Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management and Budget: OMB Control Number: 1625-0003, 6985-6988 [E8-2166]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Notices
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: Arthritis and
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special
Grants Review Committee.
Date: February 28–29, 2008.
Time: 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Contact Person: Helen Lin, PhD, Scientific
Review Administrator, NIH/NIAMS/RB, 6701
Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Plaza One,
Bethesda, MD 20817, 301–594–4952,
linh1@mail.nih.gov.
Dated: January 30, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08–505 Filed 2–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute on Drug Abuse;
Notice of Closed Meetings
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given of the following
meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, NIDA–
E New Investigator R01 SEP.
Date: February 15, 2008.
Time: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852,
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Kesinee Nimit, MD, Health
Scientist Administrator, Office of Extramural
Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse,
NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101
Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892–
8401, (301) 435–1432.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
This notice is being published less than 15
days prior to the meeting due to the timing
limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, NIDA–
Conflicts A.
Date: March 4–5, 2008.
Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Jurys Washington Hotel, 1500 New
Hampshire Avenue, Washington, DC 20036.
Contact Person: Gerald L. McLaughlin,
PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office
of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC
8401, 6101 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD
20892–8401, 301–402–6626,
gm145a@nih.gov.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, Health
Services Research Members Conflict.
Date: March 4–5, 2008.
Time: 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Jurys Washington Hotel, 1500 New
Hampshire Avenue, Washington, DC 20036.
Contact Person: Gerald L. McLaughlin,
PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office
of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC
8401, 6101 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD
20892–8401, 301–402–6626,
gm145a@nih.gov.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, NIDA–
E Conflicts B.
Date: March 4, 2008.
Time: 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Jury Washington Hotel, 1500 New
Hampshire Ave., Washington, DC 20036.
Contact Person: Gerald L. McLaughlin,
PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office
of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC
8401, 6101 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD
20892–8401, 301–402–6626,
gm145a@nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and
Addiction Research Programs, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: January 30, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08–506 Filed 2–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6985
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[USCG–2007–0008]
Collection of Information Under
Review by Office of Management and
Budget: OMB Control Number: 1625–
0003
Coast Guard, DHS.
Thirty-day notice requesting
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
request for comments announces that
the U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an
Information Collection Request (ICR),
abstracted below, to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) of the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) requesting a revision of
their approval for the following
collection of information: 1625–0003,
Coast Guard Boating Accident Report
Form (CG–3865). Our ICR describes the
information we seek to collect from the
public. Review and comments by OIRA
ensure we only impose paperwork
burdens commensurate with our
performance of duties.
DATES: Please submit comments on or
before March 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: To prevent duplicate
submissions to the docket [USCG–2007–
0008] or OIRA, please submit your
comments and related material by only
one of the following means:
(1) Electronic submission. (a) To Coast
Guard docket at https://
www.regulations.gov. (b) To OIRA by
e-mail to: nlesser@omb.eop.gov.
(2) Mail or Hand delivery. (a) To
Docket Management Facility (DMF) (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Hand
deliver between the hours of 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329. (b) To OIRA, 725 17th
Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, to
the attention of the Desk Officer for the
Coast Guard.
(3) Fax. (a) To DMF at 202–493–2251
(b) To: OIRA at 202–395–6566. To
ensure your comments are received in
time, mark the fax to the attention of Mr.
Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer for the
Coast Guard.
The DMF maintains the public docket
for this notice. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this notice as
being available in the docket, will
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
6986
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Notices
become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at
Room W12–140 on the West Building
Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
A copy of the complete ICR is
available through this docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Additionally, copies are available from
Commandant (CG–611), U.S. Coast
Guard Headquarters, (Attn: Mr. Arthur
Requina), 2100 2nd Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20593–0001. The
telephone number is (202) 475–3523.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Arthur Requina, Office of Information
Management, telephone 202–475–3523
or fax 202–475–3929, for questions on
these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, 202–493–0402, for
questions on the docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard invites comments on whether
this information collection request
should be granted based on it being
necessary in the proper performance of
Departmental functions. In particular,
the Coast Guard would appreciate
comments addressing: (1) The practical
utility of the collections; (2) the
accuracy of the estimated burden of the
collections; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of
information subject to the collections;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
collections on respondents, including
the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments to DMF or OIRA must
contain the OMB Control Number of the
ICR addressed. Comments to DMF must
contain the docket number, [USCG
2007–0008]. For your comments to
OIRA to be considered, it is best if they
receive them on or before the March 7,
2008.
