Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty New-Shipper Review, 4828-4829 [E8-1443]
Download as PDF
4828
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–808]
Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
New-Shipper Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On October 26, 2007, the
Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of a new-shipper
review of the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel wire rods from India.
The stainless steel wire rods (wire rods)
were produced and exported by Sunflag
Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Sunflag). The
period of review (POR) is December 1,
2005, through November 30, 2006.
Based on our analysis of comments
received, we have not made any changes
to our decision to apply adverse facts
available to Sunflag’s U.S. sales.
Therefore, our final results are identical
to our preliminary results. The final
results are listed below in the section
entitled ‘‘Final Results of the NewShipper Review’’.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 28, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1757 and (202)
482–1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
On October 26, 2007, the Department
of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the
new-shipper review of the antidumping
duty order on stainless steel wire rods
from India. See Stainless Steel Wire
Rods from India: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty New-Shipper
Review, 72 FR 60808 (October 26, 2007).
We invited interested parties to
comment on the preliminary results.
Sunflag filed a case brief on November
26, 2007. Domestic interested parties,
Carpenter Technology Corp., North
American Stainless, and Universal
Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., filed a
rebuttal brief on November 27, 2007.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise under review is
wire rods, which are hot-rolled or hotrolled annealed and/or pickled rounds,
squares, octagons, hexagons or other
shapes, in coils. Wire rods are made of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Jan 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
alloy steels containing, by weight, 1.2
percent or less of carbon and 10.5
percent or more of chromium, with or
without other elements. These products
are only manufactured by hot-rolling
and are normally sold in coiled form,
and are of solid cross section. The
majority of wire rods sold in the United
States are round in cross-section shape,
annealed, and pickled. The most
common size is 5.5 millimeters in
diameter.
The wire rods subject to this order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015,
7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and
7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to the order is
dispositive of whether the merchandise
is covered by the order.
Final Results of the New-Shipper
Review
We determine that the adverse factsavailable margin on stainless steel wire
rods from India produced and exported
by Sunflag for the period December 1,
2005, through November 30, 2006, is
48.80 percent.
Analysis of Comments Received
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
this notice of final results of the newshipper review for all shipments of the
subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication, consistent with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act): (1) The cash-deposit
rate for stainless steel wire rods that
were produced and exported by Sunflag
will be 48.80 percent; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not
listed above, the cash-deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the
original less-than-fair-value
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash-deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash-deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be the allothers rate of 48.80 percent, which is
the all-others rate established in the
less-than-fair-value investigation. See
Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Stainless Steel
Wire Rods from India, 58 FR 54110
(October 20, 1993). These cash-deposit
rates shall remain in effect until further
notice.
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this newshipper review are addressed in the
‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’
(Decision Memorandum) from Stephen
J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated January 17, 2008,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
A list of the issues which the parties
have raised and to which we have
responded is attached to this notice as
an appendix. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
and corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum, which is on
file in Import Administration’s Central
Records Unit, Room B–099 of the main
Department building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision
Memorandum is available on the
Internet at https://iaita.doc.gov/frn/
index.html. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
No Changes Since the Preliminary
Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, the Department has
made no changes in the final results
from the preliminary results of newshipper review and confirms its
decision to apply adverse facts available
to Sunflag’s U.S. sales. Accordingly, as
a result of our review we determine that
a dumping margin of 48.80 percent
exists for Sunflag for the period
December 1, 2005, through November
30, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries. Because we
are relying on total adverse facts
available to establish Sunflag’s dumping
margin, we will instruct CBP to apply a
dumping margin of 48.80 percent to all
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR that were produced and
exported by Sunflag. We intend to issue
appropriate assessment instructions
directly to CBP 15 days after the
publication of these final results of the
new-shipper review.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
4829
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2008 / Notices
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to an administrative
protective order of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of
proprietary information disclosed under
such an order in accordance with 19
CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification
of the return or destruction of
administrative-protective-order
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an administrative
protective order is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 17, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
Comment 1: Errors in Home-Market Sales
Comment 2: Incomplete Home-Market Sales
Comment 3: Miscellaneous Errors
Comment 4: Ill–Preparedness for Verification
[FR Doc. E8–1443 Filed 1–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation
in Part
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) has received requests
to conduct administrative reviews of
various antidumping and countervailing
duty orders and findings with December
anniversary dates. In accordance with
our regulations, we are initiating those
administrative reviews. The Department
also received a request to revoke one
antidumping duty order in part.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 28, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Unit, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–4737.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department has received timely
requests, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b)(2004), for administrative
reviews of various antidumping and
countervailing duty orders and findings
with December anniversary dates. The
Department also received a timely
request to revoke in part the
antidumping duty order on Honey from
Argentina with respect to one exporter.
Initiation of Reviews
In accordance with section 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating
administrative reviews of the following
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders and findings. We intend to issue
the final results of these reviews not
later than December 31, 2008.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Period to be reviewed
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Argentina: Honey, A–357–812 ........................................................................................................................................
AGLH S.A.
Algodonera Avellaneda S.A.
Asociacion de Cooperativas Argentinas.
