Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 14218-14220 [E8-5302]
Download as PDF
14218
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 52 / Monday, March 17, 2008 / Notices
PCRBs: (1) in surrogate financial ratios
we included ‘‘rates and taxes’’ in the
SG&A calculation, (2) material costs
were adjusted for changes in raw
material inventories, (3) the appropriate
profit amount was used and (4) we
revised the calculation of the total value
of direct materials to include the value
of upper polyvinylchloride (‘‘PVC’’)
inputs.
rate of 77.57 percent; (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not received their own rate, the
cash-deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Final Results of the Review
The Department has determined that
the following preliminary dumping
margins exist for the period August 1,
2005, through July 31, 2006:
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation that
is subject to sanction.
This administrative review and this
notice are in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, 19 CFR
351.213, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
POLYETHYLENE RETAIL CARRIER BAGS
FROM THE PRC
Manufacturer/Exporter
Weighted-Average
Margin (Percent)
Chun Hing Plastic Packaging Mfy. Ltd. and
Chun Yip Plastic Bag
Factory ......................
Dongguan Nozawa
Plastics Products Co.,
Ltd. and United
Power Packaging,
Ltd. ............................
Rally Plastics Co., Ltd.
17.30
2.58
32.02
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 15 days
after the date of publication of these
final results of review. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have
calculated importer or customer-specific
assessment rates for merchandise
subject to this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of the
administrative review for shipments of
the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for
subject merchandise exported by Chun
Hing, Nozawa, and Rally, the cashdeposit rate will be that established in
the final results of review (except, if the
rate is zero or de minimis, no cash
deposit will be required); (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above that have
separate rates, the cash-deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
for all other PRC exporters of subject
merchandise, which have not been
found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash-deposit rate will be PRC-wide
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
Notification to Importers
Dated: March 10, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
APPENDIX
List of Comments and Issues in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum
Comments with Respect to Surrogate
Financial Ratios
Comment 1: Offset of Selling, General,
and Administrative (‘‘SG&A’’) by
Interest Income
Comment 2: ‘‘Rates and Taxes’’ in the
SG&A Calculation
Comment 3: Adjustment to Material
Costs by the Amount of Changes in Raw
Material and Work-In-Progress
Inventories
Comment 4: Correction to the Profit
Amount
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments with Respect to Nozawa
Comment 5: Cash Deposit and
Liquidation Instructions
Comments with Respect to Rally
Comment 6: Appropriate Surrogate
Value for Ink
Comment 7: Valuation of Recycled
Scrap and Scrap By-Product
Comment 8: Revised Allocation
Methodology
[FR Doc. E8–5300 Filed 3–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–580–851]
Dynamic Random Access Memory
Semiconductors from the Republic of
Korea: Final Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 10, 2007, the
Department of Commerce published in
the Federal Register its preliminary
results of administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on dynamic
random access memory semiconductors
from the Republic of Korea for the
period January 1, 2005, through
December 31, 2005.
Following the preliminary results, we
conducted verification and provided
interested parties with an opportunity to
comment on the preliminary results and
our verification findings. Based on
information received since the
preliminary results and our analysis of
the comments received, the Department
has revised the net subsidy rate for
Hynix. The final net subsidy rate for
Hynix is listed below in the section
entitled ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 17, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Neubacher or Shane Subler, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5823 or (202) 482–
0189, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The following events have occurred
since the publication of the preliminary
results of this review. See Dynamic
Random Access Memory
Semiconductors from the Republic of
Korea: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 52 / Monday, March 17, 2008 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Review, 72 FR 51609 (September 10,
2007) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
From November 9 to November 14,
2007, we conducted verification of the
questionnaire responses submitted by
the Government of Korea (‘‘GOK’’) and
Hynix Semiconductor Inc. (‘‘Hynix’’),
the only company covered in this
review. On December 28, 2007, we
received a hearing request from the GOK
and Hynix. On January 18, 2008, we
received a hearing request from the
petitioner, Micron Technology, Inc.
(‘‘Micron’’). On January 30, 2008,
Micron also requested a closed hearing
to discuss one of the issues it raised in
its case brief. On January 30, 2008, we
received a case brief from Micron and a
joint case brief from Hynix and the
GOK. We received rebuttal briefs from
Hynix and the GOK, Micron, and
Qimonda North America, a domestic
interested party, on February 6, 2008. A
hearing was held at the Department on
February 12, 2008. The hearing
comprised both a public session and a
closed session.
