Certain In-shell Roasted Pistachios from the Islamic Republic of Iran: Final Results of Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review, 9993-9994 [E8-3511]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 37 / Monday, February 25, 2008 / Notices
Dated: February 19, 2008.
Jeffrey Anspacher,
Director, Export Trading Company Affairs.
[FR Doc. E8–3478 Filed 2–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–507–601]
Certain In–shell Roasted Pistachios
from the Islamic Republic of Iran: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty New
Shipper Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 28, 2007, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register its preliminary results in the
countervailing duty (CVD) new shipper
review of certain in–shell roasted
pistachios from Iran. See Certain In–
shell Roasted Pistachios from the
Islamic Republic of Iran: Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty New
Shipper Review, 72 FR 67276
(Preliminary Results). The Department
has now completed this new shipper
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, the Department has
not revised the net subsidy rate for
Ahmadi’s Agricultural Productions,
Processing and Trade Complex
(Ahmadi), the respondent company in
this proceeding. The final net subsidy
rate for the reviewed company is listed
below in the section entitled ‘‘Final
Results of Review.’’
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
February 25, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Hargett, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Room 4225, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4161.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Background
On November 28, 2007, the
Department published in the Federal
Register its Preliminary Results. We
invited interested parties to comment on
these results. Since the preliminary
results, the following events have
occurred:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:34 Feb 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
On December 28, 2007, we received
case briefs from petitioners.1 In
response to a request from the
Department, CalPure submitted a
revised case brief on January 15, 2008.
A hearing was held in response to a
request from CalPure on January 17,
2008.
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.214(b), this new shipper review
covers only those producers or exporters
for which a review was specifically
requested. Accordingly, this new
shipper review covers Ahmadi and ten
programs for the period of review
January 1, 2006, through December 31,
2006.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is
all roasted in–shell pistachio nuts,
whether roasted in Iran or elsewhere,
from which the hull has been removed,
leaving the inner hard shells and the
edible meat, as currently classifiable in
the HTSUS under item number
0802.50.20.00. The written description
of the scope of this proceeding is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
For a discussion of the programs and
the issues raised in the briefs by parties
to this review, see the ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum’’ from Stephen
J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, concerning the ‘‘Final
Results of Countervailing Duty New
Shipper Review: Certain In–shell
Roasted Pistachios from the Islamic
Republic of Iran’’ (Decision
Memorandum), dated February 19,
2008, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. A listing of the issues which
parties raised and to which we have
responded, which are in the Decision
Memorandum, is attached to this notice
as Appendix I. Parties can find a
complete discussion of the issues raised
in this review and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum, which is on file in the
Central Records Unit (CRU), room 1117
of the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the World Wide Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
In accordance with section 777A(e)(1)
of the Act, 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), and 19
1 Petitioners include the Western Pistachio
Association (WPA) and its members and a domestic
interested party, Cal Pure Pistachios, Inc. (Cal Pure).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9993
CFR 351.214(i), we calculated an ad
valorem subsidy rate for Ahmadi for
calendar year 2006.
Producer/Exporter
Ahmadi’s Agricultural Productions, Processing and Trade
Complex (Ahmadi) ................
Net Subsidy
Rate
0.00 percent
ad valorem
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days
after the date of publication of the final
results of this new shipper review to
liquidate shipments of subject
merchandise by Ahmadi entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after January 1,
2006, through December 31, 2006,
without regard to countervailing duties
because a zero percent subsidy rate was
calculated.
