Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 16740-16743 [E8-6455]
Download as PDF
16740
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 61 / Friday, March 28, 2008 / Notices
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Issued on: March 25, 2008.
Kathleen C. DeMeter,
Director, Office of Defects Investigation.
[FR Doc. E8–6454 Filed 3–27–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA–2008–
0057]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
revision to a currently approved
collection of information.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatement of previously approved
collections.
This document describes a collection
of information for which NHTSA
intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 27, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
using any of the following methods. All
comments must have the applicable
DOT docket number (e.g., NHTSA–
2008–0057) noted conspicuously on
them.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Telephone: 1–800–647–5527.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this proposed collection of
information. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
DocketInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Timian, Recall Management
Division (NVS–215), Room W46–324,
NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:
(202) 366–0209.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the
public and affected agencies concerning
each proposed collection of information.
The OMB has promulgated regulations
describing what must be included in
such a document. Under OMB’s
regulation, see 5 CFR 1320.8(d), an
agency must ask for public comment on
the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g. permitting
electronic submission of responses
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following collection of
information:
Title: Defect and Noncompliance
Reporting and Notification.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved information
collection.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0004.
Affected Public: Businesses or
individuals.
Abstract: This notice requests
comment on NHTSA’s proposed
revision to approved collection of
information OMB No. 2127–0004.
Broadly speaking, this collection covers
the information collection requirements
found within various statutory sections
in the Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966
(Act), 49 U.S.C. 30101, et seq., that
address and require manufacturer
notifications to NHTSA of safety-related
defects and failures to comply with
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) in motor vehicles and motor
vehicle equipment, as well as the
provision of particular information
related to the ensuing owner and dealers
notifications and free remedy campaigns
that follow those notifications. The
sections of the Act imposing these
requirements include 49 U.S.C. 30118,
30119, 30120, and 30166. Many of these
requirements are implemented through,
and addressed with more specificity in,
49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports (Part 573) and 49 CFR 577,
Defect and Noncompliance Notification.
For ease of reference and comment,
we have broken the information
collection requirements that OMB No.
2127–0004 covers into three categories.
The first two categories summarize
requirements already included in OMB
No. 2127–0004; the first discussing
requirements of defect and
noncompliance reporting and
notifications generally, and the second
discussing additional requirements that
pertain specifically to tire recalls and
the proper disposal of tires. The third
category summarizes our proposal to
include another collection requirement
related to tire recall campaigns, but in
the past treated separately and given a
different OMB information collection
approval number (2127–0610).
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 61 / Friday, March 28, 2008 / Notices
A. Information Collection Requirements
Applicable to Defect and
Noncompliance Reporting and
Notification Generally
Pursuant to the Act, motor vehicle
and motor vehicle equipment
manufacturers are obligated to notify,
and then provide various information
and documents to, NHTSA in the event
a safety defect or noncompliance with
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) is identified in products they
manufactured. See 49 U.S.C. 30118(b)
and 49 CFR 573.6 (requiring
manufacturers to notify NHTSA, and
provide certain information, when they
learn of a safety defect or
noncompliance). Manufacturers are
further required to notify owners,
purchasers, dealers and distributors
about the safety defect or
noncompliance. See 49 U.S.C. 30118(b),
30120(a), and 49 CFR 577.7, 577.13.
They are required to provide to NHTSA
copies of communications pertaining to
recall campaigns that they issue to
owners, purchasers, dealers, and
distributors. See 49 U.S.C. 30166(f) and
49 CFR 573.6(c)(10).
Manufacturers are also required to file
with NHTSA a plan explaining how
they intend to reimburse owners and
purchasers who paid to have their
products remedied before being notified
of the safety defect or noncompliance,
and explain that plan in the
notifications they issue to owners and
purchasers about the safety defect or
noncompliance. See 49 U.S.C. 30120(d)
and 49 CFR 573.13. They are further
required to keep lists of the respective
owners, purchasers, dealers,
distributors, lessors, and lessees of the
products determined to be defective or
noncompliant and involved in a recall
campaign, and are required to provide
NHTSA with a minimum of six
quarterly reports reporting on the
progress of their recall campaigns. See
49 CFR 573.8 and 573.7, respectively.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
B. Additional Information Collection
Requirements Applicable to Tire Recall
Campaigns and Proper Tire Disposal
The Act and Part 573 also contain
numerous information collection
requirements specific to tire recall and
remedy campaigns. These requirements
relate to the proper disposal of recalled
tires, including a requirement that the
manufacturer conducting the tire recall
submit a plan and provide specific
instructions to certain persons (such as
dealers and distributors) addressing that
disposal, and a requirement that those
persons report back to the manufacturer
certain deviations from the plan. See 49
U.S.C. 30120(d) and 49 CFR 573.6(c)(9).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
These requirements are in addition to
the general requirements previously
discussed. Due to the length and
complexity of these requirements, we
have outlined below those requirements
in order to make them more
comprehensible.
