Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 6556-6558 [E8-2016]
Download as PDF
6556
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2008 / Notices
Will the Agency Consider Late
Comments?
SE., Room W45–331, Washington, DC
20590.
We will consider all comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent
possible, we will also consider
comments received after that date.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2007–0043]
How Can I Read the Comments
Submitted By Other People?
You may read the materials placed in
the docket for this document (e.g., the
comments submitted in response to this
document by other interested persons)
at any time by going to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
You may also read the materials at the
Docket Management Facility by going to
the street address given above under
ADDRESSES. The Docket Management
Facility is open between 9 am and 5 pm
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c); delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: January 29, 2008.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E8–1938 Filed 2–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collections
and their expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on November 9,
2007 [72 FR 63650].
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before March 5, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anetris Campbell at the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
Office of Rulemaking (NVS–100), 202–
366–0933. 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Feb 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
Title: 49 CFR part 552, Petitions for
Rulemaking, Defects, and
Noncompliance Orders.
OMB Number: 2127–0046.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: 49 U.S.C. 30162 specifies
that any ‘‘interested person may file a
petition with the Secretary of
Transportation requesting the Secretary
to begin a proceeding’’ to prescribe a
motor vehicle safety standard under 49
U.S.C. chapter 301, or to decide whether
to issue an order under 49 U.S.C.
30118(b). 49 U.S.C. 30111 gives the
Secretary authority to prescribe motor
vehicle safety standards. 49 U.S.C.
30118(b) gives the Secretary authority to
issue an order to a manufacturer to
notify vehicle or equipment owners,
purchasers, and dealers of the defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance.
Section 30162 further specifies that
all petitions filed under its authority
shall set forth the facts, which it is
claimed establish that an order is
necessary and briefly describe the order
the Secretary should issue.
Affected Public: Business or other-forprofit.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 20.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30
days, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725–17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A Comment to OMB is most effective
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Issued on: January 29, 2008.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E8–1939 Filed 2–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes one
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to U.S. Department of Transportation
Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Docket No.
NHTSA–2007–0043.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Keith Williams, Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative, Highway
Safety Specialist, Enforcement and
Justice Services Division, NTI–122,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W44–231,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2008 / Notices
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
collection of information:
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Evaluation Surveys for Demonstration
of Speed Management Programs
(including Automated and Traditional
Enforcement)
Type of Request—New information
collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number—None.
Form Number—This collection of
information uses no standard forms.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval—3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information—NHTSA proposes to
conduct telephone surveys to evaluate
an intervention designed to reduce
speeding. Sample size will range from
200 to 400 per survey wave depending
on the geographic area unit being
surveyed (State, community) and the
evaluation design for the intervention
(e.g., number of analytic groups).
Interview length will be
approximately10 minutes. The surveys
will collect information on attitudes,
awareness knowledge, and behavior
related to the speed management
program intervention. Surveys will be
administered in areas where NHTSA is
conducting speed management
enforcement demonstration projects and
similar control sites. The surveys will
follow a pre-post design where they are
administered prior to the
implementation of the intervention and
after its conclusion. Interim survey
waves may also be administered if the
duration of the intervention permits.
In conducting the proposed surveys,
the interviewers will use computerassisted telephone interviewing to
reduce interview length and minimize
recording errors. A Spanish Language
translation and bilingual interviewers
will be used to minimize language
barriers in participation. The proposed
surveys will be anonymous.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Feb 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration’s (NHTSA) mission is to
save lives, prevent injuries, and reduce
healthcare and other economic costs
associated with motor vehicle crashes.
The agency’s goal is to reduce the rate
of fatalities from speeding-related
crashes. The National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) was
established to reduce the mounting
number of deaths, injuries, and
economic losses resulting from motor
vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards
and traffic safety programs.
NHTSA has periodically updated its
knowledge and understanding of the
public’s attitudes and behaviors with
respect to speeding. In 1998, NHTSA
conducted a national survey (National
Survey of Speeding and Other Unsafe
Driving Actions: Volume III:
Countermeasures, Final Report) which
indicated 71% of the general public
favored automated devices for speed
enforcement, and 76% believed the use
of automated devices reduced speedingrelated accidents. This survey also
showed females were 15% more likely
to be in favor of using automated speed
enforcement than males, as well as,
reasons why the public liked or disliked
automated speeding devices. Twenty
percent (20%) liked automated speeding
devices because photo evidence proved
a violation and 19% liked it because it
increased driver awareness and fewer
law enforcement officers were needed
for traffic enforcement. Twenty-six
percent (26%) did not like automated
speeding enforcement because it
invaded privacy, was a violation of
rights or was a governmental
infringement. Four years later NHTSA
sponsored another national survey
(National Survey of Speeding and
Unsafe Driving Attitudes and Behavior:
2002: Volume II.) that found 68% of the
general public believed the use of
automated speed enforcement was good
for anyone driving at least 20 miles per
hour more than the speed limit, and
78% favored automated enforcement in
a school zone. Fifty-Six percent (56%)
of the public favored photos being taken
of the driver from a frontal view while
32% favored taking photos of the rear
license plate only. Since these surveys
were conducted years ago they cannot
be used to evaluate new programs
scheduled to be initiated in the next few
years.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6557
Beginning in 2008, NHTSA intends to
administer a demonstration project over
a three-year period that will include two
years where selected sites will
incorporate both traditional law
enforcement and use of automated
enforcement of speeding in the
demonstration area. The demonstration
project will be accompanied by a Public
Information and Education campaign
about speeding and driving safety.
