Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India; Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 6125-6127 [E8-1895]

Download as PDF mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). In accordance with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(ii), for the final results in an antidumping duty new shipper review, interested parties may submit publicly available information to value FOPs within 20 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results. Interested parties must provide the Department with supporting documentation for the publicly available information to value each FOP. Additionally, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(1), for the final results of this new shipper review, interested parties may submit factual information to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information submitted by an interested party less than ten days before, on, or after, the applicable deadline for submission of such factual information. However, the Department notes that 19 CFR 351.301(c)(1) permits new information only insofar as it rebuts, clarifies, or corrects information recently placed on the record. 19 CFR 351.301(c)(1) does not envision the submission of additional, previously absent-from-the-record alternative surrogate value information. Therefore, parties should take note that surrogate value data that are introduced as rebuttal to a surrogate value submission generally will not fall within the meaning and applicability of 19 CFR 351.301(c)(1). See Glycine from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Rescission, in Part, 72 FR 58809 (October 17, 2007) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. Interested parties may submit case briefs and/or written comments no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of this new shipper review. See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals to written comments, limited to issues raised in such briefs or comments, may be filed no later than 5 days after the deadline for submitting the case briefs. See 19 CFR 351.309(d). The Department requests that interested parties provide an executive summary of each argument contained within the case briefs and rebuttal briefs. Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of these preliminary results. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Requests should contain the following information: (1) The party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:22 Jan 31, 2008 Jkt 214001 6125 raised in the briefs. If we receive a request for a hearing, we plan to hold the hearing seven days after the deadline for submission of the rebuttal briefs at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. The Department intends to issue the final results of these new shipper reviews, which will include the results of its analysis raised in any such comments, within 90 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Vietnam-wide rate (i.e., 63.88 percent); and (3) for subject merchandise manufactured by Anvifish, but exported by any other party, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the exporter. If the cash deposit rate calculated in the final results is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required for those specific producerexporter combinations. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Assessment Rates Upon completion of the final results, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries on a per-unit basis.10 calculate an assessment rate on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review. If these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of review, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate importer-specific (or customer) per-unit duty assessment rates. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this is above de minimis. This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing this determination in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(h)(i). Cash-Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this new shipper review for all shipments of subject merchandise from Anvifish entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise produced and exported by Anvifish, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for subject merchandise exported by Anvifish but not manufactured by Anvifish, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 10 We divided the total dumping margins (calculated as the difference between NV and EP or CEP) for each importer by the total quantity of subject merchandise sold to that importer during the POR to calculate a per-unit assessment amount. We will direct CBP to assess importer-specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit (i.e., per-kilogram) rates by the weight in kilograms of each entry of the subject merchandise during the POR. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notification to Interested Parties Dated: January 22, 2008. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E8–1899 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–840] Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India; Partial Rescission of Antidumping DutyAdministrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is rescinding the administrative reviews of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India for the period February 1, 2006, through January 31, 2007, for 114 companies, based on: 1) timely withdrawals of the review requests; 2) confirmed statements of no shipments during the period of review (POR); 3) our inability to locate certain companies; and/or 4) duplicated names in our notice of initiation. