Highway Safety Programs; Model Specifications for Screening; Devices to Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids, 16956-16960 [E8-6520]
Download as PDF
16956
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
require interpretation by a test
administrator or technician. Because the
agency has determined the BASS device
is not necessary for inclusion in the
Model Specifications, this notice
removes all references to the BASS
device.
Additionally, in order to ensure
product integrity, this notice provides
guidelines for retesting devices when
manufacturers contemplate changes,
revisions, or upgrades to alcohol
screening devices on the Conforming
Products List (CPL).
These revisions to the Model
Specifications will not affect devices
currently listed on the CPL.
DATES: Effective Date: Revisions to these
Model Specifications become effective
on March 31, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical issues: Ms. De Carlo Ciccel,
Behavioral Research Division, NTI–131,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
Telephone: (202) 366–1694. For legal
issues: Mr. David Bonelli, Office of
Chief Counsel, NCC–113, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590; Telephone:
(202) 366–5834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[NHTSA Docket No. 2008–0030]
I. Background
Highway Safety Programs; Model
Specifications for Screening; Devices
to Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids
As indicated in the Model
Specifications published in 1994, the
agency will modify and improve the
Model Specifications as new data and
test procedures become available and
will alter the test procedures, as
necessary, to meet unique design
features of specific devices. Since
publication of the Model Specifications,
the agency encountered difficulties
ensuring the accuracy of testing ISDs
and also determined the use of the
BASS is not necessary for inclusion in
the Model Specifications. These events
made it necessary to revise the Model
Specifications.
On December 14, 2007, (72 FR 71188),
NHTSA proposed and sought comments
on amendments and revisions to the
Model Specifications published in 1994.
In the notice, NHTSA explained that the
1994 Model Specifications allowed for
evaluation of screening devices that
require subjective interpretation of test
results by a test administrator or
technician. These ISDs differ from
devices that provide objective test
results, including the use of digital
technology or the appearance of lights
or marks based on the presence or
absence of alcohol. For instance, use of
pass/fail lights or enzymes that react
IGNATYUK #8127804 and JIM
KILABUK #7420754) would operate in
the Beaufort Sea or Chukchi Sea
adjacent to Alaska, under certain
conditions, and for a limited period of
time. Section 705 of Pub.L. 109–347
allows the use of foreign-flag vessels in
this regard if the Maritime
Administration determines that U.S.flag vessels are not suitable or
reasonably available.
The Maritime Administration is
posting this notice in the Federal
Register providing the public 30 days
notice of our intention to provide a
determination allowing for the use of
foreign-flag vessels in this regard, if
suitable and available U.S.-flag vessels
are not otherwise identified. The
Maritime Administration’s
determination will be for the period
through December 31, 2009.
By order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: March 25, 2008.
Christine Gurland,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–6567 Filed 3–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice revises Model
Specifications for Screening Devices to
Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids
(Model Specifications) published in the
Federal Register on August 2, 1994 (59
FR 39382). These devices test for the
presence of alcohol using breath or
bodily fluids such as saliva. The Model
Specifications support State laws that
target youthful offenders (i.e., ‘‘zero
tolerance’’ laws) and the Department of
Transportation’s regulations on Alcohol
Misuse Prevention, and encourage
industry efforts to develop new
technologies (e.g., non-breath devices)
that measure alcohol content from
bodily fluids.
This notice removed testing of
Interpretive Screening Devices (ISDs)
and use of the Breath Alcohol Sample
Simulator (BASS) device from the
Model Specifications. The ISDs did not
provide an unambiguous test result, as
test results for ISDs are subjective and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with alcohol to produce an
unambiguous mark provide objective
test results. Also, the 1994 Model
Specifications required that interpretive
devices be evaluated subjectively under
five lighting conditions (fluorescent,
incandescent, mercury, sodium and
daylight) by a panel of ten novice
evaluators who are not color blind.
Since publication of the 1994 Model
Specifications, NHTSA evaluated eight
separate ISDs. Of those eight ISD
evaluations, none resulted in a
successful outcome in the panel test
described above. In one evaluation, the
device passed the test under all lighting
conditions except sodium. This device
is no longer manufactured. Although
many novice evaluators were able to
judge the correct test outcome in the
eight ISD evaluations, some could not,
even though the manufacturers’
instructions were conveyed to the
evaluators and all evaluators passed
tests to determine their color perception
ability. This subjective interpretation of
test results does not ensure accuracy
and precision required to protect public
safety. Due to repeated problems in
evaluating ISDs, NHTSA proposed to
remove altogether testing of ISDs and all
references to interpretive or color
indicator tests from the Model
Specifications.
The 1994 Model Specifications
provided for the use of the Breath
Alcohol Sample Simulator (BASS)
device for delivering alcohol-in-air test
samples. The use of the BASS device is
not necessary for inclusion in the Model
Specifications because the BASS device
is intended for use in testing the
sampling efficiency of evidential breath
testers. There is no sampling efficiency
test in the Model Specifications for
alcohol screening devices. The alcoholin-air test sample for breath alcohol
screening devices is supplied by a
calibrating unit. Therefore, the agency
proposed to remove all references to the
BASS device from the Model
Specifications.
The 1994 Model Specifications also
provide procedures to conduct special
investigations and re-test a device if
information gathered indicates that a
device listed on the CPL is not
performing in accordance with the
Model Specifications. The agency
proposed the addition of Appendix B to
provide guidance regarding notification
and re-testing when manufacturers
contemplate revisions to devices listed
on the CPL. The proposed Appendix
follows the language used in the Model
Specifications for evidential breath
testing devices (58 FR 48705). Upon
notification by a manufacturer of a
contemplated change to a device listed
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
on the CPL, NHTSA proposed that it
would determine whether re-testing is
required. Such determination would
look at several factors, including the
nature and reason for the change, the
scope of the change, the effects of the
change on the performance of the
device, and how the change will be
documented for the benefit of the user.