Before and after this demonstration
project, NHTSA will conduct telephone
surveys in waves of up to 400 adult
drivers living in the selected
demonstration project areas, as well as,
a comparison area. These surveys will
measure the change in public attitude
about speeding and driving behavior
resulting from the enforcement and
Public Information and Education
campaigns.
These surveys will collect the
following type of information: Whether
members of the general public support
automated enforcement; if the support
varies by the specific speed being
traveled; where the speeding occurs,
such as a school zone or other road type;
whether there is a preference for photos
to be taken of the driver versus the
license plate of the vehicle; whether
there are a differences by sex or age; the
reasons for supporting or not supporting
automated speed enforcement versus
traditional law enforcement officer
enforcement; whether members of the
general public are aware of the public
information campaign in their area
about speeding; whether this public
information campaign has caused them
to change their opinions toward
speeding or whether the public
information campaign has affected their
behavior by causing them to be more
careful about observing speed limits or
reducing the speed they drive; the
overall effectiveness of the public
information campaign; determining
what is an appropriate balance between
automated speed enforcement and
traditional law enforcement officer
enforcement; whether members of the
general public believe automated
speeding enforcement should be
expanded, and the effectiveness of
automated and traditional enforcement
measures on reducing crashes, injuries
and saving lives.
These surveys will help NHTSA to
evaluate a demonstration project on
speed management using automated and
traditional speed enforcement. The
findings will be used to help focus the
program and determine which activities
achieve the greatest benefit. This
information will then be used to
develop new programs to decrease the
likelihood of speeding, and to provide
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
6558
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2008 / Notices
informational support to States,
localities, and law enforcement agencies
that will aid them in their efforts to
reduce speeding crashes and injuries.
This demonstration project could be a
model for how jurisdictions can develop
a self-sustaining and effective speed
management program using both
traditional and automated speed
enforcement methods. A demonstration
project incorporating rational speed
limits, a public communications plan
and rigorously enforced speed limits
over a defined geographic area will
assist jurisdictions in understanding
how to gain higher compliance with
speed limits and bring about a reduction
in speeding-related crashes, injuries and
deaths.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)
Under this proposed effort, NHTSA
intends to conduct telephone surveys to
collect data from up to 1,600 licensed
drivers age 18 and older. Interviews will
be conducted with persons at residential
phone numbers selected through
random digit dialing and located within
the jurisdiction where the speed
enforcement demonstration project is
conducted, as well as control areas.
Businesses will be ineligible for the
sample and will not be interviewed. No
more than one respondent will be
selected per household. Each member of
the sample will complete one interview.
After each wave is completed and the
data analyzed, the findings will be
disseminated to the participating States
for review.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting
and Recordkeeping Burden Resulting
From the Collection of Information
NHTSA estimates the respondents in
the sample will require an average of 10
minutes to complete the telephone
interviews. Thus, the estimated
reporting burden hours on the general
public will be a maximum of 137 hours
per year, for two years. The respondents
will not incur any reporting cost from
the information collection. The
respondents also will not incur any
record keeping burden or record
keeping cost from the information
collection.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Marilena Amoni,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–2016 Filed 2–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Feb 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund
Request for Public Comments,
Community Development Financial
Institutions Program
Community Development
Financial Institutions Fund, Department
of the Treasury.
SUMMARY: This document invites
comments from the public on certain
issues regarding, for purposes of the
Community Development Financial
Institutions (CDFI) Program, the CDFI
Fund’s certification of entities as CDFIs,
pursuant to the CDFI Program
regulations set forth at 12 CFR 1805.201.
All materials submitted will be available
for public inspection and copying.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before March 5, 2008 to
be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent
by mail to: Certification and Training
Manager, CDFI Fund, U.S. Department
of the Treasury, 601 13th Street, NW.,
Suite 200 South, Washington, DC 20005;
by e-mail to cdfihelp@cdfi.treas.gov; or
by facsimile at (202) 622–7754. This is
not a toll free number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information regarding the CDFI Fund
and its programs may be downloaded
from the CDFI Fund’s Web site at
https://www.cdfifund.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Community Development Banking and
Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12
U.S.C. 4701 et seq.) authorizes the CDFI
Fund to select and provide financial
assistance and technical assistance to
eligible applicants through the CDFI
Program. Pursuant to 12 U.S.C.