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 6126 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3874. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Background On February 2, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India for the period February 1, 2006, through January 31, 2007. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 72 FR 5007 (Feb. 2, 2007). Between February 21, 2007, and February 28, 2007, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2), certain Indian producers and exporters requested a review of this antidumping duty order. In addition, on February 28, 2007, the petitioner≤1 and the Louisiana Shrimp Association (LSA) also requested an administrative review for numerous Indian exporters of subject merchandise in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1). On March 17, 2007, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the petitioner withdrew its request for review for the following companies: 1) Amison Foods Ltd.; 2) Amison Seafoods Ltd.; 3) Baby Marine (Eastern) Exports; 4) Baby Marine Exports; 5) Baby Marine Products; 6) Cherukattu Industries (Marine Div.); 7) Global Sea Foods & Hotels Ltd.; 8) HA & R Enterprises; 9) InterSea Exports Corporation; 10) Kadalkanny Frozen Foods; 11) Lotus Sea Farms; 12) National Steel; 13) National Steel & Agro Ind.; 14) Nsil Exports; 15) Premier Marine Foods; 16) R.F. Exports; and 17) Vaibhav Sea Foods. In April 2007, the Department initiated an administrative review for 313 companies and we requested that each provide data on the quantity and value of its exports of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. These companies are listed in the Department’s notice of initiation. See Notice of Initiation of Administrative Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, Ecuador, India and Thailand, 72 FR 1 The petitioner in this proceeding is the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:22 Jan 31, 2008 Jkt 214001 17100, 17102–17107 (Apr. 6, 2007) (Notice of Initiation). In addition, between April and July 2007, the Department received responses to quantity and value questionnaires from certain companies that indicated that they either: 1) had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR; or 2) were duplicated in the Notice of Initiation. On July 5, 2007, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the LSA withdrew its request for review for 17 companies (i.e, Amison Foods Ltd.; Amison Seafoods Ltd.; Baby Marine (Eastern) Exports; Baby Marine Exports; Baby Marine Products; Cherukattu Industries (Marine Div.); Global Sea Foods & Hotels Ltd.; HA & R Enterprises; InterSea Exports Corporation; Kadalkanny Frozen Foods; Lotus Sea Farms; National Steel; National Steel & Agro Ind.; Nsil Exports; Premier Marine Foods; R.F. Exports; and Vaibhav Sea Foods). Partial Rescission of Review As noted above, the petitioner and the LSA both withdrew their requests for an administrative review for each of the following companies within the time limits set forth in 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1): Amison Foods Ltd.; Amison Seafoods Ltd.; Baby Marine (Eastern) Exports; Baby Marine Exports; Baby Marine Products; Cherukattu Industries (Marine Div.); Global Sea Foods & Hotels Ltd.; HA & R Enterprises; InterSea Exports Corporation; Lotus Sea Farms; National Steel; National Steel & Agro Ind.; Nsil Exports; Premier Marine Foods; R.F. Exports; and Vaibhav Sea Foods. Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department’s regulations requires that the Secretary rescind an administrative review if a party requesting a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation. Therefore, because all requests for administrative reviews were timely withdrawn for the companies listed above, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this review with regard to these companies.2 In addition, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), we are rescinding 2 Moreover, as noted above, the petitioner and the LSA also withdrew their requests for an administrative review for an exporter named Kadalkanny Frozen Foods. However, on April 23, 2007, Kadalkanny Frozen Foods informed the Department that it is a member of an affiliated group of companies (hereinafter referred to as ≥the Kadalkanny Group≥). On December 20, 2007, the Department collapsed the members of the Kadalkanny Group. Because there are outstanding requests for review for the remaining members of this group, we are not rescinding the review for Kadalkanny Frozen Foods. PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the review with respect to the following 70 companies because these companies reported no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR: 1) Abad Fisheries 2) Accelerated Freeze Drying Co. 3) Allana Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. 4) Allanasons Ltd. 5) Amalgam Foods & Beverages Limited 6) Amulya Sea Foods 7) Anjaneya Seafoods 8) Baby Marine International 9) Bhavani Seafoods 10) Bijaya Marine Products 11) Blue Water Foods & Exports 12) BMR Exports 13) Britto Exports 14) C P Aquaculture (India) Ltd. 15) Capithan Exporting Co 16) Chemmeens (Regd.) 17) Coastal Corporation Ltd. 18) Cochin Frozen Food Exports Pvt. Ltd. 19) Corlim Marine Exports Pvt. Ltd. 20) Esmario Export Enterprises 21) Forstar Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. 