Hull Identification Numbers for Recreational Vessels, 14193-14195 [E8-5326]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 52 / Monday, March 17, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Cessna Aircraft Company: Docket No. FAA–
2008–0331; Directorate Identifier 2008–
CE–009–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by May
16, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the following
airplane models and serial numbers that are
certificated in any category:
Models
Serial Nos.
208 ......
208B ....
20800001 through 20800415.
208B0001 through 208B1299.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of chafed
wiring found on wire bundles in the left and
right wings containing the auto-control wing
14193
de-ice system, fuel quantity indication, and
low fuel annunciation on several Cessna
Model 208B airplanes. We are proposing this
AD to detect and correct damaged wiring of
the auto-control wing de-ice system, fuel
quantity indication, and low fuel
annunciation systems. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in incorrect fuel
quantity indications, loss of low fuel quantity
annunciations, or loss of the auto-control
wing de-ice system.
Compliance
(e) To address this problem, you must do
the following, unless already done:
Actions
Compliance
Procedures
(1) Inspect the left and right wing electrical wire
bundles at the anchor attach points for loose
and damaged wiring.
Within the next 200 hours time-in-service after
the effective date of this AD, or within 12
months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever comes first.
Before further flight after the inspection required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD.
Follow Cessna Aircraft Company Service Bulletin CAB08–02, dated February 4, 2008.
Before further flight after the inspection required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD.
Follow Cessna Aircraft Company Service Bulletin CAB08–02, dated February 4, 2008.
(2) If, as a result of the inspection required by
paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, damaged wires
are found, repair or replace damaged wires
and properly attach wire bundle.
(3) If, as a result of the inspection required by
paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, loosely attached
wires were found, secure any wires that are
loosely attached and properly attach wire
bundle supporting hardware.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
(f) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Daniel Hilton,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Wichita ACO,
1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita,
Kansas 67209; telephone: 316–946–4173; email address: daniel.hilton@faa.gov. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
Related Information
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
(g) To get copies of the service information
referenced in this AD, contact Cessna Aircraft
Company, One Cessna Boulevard, P.O. Box
7706, Wichita, KS 67277–7704; telephone:
(316) 517–5800; fax: (316) 942–9006. To view
the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March
11, 2008.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–5269 Filed 3–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Mar 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 181
[Docket No. USCG–2007–29236]
Hull Identification Numbers for
Recreational Vessels
Coast Guard, DHS.
Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces it
is again requesting comments on the
costs and benefits of expanding the
existing 12-character Hull Identification
Number (HIN) in order to provide
additional information identifying
vessels. The Coast Guard requests
public comments on this issue and on
the specific questions in this Notice.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Docket Management
Facility on or before June 16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2007–29236 to the
Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Follow Cessna Aircraft Company Service Bulletin CAB08–02, dated February 4, 2008.
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
Philip Cappel, Office of Boating Safety,
Recreational Boating Product Assurance
Division, Coast Guard, telephone 202–
372–1076. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to submit
comments and related material on this
notice. All comments received will be
posted, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to use the Docket Management Facility.
Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’
paragraph below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a
comment, please include the docket
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
14194
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 52 / Monday, March 17, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
number for this notice (USCG–2007–
29236), and give the reason for each
comment. You may submit your
comments and material by electronic
means, mail, fax, or delivery to the
Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES; but please
submit your comments and material by
only one means. We recommend that
you include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that we can contact you if we have
questions regarding your submission.
For example, we may ask you to
resubmit your comment if we are not be
able to read your original submission. If
you submit them by mail or delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period.
Viewing the comments: To view the
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time, click
on ‘‘Search for Dockets,’’ and enter the
docket number for this notice (USCG–
2007–29236) in the Docket ID box, and
click enter. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the Department of
Transportation’s Privacy Act Statement
in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you
may visit https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Background and Purpose
The existing Hull Identification
Number (HIN) is a unique 12-character
serial number required on each
recreational vessel manufactured in or
imported into the United States for the
purposes of sale. The Coast Guard
assigns the first three characters, a
Manufacturer Identification Code (MIC),
which identifies the manufacturer or
importer; characters four through eight
are a manufacturer serial number;
characters nine and ten indicate date of
certification for vessels subject to safety
standards or the date of manufacture for
vessels not subject to standards; and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Mar 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
characters eleven and twelve indicate
the model year.
The proposed expanded HIN would
consist of five additional characters.
Four of the additional characters would
indicate length, hull material, principal
means of propulsion, and vessel type.