Public participation and request for
comments: We encourage you to
respond to this request by submitting
comments and related materials. We
will post all comments received,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov. They will include
any personal information you provide.
We have an agreement with DOT to use
their DMF. Please see the paragraph on
DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act Policy’’ below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a
comment, please include the docket
number [USCG–2007–0008], indicate
the specific section of the document to
which each comment applies, providing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
a reason for each comment. We
recommend you include your name,
mailing address, an e-mail address, or
other contact information in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission. You may submit your
comments and material by electronic
means, mail, fax, or delivery to the DMF
at the address under ADDRESSES; but
please submit them by only one means.
If you submit them by mail or delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope.
The Coast Guard and OIRA will
consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
We may change the documents
supporting this collection of
information or even the underlying
requirements in view of them.
Viewing comments and documents:
Go to https://www.regulations.gov to
view documents mentioned in this
notice as being available in the docket.
Click on ‘‘Search for Dockets,’’ and enter
the docket number [USCG–2007–0008]
in the Docket ID box, and click enter.
You may also visit the DMF in Room
W12–140 on the West Building Ground
Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments
received in dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the
Privacy Act Statement of DOT in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit
https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Previous Request for Comments
This request provides a 30-day
comment period required by OIRA. The
Coast Guard has published the 60-day
notice (72 FR 59101, October 18, 2007)
required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That
notice elicited comments from five
individuals/organizations.
The Coast Guard issued an OMB
Information Collection supporting
statement for its Boating Accident
Report form (CG–3865) for public
comment on October 18, 2007. The
proposed information collection
activities are based on comments
received on the currently approved form
and input from state boat accident
reporting authorities. To develop this
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
new form, the Coast Guard consulted
with a nationally known expert in forms
design, who conducted a usability test
to detect flaws. The test provided
information on respondents’ views on
the present and recommended forms.
The current proposed form is based on
the results of the usability test and the
comments received from the 60-day
notice.
Following the initial 60-day period
during which the public was able to
comment on the ICR, the Coast Guard
received five comments. We reviewed
each of these comments with diligence,
and made some changes to the form
where it was deemed appropriate. A
summary of the public comments, our
responses to those comments, and the
changes that were made to the form are
summarized below.
Summary of General Comments From
the Public
• Several commenters stated that this
form is much longer than some of those
from the state.
• Some commenters suggested
combining ‘‘Accident Details—Other
Key People’’ and ‘‘Serious Injuries and
Deaths’’ sections.
• One commenter noted that the ‘‘For
State Agency Use Only’’ section would
not be used.
• One commenter suggested
condensing the two ‘‘Report Submitted’’
(on pages one and six) sections into one.
• One commenter suggested there be
separate areas that apply first to the
accident itself (date, time, location,
weather, type/cause of accident), and
then areas that apply to the operator,
vessel, and people on board.
• A commenter stated that mixing
questions, of which some relate to all
people on the vessel and some only to
a single vessel, is confusing and
inconsistent.
• A commenter noted that some of
the choices in the ‘‘Contributing
Factors’’ section need to be better
defined to prevent confusion.
• One commenter suggested
increasing the data collection fields for
the second operator, which would
provide additional information.