4702(5)(a) and in accordance with
regulations set forth at 12 CFR 1805.201,
the CDFI Fund certifies eligible entities
as CDFIs. The capitalized terms found
in this notice are defined in the CDFI
Program regulations found at 12 CFR
part 1805. Through this notice, the CDFI
Fund is seeking comments from the
public regarding the CDFI Fund’s
certification of organizations as CDFIs.
Commentators are encouraged to
consider, at a minimum, the following
issues:
(1) Primary Mission Criteria: To be
certified as a CDFI, the entity must have
a primary mission of community
development (12 CFR 1805.201(b)(1)).
(a) Should the primary mission
criteria differ by organization type? If so,
how?
(b)(i) Should the CDFI Fund consider
the types of Financial Products offered
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
by an entity as relevant to the primary
mission criteria? Specifically, should
the CDFI Fund review, as part of the
certification process, evidence of the
affordability of an entity’s Financial
Products to the intended customers?
(ii) How else might the CDFI Fund
ensure that CDFI certification is not
given to entities that engage in what are
commonly called ‘‘predatory lending
practices’’ or include so-called
‘‘predatory lending terms’’ in their
lending products?
(iii) Should the CDFI Fund require
entities to provide Financial Products at
a cost that is at least comparable to
market rates or at some minimum level
of affordability to their Target Markets
in order to satisfy the primary mission
criteria? If yes, how should market rates
or minimum levels of affordability be
determined?
(2) Financing Entity Criteria: To be
certified as a CDFI, an entity’s
predominant business activity must be
the provision, in arms-length
transactions, of Financial Products,
Development Services, and/or other
similar financing (12 CFR
1805.201(b)(2)).
(a)(i) What minimum level of
financing activity (i.e., number of
transactions, dollar amount of
transactions, years of operation, and/or
financing) should the CDFI Fund
consider to be acceptable to determine
that an entity is a financing entity?
(ii) How might this minimum level
differ among organization types?
(b)(i) Is three (3) months worth of
financing capital a reasonable measure
of an entity’s ability to sustain its
financing activities? Should the period
of time be longer or shorter?
(ii) What other measure(s) should the
CDFI Fund use to determine that an
entity can sustain its financing
activities?
(c) The CDFI Fund’s definition of
Financial Products includes Loans,
Equity Investments, and similar
financing activities (as determined by
the CDFI Fund) including the purchase
of loans originated by certified CDFIs
and the provision of loan guarantees.
Should the CDFI Fund expand this
definition? If so, what other products
should be included?
(3) Target Market Criteria: In order to
be certified as a CDFI, an entity must
serve a Target Market consisting of one
or more Investment Areas and/or
Targeted Populations (12 CFR
1805.201(b)(3)).
(a) Are the CDFI Fund’s Target Market
options (Investment Area, Low Income
Target Population, and Other Targeted
Population) clear? If not, how can the
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6556-6558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2016]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0043]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections.
This document describes one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to U.S. Department of
Transportation Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0043.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Keith Williams, Contracting
Officer's Technical Representative, Highway Safety Specialist,
Enforcement and Justice Services Division, NTI-122, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W44-
231, Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the
[[Page 6557]]
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed collection of information:
Evaluation Surveys for Demonstration of Speed Management Programs
(including Automated and Traditional Enforcement)
Type of Request--New information collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number--None.
Form Number--This collection of information uses no standard forms.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval--3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information--NHTSA proposes to conduct
telephone surveys to evaluate an intervention designed to reduce
speeding. Sample size will range from 200 to 400 per survey wave
depending on the geographic area unit being surveyed (State, community)
and the evaluation design for the intervention (e.g., number of
analytic groups). Interview length will be approximately10 minutes. The
surveys will collect information on attitudes, awareness knowledge, and
behavior related to the speed management program intervention. Surveys
will be administered in areas where NHTSA is conducting speed
management enforcement demonstration projects and similar control
sites. The surveys will follow a pre-post design where they are
administered prior to the implementation of the intervention and after
its conclusion. Interim survey waves may also be administered if the
duration of the intervention permits.
In conducting the proposed surveys, the interviewers will use
computer-assisted telephone interviewing to reduce interview length and
minimize recording errors. A Spanish Language translation and bilingual
interviewers will be used to minimize language barriers in
participation. The proposed surveys will be anonymous.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA)
mission is to save lives, prevent injuries, and reduce healthcare and
other economic costs associated with motor vehicle crashes. The
agency's goal is to reduce the rate of fatalities from speeding-related
crashes. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) was
established to reduce the mounting number of deaths, injuries, and
economic losses resulting from motor vehicle crashes on the Nation's
highways. As part of this statutory mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the development of motor vehicle
standards and traffic safety programs.
