Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 3634-3648 [08-172]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
• International Trade Administration

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 22, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3634-3648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

19 CFR Part 351

[Docket No. 0612243018-8043-01]
RIN 0625-AA73


Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents 
Submission Procedures; APO Procedures

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is amending 
its regulations in antidumping (``AD'') and countervailing duty 
(``CVD'') proceedings governing information submitted to the Department 
and administrative protective orders in order to improve the 
Department's procedures and provide clarification to some aspects of 
the Department's regulations. Specifically, the Department is amending 
its regulations as follows: To reflect a transfer in the function of 
receiving submissions filed in AD/CVD proceedings from the Central 
Records Unit to the Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') Unit, and 
to change the name of the APO Unit to APO/Dockets Unit; to reflect the 
fact that the Central Records Unit has moved to Room 1117 of the 
Herbert C. Hoover Building; to reflect a transfer in the function of 
maintaining public service lists from the Central Records Unit to the 
APO/Dockets Unit; to update the definition of ``Customs Service'' to 
reflect the reorganization of the Executive Branch; to clarify that 
documents filed with the Department will only be time stamped when 
appropriate, for example, when an interested party submits a request 
for treatment as a voluntary respondent; to clarify when an APO will be 
placed on the record with respect to new shipper reviews, applications 
for scope rulings and changed circumstances reviews; to clarify when a 
party must serve business proprietary information already on the 
administrative record to new authorized applicants to the APO; to 
require parties to file a formal letter of appearance to request 
placement on the public service list of any segment of an AD/CVD 
proceeding, either as a cover letter to the APO application or as a 
separate document; and to clarify when a party is to be considered an 
``interested party'' for the purposes of the APO. Finally, the 
Department is amending its short form application for access under an 
APO (Form ITA-367).

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date of this final rule is 
February 21, 2008. The amended regulations will apply to all 
investigations initiated on the basis of petitions filed on or after 
February 21, 2008, and other segments of proceedings requested or 
initiated after this date. The amended APO application form will be 
effective for all ongoing segments pending before the Department as of 
the effective date or initiated on or after the effective date, except 
those segments initiated before June 3, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Sebastian at (202) 482-3354, 
William Kovatch at (202) 482-5052 or Carrie Owens at (202) 482-1353.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Pursuant to section 777(c)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (``the Act'') (19 U.S.C. 1677f(c)(1)(A)), the Department must 
make available to interested parties, under an APO, business 
proprietary information submitted to it during the course of an 
antidumping or countervailing duty proceeding. Section 777(c)(1)(B) of 
the Act authorizes the Department to issue regulations governing the 
APO process. The Department's current regulations are codified at 19 
CFR part 351.
    On January 8, 2007, the Department published proposed amendments to 
the rules governing procedures for providing access to business 
proprietary information submitted to the

[[Page 3635]]

Department by other parties in U.S. antidumping (``AD'') and 
countervailing duty (``CVD'') proceedings, and requested comments from 
the public. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents 
Submission Procedures; APO Procedures; Proposed Rule, 72 FR 680 
(``January Notice'').
    After analyzing and carefully considering all of the comments that 
the Department received in response to the January Notice and after 
further review of the provisions of the proposed rule, the Department 
is publishing final regulations. In an effort to continue to protect 
business proprietary information from unauthorized disclosure while 
permitting authorized applicants access to needed information, these 
regulations improve the Department's APO process, and clarify some 
prior regulatory provisions as they relate to that process.

Effective Date

    The new APO procedures, including the use of the revised 
application for an APO, form ITA-367 (2.08), will become effective 
February 21, 2008. The amended regulations will apply to all 
investigations initiated on the basis of petitions filed on or after 
February 21, 2008, and other segments of proceedings requested or 
initiated after this same date. Segments of proceedings to which these 
regulations do not apply will continue to be governed by the 
regulations in effect on the date the petitions were filed or other 
segments were initiated. The amended Form ITA-367 will apply to all 
ongoing segments pending before the Department as of the effective date 
and all segments initiated on or after the effective date, unless the 
segment was initiated before June 3, 1998.

Explanation of Particular Provisions

Section 351.102(b). Definitions. Definition of ``Customs Service'' and 
``Interested Party''