The fifth additional character would be
a check digit. The expanded HIN with
its check digit would reflect additional
information useful to law enforcement
authorities, marine bankers, marine
insurers, boating accident data analysts,
and marine investigators, and also
provide a useful means of identifying
vessels in the Vessel Identification
System (VIS). The VIS is only applicable
to recreational vessels that are registered
by a State (see 33 CFR 187.3).
The Secretary of the Department of
Homeland Security is required to
establish the VIS (46 U.S.C. chapters
125, 131 & 313) for use by the public
and law enforcement officials. The
Secretary has delegated to the
Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, the
authority to implement VIS. VIS will
provide a nationwide pool of vessel and
vessel owner information that will help
in the identification and recovery of
stolen vessels, deter vessel theft, and
will aid in homeland security.
Regulatory History
We published a Request for
Comments in the Federal Register on
November 16, 1998 (63 FR 63638),
soliciting comments on: (1) The
expected benefits of an expanded HIN
with vessel-specific characters and a
check digit; (2) the manner in which the
Coast Guard should exempt small
entities and the builders of highvolume, low-cost vessels, such as
canoes, kayaks, and inflatables; and (3)
the estimated burdens and costs to boat
manufacturers if the HIN regulations
were revised to require vessel-specific
characters and a check digit. The
comment period closed on February 16,
1999.
We received 31 comments, only one
of which contained any economic data
that could be used to determine the
benefits of a requirement for an
expanded HIN containing vesselspecific characters and a check digit.
Only four comments were in favor of
allowing exceptions for small entities
and the builders of high-volume, lowcost vessels, such as canoes, kayaks, and
inflatable boats. None of the comments
contained information about the
estimated burdens and costs to boat
manufacturers.
Discussion
States, bankers, insurers, and theft
and accident investigators favor an
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
expanded format. With vessel-specific
characters and a check digit it would
deter both vessel theft and the alteration
of HIN’s for fraudulent purposes and
could allow for more in-depth analysis
of accident data. In addition, there are
other people who favor the existing 12character HIN format.
A rulemaking to increase the number
of characters in the HIN to include
vessel-specific information could aid in
the recovery of stolen vessels, reduce
fraud, improve the accuracy of accident
data analysis, and help in the remote
identification of a ‘‘suspect’’ vessel. In
addition there may be other benefits
associated with expanding the existing
12-character HIN to include certain
vessel-specific information.
Investigations of lost and stolen
vessels depend, in large part, on the
proper authorities’ ability to identify a
vessel. The proposed regulations would
aid in this pursuit by expanding the
current 12-character HIN to include
detailed information about each vessel.
In addition, a check digit in the
expanded HIN would make alteration of
an HIN more difficult thereby helping to
prevent fraud in the sale of vessels.
Boating accident statistics are
compiled annually by the Coast Guard
from data received from the States and
territories through the Boating Accident
Report Database (BARD). These
statistics are analyzed to, among other
uses, determine the different causes of
accidents and what course(s) of action,
if any, may be taken by the Boating
Safety Program to reduce the number of
accidents. The accident analyses,
however, have been hindered by the
lack of specific descriptive information
regarding the vessels involved in the
accidents and/or the inaccuracy of the
vessel descriptive data provided in the
BARD system. Boating accident reports
are submitted by the owner/operator of
the vessel or, in the case of serious
accidents, by an investigating officer.
Since the accident information is being
provided by thousands of different
individuals the reports may not always
be accurate as to the exact description
of the vessel, which leads to
inaccuracies in the analyses of the
accident database. A 17-character HIN
with the additional descriptors built
into the HIN is expected to improve
both the scope and the accuracy of the
data analyses.
Adding vessel description
information to the HIN could also
improve the personal safety of State
water patrol officers by enabling them,
prior to boarding a vessel, through the
use of computer lookup of the vessel
registration number, to get an accurate
description of the vessel via the HIN
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 52 / Monday, March 17, 2008 / Proposed Rules
and alert them to approach with caution
if the description does not match the
vessel they are planning to board.
However, the Coast Guard lacks
detailed information about the
anticipated costs and benefits of the
expanded HIN format. Also, we still
believe that, if an expanded HIN format,
consisting of vessel-specific characters
and a check digit, is adopted, the Coast
Guard should be allowed to except
manufacturers that are small business
entities, and manufacturers of highvolume, low-cost vessels to minimize
costs and information collection
burdens.