On October 2, 2007, we extended the
time limit for the final results of this
administrative review by 60 days (to
March 10, 2008), pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’). See Dynamic
Random Access Memory
Semiconductors from the Republic of
Korea: Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 72 FR 56052
(October 2, 2007).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are dynamic random access memory
semiconductors (‘‘DRAMS’’) from the
Republic of Korea (‘‘ROK’’), whether
assembled or unassembled. Assembled
DRAMS include all package types.
Unassembled DRAMS include
processed wafers, uncut die, and cut
die. Processed wafers fabricated in the
ROK, but assembled into finished
semiconductors outside the ROK are
also included in the scope. Processed
wafers fabricated outside the ROK and
assembled into finished semiconductors
in the ROK are not included in the
scope.
The scope of this order additionally
includes memory modules containing
DRAMS from the ROK. A memory
module is a collection of DRAMS, the
sole function of which is memory.
Memory modules include single in–line
processing modules, single in–line
memory modules, dual in–line memory
modules, small outline dual in–line
memory modules, Rambus in–line
memory modules, and memory cards or
other collections of DRAMS, whether
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
unmounted or mounted on a circuit
board. Modules that contain other parts
that are needed to support the function
of memory are covered. Only those
modules that contain additional items
which alter the function of the module
to something other than memory, such
as video graphics adapter boards and
cards, are not included in the scope.
This order also covers future DRAMS
module types.
The scope of this order additionally
includes, but is not limited to, video
random access memory and
synchronous graphics random access
memory, as well as various types of
DRAMS, including fast page–mode,
extended data–out, burst extended data–
out, synchronous dynamic RAM,
Rambus DRAM, and Double Data Rate
DRAM. The scope also includes any
future density, packaging, or assembling
of DRAMS. Also included in the scope
of this order are removable memory
modules placed on motherboards, with
or without a central processing unit,
unless the importer of the motherboards
certifies with CBP that neither it, nor a
party related to it or under contract to
it, will remove the modules from the
motherboards after importation. The
scope of this order does not include
DRAMS or memory modules that are re–
imported for repair or replacement.
The DRAMS subject to this order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
8542.21.8005, 8542.21.8020 through
8542.21.8030, and 8542.32.0001 through
8542.32.0023 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). The memory modules
containing DRAMS from the ROK,
described above, are currently
classifiable under subheadings
8473.30.1040, 8473.30.1080,
8473.30.1140, and 8473.30.1180 of the
HTSUS. Removable memory modules
placed on motherboards are classifiable
under subheadings 8443.99.2500,
8443.99.2550, 8471.50.0085,
8471.50.0150, 8517.30.5000,
8517.50.1000, 8517.50.5000,
8517.50.9000, 8517.61.0000,
8517.62.0010, 8517.62.0050,
8517.69.0000, 8517.70.0000,
8517.90.3400, 8517.90.3600,
8517.90.3800, 8517.90.4400,
8542.21.8005, 8542.21.8020,
8542.21.8021, 8542.21.8022,
8542.21.8023, 8542.21.8024,
8542.21.8025, 8542.21.8026,
8542.21.8027, 8542.21.8028,
8542.21.8029, 8542.21.8030,
8542.31.0000, 8542.33.0000,
8542.39.0000, 8543.89.9300, and
8543.89.9600 of the HTSUS. However,
the product description, and not the
HTSUS classification, is dispositive of
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14219
whether merchandise imported into the
United States falls within the scope.
Scope Rulings
On December 29, 2004, the
Department received a request from
Cisco Systems, Inc. (‘‘Cisco’’), to
determine whether removable memory
modules placed on motherboards that
are imported for repair or refurbishment
are within the scope of the CVD Order.
See Notice of Countervailing Duty
Order: Dynamic Random Access
Memory Semiconductors from the
Republic of Korea, 68 FR 47546 (August
11, 2003) (‘‘CVD Order’’). The
Department initiated a scope inquiry
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.225(e) on
February 4, 2005. On January 12, 2006,
the Department issued a final scope
ruling, finding that removable memory
modules placed on motherboards that
are imported for repair or refurbishment
are not within the scope of the CVD
Order provided that the importer
certifies that it will destroy any memory
modules that are removed for repair or
refurbishment. See Memorandum from
Stephen J. Claeys to David M. Spooner,
regarding Final Scope Ruling,
Countervailing Duty Order on DRAMs
from the Republic of Korea (January 12,
2006).
