Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange, LLC; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Trading of Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs), 12234-12236 [E8-4315]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
12234
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 8 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder,9 since it establishes or
changes a due, fee or other charge
imposed by the Exchange. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission
may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise
in the furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.10
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Amex–2008–12 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2008–12. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
10 For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
within which the Commission may summarily
abrogate the proposed rule change under Section
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers
the period to commence on February 27, 2008, the
date on which Amex filed Amendment No. 2. See
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
9 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:57 Mar 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of Amex. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–Amex–2008–12 and should be
submitted on or before March 27, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–4312 Filed 3–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–57400; File No. SR–Amex–
2007–109]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange, LLC; Order
Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change as Modified by Amendment
No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Trading
of Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs)
February 29, 2008.
I. Introduction
On October 9, 2007, the American
Stock Exchange, LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend Section 107 of the Amex
Company Guide (‘‘Company Guide’’) to
permit certain index-linked securities,
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
commodity-linked securities, and
currency-linked securities to trade
under the rules applicable to exchangetraded funds (‘‘ETFs’’). On January 11,
2008, the Amex submitted Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The
proposed rule change, as amended, was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on January 30, 2008.3 The
Commission received no comment
letters on the proposal. This order
approves the proposed rule change, as
amended.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Sections 107D, 107E and 107F of the
Company Guide to permit certain indexlinked securities (‘‘Index-Linked
Securities’’), commodity-linked
securities (‘‘Commodity-Linked
Securities’’), and currency-linked
securities (‘‘Currency-Linked
Securities’’) (collectively, ‘‘ExchangeTraded Notes’’ or ‘‘ETNs’’) that offer a
weekly redemption feature to be traded
subject to the AEMI trading rules
specific to ETFs.
Background
Securities listed pursuant to Section
107 of the Company Guide (‘‘Section
107 Securities’’) are debt securities of an
issuer that typically provide for a cash
payment at maturity, or if available,
upon earlier redemption (such as a
weekly redemption feature) at the
holder’s option, based on the
performance of an underlying index or
asset. Permitted underlying assets for
Index-Linked Securities include
domestic and international equity
indexes. Commodity-Linked Securities
may be based on a commodity index,
basket of commodities, or single
commodity while Currency-Linked
Securities may similarly be linked to a
currency index, basket of currencies, or
single currency.
Section 107 Securities typically have
a term of at least one year but not greater
than 30 years. The issuer may or may
not provide for periodic interest
payments to holders. The holder of a
Section 107 Security may or may not be
fully exposed to the appreciation and/or
depreciation of the underlying asset.
A number of Section 107 Securities
based on securities indexes that are
listed and traded on the Exchange
provide for a payment amount in a
multiple of the positive index return or
performance, subject to a maximum gain
or cap. The Exchange’s generic listing
standards for Section 107 Securities
11 17
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00165
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57187
(January 23, 2008), 73 FR 5604.
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Notices
allow for the multiple performance on
the upside but prohibit payment at
maturity based on a multiple of the
negative performance of an underlying
asset. Section 107 Securities may or may
not provide for a minimum guaranteed
amount to be repaid, i.e., ‘‘principal
protection.’’
Section 107 Securities do not give the
holder a right to receive the underlying
asset or any other ownership right or
interest in the underlying portfolio. The
current value of the underlying asset is
required to be widely disseminated at
least every 15 seconds during the
trading day. Section 107 Securities are
‘‘hybrid’’ securities whose rates of
return are largely the result of the
performance of an underlying asset. In
addition, prior to the listing and trading
of Section 107 Securities, the Exchange
typically highlights and discloses the
special risks and characteristics of such
security in an Information Circular.
Current Rules
Sections 107D,4 107E,5 and 107F 6 of
the Company Guide treat Index-Linked
Securities, Commodity-Linked
Securities and Currency-Linked
Securities as equity instruments subject
to the Exchange’s AEMI trading rules for
equities. The only exception to this
requirement is when a Section 107
Security is listed as a bond or debt (i.e.,
in $1,000 denominations). In such a
case, the Section 107 Security is subject
to Exchange rules applicable to bond or
debt securities.7
Because the current Rules deem ETNs
and other Section 107 Securities as
‘‘equity instruments,’’ the full range of
AEMI trading rules specific to equities
apply to all Section 107 Securities
regardless of the particular structure of
the Section 107 Security.