    Section 351.102(b) is definitional. Substantively, most of the 
definitions in this section remain unchanged from the prior regulation. 
The prior regulation, however, listed the terms in alphabetical order, 
without sequentially numbering the terms. The new regulation sets forth 
the terms defined in section 351.102(b) in sequentially numbered 
paragraphs, which will allow the Department to administer the APO 
function in a more precise manner.
    The Department has changed the definition of one of the terms 
listed in section 351.102(b), and added another. Specifically, in light 
of the recent reorganization of the Executive Branch, the Department 
has changed the definition of the term ``Customs Service'' to mean 
United States Customs and Border Protection of the United States 
Department of Homeland Security.
    The Department has also added a definition of the term ``interested 
party'' to section 351.105(b) for the purpose of submitting an APO 
application. Under the prior regulation, ``interested party'' was not 
defined, which created some confusion and difficulty in processing APO 
applications. Specifically, under section 351.305(b)(2), only the 
representatives of interested parties who are parties to the proceeding 
may apply for APO access. The Department takes seriously its 
responsibility to ensure that only persons authorized to have access to 
the business proprietary information submitted in any segment of a 
proceeding are granted such access under the APO. The APO application 
was designed to permit the Department to determine whether the 
applicant does indeed represent an interested party, and thus qualifies 
for access under the APO. To that end, Form ITA-367 requires the 
applicant to identify the interested party status of the party 
represented by checking ``petitioner,'' ``respondent,'' or ``other.'' 
If the applicant checks ``other,'' the form requires the applicant to 
identify the section of the Department's regulations that defines the 
party's interested party status. Under the prior regulations, this was 
not possible because the regulations did not provide a definition of 
the term ``interested party.''
    This situation caused a problem for the Department in identifying 
and verifying the interested party status of the party represented by 
the applicant, when the applicant did not represent a petitioner or a 
respondent. Specifically, the Department has experienced some problems 
in verifying when a party who is participating independently from any 
other party is an importer, as defined by the Act. For this reason, the 
Department has amended section 351.105(b) to include the definition of 
``interested party,'' and require applicants to indicate the specific 
section of the regulations that is the basis of the party's status as 
an interested party.
    This definition does not differ from the definition of ``interested 
party'' provided in section 771(9) of the Act, except that an importer 
of subject merchandise is defined in a different subparagraph from a 
manufacturer, producer and exporter of the subject merchandise. 
Defining ``importer'' in its own subparagraph is necessary to permit 
Department officials to readily identify when an applicant for APO 
access represents an importer.
    One commentor has expressed concerns that requiring a party to be 
more precise in identifying its status as an interested party may prove 
problematic. Specifically, the commentor considered that such a 
requirement could lead to the filing of a separate APO application for 
all of a respondent's affiliates who are interested parties. Often a 
respondent and its affiliated importer or importers are represented by 
the same firm, because their interests are aligned. In the commentor's 
view, requiring separate APO applications for each of the interested 
parties in such a situation could become unwieldy and burdensome. This 
commentor notes that the purpose of the APO application is to permit 
the representative of an interested party to see the business 
proprietary information of other parties to the proceeding in order to 
adequately represent the client's interest. When one firm already has 
access to the information under APO, no additional purpose is served by 
filing an additional APO application for each of the respondent's 
affiliates.
    In response to this commentor's concerns, it is not the 
Department's intention to alter its practice with respect to the APO 
application of a respondent and its affiliates who are all represented 
by the same firm. The commentor is correct that one purpose of the APO 
application is to permit the representative of a party to the 
proceeding to see the business proprietary information on the record of 
that segment of the proceeding to advocate for that party's interests. 
Another purpose of the application is to allow the parties submitting 
business proprietary information to the Department to know who is 
applying for access to that information, and what parties they 
represent. Where the same firm represents an interested party and the 
interested party's affiliates, there is no need to file separate APO 
applications for each of the affiliates. An applicant who represents an 
interested party and the interested party's affiliates may still file a 
single APO application, however, the applicant must identify in the 
application each of the affiliates he or she is representing. If an 
applicant represents multiple non-affiliated interested parties, the 
applicant may also include all of the interested parties on the same 
application. Any necessary clarifications with respect to the 
interested parties should be provided in the cover letter to the 
application, or as an attachment to the application.
    This amendment to the regulations is aimed at identifying when an 
applicant represents an importer participating

[[Page 3636]]

independently from any other respondent. When the representative of 
such an importer has applied for APO access, the Department has 
experienced some difficulty in confirming that the importer imports the 
subject merchandise from the county that is covered by the specific 
proceeding in question. Identifying when such an importer is 
participating in a segment of a proceeding is the first step needed to 
ensure that there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the 
importer is indeed an interested party, and its representative entitled 
to access to other parties' business proprietary information under APO. 
This is necessary for the Department to ensure that it is protecting 
the business proprietary information submitted to it during any segment 
from disclosure to any person not authorized to see the information.

Sections 351.103(a), 351.103(b), 351.103(c), 351.103(d) and 351.303(b). 
Location and Functions of the Central Records Unit and the APO Unit, 
Filing Documents, and Service Lists

    The Department is amending section 351.103(a) to reflect that fact 
that the Central Records Unit has moved to a new location within the 
Herbert C. Hoover Building. The Central Records Unit is now located in 
Room 1117.
    The Department is further amending sections 351.103(a), 351.103(b), 
351.103(c), and 351.103(d) of the regulations to reflect the transfer 
of the function of receiving submissions in antidumping and 
countervailing duty proceedings (i.e. the docket function) from the 
Central Records Unit to the APO Unit, and to change the name of the APO 
Unit formally to the APO/Dockets Unit.
    The Department is also amending section 351.103(c) to provide that 
a document will only be required to be stamped with the time of receipt 
in order to be considered timely filed, where necessary. Documents 
submitted to the Department will still be required to be stamped with 
the date of receipt. However, the Department no longer believes that it 
is necessary to time stamp every document submitted.
    There are a few instances where it will continue to be necessary to 
time stamp a document to establish timeliness. These instances include 
when the Department establishes a time other than the close of business 
as the deadline for the submission, and when the Department exercises 
its discretion to accept voluntary respondents. With respect to 
requests to be treated as a voluntary respondent, the time stamp is 
necessary to establish the order in which the Department receives such 
requests. Department officials and the APO/Dockets Unit will continue 
to coordinate with each other to determine whether it is necessary for 
a document to be time stamped, and to communicate such necessity with 
interested parties.
    The Department is amending section 351.103(d) to require interested 
parties who wish to be placed on the public service list to file a 
letter of appearance to make its request. The letter of appearance 
should identify the name of the interested party, how that party 
qualifies as an interested party, and the name of the firm representing 
that interested party, if appropriate. If an interested party is 
participating in conjunction with affiliated parties, the letter of 
appearance must list all of the affiliates. If a single firm is 
representing multiple interested parties, affiliated or unaffiliated, a 
single letter of appearance may be filed to cover all of the parties so 
represented. If the interested party is a coalition or association as 
defined in sections 771(9)(A), (E), (F) or (G) of the Act, the letter 
of appearance must identify all members of the coalition or 
association. Because the letter of appearance includes factual 
information (i.e. the name of the interested party, how the party 
qualifies as an interested party), the certification requirements of 
section 351.303(g) apply.
    One commentor expressed its support of this requirement. However, 
the commentor stated that the Department should clarify that this 
requirement does not apply to petitioners. The commentor contends that 
the petition already contains the information that would appear on the 
letter of appearance, which would make the additional formal letter of 
appearance unnecessary.
    Another commentor stated that while it has no objection to 
formalizing the requirement that a party file an entry of appearance, 
the Department should not require that this be a separate filing. The 
commentor contended that this requirement of a separate filing would be 
inefficient and burdensome on the parties. Specifically, the commentor 
noted that many parties file their APO applications with a cover letter 
which also serves as an entry of appearance on behalf of the interested 
party. Requiring two separate filings would waste resources and 
increase administrative burdens on the parties unnecessarily. This 
commentor suggested that the requirement of a separate filing would be 
more appropriately aimed at parties who do not seek access to business 
proprietary information under the APO, but who wish to monitor the 
proceedings.
    This commentor noted that under the Department's amended 
regulations and the revised Form ITA-367, interested parties will be 
required to categorize how they qualify as interested parties in the 
APO application without the requirement of a certification. Requiring a 
separate entry of appearance, with a certification from the party, 
would treat identical information inconsistently. It would also be 
burdensome to require parties to make multiple filings of similar 
information. Accordingly, this commentor suggested that the Department 
should simply require parties to file an entry of appearance and APO 
application together with a single certification of the entire 
submission.
    In response to these comments, the Department's purpose in 
proposing a requirement to file a letter of appearance as a separate 
document was to ensure that Department officials update the public 
service list when a party begins participating in an administrative 
proceeding. It is also the Department's desire, where possible, to 
minimize the burden on the parties when submitting documents during any 
proceeding.
    The Department agrees with the point made by both commentors that 
sometimes it is not necessary to require the letter of appearance to be 
an entirely new and separate submission. For example, in an 
investigation, the Department's regulations already require the 
petition to contain detailed information concerning the petitioner and 
the domestic industry. See 19 CFR 351.202(b). This information in the 
petition is already subject to certification requirements. See 19 CFR 
351.202(c).
    Similarly, when applying for APO access, Form ITA-367 requires the 
representatives of an interested party to disclose how the party 
qualifies as an interested party, and the contact information of the 
firm representing the interested party. Currently, the APO application 
requires a certification from the applicant, but not from the party 
itself. Nonetheless, as one commentor noted, many parties currently do 
file an entry of appearance as the cover letter to the APO application.
    In this regard, the Department agrees with the commentor that it is 
sufficient to require a party requesting APO access to submit a letter 
of appearance as a cover letter to the APO application, and thus the 
Department has revised section 351.305(b)(2) to provide for this 
clarification. The interested party would be required to certify as to 
the accuracy

