Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements; Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, 7627-7628 [E8-2374]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices
the Internet at the Web address in the
ADDRESSES section.
Privacy Act: Using the search function
of our docket Web site, anyone can find
and read the comments received into
any of our dockets. This includes the
name of the individual sending the
comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union). You
may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
www.regulations.gov.
Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive
on or before the closing the date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change this proposal because of the
comments we receive.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Proprietary or Confidential Business
Information
Do not file in the docket information
that you consider to be proprietary or
confidential business information. Send
or deliver this information directly to
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document. You must mark the
information that you consider
proprietary or confidential. If you send
the information on a disk or CD–ROM,
mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM
and also identify electronically within
the disk or CD–ROM the specific
information that is proprietary or
confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35 (b), when we are
aware or proprietary information filed
with a comment, we do not place it in
the docket. We hold it in a separate file
to which the public does not have
access and place a note in the docket
that we have received it. If we receive
a request to examine or copy this
information, we treat it as any other
request under the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). We
process such a request under the DOT
procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
Availability of Documents
You can get an electronic copy using
the Internet by:
(1) Searching the Federal
eRulemaking portal (https://
www.regulations.gov/search);
(2) Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies Web page at (https://www.faa/
gov/regulations_policies); or
(3) Accessing the Government
Printing Office’s Web page at https://
www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/
aces140.html.
You can also get a copy by sending a
request to the Federal Aviation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
Administration, Office of Rulemaking,
ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by
calling (202) 267–9680. Make sure to
identity the docket number, notice
number, or amendment number of this
proceeding.
Authority for This Proceeding
This notice is published under the
authority described in Subtitle VII, Part
B, Chapter 471, Section 47129 of Title
49 United States Code. Under
subsection (b) of this section, the
Secretary of Transportation is required
to publish publishing policy statements
establishing standards or guidelines the
Secretary will use in determining the
reasonableness of airport fees charged to
airlines under Section 47129.
Background
On January 17, 2008, the Department
of the FAA issued Notice of proposed
amendment to the Policy Regarding the
Establishment of Airport Rates and
Charges Docket No. FAA–2008–0036,
(73 FR 3310). Comments to that
document were to be received on or
before March 3, 2008.
By a letter dated January 30, 2008 the
Air Transport Association of America,
Inc. (ATA), the Cargo Airline
Association (CAA), the National Air
Carrier Association (NACA), and the
Regional Airline Association (RAA), on
behalf of their members, requested that
the comment period for Docket 2008–
0036 be extended until April 3, 2008.
Industry trade groups expressed concern
that critical pieces of information were
missing from the January 17, 2008,
notice that are essential to a full
assessment of the impact of the
proposed policy. The following
information has been added to the
docket: the list of secondary airports
eligible for inclusion in the rate base
(FAA Docket 2008–0036.0007.1); the list
of congested airports (based on 1% of
delays) (FAA Docket 2008–0036–
0008.1); the list of airports from the
Benchmark report (FAA Docket 2008–
0036–0009.1). ATA, CAA, NACA and
RAA requested an extension of the
comment period by 30 days to provide
sufficient time to more fully develop
comments reflecting the views of the
industry stakeholders.
The Department and the FAA concur
with the petitioners’ requests for an
extension of the comment period on
FAA Docket 2008–0036 and believe an
additional 30 days should be adequate
to provide more complete and
meaningful comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7627
Extension of Comment Period
In accordance with § 11.47(c) of title
14, Code of Federal Regulations, the
Department of the FAA have reviewed
the petitions made by the Air Transport
Association of America, Inc. (ATA), the
Cargo Airline Association (CAA), the
National Air Carrier Association
(NACA), and the Regional Airline
Association (RAA), on behalf of their
members, for extension of the comment
period to FAA Docket 2008–0036. These
petitioners have shown a substantive
interest in the proposed amendment to
the 1996 Policy Regarding Airport Rates
and Charges and good cause for the
extension. The Department and the FAA
have determined that extension of the
comment period is consistent with the
public interest, and that good cause
exists for taking this action.
Accordingly, the comment period for
FAA Docket 2008–0036 is extended
until April 3, 2008.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 5,
2008.
Rebecca MacPherson,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations,
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 08–573 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collections
and their expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on November 28,
2007 (72 FR 67346–67347).
Comments must be submitted on
or before March 10, 2008.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Stevens, NHTSA, NVS–223,
Washington, DC 20590, phone 202–366–
5308.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
7628
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Title: 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for
Inconsequential Defect or
Noncompliance.
OMB Number: 2127—0045.
Type of Request: Reinstatement,
without change, of a previously
approved collection which has expired.
Abstract: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration’s statute at
49 U.S.C. 30118, Notification of Defects
and Noncompliance, and 49 U.S.C.