22) Frigerio Conserva Allana Limited 23) Frontline Exports Pvt. Ltd. 24) G A Randerian Ltd. 25) GKS Business Associates Pvt. Ltd. 26) Geo Aquatic Products (P) Ltd. 27) Geo Seafoods 28) Grandtrust Overseas (P) Ltd. 29) HIC AFB Special Foods Pvt. Ltd. 30) Hiravata Ice & Cold Storage 31) Hiravati Exports Pvt. Ltd. 32) Hiravati International P. Ltd. 33) Indian Aquatic Products 34) Innovative Foods Limited/Amalgam Foods Ltd. 35) International Freezefish Exports 36) Interseas 37) Jagadeesh Marine Exports 38) Jinny Marine Traders 39) K R M Marine Exports Ltd. 40) Kalyanee Marine 41) Kay Kay Exports 42) Koluthara Exports Ltd. 43) L.G. Seafoods 44) Lewis Natural Foods Ltd. 45) Libran Cold Storages (P) Ltd. 46) M.S.C. Marine Exporters 47) Malnad Exports Pvt. Ltd. 48) Meenaxi Fisheries Pvt. Ltd. 49) Naga Hanuman Fish Packers 50) Naik Seafoods Ltd. 51) Pijikay International Exports P Ltd. 52) Pisces Seafood International 53) Raunaq Ice & Cold Storage 54) Raysons Aquatics Pvt. Ltd. 55) RBT Exports 56) Rohi Marine Private Ltd. 57) S Chanchala Combines 58) SSF Ltd. 59) Sagar Foods 60) Sagarvihar Fisheries Pvt. Ltd. 61) Sanchita Marine Products P Ltd. 62) Sawant Food Products 63) Silver Seafood E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices 64) Sita Marine Exports 65) Sri Satya Marine Exports 66) Sri Venkata Padmavathi Marine Foods Pvt. Ltd. 67) Sterling Foods 68) TBR Exports Pvt Ltd. 69) Teekay Maine P. Ltd. 70) Victoria Marine & Agro Exports Ltd. We reviewed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data and confirmed that there were no entries of subject merchandise from any of these companies. Consequently, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) and consistent with our practice, we are rescinding our review for the companies listed above. See, e.g., Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; Final Results and Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review in Part, 71 FR 65082, 65083 (Nov. 7, 2006) (Rebar from Turkey). See also Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India; Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 41419 (July 21, 2006). Further, with respect to the following companies, the Department either: 1) was unable to locate accurate addresses for them, and thus was unable to serve them with any information requests in this case; or 2) determined based on information on the record that the noted company names do not, or no longer, exist3: 1) AMI Food Products; 2) Atta Export; 3) Brilliant Exports; 4) Castlerock Seafoods Ltd; 5) Coastal Trawlers Ltd.; 6) Hanjar Ice and Cold Storage; 7) Haripriya Marine Food Exports; 8) I Ahamed & Company; 9) KNR Marine Exports; 10) KRM Group; 11) Nezami Rekha Sea Food; 12) Pronto Foods Pvt. Ltd.; 13) RVR Marine Products; 14) Royal Cold Storage (India) Pvt. Ltd; 15) S B Agro (India) Ltd.; 16) Saanthi Seafoods Ltd.; 17) Sharon Exports; 18) Sheimar Seafoods Ltd.; 19) Sree Vaialakshrm Exports; 20) Swarna Seafoods Ltd.; and 21) Wisdom Marine Exports. See the June 1, 2007, Memorandum to the File from Elizabeth Eastwood entitled, ‘‘2006–2007 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, India, and Thailand: Information Regarding Incorrect Addresses.’’ See also the June 4, 2007, Memorandum to the File from Elizabeth Eastwood entitled, ‘‘Revisions to June 1, 2007, Memorandum Regarding Incorrect Addresses in the 2006–2007 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain 3 See the July 19, 2007, Memorandum from James Maeder to Stephen J. Claeys entitled, ‘‘2006-2007 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: Selection of Respondents for Individual Review’’ at Attachment 6. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:22 Jan 31, 2008 Jkt 214001 Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India.’’ Subsequently, we contacted the petitioner and the LSA and requested that they provide alternate addresses for these companies. For the companies noted above, we note that neither the petitioner nor the LSA was able to provide alternate addresses or, if they did provide additional address information, the new addresses continued to be ‘‘undeliverable.’’ Consequently, in accordance with our practice, we are also rescinding our review with respect to these companies. See Rebar from Turkey, 71 FR at 65083. The Department has also received information that the following company names are duplicate names: 1) Innovative Foods Limited/Amalgam Foods Limited; 2) K.V. Marine Exports; 3) M.S.C. Marine Exporters; 4) Sprint Exports; and 5) Universal Cold Storage Ltd. These names are either: 1) partial versions of names of other companies for which we initiated an administrative review (i.e., Sprint Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Universal Cold Storage Private Limited); or 2) companies for which we initiated multiple administrative reviews because the petitioner, the LSA, and/or the respondent listed separate addresses for these companies in their review requests (i.e., Innovative Foods Limited/ Amalgam Foods Limited4; M.S.C. Marine Exporters5; and K.V. Marine Exports). Therefore, we are also rescinding the review with respect to these duplicate company names/ addresses. Finally, the Department received no– shipment responses from the following companies for which there appeared to be U.S. customs entries of subject merchandise: 1) Ayshwarya Seafood Private Limited; and 2) Triveni Fisheries (P) Ltd. We requested data on the relevant entries from CBP and determined that the entries were not reportable transactions because they were reported by another company in its quantity and value questionnaire. Under these circumstances, we determine that these companies satisfy the requirement under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) not to have ‘‘entries, exports, or sales of the subject merchandise,’’ and, consistent with the Department’s practice, we are rescinding the review with respect to these companies. See, e.g., Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; Final Results, Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 4 We are rescinding our review with respect to Innovative Foods Limited/Amalgam Foods Limited because the company had no shipments during the POR. See page 5, above. 