteristics of the training that
made it useful.
d. Barriers to application of what was
learned.
(8) A Clinician Self-Assessment of the
extent to which the clinician has
incorporated the skills associated with
Motivational Interviewing into their
clinical practice, to include information
on:
a. Motivational Interviewing style.
b. Extent to which the clinician has
implemented Motivational Interviewing
skills.
c. Background characteristics of the
respondent.
(9) Survey of directors of addictions
treatment provider organizations
(Survey of Organizational Readiness)
who participated in the Evidence-Based
Critical Action Survey related to the
Treatment Planning MATRS initiative,
to collect information on:
a. Characteristics of the treatment
provider unit or organization.
b. Issues for which the organization
needs external technical assistance or
guidance.
c. Issues for which the staff needs
external technical assistance or
guidance.
d. Source of current pressures for
making organizational change.
e. Background characteristics of the
respondent.
The burden estimate for conducting
the data collection activities for the
national evaluation of the ATTC
Program is as follows:
Total
responses
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
15
38
1
1
15
38
2
1
30
38
35
1
35
2
70
55
45
43
70
42
42
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
45
43
70
42
42
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
45
43
70
42
42
450
2
900
0.5
450
55
43
158
700
3,000
168
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
43
158
700
3,000
168
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
28
22
79
350
1,500
84
240
360
1
1
240
360
0.5
0.5
120
180
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
17367
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 / Notices
Number of
respondents
Name of instrument/respondent
ATTC Treatment Planning MATRS Treatment Participants (Treatment Agency Directors) .........................
Success Case Interview Protocols:
ATTC Clinical Supervision Training Participants ..........
ATTC Motivational Interviewing Training Participants ..
ATTC Treatment Planning MATRS Training Participants (Treatment Directors) ......................................
Clinician Self-Assessment Form on Motivational Interviewing ..............................................................................
Survey of Organizational Readiness:
Treatment Agency Directors .........................................
Total .......................................................................
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by May 1, 2008 to: SAMHSA
Desk Officer, Human Resources and
Housing Branch, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB’s
receipt and processing of mail sent
through the U.S. Postal Service,
respondents are encouraged to submit
comments by fax to: 202–395–6974.
Dated: March 24, 2008.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E8–6581 Filed 3–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Project: The National Cross-Site
Evaluation of Safe Schools/Healthy
Students (SS/HS) Initiative Grants—In
Use Without Approval
The Safe Schools/Healthy Students
(SS/HS) Initiative is a collaborative
grant program supported by three
Federal departments—the U.S.
Departments of Health and Human
Services, Education, and Justice. The
program is authorized under the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Mar 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
Responses
per respondent
Frm 00074
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
240
1
240
0.5
120
48
72
1
1
48
72
1
1
48
72
48
1
48
1
48
72
12
864
0.5
432
240
1
240
0.5
120
6,294
........................
7,521
........................
4,088
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended, and the Higher
Education Act of 1965, Title IV, Part A,
Subpart 2 (National Programs), Section
4121 (Federal Activities), and 42 U.S.C.,
Section 290hh (Children and Violence).
This initiative, instituted by Congress
following the murderous assaults at
Columbine High School in Colorado, is
designed to provide Local Educational
Agencies (LEAs), including school
districts and multidistrict regional
consortia, with funding to
simultaneously improve school safety,
improve student access to mental health
services, reduce violence and substance
use, and strengthen both school
relationships with the larger community
and early childhood preparation for
learning. Collectively, Congress expects
these changes to be reflected in
improved school climate.
Local Education Agencies (LEAs)
serve as the primary applicants for SS/
HS grants, in partnership with the local
mental health system, the local law
enforcement agency, and the local
juvenile justice agency. Other
community partners often involved in
these grants include public and private
social services agencies, businesses,
civic organizations, the faith
community, and private citizens. As a
result of these partnerships,
comprehensive plans are developed,
implemented, evaluated, and sustained
with the goals of promoting the healthy
development of children and youth,
fostering their resilience in the face of
adversity, and preventing violence.