NHTSA has periodically updated its knowledge and understanding of
the public's attitudes and behaviors with respect to speeding. In 1998,
NHTSA conducted a national survey (National Survey of Speeding and
Other Unsafe Driving Actions: Volume III: Countermeasures, Final
Report) which indicated 71% of the general public favored automated
devices for speed enforcement, and 76% believed the use of automated
devices reduced speeding-related accidents. This survey also showed
females were 15% more likely to be in favor of using automated speed
enforcement than males, as well as, reasons why the public liked or
disliked automated speeding devices. Twenty percent (20%) liked
automated speeding devices because photo evidence proved a violation
and 19% liked it because it increased driver awareness and fewer law
enforcement officers were needed for traffic enforcement. Twenty-six
percent (26%) did not like automated speeding enforcement because it
invaded privacy, was a violation of rights or was a governmental
infringement. Four years later NHTSA sponsored another national survey
(National Survey of Speeding and Unsafe Driving Attitudes and Behavior:
2002: Volume II.) that found 68% of the general public believed the use
of automated speed enforcement was good for anyone driving at least 20
miles per hour more than the speed limit, and 78% favored automated
enforcement in a school zone. Fifty-Six percent (56%) of the public
favored photos being taken of the driver from a frontal view while 32%
favored taking photos of the rear license plate only. Since these
surveys were conducted years ago they cannot be used to evaluate new
programs scheduled to be initiated in the next few years.
Beginning in 2008, NHTSA intends to administer a demonstration
project over a three-year period that will include two years where
selected sites will incorporate both traditional law enforcement and
use of automated enforcement of speeding in the demonstration area. The
demonstration project will be accompanied by a Public Information and
Education campaign about speeding and driving safety. Before and after
this demonstration project, NHTSA will conduct telephone surveys in
waves of up to 400 adult drivers living in the selected demonstration
project areas, as well as, a comparison area. These surveys will
measure the change in public attitude about speeding and driving
behavior resulting from the enforcement and Public Information and
Education campaigns.
These surveys will collect the following type of information:
Whether members of the general public support automated enforcement; if
the support varies by the specific speed being traveled; where the
speeding occurs, such as a school zone or other road type; whether
there is a preference for photos to be taken of the driver versus the
license plate of the vehicle; whether there are a differences by sex or
age; the reasons for supporting or not supporting automated speed
enforcement versus traditional law enforcement officer enforcement;
whether members of the general public are aware of the public
information campaign in their area about speeding; whether this public
information campaign has caused them to change their opinions toward
speeding or whether the public information campaign has affected their
behavior by causing them to be more careful about observing speed
limits or reducing the speed they drive; the overall effectiveness of
the public information campaign; determining what is an appropriate
balance between automated speed enforcement and traditional law
enforcement officer enforcement; whether members of the general public
believe automated speeding enforcement should be expanded, and the
effectiveness of automated and traditional enforcement measures on
reducing crashes, injuries and saving lives.
These surveys will help NHTSA to evaluate a demonstration project
on speed management using automated and traditional speed enforcement.
The findings will be used to help focus the program and determine which
activities achieve the greatest benefit. This information will then be
used to develop new programs to decrease the likelihood of speeding,
and to provide
[[Page 6558]]
informational support to States, localities, and law enforcement
agencies that will aid them in their efforts to reduce speeding crashes
and injuries. This demonstration project could be a model for how
jurisdictions can develop a self-sustaining and effective speed
management program using both traditional and automated speed
enforcement methods. A demonstration project incorporating rational
speed limits, a public communications plan and rigorously enforced
speed limits over a defined geographic area will assist jurisdictions
in understanding how to gain higher compliance with speed limits and
bring about a reduction in speeding-related crashes, injuries and
deaths.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)
Under this proposed effort, NHTSA intends to conduct telephone
surveys to collect data from up to 1,600 licensed drivers age 18 and
older. Interviews will be conducted with persons at residential phone
numbers selected through random digit dialing and located within the
jurisdiction where the speed enforcement demonstration project is
conducted, as well as control areas. Businesses will be ineligible for
the sample and will not be interviewed. No more than one respondent
will be selected per household. Each member of the sample will complete
one interview. After each wave is completed and the data analyzed, the
findings will be disseminated to the participating States for review.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of Information
NHTSA estimates the respondents in the sample will require an
average of 10 minutes to complete the telephone interviews. Thus, the
estimated reporting burden hours on the general public will be a
maximum of 137 hours per year, for two years. The respondents will not
incur any reporting cost from the information collection. The
respondents also will not incur any record keeping burden or record
keeping cost from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Marilena Amoni,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8-2016 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P