Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, et al; Notice of Application, 13049-13052 [E8-4684]

Download as PDF yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Notices current net asset value of the Account. The recapture of the New Credit does not involve either of the evils that Rule 22c–1 was intended to address, namely: (i) The dilution of the value of outstanding redeemable securities of registered investment companies through their sale at a price below net asset value or redemption or repurchase at a price above it, and (ii) other unfair results, including speculative trading practices. 6. Applicants also assert that the proposed recapture of the New Credit does not pose a threat of dilution. To effect a recapture of a New Credit, interests in an owner’s account will be redeemed at a price determined on the basis of the current net asset value. The amount recaptured will equal the amount of the New Credit that the Insurance Companies paid out of their general account assets. Although the owner will be entitled to retain any investment gain attributable to the New Credit, the amount of that gain will be determined on the basis of current net asset value. Therefore, no dilution will occur upon the recapture of the New Credit. 7. Applicants also submit that the second harm that Rule 22c–1 was designed to address, namely speculative trading practices calculated to take advantage of backward pricing, will not occur as a result of the recapture of the New Credit. Applicants submit that the provisions for recapture of the New Credit under the X Series Contract do not, and any such Future Contract provisions will not, violate Sections 2(a)(32) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act, and Rule 22c–1 thereunder, and that the relief requested is consistent with the exemptive relief provided under the 2006 Order and other Commission precedent. 8. Applicants submit that their request for an amended order that applies to any Account or any Future Account established by an Insurance Company in connection with the issuance of the X Series Contract and Future Contracts, and underwritten or distributed by PAD or other brokerdealers, is appropriate in the public interest. Such an order would promote competitiveness in the variable annuity market by eliminating the need to file redundant exemptive applications, thereby reducing administrative expenses and maximizing the efficient use of Applicants’ resources. Investors would not receive any benefit or additional protection by requiring Applicants to repeatedly seek exemptive relief that would present no issue under the Act that has not already been addressed in this application. Having VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:03 Mar 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 Applicants file additional applications would impair Applicants’ ability effectively to take advantage of business opportunities as they arise. 9. Applicants undertake that Future Contracts funded by the Accounts or by Future Accounts that seek to rely on the order issued pursuant to the application will be substantially similar to the X Series Contract in all material respects. Conclusion Applicants submit that their request for an amended order meets the standards set out in Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act and that an amended order should, therefore, be granted. For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority. Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–4685 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. IC–28179; File No. 812–13446] Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, et al; Notice of Application March 4, 2008. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’). ACTION: Notice of application for an amended order under section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘1940 Act’’) granting exemptions from the provisions of sections 2(a)(32), 22(c) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and Rule 22c–1 thereunder. AGENCY: Applicants: Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (‘‘PALAC’’), Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation Variable Account B (‘‘Account’’); and Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc. (‘‘PAD,’’ and collectively with PALAC, and the Account ‘‘Applicants’’). Summary of Application: Applicants seek an order amending an existing order under section 6(c) of the Act, exempting them from sections 2(a)(32), 22(c) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and Rule 22c–1 thereunder, to permit the recapture of credit amounts that differ from the credit amounts contemplated by the existing order, under certain specified circumstances. Filing Date: The application was filed on October 29, 2007 and amended on January 7, 2008. Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application will be PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13049 issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of the Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on March 31, 2008, and should be accompanied by proof of service on Applicants in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the requester’s interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the Secretary of the Commission. ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Applicants, c/o C. Christopher Sprague, Esq., The Prudential Insurance Company of America, 751 Broad Street, Newark, NJ 07102–2992. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally Samuel, Senior Counsel, or Joyce M. Pickholz, Branch Chief, Office of Insurance Products, Division of Investment Management, at (202) 551– 6795. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from the SEC’s Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549 (tel. (202) 551–8090). Applicants’ Representations: 1. In Investment Company Act Release Nos. 25373 (January 22, 2002) (notice of application) and 25423 (February 20, 2002) (order), the Commission granted an order (the ‘‘Order’’) that permits, under specified circumstances, the recapture of certain bonus payments under the XTRA Credit SIX variable annuity (the ‘‘Contract’’).1 In particular, the Order permits the recapture of a credit equal to 6% of the purchase payment amount for a purchase payment made during the first annuity year. Since February of 2006, Applicants have been granting a credit of 6.5% during the first annuity year, but recapturing that credit only to the extent permitted absent a Commission 1 The Order applies to the American Skandia XTra Credit FOUR annuity (which offers different credit amounts than XTra Credit SIX) as well as the American Skandia XTra Credit SIX annuity. The instant application seeks to amend the Order only with respect to the XTra Credit SIX annuity, and not with respect to the XTra Credit Four annuity. Also that PALAC offers a ‘‘private label’’ version of the Contract, called Optimum Plus that is sold through Linsco/Private Ledger Corp. Optimum Plus offers the same credits as XTRA Credit SIX. Thus, references to the ‘‘Contract’’ in this application are intended to include Optimum Plus. E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 11MRN1 yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES 13050 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Notices order (i.e., during the free look period, after adjusting for charges and any negative investment performance with respect to the credit amount). In this application, Applicants seek to recapture the full amount of the 6.5% credit (the ‘‘6.5% Credit’’) (a) if the Contract is returned during the free look period, (b) if the Credit was granted with respect to a purchase payment submitted within twelve months prior to death (except that PALAC will not recapture the 6.5% Credit to the extent that the death benefit is equal to the account value, but after the recovery of all or a portion of the credit, the death benefit would be equal to less than purchase payments minus proportional withdrawals) and (c) if the Credit was granted with respect to a purchase payment submitted within twelve months prior to the exercise of the medically-related surrender provision of the Contract. 2. Applicants seek an amended order pursuant to section 6(c) of the Act exempting them from sections 2(a)(32), 22(c) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and Rule 22c–1 thereunder to the extent necessary to permit PALAC to recapture this 6.5% Credit under the scenarios described above. Applicants request that the amended order sought herein apply to any separate account established in the future by PALAC (‘‘Future Account’’) to support a variable annuity contract offered by PALAC in the future that is substantially similar in all material respects to the Contract (the ‘‘Future Contracts’’) and to any Future Contracts. Applicants also request that the amended order extend to any FINRA member broker-dealer controlling, controlled by, or under common control with PALAC, whether existing or created in the future, that serves as a distributor or principal underwriter of the Contract offered through the Accounts or any Future Account (‘‘Broker-Dealers’’). Applicants also request that the amended order extend to any broker-dealers that are FINRAregistered and not affiliated with PALAC or the Broker-Dealers (the ‘‘Unaffiliated Broker-Dealers’’). Each Unaffiliated Broker-Dealer will have entered into a dealer agreement with PAD or an affiliate of PAD prior to offering the Contract. 3. The Contracts are flexible premium deferred variable annuity contracts that are registered on Form N–4. The minimum initial purchase payment is $10,000, and any additional purchase payment must be at least $100 (except for contract owners who participate in certain periodic purchase payment programs). The maximum issue age for the Contract is 75, meaning that (a) the VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:44 Mar 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 owner must be 75 or younger, or (b) for a Contract that is entity-owned, the annuitant must be 75 or younger. 4. There are various insurance features under the Contract and charges associated with those features. There is a mortality and expense risk charge equal to 0.50% annually, an administration charge equal to 0.15% annually, and a distribution charge equal to 1.00% annually that is applicable only in annuity years 1–10. There is a maintenance fee equal to the lesser of $35 or 2% of account value, which is assessed annually on the Contract’s anniversary date or upon surrender. PALAC imposes no fee with respect to the first 20 transfers in an annuity year, but after the 20th such transfer, currently imposes a fee of $10 per transfer ($15 maximum). There is a contingent deferred sales charge (‘‘CDSC’’) under the Contract, the amount of which is based on the number of years that have elapsed since the issue date of the annuity. For Contracts issued prior to November 20,2006, the CDSC begins at 9% in year one, and each year thereafter is equal, respectively, to 9%, 8.5%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, with no CDSC in years 11 and later. For Contracts issued on or after November 20, 2006, the CDSC begins at 9% in year one, and each year thereafter is equal, respectively, to 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, with no CDSC in years 11 and later. No CDSC is imposed on the portion of a withdrawal that can be taken as part of the free withdrawal feature of the Contract. The maximum free withdrawal amount available in each annuity year is equal to 10% of all purchase payments that are subject to a CDSC. Earnings are not subject to any CDSC, and thus are not considered part of the free withdrawal. No CDSC will be imposed in any situations where the 6.5% Credit is recaptured 5. A Contract owner may select one or more of several optional living benefits. The Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefit, which offers lifetime payments based on a guaranteed protected value, is subject to a charge of 0.50% per year of the average protected income value each year. The Lifetime Five Income Benefit (which allows the owner to withdraw a specified protected value through periodic withdrawals or as a series of payments for life) is subject to a charge of 0.60% annually of the average daily net assets in the subaccounts. The Contract also offers a variant of the Lifetime Five benefit (called ‘‘Spousal Lifetime Five’’) that, for a charge of 0.75% annually, guarantees income until the second-todie of two individuals married to each PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 other. There is yet another variant called Highest Daily Lifetime Five, under which the protected withdrawal value is based on a highest daily account value and which bears a charge of 0.60% annually. The Contract offers a guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit called the Guaranteed Return Option (‘‘GRO’’ and ‘‘GRO Plus’’) for which PALAC imposes a charge equal to 0.25% annually. Finally, the Contract offers a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit for a charge of 0.35% annually. 