30120, Remedies for Defects and
Noncompliance, generally requires
manufacturers of motor vehicles and
items of replacement equipment to
conduct a notification and remedy
campaign (recall) when their products
are determined to contain a safetyrelated defect or a noncompliance with
a Federal motor vehicle safety standard
(FMVSS). Those sections require a
manufacturer of motor vehicles or motor
vehicle equipment to notify distributors,
dealers, and purchasers if any of the
manufacturer’s products are determined
to either contain a safety-related defect
or fail to comply with an applicable
FMVSS. The manufacturer is under a
concomitant obligation to remedy such
defect or noncompliance. Pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h),
Exemptions, a manufacturer may seek
an exemption from these notification
and remedy requirements on the basis
that the defect or noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety. NHTSA exercised this
statutory authority to excuse
inconsequential defects or
noncompliances when it promulgated
49 CFR part 566, Exemption for
Inconsequential Defect or
Noncompliance. This regulation
establishes the procedures for
manufacturers to submit exemption
petitions to the agency and the
procedures the agency will use in
evaluating those petitions. Part 556
allows the agency to ensure that
inconsequentiality petitions are both
properly substantiated and efficiently
processed.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit entities.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 200.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30
days, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725–17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Comments Are Invited On: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Issued on: February 5, 2008.
Daniel C. Smith,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8–2374 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket Number PHMSA–2007–28119;
Notice No. 07–9]
Proposed Recommended Practices for
Bulk Loading and Unloading of
Hazardous Materials in Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA).
ACTION: Notice; request for comments;
extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: PHMSA is extending until
March 14, 2008, the period for
interested persons to submit comments
on the agency’s January 4, 2008 notice
concerning proposed recommended
practices for bulk loading and unloading
of hazardous materials. The January 4,
2008 notice summarizes incident data
related to bulk loading and unloading
operations; discusses recommendations
issued by the National Transportation
Safety Board and the Chemical Safety
and Hazard Investigation Board;
provides an overview of current Federal
regulations applicable to bulk loading
and unloading operations; summarizes
the results of a public workshop
PHMSA hosted last year; and sets forth
proposed recommended practices for
bulk loading and unloading operations.
Based on information and comments
received, we plan to consider strategies
for enhancing the safety of bulk loading
and unloading operations, including
whether additional regulatory
requirements may be necessary.
DATES: Submit comments by March 14,
2008. To the extent possible, we will
consider comments received after this
date and consider strategies including
additional regulatory requirements, as
necessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
You may submit comments
identified by the docket number
PHMSA–2007–28119; Notice No. 07–9
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, Routing Symbol M–30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
• Hand Delivery: To Docket
Operations, Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice at the beginning
of the comment. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to the docket management system,
including any personal information
provided.
Docket: For access to the dockets to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or https://
dms.dot.gov (until December 31, 2007)
or DOT’s Docket Operations Office (see
ADDRESSES).
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477) or you may visit https://
www.regulations.gov.
ADDRESSES:
Rick
Boyle, Office of Hazardous Materials
Technology, (202) 366–4545 or Kurt
Eichenlaub, Office of Hazardous
Materials Standards, (202) 366–8553,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 4, 2008, the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA, we) published
a notice (No. 07–9) under Docket
PHMSA–2007–28119 soliciting
information and comments on proposed
recommended practices for loading and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7627-7628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2374]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collections and their expected
burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period was
published on November 28, 2007 (72 FR 67346-67347).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 10, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Stevens, NHTSA, NVS-223,
Washington, DC 20590, phone 202-366-5308.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 7628]]
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Title: 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or
Noncompliance.
OMB Number: 2127--0045.
Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously
approved collection which has expired.
Abstract: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's
statute at 49 U.S.C. 30118, Notification of Defects and Noncompliance,
and 49 U.S.C. 30120, Remedies for Defects and Noncompliance, generally
requires manufacturers of motor vehicles and items of replacement
equipment to conduct a notification and remedy campaign (recall) when
their products are determined to contain a safety-related defect or a
noncompliance with a Federal motor vehicle safety standard (FMVSS).
Those sections require a manufacturer of motor vehicles or motor
vehicle equipment to notify distributors, dealers, and purchasers if
any of the manufacturer's products are determined to either contain a
safety-related defect or fail to comply with an applicable FMVSS. The
manufacturer is under a concomitant obligation to remedy such defect or
noncompliance. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h), Exemptions,
a manufacturer may seek an exemption from these notification and remedy
requirements on the basis that the defect or noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. NHTSA exercised
this statutory authority to excuse inconsequential defects or
noncompliances when it promulgated 49 CFR part 566, Exemption for
Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance. This regulation establishes
the procedures for manufacturers to submit exemption petitions to the
agency and the procedures the agency will use in evaluating those
petitions. Part 556 allows the agency to ensure that inconsequentiality
petitions are both properly substantiated and efficiently processed.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit entities.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 200.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Comments Are Invited On: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
Issued on: February 5, 2008.
Daniel C. Smith,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8-2374 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