5 We are rescinding our review with respect to M.S.C. Marine Exporters because the company had no shipments during the POR. See page 5, above. PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6127 Review in Part, and Determination to Revoke in Part, 70 FR 67665, 67666 (Nov. 8, 2005). This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: January 25, 2008. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E8–1895 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–848] Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of the 2005–2006 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 2005– 2006 New Shipper Reviews Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Blackledge or Jeff Pedersen, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–3518 and (202) 482–2769, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On October 30, 2006, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published a notice of initiation of four new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 63284 (October 30, 2006). On October 31, 2006, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published a notice of initiation of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the PRC. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 63752 (October 31, 2006). On March 23, 2007, the Department aligned the time limits in the new shipper reviews with the time limits in the administrative review. See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6125-6127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-840]


Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India; Partial Rescission of 
Antidumping DutyAdministrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is rescinding the 
administrative reviews of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen 
warmwater shrimp from India for the period February 1, 2006, through 
January 31, 2007, for 114 companies, based on: 1) timely withdrawals of 
the review requests; 2) confirmed statements of no shipments during the 
period of review (POR); 3) our inability to locate certain companies; 
and/or 4) duplicated names in our notice of initiation.

[[Page 6126]]


EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3874.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 2, 2007, the Department published in the Federal 
Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of 
the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 
India for the period February 1, 2006, through January 31, 2007. See 
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 72 FR 5007 
(Feb. 2, 2007). Between February 21, 2007, and February 28, 2007, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2), certain Indian producers and 
exporters requested a review of this antidumping duty order. In 
addition, on February 28, 2007, the petitioner>\1\ and the Louisiana 
Shrimp Association (LSA) also requested an administrative review for 
numerous Indian exporters of subject merchandise in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.213(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The petitioner in this proceeding is the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade 
Action Committee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 17, 2007, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 
petitioner withdrew its request for review for the following companies: 
1) Amison Foods Ltd.; 2) Amison Seafoods Ltd.; 3) Baby Marine (Eastern) 
Exports; 4) Baby Marine Exports; 5) Baby Marine Products; 6) Cherukattu 
Industries (Marine Div.); 7) Global Sea Foods & Hotels Ltd.; 8) HA & R 
Enterprises; 9) InterSea Exports Corporation; 10) Kadalkanny Frozen 
Foods; 11) Lotus Sea Farms; 12) National Steel; 13) National Steel & 
Agro Ind.; 14) Nsil Exports; 15) Premier Marine Foods; 16) R.F. 
Exports; and 17) Vaibhav Sea Foods.
    In April 2007, the Department initiated an administrative review 
for 313 companies and we requested that each provide data on the 
quantity and value of its exports of subject merchandise to the United 
States during the POR. These companies are listed in the Department's 
notice of initiation. See Notice of Initiation of Administrative 
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Frozen Warmwater 
Shrimp From Brazil, Ecuador, India and Thailand, 72 FR 17100, 17102-
17107 (Apr. 6, 2007) (Notice of Initiation).
    In addition, between April and July 2007, the Department received 
responses to quantity and value questionnaires from certain companies 
that indicated that they either: 1) had no shipments of subject 
merchandise to the United States during the POR; or 2) were duplicated 
in the Notice of Initiation.
    On July 5, 2007, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the LSA 
withdrew its request for review for 17 companies (i.e, Amison Foods 
Ltd.; Amison Seafoods Ltd.; Baby Marine (Eastern) Exports; Baby Marine 
Exports; Baby Marine Products; Cherukattu Industries (Marine Div.); 
Global Sea Foods & Hotels Ltd.; HA & R Enterprises; InterSea Exports 
Corporation; Kadalkanny Frozen Foods; Lotus Sea Farms; National Steel; 
National Steel & Agro Ind.; Nsil Exports; Premier Marine Foods; R.F. 
Exports; and Vaibhav Sea Foods).

