Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Regarding a Proposed Combination Between the Montréal Exchange Inc. and TSX Group Inc., 7617-7619 [E8-2329]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–57263; File No. SR–Phlx–
2007–91]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc;
Order Approving a Proposed Rule
Change to Require a Non-Streaming
Quote Trader Registered Option
Traders (‘‘non-SQT ROT’’) to Submit a
List of Options for Intended
Assignment
February 4, 2008.
On December 12, 2007, the
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’)1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(C) to
require ‘‘non-SQT ROTs’’ (as defined
below) to submit to the Exchange a list
of the options in which such non-SQT
ROT intends to be assigned to make
markets. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on December 31, 2007.3 The
Commission received no comments on
the proposal.
PHLX proposes to amend Exchange
Rule 1014(b)(ii)(C) to require ‘‘non-SQT
ROTs’’ 4 to notify the Exchange of each
option, on an issue-by-issue basis, it
intends to be assigned to make markets.
Such notification would need to be
made in writing on a form prescribed by
the Exchange (an ‘‘ROT Assignment
Form’’). Any change to the ROT
Assignment Form would have to be
made in writing by the non-SQT ROT
prior to the end of the trading session
in which the change is to take place.
Receipt of the properly completed ROT
Assignment Form from a qualified nonSQT ROT applicant would constitute
acceptance by the Exchange of the nonSQT ROT’s assignment in, or
termination of assignment in (as
indicated on the ROT Assignment
Form), the options listed on such ROT
Assignment Form. If a non-SQT ROT
applicant failed to qualify as an ROT on
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57034
(December 21, 2007), 72 FR 74398.
4 A Streaming Quote Trader (‘‘SQT’’) is a
Registered Options Trader (‘‘ROT’’) that has
received permission from the Exchange to generate
and submit electronic option quotations
electronically via an Exchange approved quoting
device. See Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A). Non-SQT
ROTs do not stream electronic quotations but make
verbal markets upon request and have the ability to
send limit orders to the limit order book via
electronic interface with Phlx XL.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
2 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
the Exchange, such assignments would
be rendered ineffective and would be
terminated. The proposed rule change is
designed to facilitate the Exchange’s
ability to track the activities of non-SQT
ROTs.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.5 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with section
6(b)(5) of the Act,6 which requires,
among other things, that the Exchange’s
rules be designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Commission
believes that the proposed notification
requirement will assist the Exchange in
monitoring the activities of non-SQT
ROTs and should contribute to the
Exchange’s efforts to enhance the fair
and orderly operation of the Exchange’s
market.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,7 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
Phlx–2007–91) hereby is approved.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
For the Commission, by the Division
of Trading and Markets, pursuant to
delegated authority.8
[FR Doc. E8–2346 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–57260; File No. SR–BSE–
2008–06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston
Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Regarding a
Proposed Combination Between the
´
Montreal Exchange Inc. and TSX
Group Inc.
February 1, 2008
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
5 In approving this proposal, the Commission
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7617
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
29, 2008, the Boston Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘BSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by BSE. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder,4 which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is submitting the
proposed rule change to the
Commission to amend the Fifth
Amended and Restated Operating
Agreement, dated January 26, 2005, as
may be amended from time to time
(‘‘BOX LLC Agreement’’), of the Boston
Options Exchange Group LLC (‘‘BOX
LLC’’), in connection with the proposed
business combination (the
´
‘‘Combination’’) of the Montreal
Exchange Inc.,5 a company incorporated
´
in Quebec, Canada (‘‘MX’’), and TSX
Group Inc., a company incorporated in
Ontario, Canada (‘‘TSX Group’’). The
text of the rule proposal, including the
proposed Instrument of Accession, is
available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.bostonstock.com), at the
Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, BSE
included statements concerning the
purpose of and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. BSE has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
5 The Montreal Exchange Inc. is also known in
´
´
French as the Bourse de Montreal Inc.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
7618
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
1. Purpose
On January 13, 2004, the Commission
approved four BSE proposals that
together established, through an
operating agreement among its owners,
a Delaware limited liability company,
BOX LLC, to operate BOX as an options
trading facility of the Exchange.6
Currently, MX U.S. 2, Inc., a wholly
owned U.S. subsidiary of MX (‘‘MX
US’’), owns a 31.4% ownership interest
in BOX LLC.
