American Family Life Insurance Company, et al., 15799-15805 [E8-5919]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 25, 2008 / Notices
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, Virginia 22312; or send an
e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: March 17, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–5920 Filed 3–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Rel. No. IC–28197; File No. 812–13445]
American Family Life Insurance
Company, et al.
March 19, 2008.
U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
order under Section 26(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’).
AGENCY:
American Family Life
Insurance Company (the ‘‘Company’’),
American Family Variable Account I
(the ‘‘Life Account’’), and American
Family Variable Account II (the
‘‘Annuity Account,’’ and together with
the Company and Life Account, the
‘‘Applicants’’).
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
request an order of the Commission,
pursuant to Section 26(c) of the Act,
approving the substitution of (1) Service
Class Shares of the Fidelity Variable
Insurance Products Investment Grade
Bond Portfolio (‘‘Replacement Portfolio
A’’) of the Fidelity Variable Insurance
Products Fund V (‘‘Fidelity Fund’’) for
shares of the Federated Quality Bond
Fund II (‘‘Replaced Portfolio A’’) of the
Federated Insurance Series (‘‘Federated
Fund’’) and (2) shares of the Vanguard
International Portfolio (‘‘Replacement
Portfolio B’’) of the Vanguard Variable
Insurance Fund (‘‘Vanguard Fund’’) for
shares of the Federated International
Equity Fund II (‘‘Replaced Portfolio B’’)
of the Federated Fund, currently held by
the Life Account and the Annuity
Account (each an ‘‘Account,’’ together,
the ‘‘Accounts’’) to support variable life
insurance and annuity contracts issued
by the Company (collectively, the
‘‘Contracts’’).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
APPLICANTS:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:33 Mar 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
The application was filed
on November 2, 2007 and amended and
restated on March 14, 2008.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission and serving Applicants
with a copy of the request, personally or
by mail. Hearing requests must be
received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on April 15, 2008, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on
Applicants in the form of an affidavit or,
for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Hearing requests should state the nature
of the requester’s interest, the reason for
the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Secretary of the
Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Applicants, c/o James F. Eldridge, Esq.,
American Family Life Insurance
Company, 6000 American Parkway,
Madison, Wisconsin 53783–0001. Copy
to Thomas E. Bisset, Esq., Sutherland
Asbill & Brennan LLP, 1275
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20004–2415.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Kosoff, Staff Attorney, at (202)
551–6754 or Harry Eisenstein, Branch
Chief, Office of Insurance Products,
Division of Investment Management, at
(202) 551–6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained for a fee from the
Public Reference Branch of the
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 (202–551–8090).
FILING DATE:
Applicants’ Representations
1. The Company is a stock life
insurance company organized under
Wisconsin law in 1957. The company is
a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmFam,
Inc. AmFam, Inc. is a downstream
holding company and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of American Family Mutual
Insurance Company (‘‘American Family
Mutual’’). American Family Mutual is
one of the leading property/casualty
insurance companies in the United
States with operations in eighteen
states. As of December 31, 2006, the
Company had assets in excess of $4.2
billion.
2. The Company conducts a
conventional life insurance business
and is authorized to transact the
business of life insurance, including
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15799
annuities, in eighteen states. For
purposes of the Act, the Company is the
depositor and sponsor of each of the
Accounts as those terms have been
interpreted by the Commission with
respect to variable life insurance and
variable annuity separate accounts.
3. Under the insurance law of
Wisconsin, the assets of each Account
attributable to the Contracts issued
through that Account are owned by the
Company, but are held separately from
the other assets of the Company for the
benefit of the owners of, and the persons
entitled to payment under, those
Contracts. Each Account is registered
with the Commission as a unit
investment trust. Each Account is
comprised of a number of subaccounts
and each subaccount invests exclusively
in one of the insurance dedicated
mutual fund portfolios made available
as investment vehicles underlying the
Contracts. Currently, Replaced Portfolio
A and Replaced Portfolio B are each
available as an investment option under
the Company’s variable life insurance
and variable annuity contracts.
4. The Life Account is currently
divided into nine subaccounts. The
assets of the Life Account support
variable life insurance contracts and
interests in the Account offered through
such contracts have been registered
under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the ‘‘1933 Act’’), on Form N–
6 (File No. 333–44956).
5. The Annuity Account is currently
divided into nine subaccounts. The
assets of the Annuity Account support
variable annuity contracts and interests
in the Account offered through such
contracts have been registered under the
1933 Act on Form N–4 (File No. 333–
45592).
6. The Federated Fund is registered as
an open-end management investment
company under the Act (File No. 811–
08042) and currently offers twelve (12)
separate investment portfolios (each, a
‘‘Portfolio’’), two of which would be
involved in the proposed substitution.
The Federated Fund issues a separate
series of shares of beneficial interest in
connection with each Portfolio and has
registered those shares under the 1933
Act on Form N–1A (File No. 33–69268).
7. Federated Investment Management
Company (‘‘FIMC’’) serves as the
investment advisor for Replaced
Portfolio A. The advisor manages the
Fund’s assets, including buying and
selling portfolio securities. Federated
Advisory Services Company (‘‘FASC’’),
an affiliate of the advisor, provides
certain support services to the advisor.
The fee for FASC’s services is paid by
FIMC and not by the Fund.
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
15800
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 25, 2008 / Notices
8. Federated Global Investment
Management Corp. (‘‘FGIMC’’) serves as
the investment advisor for Replaced
Portfolio B. The advisor manages the
Fund’s assets, including buying and
selling portfolio securities. FASC
provides research, quantitative analysis,
equity trading and transaction
settlement and certain support services
to the advisor. The fee for FASC’s
services is paid by FGIMC and not by
the Fund.
9. Neither the Federated Fund, any of
its portfolios, FGIMC, FIMC, nor FASC
is affiliated with the Applicants. Neither
Replaced Portfolio A nor Replaced
Portfolio B has exemptive relief from
Section 15(a) of the Act and Rule 18f–
2 under the Act to permit the hiring of
sub-advisors and the revision of subadvisory agreements without obtaining a
shareholder vote (‘‘manager-of-manager
relief’’).
10. The Fidelity Fund is registered as
an open-end management investment
company under the Act (File No. 811–
05361) and currently offers twenty-three
(23) investment portfolios, including
Replacement Portfolio A. The Fidelity
Fund issues a series of shares of
beneficial interest in connection with
each portfolio and has registered such
shares under the 1933 Act on Form N–
1A (File No. 033–17704).
11. Each portfolio of the Fidelity Fund
has entered into an advisory agreement
with Fidelity Management and Research
Company (‘‘FMR’’) under which FMR
acts as investment advisor for the
portfolio. Under each investment
advisory agreement, FMR has overall
responsibility for the selection of
investments in accordance with the
investment objective, policies, and
limitations of the portfolio and for
handling the portfolio’s business affairs.
FMR, at its own expense, provides or
arranges for the provision of
substantially all management and
administrative services required by each
portfolio. Each portfolio of the Fidelity
Fund does, however, pay its own
auditor’s fees, compensation to (and
expenses of) trustees who are not
interested persons, independent counsel
fees, custodian fees and extraordinary
expenses.
12. Fidelity Investments Money
Management, Inc. (‘‘FIMM’’), an
investment advisor affiliate of FMR, has
entered into a sub-advisory agreement
with FMR under which FIMM acts as
sub-advisor for the Fidelity Fund,
including Replacement Portfolio A.
FIMM has day-to-day responsibility for
choosing investments for Replacement
Portfolio A. FMR pays FIMM for
providing sub-advisory services. As of
March 29, 2007, FMR and FIMM had
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:33 Mar 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
over $1.6 billion and $370 billion in
assets under management, respectively.
13. Fidelity Research & Analysis
Company (‘‘FRAC’’), an affiliate of FMR,
also serves as sub-advisor for the
Fidelity Fund and may provide
investment research and advice for the
Fidelity Fund, including Replacement
Portfolio A.
14. Fidelity International Investment
Advisors (‘‘FIIA’’) and Fidelity
International Investment Advisors
(U.K.) Limited (‘‘FIIA(U.K.)’’)
investment advisor affiliates of FMR,
assist FMR with the investment and
reinvestment of assets in Replacement
Portfolio A in foreign investments. FIIA
and FIAA(U.K.) have each entered into
a sub-advisory agreement with FMR and
each acts as sub-advisor to Replacement
Fund A. Under the sub-advisory
agreements, FMR may receive from FIIA
and FIAA(U.K.) investment research
and advice on issuers based outside the
United States and, in particular, makes
minimal credit risk and comparable
quality determinations for foreign
issuers that issue U.S. dollardenominated securities. FMR or FIMM
pays FIIA for providing sub-advisory
services. In turn, FIIA pays FIIA(U.K.)
for providing sub-advisory services.
15. Neither the Fidelity Fund, any of
its portfolios, FMR, FIMM, FRAC, FIIA
nor FIAA(U.K.) is affiliated with the
Applicants. The Fidelity Fund does not
have manager-of-managers relief.
16. The Vanguard Variable Insurance
Fund is registered as an open-end
management investment company
under the Act (File No. 811–05962) and
currently offers fifteen (15) portfolios.