Partial Rescission of Review

    As noted above, the petitioner and the LSA both withdrew their 
requests for an administrative review for each of the following 
companies within the time limits set forth in 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1): 
Amison Foods Ltd.; Amison Seafoods Ltd.; Baby Marine (Eastern) Exports; 
Baby Marine Exports; Baby Marine Products; Cherukattu Industries 
(Marine Div.); Global Sea Foods & Hotels Ltd.; HA & R Enterprises; 
InterSea Exports Corporation; Lotus Sea Farms; National Steel; National 
Steel & Agro Ind.; Nsil Exports; Premier Marine Foods; R.F. Exports; 
and Vaibhav Sea Foods. Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department's 
regulations requires that the Secretary rescind an administrative 
review if a party requesting a review withdraws the request within 90 
days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation. Therefore, 
because all requests for administrative reviews were timely withdrawn 
for the companies listed above, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this review with regard to these 
companies.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Moreover, as noted above, the petitioner and the LSA also 
withdrew their requests for an administrative review for an exporter 
named Kadalkanny Frozen Foods. However, on April 23, 2007, 
Kadalkanny Frozen Foods informed the Department that it is a member 
of an affiliated group of companies (hereinafter referred to as 
the Kadalkanny Group). On December 20, 2007, 
the Department collapsed the members of the Kadalkanny Group. 
Because there are outstanding requests for review for the remaining 
members of this group, we are not rescinding the review for 
Kadalkanny Frozen Foods.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), we are 
rescinding the review with respect to the following 70 companies 
because these companies reported no shipments of subject merchandise 
during the POR:
1) Abad Fisheries
2) Accelerated Freeze Drying Co.
3) Allana Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd.
4) Allanasons Ltd.
5) Amalgam Foods & Beverages Limited
6) Amulya Sea Foods
7) Anjaneya Seafoods
8) Baby Marine International
9) Bhavani Seafoods
10) Bijaya Marine Products
11) Blue Water Foods & Exports
12) BMR Exports
13) Britto Exports
14) C P Aquaculture (India) Ltd.
15) Capithan Exporting Co
16) Chemmeens (Regd.)
17) Coastal Corporation Ltd.
18) Cochin Frozen Food Exports Pvt. Ltd.
19) Corlim Marine Exports Pvt. Ltd.
20) Esmario Export Enterprises
21) Forstar Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd.
22) Frigerio Conserva Allana Limited
23) Frontline Exports Pvt. Ltd.
24) G A Randerian Ltd.
25) GKS Business Associates Pvt. Ltd.
26) Geo Aquatic Products (P) Ltd.
27) Geo Seafoods
28) Grandtrust Overseas (P) Ltd.
29) HIC AFB Special Foods Pvt. Ltd.
30) Hiravata Ice & Cold Storage
31) Hiravati Exports Pvt. Ltd.
32) Hiravati International P. Ltd.
33) Indian Aquatic Products
34) Innovative Foods Limited/Amalgam Foods Ltd.
35) International Freezefish Exports
36) Interseas
37) Jagadeesh Marine Exports
38) Jinny Marine Traders
39) K R M Marine Exports Ltd.
40) Kalyanee Marine
41) Kay Kay Exports
42) Koluthara Exports Ltd.
43) L.G. Seafoods
44) Lewis Natural Foods Ltd.
45) Libran Cold Storages (P) Ltd.
46) M.S.C. Marine Exporters
47) Malnad Exports Pvt. Ltd.
48) Meenaxi Fisheries Pvt. Ltd.
49) Naga Hanuman Fish Packers
50) Naik Seafoods Ltd.
51) Pijikay International Exports P Ltd.
52) Pisces Seafood International
53) Raunaq Ice & Cold Storage
54) Raysons Aquatics Pvt. Ltd.
55) RBT Exports
56) Rohi Marine Private Ltd.
57) S Chanchala Combines
58) SSF Ltd.
59) Sagar Foods
60) Sagarvihar Fisheries Pvt. Ltd.
61) Sanchita Marine Products P Ltd.
62) Sawant Food Products
63) Silver Seafood

[[Page 6127]]

64) Sita Marine Exports
65) Sri Satya Marine Exports
66) Sri Venkata Padmavathi Marine Foods Pvt. Ltd.
67) Sterling Foods
68) TBR Exports Pvt Ltd.
69) Teekay Maine P. Ltd.
70) Victoria Marine & Agro Exports Ltd.