Proposal
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
With respect to an ETN that is
continuously-offered with a weekly
redemption option (such as BWV), the
Exchange proposes that the AEMI
trading rules applicable to ETFs (rather
than equities) should equally apply to
such ETN. In order to qualify, the ETN
would be required to offer a weekly
redemption option to holders (‘‘Eligible
ETNs’’). The following rules specifically
applicable to ETF trading would apply
to the trading of Eligible ETNs:
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51563
(April 15, 2005), 70 FR 21257 (April 25, 2005) (SR–
Amex–2005–001).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55794
(May 22, 2007), 72 FR 29558 (May 29, 2007) (SR–
Amex–2007–45).
6 Id.
7 Id.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:57 Mar 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Rule 108—AEMI(c). The execution
of Eligible ETN orders at the opening
would be effected in the same manner
as ETFs so that orders in Eligible ETNs
would be executed before any brokerdealer bids or offers.
• Rule 110—AEMI(p). A Registered
Trader in ETFs (including Eligible
ETNs) would only actively quote ETFs
traded on the same or contiguous panels
for a maximum of three contiguous
panels. A Registered Trader would also
not actively quote more than a
maximum of 15 ETFs (including Eligible
ETNs). A Senior Floor Official of the
Exchange may modify this restriction if
a Registered Trader is able to
appropriately fulfill his obligations to
the market due to the level of activity in
the ETFs and their proximity.
• Rule 128A—AEMI(d)(iv). Any
quotation in an ETF entered into the
AEMI platform by the specialist or
Registered Trader while Auto-Ex is
enabled that would cause the Amex
Published Quote (APQ) to be locked or
crossed would be automatically
executed. In the case of a non-ETF
Amex-listed security or a non-Nasdaq
UTP equity security, quotations that are
entered into the AEMI platform by the
specialist while Auto-Ex is enabled that
would cause the APQ to cross would be
rejected. Therefore, Eligible ETNs would
be automatically executed, rather than
rejected, when a specialist or Registered
Trader quotation causes the APQ to be
locked/crossed when Auto-Ex is
enabled.
• Rule 128A—AEMI(f)(iv). AEMI does
not automatically execute non-ETF
orders when the automatic execution of
an order exceeds the price change
parameters of the ‘‘1%, 2, 1, 1⁄2 point’’
rule. This rule does not apply to ETFs
and would accordingly not apply to the
trading of Eligible ETNs.
• Rule 131—AEMI(o). AEMI rejects
‘‘too marketable’’ non-ETF stop and stop
limit orders. ‘‘Too marketable’’ is
defined as a buy stop order received
during the regular trading session with
a stop price equal to the bid or lower,
or a sell stop order received during the
regular trading session with a stop price
equal to the offer or higher. ETF stop
orders that are ‘‘too marketable’’ are
executed by AEMI under this Rule, and
accordingly, Eligible ETN stop orders
would similarly be executed.
• Rule 131—AEMI(r). AEMI does not
accept electronic cross orders for nonETFs and non-Nasdaq UTP securities.
As a result, electronic cross orders are
acceptable only for ETFs. As proposed,
electronic cross orders for Eligible ETNs
would be acceptable in AEMI.
• Rule 154—AEMI(c)(i). The Stop
Order Rule requires floor official
PO 00000
Frm 00166
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12235
approval prior to the specialist electing
a stop order by selling to the bid/buying
on the offer. Prior floor official approval
is not required for ETFs and would
similarly not apply to Eligible ETNs.
• Rule 154—AEMI(c)(ii). Stop and
stop limit orders in ETFs are elected by
a quotation, although such orders in
non-ETFs are not. Accordingly, stop and
stop limit orders in Eligible ETNs would
similarly be elected by quotation,
pursuant to this rule.