6. The Contract offers several optional death benefits, including the Enhanced Beneficiary Protection Death Benefit for a charge of 0.25% annually, the Highest Anniversary Value Death Benefit for a charge of 0.25% annually, a Combination 5% roll-up and Highest Anniversary Value Death Benefit for a charge of 0.50% annually, and a Highest Daily Value Death Benefit for a charge of 0.50% annually. Applicants may add other optional living and death benefits to the Contract in the future. In addition to the optional insurance features, the Contract offers several optional administrative features at no additional cost (e.g., auto rebalancing, systematic withdrawals). 7. The Contract offers both variable investment options and market value adjustment fixed interest rate options. At present, the Contract offers portfolios of Advanced Series Trust (formerly, American Skandia Trust), AIM Variable Insurance Funds, Evergreen Variable Annuity Trust, First Defined Portfolio Fund, Gartmore Variable Insurance Trust, ProFunds, the Prudential Series Fund, and Wells Fargo Variable Trust. Under the Contract, Applicants reserve the right to add new underlying funds and series, and to substitute new portfolios for existing portfolios (subject to Commission approval). 8. An owner choosing to annuitize under the Contract will have only fixed annuity options available. Those fixed annuity options include annuities offering payments for life, payments based on joint lives, payments for life with a certain period, and fixed payments for a certain period. The latest annuitization date is the first day of the month coinciding with, or immediately following the later of the annuitant’s 85th birthday or your fifth annuity anniversary. For contracts issued on or after November 20, 2006, the maximum annuity date is triggered by the later of the first of the owner or annuitant to reach age 95 and the fifth anniversary of the issue date of the Contract. 9. For Contracts sold prior to February 13, 2006, the credit for purchase payments made during the first annuity E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 11MRN1 yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Notices year is 6%, and is not proposed to be changed. For Contracts issued on or after February 13, 2006, the credit applicable to purchase payments made during the first year is 6.5%. Applicants seek an amended exemptive order to allow them to recapture the full amount of this 6.5% Credit under the scenarios identified in the following sentence with respect to Contracts issued on or after the date of the Commission’s order under this application. Specifically, Applicants will recapture the 6.5% Credit if (a) the Contract is surrendered during the free look period, or (b) the credit was applied within 12 months prior to death (except that PALAC will not recapture the credit to the extent that the death benefit is equal to the account value, but after the recovery of all or a portion of the credit, the death benefit would be equal to less than purchase payments minus proportional withdrawals), or (c) the credit was applied within 12 months prior to the surrender of the contract under the medically-related surrender provision of the Contract (e.g., if the owner is diagnosed with a ‘‘fatal illness’’ and chooses to invoke this contract provision on that basis). (The medicallyrelated surrender feature is not available in New York.) Applicants seek an amended order pursuant to section 6(c) from sections 2(a)(32), 22(c), and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and Rule 22c–1 thereunder to the extent necessary to permit the Insurance Company to recapture the 6.5% Credit described herein in the instances described in the preceding sentence. Applicants’ Legal Analysis: 1. Section 6(c) of the Act authorizes the Commission to exempt any person, security or transaction, or any class or classes of persons, securities or transactions, from the provisions of the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder if and to the extent that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. 2. Applicants request that the Commission, pursuant to section 6(c) of the Act, amend the Order to the extent necessary to permit the recapture of the 6.5% Credit under the circumstances described above. Applicants believe that the requested exemptions are appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. 3. Applicants submit that the recapture of the 6.5% Credit will not raise concerns under Sections 2(a)(32), VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:44 Mar 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 22(c) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the 1940 Act, and Rule 22c–1 thereunder for the same reasons given in support of the Order. The 6.5% Credit will be recaptured only if the owner (a) exercises his/her free look right, (b) dies within 12 months after receiving a 6.5% Credit or (c) makes a medically-related surrender within 12 months after receiving a 6.5% Credit. The amounts recaptured equal the 6.5% Credits provided by the Insurance Company from its own general account assets. 4. When PALAC recaptures the 6.5% Credit, it is merely retrieving its own assets, and the owner has not been deprived of a proportionate share of the Account’s assets, because his or her interest in the 6.5% Credit amount has not vested. With respect to 6.5% Credit recaptured upon the exercise of the freelook privilege, it would be unfair to allow an owner exercising that privilege to retain a 6.5% Credit amount under a Contract that has been returned for a refund after a period of only a few days. If PALAC could not recapture the 6.5% Credit during the free look period, individuals could purchase a Contract with no intention of retaining it, and simply return it for a quick profit. Applicants also note that the Contract owner is entitled to retain any investment gain attributable to the 6.5% Credit, even if the 6.5% Credit is ultimately recaptured. Furthermore, the recapture of 6.5% Credits if death or a medically-related surrender occurs within 12 months after the receipt of a Credit is designed to provide PALAC with a measure of protection against ‘‘anti-selection.’’ The risk here is that an owner, with full knowledge of impending death or serious illness, will make very large payments and thereby leave PALAC less time to recover the cost of the 6.5% Credit, to its financial detriment. 5. Applicants submit that the provisions for recapture of the 6.5% Credit under the Contract do not, and any such Future Contract provisions will not, violate sections 2(a)(32) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act, and Rule 22c–1 thereunder, and that the relief requested is consistent with the exemptive relief provided under the Order and other Commission precedent. 6. The recapture of the 6.5% Credit could be viewed as involving the redemption of redeemable securities for a price other than one based on the current net asset value of an Account. The recapture of the 6.5% Credit does not involve either of the evils that Rule 22c–1 was intended to address, namely: (a) The dilution of the value of outstanding redeemable securities of registered investment companies PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13051 through their sale at a price below net asset value or redemption or repurchase at a price above it, and (b) other unfair results, including speculative trading practices. Applicants assert that the proposed recapture of the 6.5% Credit does not pose a threat of dilution. To effect a recapture of a 6.5% Credit, interests in an owner’s account will be redeemed at a price determined on the basis of the current net asset value. The amount recaptured will equal the amount of the 6.5% Credit that the Insurance Company paid out of its general account assets. Although the owner will be entitled to retain any investment gain attributable to the 6.5% Credit, the amount of that gain will be determined on the basis of current net asset value. Therefore, no dilution will occur upon the recapture of the 6.5% Credit. Applicants also submit that the second harm that Rule 22c–1 was designed to address, namely speculative trading practices calculated to take advantage of backward pricing, will not occur as a result of the recapture of the 6.5% Credit. 7. Applicants submit that their request for an amended order that applies to any Account or any Future Account established by PALAC in connection with the issuance of Contracts and Future Contracts, and underwritten or distributed by PAD or other broker-dealers, is appropriate in the public interest. Such an order would promote competitiveness in the variable annuity market by eliminating the need to file redundant exemptive applications, thereby reducing administrative expenses and maximizing the efficient use of Applicants’ resources. Investors would not receive any benefit or additional protection by requiring Applicants to repeatedly seek exemptive relief that would present no issue under the Act that has not already been addressed in this application. Having Applicants file additional applications would impair Applicants’ ability effectively to take advantage of business opportunities as they arise. 8. Applicants undertake that Future Contracts funded by the Accounts or by Future Accounts that seek to rely on the order issued pursuant to the application will be substantially similar to the Contracts in all material respects. Conclusion Applicants submit that their request for an amended order meets the standards set out in section 6(c) of the 1940 Act and that an amended order should, therefore, be granted. E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 11MRN1 13052 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Notices For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority. Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–4684 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. IC–28184; 811–4193] RSI Retirement Trust; Notice of Application March 5, 2008. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’). ACTION: Notice of application for deregistration under section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’). AGENCY: Summary of Application: Applicant requests an order declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Filing Date: The application was filed on March 4, 2008. Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the SEC’s Secretary and serving applicant with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on March 25, 2008, and should be accompanied by proof of service on the applicant, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing request should state the nature of the writer’s interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons may request notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC’s Secretary. Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F St., NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Applicant, 150 East 42nd St., New York, NY 10017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane L. Titus, Paralegal Specialist, at (202)551–6810, or Mary Kay Frech, Branch Chief, at (202)551–6821 (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation). ADDRESSES: The following is a summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee at the SEC’s Public Reference Desk, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1520 (tel. 202–551–5850). yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:44 Mar 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 Applicant’s Representations and Legal Analysis Applicant is registered under the Act as an open-end management investment company. On December 27, 2007, applicant’s securityholders voted to approve a mandatory redemption of certain of applicant’s securityholders and deregistration under the Act. Applicant’s securities are currently owned by 45 persons. Applicant states that its outstanding securities are not currently and will not be beneficially owned by more than 100 persons and it is not now making and does not propose to make a public offering of its securities. Applicant states that it will continue to operate as a company excepted from the definition of investment company pursuant to section 3(c)(1) of the Act. Applicant requests an order under section 8(f) of the Act declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, pursuant to delegated authority. Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–4750 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. IC–28181; File No. 812–13423] CUNA Mutual Insurance Society, et al; Notice of Application March 4, 2008. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’). ACTION: Notice of application for an order under Section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘1940 Act’’) granting exemptions from the provisions of Sections 2(a)(32) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and Rule 22c–1 thereunder. AGENCY: Applicants: CUNA Mutual Insurance Society (‘‘Company’’), CUNA Mutual Variable Annuity Account (‘‘Variable Account’’) and CUNA Brokerage Services, Inc. (‘‘CUNA Brokerage’’). Summary of Application: Applicants seek an order under Section 6(c) of the Act, exempting them from Sections 2(a)(32) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and Rule 22c–1 thereunder, to permit, the recapture of credits previously applied to purchase payments of certain flexible premium deferred variable annuity contracts issued by the Company (the ‘‘Contracts’’) under the following circumstances: (1) If the Contract owner (‘‘Owner’’) returns the Contract during PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the right to examine period; or (2) within twelve (12) months of the annuitant’s death when the Company pays a death benefit. Applicants further request that the exemptive relief extend to: (1) any other variable annuity contracts that the Company may issue in the future (‘‘Future Contracts’’) that are substantially similar in all material respects to the Contracts, and are funded through the Variable Account or through other separate accounts of the Company (‘‘Future Accounts’’); and (2) any other broker-dealer, which is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) and which in the future may act as distributor of and/or principal underwriter for, the Contracts or Future Contracts offered through the Variable Account or Future Accounts (‘‘Future Underwriters’’). Filing Date: The application was filed on September 7, 2007 and amended and restated on February 5, 2008. Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of the Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on March 31, 2008, and should be accompanied by proof of service on Applicants in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the requester’s interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the Secretary of the Commission. ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Applicants, c/o Pamela M. Krill, Esq., CUNA Mutual Insurance Society, 5910 Mineral Point Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53705. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally Samuel, Senior Counsel, or Joyce M. Pickholz, Branch Chief, Office of Insurance Products, Division of Investment Management at 202–551– 6795. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from the SEC’s Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549 (tel. (202) 551–8090). Applicants’ Representations 1. The Company is a mutual life insurance company originally organized E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 11MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13049-13052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4684]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. IC-28179; File No. 812-13446]


Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, et al; Notice of 
Application

March 4, 2008.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice of application for an amended order under section 6(c) 
of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ``Act'' or 
``1940 Act'') granting exemptions from the provisions of sections 
2(a)(32), 22(c) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and Rule 22c-1 thereunder.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

     Applicants: Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation 
(``PALAC''), Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation Variable 
Account B (``Account''); and Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc. 
(``PAD,'' and collectively with PALAC, and the Account ``Applicants'').
     Summary of Application: Applicants seek an order amending an 
existing order under section 6(c) of the Act, exempting them from 
sections 2(a)(32), 22(c) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and Rule 22c-1 
thereunder, to permit the recapture of credit amounts that differ from 
the credit amounts contemplated by the existing order, under certain 
specified circumstances.
     Filing Date: The application was filed on October 29, 2007 and 
amended on January 7, 2008.
     Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the 
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. 
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of 
the Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, 
personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the 
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on March 31, 2008, and should be accompanied by 
proof of service on Applicants in the form of an affidavit or, for 
lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the 
nature of the requester's interest, the reason for the request, and the 
issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may 
request notification by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-
1090. Applicants, c/o C. Christopher Sprague, Esq., The Prudential 
Insurance Company of America, 751 Broad Street, Newark, NJ 07102-2992.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally Samuel, Senior Counsel, or Joyce 
M. Pickholz, Branch Chief, Office of Insurance Products, Division of 
Investment Management, at (202) 551-6795.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from 
the SEC's Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20549 (tel. (202) 551-8090).