NHTSA would list device revisions and
whether re-testing was required in the
next update to the CPL. Appendix B
also would state that NHTSA may retest any device listed on the CPL at any
time to determine continued
compliance and performance with the
Model Specifications. A device found
not to perform in accordance with the
Model Specifications would be subject
to the special investigation procedures
discussed below.
Having received no comments on any
aspect of the agency’s proposal, this
notice adopts the proposed revisions,
including the ‘‘Procedures’’ and ‘‘Model
Specifications for Alcohol Screening
Devices,’’ without change.
II. Procedures
This section describes the current
procedures. The DOT Volpe National
Transportation Systems Center
(VNTSC), RTV–4F, Kendall Square,
Cambridge, MA 02142 tests products
manufacturers submit to determine
whether the products meet the model
specifications. Tests are conducted
semiannually, or as necessary.
Manufacturers are required to apply to
NHTSA for a test date by writing to the
Office of Behavioral Safety Research,
NTI–130, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. At
least 30 days are typically required from
the date of notification until the test can
be scheduled.
One week prior to the scheduled
initiation of the test program,
manufacturers must deliver their
devices to VNTSC. If the devices are
disposable, the manufacturer must
deliver at least 300 such devices; if the
devices are reusable, the manufacturer
need submit only a single device. If a
manufacturer of a reusable device
wishes to submit a duplicate, backup
instrument, it may so do. The
manufacturer is responsible for ensuring
that the devices operate properly and
are packaged correctly. The
manufacturer must also deliver the
operator’s manual (or instructions) and
the maintenance manual (if any) that is
to be supplied with the purchase of the
device, as well as specifications and
drawings fully describing the device
and its use. Information determined to
be proprietary will be respected. (See 49
CFR Part 512, regarding the procedure
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
by which NHTSA will consider claims
of confidentiality.)
In addition, the manufacturer must
submit a self-certification, certifying
that the manufacturer meets the
requirements according to the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) Good
Manufacturing Practices regulations for
devices used for medical purposes (21
CFR Part 820), and that the device’s
label meets the requirements in FDA’s
Labeling regulations for devices used for
medical purposes (21 CFR Part 809.10),
even if the devices are not to be used for
medical purposes. See Appendix A to
this notice.
The manufacturer has the right to
check its device(s) between the time of
arrival at VNTSC and the start of the
tests, but will have no access to the
device(s) during the tests. Any
malfunction of a device resulting in
failure to complete any of the tests
satisfactorily will result in a
determination that the device does not
conform to the Model Specifications. If
a device is found not to conform to the
Model Specifications, it may be
resubmitted for the next testing cycle
after appropriate corrections have been
made. However, the agency reserves the
discretion to determine whether to
conduct any retest.
The agency intends to update and
republish the CPL in the Federal
Register annually. Republications of the
CPL add conforming alcohol screening
devices tested since the last CPL
republication.
NHTSA will continue to provide
notification in the Federal Register
when the agency amends the Model
Specifications as new data and test
procedures become available and will
retest devices when necessary.
The NHTSA Office of Behavioral
Safety Research is the point of contact
for information about acceptance testing
and field performance of devices that
are in the marketplace. NHTSA requests
that users of alcohol screening devices
provide both acceptance and field
performance data to the Office of
Behavioral Safety Research when such
data indicate potential performance
problems. Information from users will
help NHTSA monitor whether alcohol
screening devices are performing
according to the NHTSA Model
Specifications.
If information gathered indicates that
a device on the CPL is not performing
in accordance with the Model
Specifications, NHTSA may direct
VNTSC to conduct a special
investigation. An investigation may
include visits to users and additional
tests of devices obtained on the open
market. If the investigation indicates
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16957
that a device actually sold on the market
does not meet the Model Specifications,
the manufacturer will be notified that
the device may be removed from the
CPL. In this event, the manufacturer
will have 30 days from the date of
notification to reply. Based on the
VNTSC investigation and any data
provided by the manufacturer, NHTSA
will decide whether the device should
remain on the CPL. If the device is
removed from the CPL, the
manufacturer will be permitted to
resubmit an improved device to VNTSC
for testing when it believes the problems
causing its failure have been resolved.
Upon resubmission, the manufacturer
must submit a statement describing
what has been done to overcome the
problems that led to failure of the
device. The agency reserves the
discretion to determine whether to
conduct any retest.
If information gathered indicates that
the manufacturer of a device on the CPL
does not comply with the requirements
in FDA’s Good Manufacturing Practices
regulations for devices used for medical
purposes or that the device’s label does
not comply with the requirements in
FDA’s labeling regulations for devices
used for medical purposes, NHTSA may
investigate the matter in consultation
with FDA and will notify the
manufacturer that the device may be
removed from the CPL. The
manufacturer will have 30 days from the
date of notification to reply. Based on
any data provided by the manufacturer
and investigative findings, NHTSA will
decide whether the device should
remain on the CPL. If the device is
removed from the CPL, the
manufacturer will be permitted to
resubmit a self-certification, certifying
that the manufacturer or its device
complies with these FDA requirements
when it believes the problems causing
its non-compliance have been resolved.
Upon resubmission, the manufacturer
must submit a statement describing
what has been done to overcome the
problems that led to non-compliance.
In accordance with the foregoing, the
amendments of the Model
Specifications for Screening Devices to
Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids, are
set forth below.
Model Specifications for Alcohol
Screening Devices
1. Purpose and Scope
These specifications establish
performance criteria and methods for
testing of alcohol screening devices.
Alcohol screening devices use bodily
fluids to detect the presence of 0.020 or
more BAC (see below) with sufficient
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
16958
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
accuracy for screening purposes. These
specifications are intended primarily for
use in the conformance testing of
alcohol screening devices.
