Continuing Information Collection Request for the Unemployment Insurance (UI) Facilitation of Claimant Reemployment; Comment Request, 13013-13015 [E8-4657]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of
March, 2008.
Bradford P. Campbell,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. E8–4658 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
March 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–4667 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Continuing Information Collection
Request for the Unemployment
Insurance (UI) Facilitation of Claimant
Reemployment; Comment Request
[TA–W–62,608]
AGENCY:
Precision Magnetics Division of Arnold
Magnetics Technologies; Wayne, NJ;
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated February 20,
2008, a worker requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The
determination was issued on February
4, 2008. The Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on February 22, 2008 (73 FR 9836).
The determination was based on the
Department’s findings that, during the
relevant period, the subject firm did not
shift production of magnetic
components and assemblies to a foreign
country and did not import magnetic
components and assemblies. The
determination also stated that the
workers’ separations are attributable to
a domestic shift of production.
The request for reconsideration
alleges that the subject workers do not
produce magnetic components and
assemblies but produce magnets,
magnet production shifted to China, the
subject firm is likely to import magnets
following the shift abroad, and the
subject firm’s customers have increased
their magnet imports.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and has determined that the Department
will conduct further investigation.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:03 Mar 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
Employment and Training
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, the Department of Labor
(Department) conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the
general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing collections
of information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that the
requested data can be provided in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed.
A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
by contacting the office listed below in
the addressee section of this notice or by
accessing: https://www.doleta.gov/
OMBCN/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Submit comments to the office
listed in the addressee section below on
or before May 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to
Andrew W. Spisak, Office of Workforce
Security, Employment and Training
Administration, U. S. Department of
Labor, Room S–4522, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone: 202–693–3196 (this is not a
toll-free number); fax: 202–693–3975; email: spisak.andrew@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: Required by Congress
under the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the
Department’s Strategic Plan is an
integral part of the budget process.
Among the purposes of the GPRA are to
improve Federal program effectiveness
and public accountability by focusing
on program results, service quality, and
customer satisfaction.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13013
Strategic Goal 4 in the Department’s
fiscal year (FY) 2006—2011 strategic
plan—Strengthened Economic
Protections —focuses on improving the
operational performance and
effectiveness of the federal/state UI
program. Performance Goal 4A supports
this goal with performance measures to
‘‘Make timely and accurate benefit
payments to unemployed workers,
facilitate the reemployment of
unemployment insurance beneficiaries,
and set up unemployment tax accounts
promptly for new employers.’’
ETA collects the data to measure the
facilitation of reemployment of UI
benefit recipients through the ETA 9047
report. OMB approved the Department’s
request to begin collecting UI
reemployment data through the ETA
9047 report on July 26, 2005. ETA
issued reporting instructions in
Unemployment Insurance Program
Letter (UIPL) No. 1–06 (October 6,
2005), and State Workforce Agencies
began reporting data to ETA in March
2006.
Using the reemployment data
submitted by the states through the ETA
9047 report, ETA calculated a baseline
for the UI GPRA reemployment rate
measure. In Training and Employment
Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 24–05
Change 1, ETA announced that the
baseline reemployment rate was 62.4%,
and set the FY 2007 GPRA Facilitate
Reemployment goal at 65%. The TEGL
also advised states that the development
of a UI Performs measure ‘‘with a
criterion by which to assess individual
states’’ success in facilitating UI
reemployment’’ was in progress.
Data Collection
Each calendar quarter, states report on
the ETA 9047 report separate counts for
individuals receiving their first UI
payments who are exempt from work
search/employment service registration
(‘‘exempt’’), in most cases because they
are job-attached with definite recall
dates, and those who must conduct
work search or register with the
employment service (‘‘nonexempt’’).
States also report on the ETA 9047
report the number of those first payment
recipients for whom intrastate or out-ofstate employers reported wages in the
subsequent quarter. States obtain these
counts by running computer
crossmatches of the Social Security
Numbers (SSNs) of the claimants who
received a first UI payment with the UI
wage records for the subsequent
calendar quarter. ETA issued
instructions on obtaining out-of-state
reemployment data through matching
the SSNs of UI first payment recipients
with UI wage records in the National
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
13014
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Notices
Directory of New Hires in UIPL No. 1–
06, Change 1 (August 2, 2006).
A facsimile of the ETA 9047 report is
shown below. Reporting instructions for
the ETA 9047 report are found in ET
Handbook 401, 4th edition, section IV,
chapter 7.
ETA 9047—REMPLOYMENT OF UI BENEFIT RECIPIENTS
Report for period ending—
Region—Number of claimants receiving 1st payment
State—Exemption Code
Number of Intrastate Crossmatch
Hits: YYYY.Q+1
Number of Interstate Crossmatch
Hits: YYYY.Q+1
0—Not Exempt ................................