[[Page 3637]]

of the information contained in the letter of appearance.
    It should be noted, however, that the APO application is not a 
submission made by the party itself. Rather it is a submission made by 
the representative of the party to request access to the business 
proprietary information submitted in that segment. Accordingly, the 
Department does not believe that it is necessary for the party to 
certify to the contents of the APO application. Rather, it is 
sufficient for the representative applying for access under APO to 
certify to the accuracy of the information contained in the APO 
application. Such certification is already included in Form ITA-367.
    Nonetheless, interested parties are not required to apply for APO 
access in order to participate in a segment before the Department. Many 
parties choose not to apply for access to the business proprietary 
information submitted by other parties, yet still participate by 
submitting factual information or written argument.\1\ The Department 
considers that it is appropriate to require these parties to submit a 
separate letter of appearance as a request to be placed on the public 
service list of the particular segment in which it is participating, 
and thus the Department has revised section 351.103(d)(1) to include 
language for this provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under the Department's regulations, an interested party may 
not apply for access under APO if that party only intends to 
``monitor'' the proceeding. Rather, only a representative of a party 
to the proceeding can apply for APO access. 19 CFR 351.305(b)(2). 
The regulations define a party to the proceeding as ``any interested 
party that actively participates through written submissions of 
factual information or written argument, in a segment of a 
proceeding.'' 19 CFR 351.102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 351.204(d). Requests for Treatment as a Voluntary Respondent

    As provided in section 351.204(d) of the Department's regulations, 
if the Department limits the number of exporters or producers 
individually examined under section 777A(c)(2) or section 777A(e)(2)(A) 
of the Act, the Department will examine voluntary respondents in 
accordance with section 782(a) of the Act. In order to be able to 
clearly identify voluntary respondents, and discern the order in which 
requests for voluntary respondent treatment have been submitted, the 
Department is amending section 351.204(d) to require an interested 
party seeking voluntary respondent treatment to indicate its request 
clearly on the first page of the first submission. This will alert the 
APO/Dockets Unit to the fact that the submission should be time 
stamped. This amendment is made in conjunction with the amendment to 
section 351.103(c) of the regulations. The Department received no 
comments on this amendment.

Section 351.305(a). Placing APOs on the Record in New Shipper Reviews, 
Applications for Scope Rulings, and Changed Circumstances Reviews

    The Department is amending section 351.305(a) of the regulations to 
place an APO on the record within five business days of the filing of a 
request for new shipper review, an application for a scope ruling, a 
request for a changed circumstances review or the self-initiation of a 
changed circumstances review by the Department. The Department is also 
clarifying that the reference to ``days'' in this section of the 
regulations refers to business days.
    Under the prior regulations, the Department would place an APO on 
the record within two days of the filing of a petition, or five days of 
initiating any other segment of a proceeding. At times, however, when 
determining whether to initiate a new shipper review, a scope inquiry 
or a changed circumstances review, the Department is required to 
consider business proprietary information. Accordingly, the Department 
finds it appropriate to permit representatives of interested parties to 
have access under APO to any business proprietary information submitted 
to the Department initiates these segments.
    One commentor expressed support for this change, noting that the 
change recognizes the problem created when the Department denies access 
to business proprietary information before these segments are 
initiated, and attempts to address it.

Section 351.305(b). Service Requirement of Documents Already on the 
Administrative Record to New Authorized Applicants

    The Department is amending section 351.305(b) of its regulations to 
require the service of all business proprietary information on the 
record on the representative of a party filing a timely application for 
APO access within two business days of the approval of the application. 
A timely application is one filed before the first questionnaire 
response has been submitted.
    When an application is filed after the day on which the first 
questionnaire response is submitted, the parties will have five 
business days from the approval of the application to serve all 
business proprietary information on the record to the new authorized 
applicant. When the representative of a party files an application 
after the submission of the first questionnaire response, that 
representative is liable for costs associated with the additional 
production and service of business proprietary information already on 
the record.
    One commentor proposed that the five day period should continue to 
apply in all circumstances. According to this commentor, the five day 
period has not caused any undue delays. Moreover, this commentor noted 
that imposing a more demanding requirement before responses have been 
filed would disproportionately affect petitioners. This commentor 
contends that the two-day requirement is intended to conform with the 
International Trade Commission's requirement that the petition be 
served within two days of the establishment of the Commission's APO 
service list. However, the commentor noted that the Commission issues 
its preliminary determination within 45 days of the filing of the 
petition, whereas the Department issues its preliminary determination 
140 days after initiation of the investigation.
    We have not adopted the commentor's suggestion. The requirement to 
serve all business proprietary information on the record within two 
days of the approval of a timely APO application existed prior to the 
adoption of the 1998 regulations. This requirement was inadvertently 
deleted from the regulations adopted in 1998.
    As the commentor noted, the Commission's regulations already 
require the petitioner to serve the petition on all parties who apply 
for APO access within two days of receiving notification of the 
Commission's approval of an APO application. 19 CFR 207.10(b)(1)(i). 
Thus, adopting a two-day requirement in the Department's regulations 
will not be unduly burdensome.

