Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request, 7607 [E8-2368]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices
‘‘the court is only authorized to review
the decree itself,’’ and not to ‘‘effectively
redraft the complaint’’ to inquire into
other matters that the United States did
not pursue. Id. at 1459–60. As this court
recently confirmed in SBC
Communications, courts ‘‘cannot look
beyond the complaint in making the
public interest detennination unless the
complaint is drafted so narrowly as to
make a mockery of judicial power.’’ SBC
Commc’ns, 489 F. Supp. 2d at 15.
In its 2004 amendments, Congress
made dear its intent to preserve the
practical benefits of utilizing consent
decrees in antitrust enforcement, adding
the unambiguous instruction that
‘‘[n]othing in this section shall be
construed to require the court to
conduct an evidentiary hearing or to
require the court to permit anyone to
intervene.’’ 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(2). The
language wrote into the statute what
Congress intended when it enacted the
Tunney Act in 1974, as Senator Tunney
explained: ‘‘[t]he court is nowhere
compelled to go to trial or to engage in
extended proceedings which might have
the effect of vitiating the benefits of
prompt and less costly settlement
through the consent decree process.’’
119 Cong. Rec. 24,598 (1973) (statement
of Senator Tunney). Rather, the
procedure for the public interest
determination is left to the discretion of
the court, with the recognition that the
court’s ‘‘scope of review remains
sharply proscribed by precedent and the
nature of Tunney Act proceedings.’’
SBC Commc’ns, 489 F. Supp. 2d at 11.4
VIII. Determinative Documents
There are no determinative materials
or documents within the meaning of the
APPA that were considered by the
United States in formulating the
proposed Final Judgment.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Dated: January 24, 2008.
Respectfully submitted,
llll/s/llll
Damon J. Kalt
Sanford M. Adler
4 See United States v. Enova Corp., 107 F. Supp.
2d 10, 17 (D.D.C. 2000) (noting that the ‘‘Tunney
Act expressly allows the court to make its public
interest determination on the basis of the
competitive impact statement and response to
comments alone’’); S. Rep. No. 93–298, 93d Cong.,
1st Sess., at 6 (1973) (‘‘Where the public interest can
be meaningfully evaluated simply on the basis of
briefs and oral arguments, that is the approach that
should be utilized.’’); United States v. Mid-Am.
Dairymen, Inc., 1977–1 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 61,508,
at 71,980 (W.D. Mo. 1977) (‘‘Absent a showing of
corrupt failure of the government to discharge its
duty, the Court, in making its public interest
finding, should * * * carefully consider the
explanations of the government in the competitive
impact statement and its responses to comments in
order to determine whether those explanations are
reasonable under the circumstances.’’).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
John C. Filippini (D.C. Bar # 165159)
Danielle M. Ganzi
Attorneys, United States Department of
Justice, Antitrust Division, Networks and
Technology Enforcement Section, 600 E
Street, NW., Suite 9500, Washington, DC
20530, (202) 307–6200.
[FR Doc. 08–532 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
February 5, 2008
The Department of Labor (DOL)
hereby announces the submission of the
following public information collection
request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
A copy of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation; including
among other things a description of the
likely respondents, proposed frequency
of response, and estimated total burden
may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov
Web site at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain or by contacting
Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is
not a toll-free number) / e-mail:
king.darrin@dol.gov.
Interested parties are encouraged to
send comments to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: Bridget Dooling, OMB Desk
Officer for the Employment Standards
Administration (ESA), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, Telephone:
202–395–7316 / Fax: 202–395–6974
(these are not toll-free numbers), E-mail:
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register. In order to
ensure the appropriate consideration,
comments should reference the OMB
Control Number (see below).
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7607
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Employment Standards
Administration
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection
Title: Pre-Hearing Statement
OMB Control Number: 1215–0085
Form Number: LS–18
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,400
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 918
Total Estimated Cost Burden: $2,376
Affected Public: Individuals or
households
Description: The Form LS–18 is used
to refer cases to the Department’s Office
of Administrative Law Judges for formal
hearing under the Longshore and Harbor
Workers’ Compensation Act [33 U.S. C.
901].
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–2368 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–CF–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics (STEM) Opportunities in
the Workforce System Initiative;
Solicitation for Grant Applications
(SGA) SGA/DFA PY 07–03, Amendment
Number 1
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Employment and
Training Administration published a
document in the Federal Register of
January 15, 2008, announcing the
availability of funds and solicitation for
grant applications for the Science,
Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics (STEM) Opportunities in
the Workforce System Initiative. This
amendment will make changes to the
January 15 document by clarifying and
correcting this Solicitation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marsha Daniels, Grants Management
Specialist, Telephone (202) 693–3504.
Amendment
In the Federal Register of January 15,
2008, in FR Volume 73, Number 10, the
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2368]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request
February 5, 2008
The Department of Labor (DOL) hereby announces the submission of
the following public information collection request (ICR) to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). A copy of this ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation; including among other things a description of the likely
respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden
may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Web site at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain or by contacting Darrin King on 202-
693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number) / e-mail:
king.darrin@dol.gov.
Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: Bridget Dooling, OMB Desk
Officer for the Employment Standards Administration (ESA), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Telephone:
202-395-7316 / Fax: 202-395-6974 (these are not toll-free numbers), E-
mail: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov within 30 days from the date of this
publication in the Federal Register. In order to ensure the appropriate
consideration, comments should reference the OMB Control Number (see
below).
The OMB is particularly interested in comments which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Agency: Employment Standards Administration
Type of Review: Extension without change of currently approved
collection
Title: Pre-Hearing Statement
OMB Control Number: 1215-0085
Form Number: LS-18
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,400
Total Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 918
Total Estimated Cost Burden: $2,376
Affected Public: Individuals or households
Description: The Form LS-18 is used to refer cases to the
Department's Office of Administrative Law Judges for formal hearing
under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act [33 U.S. C.
901].
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-2368 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-CF-P