The Vanguard Fund issues a series of
shares of beneficial interest in
connection with each portfolio and has
registered such shares under the 1933
Act on Form N–1A (File No. 33–32216).
17. The Vanguard Fund uses a multimanager approach to investing the
assets of Replacement Portfolio B, and
has entered into investment advisory
agreements with Baillie Gifford
Overseas Ltd. (‘‘Baillie Gifford’’) and
Schroder Investment Management North
America Inc. (‘‘Schroders’’). The board
of trustees of the Vanguard Fund
designates the proportion of
Replacement Portfolio B assets to be
managed by each advisor, and may
change those proportions at any time.
Under the supervision and oversight of
the trustees and officers of the Vanguard
Fund, each advisor independently
selects and maintains a portfolio of
common stocks for its assigned portion
of the assets of Replacement Portfolio B.
The Fund pays each advisor a fee at the
end of each quarter.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18. Baillie Gifford—located at Carlton
Square, 1 Greenside Row, Edinburgh,
EH1 3AN, Scotland—is wholly-owned
by Baillie Gifford & Co., one of the
largest independently owned
investment management firms in the
United Kingdom. As of December 31,
2006, Baillie Gifford & Co. had assets
under management that totaled
approximately $95 billion.
19. Schroders has entered into a subadvisory agreement with its affiliate,
Schroder Investment Management North
America Limited (‘‘Schroder Limited’’),
pursuant to which Schroder Limited has
primary responsibility for choosing
investments for Schroder’s assigned
portion of the Replacement Portfolio B
assets. Schroders pays Schroder Limited
a portion of the management fees
payable to Schroders under the
management agreement between
Schroders and the Vanguard Fund. Both
Schroders and Schroder Limited are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of Schroders
plc, the ultimate parent of a large worldwide group of financial service
companies. As of September 30, 2006,
Schroders, together with its affiliated
companies, managed approximately
$229.4 billion in assets.
20. Neither the Vanguard Fund or any
of its portfolios, Baillie Gifford, or
Schroders is affiliated with the
Applicants. The Vanguard Fund has
manager-of-manager relief.1
21. The Contracts are flexible
premium variable annuity and variable
life insurance contracts. The variable
annuity Contracts provide for the
accumulation of values on a variable
basis, fixed basis, or both, during the
accumulation period, and provide
settlement or annuity payment options
on a fixed basis. The variable life
insurance Contracts provide for the
accumulation of values on a variable
basis, fixed basis, or both, throughout
the insured’s life, and for a substantial
death benefit upon the death of the
insured. Under each of the Contracts,
the Company reserves the right to
substitute shares of one Fund for shares
of another, or of another investment
portfolio, including a portfolio of a
different management company.
22. The Company proposes to
substitute Service Class shares of
Replacement Portfolio A for shares of
Replaced Portfolio A, and to substitute
shares of Replacement Portfolio B for
shares of Replaced Portfolio B held in
the Accounts (the ‘‘proposed
substitutions’’).
1 Vanguard Convertible Securities Fund, et al.,
Inv. Co. Act Rel. No. 26089 (June 25, 2003 (Order),
File No. 812–12380.
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 25, 2008 / Notices
23. The proposed substitutions are
part of an effort by the Company to
provide a portfolio selection within the
Contracts that: (1) Provides a more
competitive fee structure relative to
other funds in the asset class peer
group; (2) provides more competitive
long-term returns relative to other funds
in the asset class peer group; and (3)
maintains the goal of offering a mix of
investment options covering basic
categories in the risk/return spectrum.
15801
24. The following charts set out the
investment objectives, principal
investment strategies, and principal
investment risks of each Replaced and
Replacement Portfolio, as stated in their
respective prospectuses.
Replaced Portfolio A
Replacement Portfolio A
Federated Quality Bond Fund II
Investment Objective
Current income
Principal Investment Strategies
The fund invests in a diversified portfolio of investment-grade, fixed-income securities, consisting primarily of corporate debt securities,
U.S. government and privately issued mortgage-backed securities,
and U.S. Treasury and agency securities. The investment advisor
seeks to enhance the fund’s performance by allocating relatively
more of its portfolio to the security type that the advisor expects to
offer the best balance between current income and risk. Some of the
corporate debt securities in which the fund invests are considered to
be ‘‘foreign securities.’’ The fund may invest in derivative contracts to
implement its investment strategies.
Although the value of the Fund’s shares will fluctuate, the investment
advisor seeks to manage the magnitude of the fluctuation by limiting,
under normal market conditions, the Fund’s dollar-weighted average
maturity to between three and ten years and dollar-weighted average
duration to between three and seven years.
Principal Investment Risks
Interest Rate Risk. Prices of fixed-income securities generally fall when
interest rates rise. Interest rate changes have a greater effect on the
price of fixed-income securities with longer durations.
Credit Risk. Issuers of securities in which the fund may invest may default in the payment of interest or principal on securities when due.
Call and Prepayment Risk. An issuer of a security held by the fund
may redeem the security prior to maturity at a price below its current
market value.
Risks of Foreign Investing. Share price may be more affected by foreign economic and political conditions, taxation policies and accounting standards than would otherwise be the case.
Liquidity Risk. Fixed-income securities may be less readily marketable
and subject to greater fluctuation in price than other securities. Also,
the fund may not be able to sell a security or close out a derivative
contract when desired.
Fidelity VIP Investment Grade Bond Portfolio
Investment Objective
High current income consistent with preservation of capital.
Principal Investment Strategies
FMR normally invests at least 80% of the fund’s assets in investmentgrade debt securities (those of high and medium quality) of all types
and repurchase agreements for those securities. FMR manages the
fund to have an overall interest rate risk similar to the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index. The investment advisor allocates assets
across different market sectors and maturities and invests in domestic and foreign issuers. FMR analyzes the credit quality of the issuer,
security-specific features, current and potential future valuation, and
trading opportunities to select investments for the fund.
The fund may invest in lower-quality debt securities, sometimes referred to as ‘‘junk bond securities,’’ and in Fidelity’s central funds.
The fund may engage in transactions that have a leveraging effect.
Principal Investment Risks
Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a
debt security to decrease.
Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets can be more volatile than the U.S.
market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory,
market, or economic developments, and can perform differently than
the U.S. market.
Prepayment. The ability of an issuer of a debt security to repay principal prior to a security’s maturity can cause greater price volatility if
interest rates change.
Issuer-Specific Changes. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a
whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a
whole. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investmentgrade quality) involve greater risk of default or price changes due to
changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality
debt securities can be more volatile due to increased sensitivity to
adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
Leverage Risk. Leverage can increase market exposure and magnify
investment risks.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Replaced Portfolio B
Replacement Portfolio B
Federated International Equity Fund II
Investment Objective
Total return on assets by investing primarily in equity securities of companies based outside the United States. Total return will consist of
two components: (1) changes in the market value of portfolio securities (both realized and unrealized appreciation); and (2) income received from portfolio securities. Changes in market value are expected to comprise the largest component of total return.
Principal Investment Strategies
The investment advisor uses a ‘‘bottom-up’’ approach to stock selection
and selection of industry and country are secondary considerations.
The fund is not limited to investing according to any particular style
or size of company, or to maintaining minimum allocations to any
particular region or country. However, the investment advisor anticipates that normally the fund will primarily invest in mid-to large-capitalization companies based outside the United States that have been
selected using a growth style of stock selection. The fund may invest
up to 20% of its assets in foreign companies based in emerging markets.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:33 Mar 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Vanguard International Portfolio
Investment Objective
Long-term capital appreciation.
Principal Investment Strategies
The portfolio invests predominantly in the stocks of companies located
outside the United States. In selecting stocks, the portfolio’s investment advisors evaluate foreign markets around the world and
choose companies with above-average growth potential. The portfolio uses multiple investment advisors.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
15802
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 25, 2008 / Notices
Replaced Portfolio B
Replacement Portfolio B
Principal Investment Risks
Stock Market Risks. The value of equity securities in the fund’s portfolio will fluctuate and, as a result, the fund’s share price may decline
suddenly or over a sustained period of time.
Risks of Foreign Investing. Share price may be more affected by foreign economic and political conditions, taxation policies, and accounting and auditing standards than would otherwise be the case.
Currency Risks. Because the exchange rates for currencies fluctuate
daily, prices of the foreign market securities in which the fund invests
are more volatile than prices of securities traded exclusively in the
United States.
Emerging Market Risks. Securities issued or traded in emerging markets generally entail greater risks than securities issued or traded in
developed markets. Emerging market countries may have relatively
unstable governments and may present the risk of nationalization of
businesses, expropriation, confiscatory taxation or, in certain instances, reversion to closed market, centrally planned economies.
Liquidity Risks. Trading opportunities are more limited for equity securities that are not widely held. This may make it more difficult to sell or
buy a security at a favorable price or time. Consequently, the fund
may have to accept a lower price to sell a security, sell other securities to raise cash, or give up an investment opportunity, any of which
could have a negative effect on the fund’s performance.
Principal Investment Risks
Stock Market Risk. Stock market risk is the chance that stock prices
overall will decline. Stock markets tend to move in cycles, with periods of rising prices and periods of falling prices. In addition, investments in foreign stock markets can be riskier than U.S. stock investments. The prices of foreign stocks and the prices of U.S. stocks
have, at times, moved in opposite directions.