2. Classification
2.1 Disposable Alcohol Screening
Devices.
Alcohol screening devices designed
for a single use.
2.2 Reusable Alcohol Screening
Devices.
Alcohol screening devices designed to
be reused.
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
3. Definitions
3.1 Alcohol.
The intoxicating agent in beverage
alcohol, ethyl alcohol or other low
molecular weight alcohols including
methyl or isopropyl alcohol.
3.2 Alcohol Screening Device.
A device that is used to detect the
presence of 0.020 or more BAC. The
device may measure any bodily fluid for
this purpose, but shall provide output in
BAC units. Test results must be
indicated unambiguously by numerical
read-out or by other means, such as by
the use of lights or by the appearance of
a distinctive mark but not by color
change.
3.3 Blood alcohol concentration
(BAC).
Grams alcohol per 100 milliliters of
blood or grams alcohol per 210 liters of
breath in accordance with the Uniform
Vehicle Code, Section 11–903(a)(5) 1
(BrAC is often used to indicate that the
measurement is a breath measurement);
or grams alcohol per 100 milliliters of
saliva.
3.4 Calibrating Unit.
A device that produces an alcohol-inair test sample of known concentration
and that meets the NHTSA Model
Specifications for Calibrating Units (72
FR 34742).
3.5 Bodily Fluid.
Any bodily fluid capable of being
used to estimate alcohol concentration,
provided the relationship between such
bodily fluid and BAC has been
established according to scientifically
acceptable standards. Such fluids
include but are not limited to blood,
exhaled deep lung breath and saliva.
3.6 Scientifically Acceptable
Substitutes.
Fluids that have been scientifically
accepted as equivalent to bodily fluids
for testing purposes, such as aqueous
alcohol test solutions on a one-to-one
basis for blood or saliva.
1 Available from the National Committee on
Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances, 107 S. West
Street, # 10, Alexandria, VA 22314. Web site
address: https://www.ncutle.org
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
4. Test Methods and Requirements
Testing will be performed according
to the instructions that normally
accompany the submitted device and
under the conditions specified in the
tests below.
4.1 Test 1. Precision and Accuracy.
Perform 40 trials under normal
laboratory conditions including 20 trials
at 0.008 BAC and 20 trials at 0.032 BAC.
Use a calibrating unit for this test for
breath devices and preparations of
bodily fluids or scientifically acceptable
substitutes for non-breath devices.
Perform tests using a VNTSC
investigator.
To conform at 0.008 BAC, not more
than one positive result. To conform at
0.032 BAC, not more than one nonpositive result.
4.2 Test 2. Blank Reading.
Perform 20 trials under normal
laboratory conditions at 0.000 BAC. Use
non-alcoholic human breath for breath
devices and non-alcoholic bodily fluids
or scientifically acceptable substitutes
for non-breath devices. Perform tests
using a VNTSC investigator.
To conform: no positive results. If the
device is capable of providing a reading
of greater than 0.000 BAC and less than
0.020 BAC, not more than one such
result.
4.3 Test 3. Cigarette smoke
interference (only breath and saliva test
devices).
Perform five trials at 0.000 BAC.
Select an alcohol-free person who
smokes cigarettes for this test. Ask the
person selected to smoke approximately
one half of a cigarette. Within one
minute after smoking, or after a waiting
period specified in the manufacturer’s
instructions, administer the alcohol
screening device test according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Then ask
the person to take another smoke and
repeat the test to produce a total of five
trials.
To conform: no positive results.
4.4 Temperature.
Test at low and high ambient
temperature.
4.4.1 Test 4.1. Low Ambient
Temperature.
Perform 40 trials at 10 degrees
Centigrade (C), including 20 trials at
0.008 BAC and 20 trials at 0.032 BAC.
Use a calibrating unit for this test for
breath devices and preparations of
bodily fluids or scientifically acceptable
substitutes for non-breath devices.
To conform at 0.008 BAC, not more
than one positive result. To conform at
0.032 BAC, not more than one nonpositive result.
4.4.2 Test 4.2 High Ambient
Temperature.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Perform trials of 40 devices at 40
degrees C, including 20 trials at 0.008
BAC and 20 trials at 0.032 BAC. Use a
calibrating unit for this test for breath
devices and preparations of bodily
fluids or scientifically acceptable
substitutes for non-breath devices.
To conform at 0.008 BAC, not more
than one positive result. To conform at
0.032 BAC, not more than one nonpositive result.
4.5. Test 5. Vibration.
Perform 40 trials, including 20 trials
at 0.008 BAC and 20 trials at 0.032 BAC.
Use a calibrating unit for this test for
breath devices and preparations of
bodily fluids or scientifically acceptable
substitutes for non-breath devices.
Mount the screening device on a
shake table and vibrate the table in
simple harmonic motion through each
of its three major axes, as specified
below. Sweep through each frequency
range in 2.5 minutes, then reverse the
sweep to the starting frequency in 2.5
minutes. Disposable testers may be
placed in a suitable box mounted on the
shake table. Test after vibration.
Frequency (hertz)
Amplitude
(inches,
peak to
peak)
10 to 30 ....................................
30 to 60 ....................................
0.30
0.15
To conform at 0.008 BAC, not more
than one positive result. To conform at
0.032 BAC not more than one nonpositive result.
Appendix A—Labeling Instructions
for Alcohol Screening Devices’ Intended
Use Provide the intended use including
the specimen matrix (e.g. saliva, breath),
the assay type (quantitative, semiquantitative), the purpose of performing
the assay, and the individual designated
to perform the assay.
e.g.: This product is intended for the
(quantitative, semi-quantitative)
determination of alcohol in —define
matrix (for e.g., saliva, breath, sweat) to
perform screening alcohol assays.
This product is recommended for use
by individuals who have been trained in
the administration of screening devices.