USCG Response to General Comments
We understand the concerns
expressed in these comments, but all of
the information is pertinent. The
information provided on this form will
be used for statistical and analysis
purposes. Based on reporting
requirements in 33 CFR part 173, the
operator of vessel(s) involved in an
accident is required to fill out a separate
report form. In addition, this proposed
form underwent a usability test, and
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Notices
was consistently preferred to the present
one.
Comments on Page One of the New
Form
• Several commenters suggested
including the operator/owner
information found on the last page on
the first one as well. Response: The first
page already has a place for the
operator/owner to provide their name
and telephone number.
• A commenter proposed breaking
out information regarding the number of
people on board, towed, and wearing
life jackets. Response: The form, as
proposed, already collects all of this
information.
• One commenter recommended
increasing the size of the ‘‘Accident
Description’’ box. Response: The
instructions for completing this box
allow an operator/owner to include
additional pages if necessary to provide
all necessary information.
• A commenter stated that the
‘‘Report Submitted By’’ section should
include Boat Operator/Owner, or
Accident Investigator, providing the
latter a useful form if the former is the
only one on board and dies in the
accident. Response: We considered this.
Therefore, the form allows for the
selection of operator/owner, or other.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Comments on Page Two of the New
Form
• One commenter proposed including
engine make, serial number, and total
number of engines in the ‘‘Engine’’
section. Response: We already included
these on the form, except for the serial
number(s). We do not feel we have the
space to include this piece of
information and what the benefit would
be for capturing it. We also believe that
the likelihood of the public providing
engine serial numbers is low because
this is not common knowledge.
• A commenter suggested that we
should collect whether a fire
extinguisher was used and what type.
Response: We added the number and
type of fire extinguishers used.
• One commenter stated that ‘‘Size of
Vessel’’ information is not general
knowledge and therefore, it should be
deleted. Response: This is required
under 33 CFR part 173; therefore, we
must include it.
Comments on Page Three of the New
Form
• A commenter expressed concern
regarding the integrity of information
regarding alcohol and drug usage as
contributing factors. Response: We
understand this concern. However, it is
a requirement that the operator
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
complete the form and this information
be furnished.
• Several commenters suggested
modifications to the ‘‘Machinery/
Equipment Failure’’ and ‘‘Contributing
Factors’’ sections. These included
reorganizing the options/instructions
regarding the sections. Response: We
rearranged these sections so they follow
one another. However, we did not edit
the instructions since they provide
adequate information.
• One commenter suggested
including Pleasure Boating in the
‘‘Operator/Passenger Activities’’ section.
Response: We believe the other options
cover this suggestion.
• A commenter proposed listing
Recreational above Commercial in the
‘‘Operator/Passenger Activities’’ section.
Response: We agree and made this
change.
• Another commenter suggested that
in the ‘‘Boat Operations’’ section
Cruising, Changing Direction, Changing
Speed should be the first choices, and
listed in that order. Response: We agree
and made this change.
• A commenter stated that in the
‘‘Accident Events’’ section, there is no
option for Person Struck by Own Boat.
Response: There is an option for Other,
where an operator could write in this
accident description.
• A commenter suggested deleting the
choice ‘‘Drifting’’ from the ‘‘Operator/
Passenger Activities’’ section and
consider the choices ‘‘kite boarding,
windsurfing, parasailing, and racing.’’
Response: We appreciate the
commenter’s input regarding the
Operator/Passenger activities. However,
not all activities suggested are
applicable nationwide, while others are
already included in the activity choices.
In addition, this section does include an
‘Other’ box allowing an operator to
include these options. Finally, some of
these choices are required in 33 CFR
part 173.
Comments on Page Four of the New
Form
• A commenter suggested that in
addition to the ‘‘Accident Details—
Injured People Receiving or in Need of
Treatment Beyond First Aid’’ and
‘‘Accident Details—Deaths/
Disappearances,’’ add ‘‘people being
towed by your boat,’’ since this would
clearly indicate those not being towed.
Response: We agree and added the
suggested language in the explanatory
language relating to both of these
sections.