Period of Review
The period for which we are
measuring subsidies, i.e., the period of
review (‘‘POR’’), is January 1, 2005,
through December 31, 2005.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in
the March 10, 2008, Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results in
the Third Administrative Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order on Dynamic
Random Access Memory
Semiconductors from the Republic of
Korea (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’) from
Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, to
David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration, which is
hereby adopted by this notice. Attached
to this notice as an appendix is a list of
the issues which parties have raised and
to which we have responded in the
Decision Memorandum. Parties can find
a complete discussion of all issues
raised in this review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum, which is on file in
the Department’s Central Records Unit,
Room 1117 of the main Department
building. In addition, a complete
version of the public Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
14220
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 52 / Monday, March 17, 2008 / Notices
on the Internet at https://
www.ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Dated: March 10, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Final Results of Review
Appendix I
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5), we calculated an
individual subsidy rate for the
producer/exporter, Hynix. For the
period January 1, 2005, through
December 31, 2005, we find that the ad
valorem net subsidy rate for Hynix is
23.78 percent.
Comments in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
Comment 1: Timing of the Benefit on a
Previously Countervailed Debt–toEquity Swap (‘‘DES’’)
Comment 2: Allegation that Hynix is
Circumventing the Order
Comment 3: Application of Adverse
Facts Available (‘‘AFA’’) for Undiscosed
Grant Presented at Verification
Comment 4: Whether Deposit Rate
Should Be Adjusted to Provide a
Reasonable Estimate of Future CVD
Liability
Assessment Rates
Fifteen days after the date of
publication of these final results of this
review, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate shipments of DRAMS
by Hynix entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption from
January 1, 2005, through December 31,
2005, at 23.78 percent ad valorem of the
F.O.B. invoice price.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Cash Deposits
The Department also intends to
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at 23.78
percent ad valorem of the entered value
on all shipments of the subject
merchandise from Hynix, entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review.
We will instruct CBP to continue to
collect cash deposits for non–reviewed
companies at the most recent company–
specific rate applicable to the company.
The Department has previously
excluded Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
from this order. See Notice of Amended
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination: Dynamic Random
Access Memory Semiconductors from
the Republic of Korea, 68 FR 44290 (July
28, 2003). Thus, the ‘‘all others’’ rate
shall apply to all non–reviewed
companies until a review of a company
assigned this rate is requested.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice
are issued and published in accordance
with section 751(a)(1) of the Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
[FR Doc. E8–5302 Filed 3–14–08; 8:45 am]
manufacturers/exporters of the subject
merchandise: Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.
(Dongbu); Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO);
and Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
(Union) (collectively, respondents). The
period of review (POR) is August 1,
2005, through July 31, 2006.
As a result of our analysis of the
comments received, these final results
differ from the Preliminary Results. For
our final results, we have found that
during the POR, HYSCO, Dongbu and
Union sold subject merchandise at less
than normal value (NV).
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 17, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Hargett (HYSCO), Cindy
Robinson (Dongbu), Victoria Cho (the
POSCO Group), and Jolanta Lawska
(Union), AD/CVD Operations, Office 3,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4161,
(202) 482–3797, (202) 482–5075, and
(202) 482–8362, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Background
Comment 5: Whether There Are Errors
that Lead to Double and Triple Counting
of Benefits of Principalized Interest
Loans
Comment 6: Whether the Import Duty
Reduction Program is Specific to Hynix
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–816]
Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products from the Republic
of Korea: Notice of Final Results of the
Thirteenth Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 10, 2007, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the antidumping duty
administrative review for certain
corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat
products (CORE) from the Republic of
Korea (Korea). See Certain Corrosion–
Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products
from the Republic of Korea: Notice of
Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 72 FR 51584
(September 10, 2007) (Preliminary
Results). This review covers three1
AGENCY:
1 Pohang
Iron & Steel Company, Ltd. (POSCO)
and Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd. (POCOS)
(collectively, the POSCO Group) were originally
included as a respondent in the instant review;
however, the Department rescinded this review
with respect to the POSCO Group. See Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from
the Republic of Korea: Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative, 72 FR 58286
(October 15, 2007) (POSCO Rescission).
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On September 10, 2007, the
Department published the Preliminary
Results. On October 26, 2007, the
Department published the notice of
extension of final results of the
antidumping administrative review of
CORE from Korea, extending the date
for these final results to March 10, 2008.
See Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel
Flat Products From Korea: Extension of
Time Limits for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 72 FR 60799 (October 26, 2007).