Federal agencies with regulatory
programs are subject to regulations
implementing the Paperwork Reduction
Act which are enforced by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The
intent of the Act is to ensure that the
Federal Government imposes only the
minimum burden on the public in
collecting information and requiring the
maintenance of records, and that the
information collected or maintained is
necessary and useful. A regulation
requiring manufacturers to display
labels, such as HIN’s, is an example of
a collection of information requirement.
The Coast Guard encourages you to
comment on: (1) The expected benefits
and costs of an expanded Hull
Identification Number with vesselspecific characters and a check digit; (2)
the manner in which the Coast Guard
should except small entities and the
builders of high-volume, low-cost
vessels, such as canoes, kayaks, and
inflatables; (3) the estimated collection
of information burdens to boat
manufacturers if the current 12character HIN regulation were revised to
require additional vessel-specific
characters and a check digit; and (4)
possible alternatives to an expanded
HIN.
Data is needed to support a decisionmaking process. Therefore we
particularly need your help in
answering any of the following
questions (please provide arguments or
data to support each answer):
1. What are the expected benefits if
the HIN on a vessel included vesselspecific characters (e.g. vessel length,
hull material, means of propulsion, boat
type, and check digit)?
2. What are the estimated numbers of
thefts that might be prevented?
3. What are the estimated numbers of
additional lost or stolen vessels that
might be recovered?
4. What is the estimated value of
insurance company losses that might be
prevented?
5. What are the estimated numbers of
fraud attempts that might be prevented?
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Mar 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
6. What are the estimated reductions
in investigatory expenditures?
7. What are the expected benefits from
improved accident data analyses?
8. How long will it take and what will
it cost to determine a 17-character HIN?
9. How long will it take and what will
it cost to affix a 17-character HIN to the
hull of a vessel?
10. What are the measurable resources
such as labor and capital that you would
include in a cost-benefit analysis of a
17-character HIN implementation?
11. Should the Coast Guard consider
excepting all builders of non-powered
vessels?
12. Should the Coast Guard consider
excepting manufacturers of boats that
sell for less than a certain dollar value?
13. What alternatives are available
that would reduce adverse impacts on
small entities and builders of highvolume, low-cost vessels?
14. Should the Coast Guard consider
a phase-in period for compliance with a
17-character HIN regulation? What time
frame would be appropriate?
15. What are effective alternatives to
a 17-character HIN? Examples could
include the following:
a. Leave the current 12-character HIN
as is.
b. Implement the Vessel Identification
System in lieu of implementing a 17character HIN.
c. Develop a regulation requiring
uniform State titling/registration
policies.
d. Develop a regulation requiring a
uniform method to affix the HIN that
would reduce the likelihood of
tampering.
e. Increase security around shore and
harbor facilities (more officers, tracking/
monitoring devices).
f. Require other security measures
during vessel construction, such as
barcode HINs, radio frequency
identification tags, etc.
Dated: March 7, 2008.
James A. Watson,
Rear Admiral (Lower Half), U.S. Coast Guard,
Director of Prevention Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–5326 Filed 3–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14195
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
[Docket No. 080229341–8367–01]
RIN 0648–XF89
Listing Endangered and Threatened
Species and Designating Critical
Habitat: Notice of Finding on a Petition
to List Five Rockfish Species in Puget
Sound (Washington) as Endangered or
Threatened Species Under the
Endangered Species Act
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of finding; request for
information, and initiation of status
review.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On October 29, 2007, we,
NMFS, received new information and a
request to reconsider our ‘‘not
warranted’’ finding on a petition
submitted in April 2007 to list bocaccio
(Sebastes paucispinis), canary rockfish
(S. pinniger), yelloweye rockfish (S.
ruberrimus), greenstripe rockfish (S.
elongatus) and redstripe rockfish (S.
proriger) in Puget Sound (Washington)
as endangered or threatened species
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). We consider this a new petition
and find that this new petition presents
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the
petitioned actions may be warranted.
Accordingly, we are initiating a status
review of these five rockfish species. To
ensure that the status review is
complete and based upon the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we are soliciting
information regarding the population
structure and status of these rockfish
species.
DATES: Information and comments on
the subject action must be received by
May 16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the code 0648–XF89,
addressed to: Chief, NMFS, Protected
Resources Division, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic comments via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov
• Facsimile (fax): 503–231–5441
• Mail: 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard,
Suite 1100, Portland, Oregon, 97232.