• Several commenters proposed
including more than one space for
additional parties in the ‘‘Injured
Persons’’ and the ‘‘Person Who Died/
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6987
Disappeared’’ section. Response: The
instructions for both the ‘‘Injured
Persons’’ and the ‘‘Person Who Died/
Disappeared’’ sections allow for
inclusion of additional pages.
• One commenter expressed concern
with allowing laypersons to determine
cause of injuries as required in ‘‘Injury
Details’’ and ‘‘Nature of Primary Injury.’’
Response: We understand the concern
with laypersons making this
determination, but, it is a requirement
that the operator complete the form.
Comments on Page Five of the New
Form
• One commenter suggested placing
the ‘‘Accident Details—Other Key
People’’ section prior to collection of
data on the operator, owner, and injured
parties makes the form confusing.
Response: We do not agree with this
suggestion and will leave all of the boat
operator/owner information together.
• In the ‘‘Operator Safety Measures’’
section, a commenter proposed adding a
‘‘Not Equipped’’ option under ‘‘An
engine cut-off switch (Lanyard) if
equipped.’’ Response: Since there is
currently no requirement for a boat to be
equipped with an engine cut-off switch,
we do not believe it is necessary to
collect this information.
• A commenter expressed concern
that the ‘‘Operator Instruction’’ section
is confusing, expressing particular
concern with the internet field.
• Response: The internet field is
necessary, as there are many boating
safety courses available online.
• A commenter suggested including
‘‘Safety Lanyard’’ or ‘‘Wireless
Emergency Shutoff Device’’ to account
for wireless instruments now being used
for engine shutoff. Response: We agree
and clarified the language in this
section.
Comments on Page Six of the New Form
• One commenter suggested that the
signature of ‘‘Person Submitting this
Report’’ should be more obvious.
Response: We believe having a signature
block as the last item is consistent with
many other forms that require a
signature. We added more emphasis to
the signature block section to draw
attention to it.
• Several commenters proposed that
the ‘‘Boat Operator’’ information be
collected on page one and that the ‘‘Boat
Owner’’ information be collected on
both page one/six. Response: The first
page of the form already collects the
boat operator or owners’ name and
contact phone number.
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
6988
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Notices
Information Collection Request
Title: Coast Guard Boating Accident
Report Form (CG–3865).
OMB Control Number: 1625–0003.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Operators of vessels/
subject equipment involved in
occurrences where—
• A person dies or is injured and
requires medical treatment beyond first
aid;
• Damage is incurred to either the
vessel or other property damages of
$2,000 or more; or
• A person disappears from the vessel
under circumstances indicating death or
injury. See §§ 173.57 and 173.59.
Form: CG–3865.
Abstract: Section 6102(a) of 46 U.S.C.
requires a uniform marine casualty
system with regulations prescribing
casualties to be reported, and the
manner thereof. The statute requires a
State to compile and submit to the
Secretary (delegated to the Coast Guard)
reports, information, and statistics on
casualties reported. Implementing
regulations are contained in 33 CFR part
173—Vessel Numbering and Casualty
and Accident Reporting; subpart C—
Casualty and Accident Reporting, and
33 CFR part 174—State Numbering and
Casualty Reporting Systems; subpart
C—Casualty Reporting System
Requirements; and subpart D—State
reports.
States are required to forward copies
of the reports or electronically transmit
accident data to the Coast Guard within
30 days of receipt as prescribed in 33
CFR 174.121. The accident report data
and statistical information obtained
from submissions by the State
authorities are used by the Coast Guard
in the compilation of national
recreational boating accident statistics.
Burden Estimate: The estimated
burden remains 2,500 hours a year.
Dated: January 30, 2008.