Description of Testing System
Provide the principles of the
procedure for performing the alcohol
screening assay.
e.g.: This product uses (alcohol
dehydrogenase, infrared technology,
etc.) to perform the test.
Chemical Reaction Sequence
Describe the chemical reaction
sequence, if applicable.
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
Reagents: List the concentration,
strength, and composition of the
reactive ingredients.
List the non-reactive ingredients.
Reagent Preparation and Storage
Provide instructions for preparing the
reagents, if applicable.
Provide instructions for storing the
reagents, if applicable.
Provide any signs of deterioration of
the reagents, if applicable.
Provide the reagents’ shelf life and
opened expiration dating, if applicable.
e.g.: Tests in unopened packaging are
stable until the date printed on the
product container when stored at 22–28
degrees C. If packaging is opened, tests
must be conducted at once.
Provide a caution not to use the
reagents beyond the expiration date.
Provide the description of the
required frequency of equipment
maintenance and function checks.
Provide the instructions for any
remedial action to be taken when the
equipment performs outside of its
operating range.
Provide any operational precautions
and limitations.
Provide instructions for the protection
of equipment and instrumentation from
fluctuations or interruptions in
electrical current that could adversely
affect test results and reports, if
applicable.
Disposable Tests
If applicable, the function and
stability of the test can be determined by
the examination of the procedural ‘‘built
in’’ controls contained in the product. If
these controls are not working, the test
is invalid and must be repeated.
Disposable/Instrumented Devices
Calibration
Results
Disposable tests are pre-calibrated. No
additional calibration is required.
Reusable (Instrumented) tests require
calibration.
Provide information regarding how
calibrations are to be conducted, if
applicable, including the number and
concentration of calibrators, and the
frequency of calibration.
Provide instructions for calibration
and recalibration.
Provide the criteria for acceptability
of calibration.
Describe how the user obtains the test
results, e.g., from an instrument readout, printout, etc.
Describe the results in terms of blood
alcohol concentration.
Describe what concentration indicates
a positive result and what concentration
indicates a negative result.
Test Procedure (Disposable)
Dynamic Range
Provide adequate step-by-step
instructions for performing the test and
determining the results.
Provide the operating range of the
product.
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Jkt 214001
Technical Assistance
List an 800 number the user may
contact for further information or
technical assistance.
Appendix B—Guidelines for Re-testing
of Modified Screening Devices
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 403; 49 CFR 1.50; 49
CFR Part 501.
Quality Control (QC)
Provide instructions for collecting and
handling the sample.
Provide criteria for specimen
rejection, if applicable.
Specimen Collection
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Provide pertinent bibliography.
Manufacturers contemplating
revisions to an alcohol screening device
listed on the Conforming Products List
(CPL) are advised that the revision may
affect the status of the device on the
CPL. The manufacturer should inform
NHTSA of the contemplated change so
that a judgment can be made whether or
not re-testing the revised alcohol
screening device is necessary. The
following lists the type of information
NHTSA uses in determining the
necessity to re-test an alcohol screening
device, and is provided as guidance to
manufacturers:
• Manufacturer and Model Name.
• Nature and reason for change(s).
• Scope of change(s) (e.g., Will
existing devices be retrofitted? Will the
change apply to some users but not
others?)
• Will the change(s) affect
performance of the device with regard to
the Model Specifications? (Precision
and accuracy, blank reading,
temperature operations, or vibrations.)
• How will the change(s) be
documented for the benefit of the user?
(e.g., Will the change(s) be documented
in service bulletins and/or service
manuals? If not, why not?)
If necessary for clarity, drawings of
the listed and changed device may also
be helpful in NHTSA’s deliberations.
If, upon review of information
provided by a manufacturer, it is
determined that re-testing is not
warranted, a statement to that effect will
be included in the next scheduled CPL
update.
NHTSA reserves the right to test any
CPL-listed device on the open market to
determine continued compliance and
performance in accordance with these
Model Specifications. Devices found not
to comply with or perform in
accordance with the Model
Specifications are subject to the
investigation provisions stated above in
section II, Procedures.
If external quality control materials
are used, provide the number, type,
matrix and concentration of the QC
materials.
Provide directions for performing
quality control procedures.
Provide an adequate description of
the remedial action to be taken when
the QC results fail to meet the criteria
for acceptability.
Provide directions for interpretation
of the results of quality control samples.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
References
List the substances that have been
evaluated with your product that do or
1. List any reagents that may be
hazardous such as caustic compounds,
sodium azide or other hazardous
reagents and instructions for disposal, if
applicable.
2. Provide warning to user to treat all
samples as potentially infective. Include
instructions for handling and disposal
of the sample.
Provide adequate step-by-step
instruction for performing the test.
Provide the installation procedures
and, if applicable, any special
requirements.
Provide the space and ventilation
requirements.
do not interfere at the concentration
indicated.
Specificity
Precautions
Test Procedure (Re-usable/
Instrumented)
16959
Limitations
List the substances or factors that may
interfere with the test and cause false
results including technical or
procedural errors.
Precision and Accuracy
Only devices that meet the precision
and accuracy of these Model
Specifications will be included on
NHTSA’s Conforming Products List for
alcohol screening devices.
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
16960
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
Issued on: March 25, 2008.
Marilena Amoni,
Associate Administrator for the Office of
Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–6520 Filed 3–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0051]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming 2000
Chevrolet Tahoe Multipurpose
Passenger Vehicles Are Eligible for
Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for
decision that nonconforming 2000
Chevrolet Tahoe multipurpose
passenger vehicles are eligible for
importation.