Bomare S.A. (Bodegas Miguel Armengol).
Compania Apicola Argentina S.A.
Compania Inversora Platense S.A.
El Mana S.A.
HoneyMax S.A.
Mercoline S.A.
Mielar S.A.
Nexco S.A.
Patagonik S.A.
Productos Afer S.A.
Seabird Argentina S.A.
Seylinco, S.A.
India: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23, A–533–838 ............................................................................................................
Alpanil Industries Limited.
Pidilite Industries Limited.
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products, A–533–820 ..................................................................................
Essar Steel Limited.
Ispat Industries Limited.
JSW Steel Limited.
Tata Steel Limited.
South Korea: Welded ASTM A–312 Stainless Steel Pipe, A–580–810 .........................................................................
SeAH.
The People’s Republic of China: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23,1 A–570–892 ...............................................................
Aesthetic Colortech (Shanghai) Company, Limited.
Anhui Worldbest IE Company, Limited.
Cidic Company, Limited.
Ganguink Group, Pigment Division.
Goldlink Industries Company, Limited.
Hunan Sunlogistics International Company, Limited.
Hygeia-Chem (Shanghai) Company, Limited.
Nantong Haidi Chemical Company, Limited.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Jan 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
12/01/06–11/30/07
12/1/06–11/30/07
12/1/06–11/30/07
12/1/06–11/30/07
12/1/06–11/30/07
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4828-4829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1443]
[[Page 4828]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-808]
Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty New-Shipper Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 26, 2007, the Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of a new-shipper review of the antidumping duty
order on stainless steel wire rods from India. The stainless steel wire
rods (wire rods) were produced and exported by Sunflag Iron & Steel
Co., Ltd. (Sunflag). The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2005,
through November 30, 2006. Based on our analysis of comments received,
we have not made any changes to our decision to apply adverse facts
available to Sunflag's U.S. sales. Therefore, our final results are
identical to our preliminary results. The final results are listed
below in the section entitled ``Final Results of the New-Shipper
Review''.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 28, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1757 and (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 26, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the new-shipper review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rods from India. See
Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty New-Shipper Review, 72 FR 60808 (October 26, 2007). We
invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary results.
Sunflag filed a case brief on November 26, 2007. Domestic interested
parties, Carpenter Technology Corp., North American Stainless, and
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., filed a rebuttal brief on
November 27, 2007.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise under review is wire rods, which are hot-rolled or
hot-rolled annealed and/or pickled rounds, squares, octagons, hexagons
or other shapes, in coils. Wire rods are made of alloy steels
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent
or more of chromium, with or without other elements. These products are
only manufactured by hot-rolling and are normally sold in coiled form,
and are of solid cross section. The majority of wire rods sold in the
United States are round in cross-section shape, annealed, and pickled.
The most common size is 5.5 millimeters in diameter.
The wire rods subject to this order are currently classifiable
under subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030,
7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to the order is dispositive of whether the
merchandise is covered by the order.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this new-shipper review are addressed in the ``Issues and Decision
Memorandum'' (Decision Memorandum) from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated January 17, 2008,
which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues which the
parties have raised and to which we have responded is attached to this
notice as an appendix. Parties can find a complete discussion of all
issues raised and corresponding recommendations in this public
memorandum, which is on file in Import Administration's Central Records
Unit, Room B-099 of the main Department building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision Memorandum is available on the
Internet at https://iaita.doc.gov/frn/. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
No Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, the Department has
made no changes in the final results from the preliminary results of
new-shipper review and confirms its decision to apply adverse facts
available to Sunflag's U.S. sales. Accordingly, as a result of our
review we determine that a dumping margin of 48.80 percent exists for
Sunflag for the period December 1, 2005, through November 30, 2006.
Final Results of the New-Shipper Review
We determine that the adverse facts-available margin on stainless
steel wire rods from India produced and exported by Sunflag for the
period December 1, 2005, through November 30, 2006, is 48.80 percent.
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. Because we are relying on total adverse facts available to
establish Sunflag's dumping margin, we will instruct CBP to apply a
dumping margin of 48.80 percent to all entries of subject merchandise
during the POR that were produced and exported by Sunflag. We intend to
issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after
the publication of these final results of the new-shipper review.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results of the new-shipper review
for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication,
consistent with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act): (1) The cash-deposit rate for stainless steel wire
rods that were produced and exported by Sunflag will be 48.80 percent;
(2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above,
the cash-deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-
value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most recent period for the
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash-deposit rate for all
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be the all-others
rate of 48.80 percent, which is the all-others rate established in the
less-than-fair-value investigation. See Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India, 58
FR 54110 (October 20, 1993). These cash-deposit rates shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
[[Page 4829]]
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order of their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information disclosed under such an order in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return
or destruction of administrative-protective-order materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an administrative
protective order is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 17, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
Comment 1: Errors in Home-Market Sales
Comment 2: Incomplete Home-Market Sales
Comment 3: Miscellaneous Errors
Comment 4: Ill-Preparedness for Verification
[FR Doc. E8-1443 Filed 1-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P