D.T. Glenn,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant
Commandant for Command, Control,
Communications, Computers and
Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E8–2166 Filed 2–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5100–FA–15]
Announcement of Funding Awards for
Fiscal Year 2007 for the Housing
Choice Voucher Program
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Announcement of Fiscal Year
2007 awards.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section
102(a)(4)(C) of the Department of
Housing and Urban Development
Reform Act of 1989, this document
notifies the public of funding awards for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 to housing
agencies (HAs) under the Section 8
housing choice voucher program. The
purpose of this notice is to publish the
names, addresses, and the amount of the
awards to HAs for non-competitive
funding awards for housing conversion
actions, public housing relocations and
replacements, moderate rehabilitation
replacements, and HOPE VI voucher
awards.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Vargas, Director, Office of
Housing Voucher Programs, Office of
Public and Indian Housing, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 4226,
Washington, DC 20410–5000, telephone
(202) 708–2815. Hearing- or speechimpaired individuals may call HUD’s
TTY number at (800) 927–7589. (Only
the ‘‘800’’ telephone number is tollfree.)
The
regulations governing the housing
choice voucher program are published
at 24 CFR 982. The regulations for
allocating housing assistance budget
authority under Section 213(d) of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974 are published at 24 CFR part
791, Subpart D.
The purpose of this rental assistance
program is to assist eligible families to
pay their rent for decent, safe, and
sanitary housing. The FY 2007 awardees
announced in this notice were provided
Section 8 funds on an as-needed, noncompetitive basis, i.e., not consistent
with the provisions of a Notice of
Funding Availability (NOFAs). Tenant
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
protection voucher awards made to
PHAs for program actions that displace
families living in public housing were
made on a first-come, first-served basis
in accordance with the non-competitive
awards preference categories announced
in PIH Notice 2007–10 Voucher
Funding in Connection with the
Demolition or Disposition of Occupied
Public Housing Units. Announcements
of awards provided under the NOFA
process for mainstream housing and
designated housing programs will be
published in a separate Federal Register
notice.
Awards published under this notice
were provided (1) to assist families
living in HUD-owned properties that are
being sold; (2) to assist families affected
by the expiration or termination of their
project-based Section 8 and moderate
rehabilitation contracts; (3) to assist
families in properties where the owner
has prepaid the HUD mortgage; (4) to
provide relocation housing assistance in
connection with the demolition of
public housing; (5) to provide
replacement housing assistance for
single room occupancy (SRO) units that
fail housing quality standards (HQS);
and (6) to assist families in public
housing developments that are
scheduled for demolition in connection
with a HUD-approved HOPE VI
Revitalization or Demolition Grant.
Administrative fees were added to each
assignment for the administration of
housing choice vouchers awarded under
this notice. In addition, special housing
fees were included for applicable
Housing tenant protection awards.
A total of $149,146,013 in budget
authority for 25,292 housing choice
vouchers was awarded to recipients
under all of the above-mentioned
categories. Of the total amount awarded,
$3,112,902 is provided from the HOPE
VI account.
In accordance with Section
102(a)(4)(C) of the Department of
Housing and Urban Development
Reform Act of 1989 (103 Stat. 1987, 42
U.S.C. 3545), the Department is
publishing the names, addresses, and
amounts of those awards as shown in
Appendix A.
Dated: January 29, 2008.
Paula O. Blunt,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Office
of Public and Indian Housing.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS ANNOUNCEMENT OF AWARDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007
Housing agency
Address
Public Housing Tenant Protection Moderate Rehabilitation
Replacements:
HSG AUTH OF BESSEMER ........................................
P.O. BOX 1390, BESSEMER, AL 35021 .........
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
Units
06FEN1
Award
121
567,608
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6985-6988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2166]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
[USCG-2007-0008]
Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management
and Budget: OMB Control Number: 1625-0003
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Thirty-day notice requesting comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
request for comments announces that the U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding
an Information Collection Request (ICR), abstracted below, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) requesting a revision of their approval for
the following collection of information: 1625-0003, Coast Guard Boating
Accident Report Form (CG-3865). Our ICR describes the information we
seek to collect from the public. Review and comments by OIRA ensure we
only impose paperwork burdens commensurate with our performance of
duties.