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that 2000
Chevrolet Tahoe multipurpose
passenger vehicles that were not
originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable Federal motor vehicle
safety standards (FMVSS) are eligible
for importation into the United States
because (1) they are substantially
similar to vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards, and (2) they are
capable of being readily altered to
conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is April 30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
no greater than 15 pages in length,
although there is no limit to the length
of necessary attachments to the
comments. If comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please ensure that
two copies are provided. If you wish to
receive confirmation that your
comments were received, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard with
the comments. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
How to Read Comments Submitted to
the Docket: You may read the comments
received by Docket Management at the
address and times given above. You may
also view the documents from the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number and title of this notice are
shown at the heading of this document
notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically search the Docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for sale in the United States, certified
under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same
model year as the model of the motor
vehicle to be compared, and is capable
of being readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
Barry Taylor Enterprises of
Richmond, California (BTE)(Registered
Importer 01–280) has petitioned NHTSA
to decide whether nonconforming 2000
Chevrolet Tahoe multipurpose
passenger vehicles are eligible for
importation into the United States. The
vehicles which BTE believes are
substantially similar are 2000 Chevrolet
Tahoe multipurpose passenger vehicles
that were manufactured for sale in the
United States and certified by their
manufacturer as conforming to all
applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it carefully
compared non-U.S. certified 2000
Chevrolet Tahoe multipurpose
passenger vehicles to their U.S.-certified
counterparts, and found the vehicles to
be substantially similar with respect to
compliance with most FMVSS.
BTE submitted information with its
petition intended to demonstrate that
non-U.S. certified 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe
multipurpose passenger vehicles, as
originally manufactured, conform to
many FMVSS in the same manner as
their U.S. certified counterparts, or are
capable of being readily altered to
conform to those standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that
non-U.S. certified 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe
multipurpose passenger vehicles are
identical to their U.S.-certified
counterparts with respect to compliance
with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission
Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock,
and Transmission Braking Effect, 103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging
Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 111
Rearview Mirrors, 113 Hood Latch
System, 114 Theft Protection, 116 Motor
Vehicle Brake Fluids, 118 PowerOperated Window, Partition, and Roof
Panel Systems, 119 New Pneumatic
Tires for Vehicles Other than Passenger
Cars, 120 Tire Selection and Rims for
Motor Vehicles Other than Passenger
Cars, 124 Accelerator Control Systems,
135 Passenger Car Brake Systems, 201
Occupant Protection in Interior Impact,
202 Head Restraints, 204 Steering
Control Rearward Displacement, 205
Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and
Door Retention Components, 207
Seating Systems, 208 Occupant Crash
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 62 (Monday, March 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16956-16960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6520]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[NHTSA Docket No. 2008-0030]
Highway Safety Programs; Model Specifications for Screening;
Devices to Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice revises Model Specifications for Screening Devices
to Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids (Model Specifications) published in
the Federal Register on August 2, 1994 (59 FR 39382). These devices
test for the presence of alcohol using breath or bodily fluids such as
saliva. The Model Specifications support State laws that target
youthful offenders (i.e., ``zero tolerance'' laws) and the Department
of Transportation's regulations on Alcohol Misuse Prevention, and
encourage industry efforts to develop new technologies (e.g., non-
breath devices) that measure alcohol content from bodily fluids.
This notice removed testing of Interpretive Screening Devices
(ISDs) and use of the Breath Alcohol Sample Simulator (BASS) device
from the Model Specifications. The ISDs did not provide an unambiguous
test result, as test results for ISDs are subjective and require
interpretation by a test administrator or technician. Because the
agency has determined the BASS device is not necessary for inclusion in
the Model Specifications, this notice removes all references to the
BASS device.
Additionally, in order to ensure product integrity, this notice
provides guidelines for retesting devices when manufacturers
contemplate changes, revisions, or upgrades to alcohol screening
devices on the Conforming Products List (CPL).
These revisions to the Model Specifications will not affect devices
currently listed on the CPL.
DATES: Effective Date: Revisions to these Model Specifications become
effective on March 31, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical issues: Ms. De Carlo
Ciccel, Behavioral Research Division, NTI-131, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590; Telephone: (202) 366-1694. For legal issues: Mr. David Bonelli,
Office of Chief Counsel, NCC-113, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
Telephone: (202) 366-5834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
As indicated in the Model Specifications published in 1994, the
agency will modify and improve the Model Specifications as new data and
test procedures become available and will alter the test procedures, as
necessary, to meet unique design features of specific devices. Since
publication of the Model Specifications, the agency encountered
difficulties ensuring the accuracy of testing ISDs and also determined
the use of the BASS is not necessary for inclusion in the Model
Specifications. These events made it necessary to revise the Model
Specifications.
On December 14, 2007, (72 FR 71188), NHTSA proposed and sought
comments on amendments and revisions to the Model Specifications
published in 1994. In the notice, NHTSA explained that the 1994 Model
Specifications allowed for evaluation of screening devices that require
subjective interpretation of test results by a test administrator or
technician. These ISDs differ from devices that provide objective test
results, including the use of digital technology or the appearance of
lights or marks based on the presence or absence of alcohol. For
instance, use of pass/fail lights or enzymes that react with alcohol to
produce an unambiguous mark provide objective test results. Also, the
1994 Model Specifications required that interpretive devices be
evaluated subjectively under five lighting conditions (fluorescent,
incandescent, mercury, sodium and daylight) by a panel of ten novice
evaluators who are not color blind. Since publication of the 1994 Model
Specifications, NHTSA evaluated eight separate ISDs. Of those eight ISD
evaluations, none resulted in a successful outcome in the panel test
described above. In one evaluation, the device passed the test under
all lighting conditions except sodium. This device is no longer
manufactured. Although many novice evaluators were able to judge the
correct test outcome in the eight ISD evaluations, some could not, even
though the manufacturers' instructions were conveyed to the evaluators
and all evaluators passed tests to determine their color perception
ability. This subjective interpretation of test results does not ensure
accuracy and precision required to protect public safety. Due to
repeated problems in evaluating ISDs, NHTSA proposed to remove
altogether testing of ISDs and all references to interpretive or color
indicator tests from the Model Specifications.