From FY–1999 through FY–2004,
grants of $1 million to $3 million
annually for 3 years were awarded to
190 LEAs, for a total of $916 million. In
FY–2005, 40 new SS/HS grants were
awarded; in FY–2006, an additional 19
grants were awarded; and in FY–2007,
an additional 27 grants will be awarded.
These grants are providing support for
rural, tribal, suburban, and urban
PO 00000
Total
responses
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
communities that include diverse racial
and ethnic groups across the country.
In compliance with the Government
Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of
1993, grantees are required to collect
and report data that measure the results
of the programs implemented with this
grant. Specifically, grantees are required
to collect and report information on the
following GPRA indicators:
1. The percentage of SS/HS grant sites
that experience a decrease in the
number of violent incidents at schools.
2. The percentage of SS/HS grant sites
that experience a decrease in substance
use.
3. The percentage of SS/HS grant sites
that improve school attendance.
4. The percentage of SS/HS grant sites
that increase mental health services to
students and families.
As authorized by 42 U.S.C. 290hh,
item (f), SAMHSA has begun a national
evaluation of the Safe School/Healthy
Students (SS/HS) projects. In addition
to GPRA measures, a Federal Evaluation
Work Group of the national evaluation,
comprising Federal officials
representing the U.S. Departments of
Education, and Health and Human
Services, has determined that
information is also required to address
four overarching questions:
1. Do conditions and resources in the
pre-grant environment facilitate or
impede the implementation of the SS/
HS Initiative at both the local education
agency (LEA) and school levels?
2. Do SS/HS activities lead to the
intended system changes
(comprehensive policies, enhanced
services, and improved coordination)?
3. Do system changes (near-term
outcomes) associated with the SS/HS
Initiative lead to improvements in longterm outcomes (reduction in substance
use and violence, increased access to
mental health services, and
improvement in attendance and school
climate)?
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17365-17367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6581]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: National Evaluation of the Addiction Technology Transfer
Centers (ATTC)--NEW
In recognition that systematic evaluation of this and other
government programs are part of good management and accountability and
will inform program improvement efforts, the Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
(CSAT) will conduct an independent evaluation of the ATTC Program. The
purpose of the ATTC Program is to develop and strengthen the workforce
that provides addictions treatment services to 23 million Americans age
12 and older who need treatment for alcohol or illicit drug problems.
In partnership with Single State Authorities (SSAs), treatment provider
associations, addictions counselors, multidisciplinary professionals,
faith and recovery community leaders, addiction educators, and other
stakeholders, the ATTCs assess the training and development needs of
the substance use disorders workforce, and develop and conduct training
and technology transfer activities to meet these needs. Particular
emphasis is on raising awareness of and improving skills in using
evidence-based and promising treatment/recovery practices in recovery-
oriented systems of care.
The goals of the evaluation are to: (1) Identify the successes of
technology transfer efforts and build upon them in the future; (2)
share lessons learned across ATTC regions for the enhancement of all
regions' activities; and (3) identify region-specific and cross-
regional processes and outcomes. The evaluation will consist of three
studies. The Planning and Partnering Study will collect data on the
processes and procedures related to the planning, partnering, and
provision of ATTC services/activities. The Customer Satisfaction and
Benefit Study will collect data on the extent to which ATTC services/
activities are satisfactory and to meet the needs of identified
partners and other program stakeholders. The Change in Practice Study
will collect data to determine the extent to which ATTCs have enhanced
the competencies, including cultural competencies, of specialty
addictions treatment practitioners, paraprofessionals, and
multidisciplinary professionals to strengthen the workforce and whether
the ATTCs have provided these individuals with new skills that have led
to changes in treatment practice.