1—Exempt .......................................
Comments
OMB No.: 1205–0452.
OMB Expiration Date: 07/31/2008.
OMB Burden Minutes: 600.
OMB Burden Statement: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S. Office
of Management and Budget has
approved the reporting requirements for
the ETA 9047 report under OMB
approval No. 1205–0452 to expire July
31, 2008. The estimated reporting
burden for this report is 10 hours.
UI Reemployment GPRA Measure
The UI reemployment GPRA measure
is defined as the percentage of all UI
claimants receiving a first payment in a
calendar quarter who were paid wages
in the following calendar quarter that
appear in UI wage records.
ETA believes that this measure
encourages the agencies that administer
UI—which share responsibility with all
Workforce Investment partners in
facilitating the reemployment of UI
beneficiaries—to be innovative in the
steps they take to facilitate these
individuals’ reemployment. Insights
gained about the combinations of
reemployment efforts and UI eligibility
conditions that promote the quick
return of UI beneficiaries to suitable
work will be shared with state UI
agencies.
The following table summarizes
GPRA targets and performance for the
UI reemployment measure.
GPRA TARGETS AND PERFORMANCE
FY 2006
target
Goal and indicator
Facilitate Reemployment:
Percent of UI claimants who were reemployed by the end of the first quarter after the quarter in which they received their first payment .......................................................................
FY 2006
actual
FY 2007
target
FY 2008
target
*62.4
64.2
65.0
65.2
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
* Based on baseline data submitted March 2006.
II. Desired Focus of Comments: The
Department is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
III. Current Actions: ETA issued UIPL
No. 12–08 [February 13, 2008] to solicit
comment on the proposed definition for
the UI Performs core measure,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Mar 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
‘‘Facilitate the Reemployment of UI
Claimants’’ and the approach used for
setting the Acceptable Level of
Performance (ALP). We are proposing
using the same definition for the UI
Performs core measure as for the GPRA
measure for purposes of consistency and
its uniform application to all states.
ETA’s analysis of the UI
reemployment data show that state
performance in reemployment of UI
benefit recipients is influenced by forces
outside the control of the agency
administering the state UI law, most
notably by the economic conditions in
the state, as measured by the Total
Unemployment Rate (TUR), and the
percent of UI benefit recipients that are
on temporary layoff, as measured by the
percent of claimants who not required
to search for work or register with the
state employment service. The proposed
ALP’s for the UI Performs Core measure
reflect state-specific data for these two
factors. UIPL No. 12–08 includes a
detailed explanation of the methodology
used to develop the proposed ALP.
Type of Review: Extension without
change.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Agency: Employment and Training
Administration.
Title: Unemployment Insurance
Facilitation of Claimant Reemployment.
Record keeping: Per ET Handbook
401, 4th edition, p. v, ‘‘source data
supporting counts [reported] should be
retained for at least three years.’’
Affected Public: State Workforce
Agencies(SWAs).
Frequency: Quarterly.
Total Respondents: 53 SWAs.
Total Responses: 212 per year (53
SWAs × 4 quarterly reports per year).
Estimated Time Per Response: SWA
staff—10 hours.
Total Burden Hours: 2,120 hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
This is an established data collection for
which no changes are proposed; there
are no startup costs.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintaining): $77,168 (annual) (53
SWAs at $1,456 per SWA).
Comments submitted in response to
this request will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of the information collection
request; they will also become a matter
of public record.
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Notices
Dated: March 4, 2008.
Cheryl Atkinson,
Administrator, Office of Workforce Security,
Washington, DC.
[FR Doc. E8–4657 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,396]
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Atreum-Brighton, a Subsidiary of
Magna International Decoma
International Division Including OnSite Leased Workers From Qualified
Staffing, Aerotek and On-Site Workers
From Hubbard Supply Company and
Robert Half Management Resources;
Brighton, MI; Amended Certification
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on November 14, 2007,
applicable to workers of AtreumBrighton, a subsidiary of Magna
International, Decoma International
Division, including on-site leased
workers from Qualified Staffing and
Aerotek, Brighton, Michigan. The notice
was published in the Federal Register
on December 10, 2007 (72 FR 69710).
The certification was amended on
January 8, 2008 to include workers of
Hubbard Supply Company working onsite at the Brighton, Michigan location.
The notice was published on January
15, 2008 (73 FR 2543).
At the request of a company official,
the Department reviewed the
certification for workers of the subject
firm. The workers are engaged in the
production of door panels and various
other injection molded parts for the
automobile industry.