The 1994 Model Specifications provided for the use of the Breath
Alcohol Sample Simulator (BASS) device for delivering alcohol-in-air
test samples. The use of the BASS device is not necessary for inclusion
in the Model Specifications because the BASS device is intended for use
in testing the sampling efficiency of evidential breath testers. There
is no sampling efficiency test in the Model Specifications for alcohol
screening devices. The alcohol-in-air test sample for breath alcohol
screening devices is supplied by a calibrating unit. Therefore, the
agency proposed to remove all references to the BASS device from the
Model Specifications.
The 1994 Model Specifications also provide procedures to conduct
special investigations and re-test a device if information gathered
indicates that a device listed on the CPL is not performing in
accordance with the Model Specifications. The agency proposed the
addition of Appendix B to provide guidance regarding notification and
re-testing when manufacturers contemplate revisions to devices listed
on the CPL. The proposed Appendix follows the language used in the
Model Specifications for evidential breath testing devices (58 FR
48705). Upon notification by a manufacturer of a contemplated change to
a device listed
[[Page 16957]]
on the CPL, NHTSA proposed that it would determine whether re-testing
is required. Such determination would look at several factors,
including the nature and reason for the change, the scope of the
change, the effects of the change on the performance of the device, and
how the change will be documented for the benefit of the user. NHTSA
would list device revisions and whether re-testing was required in the
next update to the CPL. Appendix B also would state that NHTSA may re-
test any device listed on the CPL at any time to determine continued
compliance and performance with the Model Specifications. A device
found not to perform in accordance with the Model Specifications would
be subject to the special investigation procedures discussed below.
Having received no comments on any aspect of the agency's proposal,
this notice adopts the proposed revisions, including the ``Procedures''
and ``Model Specifications for Alcohol Screening Devices,'' without
change.
II. Procedures
This section describes the current procedures. The DOT Volpe
National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC), RTV-4F, Kendall Square,
Cambridge, MA 02142 tests products manufacturers submit to determine
whether the products meet the model specifications. Tests are conducted
semiannually, or as necessary. Manufacturers are required to apply to
NHTSA for a test date by writing to the Office of Behavioral Safety
Research, NTI-130, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590. At least 30 days are typically required from the date of
notification until the test can be scheduled.
One week prior to the scheduled initiation of the test program,
manufacturers must deliver their devices to VNTSC. If the devices are
disposable, the manufacturer must deliver at least 300 such devices; if
the devices are reusable, the manufacturer need submit only a single
device. If a manufacturer of a reusable device wishes to submit a
duplicate, backup instrument, it may so do. The manufacturer is
responsible for ensuring that the devices operate properly and are
packaged correctly. The manufacturer must also deliver the operator's
manual (or instructions) and the maintenance manual (if any) that is to
be supplied with the purchase of the device, as well as specifications
and drawings fully describing the device and its use. Information
determined to be proprietary will be respected. (See 49 CFR Part 512,
regarding the procedure by which NHTSA will consider claims of
confidentiality.)
In addition, the manufacturer must submit a self-certification,
certifying that the manufacturer meets the requirements according to
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Good Manufacturing
Practices regulations for devices used for medical purposes (21 CFR
Part 820), and that the device's label meets the requirements in FDA's
Labeling regulations for devices used for medical purposes (21 CFR Part
809.10), even if the devices are not to be used for medical purposes.
See Appendix A to this notice.
The manufacturer has the right to check its device(s) between the
time of arrival at VNTSC and the start of the tests, but will have no
access to the device(s) during the tests. Any malfunction of a device
resulting in failure to complete any of the tests satisfactorily will
result in a determination that the device does not conform to the Model
Specifications. If a device is found not to conform to the Model
Specifications, it may be resubmitted for the next testing cycle after
appropriate corrections have been made. However, the agency reserves
the discretion to determine whether to conduct any retest.
The agency intends to update and republish the CPL in the Federal
Register annually. Republications of the CPL add conforming alcohol
screening devices tested since the last CPL republication.
NHTSA will continue to provide notification in the Federal Register
when the agency amends the Model Specifications as new data and test
procedures become available and will retest devices when necessary.
The NHTSA Office of Behavioral Safety Research is the point of
contact for information about acceptance testing and field performance
of devices that are in the marketplace. NHTSA requests that users of
alcohol screening devices provide both acceptance and field performance
data to the Office of Behavioral Safety Research when such data
indicate potential performance problems. Information from users will
help NHTSA monitor whether alcohol screening devices are performing
according to the NHTSA Model Specifications.
If information gathered indicates that a device on the CPL is not
performing in accordance with the Model Specifications, NHTSA may
direct VNTSC to conduct a special investigation. An investigation may
include visits to users and additional tests of devices obtained on the
open market. If the investigation indicates that a device actually sold
on the market does not meet the Model Specifications, the manufacturer
will be notified that the device may be removed from the CPL. In this
event, the manufacturer will have 30 days from the date of notification
to reply. Based on the VNTSC investigation and any data provided by the
manufacturer, NHTSA will decide whether the device should remain on the
CPL. If the device is removed from the CPL, the manufacturer will be
permitted to resubmit an improved device to VNTSC for testing when it
believes the problems causing its failure have been resolved. Upon
resubmission, the manufacturer must submit a statement describing what
has been done to overcome the problems that led to failure of the
device. The agency reserves the discretion to determine whether to
conduct any retest.
If information gathered indicates that the manufacturer of a device
on the CPL does not comply with the requirements in FDA's Good
Manufacturing Practices regulations for devices used for medical
purposes or that the device's label does not comply with the
requirements in FDA's labeling regulations for devices used for medical
purposes, NHTSA may investigate the matter in consultation with FDA and
will notify the manufacturer that the device may be removed from the
CPL. The manufacturer will have 30 days from the date of notification
to reply. Based on any data provided by the manufacturer and
investigative findings, NHTSA will decide whether the device should
remain on the CPL. If the device is removed from the CPL, the
manufacturer will be permitted to resubmit a self-certification,
certifying that the manufacturer or its device complies with these FDA
requirements when it believes the problems causing its non-compliance
have been resolved. Upon resubmission, the manufacturer must submit a
statement describing what has been done to overcome the problems that
led to non-compliance.
