Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Incorporated, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark Corporation Including On-Site Leased Workers From Hewlett Packard, Neenah, WI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 9833-9834 [E8-3216]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Notices
Prosecutors—Benefits and Hooks:
Better judgments individually and
programmatically; more confidence in
decision making; more information
available can leverage service providers
to raise capacities; help manage
workload; collective accountability:
everyone vested in seeing positive
outcomes.
Prosecutors—Issues and Challenges:
Driver is collateral consequences on
how cases are handled: e.g., guns, sex
offenders, INS/ICE, etc. * * *; there
may require more work and faith that
there is no manipulation of the process;
time constraints; figure out development
of plea policies: changing current
structure and format.
Administration—Benefits and Hooks:
Will help with resource management
(volume and speed can help with
spending more time on risk reduction);
system improvement including front
end to enhance risk reduction such as
preventative services with juvenile and
families.
Administration—Issues and
Challenges: Alignment of all the
organizational policies, resources,
evaluations * * *; need to realize that
EBP is not only for the adult system but
has spillover to all components of the
criminal justice system.
Identifying Strategies for NIC:
(Meeting Objective 8) After reviewing
the benefits and challenges, participants
developed potential strategies to achieve
project goals.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Note: The following list represents a full
menu of proposed strategies. Not all of which
were adopted in the current Request for
Proposals.
Strategies to Use EBP to Reduce Risk:
Find a pilot site or demonstration
sites to make the case for using EBP
system-wide; need to be selected for
success not failure; need leadership and
commitment; need to take risk; all
stakeholders should be at the same level
of understanding; there should not be
conflicting understanding, mixed
messages and agendas (consensus
amongst the participants);
understanding that EBP is dynamic and
needs learning environment.
Work with the National District
Attorneys’ Association and state
prosecutors’ associations at their
training conferences; put together
training packages; train trainers
(prosecutors) at the various conferences
with intent that demand for such
training will spread to local
jurisdictions; need to show results to
convince prosecutors that this is in their
best interest.
National Conference of State
Legislatures’ conference and other key
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Feb 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
national conferences, e.g., the
Conference of State Chief Justices; work
with pretrial services and court
administrators networks and
associations; develop linkages to judges’
associations for information sharing and
raising awareness and interest.
Develop road show and information
packets that can be done whenever the
opportunities arise and need to carefully
define public safety in terms of offender
behavior change or reduction of risk to
re offend.
Funding by NIC of a major process
and outcome evaluation so eventually a
compelling case can be made. Does EBP
decision making save money and
achieve better outcomes?
Target local public safety/criminal
justice coordinating counsels to
function as organizational models to
introduce EBP.
Include governors, (National
Governor’s Association), Public
Defender Association, American Bar
Association.
Develop a framework for integrating
and implementing EBP—a criminal
justice systems approach. The
framework paper would define the
mission, goals and approach; identify
the issues that need to be addressed
from the perspective of different
stakeholders; define terms; define roles
of stakeholders, and so forth. EBP helps
frame what to do; the principles of EBP
will need to relate to the operational
level (all the players need to know what
to do and what it would look like for
them).
Articulate the vision and core
message of the project (something to
rally behind).
Have outside experts come to local
jurisdictions to do an analysis (not an
evaluation) of the local system. (Don’t
start with locations that are
dysfunctional.)
Build a national consensus on EBP
and sentencing.
National symposium. Co-sponsorship
by PEW, NIJ, NIC, JEHT * * * et al, to
build sense of excitement and
momentum, tying to reentry and jail
overcrowding (target real issues and
concerns that need new and effective
direction). Provide opportunities to
individuals and jurisdictions that have
not had exposure to EBP and case
decision making or collective
policymaking. ‘‘Even just discussions
can lead to positive change * * *’’.
Develop core principles for systems
change. Insist that everything is done as
a team modeling the continuum of EBP.
Tying this initiative to Re-entry: starts
at charging and providing offenders a
way to successfully re-enter society.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9833
Prioritize the work with pretrial and
corrections/probation agencies. These
are the agencies that have the data and
can operationalize and demonstrate how
things work. These agencies can act as
system pioneers. Judges can use the
information and bring along other key
players such as prosecutors.
Give judges concrete data on effective
interventions and practices. Provide
structure for judges to use data on
individual offender.
Needs to be national salesperson for
each of the system components who can
market and teach practitioners about
EBP and decision making.
Dated: February 14, 2008.
Thomas J. Beauclair,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. E8–3264 Filed 2–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–36–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,017]
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, KimberlyClark Global Sales, Incorporated, a
Wholly Owned Subsidiary of KimberlyClark Corporation Including On-Site
Leased Workers From Hewlett
Packard, Neenah, WI; Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on September 26, 2006,
applicable to workers of Kimberly-Clark
Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global
Sales, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Neenah,
Wisconsin. The notice was published in
the Federal Register on October 16,
2006 (71 FR 60762).
At the request of a petitioner, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers were engaged in support
activities for affiliated plants engaged in
the production of disposable diapers,
pull-ups and wipes.
New information shows that leased
workers of Hewlett Packard were
employed on-site at the Neenah,
Wisconsin location of Kimberly-Clark
Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
9834
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Notices
Sales, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
of Kimberly-Clark Corporation. The
Department has determined that these
workers were sufficiently under the
control of Kimberly-Clark Corporation,
Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of KimberlyClark Corporation to be considered
leased workers.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include leased workers
of Hewlett Packard working on-site at
the Neenah, Wisconsin location of the
subject firm.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers
employed at Kimberly-Clark
Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global
Sales, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Neenah,
Wisconsin, who were adverselyimpacted by a shift in production of
disposable diapers, pull-ups and wipes
to Mexico.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–60,017 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Kimberly-Clark Corporation,
Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Incorporated, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark
Corporation, including on-site leased workers
of Hewlett Packard, Neenah, Wisconsin, who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after September 6, 2005
through September 26, 2008, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under section
223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also
eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
February 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–3216 Filed 2–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Feb 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
period of February 4 through February
8, 2008.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of section 222(a)
of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 36 (Friday, February 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9833-9834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3216]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-60,017]
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global Sales,
Incorporated, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Including On-Site Leased Workers From Hewlett Packard, Neenah, WI;
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on September 26, 2006, applicable to workers of
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Inc., a wholly
owned subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Neenah, Wisconsin. The
notice was published in the Federal Register on October 16, 2006 (71 FR
60762).
At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged
in support activities for affiliated plants engaged in the production
of disposable diapers, pull-ups and wipes.
New information shows that leased workers of Hewlett Packard were
employed on-site at the Neenah, Wisconsin location of Kimberly-Clark
Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global
[[Page 9834]]
Sales, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark Corporation.
The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently
under the control of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global
Sales, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark Corporation to
be considered leased workers.
Based on these findings, the Department is amending this
certification to include leased workers of Hewlett Packard working on-
site at the Neenah, Wisconsin location of the subject firm.
The intent of the Department's certification is to include all
workers employed at Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global
Sales, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark Corporation,
Neenah, Wisconsin, who were adversely-impacted by a shift in production
of disposable diapers, pull-ups and wipes to Mexico.
The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,017 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global
Sales, Incorporated, a wholly owned subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark
Corporation, including on-site leased workers of Hewlett Packard,
Neenah, Wisconsin, who became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after September 6, 2005 through September 26, 2008,
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of February 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-3216 Filed 2-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