This will be the first independent, national evaluation of the ATTC
Program since the program was first funded by SAMHSA in 1993. The
evaluation approach will be formative and participatory, and the
national evaluation team will collaborate with the ATTCs, CSAT, and
other program stakeholders to implement the planned data collection
activities. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups will be conducted
over a three-year period with eight (8) main stakeholder groups who use
or are among the target audiences for the ATTCs' services or are
otherwise associated with the ATTC program (e.g., as ATTC partners):
ATTC directors and staff; customers/recipients of ATTC services/
activities; ATTC Advisory Board members; partners who collaborate with
ATTCs in planning and delivering ATTC services/activities; directors of
state substance abuse agencies; directors of treatment provider and
recovery organizations and directors of provider associations;
addiction educators; and cultural leaders involved in addictions
treatment. The data collection instruments have been constructed to
include information related to each stakeholder group, as identified
above, and are expected to yield diverse perspectives related to the
processes and outcomes of the ATTC Program. As a condition of their
grant, each ATTC was required to budget .25 FTE to participate in data
collection for the national evaluation.
The evaluation will collect new data that is necessary for the
evaluation and will also use data and information collected under
existing program requirements. (Each ATTC is required to submit GPRA
data at the end of each ATTC training and technical assistance event
and meeting/conference and 30 days after each event; each ATTC will
conduct a workforce survey; and each ATTC also submits an annual
report. None of the new data collection activities will be redundant
with these existing reporting requirements.) CSAT plans the following
new data collection activities:
(1) Semi-structured interviews with ATTC directors and other ATTC
staff (e.g., co-directors, ATTC technology transfer specialists, ATTC
evaluator) that are conducted during site visits to each ATTC. The
purpose of the interviews will be to collect information on:
a. Goals and objectives of the ATTC.
b. Regional priorities and needs for technology transfer services.
c. Processes used to plan ATTC programs and services.
d. Collaborative relationships with organizations within and
outside the ATTC region.
e. Organizational structure and staffing of the ATTC.
f. ATTC funding and leveraging of resources.
g. Efforts to coordinate services with other providers of training,
technical assistance, or technology transfer services within the
region.
h. Technology transfer strategies and services implemented by the
ATTC to promote adoption of culturally appropriate, evidence-based, and
promising practices.
i. Implementation and use of workforce surveys.
j. Participation in cross-regional and network-wide activities.
k. Background characteristics of the respondent.
(2) Focus groups with ATTC staff (including field staff who are
assigned to work with specific states and may work in different
locations throughout the ATTC region), to include information on:
a. Regional priorities and needs for technology transfer services.
b. Processes used to plan ATTC programs and services.
c. Efforts to coordinate services with other providers of
technology transfer services within the region.
d. Technology transfer strategies and services implemented by the
ATTC to promote adoption of culturally appropriate, evidence-based and
promising practices.
e. Background characteristics of focus group participants.
(3) Telephone interviews with a sample of stakeholders of the ATTC
program, including state substance abuse directors (SSAs), ATTC
Advisory Board members, addiction educators, directors of treatment
provider associations, cultural leaders, and leaders of recovery
associations. The
[[Page 17366]]
purpose of the interviews will be to collect information on:
a. Collaboration with ATTCs for program planning and service
delivery.
b. Awareness of ATTC activities and services.
c. Utilization of ATTC services.
d. Quality of ATTC services.
e. Changes in awareness, skills, practices, or systems as a result
of ATTC services.
f. Gaps in ATTC service delivery.
g. Background characteristics of the respondent.
(4) Survey of ATTC Regional Advisory Board members to include
questions related to:
a. Composition of the Advisory Board.
b. Stakeholder representation and representation of the diversity
within the region on the Advisory Board.
c. Role of the ATTC Advisory Board.
d. Frequency of meetings and other communications (e.g., conference
calls).
e. Characteristics of communications and interactions between the
ATTC and Advisory Board members.
f. Processes to assess regional needs and priorities.
g. Consideration/utilization of Advisory Board recommendations by
the ATTC.
h. Satisfaction with ATTC planning and priority setting processes.
i. Background characteristics of the respondent.
(5) Survey of ATTC customers (Customer Satisfaction and Benefit
Survey) to include questions related to:
a. Background characteristics of ATTC customers/respondents.
b. Participation in different types of ATTC activities (e.g.,
training, technical assistance, meetings/conferences, product
development, etc.).
c. Participation in ATTC activities focusing on specific topics
(e.g., evidence-based practices, clinical supervision, workforce
development).
d. Perceived objective of each ATTC activity (awareness raising,
skill building, change in practice).
e. Satisfaction with and knowledge gained from ATTC activities.
f. Changes in awareness, skills, or practices as a result of
participation in ATTC activities .