DATES: Please submit comments on or before March 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: To prevent duplicate submissions to the docket [USCG-2007-
0008] or OIRA, please submit your comments and related material by only
one of the following means:
(1) Electronic submission. (a) To Coast Guard docket at https://
www.regulations.gov. (b) To OIRA by e-mail to: nlesser@omb.eop.gov.
(2) Mail or Hand delivery. (a) To Docket Management Facility (DMF)
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand deliver between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
(b) To OIRA, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, to the
attention of the Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.
(3) Fax. (a) To DMF at 202-493-2251 (b) To: OIRA at 202-395-6566.
To ensure your comments are received in time, mark the fax to the
attention of Mr. Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.
The DMF maintains the public docket for this notice. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in
this notice as being available in the docket, will
[[Page 6986]]
become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or
copying at Room W12-140 on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
A copy of the complete ICR is available through this docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are
available from Commandant (CG-611), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters,
(Attn: Mr. Arthur Requina), 2100 2nd Street SW., Washington, DC 20593-
0001. The telephone number is (202) 475-3523.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of
Information Management, telephone 202-475-3523 or fax 202-475-3929, for
questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, 202-493-0402, for questions on the docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard invites comments on whether
this information collection request should be granted based on it being
necessary in the proper performance of Departmental functions. In
particular, the Coast Guard would appreciate comments addressing: (1)
The practical utility of the collections; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden of the collections; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of information subject to the collections; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of collections on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments to DMF or OIRA must contain the OMB Control Number of the
ICR addressed. Comments to DMF must contain the docket number, [USCG
2007-0008]. For your comments to OIRA to be considered, it is best if
they receive them on or before the March 7, 2008.
Public participation and request for comments: We encourage you to
respond to this request by submitting comments and related materials.
We will post all comments received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov. They will include any personal information you
provide. We have an agreement with DOT to use their DMF. Please see the
paragraph on DOT's ``Privacy Act Policy'' below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
docket number [USCG-2007-0008], indicate the specific section of the
document to which each comment applies, providing a reason for each
comment. We recommend you include your name, mailing address, an e-mail
address, or other contact information in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail,
fax, or delivery to the DMF at the address under ADDRESSES; but please
submit them by only one means. If you submit them by mail or delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail
and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope.
The Coast Guard and OIRA will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period. We may change the documents
supporting this collection of information or even the underlying
requirements in view of them.
Viewing comments and documents: Go to https://www.regulations.gov to
view documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the
docket. Click on ``Search for Dockets,'' and enter the docket number
[USCG-2007-0008] in the Docket ID box, and click enter. You may also
visit the DMF in Room W12-140 on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments
received in dockets by the name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Privacy
Act Statement of DOT in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Previous Request for Comments
This request provides a 30-day comment period required by OIRA. The
Coast Guard has published the 60-day notice (72 FR 59101, October 18,
2007) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That notice elicited comments
from five individuals/organizations.
The Coast Guard issued an OMB Information Collection supporting
statement for its Boating Accident Report form (CG-3865) for public
comment on October 18, 2007. The proposed information collection
activities are based on comments received on the currently approved
form and input from state boat accident reporting authorities. To
develop this new form, the Coast Guard consulted with a nationally
known expert in forms design, who conducted a usability test to detect
flaws. The test provided information on respondents' views on the
present and recommended forms. The current proposed form is based on
the results of the usability test and the comments received from the
60-day notice.
Following the initial 60-day period during which the public was
able to comment on the ICR, the Coast Guard received five comments. We
reviewed each of these comments with diligence, and made some changes
to the form where it was deemed appropriate. A summary of the public
comments, our responses to those comments, and the changes that were
made to the form are summarized below.
Summary of General Comments From the Public
Several commenters stated that this form is much longer
than some of those from the state.
Some commenters suggested combining ``Accident Details--
Other Key People'' and ``Serious Injuries and Deaths'' sections.