     Applicants' Representations:
    1. In Investment Company Act Release Nos. 25373 (January 22, 2002) 
(notice of application) and 25423 (February 20, 2002) (order), the 
Commission granted an order (the ``Order'') that permits, under 
specified circumstances, the recapture of certain bonus payments under 
the XTRA Credit SIX variable annuity (the ``Contract'').\1\ In 
particular, the Order permits the recapture of a credit equal to 6% of 
the purchase payment amount for a purchase payment made during the 
first annuity year. Since February of 2006, Applicants have been 
granting a credit of 6.5% during the first annuity year, but 
recapturing that credit only to the extent permitted absent a 
Commission

[[Page 13050]]

order (i.e., during the free look period, after adjusting for charges 
and any negative investment performance with respect to the credit 
amount). In this application, Applicants seek to recapture the full 
amount of the 6.5% credit (the ``6.5% Credit'') (a) if the Contract is 
returned during the free look period, (b) if the Credit was granted 
with respect to a purchase payment submitted within twelve months prior 
to death (except that PALAC will not recapture the 6.5% Credit to the 
extent that the death benefit is equal to the account value, but after 
the recovery of all or a portion of the credit, the death benefit would 
be equal to less than purchase payments minus proportional withdrawals) 
and (c) if the Credit was granted with respect to a purchase payment 
submitted within twelve months prior to the exercise of the medically-
related surrender provision of the Contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Order applies to the American Skandia XTra Credit FOUR 
annuity (which offers different credit amounts than XTra Credit SIX) 
as well as the American Skandia XTra Credit SIX annuity. The instant 
application seeks to amend the Order only with respect to the XTra 
Credit SIX annuity, and not with respect to the XTra Credit Four 
annuity. Also that PALAC offers a ``private label'' version of the 
Contract, called Optimum Plus that is sold through Linsco/Private 
Ledger Corp. Optimum Plus offers the same credits as XTRA Credit 
SIX. Thus, references to the ``Contract'' in this application are 
intended to include Optimum Plus.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Applicants seek an amended order pursuant to section 6(c) of the 
Act exempting them from sections 2(a)(32), 22(c) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the 
Act and Rule 22c-1 thereunder to the extent necessary to permit PALAC 
to recapture this 6.5% Credit under the scenarios described above. 
Applicants request that the amended order sought herein apply to any 
separate account established in the future by PALAC (``Future 
Account'') to support a variable annuity contract offered by PALAC in 
the future that is substantially similar in all material respects to 
the Contract (the ``Future Contracts'') and to any Future Contracts. 
Applicants also request that the amended order extend to any FINRA 
member broker-dealer controlling, controlled by, or under common 
control with PALAC, whether existing or created in the future, that 
serves as a distributor or principal underwriter of the Contract 
offered through the Accounts or any Future Account (``Broker-
Dealers''). Applicants also request that the amended order extend to 
any broker-dealers that are FINRA-registered and not affiliated with 
PALAC or the Broker-Dealers (the ``Unaffiliated Broker-Dealers''). Each 
Unaffiliated Broker-Dealer will have entered into a dealer agreement 
with PAD or an affiliate of PAD prior to offering the Contract.
    3. The Contracts are flexible premium deferred variable annuity 
contracts that are registered on Form N-4. The minimum initial purchase 
payment is $10,000, and any additional purchase payment must be at 
least $100 (except for contract owners who participate in certain 
periodic purchase payment programs). The maximum issue age for the 
Contract is 75, meaning that (a) the owner must be 75 or younger, or 
(b) for a Contract that is entity-owned, the annuitant must be 75 or 
younger.
    4. There are various insurance features under the Contract and 
charges associated with those features. There is a mortality and 
expense risk charge equal to 0.50% annually, an administration charge 
equal to 0.15% annually, and a distribution charge equal to 1.00% 
annually that is applicable only in annuity years 1-10. There is a 
maintenance fee equal to the lesser of $35 or 2% of account value, 
which is assessed annually on the Contract's anniversary date or upon 
surrender. PALAC imposes no fee with respect to the first 20 transfers 
in an annuity year, but after the 20th such transfer, currently imposes 
a fee of $10 per transfer ($15 maximum). There is a contingent deferred 
sales charge (``CDSC'') under the Contract, the amount of which is 
based on the number of years that have elapsed since the issue date of 
the annuity. For Contracts issued prior to November 20,2006, the CDSC 
begins at 9% in year one, and each year thereafter is equal, 
respectively, to 9%, 8.5%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, with no CDSC in 
years 11 and later. For Contracts issued on or after November 20, 2006, 
the CDSC begins at 9% in year one, and each year thereafter is equal, 
respectively, to 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, with no CDSC in 
years 11 and later. No CDSC is imposed on the portion of a withdrawal 
that can be taken as part of the free withdrawal feature of the 
Contract. The maximum free withdrawal amount available in each annuity 
year is equal to 10% of all purchase payments that are subject to a 
CDSC. Earnings are not subject to any CDSC, and thus are not considered 
part of the free withdrawal. No CDSC will be imposed in any situations 
where the 6.5% Credit is recaptured
    5. A Contract owner may select one or more of several optional 
living benefits. The Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefit, which offers 
lifetime payments based on a guaranteed protected value, is subject to 
a charge of 0.50% per year of the average protected income value each 
year. The Lifetime Five Income Benefit (which allows the owner to 
withdraw a specified protected value through periodic withdrawals or as 
a series of payments for life) is subject to a charge of 0.60% annually 
of the average daily net assets in the sub-accounts. The Contract also 
offers a variant of the Lifetime Five benefit (called ``Spousal 
Lifetime Five'') that, for a charge of 0.75% annually, guarantees 
income until the second-to-die of two individuals married to each 
other. There is yet another variant called Highest Daily Lifetime Five, 
under which the protected withdrawal value is based on a highest daily 
account value and which bears a charge of 0.60% annually. The Contract 
offers a guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit called the Guaranteed 
Return Option (``GRO'' and ``GRO Plus'') for which PALAC imposes a 
charge equal to 0.25% annually. Finally, the Contract offers a 
guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit for a charge of 0.35% annually.