I. If there is a tire recall, which parties
must provide information?
A. The tire manufacturer conducting
the recall;
B. Any affected tire brand name
owners conducting the recall, such as
retail chain stores that sell recalled tires
under their own ‘‘private labels’’ or
house labels;
C. Any vehicle manufacturer that
conducts a tire recall;
D. Tire outlets under the control of a
manufacturer conducting a tire recall,
such as owned stores, franchised dealers
and/or distributors.
II. To which parties must the
information be provided?
A. Each manufacturer, whether a tire
manufacturer, tire brand name owner, or
a vehicle manufacturer conducting a
recall campaign for a tire, would have
to provide information to three
categories of parties:
1. NHTSA;
2. Owned stores, franchised dealers
and/or distributors (third parties);
3. Independent tire outlets authorized
to replace tires under the recall.
B. In the event of a recall, each tire
outlet under the control of a
manufacturer must provide information
to the manufacturer if the outlet does
not comply with certain requirements.
This is referred to as ‘‘exceptions
reporting’’ or ‘‘third party reporting,’’
and is discussed below in section IV.
III. What information must each
manufacturer provide?
A. In its report to NHTSA:
1. The manufacturer’s plan for
assuring that the entities replacing the
tires are aware of the legal requirements
related to recalls of tires established by
49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 and its
implementing regulations;
2. An explanation of how the
manufacturer will prevent, to the extent
within its control, the recalled tires from
being resold for installation on a motor
vehicle;
3. A description of the manufacturer’s
program for disposing of recalled tires
that are returned to the manufacturer or
collected by the manufacturer from
retail outlets, including, at a minimum,
statements that the returned tires will be
disposed of in compliance with
applicable state and local laws and
regulations regarding disposal of tires,
and will be channeled, insofar as
possible, into an ‘‘alternative beneficial
non-vehicular use’’ rather than being
disposed of in landfills; and
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16741
4. A draft of the notification(s) to be
sent to stores, dealers, etc. that is
described in section III.B, below.
B. In its reports to owned stores,
franchised dealers and/or distributors,
and independent outlets that are
authorized to replace the recalled tires:
1. A description of the legal
requirements related to recalls of tires
established by the Act and its
implementing regulations, including the
prohibitions on the sale of new and
used defective and noncompliant tires,
the right to reimbursement of the costs
of certain pre-notification remedies, and
the duty to notify NHTSA of a knowing
or willful sale or lease of a new or used
recalled tire that is intended for use on
a motor vehicle;
2. Directions to manufacturer-owned
and other manufacturer-controlled
outlets, and guidance to all other outlets
that are authorized to replace the
recalled tires, on how and when to alter
the recalled tires permanently so they
cannot be used on vehicles; and
3. Directions to manufacturer-owned
and other manufacturer-controlled
outlets, and guidance to all other outlets
that are authorized to replace the
recalled tires, either:
(a) To ship all recalled tires to one or
more locations designated by the
manufacturer as part of the
manufacturer’s recall program or to
allow the manufacturer to collect and
dispose of the recalled tires; or
(b) To ship recalled tires to a location
of their own choosing, provided that
they comply with applicable state and
local laws regarding disposal of tires,
along with directions and guidance on
how to limit the disposal of recalled
tires into landfills and instead, channel
them to an ‘‘alternative beneficial nonvehicular use.’’
Under Option (a), if the manufacturer
establishes a testing program for
recalled tires, the directions and
guidance shall also include criteria for
selecting recalled tires for the testing
program and instructions for labeling
those tires and returning them to the
manufacturer.
4. Directions to manufacturer-owned
and other manufacturer-controlled
outlets to report to the manufacturer on
a monthly basis the number of recalled
tires removed from vehicles by the
outlet that have not been rendered
unsuitable for resale for installation on
a motor vehicle within the specified
time frame and to describe any such
failure to comply with the
manufacturer’s plan.
IV. What information must tire outlets
under the control of the manufacturer
provide to the manufacturer (third party
reporting)?
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
16742
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 61 / Friday, March 28, 2008 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
A. Monthly (or within 30 days of the
deviation) reports on the number of
recalled tires, if any, removed from
vehicles by the outlet that have not been
rendered unsuitable for resale or
installation on a motor vehicle within
the specified time frame (other than
those returned for testing) and that
describe any such failure to act in
accordance with the manufacturer’s
plan;
B. Monthly (or within 30 days of the
deviation) reports on the number of
recalled tires disposed of in violation of
applicable state and local laws and
regulations that describe any such
failure to act in accordance with the
manufacturer’s plan.