One commenter noted that the ``For State Agency Use Only''
section would not be used.
One commenter suggested condensing the two ``Report
Submitted'' (on pages one and six) sections into one.
One commenter suggested there be separate areas that apply
first to the accident itself (date, time, location, weather, type/cause
of accident), and then areas that apply to the operator, vessel, and
people on board.
A commenter stated that mixing questions, of which some
relate to all people on the vessel and some only to a single vessel, is
confusing and inconsistent.
A commenter noted that some of the choices in the
``Contributing Factors'' section need to be better defined to prevent
confusion.
One commenter suggested increasing the data collection
fields for the second operator, which would provide additional
information.
USCG Response to General Comments
We understand the concerns expressed in these comments, but all of
the information is pertinent. The information provided on this form
will be used for statistical and analysis purposes. Based on reporting
requirements in 33 CFR part 173, the operator of vessel(s) involved in
an accident is required to fill out a separate report form. In
addition, this proposed form underwent a usability test, and
[[Page 6987]]
was consistently preferred to the present one.
Comments on Page One of the New Form
Several commenters suggested including the operator/owner
information found on the last page on the first one as well. Response:
The first page already has a place for the operator/owner to provide
their name and telephone number.
A commenter proposed breaking out information regarding
the number of people on board, towed, and wearing life jackets.
Response: The form, as proposed, already collects all of this
information.
One commenter recommended increasing the size of the
``Accident Description'' box. Response: The instructions for completing
this box allow an operator/owner to include additional pages if
necessary to provide all necessary information.
A commenter stated that the ``Report Submitted By''
section should include Boat Operator/Owner, or Accident Investigator,
providing the latter a useful form if the former is the only one on
board and dies in the accident. Response: We considered this.
Therefore, the form allows for the selection of operator/owner, or
other.
Comments on Page Two of the New Form
One commenter proposed including engine make, serial
number, and total number of engines in the ``Engine'' section.
Response: We already included these on the form, except for the serial
number(s). We do not feel we have the space to include this piece of
information and what the benefit would be for capturing it. We also
believe that the likelihood of the public providing engine serial
numbers is low because this is not common knowledge.
A commenter suggested that we should collect whether a
fire extinguisher was used and what type. Response: We added the number
and type of fire extinguishers used.
One commenter stated that ``Size of Vessel'' information
is not general knowledge and therefore, it should be deleted. Response:
This is required under 33 CFR part 173; therefore, we must include it.
Comments on Page Three of the New Form
A commenter expressed concern regarding the integrity of
information regarding alcohol and drug usage as contributing factors.
Response: We understand this concern. However, it is a requirement that
the operator complete the form and this information be furnished.
Several commenters suggested modifications to the
``Machinery/Equipment Failure'' and ``Contributing Factors'' sections.
These included reorganizing the options/instructions regarding the
sections. Response: We rearranged these sections so they follow one
another. However, we did not edit the instructions since they provide
adequate information.
One commenter suggested including Pleasure Boating in the
``Operator/Passenger Activities'' section. Response: We believe the
other options cover this suggestion.
A commenter proposed listing Recreational above Commercial
in the ``Operator/Passenger Activities'' section. Response: We agree
and made this change.
Another commenter suggested that in the ``Boat
Operations'' section Cruising, Changing Direction, Changing Speed
should be the first choices, and listed in that order. Response: We
agree and made this change.
A commenter stated that in the ``Accident Events''
section, there is no option for Person Struck by Own Boat. Response:
There is an option for Other, where an operator could write in this
accident description.
A commenter suggested deleting the choice ``Drifting''
from the ``Operator/Passenger Activities'' section and consider the
choices ``kite boarding, windsurfing, parasailing, and racing.''
Response: We appreciate the commenter's input regarding the Operator/
Passenger activities. However, not all activities suggested are
applicable nationwide, while others are already included in the
activity choices. In addition, this section does include an `Other' box
allowing an operator to include these options. Finally, some of these
choices are required in 33 CFR part 173.