    6. The Contract offers several optional death benefits, including 
the Enhanced Beneficiary Protection Death Benefit for a charge of 0.25% 
annually, the Highest Anniversary Value Death Benefit for a charge of 
0.25% annually, a Combination 5% roll-up and Highest Anniversary Value 
Death Benefit for a charge of 0.50% annually, and a Highest Daily Value 
Death Benefit for a charge of 0.50% annually. Applicants may add other 
optional living and death benefits to the Contract in the future. In 
addition to the optional insurance features, the Contract offers 
several optional administrative features at no additional cost (e.g., 
auto rebalancing, systematic withdrawals).
    7. The Contract offers both variable investment options and market 
value adjustment fixed interest rate options. At present, the Contract 
offers portfolios of Advanced Series Trust (formerly, American Skandia 
Trust), AIM Variable Insurance Funds, Evergreen Variable Annuity Trust, 
First Defined Portfolio Fund, Gartmore Variable Insurance Trust, 
ProFunds, the Prudential Series Fund, and Wells Fargo Variable Trust. 
Under the Contract, Applicants reserve the right to add new underlying 
funds and series, and to substitute new portfolios for existing 
portfolios (subject to Commission approval).
    8. An owner choosing to annuitize under the Contract will have only 
fixed annuity options available. Those fixed annuity options include 
annuities offering payments for life, payments based on joint lives, 
payments for life with a certain period, and fixed payments for a 
certain period. The latest annuitization date is the first day of the 
month coinciding with, or immediately following the later of the 
annuitant's 85th birthday or your fifth annuity anniversary. For 
contracts issued on or after November 20, 2006, the maximum annuity 
date is triggered by the later of the first of the owner or annuitant 
to reach age 95 and the fifth anniversary of the issue date of the 
Contract.
    9. For Contracts sold prior to February 13, 2006, the credit for 
purchase payments made during the first annuity

[[Page 13051]]

year is 6%, and is not proposed to be changed. For Contracts issued on 
or after February 13, 2006, the credit applicable to purchase payments 
made during the first year is 6.5%. Applicants seek an amended 
exemptive order to allow them to recapture the full amount of this 6.5% 
Credit under the scenarios identified in the following sentence with 
respect to Contracts issued on or after the date of the Commission's 
order under this application. Specifically, Applicants will recapture 
the 6.5% Credit if (a) the Contract is surrendered during the free look 
period, or (b) the credit was applied within 12 months prior to death 
(except that PALAC will not recapture the credit to the extent that the 
death benefit is equal to the account value, but after the recovery of 
all or a portion of the credit, the death benefit would be equal to 
less than purchase payments minus proportional withdrawals), or (c) the 
credit was applied within 12 months prior to the surrender of the 
contract under the medically-related surrender provision of the 
Contract (e.g., if the owner is diagnosed with a ``fatal illness'' and 
chooses to invoke this contract provision on that basis). (The 
medically-related surrender feature is not available in New York.) 
Applicants seek an amended order pursuant to section 6(c) from sections 
2(a)(32), 22(c), and 27(i)(2)(A) of the Act and Rule 22c-1 thereunder 
to the extent necessary to permit the Insurance Company to recapture 
the 6.5% Credit described herein in the instances described in the 
preceding sentence.
     Applicants' Legal Analysis:
    1. Section 6(c) of the Act authorizes the Commission to exempt any 
person, security or transaction, or any class or classes of persons, 
securities or transactions, from the provisions of the Act and the 
rules promulgated thereunder if and to the extent that such exemption 
is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with 
the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the 
policy and provisions of the Act.
    2. Applicants request that the Commission, pursuant to section 6(c) 
of the Act, amend the Order to the extent necessary to permit the 
recapture of the 6.5% Credit under the circumstances described above. 