V. Manufacturers’ Quarterly Reports
to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR 573.7 for
recalls involving the replacement of
tires must include the following
information:
A. The aggregate number of recalled
tires that the manufacturer becomes
aware have not been rendered
unsuitable for resale for installation on
a motor vehicle in accordance with the
manufacturer’s plan;
B. The aggregate number of recalled
tires that the manufacturer becomes
aware have been disposed of in
violation of applicable state and local
laws and regulations; and
C. A description of any failure of a tire
outlet to act in accordance with the
directions in the manufacturer’s plan,
including an identification of the outlet
in question.
VI. Recordkeeping Requirements
No recordkeeping requirements are
imposed by these requirements.
C. Addition of New Information
Collection Requirement: Reporting of
Sale or Lease of Defective or
Noncompliant Tires to NHTSA
The Act contains an additional
information collection requirement not
previously included in this approved
collection. 49 U.S.C. 30166(n), and its
implementing regulation found at 49
CFR 573.10, mandates that anyone who
knowingly and willfully sells or leases
for use on a motor vehicle a defective
tire or a tire that is not compliant with
FMVSS, and with actual knowledge that
the tire manufacturer has notified its
dealers of the defect or noncompliance
as required under the Act, is required to
report that sale or lease to NHTSA no
more than five working days after the
person to whom the tire was sold or
leased takes possession of it.
NHTSA had, in the past, sought and
received approval for this collection of
information, and it had been assigned
the approval number OMB No. 2127–
0610. Given this collection’s similarity
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
in purpose and subject matter to the
other collection requirements found in
the Act and in Part 573, the agency
believes it more appropriate and is
proposing to include it in this
information collection rather than keep
it separate. Comments are welcome on
this consolidation.
Estimated Burden: This collection has
a present estimated burden of 19,974
hours per year. Our review of recent
annual recall figures demonstrates to us
that this figure could be adjusted to
more precisely reflect recent experience.
Accordingly, we calculate that figure
should be revised to 21,370 burden
hours per year. An explanation of how
we reach this total annual figure
follows.
A. Estimated Burden Associated With
Defect and Noncompliance Reporting
and Notification Requirements
Generally
Over the past 3 years, there has been
an average of 650 noncompliance or
safety defect notifications to NHTSA
filed each year by approximately 175
distinct manufacturers, with an
estimated 750 quarterly reports filed per
quarter (or 3,000 reports per year).
We estimate that it takes a
manufacturer an average of 4 hours to
complete each notification report to
NHTSA, that it takes another 4 hours to
complete each quarterly report, and that
maintenance of the required owner,
purchaser, dealer and distributors lists
requires 8 hours. Accordingly, the
subtotal estimate of annual burden
hours related to the reporting to NHTSA
of a safety defect or noncompliance,
completion of quarterly reports on the
progress of recall campaigns, and
maintenance of owner and purchaser
lists is 16,000 hours annually ((650
notices × 4 hours/report) + (3,000
quarterly reports × 4 hours/report) +
(175 manufacturers × 8 hours)).
In addition, we estimate an additional
2 hours will be needed to add to a
manufacturer’s information report
details relating to the manufacturer’s
intended schedule for notifying its
dealers and distributors, and tailoring
its notifications to dealers and
distributors in accordance with the
requirements of 49 CFR 577.13. This
would total to an estimated 1,300 hours
annually (650 notices × 2 hours/report).
In the event a manufacturer supplied
the defect or noncompliant product to
independent dealers through
independent distributors, that
manufacturer is required to include in
its notifications to those distributors an
instruction that the distributors are to
then provide copies of the
manufacturer’s notification of the defect
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or noncompliance to all known
distributors or retail outlets further
down the distribution chain within five
working days. See 49 CFR
577.8(c)(2)(iv). As a practical matter,
this requirement would only apply to
equipment manufacturers since vehicle
manufacturers generally sell and lease
vehicles through a dealer network, and
not through independent distributors. In
recent years, there have been roughly 90
equipment recalls per year. Although
the distributors are not technically
under any regulatory requirement to
follow that instruction, we expect that
they will, and have estimated the
burden associated with these
notifications (identifying retail outlets,
making copies of the manufacturer’s
notice, and mailing) to be 5 hours per
recall campaign. Assuming an average
of 3 distributors per equipment item,
(which is a liberal estimate given that
many equipment manufacturers do not
use independent distributors) the total
number of burden hours associated with
this third party notification burden is
approximately 1,350 hours per year (90
recalls × 3 distributors × 5 hours).