Comments on Page Four of the New Form
A commenter suggested that in addition to the ``Accident
Details--Injured People Receiving or in Need of Treatment Beyond First
Aid'' and ``Accident Details--Deaths/Disappearances,'' add ``people
being towed by your boat,'' since this would clearly indicate those not
being towed. Response: We agree and added the suggested language in the
explanatory language relating to both of these sections.
Several commenters proposed including more than one space
for additional parties in the ``Injured Persons'' and the ``Person Who
Died/Disappeared'' section. Response: The instructions for both the
``Injured Persons'' and the ``Person Who Died/Disappeared'' sections
allow for inclusion of additional pages.
One commenter expressed concern with allowing laypersons
to determine cause of injuries as required in ``Injury Details'' and
``Nature of Primary Injury.'' Response: We understand the concern with
laypersons making this determination, but, it is a requirement that the
operator complete the form.
Comments on Page Five of the New Form
One commenter suggested placing the ``Accident Details--
Other Key People'' section prior to collection of data on the operator,
owner, and injured parties makes the form confusing. Response: We do
not agree with this suggestion and will leave all of the boat operator/
owner information together.
In the ``Operator Safety Measures'' section, a commenter
proposed adding a ``Not Equipped'' option under ``An engine cut-off
switch (Lanyard) if equipped.'' Response: Since there is currently no
requirement for a boat to be equipped with an engine cut-off switch, we
do not believe it is necessary to collect this information.
A commenter expressed concern that the ``Operator
Instruction'' section is confusing, expressing particular concern with
the internet field.
Response: The internet field is necessary, as there are
many boating safety courses available online.
A commenter suggested including ``Safety Lanyard'' or
``Wireless Emergency Shutoff Device'' to account for wireless
instruments now being used for engine shutoff. Response: We agree and
clarified the language in this section.
Comments on Page Six of the New Form
One commenter suggested that the signature of ``Person
Submitting this Report'' should be more obvious. Response: We believe
having a signature block as the last item is consistent with many other
forms that require a signature. We added more emphasis to the signature
block section to draw attention to it.
Several commenters proposed that the ``Boat Operator''
information be collected on page one and that the ``Boat Owner''
information be collected on both page one/six. Response: The first page
of the form already collects the boat operator or owners' name and
contact phone number.
[[Page 6988]]
Information Collection Request
Title: Coast Guard Boating Accident Report Form (CG-3865).
OMB Control Number: 1625-0003.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Operators of vessels/subject equipment involved in
occurrences where--
A person dies or is injured and requires medical treatment
beyond first aid;
Damage is incurred to either the vessel or other property
damages of $2,000 or more; or
A person disappears from the vessel under circumstances
indicating death or injury. See Sec. Sec. 173.57 and 173.59.
Form: CG-3865.
Abstract: Section 6102(a) of 46 U.S.C. requires a uniform marine
casualty system with regulations prescribing casualties to be reported,
and the manner thereof. The statute requires a State to compile and
submit to the Secretary (delegated to the Coast Guard) reports,
information, and statistics on casualties reported. Implementing
regulations are contained in 33 CFR part 173--Vessel Numbering and
Casualty and Accident Reporting; subpart C--Casualty and Accident
Reporting, and 33 CFR part 174--State Numbering and Casualty Reporting
Systems; subpart C--Casualty Reporting System Requirements; and subpart
D--State reports.
States are required to forward copies of the reports or
electronically transmit accident data to the Coast Guard within 30 days
of receipt as prescribed in 33 CFR 174.121. The accident report data
and statistical information obtained from submissions by the State
authorities are used by the Coast Guard in the compilation of national
recreational boating accident statistics.
Burden Estimate: The estimated burden remains 2,500 hours a year.
Dated: January 30, 2008.
D.T. Glenn,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Command,
Control, Communications, Computers and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E8-2166 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P