The Exchange is submitting the
proposed rule change to the
Commission to amend the BOX LLC
Agreement pursuant to the proposed
Instrument of Accession in connection
with the Combination of MX, the largest
derivatives exchange in Canada, and
TSX Group, which, among other things,
owns Canada’s pre-eminent equity
market. As a result of the Combination,
MX will become a direct 7 subsidiary of
TSX Group, a publicly traded Ontario
corporation.8
The Combination will be effected
through a series of amalgamations 9
involving intermediate holding
companies, which will cease to exist
following completion of the
Combination. As a result of these
transactions, MX will be amalgamated
with a direct subsidiary of TSX Group.
The amalgamated company also will be
´
named Montreal Exchange Inc. and will
´
be a Quebec corporation. Consequently,
MX U.S. (including MX US’s 31.4%
ownership interest in BOX LLC) will
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 49066
(January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2773 (January 20, 2004)
(establishing a fee schedule for the proposed BOX
facility); 49065 (January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2768
(January 20, 2004) (creating Boston Options
Exchange Regulation LLC to which the BSE would
delegate its self-regulatory functions with respect to
the BOX facility); 49068 (January 13, 2004), 69 FR
2775 (January 20, 2004) (approving trading rules for
the BOX facility); and 49067 (January 13, 2004), 69
FR 2761 (January 20, 2004) (approving certain
regulatory provisions of the operating agreement of
BOX LLC).
7 Certain non-voting preference shares of MX will
be owned by TSX Inc., a direct, wholly owned
subsidiary of TSX Group. The share interests of
TSX Group and TSX Inc. will together represent the
entire ownership interest, voting and non-voting, in
MX.
8 At its next shareholders’ meeting after the
effective date of the Combination, TSX Group will
propose changing its name to TMX Group Inc.
9 The term ‘‘amalgamation’’ refers to the
combination of two or more business entities into
a single entity pursuant to which the combined
entity becomes the successor in interest, by
operation of law, to the rights and obligations of the
combining entities. Amalgamations are commonly
used in Canada to effect business combinations and
are similar to mergers in the United States.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
become an indirect, wholly owned
subsidiary of TSX Group. The
Combination is subject to the approval
´
´
of the Autorite des marches financiers
(the securities regulator for the province
´
of Quebec, Canada) and the
shareholders of MX, as well as other
regulatory approvals.
Following the Combination, MX, MX
US, and TSX Group will continue to
operate their respective businesses in
substantially the same manner as they
had prior to the Combination, and MX
and MX US senior management will
remain under the stewardship of MX’s
current chief executive officer.10
Additionally, the operations of each of
MX and TSX Group will continue to be
located in the same province in which
it is currently located, and each will
remain subject to its existing regulatory
framework and oversight. Consequently,
MX US’s management of its ownership
interest in BOX shall remain essentially
unaffected by the Combination.
Pursuant to Section 8.4(g) of the BOX
LLC Agreement, BOX LLC is required to
amend the BOX LLC Agreement to make
an Acquirer 11 a party to the LLC
Agreement if such Acquirer acquires a
Controlling Interest 12 in a BOX Member
who holds a percentage interest in BOX
LLC equal to or greater than 20%.
Therefore, since TSX Group is acquiring
a Controlling Interest in MX, whose
wholly owned subsidiary, MX US, owns
a 31.4% ownership interest in BOX
LLC, TSX Group, as an Acquirer, is
required to and will become a party to
the BOX LLC Agreement pursuant to the
proposed Instrument of Accession. As a
result, TSX Group will agree to abide by
all the provisions of the BOX LLC
Agreement, including those provisions
requiring submission to the jurisdiction
of the Commission.13
10 Organizational changes contemplated in
connection with the Combination are described in
the TSX Group registration statement separately
filed with the Commission regarding the issuance
of shares in connection with the Combination.