Investment Style Risk. Investment style risk is the chance that returns
from non-U.S. growth stocks, and, to the extent that the portfolio is
invested in them, small- and mid-capitalizations stocks, will trail returns from the overall domestic stock market. Historically, small- and
mid-cap stocks have been more volatile in price than large-cap
stocks that dominate the market, and they often perform quite differently.
Country Risk/Regional Risk. Country risk/regional risk is the chance
that domestic events—such as political upheaval, financial troubles,
or natural disasters—will weaken a country’s or region’s securities
markets. Because the portfolio may invest a large portion of its assets in securities of companies located in any one country or region,
its performance may be hurt disproportionately by the poor performance of investments in that area. Country/regional risk is especially
high in emerging markets.
Currency Risk. Currency risk is the chance that the value of a foreign
investment, measured in U.S. dollars, will decrease because of unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates.
Manager Risk. Manager risk is the chance that poor security selection
will cause the portfolio to underperform relevant benchmarks or other
funds with a similar investment objective.
25. The following charts compare
advisory fees, other expenses, total
operating expenses (before and after any
waivers and reimbursements), and
portfolio turnover rates for the year
ended December 31, 2006, expressed as
an annual percentage of average daily
net assets, of the Replaced and
Replacement Portfolios. Although
Replacement Portfolio A is subject to a
distribution (12b–1) fee of the Act, and
none currently applies to Replaced
Portfolio A, the net operating expenses
for Replacement Portfolio A are still
significantly less than the total
operating expenses for Replaced
Portfolio A.2 Neither the Replaced
Portfolios nor the Replacement
Portfolios impose a redemption fee.
Replaced Portfolio
A
Replacement Portfolio
A
Federated Quality
Bond Fund II
(percent)
Fidelity VIP Investment
Grade Bond Portfolio
(percent)
Advisory Fee ................................................................................................................................
Distribution (12b–1) Fee ..............................................................................................................
Other Expenses ...........................................................................................................................
Total Operating Expenses ...........................................................................................................
Less Expense Waivers and Reimbursements ............................................................................
Net Operating Expenses .............................................................................................................
Portfolio Turnover Rate ...............................................................................................................
0.60
0.25
0.39
1.24
b 0.54
0.70
64
0.32
a 0.10
0.12
0.54
N/A
0.54
34
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
a With regard to Replacement Portfolio A, its Service Class is authorized to pay a 12b–1 fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of its average net assets, or such lesser amount as the Portfolio’s Trustees may determine from time to time. The Service Class currently pays a 12b–1 fee at an annual rate of 0.10% of its average net assets throughout the month. The 12b–1 fee rate may be increased only when the Trustees believe that it
is in the best interests of variable product owners to do so.
b With regard to Replaced Portfolio A, the investment adviser waived and the distributor and shareholder services provider elected not to
charge certain amounts. The investment adviser voluntarily waived a portion of the advisory fee which waiver the investment adviser may terminate at any time. The advisory fee paid by Replaced Portfolio A (after the voluntary waiver of the advisory fee) was 0.56% for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006. Replaced Portfolio A did not pay or accrue the distribution (12b–1) fee during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006. The prospectus for Replaced Portfolio A notes that there is no present intention for Replaced Portfolio A to pay or accrue a distribution
(12b–1) fee during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Also, Replaced Portfolio A did not pay or accrue the shareholder services fee/account administration fee during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Total other expenses for Replaced Portfolio A (after the voluntary
waiver of the shareholder services fee/account administration fee) were 0.14% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
2 With regard to the Replaced Portfolios, the
investment adviser for each Portfolio has entered
into an agreement with the Company for the
payment of a fee equal to an annual percentage of
the assets of the Replaced Portfolio attributable to
the Contracts for the performance of administrative
services. With regard to Replacement Portfolio A,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:33 Mar 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
the investment adviser for the Portfolio and the
Company have entered into a similar agreement,
however, the fee payable under that agreement is
significantly less than the fee payable under the
agreement between the Company and the
investment adviser for Replaced Portfolio A. With
regard to Replacement Portfolio B, the investment
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
adviser for the Portfolio and the Company have not
entered into a similar agreement. As such, the
Company will not receive revenue sharing
payments from the investment adviser for
Replacement Portfolio B.
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 25, 2008 / Notices
15803
Replaced Portfolio B
Replacement Portfolio
B
Federated International
Equity Fund II
(percent)
Vanguard International
Portfolio
(percent)
1.00
N/A
0.77
1.77
c 0.28
1.49
83
0.39
N/A
0.05
0.44
N/A
0.44
29
Advisory Fee ................................................................................................................................
Distribution (12b–1) Fee ..............................................................................................................
Other Expenses ...........................................................................................................................
Total Operating Expenses ...........................................................................................................
Less Expense Waivers and Reimbursements ............................................................................
Net Operating Expenses .............................................................................................................
Portfolio Turnover Rate ...............................................................................................................
c With regard to Replaced Portfolio B, the administrator and shareholder services provider waived and/or elected not to charge certain
amounts. Replaced Portfolio B did not pay or accrue a shareholder services fee during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The prospectus for Replaced Portfolio B notes that there is no present intention for Replaced Portfolio B to pay or accrue a shareholder services fee during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Also, the administrator voluntarily waived a portion of its fee which waiver the administrator may
terminate at any time. Total other expenses for Replaced Portfolio B (after the voluntary waivers and reduction) were 0.49% for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006.
26. The following tables compare the
respective asset levels, expenses ratios
(after expense waivers and
reimbursements) and performance data
for each Replaced Portfolio and each
Replacement Portfolio for fiscal years
2004, 2005 and 2006.
Net assets at
end of period
Expense ratio
(percent)
Total return
(percent)
Federated Quality Bond Fund II
2004 ...........................................................................................................................................
2005 ...........................................................................................................................................
2006 ...........................................................................................................................................
$518,023,000
480,859,000
390,738,000
0.70
0.70
0.70
3.62
1.30
4.15
1,611,417,000
1,649,333,000
1,782,079,000
0.66
0.58
0.54
4.32
2.08
4.30
53,093,000
58,700,000
70,213,000
1.57
1.58
1.49
14.06
9.08
18.89
557,000,000
840,000,000
1,562,000,000
0.41
0.41
0.44
19.42
16.31
26.75
Fidelity VIP Investment Grade Bond Portfolio
2004 ...........................................................................................................................................
2005 ...........................................................................................................................................
2006 ...........................................................................................................................................
Federated International Equity Fund II
2004 ...........................................................................................................................................
2005 ...........................................................................................................................................
2006 ...........................................................................................................................................
Vanguard International Portfolio
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
2004 ...........................................................................................................................................
2005 ...........................................................................................................................................
2006 ...........................................................................................................................................
27. Replaced Portfolio A, which has a
high concentration in corporate debt
securities, is positioned on the
conservative end of the risk/return
spectrum for fixed income investment
options and offered Contract owners a
fixed income option with limited risk.
Over the past seven years, Replaced
Portfolio A has significantly
underperformed its peers leading the
Company to reassess the position of its
fixed income investment option. In an
attempt to improve overall returns for
the fixed income investment option
while still maintaining a relatively low
level of risk, the Company decided to
select a fixed income investment option
which is more representative of the
overall bond market. Applicants believe
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:33 Mar 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
that Replacement Portfolio A meets this
goal.
28. The Company selected Replaced
Portfolio B to diversify the investment
options under the Contract to include a
portfolio selection that pursued
international investment opportunities.
The managers of Replaced Portfolio B
pursue positive total return on assets
invested primarily in equity securities
of mid- to large-capitalization
companies based outside the U.S. Over
the past five years, however, Replaced
Portfolio B has underperformed the
Morgan Stanley Capital International,
Europe, Australasia, Far East Index
(‘‘MSCI EAFE Index’’), the benchmark
used by Replaced Portfolio B as well as
peer funds. Replacement Portfolio B
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
uses a multiple manager approach to
pursue long-term capital appreciation
by investing primarily in non-U.S.
growth stocks of large, stable companies
diversified across countries that the
investment managers believe
demonstrate above-average growth
potential. Although the overall
characteristics of the assets of
Replacement Portfolio B may differ from
broad international stock indices, over
the past five years, the performance of
Replacement Portfolio B has, in each of
the last three years, exceeded the
performance of Replaced Portfolio B.
29. In the case of Replaced Portfolio
A, performance has been in the bottom
quartile for comparable funds over the
last three years, and has been lower than
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
15804
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 25, 2008 / Notices
its benchmark for the past five years. In
the case of Replaced Portfolio B,
performance ranks in the bottom decile
for comparable funds over the last 1-, 3, and 5-year periods.
30. The stated investment objective,
principal investment strategies and
principal investment risks of the
Replacement Portfolios are substantially
similar to those of the Replaced
Portfolios, so that Contract owners will
have continuity in investment and risk
expectations. The net expenses of each
Replacement Portfolio is substantially
less than those for the corresponding
Replaced Portfolio for the year ended
December 31, 2006, even after expense
waivers and reimbursements for the
Replaced Portfolio have been taken into
account.
31. Replacement Portfolio A has a
substantially identical investment
objective as that of Replaced Portfolio A.