As for the burden linked with a
manufacturer’s preparation of and
notification concerning its
reimbursement for pre-notification
remedies, consistent with previous
estimates (see 69 FR 11477 (March 10,
2004)), we estimate that preparing a
plan for reimbursement takes
approximately 8 hours annually, and
that an additional 2 hours per year is
spent tailoring the plan to particular
defect and noncompliance notifications
to NHTSA and adding tailored language
about the plan to a particular safety
recall’s owner notification letters. In
sum, these required activities add an
additional 2,700 annual burden hours
((175 manufacturers × 8 hours) + (650
recalls × 2 hours)).
In summary, the total burden
associated with the defect and
noncompliant information collection
and reporting requirements described in
this section is 21,350 hours per year.
B. Estimated Burden Associated With
Tire Recall Campaigns
As explained earlier, manufacturers
are required to include specific
information relative to tire disposal in
the notifications they provide NHTSA
concerning identification of a safety
defect or noncompliance with FMVSS
in their tires, as well as in the
notifications with they issue to their
dealers or other tire outlets participating
in the recall campaign. See 49 CFR
573.6(c)(9). Consistent with prior
projections, see 69 FR 21883 (April 22,
2004), and current experience, we
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 61 / Friday, March 28, 2008 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
estimate that there will be about 10 tire
recall campaigns per year, and that
inclusion of this additional information
will require an additional two hours of
effort beyond the subtotal above
associated with non-tire recall
campaigns. This additional effort
consists of one hour for the NHTSA
notification and one hour for the dealer
notification for a total of 20 burden
hours (10 tire recalls a year × 2 hours
per recall).
Also discussed earlier was the
requirement that manufacturer owned
or controlled dealers notify and provide
certain information should they deviate
from the manufacturer’s disposal plan.
Consistent with previous analysis, we
continue to ascribe zero burden hours to
this requirement since to date no such
reports have been provided and our
original expectation that dealers would
comply with manufacturers’ plans has
proven true.
Accordingly, we estimate 20 burden
hours a year will be spent complying
with the tire recall campaign
requirements found in 49 CFR
573.6(c)(9).
C. Estimated Burden Associated With
the Addition of the Requirement That
Intentional Sales and Leases of
Defective or Noncompliant Tires Be
Reported to NHTSA, to This
Information Collection
We have proposed and plan to
incorporate into this information
collection (OMB No. 2127–0004) the
requirement that those persons that sell
or lease defective or noncompliant tires
knowing that the manufacturer has
determined them to be defective or
noncompliant with FMVSS report those
sales or leases to NHTSA. We explained
that we are proposing and planning this
inclusion for the simple reason of
consolidation. The requirement is found
in Part 573, and given that today’s
information collection concerns
information collections found within
that Part, we do not see a basis for
keeping this requirement separate from
all of the rest.
In the original Federal Register notice
we published announcing this
requirement and calculating its burden,
we estimated that roughly 9 persons a
year would report such sales or leases,
and that the reporting would require a
maximum of one-half of one hour to
accomplish. See 65 FR 81409 (December
26, 2000). In reviewing this collection
requirement, we found that in the seven
years since this requirement has been in
place we have yet to receive a single
report of a sale or lease of a defective or
noncompliant tire pursuant to this
information collection requirement.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
Consequently, we are revising our initial
estimate of the burden associated with
this requirement to zero burden hours.
Estimated Number of Respondents
Over the past several years NHTSA
has received reports of defect or
noncompliance from roughly 175
manufacturers per year. We have no
reason at this juncture to suspect this
annual figure will change in any
significant manner in the coming years.
Accordingly, we estimate that there will
continue to be approximately 175
manufacturers per year filing defect or
noncompliance reports and completing
the other information collection
responsibilities associated with those
filings.
We discussed above that we have yet
to receive a single report filed pursuant
to 49 CFR 573.10. This information
collection requirement, to reiterate,
requires anyone who sells or leases a
defective or noncompliant tire, with
knowledge of that tire’s defectiveness or
noncompliance, to report that sale or
lease to NHTSA. Given the lack of filing
history over many years, we estimate
that there will continue to be zero
reports filed and therefore zero
respondents as to this requirement.
In summary, we estimate that there
will be a total of 175 respondents per
year associated with OMB No. 2127–
0004.
Issued on: March 25, 2008.
Kathleen C. DeMeter,
Director, Office of Defects Investigation.
[FR Doc. E8–6455 Filed 3–27–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard;
Nissan
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document grants in full
the Nissan North America, Inc.’s
(Nissan) petition for exemption of the
Rogue vehicle line in accordance with
49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from the
Theft Prevention Standard. This
petition is granted because the agency
has determined that the antitheft device
to be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the parts-
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16743
marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541).