• Rule 154—AEMI(e). Maximum
price variation requirements are set
forth in Rule 154—AEMI(e) (also known
as the ‘‘1%–2, 1, .5 Point Rule). This
Rule specifically provides that it does
not apply to the trading of ETFs.
Accordingly, Rule 154—AEMI(e) would
similarly not apply to Eligible ETNs.
• Commentary .03 to Rule 170—
AEMI. A specialist quotation, made for
his own account, should be such that a
transaction effected at his quoted price
or within the quoted spread, whether
having the effect of reducing or
increasing the specialist’s position,
would bear a proper relation, in the case
of ETFs or other derivatively-based
securities, to the value of underlying or
related securities. Eligible ETNs would
similarly be subject to this requirement.
• Commentary .11 to Rule 170—
AEMI. Commentary .11 to Rule 170—
AEMI specifically exempts ETFs from
the stabilization requirements.
Accordingly, Eligible ETNs would
similarly be exempt.
• Rule 206—AEMI. This Rule
prohibits a specialist from crossing the
market for the purpose of electing oddlots and requires floor official approval
in various circumstances for non-ETFs.
The exemption for ETFs would
similarly apply to Eligible ETNs.
Eligible ETNs would also be subject to
the same parity allocation as currently
exists for ETFs and other equity-traded
products that are not listed stocks, UTP
stocks, or closed-end funds.
III. Discussion
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities exchange 8 and, in
particular, the requirements of Section
6(b) of the Act 9 and the rules and
regulations thereunder. Specifically, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
8 In approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
12236
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Notices
Act,10 in that the proposal is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitating transaction in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
The Commission believes that the
market price of Eligible ETNs should
exhibit a strong correlation to the
performance of the relevant underlying
asset, since holders of such securities
will be unlikely to sell them for less
than their redemption value if they have
a weekly right to be redeemed for their
full value. This weekly redemption
feature is similar to the daily
redemption feature available in ETFs. In
addition, Eligible ETNs are typically
continuously offered, on a daily basis,
so that the issuer would have the ability
to issue new securities from time to time
at market prices. This process is similar
to the manner in which ETFs are
continuously offered via the creation/
redemption process in Creation Unit
aggregations (i.e., 50,000 shares).
Accordingly, the Commission believes
the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Act in permitting Eligible ETNs
to trade subject to the Exchange’s AEMI
trading rules for ETFs.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,11 that the
proposed rule change (SR–Amex–2007–
109), as modified, is hereby approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–4315 Filed 3–5–08; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
10 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
11 15
16:57 Mar 05, 2008
[Release No. 34–57406; File No. SR–DTC–
2007–06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Depository Trust Company; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To
Modify the Hearing Procedures
Afforded to Interested Persons for
Membership and Harmonize Them
With Similar Rules of Its Affiliates
February 29, 2008.
I. Introduction
On April 30, 2007, the Depository
Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) proposed rule change
SR–DTC–2007–06 pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).1 The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on December 6,
2007.2 No comment letters were
received on the proposal. This order
approves the proposal.
II. Description
The proposed rule change (1)
modifies DTC’s rules regarding hearing
procedures afforded to Interested
Persons 3 and (2) where practicable or
beneficial, harmonizes such rules with
similar rules of DTC’s affiliates, the
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation
(‘‘FICC’’) and the National Securities
Clearing Corporation (‘‘NSCC’’).4
A. Minor Rule Violation Plan
In 1984, the Commission adopted
amendments to Rule 19d–1(c) under the
Act 5 that allow self-regulatory
organizations with Commission
approval to adopt plans for the
disposition of minor violations of rules.6
Currently under DTC’s rules, an
Interested Person subject to disciplinary
action has a right to a hearing before a
panel selected by the Chairman of the
Board from a pool of persons that are
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Exchange Act Release No. 56863
(Nov. 29, 2007), 72 FR 68920.
3 An Interested Person is defined by DTC’s Rules
as a Participant, Pledgee, or applicant to become a
Participant or Pledgee, or issuer of a Security. Rule
22, Section 1.