Both pursue their investment objective
by investing, under normal market
conditions, in a diversified portfolio of
investment grade fixed-income
securities, consisting of corporate debt
securities, U.S government issued
mortgage-backed securities and U.S.
Treasury and agency securities. Each
retains the flexibility to invest in
corporate debt securities of foreign
issuers and in derivative instruments,
such as options, futures and swap
contracts.
32. The primary difference in the
implementation of investment strategies
of Replaced Portfolio A and
Replacement Portfolio A manifest in the
degree of flexibility exercised by their
advisors in implementing the strategies.
Replaced Portfolio A’s investment
advisor emphasizes an active trading
approach and relies on a fundamental
analysis of each company in making an
investment decision while the
investment advisor for Replacement
Portfolio A uses the Lehman Brothers
U.S. Aggregate Index (the ‘‘Lehman
Index’’) as the primary guide to
structure Replacement Portfolio A and
select investments with the goal of
managing Replacement Portfolio A to
have an overall interest rate risk similar
to the Lehman Index. Conversely,
whereas Replaced Portfolio A’s
investment advisor invests exclusively
in fixed-income securities rated
investment grade, the investment
advisor for Replacement Portfolio A is
not so constrained and may invest up to
10 percent of Replacement Portfolio A’s
assets in lower quality debt securities,
sometimes referred to as junk bond
securities.
33. Notwithstanding some difference
in the stated investment objectives of
Replacement Portfolio B and Replaced
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:33 Mar 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
Portfolio B, both emphasize capital
appreciation as the primary investment
objective and both follow substantially
identical investment strategies to pursue
their investment objectives. Both pursue
their investment objectives by investing
primarily in equity securities of wellcapitalized companies based outside the
United States that have favorable growth
prospects. The investment advisor for
Replaced Portfolio B and the investment
advisors for Replacement Portfolio B
each use an active management
approach and rely on a combination of
fundamental analysis of each company
and an analysis of stock market and
economic cycles before making an
investment decision. None of the
investment advisors are limited with
respect to the countries and industries
in which they may invest. Each
investment advisor retains the flexibility
to invest in securities issued by mid-cap
and small-cap companies as well as
securities of companies in emerging
markets.
34. The primary difference in
investment objectives of Replaced
Portfolio B and Replacement Portfolio B
manifests in the degree to which
Replaced Portfolio B emphasizes
income from portfolio securities as a
secondary investment objective. In that
regard, Replaced Portfolio B’s
investment advisor may purchase a
security solely to generate income or for
the potential to generate income without
regard to capital appreciation whereas
the investment advisors for
Replacement Portfolio B would not
purchase a security solely for that
purpose. Replaced Portfolio B also
places a slightly greater emphasis on
investment in securities of mid-cap
companies than Replacement Portfolio
B.
35. Replacement Portfolio A has
available to it transactional advantages
attributable to achieved economies of
scale greater than those of Replaced
Portfolio A and has a significantly lower
expense ratio than Replaced Portfolio A
even after expense waivers and
reimbursements for Replaced Portfolio
A have been taken into account.
Although Replacement Portfolio B has
not yet achieved a level of assets equal
to or greater than Replaced Portfolio B,
Replacement Portfolio B has a
significantly lower expense ratio than
Replaced Portfolio B even after expense
waivers and reimbursements for
Replaced Portfolio B have been taken
into account.
36. For Contract owners on the date
of the proposed substitutions, the
Company will reimburse, on the last
business day of each fiscal period (not
to exceed a fiscal quarter) during the
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
twenty-four months following the date
of the proposed substitutions, the
subaccount investing in the
Replacement Portfolio such that the sum
of the Replacement Portfolio’s operating
expenses (taking into account fee
waivers and expense reimbursements)
and subaccount expenses for such
period will not exceed, on an
annualized basis, the sum of the
corresponding Replaced Portfolio’s
operating expenses (taking into account
fee waivers and expense
reimbursements) and subaccount
expenses for the fiscal year preceding
the date of the proposed substitution. In
addition, for twenty-four months
following the proposed substitutions,
the Company will not increase assetbased fees or charges for Contracts
outstanding on the date of the proposed
substitutions.
37. By the May 1, 2008 prospectuses
for the Contracts and the Accounts, the
Company will notify owners of the
Contracts of their intention to take the
necessary actions to carry out the
proposed substitutions. The current
prospectus for each Replacement Fund,
as well as the current prospectuses for
all other portfolios available as
investment options available under the
Contracts, will be bound together with
the May 1, 2008 prospectuses for the
Contracts and the Accounts.
38. The prospectuses for the Contracts
will advise the Contract owners that
from the date of the prospectus until the
date of the proposed substitutions, the
Company will not exercise any rights
reserved by it under any Contract to
impose additional charges for transfers
until at least 30 days after the proposed
substitutions. Similarly, the prospectus
will disclose that, from May 1, 2008
until the date of the proposed
substitutions, the Company will permit
Contract owners to transfer Contract
value out of each subaccount currently
holding shares of a Replaced Portfolio to
other subaccounts and the fixed account
without those transfers being treated as
transfers for purposes of determining
the remaining number of transfers that
may be permitted in the Contract year
without a transfer charge. The
prospectuses will also advise Contract
owners that if the proposed
substitutions are carried out, then each
Contract owner affected by the
substitutions will be sent a written
notice (described immediately below)
informing them of the facts and details
of the substitutions.
39. Within five days after the
proposed substitutions, Contract owners
who are affected by the substitutions
will be sent a written notice informing
them that the substitutions were carried
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 25, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
out. The notice will also reiterate the
facts that the Company: (1) Will not
exercise any rights reserved by it under
any of the Contracts to impose
additional charges for transfers until at
least 30 days after the proposed
substitutions, and (2) will, for at least 30
days following the proposed
substitutions, permit such Contract
owners to transfer Contract values out of
the subaccounts holding shares of the
Replacement Portfolios to other
subaccounts and the fixed account
without those transfers being treated as
transfers for purposes of determining
the remaining number of transfers
permitted in the Contract year without
a transfer charge. The notice as
delivered in certain jurisdictions may
also explain that the right of a Contract
owner to make transfers in connection
with the proposed substitutions will not
affect such Contract owner’s right,
under insurance regulations in those
jurisdictions, to exchange his or her
Contract for a fixed-benefit life
insurance contract or a fixed-benefit
annuity Contract during the 60 days
following the substitutions.
40. The Company will carry out the
proposed substitutions by redeeming
shares of each Replaced Portfolio held
by the Accounts for cash and applying
the proceeds to the purchase of shares
of the Replacement Portfolios. The
proposed substitutions will take place at
relative net asset value with no change
in the amount of any Contract owner’s
Contract value or death benefit or in the
dollar value of his or her investment in
any of the Accounts. Contract owners
will not incur any fees or charges as a
result of the proposed substitutions, nor
will their rights or the Company’s
obligations under the Contracts be
altered in any way. All applicable
expenses incurred in connection with
the proposed substitutions, including
brokerage commissions and legal,
accounting, and other fees and
expenses, will be paid by the Company.
In addition, the proposed substitutions
will not impose any tax liability on
Contract owners. The proposed
substitutions will not cause the Contract
fees and charges currently being paid by
existing Contract owners to be greater
after the proposed substitutions than
before the proposed substitutions.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. The Applicants request that the
Commission issue an order pursuant to
Section 26(c) of the Act approving the
substitution by the Company of Service
Class shares of Replacement Portfolio A
for shares of Replaced Portfolio A, and
the substitution of shares of
Replacement Portfolio B for shares of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:33 Mar 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
Replaced Portfolio B held by the
Accounts.
2. The Applicants assert that all the
Contracts expressly reserve for the
Company the right, subject to
compliance with applicable law, to
substitute shares of one fund or
portfolio held by a subaccount of an
Account for another. The prospectuses
for the Contracts and the Accounts
contain appropriate disclosure of this
right.
3. Applicants maintain that Contract
owners will be better served by the
proposed substitutions and that the
proposed substitutions are appropriate
given the Replacement Portfolios, the
Replaced Portfolios, and other
investment options available under the
Contracts. In the last three years,
Replacement Portfolio A has had
investment performance superior to that
of Replaced Portfolio A, and
Replacement Portfolio B has had
investment performance superior to that
of Replaced Portfolio B. In addition,
Replacement Portfolio A has had
substantially lower expenses over this
same period than Replaced Portfolio A,
and Replacement Portfolio B has had
substantially lower expenses over this
same period than Replaced Portfolio B.
4. Applicants believe that
Replacement Portfolio A and Replaced
Portfolio A are substantially the same in
their stated investment objectives and
principal investment strategies, and that
Replacement Portfolio B and Replaced
Portfolio B are substantially similar in
their stated investment objectives and
principal investment strategies, as to
afford investors continuity of
investment and risk.
5. Although each Replaced Portfolio
benefits from an expense reimbursement
arrangement that reduces the Portfolio’s
expenses, even after the reimbursement
for each Replaced Portfolio has been
taken into account, the expenses of the
corresponding Replacement Portfolio
are still significantly lower.
6. The Applicants represent that the
proposed substitutions retain for
Contract owners the investment
flexibility that is a central feature of the
Contracts. If the proposed substitutions
are carried out, all Contract owners will
be permitted to allocate purchase
payments and transfer Contract values
between and among the remaining
subaccounts as they could before the
proposed substitutions.