Section 351.305(d). Additional Documentation Required for Importers

    The Department is adding section 351.305(d) to its regulations, 
requiring the representatives of importers to provide documentary 
evidence confirming the interested party's status as an importer of the 
subject merchandise from the country subject to the proceeding. This 
requirement is necessary to permit the Department to ensure that only 
those who are authorized to receive access to the business proprietary 
information submitted to the record (that is, the representatives of 
interested parties who are also parties to the proceeding) gain access 
to that information.
    One commentor objected to this new requirement. This commentor 
contends

[[Page 3638]]

that there can be no justification for imposing this burden on 
importers, which it argues is discriminatory. The commentor argues that 
the statute makes no distinctions among the interested parties when it 
comes to granting access to business proprietary information. 
Accordingly, all interested parties must be treated the same way. The 
commentor argues that the Government may not discriminate against 
similarly situated persons without a rational basis for the 
differential treatment. The commentor does not believe that the 
Department has given sufficient justification for imposing this new 
burden on importers alone. Rather, the commentor contends that the 
Department could just as easily have a concern with whether a party 
claiming to be a domestic manufacturer, a union or an association is a 
bona fide interested party. The commentor urges the Department to drop 
its proposal.
    We disagree that importers are in a similar situation as other 
interested parties and that there is no rational reason for this 
requirement. Therefore, we have not adopted the commentor's suggestion. 
Specifically, as a matter of evidence, it is often easier for the 
Department to confirm whether a party claiming to be a domestic 
interested party or a respondent is in fact an interested party than it 
is to confirm whether a party is an importer of subject merchandise. 
That is, evidence demonstrating the interested party status of the 
domestic interested parties and the respondent is often already on the 
record in AD and CVD proceedings when such parties apply for APO 
access. By contrast, when an importer is participating independently 
from an exporter or manufacturer of subject merchandise, the Department 
requires evidence to confirm that the party is indeed an importer of 
subject merchandise before granting APO access.
    Given the serious task that has been assigned to the Department, 
namely the protection of business proprietary information submitted to 
it during an AD or CVD proceeding (see section 777(b)(1)(A) of the 
Act), the Department must proceed carefully to ensure that the parties 
whose representatives are applying for APO access do indeed qualify for 
such access. That is, the Department must be sure that the business 
proprietary information is not disclosed to those who are not 
authorized to see it.
    Such evidentiary problems generally do not exist in identifying 
when the representative seeking APO access represents a petitioner or 
other domestic producer or a union or an association of domestic 
producers. In an investigation, the petitioner must submit its 
petition, and include detailed information regarding itself and the 
domestic industry. See 19 CFR 351.202(b). This includes the names, 
addresses and telephone numbers of all known persons in the industry. 
19 CFR 351.202(b)(2). In this regard, section 732(c)(4) of the Act 
charges the Department with determining whether the petition has 
sufficient support from the domestic industry. To do this, the 
Department must be apprised of the identity of those who are members of 
the domestic industry and examine production data for those members 
identified. Because this information is placed on the administrative 
record before the initiation of any AD or CVD investigation, the 
Department normally does not require additional information to confirm 
the identity of petitioners in an investigation.
    Similarly, in an AD investigation, the petition must identify the 
names and addresses of all of the persons whom the petitioner believes 
are selling the subject merchandise at less than fair value. 19 CFR 
351.202(b)(7)(i)(A). In a CVD investigation, the petitioner must 
identify the names and addresses of all of the persons whom the 
petitioner believes are benefitting from a countervailable subsidy and 
are exporting to the United States. 19 CFR 351.202(b)(7)(ii)(A). 
Indeed, as a general rule, the Department calculates an individual 
weighted-average dumping margin or an individual countervailable 
subsidy rate for each known exporter or producer. See sections 
777a(c)(1) and 777A(e)(1) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.204(b).\2\ Thus, as a 
general matter, AD and CVD investigations are specific to identified 
exporters and producers. For the Department to accomplish its task, it 
must have on the administrative record information identifying who the 
exporters or producers are. Indeed, the Department generally only 
receives APO applications from representatives of foreign producers and 
exporters who are asked to provide information pertaining to their 
sales and production of subject merchandise, or who wish to become 
voluntary respondents and thus likewise provide the Department with 
their sales and production information. That information confirms the 
status of such foreign producers and exporters as interested parties. 
Thus, when the representative of a foreign producer or exporter applies 
for APO access, generally the evidence confirming that the respondent 
is an interested party is already on the administrative record.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Some alternatives exist to calculating individual margins 
and subsidization rates for each known exporter or producer. They 
include using statistically valid samples and limiting the number of 
exporters or producers examined due to practicality. See sections 
777A(a)(1), 777A(c)(2) and 777A(e)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While it is true that the petition must also contain information 
regarding the known importers or likely importers of the subject 
merchandise (see 19 CFR 351.202(b)(9)), the Department may not have the 
same amount of evidence on the administrative record identifying all of 
the importers of the subject merchandise. Moreover, it is possible that 
there are other importers, who are not known to the petitioner, who 
import the subject merchandise and desire to participate as a party to 
the proceeding.
    Moreover, as evidenced by section 351.213(b) of the Act, when the 
Department conducts an administrative review of an AD or CVD order, as 
a general matter the Department will review specific exporters or 
producers. The Department generally only receives APO applications from 
representatives of foreign producers or exporters in administrative 
reviews when those parties have requested a review for themselves, or 
have otherwise been identified in a request for review as producers or 
exporters of the subject merchandise. Thus, again, the identity of the 
exporter or producer of the subject merchandise in an administrative 
review is often not in question.
    With regard to coalitions or associations as defined in 
subparagraph (A), (E), (F) or (G) of section 771(9) of the Act, section 
351.103(d)(1) of these amended regulations clearly require that the 
letter of appearance identify all of the members of the coalition or 
association. This is meant to permit the Department to confirm that the 
coalition or association qualifies as an interested party under the 
Act, and thus qualifies to be a party to the proceeding.
    When it is appropriate, such as when there is a new party to the 
proceeding that has not participated in the investigation, the 
Department's practice is to request further information from the party 
to confirm that the party is in fact an interested party. This practice 
applies not only with respect to coalitions and associations, but also 
with respect to trade unions and other parties claiming to be domestic 
interested parties who have not previously participated in any segment 
of the proceeding.
    By contrast, the Department does not always have on the 
administrative record evidence identifying all of the importers of the 
subject merchandise when the representatives of such importers apply 
for access under the