11 An ‘‘Acquirer’’ is defined as ‘‘a Person who,
alone or together with any Affiliate of such Person,
acquires a controlling interest in a Member.’’ See
BOX LLC Agreement, Section 8.4(g)(ii).
12 A ‘‘Controlling Interest’’ is defined as ‘‘the
ownership by any Person, alone or together with
any Affiliate of such Person, of a 25% or greater
interest in a Member.’’ See BOX LLC Agreement,
Section 8.4(g)(i).
13 The BOX LLC Agreement states, in part, that
‘‘the Members, officers, directors, agents, and
employees of Members irrevocably submit to the
exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. federal courts,
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and the
Boston Stock Exchange, for the purposes of any
suit, action or proceeding pursuant to U.S. federal
securities laws, the rules or regulations thereunder,
arising out of, or relating to, BOX activities or
Article 19.6(a), (except that such jurisdictions shall
also include Delaware for any such matter relating
to the organization or internal affairs of BOX,
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the reasons stated above, BSE is
submitting to the Commission the
proposed Instrument of Accession,
which constitutes an amendment to the
BOX LLC Agreement, as a rule change.
The proposed rule change is subject to
becoming effective and operative
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 14 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 15
thereunder. BSE proposes to make this
proposal operative upon the
consummation of the Combination,
currently anticipated in late February
2008.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act,16 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(1),17 in
particular, in that it enables the
Exchange to be so organized so as to
have the capacity to be able to carry out
the purposes of the Act and to comply,
and to enforce compliance by its
exchange members and persons
associated with its exchange members,
with the provisions of the Act, the rules
and regulations thereunder, and the
rules of the Exchange.
The Exchange also believes that this
filing furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act 18 in that it is designed
to facilitate transactions in securities, to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that
the provisions of the BOX LLC
Agreement, previously approved by the
Commission, provide a framework for
addressing the Combination.
Accordingly, BSE believes the
Combination does not present any novel
provided that such matter is not related to trading
on, or the regulation, of the BOX Market), and
hereby waive, and agree not to assert by way of
motion, as a defense or otherwise in any such suit,
action or proceeding, any claims that they are not
personally subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, that the suit,
action or proceeding is an inconvenient forum or
that the venue of the suit, action or proceeding is
improper, or that the subject matter hereof may not
be enforced in or by such courts or agency.’’ See
BOX LLC Agreement, Section 19.6.
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices
issues that have not been anticipated
and addressed by the BOX LLC
Agreement.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 19 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.20
Normally, a proposed rule change
filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 21 may not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of filing. However, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) 22 permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay. In its filing, the Exchange
requested waiver of the 30-day operative
delay because the MX shareholders are
expected to approve the Combination on
February 13, 2008 and subsequent
thereto the Combination is expected to
close in late February of 2008.
Furthermore, BSE believes the
Combination does not present any novel
issues that have not been anticipated
19 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a self-regulatory
organization submit to the Commission written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that BSE has
satisfied the five-day pre-filing notice requirement.
21 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
22 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
20 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
and addressed by the BOX LLC
Agreement.
The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because the proposed rule change will
allow the Exchange to proceed with the
Combination, without undue delay, in a
manner consistent with the provisions
of the BOX LLC Operating Agreement.
Accordingly, consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest, the Commission designates the
proposed rule change to be operative
upon consummation of the
Combination.23
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BSE–2008–06 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BSE–2008–06. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
23 For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7619
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of BSE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BSE–2008–06 and should
be submitted on or before February 29,
2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–2329 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–57261; File No. SR–CBOE–
2008–05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval
of Proposed Rule Change as Modified
by Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Allow
CBOE to List Up to Seven Expiration
Months for Reduced-Value and Jumbo
Options That Overlie Broad-Based
Security Indexes for Which Full-Value
Options are Used by CBOE To
Calculate a Constant Three-Month
Volatility Index
February 1, 2008.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
14, 2008, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated ( ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been
24 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7617-7619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2329]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-57260; File No. SR-BSE-2008-06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Regarding a Proposed Combination Between the Montr[eacute]al Exchange
Inc. and TSX Group Inc.