7. The Applicants maintain that the
proposed substitutions are not the type
of substitution that Section 26(c) was
designed to prevent. Unlike traditional
unit investment trusts where a depositor
could only substitute an investment
security in a manner which
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15805
permanently affected all the investors in
the trust, the Contracts provide each
Contract owner with the right to
exercise his or her own judgment and
transfer Contract values into other
subaccounts and the fixed account.
Moreover, the Contracts will offer
Contract owners the opportunity to
transfer amounts out of the affected
subaccounts into any of the remaining
subaccounts without cost or
disadvantage. The proposed
substitutions, therefore, will not result
in the type of costly forced redemption
that Section 26(c) was designed to
prevent.
Conclusion
Applicants submit that, for all the
reasons stated above, the proposed
substitutions are consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–5919 Filed 3–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–57519; File No. SR–CBOE–
2008–29]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Extend Two Pilot
Programs
March 18, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 13,
2008, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The Exchange filed the proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder, which renders it effective
upon filing with the Commission.4 The
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15799-15805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-5919]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Rel. No. IC-28197; File No. 812-13445]
American Family Life Insurance Company, et al.
March 19, 2008.
AGENCY: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application for an order under Section 26(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ``Act'').
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: American Family Life Insurance Company (the ``Company''),
American Family Variable Account I (the ``Life Account''), and American
Family Variable Account II (the ``Annuity Account,'' and together with
the Company and Life Account, the ``Applicants'').
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order of the Commission,
pursuant to Section 26(c) of the Act, approving the substitution of (1)
Service Class Shares of the Fidelity Variable Insurance Products
Investment Grade Bond Portfolio (``Replacement Portfolio A'') of the
Fidelity Variable Insurance Products Fund V (``Fidelity Fund'') for
shares of the Federated Quality Bond Fund II (``Replaced Portfolio A'')
of the Federated Insurance Series (``Federated Fund'') and (2) shares
of the Vanguard International Portfolio (``Replacement Portfolio B'')
of the Vanguard Variable Insurance Fund (``Vanguard Fund'') for shares
of the Federated International Equity Fund II (``Replaced Portfolio
B'') of the Federated Fund, currently held by the Life Account and the
Annuity Account (each an ``Account,'' together, the ``Accounts'') to
support variable life insurance and annuity contracts issued by the
Company (collectively, the ``Contracts'').
Filing Date: The application was filed on November 2, 2007 and amended
and restated on March 14, 2008.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of the
Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests must be received by the
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on April 15, 2008, and should be accompanied by
proof of service on Applicants in the form of an affidavit or, for
lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the
nature of the requester's interest, the reason for the request, and the
issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may
request notification by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants, c/o James F. Eldridge,
Esq., American Family Life Insurance Company, 6000 American Parkway,
Madison, Wisconsin 53783-0001. Copy to Thomas E. Bisset, Esq.,
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, 1275 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20004-2415.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Kosoff, Staff Attorney, at
(202) 551-6754 or Harry Eisenstein, Branch Chief, Office of Insurance
Products, Division of Investment Management, at (202) 551-6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from
the Public Reference Branch of the Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 (202-551-8090).
Applicants' Representations
1. The Company is a stock life insurance company organized under
Wisconsin law in 1957. The company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
AmFam, Inc. AmFam, Inc. is a downstream holding company and a wholly-
owned subsidiary of American Family Mutual Insurance Company
(``American Family Mutual''). American Family Mutual is one of the
leading property/casualty insurance companies in the United States with
operations in eighteen states. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had
assets in excess of $4.2 billion.
2. The Company conducts a conventional life insurance business and
is authorized to transact the business of life insurance, including
annuities, in eighteen states. For purposes of the Act, the Company is
the depositor and sponsor of each of the Accounts as those terms have
been interpreted by the Commission with respect to variable life
insurance and variable annuity separate accounts.
3. Under the insurance law of Wisconsin, the assets of each Account
attributable to the Contracts issued through that Account are owned by
the Company, but are held separately from the other assets of the
Company for the benefit of the owners of, and the persons entitled to
payment under, those Contracts. Each Account is registered with the
Commission as a unit investment trust. Each Account is comprised of a
number of subaccounts and each subaccount invests exclusively in one of
the insurance dedicated mutual fund portfolios made available as
investment vehicles underlying the Contracts. Currently, Replaced
Portfolio A and Replaced Portfolio B are each available as an
investment option under the Company's variable life insurance and
variable annuity contracts.
4. The Life Account is currently divided into nine subaccounts. The
assets of the Life Account support variable life insurance contracts
and interests in the Account offered through such contracts have been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ``1933
Act''), on Form N-6 (File No. 333-44956).
5. The Annuity Account is currently divided into nine subaccounts.
The assets of the Annuity Account support variable annuity contracts
and interests in the Account offered through such contracts have been
registered under the 1933 Act on Form N-4 (File No. 333-45592).
6. The Federated Fund is registered as an open-end management
investment company under the Act (File No. 811-08042) and currently
offers twelve (12) separate investment portfolios (each, a
``Portfolio''), two of which would be involved in the proposed
substitution. The Federated Fund issues a separate series of shares of
beneficial interest in connection with each Portfolio and has
registered those shares under the 1933 Act on Form N-1A (File No. 33-
69268).
7. Federated Investment Management Company (``FIMC'') serves as the
investment advisor for Replaced Portfolio A. The advisor manages the
Fund's assets, including buying and selling portfolio securities.
Federated Advisory Services Company (``FASC''), an affiliate of the
advisor, provides certain support services to the advisor. The fee for
FASC's services is paid by FIMC and not by the Fund.
[[Page 15800]]
8. Federated Global Investment Management Corp. (``FGIMC'') serves
as the investment advisor for Replaced Portfolio B. The advisor manages
the Fund's assets, including buying and selling portfolio securities.
FASC provides research, quantitative analysis, equity trading and
transaction settlement and certain support services to the advisor. The
fee for FASC's services is paid by FGIMC and not by the Fund.
9. Neither the Federated Fund, any of its portfolios, FGIMC, FIMC,
nor FASC is affiliated with the Applicants. Neither Replaced Portfolio
A nor Replaced Portfolio B has exemptive relief from Section 15(a) of
the Act and Rule 18f-2 under the Act to permit the hiring of sub-
advisors and the revision of sub-advisory agreements without obtaining
a shareholder vote (``manager-of-manager relief'').
10. The Fidelity Fund is registered as an open-end management
investment company under the Act (File No. 811-05361) and currently
offers twenty-three (23) investment portfolios, including Replacement
Portfolio A. The Fidelity Fund issues a series of shares of beneficial
interest in connection with each portfolio and has registered such
shares under the 1933 Act on Form N-1A (File No. 033-17704).
11. Each portfolio of the Fidelity Fund has entered into an
advisory agreement with Fidelity Management and Research Company
(``FMR'') under which FMR acts as investment advisor for the portfolio.
Under each investment advisory agreement, FMR has overall
responsibility for the selection of investments in accordance with the
investment objective, policies, and limitations of the portfolio and
for handling the portfolio's business affairs. FMR, at its own expense,
provides or arranges for the provision of substantially all management
and administrative services required by each portfolio. Each portfolio
of the Fidelity Fund does, however, pay its own auditor's fees,
compensation to (and expenses of) trustees who are not interested
persons, independent counsel fees, custodian fees and extraordinary
expenses.
12. Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (``FIMM''), an
investment advisor affiliate of FMR, has entered into a sub-advisory
agreement with FMR under which FIMM acts as sub-advisor for the
Fidelity Fund, including Replacement Portfolio A. FIMM has day-to-day
responsibility for choosing investments for Replacement Portfolio A.
FMR pays FIMM for providing sub-advisory services. As of March 29,
2007, FMR and FIMM had over $1.6 billion and $370 billion in assets
under management, respectively.
13. Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (``FRAC''), an affiliate
of FMR, also serves as sub-advisor for the Fidelity Fund and may
provide investment research and advice for the Fidelity Fund, including
Replacement Portfolio A.
14. Fidelity International Investment Advisors (``FIIA'') and
Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited
(``FIIA(U.K.)'') investment advisor affiliates of FMR, assist FMR with
the investment and reinvestment of assets in Replacement Portfolio A in
foreign investments. FIIA and FIAA(U.K.) have each entered into a sub-
advisory agreement with FMR and each acts as sub-advisor to Replacement
Fund A. Under the sub-advisory agreements, FMR may receive from FIIA
and FIAA(U.K.) investment research and advice on issuers based outside
the United States and, in particular, makes minimal credit risk and
comparable quality determinations for foreign issuers that issue U.S.
dollar-denominated securities. FMR or FIMM pays FIIA for providing sub-
advisory services. In turn, FIIA pays FIIA(U.K.) for providing sub-
advisory services.
15. Neither the Fidelity Fund, any of its portfolios, FMR, FIMM,
FRAC, FIIA nor FIAA(U.K.) is affiliated with the Applicants. The
Fidelity Fund does not have manager-of-managers relief.