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
new shipper review for all shipments of
subject merchandise from Ahmadi
entered or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise produced and exported by
Ahmadi, the cash deposit rate will be
zero; (2) for subject merchandise
produced by Ahmadi but not exported
by Ahmadi, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the all–others rate (i.e.,
317.89 percent ad valorem); and (3) for
subject merchandise exported by
Ahmadi but not produced by Ahmadi,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the all–others rate (i.e., 317.89 percent
ad valorem). The cash deposit rate for
all other producers and/or exporters is
not effected by these final results.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(2)(C), 751(a)(3) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
9994
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 37 / Monday, February 25, 2008 / Notices
Dated: February 19, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Appendix I – Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Analysis Of Programs
A. Programs Determined to Be Not Used
1. Provision of Fertilizer and
Machinery
2. Provision of Credit
3. Tax Exemptions
4. Provision of Water and Irrigation
Equipment
5. Technical Support
6. Duty Refunds on Imported Raw or
Intermediate Materials Used in the
Production of Export Goods
7. Program to Improve Quality of
Exports of Dried Fruit
8. Iranian Export Guarantee Fund
9. GOI Grants and Loans to Pistachio
Farmers
10. Crop Insurance for Pistachios
II. Total Ad Valorem Rate
III. Analysis Of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Ahmadi’s Sale of
Subject Merchandise Constitutes a Bona
Fide Sale
Comment 2: Whether the Department
Should Assign an Adverse Facts
Available Net Subsidy Rate to Ahmadi
Because of the GOI’s Failure to
Cooperate with the Department By
Providing Incomplete Questionnaire
Responses
Comment 3: Whether the Department
Should Assign an Adverse Facts
Available Net Subsidy Rate to Ahmadi
on the Grounds That it Failed to
Respond to the Department’s
Questionnaires to the Best of its Ability
Comment 4: Whether the All–Others
Rate Stated in the Preliminary Results Is
Inaccurate and Should Be Corrected
[FR Doc. E8–3511 Filed 2–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
International Trade Administration
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
(C–570–931)
Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless
Pressure Pipe from the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Initiation
of Countervailing Duty Investigation
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 25, 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:34 Feb 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
The Petition
On January 30, 2008, the Department
of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’)
received a petition filed in proper form
by Bristol Metals, L.P., Felker Brothers
Corp., Marcegaglia USA Inc.,
Outokumpu Stainless Pipe, Inc., and the
United Steel Workers of America (the
‘‘petitioners’’), domestic producers of
circular welded austenitic stainless
pressure pipe (‘‘CWASPP’’ or ‘‘subject
merchandise’’). In response to the
Department’s request, the petitioners
provided timely information
supplementing the petition on February
5, February 11, and February 14, 2008.
In accordance with Section 702(b)(1)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(‘‘the Act’’), the petitioners allege that
manufacturers, producers, or exporters
of CWASPP in the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) receive countervailable
subsidies within the meaning of Section
701 of the Act and that such imports are
materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, an industry in the
United States.
The Department finds that the
petitioners filed the petition on behalf of
the domestic industry because they are
interested parties as defined in Section
771(9)(C) of the Act and the petitioners
have demonstrated sufficient industry
support with respect to the
countervailing duty investigation (see
‘‘Determination of Industry Support for
the Petition’’ section below).
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’) is
January 1, 2007, through December 31,
2007.
Scope of the Investigation
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AGENCY:
Darla Brown or Eric Greynolds, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2849 and (202)
482–6071, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is circular welded
austenitic stainless pressure pipe
(‘‘CWASPP’’) not greater than 14 inches
in outside diameter. This merchandise
includes, but is not limited to, the
American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A–
778 specifications, or comparable
domestic or foreign specifications.
ASTM A–358 products are only
included when they are produced to
meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
specifications, or comparable domestic
or foreign specifications.
Excluded from the scope are: (1)
Welded stainless mechanical tubing,
meeting ASTM A–554 or comparable
domestic or foreign specifications; (2)
boiler, heat exchanger, superheater,
refining furnace, feedwater heater, and
condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A–
249, ASTM A–688 or comparable
domestic or foreign specifications; and
(3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM
A–269, ASTM A–270 or comparable
domestic or foreign specifications.
The subject imports are normally
classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005,
7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062,
7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). They may
also enter under HTSUS subheadings
7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015,
7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044,
7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes
only; the written description of the
scope is dispositive.
Comments on Scope of Investigation
During our review of the petition, we
discussed the scope with the petitioners
to ensure that it is an accurate reflection
of the products for which the domestic
industry is seeking relief. Moreover, as
discussed in the preamble to the
regulations, we are setting aside a
period for interested parties to raise
issues regarding product coverage. See
Antidumping Duties; Countervailing
Duties; Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323
(May 19, 1997). The Department
encourages all interested parties to
submit such comments within 20
calendar days of the publication of this
notice. Comments should be addressed
to Import Administration’s Central
Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room 1870, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230. The period of
scope consultations is intended to
provide the Department with ample
opportunity to consider all comments
and to consult with parties prior to the
issuance of the preliminary
determination.