New information shows that workers
of Robert Half Management Resources
were employed on-site at the Brighton,
Michigan location of Atreum-Brighton, a
subsidiary of Magna International,
Decoma International Division. The
Department has determined that these
workers were sufficiently under the
control of the subject firm and should be
considered part of the affected worker
group.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Mar 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include workers of
Robert Half Management Resources who
were employed on-site at the Brighton,
Michigan location of the subject firm.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers
employed at Atreum-Brighton, a
subsidiary of Magna International,
Decoma International Division,
Brighton, Michigan who were adverselyimpacted by a shift in production of
door panels and various other injection
molded parts for automobile industry to
Mexico and Canada.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–62,396 is hereby issued as
follows:
‘‘All workers of Atreum-Brighton, a
subsidiary of Magna International, Decoma
International Division, including on-site
leased workers from Qualified Staffing and
Aerotek, and on-site workers from Hubbard
Supply Company and Robert Half
Management Resources, Brighton, Michigan,
who became totally or partially separated
from employment on or after October 30,
2006, through November 14, 2009, are
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974,
and are also eligible to apply for alternative
trade adjustment assistance under Section
246 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’
Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of
March 2008.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–4666 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,180]
Cooper Standard Automotive Fluid
Systems Division—Archbold, OH Plant
Including On-Site Leased Workers
From Kelly Services, Msx International
and Angola Personnel; Archbold, OH;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on February 4, 2008,
applicable to workers of Cooper
Standard Automotive, Fluid Systems
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13015
Division—Archbold, Ohio Plant,
Archbold, Ohio, including on-site
leased workers from Kelly Services and
MSX International. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
February 22, 2008 (73 FR 9835).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of brazed and coated, welded and
stainless steel tubing for automotive fuel
and brake applications.
New information shows that leased
workers of Angola Personnel were
employed on-site at the Archbold, Ohio
location of Fluid Systems Division,
Archbold, Ohio Plant of Cooper
Standard Automotive. The Department
has determined that these workers were
sufficiently under the control of the
subject firm to be considered leased
workers.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include leased workers
of Angola Personnel working on-site at
the Fluid Systems Division, Archbold,
Ohio Plant location of the subject firm.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers at
Cooper Standard Automotive, Fluid
Systems Division, Archbold, Ohio Plant,
Archbold, Ohio who were adverselyimpacted by increased imports of brazed
and coated, welded and stainless steel
tubing for automotive fuel and brake
applications.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–62,180 is hereby issued as
follows:
‘‘All workers of Cooper Standard
Automotive, Fluid Systems Division—
Archbold, Ohio Plant, Archbold, Ohio,
including on-site leased workers from Kelly
Services, MSX International, and Angola
Personnel, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
September 20, 2006, through February 4,
2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC this 5th day of
March 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–4665 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13013-13015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4657]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Continuing Information Collection Request for the Unemployment
Insurance (UI) Facilitation of Claimant Reemployment; Comment Request
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, the Department of Labor (Department) conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program
helps to ensure that the requested data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed.
A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be
obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section
of this notice or by accessing: https://www.doleta.gov/OMBCN/
OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Submit comments to the office listed in the addressee section
below on or before May 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Andrew W. Spisak, Office of Workforce
Security, Employment and Training Administration, U. S. Department of
Labor, Room S-4522, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone: 202-693-3196 (this is not a toll-free number); fax: 202-693-
3975; e-mail: spisak.andrew@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: Required by Congress under the Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Department's Strategic
Plan is an integral part of the budget process. Among the purposes of
the GPRA are to improve Federal program effectiveness and public
accountability by focusing on program results, service quality, and
customer satisfaction.
Strategic Goal 4 in the Department's fiscal year (FY) 2006--2011
strategic plan--Strengthened Economic Protections --focuses on
improving the operational performance and effectiveness of the federal/
state UI program. Performance Goal 4A supports this goal with
performance measures to ``Make timely and accurate benefit payments to
unemployed workers, facilitate the reemployment of unemployment
insurance beneficiaries, and set up unemployment tax accounts promptly
for new employers.''
ETA collects the data to measure the facilitation of reemployment
of UI benefit recipients through the ETA 9047 report. OMB approved the
Department's request to begin collecting UI reemployment data through
the ETA 9047 report on July 26, 2005. ETA issued reporting instructions
in Unemployment Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) No. 1-06 (October 6,
2005), and State Workforce Agencies began reporting data to ETA in
March 2006.
Using the reemployment data submitted by the states through the ETA
9047 report, ETA calculated a baseline for the UI GPRA reemployment
rate measure. In Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 24-
05 Change 1, ETA announced that the baseline reemployment rate was
62.4%, and set the FY 2007 GPRA Facilitate Reemployment goal at 65%.
The TEGL also advised states that the development of a UI Performs
measure ``with a criterion by which to assess individual states''
success in facilitating UI reemployment'' was in progress.