• Hand delivery: You may handdeliver written comments to our office
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 52 (Monday, March 17, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14193-14195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-5326]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 181
[Docket No. USCG-2007-29236]
Hull Identification Numbers for Recreational Vessels
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces it is again requesting comments on
the costs and benefits of expanding the existing 12-character Hull
Identification Number (HIN) in order to provide additional information
identifying vessels. The Coast Guard requests public comments on this
issue and on the specific questions in this Notice.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Docket Management
Facility on or before June 16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2007-29236 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
(1) Online: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground Floor of the West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202-366-9329.
(4) Fax: 202-493-2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call Philip Cappel, Office of Boating Safety, Recreational Boating
Product Assurance Division, Coast Guard, telephone 202-372-1076. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to submit comments and related material on this
notice. All comments received will be posted, without change, to http:/
/www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation
(DOT) to use the Docket Management Facility. Please see DOT's ``Privacy
Act'' paragraph below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
docket
[[Page 14194]]
number for this notice (USCG-2007-29236), and give the reason for each
comment. You may submit your comments and material by electronic means,
mail, fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address
under ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only
one means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your
submission. For example, we may ask you to resubmit your comment if we
are not be able to read your original submission. If you submit them by
mail or delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/
2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached the
Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period.
Viewing the comments: To view the comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time, click on ``Search for Dockets,'' and
enter the docket number for this notice (USCG-2007-29236) in the Docket
ID box, and click enter. You may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit
https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Background and Purpose
The existing Hull Identification Number (HIN) is a unique 12-
character serial number required on each recreational vessel
manufactured in or imported into the United States for the purposes of
sale. The Coast Guard assigns the first three characters, a
Manufacturer Identification Code (MIC), which identifies the
manufacturer or importer; characters four through eight are a
manufacturer serial number; characters nine and ten indicate date of
certification for vessels subject to safety standards or the date of
manufacture for vessels not subject to standards; and characters eleven
and twelve indicate the model year.
The proposed expanded HIN would consist of five additional
characters. Four of the additional characters would indicate length,
hull material, principal means of propulsion, and vessel type. The
fifth additional character would be a check digit. The expanded HIN
with its check digit would reflect additional information useful to law
enforcement authorities, marine bankers, marine insurers, boating
accident data analysts, and marine investigators, and also provide a
useful means of identifying vessels in the Vessel Identification System
(VIS). The VIS is only applicable to recreational vessels that are
registered by a State (see 33 CFR 187.3).
The Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security is required to
establish the VIS (46 U.S.C. chapters 125, 131 & 313) for use by the
public and law enforcement officials. The Secretary has delegated to
the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, the authority to implement VIS. VIS
will provide a nationwide pool of vessel and vessel owner information
that will help in the identification and recovery of stolen vessels,
deter vessel theft, and will aid in homeland security.
Regulatory History
We published a Request for Comments in the Federal Register on
November 16, 1998 (63 FR 63638), soliciting comments on: (1) The
expected benefits of an expanded HIN with vessel-specific characters
and a check digit; (2) the manner in which the Coast Guard should
exempt small entities and the builders of high-volume, low-cost
vessels, such as canoes, kayaks, and inflatables; and (3) the estimated
burdens and costs to boat manufacturers if the HIN regulations were
revised to require vessel-specific characters and a check digit. The
comment period closed on February 16, 1999.
We received 31 comments, only one of which contained any economic
data that could be used to determine the benefits of a requirement for
an expanded HIN containing vessel-specific characters and a check
digit. Only four comments were in favor of allowing exceptions for
small entities and the builders of high-volume, low-cost vessels, such
as canoes, kayaks, and inflatable boats. None of the comments contained
information about the estimated burdens and costs to boat
manufacturers.
Discussion
States, bankers, insurers, and theft and accident investigators
favor an expanded format. With vessel-specific characters and a check
digit it would deter both vessel theft and the alteration of HIN's for
fraudulent purposes and could allow for more in-depth analysis of
accident data. In addition, there are other people who favor the
existing 12-character HIN format.
A rulemaking to increase the number of characters in the HIN to
include vessel-specific information could aid in the recovery of stolen
vessels, reduce fraud, improve the accuracy of accident data analysis,
and help in the remote identification of a ``suspect'' vessel. In
addition there may be other benefits associated with expanding the
existing 12-character HIN to include certain vessel-specific
information.
Investigations of lost and stolen vessels depend, in large part, on
the proper authorities' ability to identify a vessel. The proposed
regulations would aid in this pursuit by expanding the current 12-
character HIN to include detailed information about each vessel.
In addition, a check digit in the expanded HIN would make
alteration of an HIN more difficult thereby helping to prevent fraud in
the sale of vessels.
