Persulfates From China, 8903-8904 [E8-2848]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Notices
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
gathered in the final phase of these
investigations available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the
investigations, provided that the
application is made no later than 21
days prior to the hearing date specified
in this notice. Authorized applicants
must represent interested parties, as
defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are
parties to the investigations. A party
granted access to BPI in the preliminary
phase of the investigations need not
reapply for such access. A separate
service list will be maintained by the
Secretary for those parties authorized to
receive BPI under the APO.
Staff report.—The prehearing staff
report in the final phase of these
investigations will be placed in the
nonpublic record on June 2, 2008, and
a public version will be issued
thereafter, pursuant to section 207.22 of
the Commission’s rules.
Hearing.—The Commission will hold
a hearing in connection with the final
phase of these investigations beginning
at 9:30 a.m. on June 17, 2008, at the U.S.
International Trade Commission
Building. Requests to appear at the
hearing should be filed in writing with
the Secretary to the Commission on or
before June 11, 2008. A nonparty who
has testimony that may aid the
Commission’s deliberations may request
permission to present a short statement
at the hearing. All parties and
nonparties desiring to appear at the
hearing and make oral presentations
should attend a prehearing conference
to be held at 9:30 a.m. on June 13, 2008,
at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building. Oral testimony
and written materials to be submitted at
the public hearing are governed by
sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and
207.24 of the Commission’s rules.
Parties must submit any request to
present a portion of their hearing
testimony in camera no later than 7
business days prior to the date of the
hearing.
Written submissions.—Each party
who is an interested party shall submit
a prehearing brief to the Commission.
Prehearing briefs must conform with the
provisions of section 207.23 of the
Commission’s rules; the deadline for
filing is June 10, 2008. Parties may also
file written testimony in connection
with their presentation at the hearing, as
provided in section 207.24 of the
Commission’s rules, and posthearing
briefs, which must conform with the
provisions of section 207.25 of the
Commission’s rules. The deadline for
filing posthearing briefs is June 24,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Feb 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
2008; witness testimony must be filed
no later than three days before the
hearing. In addition, any person who
has not entered an appearance as a party
to the investigations may submit a
written statement of information
pertinent to the subject of the
investigations, including statements of
support or opposition to the petition, on
or before June 24, 2008. On July 11,
2008, the Commission will make
available to parties all information on
which they have not had an opportunity
to comment. Parties may submit final
comments on this information on or
before July 15, 2008, but such final
comments must not contain new factual
information and must otherwise comply
with section 207.30 of the Commission’s
rules. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of section
201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any
submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
rules do not authorize filing of
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67
Fed. Reg. 68036 (November 8, 2002).
Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II(C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173
(November 8, 2002).
Additional written submissions to the
Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, shall not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such submissions, or unless
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
investigations must be served on all
other parties to the investigations (as
identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Authority: These investigations are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8903
Issued: February 11, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–2843 Filed 2–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–749 (Second
Review)]
Persulfates From China
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping
duty order on persulfates from China.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on persulfates from China
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury within
a reasonably foreseeable time. For
further information concerning the
conduct of this review and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
February 4, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Cassise (202–708–5408),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On February 4, 2008,
the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party response to its
notice of institution (72 FR 61907,
November 1, 2007) was adequate and
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
8904
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Notices
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on
March 3, 2008, and made available to
persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this
review. A public version will be issued
thereafter, pursuant to section
207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before March
6, 2008, and may not contain new
factual information. Any person that is
neither a party to the five-year review
nor an interested party may submit a
brief written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the review by March 6,
2008. However, should Commerce
extend the time limit for its completion
of the final results of its review, the
deadline for comments (which may not
contain new factual information) on
Commerce’s final results is three
business days after the issuance of
Commerce’s results. If comments
contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the response
submitted by FMC Corporation to be individually
adequate. Comments from other interested parties
will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Feb 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 11, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–2848 Filed 2–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Settlement Agreement Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA)
Notice is hereby given that on January
25, 2008, a proposed Settlement
Agreement regarding the Butte Mine
Flooding Superfund Site, also knows as
the Berkley Pit Site, was filed with the
United States District Court of Montana
in United States v. Atlantic Richfield,
Civ. Action No. 02–35–BU–SEH (D.
Mont.) The proposed Settlement
Agreement, which was approved by the
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas, pertains primarily to
ASARCO’s liability at this site under a
consent decree previously entered by
the United States District Court in
Montana on August 14, 2002. The terms
of the Settlement Agreement require an
additional approval by the United States
District Court in Montana, following a
period of public comment, for the
Settlement Agreement to become
effective.
The proposed Settlement Agreement
reflects an agreement among ASARCO,
the United States, the State of Montana,
and another defendant at the Butte Mine
Flooding Site—Montana Resources
Incorporated (‘‘MRI’’). Under the terms
of the Agreement, MRI will receive an
allowed general unsecured claim against
ASARCO of $8.67 million, which MRI
can use only toward cleanup of the
Butte Mine Flooding Site, which is
proceeding under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(‘‘CERCLA’’), as amended, 42 U.S.C.
9601–9675. MRI is also allowed other
claims relating to the Butte Mine
Flooding Site under the Settlement
Agreement. In exchange for MRI’s
allowed claims, the obligations of
ASARCO and its subsidiary, AR
Montana, under the Butte Mine
Flooding Consent Decree will be
deemed to be fully resolved and
satisfied, and ASARCO will be removed
as a party to the decree, subject to
certain conditions set forth in the
Settlement Agreement.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Department of Justice will receive
comments relating to the proposed
Agreement for a period of thirty (30)
days from the date of this publication.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either emailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. Atlantic Richfield, DJ Ref. No.
90–11–2–430.
The proposed Agreement may be
examined at the office of the United
States Attorney for the District of
Montana, 2929 Third Avenue North,
Suite 400, Billings, Montana 59101, and
at the U.S. EPA Region VIII Montana
Office, Federal Building, 10 West 15th
Street, Suite 3200, Helena, Montana
59624. During the public comment
period, the proposed Agreement may
also be examined on the following
Department of Justice Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. In addition, a
copy of the proposed Agreement may be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please enclose a check in the amount of
$5.00 (25 cents per page reproduction
costs) payable to the U.S. Treasury.
W. Benjamin Fisherow,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 08–670 Filed 2–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
Decree
In accordance with the Departmental
Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. David Arp and Triple
Diamond Enterprises, LLC, (M.D. Fla.;
2:08–cv–82–JES–DNF), DJ # 90–5–1–1–
17895, was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Middle
District of Florida on January 31, 2008.
This proposed Consent Decree
concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against David Arp and
Triple Diamond Enterprises, LLC,
pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 403, 1311(a) and
1344, to obtain injunctive relief from
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 32 (Friday, February 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8903-8904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2848]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-749 (Second Review)]
Persulfates From China
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited five-year review concerning the
antidumping duty order on persulfates from China.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an
expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation
of the antidumping duty order on persulfates from China would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the
conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19
CFR part 207).
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 4, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Cassise (202-708-5408),
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On February 4, 2008, the Commission determined that
the domestic interested party response to its notice of institution (72
FR 61907, November 1, 2007) was adequate and the respondent interested
party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any
other circumstances that would warrant
[[Page 8904]]
conducting a full review.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission determined
that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3)
of the Act.
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on
March 3, 2008, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's
rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the review
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are
due on or before March 6, 2008, and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review
nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review
by March 6, 2008. However, should Commerce extend the time limit for
its completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce's
final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce's
results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI),
they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and
207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or
electronic means.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
\2\ The Commission has found the response submitted by FMC
Corporation to be individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 11, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-2848 Filed 2-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P