[[Page 3639]]

APO. One context in which this problem often arises is where there are 
companion AD or CVD investigations involving the same merchandise, but 
exported from different countries. Sometimes, an importer will import 
the subject merchandise from one of the countries which are the subject 
of the investigations, but not others. The requirement to provide 
documentary evidence of the importer's interested party status is meant 
to ensure that the representatives of such importers are applying for 
APO access only in those particular proceedings in which the importer 
qualifies as an interested party.
    The burden that the Department is placing on the importer is not 
great. In most instances, a copy of Customs Forms 7501 will suffice. 
Indeed, the Department prefers that the Custom Form 7501 serve as the 
documentary evidence. This is a document that is likely already in the 
possession of the importer, and not difficult to produce when the 
representative is applying for APO access. In other instances, the 
interested party may be able to satisfy the requirement by submitting 
any other credible documentary evidence demonstrating that it either 
imports or intends to import the subject merchandise. When it is not 
practical for an importer to submit a copy of Customs Form 7501, the 
Department will work with the importer to determine if other 
documentary evidence exists that will be sufficient to confirm the 
importer's status as an interested party.
    The Department is also correcting the language of section 
351.305(d) as published in the January Notice concerning the required 
documentary evidence demonstrating that a party imports merchandise 
subject to the antidumping or countervailing duty proceeding. The 
correction is to clarify that this evidentiary requirement applies with 
respect to each segment of an antidumping or countervailing duty 
proceeding, and is not limited to certain specific segments of the 
proceeding. The language as published in the January Notice does not 
clearly state that this documentary evidence is required from importers 
in the investigation stage of a proceeding as well as in subsequent 
segments of the proceeding as was the Department's intent. Thus the 
Department has revised section 351.305(d) to require, from a party 
claiming to be an interested party by virtue of being an importer, 
documentary evidence demonstrating that the party imports merchandise 
either subject to the antidumping or countervailing duty proceeding, or 
subject to a scope inquiry.
    One commentor expressed confusion with the Department's explanation 
of its proposed amendment, specifically as it applies to parties who 
intend to import a product that is subject to a scope inquiry. This 
commentor argues that the Department regularly declines to initiate 
scope inquiries where the product is yet to be imported, and that the 
Department should not alter this practice.
    In response to this comment, the Department's practice is to issue 
a scope ruling or conduct a scope inquiry when the party requesting the 
ruling can show that the specific product in question is actually in 
production. The product need not be imported into the United States so 
long as the requestor can show evidence that the product is in 
production. The Department will not issue a scope ruling or conduct a 
scope inquiry on a purely hypothetical product. In line with this 
practice, the Department believes that it is appropriate to permit a 
party who is a potential importer of the product subject to the scope 
inquiry access to proprietary information under APO.
    The Department has clarified section 351.305(d) to conform to its 
practice. Where the segment in question concerns a specific time 
period, such as an investigation or an administrative review, the party 
claiming to be an importer must show documentary evidence, preferably 
Customs Form 7501, that it imported subject merchandise during the 
applicable period of investigation or period of review. For a scope 
inquiry, however, any interested party may participate in the scope 
inquiry. Thus, an importer may be given APO access during a scope 
inquiry, provided it can provide documentary evidence, again preferably 
a Customs Form 7501, that it imported subject merchandise. For those 
situations where the product subject to the scope inquiry is in 
production, but has not yet been imported into the United States, a 
potential importer of such product may be permitted to participate as a 
party to the proceeding, and be given access to the proprietary 
information under the APO, provided that the party can demonstrate that 
it has taken steps towards importing the merchandise in question. Such 
evidence, for example, can consist of preliminary communications 
concerning the product between the importer and the manufacturer or 
supplier.

Form ITA-367, Short Form Application for APO

    The Department is amending Form ITA-367 to require APO applicants 
in new shipper reviews to specifically identify the name of the 
exporter(s)/producer(s) that is/are covered by the new shipper review. 
This is necessary because the Department can initiate multiple new 
shipper reviews on the same date covering different manufacturers or 
exporters. While it is the Department's practice to issue a single APO 
for multiple new shipper reviews involving the same subject merchandise 
if initiated on the same date, the periods of review in question may 
not always be congruent. That is, the Department at times may exercise 
its discretion to expand the period of review for one new shipper, but 
not for another, depending on the circumstances. To accurately identify 
the APO governing new shipper reviews and to help identify the APO and 
public service lists for these segments, it is the Department's 
practice to individually name all of the parties being reviewed within 
the heading of these documents.
    Because the Department may conduct several scope inquiries during 
the existence of an AD or CVD order, to provide further clarity the 
Department is amending Form ITA-367 to specifically identify the 
product in question that is covered by the scope review.
    To identify with more clarity when an applicant is applying for APO 
access in a changed circumstances review, the Department is amending 
Form ITA-367 to allow applicants to check ``changed circumstances 
review'' and identify the date on which the request for a changed 
circumstances review was filed.
    To ensure timely distribution of the APO service list and any 
amendments thereto, the Department is amending Form ITA-367 to require 
the identification of the ``Lead Applicant,'' and to request an email 
address for the receipt of service lists.
    The Department is issuing a clarification regarding the effective 
date of the amended Form ITA-367. The effective date for the amended 
Form ITA-367 is February 21, 2008. It is the Department's intention to 
use only this new version of Form ITA-367, in all segments pending 
before the Department as of the effective date, except those initiated 
before June 3, 1998. The Department will post this version of Form ITA-
367 and remove any prior versions of the form from the Import 
Administration's Web site. Parties who practice before the Department 
are advised to update any word processing file they may use to prepare 
Form ITA-367, to reflect the amendments made to the current version of 
the form.
    To ensure that parties who practice before the Department need not 
keep track of multiple versions of Form ITA-