Comments from Interested Parties
We invited parties to comment on our
Preliminary Results. On January 22,
2008, ArcelorMittal Steel Inc. (Mittal),
United States Steel Corporation (US
Steel), and Nucor Corporation (Nucor)
filed case briefs concerning all of the
respondents and each of the
respondents filed a case brief. On
January 28, 2008, Mittal, US Steel, and
Nucor each filed a rebuttal brief
concerning all of the respondents. On
January 28, 2008, each of the
respondents filed a rebuttal brief.
Scope of the Order
This order covers cold–rolled (cold–
reduced) carbon steel flat–rolled carbon
steel products, of rectangular shape,
either clad, plated, or coated with
corrosion–resistant metals such as zinc,
aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickelor iron–based alloys, whether or not
corrugated or painted, varnished or
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 52 (Monday, March 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14218-14220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-5302]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-580-851]
Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors from the Republic of
Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 10, 2007, the Department of Commerce published in
the Federal Register its preliminary results of administrative review
of the countervailing duty order on dynamic random access memory
semiconductors from the Republic of Korea for the period January 1,
2005, through December 31, 2005.
Following the preliminary results, we conducted verification and
provided interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results and our verification findings. Based on information
received since the preliminary results and our analysis of the comments
received, the Department has revised the net subsidy rate for Hynix.
The final net subsidy rate for Hynix is listed below in the section
entitled ``Final Results of Review.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 17, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Neubacher or Shane Subler, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-5823 or (202) 482-0189, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The following events have occurred since the publication of the
preliminary results of this review. See Dynamic Random Access Memory
Semiconductors from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
[[Page 14219]]
Review, 72 FR 51609 (September 10, 2007) (``Preliminary Results'').
From November 9 to November 14, 2007, we conducted verification of
the questionnaire responses submitted by the Government of Korea
(``GOK'') and Hynix Semiconductor Inc. (``Hynix''), the only company
covered in this review. On December 28, 2007, we received a hearing
request from the GOK and Hynix. On January 18, 2008, we received a
hearing request from the petitioner, Micron Technology, Inc.
(``Micron''). On January 30, 2008, Micron also requested a closed
hearing to discuss one of the issues it raised in its case brief. On
January 30, 2008, we received a case brief from Micron and a joint case
brief from Hynix and the GOK. We received rebuttal briefs from Hynix
and the GOK, Micron, and Qimonda North America, a domestic interested
party, on February 6, 2008. A hearing was held at the Department on
February 12, 2008. The hearing comprised both a public session and a
closed session.
On October 2, 2007, we extended the time limit for the final
results of this administrative review by 60 days (to March 10, 2008),
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(``the Act''). See Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors from the
Republic of Korea: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 56052 (October 2,
2007).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are dynamic random access memory
semiconductors (``DRAMS'') from the Republic of Korea (``ROK''),
whether assembled or unassembled. Assembled DRAMS include all package
types. Unassembled DRAMS include processed wafers, uncut die, and cut
die. Processed wafers fabricated in the ROK, but assembled into
finished semiconductors outside the ROK are also included in the scope.
Processed wafers fabricated outside the ROK and assembled into finished
semiconductors in the ROK are not included in the scope.
The scope of this order additionally includes memory modules
containing DRAMS from the ROK. A memory module is a collection of
DRAMS, the sole function of which is memory. Memory modules include
single in-line processing modules, single in-line memory modules, dual
in-line memory modules, small outline dual in-line memory modules,
Rambus in-line memory modules, and memory cards or other collections of
DRAMS, whether unmounted or mounted on a circuit board. Modules that
contain other parts that are needed to support the function of memory
are covered. Only those modules that contain additional items which
alter the function of the module to something other than memory, such
as video graphics adapter boards and cards, are not included in the
scope. This order also covers future DRAMS module types.
The scope of this order additionally includes, but is not limited
to, video random access memory and synchronous graphics random access
memory, as well as various types of DRAMS, including fast page-mode,
extended data-out, burst extended data-out, synchronous dynamic RAM,
Rambus DRAM, and Double Data Rate DRAM. The scope also includes any
future density, packaging, or assembling of DRAMS. Also included in the
scope of this order are removable memory modules placed on
motherboards, with or without a central processing unit, unless the
importer of the motherboards certifies with CBP that neither it, nor a
party related to it or under contract to it, will remove the modules
from the motherboards after importation. The scope of this order does
not include DRAMS or memory modules that are re-imported for repair or
replacement.