Consultations
Pursuant to Section 702(b)(4)(A)(ii) of
the Act, the Department invited
representatives of the Government of the
PRC for consultations with respect to
the countervailing duty petition. The
Department held these consultations in
Beijing, China, with representatives of
the Government of the PRC on February
15, 2008. See the February 15, 2008,
Memorandum to The File, entitled,
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 37 (Monday, February 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9993-9994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3511]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-507-601]
Certain In-shell Roasted Pistachios from the Islamic Republic of
Iran: Final Results of Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 28, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal Register its preliminary results
in the countervailing duty (CVD) new shipper review of certain in-shell
roasted pistachios from Iran. See Certain In-shell Roasted Pistachios
from the Islamic Republic of Iran: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review, 72 FR 67276 (Preliminary
Results). The Department has now completed this new shipper review in
accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
Based on our analysis of the comments received, the Department has
not revised the net subsidy rate for Ahmadi's Agricultural Productions,
Processing and Trade Complex (Ahmadi), the respondent company in this
proceeding. The final net subsidy rate for the reviewed company is
listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 25, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Hargett, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Room 4225, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4161.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 28, 2007, the Department published in the Federal
Register its Preliminary Results. We invited interested parties to
comment on these results. Since the preliminary results, the following
events have occurred:
On December 28, 2007, we received case briefs from petitioners.\1\
In response to a request from the Department, CalPure submitted a
revised case brief on January 15, 2008. A hearing was held in response
to a request from CalPure on January 17, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petitioners include the Western Pistachio Association (WPA)
and its members and a domestic interested party, Cal Pure
Pistachios, Inc. (Cal Pure).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(b), this new shipper review
covers only those producers or exporters for which a review was
specifically requested. Accordingly, this new shipper review covers
Ahmadi and ten programs for the period of review January 1, 2006,
through December 31, 2006.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is all roasted in-shell pistachio
nuts, whether roasted in Iran or elsewhere, from which the hull has
been removed, leaving the inner hard shells and the edible meat, as
currently classifiable in the HTSUS under item number 0802.50.20.00.
The written description of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
For a discussion of the programs and the issues raised in the
briefs by parties to this review, see the ``Issues and Decision
Memorandum'' from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, concerning the ``Final Results of Countervailing
Duty New Shipper Review: Certain In-shell Roasted Pistachios from the
Islamic Republic of Iran'' (Decision Memorandum), dated February 19,
2008, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A listing of the issues
which parties raised and to which we have responded, which are in the
Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Parties
can find a complete discussion of the issues raised in this review and
the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is
on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room 1117 of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the World Wide Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
In accordance with section 777A(e)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5), and 19 CFR 351.214(i), we calculated an ad valorem
subsidy rate for Ahmadi for calendar year 2006.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Subsidy
Producer/Exporter Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahmadi's Agricultural Productions, Processing and Trade 0.00
Complex (Ahmadi).......................................... percent ad
valorem
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this new shipper review to
liquidate shipments of subject merchandise by Ahmadi entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 1, 2006,
through December 31, 2006, without regard to countervailing duties
because a zero percent subsidy rate was calculated.
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this new shipper review for all
shipments of subject merchandise from Ahmadi entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise produced and exported by Ahmadi, the cash deposit rate will
be zero; (2) for subject merchandise produced by Ahmadi but not
exported by Ahmadi, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the all-
others rate (i.e., 317.89 percent ad valorem); and (3) for subject
merchandise exported by Ahmadi but not produced by Ahmadi, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the all-others rate (i.e., 317.89
percent ad valorem). The cash deposit rate for all other producers and/
or exporters is not effected by these final results.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(C), 751(a)(3) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
[[Page 9994]]
Dated: February 19, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I - Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Analysis Of Programs
A. Programs Determined to Be Not Used
1. Provision of Fertilizer and Machinery
2. Provision of Credit
3. Tax Exemptions
4. Provision of Water and Irrigation Equipment
5. Technical Support
6. Duty Refunds on Imported Raw or Intermediate Materials Used in
the Production of Export Goods
7. Program to Improve Quality of Exports of Dried Fruit
8. Iranian Export Guarantee Fund
9. GOI Grants and Loans to Pistachio Farmers
10. Crop Insurance for Pistachios
II. Total Ad Valorem Rate
III. Analysis Of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Ahmadi's Sale of Subject Merchandise Constitutes a
Bona Fide Sale
Comment 2: Whether the Department Should Assign an Adverse Facts
Available Net Subsidy Rate to Ahmadi Because of the GOI's Failure to
Cooperate with the Department By Providing Incomplete Questionnaire
Responses
Comment 3: Whether the Department Should Assign an Adverse Facts
Available Net Subsidy Rate to Ahmadi on the Grounds That it Failed to
Respond to the Department's Questionnaires to the Best of its Ability
Comment 4: Whether the All-Others Rate Stated in the Preliminary
Results Is Inaccurate and Should Be Corrected
[FR Doc. E8-3511 Filed 2-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S