16. The Vanguard Variable Insurance Fund is registered as an open-
end management investment company under the Act (File No. 811-05962)
and currently offers fifteen (15) portfolios. The Vanguard Fund issues
a series of shares of beneficial interest in connection with each
portfolio and has registered such shares under the 1933 Act on Form N-
1A (File No. 33-32216).
17. The Vanguard Fund uses a multi-manager approach to investing
the assets of Replacement Portfolio B, and has entered into investment
advisory agreements with Baillie Gifford Overseas Ltd. (``Baillie
Gifford'') and Schroder Investment Management North America Inc.
(``Schroders''). The board of trustees of the Vanguard Fund designates
the proportion of Replacement Portfolio B assets to be managed by each
advisor, and may change those proportions at any time. Under the
supervision and oversight of the trustees and officers of the Vanguard
Fund, each advisor independently selects and maintains a portfolio of
common stocks for its assigned portion of the assets of Replacement
Portfolio B. The Fund pays each advisor a fee at the end of each
quarter.
18. Baillie Gifford--located at Carlton Square, 1 Greenside Row,
Edinburgh, EH1 3AN, Scotland--is wholly-owned by Baillie Gifford & Co.,
one of the largest independently owned investment management firms in
the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2006, Baillie Gifford & Co. had
assets under management that totaled approximately $95 billion.
19. Schroders has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with its
affiliate, Schroder Investment Management North America Limited
(``Schroder Limited''), pursuant to which Schroder Limited has primary
responsibility for choosing investments for Schroder's assigned portion
of the Replacement Portfolio B assets. Schroders pays Schroder Limited
a portion of the management fees payable to Schroders under the
management agreement between Schroders and the Vanguard Fund. Both
Schroders and Schroder Limited are wholly-owned subsidiaries of
Schroders plc, the ultimate parent of a large world-wide group of
financial service companies. As of September 30, 2006, Schroders,
together with its affiliated companies, managed approximately $229.4
billion in assets.
20. Neither the Vanguard Fund or any of its portfolios, Baillie
Gifford, or Schroders is affiliated with the Applicants. The Vanguard
Fund has manager-of-manager relief.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Vanguard Convertible Securities Fund, et al., Inv. Co. Act
Rel. No. 26089 (June 25, 2003 (Order), File No. 812-12380.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
21. The Contracts are flexible premium variable annuity and
variable life insurance contracts. The variable annuity Contracts
provide for the accumulation of values on a variable basis, fixed
basis, or both, during the accumulation period, and provide settlement
or annuity payment options on a fixed basis. The variable life
insurance Contracts provide for the accumulation of values on a
variable basis, fixed basis, or both, throughout the insured's life,
and for a substantial death benefit upon the death of the insured.
Under each of the Contracts, the Company reserves the right to
substitute shares of one Fund for shares of another, or of another
investment portfolio, including a portfolio of a different management
company.
22. The Company proposes to substitute Service Class shares of
Replacement Portfolio A for shares of Replaced Portfolio A, and to
substitute shares of Replacement Portfolio B for shares of Replaced
Portfolio B held in the Accounts (the ``proposed substitutions'').
[[Page 15801]]
23. The proposed substitutions are part of an effort by the Company
to provide a portfolio selection within the Contracts that: (1)
Provides a more competitive fee structure relative to other funds in
the asset class peer group; (2) provides more competitive long-term
returns relative to other funds in the asset class peer group; and (3)
maintains the goal of offering a mix of investment options covering
basic categories in the risk/return spectrum.
24. The following charts set out the investment objectives,
principal investment strategies, and principal investment risks of each
Replaced and Replacement Portfolio, as stated in their respective
prospectuses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replaced Portfolio A Replacement Portfolio A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federated Quality Bond Fund II Fidelity VIP Investment Grade Bond
Portfolio
Investment Objective Investment Objective
Current income High current income consistent with
preservation of capital.
Principal Investment Strategies Principal Investment Strategies
The fund invests in a diversified FMR normally invests at least 80%
portfolio of investment-grade, of the fund's assets in investment-
fixed-income securities, grade debt securities (those of
consisting primarily of corporate high and medium quality) of all
debt securities, U.S. government types and repurchase agreements
and privately issued mortgage- for those securities. FMR manages
backed securities, and U.S. the fund to have an overall
Treasury and agency securities. interest rate risk similar to the
The investment advisor seeks to Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond
enhance the fund's performance by Index. The investment advisor
allocating relatively more of its allocates assets across different
portfolio to the security type market sectors and maturities and
that the advisor expects to offer invests in domestic and foreign
the best balance between current issuers. FMR analyzes the credit
income and risk. Some of the quality of the issuer, security-
corporate debt securities in which specific features, current and
the fund invests are considered to potential future valuation, and
be ``foreign securities.'' The trading opportunities to select
fund may invest in derivative investments for the fund.
contracts to implement its
investment strategies.
Although the value of the Fund's The fund may invest in lower-
shares will fluctuate, the quality debt securities, sometimes
investment advisor seeks to manage referred to as ``junk bond
the magnitude of the fluctuation securities,'' and in Fidelity's
by limiting, under normal market central funds. The fund may engage
conditions, the Fund's dollar- in transactions that have a
weighted average maturity to leveraging effect.
between three and ten years and
dollar-weighted average duration
to between three and seven years.
Principal Investment Risks Principal Investment Risks
Interest Rate Risk. Prices of fixed- Interest Rate Changes. Interest
income securities generally fall rate increases can cause the price
when interest rates rise. Interest of a debt security to decrease.
rate changes have a greater effect Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets
on the price of fixed-income can be more volatile than the U.S.
securities with longer durations. market due to increased risks of
Credit Risk. Issuers of securities adverse issuer, political,
in which the fund may invest may regulatory, market, or economic
default in the payment of interest developments, and can perform
or principal on securities when differently than the U.S. market.
due. Prepayment. The ability of an
Call and Prepayment Risk. An issuer issuer of a debt security to repay
of a security held by the fund may principal prior to a security's
redeem the security prior to maturity can cause greater price
maturity at a price below its volatility if interest rates
current market value. change.
Risks of Foreign Investing. Share Issuer-Specific Changes. The value
price may be more affected by of an individual security or
foreign economic and political particular type of security can be
conditions, taxation policies and more volatile than the market as a
accounting standards than would whole and can perform differently
otherwise be the case. from the value of the market as a
Liquidity Risk. Fixed-income whole. Lower-quality debt
securities may be less readily securities (those of less than
marketable and subject to greater investment-grade quality) involve
fluctuation in price than other greater risk of default or price
securities. Also, the fund may not changes due to changes in the
be able to sell a security or credit quality of the issuer. The
close out a derivative contract value of lower-quality debt
when desired. securities can be more volatile
due to increased sensitivity to
adverse issuer, political,
regulatory, market, or economic
developments.
Leverage Risk. Leverage can
increase market exposure and
magnify investment risks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replaced Portfolio B Replacement Portfolio B
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federated International Equity Fund Vanguard International Portfolio
II
Investment Objective Investment Objective
Total return on assets by investing Long-term capital appreciation.
primarily in equity securities of
companies based outside the United
States. Total return will consist
of two components: (1) changes in
the market value of portfolio
securities (both realized and
unrealized appreciation); and (2)
income received from portfolio
securities. Changes in market
value are expected to comprise the
largest component of total return.
Principal Investment Strategies Principal Investment Strategies
The investment advisor uses a The portfolio invests predominantly
``bottom-up'' approach to stock in the stocks of companies located
selection and selection of outside the United States. In
industry and country are secondary selecting stocks, the portfolio's
considerations. The fund is not investment advisors evaluate
limited to investing according to foreign markets around the world
any particular style or size of and choose companies with above-
company, or to maintaining minimum average growth potential. The
allocations to any particular portfolio uses multiple investment
region or country. However, the advisors.
investment advisor anticipates
that normally the fund will
primarily invest in mid-to large-
capitalization companies based
outside the United States that
have been selected using a growth
style of stock selection. The fund
may invest up to 20% of its assets
in foreign companies based in
emerging markets.
[[Page 15802]]
Principal Investment Risks Principal Investment Risks
Stock Market Risks. The value of Stock Market Risk. Stock market
equity securities in the fund's risk is the chance that stock
portfolio will fluctuate and, as a prices overall will decline. Stock
result, the fund's share price may markets tend to move in cycles,
decline suddenly or over a with periods of rising prices and
sustained period of time. periods of falling prices. In
Risks of Foreign Investing. Share addition, investments in foreign
price may be more affected by stock markets can be riskier than
foreign economic and political U.S. stock investments. The prices
conditions, taxation policies, and of foreign stocks and the prices
accounting and auditing standards of U.S. stocks have, at times,
than would otherwise be the case. moved in opposite directions.
Currency Risks. Because the Investment Style Risk. Investment
exchange rates for currencies style risk is the chance that
fluctuate daily, prices of the returns from non-U.S. growth
foreign market securities in which stocks, and, to the extent that
the fund invests are more volatile the portfolio is invested in them,
than prices of securities traded small- and mid-capitalizations
exclusively in the United States. stocks, will trail returns from
Emerging Market Risks. Securities the overall domestic stock market.
issued or traded in emerging Historically, small- and mid-cap
markets generally entail greater stocks have been more volatile in
risks than securities issued or price than large-cap stocks that
traded in developed markets. dominate the market, and they
Emerging market countries may have often perform quite differently.
relatively unstable governments Country Risk/Regional Risk. Country
and may present the risk of risk/regional risk is the chance
nationalization of businesses, that domestic events--such as
expropriation, confiscatory political upheaval, financial
taxation or, in certain instances, troubles, or natural disasters--
reversion to closed market, will weaken a country's or
centrally planned economies. region's securities markets.