Boating accident statistics are compiled annually by the Coast
Guard from data received from the States and territories through the
Boating Accident Report Database (BARD). These statistics are analyzed
to, among other uses, determine the different causes of accidents and
what course(s) of action, if any, may be taken by the Boating Safety
Program to reduce the number of accidents. The accident analyses,
however, have been hindered by the lack of specific descriptive
information regarding the vessels involved in the accidents and/or the
inaccuracy of the vessel descriptive data provided in the BARD system.
Boating accident reports are submitted by the owner/operator of the
vessel or, in the case of serious accidents, by an investigating
officer. Since the accident information is being provided by thousands
of different individuals the reports may not always be accurate as to
the exact description of the vessel, which leads to inaccuracies in the
analyses of the accident database. A 17-character HIN with the
additional descriptors built into the HIN is expected to improve both
the scope and the accuracy of the data analyses.
Adding vessel description information to the HIN could also improve
the personal safety of State water patrol officers by enabling them,
prior to boarding a vessel, through the use of computer lookup of the
vessel registration number, to get an accurate description of the
vessel via the HIN
[[Page 14195]]
and alert them to approach with caution if the description does not
match the vessel they are planning to board.
However, the Coast Guard lacks detailed information about the
anticipated costs and benefits of the expanded HIN format. Also, we
still believe that, if an expanded HIN format, consisting of vessel-
specific characters and a check digit, is adopted, the Coast Guard
should be allowed to except manufacturers that are small business
entities, and manufacturers of high-volume, low-cost vessels to
minimize costs and information collection burdens.
Federal agencies with regulatory programs are subject to
regulations implementing the Paperwork Reduction Act which are enforced
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The intent of the Act is
to ensure that the Federal Government imposes only the minimum burden
on the public in collecting information and requiring the maintenance
of records, and that the information collected or maintained is
necessary and useful. A regulation requiring manufacturers to display
labels, such as HIN's, is an example of a collection of information
requirement.
The Coast Guard encourages you to comment on: (1) The expected
benefits and costs of an expanded Hull Identification Number with
vessel-specific characters and a check digit; (2) the manner in which
the Coast Guard should except small entities and the builders of high-
volume, low-cost vessels, such as canoes, kayaks, and inflatables; (3)
the estimated collection of information burdens to boat manufacturers
if the current 12-character HIN regulation were revised to require
additional vessel-specific characters and a check digit; and (4)
possible alternatives to an expanded HIN.
Data is needed to support a decision-making process. Therefore we
particularly need your help in answering any of the following questions
(please provide arguments or data to support each answer):
1. What are the expected benefits if the HIN on a vessel included
vessel-specific characters (e.g. vessel length, hull material, means of
propulsion, boat type, and check digit)?
2. What are the estimated numbers of thefts that might be
prevented?
3. What are the estimated numbers of additional lost or stolen
vessels that might be recovered?
4. What is the estimated value of insurance company losses that
might be prevented?
5. What are the estimated numbers of fraud attempts that might be
prevented?
6. What are the estimated reductions in investigatory expenditures?
7. What are the expected benefits from improved accident data
analyses?
8. How long will it take and what will it cost to determine a 17-
character HIN?
9. How long will it take and what will it cost to affix a 17-
character HIN to the hull of a vessel?
10. What are the measurable resources such as labor and capital
that you would include in a cost-benefit analysis of a 17-character HIN
implementation?
11. Should the Coast Guard consider excepting all builders of non-
powered vessels?
12. Should the Coast Guard consider excepting manufacturers of
boats that sell for less than a certain dollar value?
13. What alternatives are available that would reduce adverse
impacts on small entities and builders of high-volume, low-cost
vessels?
14. Should the Coast Guard consider a phase-in period for
compliance with a 17-character HIN regulation? What time frame would be
appropriate?
15. What are effective alternatives to a 17-character HIN? Examples
could include the following:
a. Leave the current 12-character HIN as is.
b. Implement the Vessel Identification System in lieu of
implementing a 17-character HIN.
c. Develop a regulation requiring uniform State titling/
registration policies.
d. Develop a regulation requiring a uniform method to affix the HIN
that would reduce the likelihood of tampering.
e. Increase security around shore and harbor facilities (more
officers, tracking/monitoring devices).
f. Require other security measures during vessel construction, such
as barcode HINs, radio frequency identification tags, etc.
Dated: March 7, 2008.
James A. Watson,
Rear Admiral (Lower Half), U.S. Coast Guard, Director of Prevention
Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-5326 Filed 3-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P