[[Page 3640]]

367, the Department is amending section 351.305(b)(2) of its 
regulations, by inserting the words ``the current version of'' before 
the word ``Form ITA-367'' in the first sentence of the regulation. By 
doing so, the Department is clarifying that should it amend Form ITA-
367 again in the future, the new version of the form shall be used in 
all segments pending before the Department as of the effective date of 
the new form, and not only in those segments initiated on or after the 
effective date.
    There are currently a few segments of proceedings initiated before 
June 3, 1998 still pending before the Department, all of which concern 
suspension agreements. Due to the fact that the rules concerning the 
authorized use of the business proprietary information submitted in 
those segments differ from segments initiated under the current version 
of the Department's APO regulations, the Department believes that it is 
appropriate for parties who wish to apply for access under APO in 
segments concerning those suspension agreements to use the version of 
Form ITA-367 that was in effect before June 3, 1998. However, the 
Department reserves the right to permit parties to use the current 
version of Form ITA-367 by including express language in the terms of 
the suspension agreements, should it renegotiate those terms in the 
future.
    The Department would like to take this opportunity to remind those 
who practice before it that the entire Form ITA-367 (2.08) must be 
submitted to the Department in order to gain access to business 
proprietary information under the APO. If any portion of the form is 
not applicable, the applicant should so indicate on the form itself, 
and submit the entire application form to the Department. Form ITA-367 
is available on the Department's Web site at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/apo/
index.html and may be reproduced using the applicant's word processor. 
The format of the application must be exactly as provided in the 
printed form, with no deviation. With respect to item 5 of the APO 
application, when identifying non-attorney applicants, any 
clarification as to the identity of those applicants must be explained 
in the cover letter, or as an attachment to the application. Such 
clarifications should not be added into Form ITA-367 itself.
    With respect to items 8 and 9, the exact format may be repeated to 
include additional applicants, as required (e.g., (2), (3), (4), etc.). 
Each applicant must sign and date the application in their own hand.
    The Department would also like to remind authorized applicants that 
an acknowledgment for support staff is a requirement under item 2 of 
the APO. Failure by a firm to maintain an acknowledgment for support 
staff for each segment of each proceeding when APO access has been 
granted would be a violation of the APO. Support staff do not apply 
separately for APO access, but they are required to sign the 
acknowledgment maintained by the firm.

Classification

E.O. 12866

    It has been determined that this notice is not significant for 
purposes of E.O. 12866.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Chief Counsel for Regulation at the Department certified to the 
Chief Counsel for Advocacy, Small Business Administration that this 
rule, if promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. The factual basis for this 
certification was published in the proposed rule and is not repeated 
here. No comments were received regarding the economic impact of this 
rule. As a result, no final regulatory flexibility analysis is required 
and none has been prepared.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not contain a collection of information for purposes 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, as amended (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.).

E.O. 12612

    This proposed rule does not contain federalism implications 
warranting the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 351

    Administrative practice and procedure, Antidumping, Business and 
industry, Cheese, Confidential business information, Countervailing 
duties, Freedom of information, Investigations, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: January 14, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

0
For the reasons stated, 19 CFR Ch. III is amended as follows:

PART 351--ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 351 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 1202 note; 19 U.S.C. 1303 
note; 19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.; and 19 U.S.C. 3538.

0
2. Section 351.102 is revised as follows:


Sec.  351.102  Definitions.

    (a) Introduction. The Act contains many technical terms applicable 
to antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings. In the case of 
terms that are not defined in this section or other sections of this 
part, readers should refer to the relevant provisions of the Act. This 
section:
    (1) Defines terms that appear in the Act but are not defined in the 
Act;
    (2) Defines terms that appear in this Part but do not appear in the 
Act; and
    (3) Elaborates on the meaning of certain terms that are defined in 
the Act.
    (b) Definitions.
    (1) Act. ``Act'' means the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
    (2) Administrative review. ``Administrative review'' means a review 
under section 751(a)(1) of the Act.
    (3) Affiliated persons; affiliated parties. ``Affiliated persons'' 
and ``affiliated parties'' have the same meaning as in section 771(33) 
of the Act. In determining whether control over another person exists, 
within the meaning of section 771(33) of the Act, the Secretary will 
consider the following factors, among others: Corporate or family 
groupings; franchise or joint venture agreements; debt financing; and 
close supplier relationships. The Secretary will not find that control 
exists on the basis of these factors unless the relationship has the 
potential to impact decisions concerning the production, pricing, or 
cost of the subject merchandise or foreign like product. The Secretary 
will consider the temporal aspect of a relationship in determining 
whether control exists; normally, temporary circumstances will not 
suffice as evidence of control.
    (4) Aggregate basis. ``Aggregate basis'' means the calculation of a 
country-wide subsidy rate based principally on information provided by 
the foreign government.
    (5) Anniversary month. ``Anniversary month'' means the calendar 
month in which the anniversary of the date of publication of an order 
or suspension of investigation occurs.
    (6) APO. ``APO'' means an administrative protective order described 
in section 777(c)(1) of the Act.
    (7) Applicant. ``Applicant'' means a representative of an 
interested party that has applied for access to business proprietary 
information under an administrative protective order.