In accordance with the foregoing, the amendments of the Model
Specifications for Screening Devices to Measure Alcohol in Bodily
Fluids, are set forth below.
Model Specifications for Alcohol Screening Devices
1. Purpose and Scope
These specifications establish performance criteria and methods for
testing of alcohol screening devices. Alcohol screening devices use
bodily fluids to detect the presence of 0.020 or more BAC (see below)
with sufficient
[[Page 16958]]
accuracy for screening purposes. These specifications are intended
primarily for use in the conformance testing of alcohol screening
devices.
2. Classification
2.1 Disposable Alcohol Screening Devices.
Alcohol screening devices designed for a single use.
2.2 Reusable Alcohol Screening Devices.
Alcohol screening devices designed to be reused.
3. Definitions
3.1 Alcohol.
The intoxicating agent in beverage alcohol, ethyl alcohol or other
low molecular weight alcohols including methyl or isopropyl alcohol.
3.2 Alcohol Screening Device.
A device that is used to detect the presence of 0.020 or more BAC.
The device may measure any bodily fluid for this purpose, but shall
provide output in BAC units. Test results must be indicated
unambiguously by numerical read-out or by other means, such as by the
use of lights or by the appearance of a distinctive mark but not by
color change.
3.3 Blood alcohol concentration (BAC).
Grams alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or grams alcohol per 210
liters of breath in accordance with the Uniform Vehicle Code, Section
11-903(a)(5) \1\ (BrAC is often used to indicate that the measurement
is a breath measurement); or grams alcohol per 100 milliliters of
saliva.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Available from the National Committee on Uniform Traffic
Laws and Ordinances, 107 S. West Street, 10, Alexandria,
VA 22314. Web site address: https://www.ncutle.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.4 Calibrating Unit.
A device that produces an alcohol-in-air test sample of known
concentration and that meets the NHTSA Model Specifications for
Calibrating Units (72 FR 34742).
3.5 Bodily Fluid.
Any bodily fluid capable of being used to estimate alcohol
concentration, provided the relationship between such bodily fluid and
BAC has been established according to scientifically acceptable
standards. Such fluids include but are not limited to blood, exhaled
deep lung breath and saliva.
3.6 Scientifically Acceptable Substitutes.
Fluids that have been scientifically accepted as equivalent to
bodily fluids for testing purposes, such as aqueous alcohol test
solutions on a one-to-one basis for blood or saliva.
4. Test Methods and Requirements
Testing will be performed according to the instructions that
normally accompany the submitted device and under the conditions
specified in the tests below.
4.1 Test 1. Precision and Accuracy.
Perform 40 trials under normal laboratory conditions including 20
trials at 0.008 BAC and 20 trials at 0.032 BAC. Use a calibrating unit
for this test for breath devices and preparations of bodily fluids or
scientifically acceptable substitutes for non-breath devices. Perform
tests using a VNTSC investigator.
To conform at 0.008 BAC, not more than one positive result. To
conform at 0.032 BAC, not more than one non-positive result.
4.2 Test 2. Blank Reading.
Perform 20 trials under normal laboratory conditions at 0.000 BAC.
Use non-alcoholic human breath for breath devices and non-alcoholic
bodily fluids or scientifically acceptable substitutes for non-breath
devices. Perform tests using a VNTSC investigator.
To conform: no positive results. If the device is capable of
providing a reading of greater than 0.000 BAC and less than 0.020 BAC,
not more than one such result.
4.3 Test 3. Cigarette smoke interference (only breath and saliva
test devices).
Perform five trials at 0.000 BAC. Select an alcohol-free person who
smokes cigarettes for this test. Ask the person selected to smoke
approximately one half of a cigarette. Within one minute after smoking,
or after a waiting period specified in the manufacturer's instructions,
administer the alcohol screening device test according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Then ask the person to take another smoke
and repeat the test to produce a total of five trials.
To conform: no positive results.
4.4 Temperature.
Test at low and high ambient temperature.
4.4.1 Test 4.1. Low Ambient Temperature.
Perform 40 trials at 10 degrees Centigrade (C), including 20 trials
at 0.008 BAC and 20 trials at 0.032 BAC. Use a calibrating unit for
this test for breath devices and preparations of bodily fluids or
scientifically acceptable substitutes for non-breath devices.
To conform at 0.008 BAC, not more than one positive result. To
conform at 0.032 BAC, not more than one non-positive result.
4.4.2 Test 4.2 High Ambient Temperature.
Perform trials of 40 devices at 40 degrees C, including 20 trials
at 0.008 BAC and 20 trials at 0.032 BAC. Use a calibrating unit for
this test for breath devices and preparations of bodily fluids or
scientifically acceptable substitutes for non-breath devices.
To conform at 0.008 BAC, not more than one positive result. To
conform at 0.032 BAC, not more than one non-positive result.
4.5. Test 5. Vibration.
Perform 40 trials, including 20 trials at 0.008 BAC and 20 trials
at 0.032 BAC. Use a calibrating unit for this test for breath devices
and preparations of bodily fluids or scientifically acceptable
substitutes for non-breath devices.
Mount the screening device on a shake table and vibrate the table
in simple harmonic motion through each of its three major axes, as
specified below. Sweep through each frequency range in 2.5 minutes,
then reverse the sweep to the starting frequency in 2.5 minutes.