February 1, 2008
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 29, 2008, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by BSE. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is submitting the proposed rule change to the
Commission to amend the Fifth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement,
dated January 26, 2005, as may be amended from time to time (``BOX LLC
Agreement''), of the Boston Options Exchange Group LLC (``BOX LLC''),
in connection with the proposed business combination (the
``Combination'') of the Montr[eacute]al Exchange Inc.,\5\ a company
incorporated in Qu[eacute]bec, Canada (``MX''), and TSX Group Inc., a
company incorporated in Ontario, Canada (``TSX Group''). The text of
the rule proposal, including the proposed Instrument of Accession, is
available on the Exchange's Web site (https://www.bostonstock.com), at
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Montr[eacute]al Exchange Inc. is also known in French as
the Bourse de Montr[eacute]al Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, BSE included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. BSE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
[[Page 7618]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
On January 13, 2004, the Commission approved four BSE proposals
that together established, through an operating agreement among its
owners, a Delaware limited liability company, BOX LLC, to operate BOX
as an options trading facility of the Exchange.\6\ Currently, MX U.S.
2, Inc., a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of MX (``MX US''), owns a 31.4%
ownership interest in BOX LLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 49066 (January 13,
2004), 69 FR 2773 (January 20, 2004) (establishing a fee schedule
for the proposed BOX facility); 49065 (January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2768
(January 20, 2004) (creating Boston Options Exchange Regulation LLC
to which the BSE would delegate its self-regulatory functions with
respect to the BOX facility); 49068 (January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2775
(January 20, 2004) (approving trading rules for the BOX facility);
and 49067 (January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2761 (January 20, 2004)
(approving certain regulatory provisions of the operating agreement
of BOX LLC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is submitting the proposed rule change to the
Commission to amend the BOX LLC Agreement pursuant to the proposed
Instrument of Accession in connection with the Combination of MX, the
largest derivatives exchange in Canada, and TSX Group, which, among
other things, owns Canada's pre-eminent equity market. As a result of
the Combination, MX will become a direct \7\ subsidiary of TSX Group, a
publicly traded Ontario corporation.\8\
The Combination will be effected through a series of amalgamations
\9\ involving intermediate holding companies, which will cease to exist
following completion of the Combination. As a result of these
transactions, MX will be amalgamated with a direct subsidiary of TSX
Group. The amalgamated company also will be named Montr[eacute]al
Exchange Inc. and will be a Qu[eacute]bec corporation. Consequently, MX
U.S. (including MX US's 31.4% ownership interest in BOX LLC) will
become an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of TSX Group. The
Combination is subject to the approval of the Autorit[eacute] des
march[eacute]s financiers (the securities regulator for the province of
Qu[eacute]bec, Canada) and the shareholders of MX, as well as other
regulatory approvals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Certain non-voting preference shares of MX will be owned by
TSX Inc., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TSX Group. The share
interests of TSX Group and TSX Inc. will together represent the
entire ownership interest, voting and non-voting, in MX.
\8\ At its next shareholders' meeting after the effective date
of the Combination, TSX Group will propose changing its name to TMX
Group Inc.
\9\ The term ``amalgamation'' refers to the combination of two
or more business entities into a single entity pursuant to which the
combined entity becomes the successor in interest, by operation of
law, to the rights and obligations of the combining entities.