[[Page 3641]]

    (8) Article 4/Article 7 review. ``Article 4/Article 7 review'' 
means a review under section 751(g)(2) of the Act.
    (9) Article 8 violation review. ``Article 8 violation review'' 
means a review under section 751(g)(1) of the Act.
    (10) Authorized applicant. ``Authorized applicant'' means an 
applicant that the Secretary has authorized to receive business 
proprietary information under an APO under section 777(c)(1) of the 
Act.
    (11) Changed circumstances review. ``Changed circumstances review'' 
means a review under section 751(b) of the Act.
    (12) Consumed in the production process. Inputs ``consumed in the 
production process'' are inputs physically incorporated, energy, fuels 
and oil used in the production process and catalysts which are consumed 
in the course of their use to obtain the product.
    (13) Cumulative indirect tax. ``Cumulative indirect tax'' means a 
multi-staged tax levied where there is no mechanism for subsequent 
crediting of the tax if the goods or services subject to tax at one 
stage of production are used in a succeeding stage of production.
    (14) Customs Service. ``Customs Service'' means United States 
Customs and Border Protection of the United States Department of 
Homeland Security.
    (15) Department. ``Department'' means the United States Department 
of Commerce.
    (16) Direct tax. ``Direct tax'' means a tax on wages, profits, 
interests, rents, royalties, and all other forms of income, a tax on 
the ownership of real property, or a social welfare charge.
    (17) Domestic interested party. ``Domestic interested party'' means 
an interested party described in subparagraph (C), (D), (E), (F), or 
(G) of section 771(9) of the Act.
    (18) Expedited antidumping review. ``Expedited antidumping review'' 
means a review under section 736(c) of the Act.
    (19) Expedited sunset review. ``Expedited sunset review'' means an 
expedited sunset review conducted by the Department where respondent 
interested parties provide inadequate responses to a notice of 
initiation under section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and Sec.  
351.218(e)(1)(ii).
    (20) Export insurance. ``Export insurance'' includes, but is not 
limited to, insurance against increases in the cost of exported 
products, nonpayment by the customer, inflation, or exchange rate 
risks.
    (21) Factual information. ``Factual information'' means:
    (i) Initial and supplemental questionnaire responses;
    (ii) Data or statements of fact in support of allegations;
    (iii) Other data or statements of facts; and
    (iv) Documentary evidence.
    (22) Fair value. ``Fair value'' is a term used during an 
antidumping investigation, and is an estimate of normal value.
    (23) Firm. For purposes of subpart E (Identification and 
Measurement of Countervailable Subsidies), ``firm'' is used to refer to 
the recipient of an alleged countervailable subsidy, including any 
individual, company, partnership, corporation, joint venture, 
association, organization, or other entity.
    (24) Full sunset review. ``Full sunset review'' means a full sunset 
review conducted by the Department under section 751(c)(5) of the Act 
where both domestic interested parties and respondent interested 
parties provide adequate response to a notice of initiation under 
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and Sec. Sec.  351.218(e)(1)(i) and 
351.218(e)(1)(ii).
    (25) Government-provided. ``Government-provided'' is a shorthand 
expression for an act or practice that is alleged to be a 
countervailable subsidy. The use of the term ``government-provided'' is 
not intended to preclude the possibility that a government may provide 
a countervailable subsidy indirectly in a manner described in section 
771(5)(B)(iii) of the Act (indirect financial contribution).
    (26) Import charge. ``Import charge'' means a tariff, duty, or 
other fiscal charge that is levied on imports, other than an indirect 
tax.
    (27) Importer. ``Importer'' means the person by whom, or for whose 
account, subject merchandise is imported.
    (28) Indirect tax. ``Indirect tax'' means a sales, excise, 
turnover, value added, franchise, stamp, transfer, inventory, or 
equipment tax, a border tax, or any other tax other than a direct tax 
or an import charge.
    (29) Interested party. For the purpose of submitting an application 
for APO access (Form ITA-367), ``Interested Party'' means:
    (i) A foreign manufacturer, producer, or exporter of subject 
merchandise,
    (ii) The United States importer of subject merchandise,
    (iii) A trade or business association a majority of the members of 
which are producers, exporters, or importers of subject merchandise,
    (iv) The government of a country in which subject merchandise is 
produced or manufactured or from which such merchandise is exported,
    (v) A manufacturer, producer, or wholesaler in the United States of 
a domestic like product,
    (vi) A certified union or recognized union or group of workers 
which is representative of an industry engaged in the manufacture, 
production, or wholesale in the United States of a domestic like 
product,
    (vii) A trade or business association a majority of whose members 
manufacture, produce, or wholesale a domestic like product in the 
United States,
    (viii) An association, a majority of whose members is composed of 
interested parties described in subparagraph (C), (D), or (E) of 
section 771(9) of the Act with respect to a domestic like product, and
    (ix) A coalition or trade association as described in section 
771(9)(G) of the Act.
    (30) Investigation. Under the Act and this Part, there is a 
distinction between an antidumping or countervailing duty investigation 
and a proceeding. An ``investigation'' is that segment of a proceeding 
that begins on the date of publication of notice of initiation of 
investigation and ends on the date of publication of the earliest of:
    (i) Notice of termination of investigation,
    (ii) Notice of rescission of investigation,
    (iii) Notice of a negative determination that has the effect of 
terminating the proceeding, or
    (iv) An order.
    (31) Loan. ``Loan'' means a loan or other form of debt financing, 
such as a bond.
    (32) Long-term loan. ``Long-term loan'' means a loan, the terms of 
repayment for which are greater than one year.
    (33) New shipper review. ``New shipper review'' means a review 
under section 751(a)(2) of the Act.
    (34) Order. An ``order'' is an order issued by the Secretary under 
section 303, section 706, or section 736 of the Act or a finding under 
the Antidumping Act, 1921.
    (35) Ordinary course of trade. ``Ordinary course of trade'' has the 
same meaning as in section 771(15) of the Act. The Secretary may 
consider sales or transactions to be outside the ordinary course of 
trade if the Secretary determines, based on an evaluation of all of the 
circumstances particular to the sales in question, that such sales or 
transactions have characteristics that are extraordinary for the market 
in question. Examples of sales that the Secretary