Disposable testers may be placed in a suitable box mounted on the shake
table. Test after vibration.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amplitude
(inches,
Frequency (hertz) peak to
peak)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 to 30................................................... 0.30
30 to 60................................................... 0.15
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To conform at 0.008 BAC, not more than one positive result. To
conform at 0.032 BAC not more than one non-positive result.
Appendix A--Labeling Instructions for Alcohol Screening Devices'
Intended Use Provide the intended use including the specimen matrix
(e.g. saliva, breath), the assay type (quantitative, semi-
quantitative), the purpose of performing the assay, and the individual
designated to perform the assay.
e.g.: This product is intended for the (quantitative, semi-
quantitative) determination of alcohol in --define matrix (for e.g.,
saliva, breath, sweat) to perform screening alcohol assays.
This product is recommended for use by individuals who have been
trained in the administration of screening devices.
Description of Testing System
Provide the principles of the procedure for performing the alcohol
screening assay.
e.g.: This product uses (alcohol dehydrogenase, infrared
technology, etc.) to perform the test.
Chemical Reaction Sequence
Describe the chemical reaction sequence, if applicable.
[[Page 16959]]
Reagents: List the concentration, strength, and composition of the
reactive ingredients.
List the non-reactive ingredients.
Reagent Preparation and Storage
Provide instructions for preparing the reagents, if applicable.
Provide instructions for storing the reagents, if applicable.
Provide any signs of deterioration of the reagents, if applicable.
Provide the reagents' shelf life and opened expiration dating, if
applicable.
e.g.: Tests in unopened packaging are stable until the date printed
on the product container when stored at 22-28 degrees C. If packaging
is opened, tests must be conducted at once.
Provide a caution not to use the reagents beyond the expiration
date.
Precautions
1. List any reagents that may be hazardous such as caustic
compounds, sodium azide or other hazardous reagents and instructions
for disposal, if applicable.
2. Provide warning to user to treat all samples as potentially
infective. Include instructions for handling and disposal of the
sample.
Specimen Collection
Provide instructions for collecting and handling the sample.
Provide criteria for specimen rejection, if applicable.
Calibration
Disposable tests are pre-calibrated. No additional calibration is
required.
Reusable (Instrumented) tests require calibration.
Provide information regarding how calibrations are to be conducted,
if applicable, including the number and concentration of calibrators,
and the frequency of calibration.
Provide instructions for calibration and recalibration.
Provide the criteria for acceptability of calibration.
Test Procedure (Disposable)
Provide adequate step-by-step instructions for performing the test
and determining the results.
Test Procedure (Re-usable/Instrumented)
Provide adequate step-by-step instruction for performing the test.
Provide the installation procedures and, if applicable, any special
requirements.
Provide the space and ventilation requirements.
Provide the description of the required frequency of equipment
maintenance and function checks.
Provide the instructions for any remedial action to be taken when
the equipment performs outside of its operating range.
Provide any operational precautions and limitations.
Provide instructions for the protection of equipment and
instrumentation from fluctuations or interruptions in electrical
current that could adversely affect test results and reports, if
applicable.
Quality Control (QC)
Disposable Tests
If applicable, the function and stability of the test can be
determined by the examination of the procedural ``built in'' controls
contained in the product. If these controls are not working, the test
is invalid and must be repeated.
Disposable/Instrumented Devices
If external quality control materials are used, provide the number,
type, matrix and concentration of the QC materials.
Provide directions for performing quality control procedures.
Provide an adequate description of the remedial action to be taken
when the QC results fail to meet the criteria for acceptability.
Provide directions for interpretation of the results of quality
control samples.
Results
Describe how the user obtains the test results, e.g., from an
instrument read-out, printout, etc.
Describe the results in terms of blood alcohol concentration.
Describe what concentration indicates a positive result and what
concentration indicates a negative result.
Limitations
List the substances or factors that may interfere with the test and
cause false results including technical or procedural errors.
Dynamic Range
Provide the operating range of the product.
Precision and Accuracy
Only devices that meet the precision and accuracy of these Model
Specifications will be included on NHTSA's Conforming Products List for
alcohol screening devices.
Specificity
List the substances that have been evaluated with your product that
do or do not interfere at the concentration indicated.
References
Provide pertinent bibliography.
Technical Assistance
List an 800 number the user may contact for further information or
technical assistance.
Appendix B--Guidelines for Re-testing of Modified Screening Devices
Manufacturers contemplating revisions to an alcohol screening
device listed on the Conforming Products List (CPL) are advised that
the revision may affect the status of the device on the CPL. The
manufacturer should inform NHTSA of the contemplated change so that a
judgment can be made whether or not re-testing the revised alcohol
screening device is necessary. The following lists the type of
information NHTSA uses in determining the necessity to re-test an
alcohol screening device, and is provided as guidance to manufacturers:
Manufacturer and Model Name.
Nature and reason for change(s).
Scope of change(s) (e.g., Will existing devices be
retrofitted? Will the change apply to some users but not others?)
Will the change(s) affect performance of the device with
regard to the Model Specifications? (Precision and accuracy, blank
reading, temperature operations, or vibrations.)
How will the change(s) be documented for the benefit of
the user? (e.g., Will the change(s) be documented in service bulletins
and/or service manuals? If not, why not?)
If necessary for clarity, drawings of the listed and changed device
may also be helpful in NHTSA's deliberations.
If, upon review of information provided by a manufacturer, it is
determined that re-testing is not warranted, a statement to that effect
will be included in the next scheduled CPL update.
NHTSA reserves the right to test any CPL-listed device on the open
market to determine continued compliance and performance in accordance
with these Model Specifications. Devices found not to comply with or
perform in accordance with the Model Specifications are subject to the
investigation provisions stated above in section II, Procedures.
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 403; 49 CFR 1.50; 49 CFR Part 501.
[[Page 16960]]
Issued on: March 25, 2008.
Marilena Amoni,
Associate Administrator for the Office of Research and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E8-6520 Filed 3-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P