Applicants believe that the requested exemptions are appropriate in the 
public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the 
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
    3. Applicants submit that the recapture of the 6.5% Credit will not 
raise concerns under Sections 2(a)(32), 22(c) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the 
1940 Act, and Rule 22c-1 thereunder for the same reasons given in 
support of the Order. The 6.5% Credit will be recaptured only if the 
owner (a) exercises his/her free look right, (b) dies within 12 months 
after receiving a 6.5% Credit or (c) makes a medically-related 
surrender within 12 months after receiving a 6.5% Credit. The amounts 
recaptured equal the 6.5% Credits provided by the Insurance Company 
from its own general account assets.
    4. When PALAC recaptures the 6.5% Credit, it is merely retrieving 
its own assets, and the owner has not been deprived of a proportionate 
share of the Account's assets, because his or her interest in the 6.5% 
Credit amount has not vested. With respect to 6.5% Credit recaptured 
upon the exercise of the free-look privilege, it would be unfair to 
allow an owner exercising that privilege to retain a 6.5% Credit amount 
under a Contract that has been returned for a refund after a period of 
only a few days. If PALAC could not recapture the 6.5% Credit during 
the free look period, individuals could purchase a Contract with no 
intention of retaining it, and simply return it for a quick profit. 
Applicants also note that the Contract owner is entitled to retain any 
investment gain attributable to the 6.5% Credit, even if the 6.5% 
Credit is ultimately recaptured. Furthermore, the recapture of 6.5% 
Credits if death or a medically-related surrender occurs within 12 
months after the receipt of a Credit is designed to provide PALAC with 
a measure of protection against ``anti-selection.'' The risk here is 
that an owner, with full knowledge of impending death or serious 
illness, will make very large payments and thereby leave PALAC less 
time to recover the cost of the 6.5% Credit, to its financial 
detriment.
    5. Applicants submit that the provisions for recapture of the 6.5% 
Credit under the Contract do not, and any such Future Contract 
provisions will not, violate sections 2(a)(32) and 27(i)(2)(A) of the 
Act, and Rule 22c-1 thereunder, and that the relief requested is 
consistent with the exemptive relief provided under the Order and other 
Commission precedent.
    6. The recapture of the 6.5% Credit could be viewed as involving 
the redemption of redeemable securities for a price other than one 
based on the current net asset value of an Account. The recapture of 
the 6.5% Credit does not involve either of the evils that Rule 22c-1 
was intended to address, namely: (a) The dilution of the value of 
outstanding redeemable securities of registered investment companies 
through their sale at a price below net asset value or redemption or 
repurchase at a price above it, and (b) other unfair results, including 
speculative trading practices. Applicants assert that the proposed 
recapture of the 6.5% Credit does not pose a threat of dilution. To 
effect a recapture of a 6.5% Credit, interests in an owner's account 
will be redeemed at a price determined on the basis of the current net 
asset value. The amount recaptured will equal the amount of the 6.5% 
Credit that the Insurance Company paid out of its general account 
assets. Although the owner will be entitled to retain any investment 
gain attributable to the 6.5% Credit, the amount of that gain will be 
determined on the basis of current net asset value. Therefore, no 
dilution will occur upon the recapture of the 6.5% Credit. Applicants 
also submit that the second harm that Rule 22c-1 was designed to 
address, namely speculative trading practices calculated to take 
advantage of backward pricing, will not occur as a result of the 
recapture of the 6.5% Credit.
    7. Applicants submit that their request for an amended order that 
applies to any Account or any Future Account established by PALAC in 
connection with the issuance of Contracts and Future Contracts, and 
underwritten or distributed by PAD or other broker-dealers, is 
appropriate in the public interest. Such an order would promote 
competitiveness in the variable annuity market by eliminating the need 
to file redundant exemptive applications, thereby reducing 
administrative expenses and maximizing the efficient use of Applicants' 
resources. Investors would not receive any benefit or additional 
protection by requiring Applicants to repeatedly seek exemptive relief 
that would present no issue under the Act that has not already been 
addressed in this application. Having Applicants file additional 
applications would impair Applicants' ability effectively to take 
advantage of business opportunities as they arise.
    8. Applicants undertake that Future Contracts funded by the 
Accounts or by Future Accounts that seek to rely on the order issued 
pursuant to the application will be substantially similar to the 
Contracts in all material respects.

Conclusion

    Applicants submit that their request for an amended order meets the 
standards set out in section 6(c) of the 1940 Act and that an amended 
order should, therefore, be granted.


[[Page 13052]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
under delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-4684 Filed 3-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.