Nissan requested confidential treatment
for the information and attachments it
submitted in support of its petition. In
a letter dated November 6, 2007, the
agency granted the petitioner’s request
for confidential treatment.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2009 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, West Building,
W43–439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard’s
phone number is (202) 366–0846. Her
fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated October 26, 2007, Nissan
requested exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the theft
prevention standard (49 CFR Part 541)
for the MY 2009 Nissan Rogue vehicle
line. The petition requested an
exemption from parts-marking pursuant
to 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard,
based on the installation of an antitheft
device as standard equipment for the
entire vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant exemptions for
one of its vehicle lines per model year.
Nissan’s submission is considered a
complete petition as required by 49 CFR
543.7, in that it meets the general
requirements contained in 543.5 and the
specific content requirements of 543.6.
Nissan’s petition provided a detailed
description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components
of the antitheft device for the new
vehicle line. Although specific details of
the system’s operation, design,
effectiveness and durability have been
accorded confidential treatment,
NHTSA is, for the purposes of this
petition, disclosing the following
general information. Nissan will install
its passive, transponder-based
immobilizer device as standard
equipment on its Rogue vehicle line
beginning with MY 2009. Key
components of the antitheft device are
an engine electronic control module
(ECM), a passive immobilizer and a
transponder key. The immobilizer
system prevents normal operation of the
vehicle without the use of the key.
Nissan’s antitheft device will also have
an alarm feature. Nissan stated that its
alarm system is activated by opening
any door without the use of a key. Upon
activation of the alarm, the head lamps
will flash and the horn will sound.
Nissan also provided its own test
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 61 (Friday, March 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16740-16743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6455]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA-2008-0057]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on revision to a currently approved
collection of information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatement of previously approved collections.
This document describes a collection of information for which NHTSA
intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 27, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments using any of the following methods.
All comments must have the applicable DOT docket number (e.g., NHTSA-
2008-0057) noted conspicuously on them.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Telephone: 1-800-647-
5527.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this proposed collection of information. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://DocketInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Timian, Recall Management
Division (NVS-215), Room W46-324, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-0209.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must first publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulation, see 5 CFR
1320.8(d), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following collection of information:
Title: Defect and Noncompliance Reporting and Notification.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved information
collection.
OMB Control Number: 2127-0004.
Affected Public: Businesses or individuals.
Abstract: This notice requests comment on NHTSA's proposed revision
to approved collection of information OMB No. 2127-0004. Broadly
speaking, this collection covers the information collection
requirements found within various statutory sections in the Motor
Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (Act), 49 U.S.C. 30101, et seq., that
address and require manufacturer notifications to NHTSA of safety-
related defects and failures to comply with Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standards (FMVSS) in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment,
as well as the provision of particular information related to the
ensuing owner and dealers notifications and free remedy campaigns that
follow those notifications. The sections of the Act imposing these
requirements include 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30119, 30120, and 30166. Many of
these requirements are implemented through, and addressed with more
specificity in, 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports (Part 573) and 49 CFR 577, Defect and
Noncompliance Notification.
For ease of reference and comment, we have broken the information
collection requirements that OMB No. 2127-0004 covers into three
categories. The first two categories summarize requirements already
included in OMB No. 2127-0004; the first discussing requirements of
defect and noncompliance reporting and notifications generally, and the
second discussing additional requirements that pertain specifically to
tire recalls and the proper disposal of tires. The third category
summarizes our proposal to include another collection requirement
related to tire recall campaigns, but in the past treated separately
and given a different OMB information collection approval number (2127-
0610).
[[Page 16741]]
A. Information Collection Requirements Applicable to Defect and
Noncompliance Reporting and Notification Generally
Pursuant to the Act, motor vehicle and motor vehicle equipment
manufacturers are obligated to notify, and then provide various
information and documents to, NHTSA in the event a safety defect or
noncompliance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) is
identified in products they manufactured. See 49 U.S.C. 30118(b) and 49
CFR 573.6 (requiring manufacturers to notify NHTSA, and provide certain
information, when they learn of a safety defect or noncompliance).
Manufacturers are further required to notify owners, purchasers,
dealers and distributors about the safety defect or noncompliance. See
49 U.S.C. 30118(b), 30120(a), and 49 CFR 577.7, 577.13. They are
required to provide to NHTSA copies of communications pertaining to
recall campaigns that they issue to owners, purchasers, dealers, and
distributors. See 49 U.S.C. 30166(f) and 49 CFR 573.6(c)(10).