4 FICC and NSCC have filed similar proposed rule
changes. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56864
(Nov. 29, 2007), 72 FR 68922, Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 57405 (Feb. 29, 2008) [SR–FICC–
2007–06]. Securities Exchange Act Release No.
56865 (Nov. 29, 2007), 72 FR 68930, Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 57404 (Feb. 29, 2008)
[SR–NSCC–2007–06].
5 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c).
6 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 21013
(June 1, 1984), 49 FR 23828 (June 8, 1984) [File No.
S7–983A].
2 Securities
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00167
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
employed by or are partners of DTC’s
participants. Because some rule
violations are not sufficiently serious to
merit Board review, DTC is adopting a
Minor Rule Violation Plan within the
meaning of Rule 19d–1(c)(2) under the
Act for those rule violations DTC deems
minor. Consistent with Rule 19d–1(c)(2)
under the Act, DTC is designating as
minor rule violations those rule
violations for which a fine may be
assessed in an amount not to exceed
$5,000. If an Interested Person disputes
a fine imposed by DTC by filing a
written request for hearing and a written
statement setting forth, among other
things, the action or proposed action
with respect to which the hearing is
being requested and the basis for
objection to such action, DTC
management would have the authority
to waive the fine. DTC management
would notify the Board of Directors or
a Committee authorized by the Board of
Directors of its determination to waive
the fine and would provide the reasons
for the waiver. The Board or Committee
could in its discretion decide to
reinstate any fine waived by DTC
management. If DTC management were
not to waive the fine, the Interested
Person could appeal the decision to a
panel comprised of DTC officers
(‘‘Minor Rule Violation Panel’’).
B. Hearings for All Other Violations and
Minor Rule Violation Appeals
For matters involving (1) an alleged
violation of a DTC rule for which a fine
in an amount of over $5,000 is assessed,
(2) applicants for membership, (3) other
disciplinary actions to which the Minor
Rule Violation Plan would not apply, or
(4) for appeals from a Minor Rule
Violation Panel decision adverse to an
Interested Person, the Interested Person
is entitled to a hearing before a panel
selected by the Chairman of the Board
from a pool of persons that are
employed by or are partners of
participants. Members of the pool are
appointed by the Board or by the
Chairman. Decisions of the panel are
final; however, the full Board of
Directors retains the right to modify any
sanction or reverse any decision of the
panel that is adverse to the Interested
Person.
Currently with respect to hearings, an
Interested Person is afforded the
opportunity to be heard and may be
represented by counsel if desired. A
record is kept of the hearing, and at the
discretion of the panel, the associated
cost may be charged in whole or part to
the Interested Person in the event that
the decision is adverse to the Interested
Person. The Interested Person is advised
of the panel’s decision within ten
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 45 (Thursday, March 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12234-12236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4315]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-57400; File No. SR-Amex-2007-109]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange, LLC;
Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change as Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Trading of Exchange Traded
Notes (ETNs)
February 29, 2008.
I. Introduction
On October 9, 2007, the American Stock Exchange, LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Section 107 of the Amex Company Guide
(``Company Guide'') to permit certain index-linked securities,
commodity-linked securities, and currency-linked securities to trade
under the rules applicable to exchange-traded funds (``ETFs''). On
January 11, 2008, the Amex submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change. The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on January 30, 2008.\3\ The Commission
received no comment letters on the proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57187 (January 23,
2008), 73 FR 5604.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Sections 107D, 107E and 107F of the
Company Guide to permit certain index-linked securities (``Index-Linked
Securities''), commodity-linked securities (``Commodity-Linked
Securities''), and currency-linked securities (``Currency-Linked
Securities'') (collectively, ``Exchange-Traded Notes'' or ``ETNs'')
that offer a weekly redemption feature to be traded subject to the AEMI
trading rules specific to ETFs.