Data Collection
Each calendar quarter, states report on the ETA 9047 report
separate counts for individuals receiving their first UI payments who
are exempt from work search/employment service registration
(``exempt''), in most cases because they are job-attached with definite
recall dates, and those who must conduct work search or register with
the employment service (``nonexempt'').
States also report on the ETA 9047 report the number of those first
payment recipients for whom intrastate or out-of-state employers
reported wages in the subsequent quarter. States obtain these counts by
running computer crossmatches of the Social Security Numbers (SSNs) of
the claimants who received a first UI payment with the UI wage records
for the subsequent calendar quarter. ETA issued instructions on
obtaining out-of-state reemployment data through matching the SSNs of
UI first payment recipients with UI wage records in the National
[[Page 13014]]
Directory of New Hires in UIPL No. 1-06, Change 1 (August 2, 2006).
A facsimile of the ETA 9047 report is shown below. Reporting
instructions for the ETA 9047 report are found in ET Handbook 401, 4th
edition, section IV, chapter 7.
ETA 9047--Remployment of UI Benefit Recipients
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report for period ending--
Region--Number of claimants receiving 1st ------------------------------------------------------------------------
State--Exemption Code payment Number of Intrastate Crossmatch Hits: Number of Interstate
YYYY.Q+1 Crossmatch Hits: YYYY.Q+1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0--Not Exempt....................... ......................................... ......................................... ............................
1--Exempt........................... ......................................... ......................................... ............................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
OMB No.: 1205-0452.
OMB Expiration Date: 07/31/2008.
OMB Burden Minutes: 600.
OMB Burden Statement: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget has approved the
reporting requirements for the ETA 9047 report under OMB approval No.
1205-0452 to expire July 31, 2008. The estimated reporting burden for
this report is 10 hours.
UI Reemployment GPRA Measure
The UI reemployment GPRA measure is defined as the percentage of
all UI claimants receiving a first payment in a calendar quarter who
were paid wages in the following calendar quarter that appear in UI
wage records.
ETA believes that this measure encourages the agencies that
administer UI--which share responsibility with all Workforce Investment
partners in facilitating the reemployment of UI beneficiaries--to be
innovative in the steps they take to facilitate these individuals'
reemployment. Insights gained about the combinations of reemployment
efforts and UI eligibility conditions that promote the quick return of
UI beneficiaries to suitable work will be shared with state UI
agencies.
The following table summarizes GPRA targets and performance for the
UI reemployment measure.
GPRA Targets and Performance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2006 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
Goal and indicator target actual target target
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facilitate Reemployment:
Percent of UI claimants who were reemployed by the end of the *62.4 64.2 65.0 65.2
first quarter after the quarter in which they received their
first payment..................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Based on baseline data submitted March 2006.
II. Desired Focus of Comments: The Department is particularly
interested in comments which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
III. Current Actions: ETA issued UIPL No. 12-08 [February 13,
2008] to solicit comment on the proposed definition for the UI Performs
core measure, ``Facilitate the Reemployment of UI Claimants'' and the
approach used for setting the Acceptable Level of Performance (ALP). We
are proposing using the same definition for the UI Performs core
measure as for the GPRA measure for purposes of consistency and its
uniform application to all states.
ETA's analysis of the UI reemployment data show that state
performance in reemployment of UI benefit recipients is influenced by
forces outside the control of the agency administering the state UI
law, most notably by the economic conditions in the state, as measured
by the Total Unemployment Rate (TUR), and the percent of UI benefit
recipients that are on temporary layoff, as measured by the percent of
claimants who not required to search for work or register with the
state employment service. The proposed ALP's for the UI Performs Core
measure reflect state-specific data for these two factors. UIPL No. 12-
08 includes a detailed explanation of the methodology used to develop
the proposed ALP.
Type of Review: Extension without change.
Agency: Employment and Training Administration.
Title: Unemployment Insurance Facilitation of Claimant
Reemployment.
Record keeping: Per ET Handbook 401, 4th edition, p. v, ``source
data supporting counts [reported] should be retained for at least three
years.''
Affected Public: State Workforce Agencies(SWAs).
Frequency: Quarterly.
Total Respondents: 53 SWAs.
Total Responses: 212 per year (53 SWAs x 4 quarterly reports per
year).
Estimated Time Per Response: SWA staff--10 hours.
Total Burden Hours: 2,120 hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): This is an established data
collection for which no changes are proposed; there are no startup
costs.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintaining): $77,168 (annual) (53
SWAs at $1,456 per SWA).
Comments submitted in response to this request will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the information
collection request; they will also become a matter of public record.
[[Page 13015]]
Dated: March 4, 2008.
Cheryl Atkinson,
Administrator, Office of Workforce Security, Washington, DC.
[FR Doc. E8-4657 Filed 3-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P