Manufacturers are also required to file with NHTSA a plan
explaining how they intend to reimburse owners and purchasers who paid
to have their products remedied before being notified of the safety
defect or noncompliance, and explain that plan in the notifications
they issue to owners and purchasers about the safety defect or
noncompliance. See 49 U.S.C. 30120(d) and 49 CFR 573.13. They are
further required to keep lists of the respective owners, purchasers,
dealers, distributors, lessors, and lessees of the products determined
to be defective or noncompliant and involved in a recall campaign, and
are required to provide NHTSA with a minimum of six quarterly reports
reporting on the progress of their recall campaigns. See 49 CFR 573.8
and 573.7, respectively.
B. Additional Information Collection Requirements Applicable to Tire
Recall Campaigns and Proper Tire Disposal
The Act and Part 573 also contain numerous information collection
requirements specific to tire recall and remedy campaigns. These
requirements relate to the proper disposal of recalled tires, including
a requirement that the manufacturer conducting the tire recall submit a
plan and provide specific instructions to certain persons (such as
dealers and distributors) addressing that disposal, and a requirement
that those persons report back to the manufacturer certain deviations
from the plan. See 49 U.S.C. 30120(d) and 49 CFR 573.6(c)(9). These
requirements are in addition to the general requirements previously
discussed. Due to the length and complexity of these requirements, we
have outlined below those requirements in order to make them more
comprehensible.
I. If there is a tire recall, which parties must provide
information?
A. The tire manufacturer conducting the recall;
B. Any affected tire brand name owners conducting the recall, such
as retail chain stores that sell recalled tires under their own
``private labels'' or house labels;
C. Any vehicle manufacturer that conducts a tire recall;
D. Tire outlets under the control of a manufacturer conducting a
tire recall, such as owned stores, franchised dealers and/or
distributors.
II. To which parties must the information be provided?
A. Each manufacturer, whether a tire manufacturer, tire brand name
owner, or a vehicle manufacturer conducting a recall campaign for a
tire, would have to provide information to three categories of parties:
1. NHTSA;
2. Owned stores, franchised dealers and/or distributors (third
parties);
3. Independent tire outlets authorized to replace tires under the
recall.
B. In the event of a recall, each tire outlet under the control of
a manufacturer must provide information to the manufacturer if the
outlet does not comply with certain requirements. This is referred to
as ``exceptions reporting'' or ``third party reporting,'' and is
discussed below in section IV.
III. What information must each manufacturer provide?
A. In its report to NHTSA:
1. The manufacturer's plan for assuring that the entities replacing
the tires are aware of the legal requirements related to recalls of
tires established by 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 and its implementing
regulations;
2. An explanation of how the manufacturer will prevent, to the
extent within its control, the recalled tires from being resold for
installation on a motor vehicle;
3. A description of the manufacturer's program for disposing of
recalled tires that are returned to the manufacturer or collected by
the manufacturer from retail outlets, including, at a minimum,
statements that the returned tires will be disposed of in compliance
with applicable state and local laws and regulations regarding disposal
of tires, and will be channeled, insofar as possible, into an
``alternative beneficial non-vehicular use'' rather than being disposed
of in landfills; and
4. A draft of the notification(s) to be sent to stores, dealers,
etc. that is described in section III.B, below.
B. In its reports to owned stores, franchised dealers and/or
distributors, and independent outlets that are authorized to replace
the recalled tires:
1. A description of the legal requirements related to recalls of
tires established by the Act and its implementing regulations,
including the prohibitions on the sale of new and used defective and
noncompliant tires, the right to reimbursement of the costs of certain
pre-notification remedies, and the duty to notify NHTSA of a knowing or
willful sale or lease of a new or used recalled tire that is intended
for use on a motor vehicle;
2. Directions to manufacturer-owned and other manufacturer-
controlled outlets, and guidance to all other outlets that are
authorized to replace the recalled tires, on how and when to alter the
recalled tires permanently so they cannot be used on vehicles; and
3. Directions to manufacturer-owned and other manufacturer-
controlled outlets, and guidance to all other outlets that are
authorized to replace the recalled tires, either:
(a) To ship all recalled tires to one or more locations designated
by the manufacturer as part of the manufacturer's recall program or to
allow the manufacturer to collect and dispose of the recalled tires; or
(b) To ship recalled tires to a location of their own choosing,
provided that they comply with applicable state and local laws
regarding disposal of tires, along with directions and guidance on how
to limit the disposal of recalled tires into landfills and instead,
channel them to an ``alternative beneficial non-vehicular use.''
Under Option (a), if the manufacturer establishes a testing program
for recalled tires, the directions and guidance shall also include
criteria for selecting recalled tires for the testing program and
instructions for labeling those tires and returning them to the
manufacturer.