Liquidity Risks. Trading Because the portfolio may invest a
opportunities are more limited for large portion of its assets in
equity securities that are not securities of companies located in
widely held. This may make it more any one country or region, its
difficult to sell or buy a performance may be hurt
security at a favorable price or disproportionately by the poor
time. Consequently, the fund may performance of investments in that
have to accept a lower price to area. Country/regional risk is
sell a security, sell other especially high in emerging
securities to raise cash, or give markets.
up an investment opportunity, any Currency Risk. Currency risk is the
of which could have a negative chance that the value of a foreign
effect on the fund's performance. investment, measured in U.S.
dollars, will decrease because of
unfavorable changes in currency
exchange rates.
Manager Risk. Manager risk is the
chance that poor security
selection will cause the portfolio
to underperform relevant
benchmarks or other funds with a
similar investment objective.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
25. The following charts compare advisory fees, other expenses,
total operating expenses (before and after any waivers and
reimbursements), and portfolio turnover rates for the year ended
December 31, 2006, expressed as an annual percentage of average daily
net assets, of the Replaced and Replacement Portfolios. Although
Replacement Portfolio A is subject to a distribution (12b-1) fee of the
Act, and none currently applies to Replaced Portfolio A, the net
operating expenses for Replacement Portfolio A are still significantly
less than the total operating expenses for Replaced Portfolio A.\2\
Neither the Replaced Portfolios nor the Replacement Portfolios impose a
redemption fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ With regard to the Replaced Portfolios, the investment
adviser for each Portfolio has entered into an agreement with the
Company for the payment of a fee equal to an annual percentage of
the assets of the Replaced Portfolio attributable to the Contracts
for the performance of administrative services. With regard to
Replacement Portfolio A, the investment adviser for the Portfolio
and the Company have entered into a similar agreement, however, the
fee payable under that agreement is significantly less than the fee
payable under the agreement between the Company and the investment
adviser for Replaced Portfolio A. With regard to Replacement
Portfolio B, the investment adviser for the Portfolio and the
Company have not entered into a similar agreement. As such, the
Company will not receive revenue sharing payments from the
investment adviser for Replacement Portfolio B.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replaced Portfolio A Replacement Portfolio
----------------------- A
----------------------
Federated Quality Fidelity VIP
Bond Fund II Investment Grade Bond
(percent) Portfolio (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advisory Fee...................................................... 0.60 0.32
Distribution (12b-1) Fee.......................................... 0.25 \a\ 0.10
Other Expenses.................................................... 0.39 0.12
Total Operating Expenses.......................................... 1.24 0.54
Less Expense Waivers and Reimbursements........................... \b\ 0.54 N/A
Net Operating Expenses............................................ 0.70 0.54
Portfolio Turnover Rate........................................... 64 34
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ With regard to Replacement Portfolio A, its Service Class is authorized to pay a 12b-1 fee at an annual rate
of 0.25% of its average net assets, or such lesser amount as the Portfolio's Trustees may determine from time
to time. The Service Class currently pays a 12b-1 fee at an annual rate of 0.10% of its average net assets
throughout the month. The 12b-1 fee rate may be increased only when the Trustees believe that it is in the
best interests of variable product owners to do so.
\b\ With regard to Replaced Portfolio A, the investment adviser waived and the distributor and shareholder
services provider elected not to charge certain amounts. The investment adviser voluntarily waived a portion
of the advisory fee which waiver the investment adviser may terminate at any time. The advisory fee paid by
Replaced Portfolio A (after the voluntary waiver of the advisory fee) was 0.56% for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006. Replaced Portfolio A did not pay or accrue the distribution (12b-1) fee during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006. The prospectus for Replaced Portfolio A notes that there is no present intention
for Replaced Portfolio A to pay or accrue a distribution (12b-1) fee during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007. Also, Replaced Portfolio A did not pay or accrue the shareholder services fee/account administration fee
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Total other expenses for Replaced Portfolio A (after the
voluntary waiver of the shareholder services fee/account administration fee) were 0.14% for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006.
[[Page 15803]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replaced Portfolio B Replacement Portfolio
----------------------- B
----------------------
Federated Vanguard
International Equity International
Fund II (percent) Portfolio (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advisory Fee...................................................... 1.00 0.39
Distribution (12b-1) Fee.......................................... N/A N/A
Other Expenses.................................................... 0.77 0.05
Total Operating Expenses.......................................... 1.77 0.44
Less Expense Waivers and Reimbursements........................... \c\ 0.28 N/A
Net Operating Expenses............................................ 1.49 0.44
Portfolio Turnover Rate........................................... 83 29
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\c\ With regard to Replaced Portfolio B, the administrator and shareholder services provider waived and/or
elected not to charge certain amounts. Replaced Portfolio B did not pay or accrue a shareholder services fee
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The prospectus for Replaced Portfolio B notes that there is no
present intention for Replaced Portfolio B to pay or accrue a shareholder services fee during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007. Also, the administrator voluntarily waived a portion of its fee which waiver the
administrator may terminate at any time. Total other expenses for Replaced Portfolio B (after the voluntary
waivers and reduction) were 0.49% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
26. The following tables compare the respective asset levels,
expenses ratios (after expense waivers and reimbursements) and
performance data for each Replaced Portfolio and each Replacement
Portfolio for fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets at Expense ratio Total return
end of period (percent) (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federated Quality Bond Fund II
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004........................................................... $518,023,000 0.70 3.62
2005........................................................... 480,859,000 0.70 1.30
2006........................................................... 390,738,000 0.70 4.15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fidelity VIP Investment Grade Bond Portfolio
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004........................................................... 1,611,417,000 0.66 4.32
2005........................................................... 1,649,333,000 0.58 2.08
2006........................................................... 1,782,079,000 0.54 4.30
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federated International Equity Fund II
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004........................................................... 53,093,000 1.57 14.06
2005........................................................... 58,700,000 1.58 9.08
2006........................................................... 70,213,000 1.49 18.89
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanguard International Portfolio
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004........................................................... 557,000,000 0.41 19.42
2005........................................................... 840,000,000 0.41 16.31
2006........................................................... 1,562,000,000 0.44 26.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27. Replaced Portfolio A, which has a high concentration in
corporate debt securities, is positioned on the conservative end of the
risk/return spectrum for fixed income investment options and offered
Contract owners a fixed income option with limited risk. Over the past
seven years, Replaced Portfolio A has significantly underperformed its
peers leading the Company to reassess the position of its fixed income
investment option. In an attempt to improve overall returns for the
fixed income investment option while still maintaining a relatively low
level of risk, the Company decided to select a fixed income investment
option which is more representative of the overall bond market.
Applicants believe that Replacement Portfolio A meets this goal.
28. The Company selected Replaced Portfolio B to diversify the
investment options under the Contract to include a portfolio selection
that pursued international investment opportunities. The managers of
Replaced Portfolio B pursue positive total return on assets invested
primarily in equity securities of mid- to large-capitalization
companies based outside the U.S. Over the past five years, however,
Replaced Portfolio B has underperformed the Morgan Stanley Capital
International, Europe, Australasia, Far East Index (``MSCI EAFE
Index''), the benchmark used by Replaced Portfolio B as well as peer
funds. Replacement Portfolio B uses a multiple manager approach to
pursue long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in non-
U.S. growth stocks of large, stable companies diversified across
countries that the investment managers believe demonstrate above-
average growth potential. Although the overall characteristics of the
assets of Replacement Portfolio B may differ from broad international
stock indices, over the past five years, the performance of Replacement
Portfolio B has, in each of the last three years, exceeded the
performance of Replaced Portfolio B.
29. In the case of Replaced Portfolio A, performance has been in
the bottom quartile for comparable funds over the last three years, and
has been lower than
[[Page 15804]]
its benchmark for the past five years. In the case of Replaced
Portfolio B, performance ranks in the bottom decile for comparable
funds over the last 1-, 3-, and 5-year periods.
30. The stated investment objective, principal investment
strategies and principal investment risks of the Replacement Portfolios
are substantially similar to those of the Replaced Portfolios, so that
Contract owners will have continuity in investment and risk
expectations. The net expenses of each Replacement Portfolio is
substantially less than those for the corresponding Replaced Portfolio
for the year ended December 31, 2006, even after expense waivers and
reimbursements for the Replaced Portfolio have been taken into account.
31. Replacement Portfolio A has a substantially identical
investment objective as that of Replaced Portfolio A. Both pursue their
investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, in a
diversified portfolio of investment grade fixed-income securities,
consisting of corporate debt securities, U.S government issued
mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury and agency securities.
Each retains the flexibility to invest in corporate debt securities of
foreign issuers and in derivative instruments, such as options, futures
and swap contracts.