(6) Evidence-Based Practices Critical Action Surveys of a sample of
individuals who participated in ATTC initiatives related to Clinical
Supervision, Motivational Interviewing, and Treatment Planning MATRS.
The web-based surveys will collect information on:
a. Prior training related to the evidence-based practice.
b. Prior experience using the evidence-based practice.
c. Implementation experience/changes in practice.
d. Level of proficiency related to the evidence-based practice.
e. Factors impacting ability to change practice.
(7) Telephone interviews (Success Case Interviews) with
participants in the Evidence-Based Critical Action Surveys who report
the greatest and least amount of success in implementing the new
evidence-based practice. The interviews will collect information on:
a. Application of what was learned in clinical or organizational
practice.
b. Illustrative examples of what occurred as a result of changes in
practice.
c. Characteristics of the training that made it useful.
d. Barriers to application of what was learned.
(8) A Clinician Self-Assessment of the extent to which the
clinician has incorporated the skills associated with Motivational
Interviewing into their clinical practice, to include information on:
a. Motivational Interviewing style.
b. Extent to which the clinician has implemented Motivational
Interviewing skills.
c. Background characteristics of the respondent.
(9) Survey of directors of addictions treatment provider
organizations (Survey of Organizational Readiness) who participated in
the Evidence-Based Critical Action Survey related to the Treatment
Planning MATRS initiative, to collect information on:
a. Characteristics of the treatment provider unit or organization.
b. Issues for which the organization needs external technical
assistance or guidance.
c. Issues for which the staff needs external technical assistance
or guidance.
d. Source of current pressures for making organizational change.
e. Background characteristics of the respondent.
The burden estimate for conducting the data collection activities
for the national evaluation of the ATTC Program is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses per Total Hours per Total burden
Name of instrument/respondent respondents respondent responses response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site Visit Interview Protocol:
ATTC Directors.............. 15 1 15 2 30
ATTC Staff.................. 38 1 38 1 38
Focus Group Protocol:
ATTC Field Staff............ 35 1 35 2 70
Key Informant Interview
Protocol:
SSA Directors............... 55 1 55 1 55
ATTC Advisory Board Members. 45 1 45 1 45
Provider Association 43 1 43 1 43
Directors..................
Addiction Educators......... 70 1 70 1 70
Treatment Agency Directors.. 42 1 42 1 42
Other Key Advisors.......... 42 1 42 1 42
Collaborative Functioning
Survey:
ATTC Advisory Board Members. 450 2 900 0.5 450
Customer Satisfaction and
Benefit Survey:
SSA Directors............... 55 1 55 0.5 28
Provider Association 43 1 43 0.5 22
Directors..................
Addiction Educators......... 158 1 158 0.5 79
Treatment Agency Directors.. 700 1 700 0.5 350
ATTC Activity Participants.. 3,000 1 3,000 0.5 1,500
Other Unique Regional 168 1 168 0.5 84
Partners...................
Evidence-Based Critical Action
Surveys:
ATTC Clinical Supervision 240 1 240 0.5 120
Training Participants......
ATTC Motivational 360 1 360 0.5 180
Interviewing Training
Participants...............
[[Page 17367]]
ATTC Treatment Planning 240 1 240 0.5 120
MATRS Treatment
Participants (Treatment
Agency Directors)..........
Success Case Interview
Protocols:
ATTC Clinical Supervision 48 1 48 1 48
Training Participants......
ATTC Motivational 72 1 72 1 72
Interviewing Training
Participants...............
ATTC Treatment Planning 48 1 48 1 48
MATRS Training Participants
(Treatment Directors)......
Clinician Self-Assessment Form 72 12 864 0.5 432
on Motivational Interviewing...
Survey of Organizational
Readiness:
Treatment Agency Directors.. 240 1 240 0.5 120
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................... 6,294 .............. 7,521 .............. 4,088
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by May 1, 2008 to: SAMHSA Desk
Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202-395-6974.
Dated: March 24, 2008.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E8-6581 Filed 3-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P