Background
Securities listed pursuant to Section 107 of the Company Guide
(``Section 107 Securities'') are debt securities of an issuer that
typically provide for a cash payment at maturity, or if available, upon
earlier redemption (such as a weekly redemption feature) at the
holder's option, based on the performance of an underlying index or
asset. Permitted underlying assets for Index-Linked Securities include
domestic and international equity indexes. Commodity-Linked Securities
may be based on a commodity index, basket of commodities, or single
commodity while Currency-Linked Securities may similarly be linked to a
currency index, basket of currencies, or single currency.
Section 107 Securities typically have a term of at least one year
but not greater than 30 years. The issuer may or may not provide for
periodic interest payments to holders. The holder of a Section 107
Security may or may not be fully exposed to the appreciation and/or
depreciation of the underlying asset.
A number of Section 107 Securities based on securities indexes that
are listed and traded on the Exchange provide for a payment amount in a
multiple of the positive index return or performance, subject to a
maximum gain or cap. The Exchange's generic listing standards for
Section 107 Securities
[[Page 12235]]
allow for the multiple performance on the upside but prohibit payment
at maturity based on a multiple of the negative performance of an
underlying asset. Section 107 Securities may or may not provide for a
minimum guaranteed amount to be repaid, i.e., ``principal protection.''
Section 107 Securities do not give the holder a right to receive
the underlying asset or any other ownership right or interest in the
underlying portfolio. The current value of the underlying asset is
required to be widely disseminated at least every 15 seconds during the
trading day. Section 107 Securities are ``hybrid'' securities whose
rates of return are largely the result of the performance of an
underlying asset. In addition, prior to the listing and trading of
Section 107 Securities, the Exchange typically highlights and discloses
the special risks and characteristics of such security in an
Information Circular.
Current Rules
Sections 107D,\4\ 107E,\5\ and 107F \6\ of the Company Guide treat
Index-Linked Securities, Commodity-Linked Securities and Currency-
Linked Securities as equity instruments subject to the Exchange's AEMI
trading rules for equities. The only exception to this requirement is
when a Section 107 Security is listed as a bond or debt (i.e., in
$1,000 denominations). In such a case, the Section 107 Security is
subject to Exchange rules applicable to bond or debt securities.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51563 (April 15,
2005), 70 FR 21257 (April 25, 2005) (SR-Amex-2005-001).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55794 (May 22,
2007), 72 FR 29558 (May 29, 2007) (SR-Amex-2007-45).
\6\ Id.
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the current Rules deem ETNs and other Section 107
Securities as ``equity instruments,'' the full range of AEMI trading
rules specific to equities apply to all Section 107 Securities
regardless of the particular structure of the Section 107 Security.
Proposal
With respect to an ETN that is continuously-offered with a weekly
redemption option (such as BWV), the Exchange proposes that the AEMI
trading rules applicable to ETFs (rather than equities) should equally
apply to such ETN. In order to qualify, the ETN would be required to
offer a weekly redemption option to holders (``Eligible ETNs''). The
following rules specifically applicable to ETF trading would apply to
the trading of Eligible ETNs:
Rule 108--AEMI(c). The execution of Eligible ETN orders at
the opening would be effected in the same manner as ETFs so that orders
in Eligible ETNs would be executed before any broker-dealer bids or
offers.
Rule 110--AEMI(p). A Registered Trader in ETFs (including
Eligible ETNs) would only actively quote ETFs traded on the same or
contiguous panels for a maximum of three contiguous panels. A
Registered Trader would also not actively quote more than a maximum of
15 ETFs (including Eligible ETNs). A Senior Floor Official of the
Exchange may modify this restriction if a Registered Trader is able to
appropriately fulfill his obligations to the market due to the level of
activity in the ETFs and their proximity.
Rule 128A--AEMI(d)(iv). Any quotation in an ETF entered
into the AEMI platform by the specialist or Registered Trader while
Auto-Ex is enabled that would cause the Amex Published Quote (APQ) to
be locked or crossed would be automatically executed. In the case of a
non-ETF Amex-listed security or a non-Nasdaq UTP equity security,
quotations that are entered into the AEMI platform by the specialist
while Auto-Ex is enabled that would cause the APQ to cross would be
rejected. Therefore, Eligible ETNs would be automatically executed,
rather than rejected, when a specialist or Registered Trader quotation
causes the APQ to be locked/crossed when Auto-Ex is enabled.