The DRAMS subject to this order are currently classifiable under
subheadings 8542.21.8005, 8542.21.8020 through 8542.21.8030, and
8542.32.0001 through 8542.32.0023 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (``HTSUS''). The memory modules containing DRAMS from
the ROK, described above, are currently classifiable under subheadings
8473.30.1040, 8473.30.1080, 8473.30.1140, and 8473.30.1180 of the
HTSUS. Removable memory modules placed on motherboards are classifiable
under subheadings 8443.99.2500, 8443.99.2550, 8471.50.0085,
8471.50.0150, 8517.30.5000, 8517.50.1000, 8517.50.5000, 8517.50.9000,
8517.61.0000, 8517.62.0010, 8517.62.0050, 8517.69.0000, 8517.70.0000,
8517.90.3400, 8517.90.3600, 8517.90.3800, 8517.90.4400, 8542.21.8005,
8542.21.8020, 8542.21.8021, 8542.21.8022, 8542.21.8023, 8542.21.8024,
8542.21.8025, 8542.21.8026, 8542.21.8027, 8542.21.8028, 8542.21.8029,
8542.21.8030, 8542.31.0000, 8542.33.0000, 8542.39.0000, 8543.89.9300,
and 8543.89.9600 of the HTSUS. However, the product description, and
not the HTSUS classification, is dispositive of whether merchandise
imported into the United States falls within the scope.
Scope Rulings
On December 29, 2004, the Department received a request from Cisco
Systems, Inc. (``Cisco''), to determine whether removable memory
modules placed on motherboards that are imported for repair or
refurbishment are within the scope of the CVD Order. See Notice of
Countervailing Duty Order: Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors
from the Republic of Korea, 68 FR 47546 (August 11, 2003) (``CVD
Order''). The Department initiated a scope inquiry pursuant to 19 CFR
351.225(e) on February 4, 2005. On January 12, 2006, the Department
issued a final scope ruling, finding that removable memory modules
placed on motherboards that are imported for repair or refurbishment
are not within the scope of the CVD Order provided that the importer
certifies that it will destroy any memory modules that are removed for
repair or refurbishment. See Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys to David
M. Spooner, regarding Final Scope Ruling, Countervailing Duty Order on
DRAMs from the Republic of Korea (January 12, 2006).
Period of Review
The period for which we are measuring subsidies, i.e., the period
of review (``POR''), is January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2005.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this administrative review are addressed in the March 10, 2008, Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results in the Third
Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Dynamic
Random Access Memory Semiconductors from the Republic of Korea
(``Decision Memorandum'') from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. Attached to this notice as an appendix is a list of the issues
which parties have raised and to which we have responded in the
Decision Memorandum. Parties can find a complete discussion of all
issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum, which is on file in the Department's Central
Records Unit, Room 1117 of the main Department building. In addition, a
complete version of the public Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly
[[Page 14220]]
on the Internet at https://www.ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we calculated an
individual subsidy rate for the producer/exporter, Hynix. For the
period January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2005, we find that the ad
valorem net subsidy rate for Hynix is 23.78 percent.
Assessment Rates
Fifteen days after the date of publication of these final results
of this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate shipments
of DRAMS by Hynix entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption
from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2005, at 23.78 percent ad
valorem of the F.O.B. invoice price.
Cash Deposits
The Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash
deposits of estimated countervailing duties at 23.78 percent ad valorem
of the entered value on all shipments of the subject merchandise from
Hynix, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the final results of this
administrative review.
We will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits for non-
reviewed companies at the most recent company-specific rate applicable
to the company. The Department has previously excluded Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. from this order. See Notice of Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Dynamic Random Access
Memory Semiconductors from the Republic of Korea, 68 FR 44290 (July 28,
2003). Thus, the ``all others'' rate shall apply to all non-reviewed
companies until a review of a company assigned this rate is requested.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice are issued and published in
accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 10, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I
Comments in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Timing of the Benefit on a Previously Countervailed Debt-to-
Equity Swap (``DES'')
Comment 2: Allegation that Hynix is Circumventing the Order
Comment 3: Application of Adverse Facts Available (``AFA'') for
Undiscosed Grant Presented at Verification
Comment 4: Whether Deposit Rate Should Be Adjusted to Provide a
Reasonable Estimate of Future CVD Liability
Comment 5: Whether There Are Errors that Lead to Double and Triple
Counting of Benefits of Principalized Interest Loans
Comment 6: Whether the Import Duty Reduction Program is Specific to
Hynix
[FR Doc. E8-5302 Filed 3-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S