4. Directions to manufacturer-owned and other manufacturer-
controlled outlets to report to the manufacturer on a monthly basis the
number of recalled tires removed from vehicles by the outlet that have
not been rendered unsuitable for resale for installation on a motor
vehicle within the specified time frame and to describe any such
failure to comply with the manufacturer's plan.
IV. What information must tire outlets under the control of the
manufacturer provide to the manufacturer (third party reporting)?
[[Page 16742]]
A. Monthly (or within 30 days of the deviation) reports on the
number of recalled tires, if any, removed from vehicles by the outlet
that have not been rendered unsuitable for resale or installation on a
motor vehicle within the specified time frame (other than those
returned for testing) and that describe any such failure to act in
accordance with the manufacturer's plan;
B. Monthly (or within 30 days of the deviation) reports on the
number of recalled tires disposed of in violation of applicable state
and local laws and regulations that describe any such failure to act in
accordance with the manufacturer's plan.
V. Manufacturers' Quarterly Reports to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR
573.7 for recalls involving the replacement of tires must include the
following information:
A. The aggregate number of recalled tires that the manufacturer
becomes aware have not been rendered unsuitable for resale for
installation on a motor vehicle in accordance with the manufacturer's
plan;
B. The aggregate number of recalled tires that the manufacturer
becomes aware have been disposed of in violation of applicable state
and local laws and regulations; and
C. A description of any failure of a tire outlet to act in
accordance with the directions in the manufacturer's plan, including an
identification of the outlet in question.
VI. Recordkeeping Requirements
No recordkeeping requirements are imposed by these requirements.
C. Addition of New Information Collection Requirement: Reporting of
Sale or Lease of Defective or Noncompliant Tires to NHTSA
The Act contains an additional information collection requirement
not previously included in this approved collection. 49 U.S.C.
30166(n), and its implementing regulation found at 49 CFR 573.10,
mandates that anyone who knowingly and willfully sells or leases for
use on a motor vehicle a defective tire or a tire that is not compliant
with FMVSS, and with actual knowledge that the tire manufacturer has
notified its dealers of the defect or noncompliance as required under
the Act, is required to report that sale or lease to NHTSA no more than
five working days after the person to whom the tire was sold or leased
takes possession of it.
NHTSA had, in the past, sought and received approval for this
collection of information, and it had been assigned the approval number
OMB No. 2127-0610. Given this collection's similarity in purpose and
subject matter to the other collection requirements found in the Act
and in Part 573, the agency believes it more appropriate and is
proposing to include it in this information collection rather than keep
it separate. Comments are welcome on this consolidation.
Estimated Burden: This collection has a present estimated burden of
19,974 hours per year. Our review of recent annual recall figures
demonstrates to us that this figure could be adjusted to more precisely
reflect recent experience. Accordingly, we calculate that figure should
be revised to 21,370 burden hours per year. An explanation of how we
reach this total annual figure follows.
A. Estimated Burden Associated With Defect and Noncompliance Reporting
and Notification Requirements Generally
Over the past 3 years, there has been an average of 650
noncompliance or safety defect notifications to NHTSA filed each year
by approximately 175 distinct manufacturers, with an estimated 750
quarterly reports filed per quarter (or 3,000 reports per year).
We estimate that it takes a manufacturer an average of 4 hours to
complete each notification report to NHTSA, that it takes another 4
hours to complete each quarterly report, and that maintenance of the
required owner, purchaser, dealer and distributors lists requires 8
hours. Accordingly, the subtotal estimate of annual burden hours
related to the reporting to NHTSA of a safety defect or noncompliance,
completion of quarterly reports on the progress of recall campaigns,
and maintenance of owner and purchaser lists is 16,000 hours annually
((650 notices x 4 hours/report) + (3,000 quarterly reports x 4 hours/
report) + (175 manufacturers x 8 hours)).
In addition, we estimate an additional 2 hours will be needed to
add to a manufacturer's information report details relating to the
manufacturer's intended schedule for notifying its dealers and
distributors, and tailoring its notifications to dealers and
distributors in accordance with the requirements of 49 CFR 577.13. This
would total to an estimated 1,300 hours annually (650 notices x 2
hours/report).
In the event a manufacturer supplied the defect or noncompliant
product to independent dealers through independent distributors, that
manufacturer is required to include in its notifications to those
distributors an instruction that the distributors are to then provide
copies of the manufacturer's notification of the defect or
noncompliance to all known distributors or retail outlets further down
the distribution chain within five working days. See 49 CFR
577.8(c)(2)(iv). As a practical matter, this requirement would only
apply to equipment manufacturers since vehicle manufacturers generally
sell and lease vehicles through a dealer network, and not through
independent distributors. In recent years, there have been roughly 90
equipment recalls per year. Although the distributors are not
technically under any regulatory requirement to follow that
instruction, we expect that they will, and have estimated the burden
associated with these notifications (identifying retail outlets, making
copies of the manufacturer's notice, and mailing) to be 5 hours per
recall campaign. Assuming an average of 3 distributors per equipment
item, (which is a liberal estimate given that many equipment
manufacturers do not use independent distributors) the total number of
burden hours associated with this third party notification burden is
approximately 1,350 hours per year (90 recalls x 3 distributors x 5
hours).