32. The primary difference in the implementation of investment
strategies of Replaced Portfolio A and Replacement Portfolio A manifest
in the degree of flexibility exercised by their advisors in
implementing the strategies. Replaced Portfolio A's investment advisor
emphasizes an active trading approach and relies on a fundamental
analysis of each company in making an investment decision while the
investment advisor for Replacement Portfolio A uses the Lehman Brothers
U.S. Aggregate Index (the ``Lehman Index'') as the primary guide to
structure Replacement Portfolio A and select investments with the goal
of managing Replacement Portfolio A to have an overall interest rate
risk similar to the Lehman Index. Conversely, whereas Replaced
Portfolio A's investment advisor invests exclusively in fixed-income
securities rated investment grade, the investment advisor for
Replacement Portfolio A is not so constrained and may invest up to 10
percent of Replacement Portfolio A's assets in lower quality debt
securities, sometimes referred to as junk bond securities.
33. Notwithstanding some difference in the stated investment
objectives of Replacement Portfolio B and Replaced Portfolio B, both
emphasize capital appreciation as the primary investment objective and
both follow substantially identical investment strategies to pursue
their investment objectives. Both pursue their investment objectives by
investing primarily in equity securities of well-capitalized companies
based outside the United States that have favorable growth prospects.
The investment advisor for Replaced Portfolio B and the investment
advisors for Replacement Portfolio B each use an active management
approach and rely on a combination of fundamental analysis of each
company and an analysis of stock market and economic cycles before
making an investment decision. None of the investment advisors are
limited with respect to the countries and industries in which they may
invest. Each investment advisor retains the flexibility to invest in
securities issued by mid-cap and small-cap companies as well as
securities of companies in emerging markets.
34. The primary difference in investment objectives of Replaced
Portfolio B and Replacement Portfolio B manifests in the degree to
which Replaced Portfolio B emphasizes income from portfolio securities
as a secondary investment objective. In that regard, Replaced Portfolio
B's investment advisor may purchase a security solely to generate
income or for the potential to generate income without regard to
capital appreciation whereas the investment advisors for Replacement
Portfolio B would not purchase a security solely for that purpose.
Replaced Portfolio B also places a slightly greater emphasis on
investment in securities of mid-cap companies than Replacement
Portfolio B.
35. Replacement Portfolio A has available to it transactional
advantages attributable to achieved economies of scale greater than
those of Replaced Portfolio A and has a significantly lower expense
ratio than Replaced Portfolio A even after expense waivers and
reimbursements for Replaced Portfolio A have been taken into account.
Although Replacement Portfolio B has not yet achieved a level of assets
equal to or greater than Replaced Portfolio B, Replacement Portfolio B
has a significantly lower expense ratio than Replaced Portfolio B even
after expense waivers and reimbursements for Replaced Portfolio B have
been taken into account.
36. For Contract owners on the date of the proposed substitutions,
the Company will reimburse, on the last business day of each fiscal
period (not to exceed a fiscal quarter) during the twenty-four months
following the date of the proposed substitutions, the subaccount
investing in the Replacement Portfolio such that the sum of the
Replacement Portfolio's operating expenses (taking into account fee
waivers and expense reimbursements) and subaccount expenses for such
period will not exceed, on an annualized basis, the sum of the
corresponding Replaced Portfolio's operating expenses (taking into
account fee waivers and expense reimbursements) and subaccount expenses
for the fiscal year preceding the date of the proposed substitution. In
addition, for twenty-four months following the proposed substitutions,
the Company will not increase asset-based fees or charges for Contracts
outstanding on the date of the proposed substitutions.
37. By the May 1, 2008 prospectuses for the Contracts and the
Accounts, the Company will notify owners of the Contracts of their
intention to take the necessary actions to carry out the proposed
substitutions. The current prospectus for each Replacement Fund, as
well as the current prospectuses for all other portfolios available as
investment options available under the Contracts, will be bound
together with the May 1, 2008 prospectuses for the Contracts and the
Accounts.
38. The prospectuses for the Contracts will advise the Contract
owners that from the date of the prospectus until the date of the
proposed substitutions, the Company will not exercise any rights
reserved by it under any Contract to impose additional charges for
transfers until at least 30 days after the proposed substitutions.
Similarly, the prospectus will disclose that, from May 1, 2008 until
the date of the proposed substitutions, the Company will permit
Contract owners to transfer Contract value out of each subaccount
currently holding shares of a Replaced Portfolio to other subaccounts
and the fixed account without those transfers being treated as
transfers for purposes of determining the remaining number of transfers
that may be permitted in the Contract year without a transfer charge.
The prospectuses will also advise Contract owners that if the proposed
substitutions are carried out, then each Contract owner affected by the
substitutions will be sent a written notice (described immediately
below) informing them of the facts and details of the substitutions.
39. Within five days after the proposed substitutions, Contract
owners who are affected by the substitutions will be sent a written
notice informing them that the substitutions were carried
[[Page 15805]]
out. The notice will also reiterate the facts that the Company: (1)
Will not exercise any rights reserved by it under any of the Contracts
to impose additional charges for transfers until at least 30 days after
the proposed substitutions, and (2) will, for at least 30 days
following the proposed substitutions, permit such Contract owners to
transfer Contract values out of the subaccounts holding shares of the
Replacement Portfolios to other subaccounts and the fixed account
without those transfers being treated as transfers for purposes of
determining the remaining number of transfers permitted in the Contract
year without a transfer charge. The notice as delivered in certain
jurisdictions may also explain that the right of a Contract owner to
make transfers in connection with the proposed substitutions will not
affect such Contract owner's right, under insurance regulations in
those jurisdictions, to exchange his or her Contract for a fixed-
benefit life insurance contract or a fixed-benefit annuity Contract
during the 60 days following the substitutions.
40. The Company will carry out the proposed substitutions by
redeeming shares of each Replaced Portfolio held by the Accounts for
cash and applying the proceeds to the purchase of shares of the
Replacement Portfolios. The proposed substitutions will take place at
relative net asset value with no change in the amount of any Contract
owner's Contract value or death benefit or in the dollar value of his
or her investment in any of the Accounts. Contract owners will not
incur any fees or charges as a result of the proposed substitutions,
nor will their rights or the Company's obligations under the Contracts
be altered in any way. All applicable expenses incurred in connection
with the proposed substitutions, including brokerage commissions and
legal, accounting, and other fees and expenses, will be paid by the
Company. In addition, the proposed substitutions will not impose any
tax liability on Contract owners. The proposed substitutions will not
cause the Contract fees and charges currently being paid by existing
Contract owners to be greater after the proposed substitutions than
before the proposed substitutions.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. The Applicants request that the Commission issue an order
pursuant to Section 26(c) of the Act approving the substitution by the
Company of Service Class shares of Replacement Portfolio A for shares
of Replaced Portfolio A, and the substitution of shares of Replacement
Portfolio B for shares of Replaced Portfolio B held by the Accounts.
2. The Applicants assert that all the Contracts expressly reserve
for the Company the right, subject to compliance with applicable law,
to substitute shares of one fund or portfolio held by a subaccount of
an Account for another. The prospectuses for the Contracts and the
Accounts contain appropriate disclosure of this right.
3. Applicants maintain that Contract owners will be better served
by the proposed substitutions and that the proposed substitutions are
appropriate given the Replacement Portfolios, the Replaced Portfolios,
and other investment options available under the Contracts. In the last
three years, Replacement Portfolio A has had investment performance
superior to that of Replaced Portfolio A, and Replacement Portfolio B
has had investment performance superior to that of Replaced Portfolio
B. In addition, Replacement Portfolio A has had substantially lower
expenses over this same period than Replaced Portfolio A, and
Replacement Portfolio B has had substantially lower expenses over this
same period than Replaced Portfolio B.
4. Applicants believe that Replacement Portfolio A and Replaced
Portfolio A are substantially the same in their stated investment
objectives and principal investment strategies, and that Replacement
Portfolio B and Replaced Portfolio B are substantially similar in their
stated investment objectives and principal investment strategies, as to
afford investors continuity of investment and risk.
5. Although each Replaced Portfolio benefits from an expense
reimbursement arrangement that reduces the Portfolio's expenses, even
after the reimbursement for each Replaced Portfolio has been taken into
account, the expenses of the corresponding Replacement Portfolio are
still significantly lower.
6. The Applicants represent that the proposed substitutions retain
for Contract owners the investment flexibility that is a central
feature of the Contracts. If the proposed substitutions are carried
out, all Contract owners will be permitted to allocate purchase
payments and transfer Contract values between and among the remaining
subaccounts as they could before the proposed substitutions.
7. The Applicants maintain that the proposed substitutions are not
the type of substitution that Section 26(c) was designed to prevent.
Unlike traditional unit investment trusts where a depositor could only
substitute an investment security in a manner which permanently
affected all the investors in the trust, the Contracts provide each
Contract owner with the right to exercise his or her own judgment and
transfer Contract values into other subaccounts and the fixed account.
Moreover, the Contracts will offer Contract owners the opportunity to
transfer amounts out of the affected subaccounts into any of the
remaining subaccounts without cost or disadvantage. The proposed
substitutions, therefore, will not result in the type of costly forced
redemption that Section 26(c) was designed to prevent.
Conclusion
Applicants submit that, for all the reasons stated above, the
proposed substitutions are consistent with the protection of investors
and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the
Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-5919 Filed 3-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P