Rule 128A--AEMI(f)(iv). AEMI does not automatically
execute non-ETF orders when the automatic execution of an order exceeds
the price change parameters of the ``1%, 2, 1, \1/2\ point'' rule. This
rule does not apply to ETFs and would accordingly not apply to the
trading of Eligible ETNs.
Rule 131--AEMI(o). AEMI rejects ``too marketable'' non-ETF
stop and stop limit orders. ``Too marketable'' is defined as a buy stop
order received during the regular trading session with a stop price
equal to the bid or lower, or a sell stop order received during the
regular trading session with a stop price equal to the offer or higher.
ETF stop orders that are ``too marketable'' are executed by AEMI under
this Rule, and accordingly, Eligible ETN stop orders would similarly be
executed.
Rule 131--AEMI(r). AEMI does not accept electronic cross
orders for non-ETFs and non-Nasdaq UTP securities. As a result,
electronic cross orders are acceptable only for ETFs. As proposed,
electronic cross orders for Eligible ETNs would be acceptable in AEMI.
Rule 154--AEMI(c)(i). The Stop Order Rule requires floor
official approval prior to the specialist electing a stop order by
selling to the bid/buying on the offer. Prior floor official approval
is not required for ETFs and would similarly not apply to Eligible
ETNs.
Rule 154--AEMI(c)(ii). Stop and stop limit orders in ETFs
are elected by a quotation, although such orders in non-ETFs are not.
Accordingly, stop and stop limit orders in Eligible ETNs would
similarly be elected by quotation, pursuant to this rule.
Rule 154--AEMI(e). Maximum price variation requirements
are set forth in Rule 154--AEMI(e) (also known as the ``1%-2, 1, .5
Point Rule). This Rule specifically provides that it does not apply to
the trading of ETFs. Accordingly, Rule 154--AEMI(e) would similarly not
apply to Eligible ETNs.
Commentary .03 to Rule 170--AEMI. A specialist quotation,
made for his own account, should be such that a transaction effected at
his quoted price or within the quoted spread, whether having the effect
of reducing or increasing the specialist's position, would bear a
proper relation, in the case of ETFs or other derivatively-based
securities, to the value of underlying or related securities. Eligible
ETNs would similarly be subject to this requirement.
Commentary .11 to Rule 170--AEMI. Commentary .11 to Rule
170--AEMI specifically exempts ETFs from the stabilization
requirements. Accordingly, Eligible ETNs would similarly be exempt.
Rule 206--AEMI. This Rule prohibits a specialist from
crossing the market for the purpose of electing odd-lots and requires
floor official approval in various circumstances for non-ETFs. The
exemption for ETFs would similarly apply to Eligible ETNs.
Eligible ETNs would also be subject to the same parity allocation
as currently exists for ETFs and other equity-traded products that are
not listed stocks, UTP stocks, or closed-end funds.
III. Discussion
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange \8\ and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of
the Act \9\ and the rules and regulations thereunder. Specifically, the
Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5)
of the
[[Page 12236]]
Act,\10\ in that the proposal is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transaction in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the market price of Eligible ETNs
should exhibit a strong correlation to the performance of the relevant
underlying asset, since holders of such securities will be unlikely to
sell them for less than their redemption value if they have a weekly
right to be redeemed for their full value. This weekly redemption
feature is similar to the daily redemption feature available in ETFs.
In addition, Eligible ETNs are typically continuously offered, on a
daily basis, so that the issuer would have the ability to issue new
securities from time to time at market prices. This process is similar
to the manner in which ETFs are continuously offered via the creation/
redemption process in Creation Unit aggregations (i.e., 50,000 shares).
Accordingly, the Commission believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Act in permitting Eligible ETNs to trade subject to
the Exchange's AEMI trading rules for ETFs.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\11\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Amex-2007-109), as modified,
is hereby approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-4315 Filed 3-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