Amalgamations are commonly used in Canada to effect business
combinations and are similar to mergers in the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Following the Combination, MX, MX US, and TSX Group will continue
to operate their respective businesses in substantially the same manner
as they had prior to the Combination, and MX and MX US senior
management will remain under the stewardship of MX's current chief
executive officer.\10\ Additionally, the operations of each of MX and
TSX Group will continue to be located in the same province in which it
is currently located, and each will remain subject to its existing
regulatory framework and oversight. Consequently, MX US's management of
its ownership interest in BOX shall remain essentially unaffected by
the Combination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Organizational changes contemplated in connection with the
Combination are described in the TSX Group registration statement
separately filed with the Commission regarding the issuance of
shares in connection with the Combination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Section 8.4(g) of the BOX LLC Agreement, BOX LLC is
required to amend the BOX LLC Agreement to make an Acquirer \11\ a
party to the LLC Agreement if such Acquirer acquires a Controlling
Interest \12\ in a BOX Member who holds a percentage interest in BOX
LLC equal to or greater than 20%. Therefore, since TSX Group is
acquiring a Controlling Interest in MX, whose wholly owned subsidiary,
MX US, owns a 31.4% ownership interest in BOX LLC, TSX Group, as an
Acquirer, is required to and will become a party to the BOX LLC
Agreement pursuant to the proposed Instrument of Accession. As a
result, TSX Group will agree to abide by all the provisions of the BOX
LLC Agreement, including those provisions requiring submission to the
jurisdiction of the Commission.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ An ``Acquirer'' is defined as ``a Person who, alone or
together with any Affiliate of such Person, acquires a controlling
interest in a Member.'' See BOX LLC Agreement, Section 8.4(g)(ii).
\12\ A ``Controlling Interest'' is defined as ``the ownership by
any Person, alone or together with any Affiliate of such Person, of
a 25% or greater interest in a Member.'' See BOX LLC Agreement,
Section 8.4(g)(i).
\13\ The BOX LLC Agreement states, in part, that ``the Members,
officers, directors, agents, and employees of Members irrevocably
submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. federal courts,
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Boston Stock
Exchange, for the purposes of any suit, action or proceeding
pursuant to U.S. federal securities laws, the rules or regulations
thereunder, arising out of, or relating to, BOX activities or
Article 19.6(a), (except that such jurisdictions shall also include
Delaware for any such matter relating to the organization or
internal affairs of BOX, provided that such matter is not related to
trading on, or the regulation, of the BOX Market), and hereby waive,
and agree not to assert by way of motion, as a defense or otherwise
in any such suit, action or proceeding, any claims that they are not
personally subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, that the suit, action or proceeding is an
inconvenient forum or that the venue of the suit, action or
proceeding is improper, or that the subject matter hereof may not be
enforced in or by such courts or agency.'' See BOX LLC Agreement,
Section 19.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons stated above, BSE is submitting to the Commission
the proposed Instrument of Accession, which constitutes an amendment to
the BOX LLC Agreement, as a rule change. The proposed rule change is
subject to becoming effective and operative pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \15\ thereunder. BSE
proposes to make this proposal operative upon the consummation of the
Combination, currently anticipated in late February 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\16\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(1),\17\ in particular, in that it
enables the Exchange to be so organized so as to have the capacity to
be able to carry out the purposes of the Act and to comply, and to
enforce compliance by its exchange members and persons associated with
its exchange members, with the provisions of the Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that this filing furthers the objectives
of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \18\ in that it is designed to facilitate
transactions in securities, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange notes that the provisions of the BOX LLC
Agreement, previously approved by the Commission, provide a framework
for addressing the Combination. Accordingly, BSE believes the
Combination does not present any novel
[[Page 7619]]
issues that have not been anticipated and addressed by the BOX LLC
Agreement.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \19\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that BSE has satisfied the five-day
pre-filing notice requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Normally, a proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \21\
may not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.
However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \22\ permits the Commission to designate
a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. In its filing, the
Exchange requested waiver of the 30-day operative delay because the MX
shareholders are expected to approve the Combination on February 13,
2008 and subsequent thereto the Combination is expected to close in
late February of 2008. Furthermore, BSE believes the Combination does
not present any novel issues that have not been anticipated and
addressed by the BOX LLC Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because the proposed rule change will allow the Exchange to proceed
with the Combination, without undue delay, in a manner consistent with
the provisions of the BOX LLC Operating Agreement. Accordingly,
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest,
the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon
consummation of the Combination.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative
delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BSE-2008-06 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2008-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of BSE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2008-06 and should be
submitted on or before February 29, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-2329 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P