    We reviewed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data and 
confirmed that there were no entries of subject merchandise from any of 
these companies. Consequently, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) 
and consistent with our practice, we are rescinding our review for the 
companies listed above. See, e.g., Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing 
Bars From Turkey; Final Results and Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review in Part, 71 FR 65082, 65083 (Nov. 7, 2006) (Rebar 
from Turkey). See also Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India; 
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 
41419 (July 21, 2006).
    Further, with respect to the following companies, the Department 
either: 1) was unable to locate accurate addresses for them, and thus 
was unable to serve them with any information requests in this case; or 
2) determined based on information on the record that the noted company 
names do not, or no longer, exist\3\: 1) AMI Food Products; 2) Atta 
Export; 3) Brilliant Exports; 4) Castlerock Seafoods Ltd; 5) Coastal 
Trawlers Ltd.; 6) Hanjar Ice and Cold Storage; 7) Haripriya Marine Food 
Exports; 8) I Ahamed & Company; 9) KNR Marine Exports; 10) KRM Group; 
11) Nezami Rekha Sea Food; 12) Pronto Foods Pvt. Ltd.; 13) RVR Marine 
Products; 14) Royal Cold Storage (India) Pvt. Ltd; 15) S B Agro (India) 
Ltd.; 16) Saanthi Seafoods Ltd.; 17) Sharon Exports; 18) Sheimar 
Seafoods Ltd.; 19) Sree Vaialakshrm Exports; 20) Swarna Seafoods Ltd.; 
and 21) Wisdom Marine Exports. See the June 1, 2007, Memorandum to the 
File from Elizabeth Eastwood entitled, ``2006-2007 Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, 
India, and Thailand: Information Regarding Incorrect Addresses.'' See 
also the June 4, 2007, Memorandum to the File from Elizabeth Eastwood 
entitled, ``Revisions to June 1, 2007, Memorandum Regarding Incorrect 
Addresses in the 2006-2007 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India.'' Subsequently, we 
contacted the petitioner and the LSA and requested that they provide 
alternate addresses for these companies. For the companies noted above, 
we note that neither the petitioner nor the LSA was able to provide 
alternate addresses or, if they did provide additional address 
information, the new addresses continued to be ``undeliverable.'' 
Consequently, in accordance with our practice, we are also rescinding 
our review with respect to these companies. See Rebar from Turkey, 71 
FR at 65083.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See the July 19, 2007, Memorandum from James Maeder to 
Stephen J. Claeys entitled, ``2006-2007 Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: 
Selection of Respondents for Individual Review'' at Attachment 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department has also received information that the following 
company names are duplicate names: 1) Innovative Foods Limited/Amalgam 
Foods Limited; 2) K.V. Marine Exports; 3) M.S.C. Marine Exporters; 4) 
Sprint Exports; and 5) Universal Cold Storage Ltd. These names are 
either: 1) partial versions of names of other companies for which we 
initiated an administrative review (i.e., Sprint Exports Pvt. Ltd. and 
Universal Cold Storage Private Limited); or 2) companies for which we 
initiated multiple administrative reviews because the petitioner, the 
LSA, and/or the respondent listed separate addresses for these 
companies in their review requests (i.e., Innovative Foods Limited/
Amalgam Foods Limited\4\; M.S.C. Marine Exporters\5\; and K.V. Marine 
Exports). Therefore, we are also rescinding the review with respect to 
these duplicate company names/addresses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ We are rescinding our review with respect to Innovative 
Foods Limited/Amalgam Foods Limited because the company had no 
shipments during the POR. See page 5, above.
    \5\ We are rescinding our review with respect to M.S.C. Marine 
Exporters because the company had no shipments during the POR. See 
page 5, above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Department received no-shipment responses from the 
following companies for which there appeared to be U.S. customs entries 
of subject merchandise: 1) Ayshwarya Seafood Private Limited; and 2) 
Triveni Fisheries (P) Ltd. We requested data on the relevant entries 
from CBP and determined that the entries were not reportable 
transactions because they were reported by another company in its 
quantity and value questionnaire. Under these circumstances, we 
determine that these companies satisfy the requirement under 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(3) not to have ``entries, exports, or sales of the subject 
merchandise,'' and, consistent with the Department's practice, we are 
rescinding the review with respect to these companies. See, e.g., 
Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; Final Results, 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review in Part, and 
Determination to Revoke in Part, 70 FR 67665, 67666 (Nov. 8, 2005).
    This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: January 25, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-1895 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-S