As for the burden linked with a manufacturer's preparation of and
notification concerning its reimbursement for pre-notification
remedies, consistent with previous estimates (see 69 FR 11477 (March
10, 2004)), we estimate that preparing a plan for reimbursement takes
approximately 8 hours annually, and that an additional 2 hours per year
is spent tailoring the plan to particular defect and noncompliance
notifications to NHTSA and adding tailored language about the plan to a
particular safety recall's owner notification letters. In sum, these
required activities add an additional 2,700 annual burden hours ((175
manufacturers x 8 hours) + (650 recalls x 2 hours)).
In summary, the total burden associated with the defect and
noncompliant information collection and reporting requirements
described in this section is 21,350 hours per year.
B. Estimated Burden Associated With Tire Recall Campaigns
As explained earlier, manufacturers are required to include
specific information relative to tire disposal in the notifications
they provide NHTSA concerning identification of a safety defect or
noncompliance with FMVSS in their tires, as well as in the
notifications with they issue to their dealers or other tire outlets
participating in the recall campaign. See 49 CFR 573.6(c)(9).
Consistent with prior projections, see 69 FR 21883 (April 22, 2004),
and current experience, we
[[Page 16743]]
estimate that there will be about 10 tire recall campaigns per year,
and that inclusion of this additional information will require an
additional two hours of effort beyond the subtotal above associated
with non-tire recall campaigns. This additional effort consists of one
hour for the NHTSA notification and one hour for the dealer
notification for a total of 20 burden hours (10 tire recalls a year x 2
hours per recall).
Also discussed earlier was the requirement that manufacturer owned
or controlled dealers notify and provide certain information should
they deviate from the manufacturer's disposal plan. Consistent with
previous analysis, we continue to ascribe zero burden hours to this
requirement since to date no such reports have been provided and our
original expectation that dealers would comply with manufacturers'
plans has proven true.
Accordingly, we estimate 20 burden hours a year will be spent
complying with the tire recall campaign requirements found in 49 CFR
573.6(c)(9).
C. Estimated Burden Associated With the Addition of the Requirement
That Intentional Sales and Leases of Defective or Noncompliant Tires Be
Reported to NHTSA, to This Information Collection
We have proposed and plan to incorporate into this information
collection (OMB No. 2127-0004) the requirement that those persons that
sell or lease defective or noncompliant tires knowing that the
manufacturer has determined them to be defective or noncompliant with
FMVSS report those sales or leases to NHTSA. We explained that we are
proposing and planning this inclusion for the simple reason of
consolidation. The requirement is found in Part 573, and given that
today's information collection concerns information collections found
within that Part, we do not see a basis for keeping this requirement
separate from all of the rest.
In the original Federal Register notice we published announcing
this requirement and calculating its burden, we estimated that roughly
9 persons a year would report such sales or leases, and that the
reporting would require a maximum of one-half of one hour to
accomplish. See 65 FR 81409 (December 26, 2000). In reviewing this
collection requirement, we found that in the seven years since this
requirement has been in place we have yet to receive a single report of
a sale or lease of a defective or noncompliant tire pursuant to this
information collection requirement. Consequently, we are revising our
initial estimate of the burden associated with this requirement to zero
burden hours.
Estimated Number of Respondents
Over the past several years NHTSA has received reports of defect or
noncompliance from roughly 175 manufacturers per year. We have no
reason at this juncture to suspect this annual figure will change in
any significant manner in the coming years. Accordingly, we estimate
that there will continue to be approximately 175 manufacturers per year
filing defect or noncompliance reports and completing the other
information collection responsibilities associated with those filings.
We discussed above that we have yet to receive a single report
filed pursuant to 49 CFR 573.10. This information collection
requirement, to reiterate, requires anyone who sells or leases a
defective or noncompliant tire, with knowledge of that tire's
defectiveness or noncompliance, to report that sale or lease to NHTSA.
Given the lack of filing history over many years, we estimate that
there will continue to be zero reports filed and therefore zero
respondents as to this requirement.
In summary, we estimate that there will be a total of 175
respondents per year associated with OMB No. 2127-0004.
Issued on: March 25, 2008.
Kathleen C. DeMeter,
Director, Office of Defects Investigation.
[FR Doc. E8-6455 Filed 3-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P