[[Page 3642]]

might consider as being outside the ordinary course of trade are sales 
or transactions involving off-quality merchandise or merchandise 
produced according to unusual product specifications, merchandise sold 
at aberrational prices or with abnormally high profits, merchandise 
sold pursuant to unusual terms of sale, or merchandise sold to an 
affiliated party at a non-arm's length price.
    (36) Party to the proceeding. ``Party to the proceeding'' means any 
interested party that actively participates, through written 
submissions of factual information or written argument, in a segment of 
a proceeding. Participation in a prior segment of a proceeding will not 
confer on any interested party ``party to the proceeding'' status in a 
subsequent segment.
    (37) Person. ``Person'' includes any interested party as well as 
any other individual, enterprise, or entity, as appropriate.
    (38) Price adjustment. ``Price adjustment'' means any change in the 
price charged for subject merchandise or the foreign like product, such 
as discounts, rebates and post-sale price adjustments, that are 
reflected in the purchaser's net outlay.
    (39) Prior-stage indirect tax. ``Prior-stage indirect tax'' means 
an indirect tax levied on goods or services used directly or indirectly 
in making a product.
    (40) Proceeding. A ``proceeding'' begins on the date of the filing 
of a petition under section 702(b) or section 732(b) of the Act or the 
publication of a notice of initiation in a self-initiated investigation 
under section 702(a) or section 732(a) of the Act, and ends on the date 
of publication of the earliest notice of:
    (i) Dismissal of petition,
    (ii) Rescission of initiation,
    (iii) Termination of investigation,
    (iv) A negative determination that has the effect of terminating 
the proceeding,
    (v) Revocation of an order, or
    (vi) Termination of a suspended investigation.
    (41) Rates. ``Rates'' means the individual weighted-average dumping 
margins, the individual countervailable subsidy rates, the country-wide 
subsidy rate, or the all-others rate, as applicable.
    (42) Respondent interested party. ``Respondent interested party'' 
means an interested party described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of 
section 771(9) of the Act.
    (43) Sale. A ``sale'' includes a contract to sell and a lease that 
is equivalent to a sale.
    (44) Secretary. ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of Commerce or a 
designee. The Secretary has delegated to the Assistant Secretary for 
Import Administration the authority to make determinations under title 
VII of the Act and this Part.
    (45) Section 753 review. ``Section 753 review'' means a review 
under section 753 of the Act.
    (46) Section 762 review. ``Section 762 review'' means a review 
under section 762 of the Act.
    (47) Segment of proceeding--(i) In general. An antidumping or 
countervailing duty proceeding consists of one or more segments. 
``Segment of a proceeding'' or ``segment of the proceeding'' refers to 
a portion of the proceeding that is reviewable under section 516A of 
the Act.
    (ii) Examples. An antidumping or countervailing duty investigation 
or a review of an order or suspended investigation, or a scope inquiry 
under Sec.  351.225, each would constitute a segment of a proceeding.
    (48) Short-term loan. ``Short-term loan'' means a loan, the terms 
of repayment for which are one year or less.
    (49) Sunset review. ``Sunset review'' means a review under section 
751(c) of the Act.
    (50) Suspension of liquidation. ``Suspension of liquidation'' 
refers to a suspension of liquidation ordered by the Secretary under 
the authority of title VII of the Act, the provisions of this Part, or 
section 516a(g)(5)(C) of the Act, or by a court of the United States in 
a lawsuit involving action taken, or not taken, by the Secretary under 
title VII of the Act or the provisions of this Part.
    (51) Third country. For purposes of subpart D, ``third country'' 
means a country other than the exporting country and the United States. 
Under section 773(a) of the Act and subpart D, in certain circumstances 
the Secretary may determine normal value on the basis of sales to a 
third country.
    (52) URAA. ``URAA'' means the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.

0
3. Section 351.103 is revised as follows:


Sec.  351.103  Central Records Unit and Administrative Protective Order 
and Dockets Unit.

    (a) Import Administration's Central Records Unit maintains a Public 
File Room in Room 1117, U.S. Department of Commerce, Pennsylvania 
Avenue and 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20230. The office hours of 
the Public File Room are between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. on business days. 
Among other things, the Central Records Unit is responsible for 
maintaining an official and public record for each antidumping and 
countervailing duty proceeding (see Sec.  351.104), and the Subsidies 
Library (see section 775(2) and section 777(a)(1) of the Act).
    (b) Import Administration's Administrative Protective Order and 
Dockets Unit (APO/Dockets Unit) is located in Room 1870, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Pennsylvania Avenue and 14th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230. The office hours of the APO/Dockets Unit are 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. on business days. Among other things, the 
APO/Dockets Unit is responsible for receiving submissions from 
interested parties, issuing administrative protective orders (APOs), 
maintaining the APO service list and the public service list as 
provided for in paragraph (d) of this section, releasing business 
proprietary information under APO, and conducting APO violation 
investigations. The APO/Dockets Unit also is the contact point for 
questions and concerns regarding claims for business proprietary 
treatment of information and proper public versions of submissions 
under Sec.  351.105 and Sec.  351.304.
    (c) Filing of documents with the Department. While persons are free 
to provide Department officials with courtesy copies of documents, no 
document will be considered as having been received by the Secretary 
unless it is submitted to the Import Administration's APO/Dockets Unit 
in Room 1870 and is stamped with the date, and, where necessary, the 
time, of receipt.
    (d) Service list. The APO/Dockets Unit will maintain and make 
available a public service list for each segment of a proceeding. The 
service list for an application for a scope ruling is described in 
Sec.  351.225(n).
    (1) With the exception of a petitioner filing a petition in an 
investigation, to be included on the public service list for a 
particular segment, each interested party must file a letter of 
appearance. The letter of appearance must identify the name of the 
interested party, how that party qualifies as an interested party, and 
the name of the firm, if any, representing the interested party in this 
segment of the proceeding. The letter of appearance may be filed as a 
cover letter to an application for APO access. If the representative of 
the party is not requesting access to business proprietary information 
under APO, the letter of appearance must be filed separately from any 
other document filed with the Department. If the interested party is a 
coalition or association as defined in subparagraph (A), (E), (F) or 
(G) of section 771(9) of the Act, the letter of appearance must

[[Page 3643]]

identify all of the members of the coalition or association.
    (2) Each interested party that asks to be included on the public 
service list for a segment of a proceeding must designate a person to 
receive service of documents filed in that segment.

0
4. Add paragraph (d)(4) of Sec.  351.204 to read as follows:


Sec.  351.204  Time periods and persons examined; voluntary 
respondents; exclusions.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (4) Requests for voluntary respondent treatment. An interested 
party seeking treatment as a voluntary respondent must so indicate by 
including as a title on the first page of the first submission, 
``Request for Voluntary Respondent Treatment.''
* * * * *

0
5. Revise paragraph (b) of Sec.  351.303 to read as follows:


Sec.  351.303  Filing, format, translation, service, and certification 
of documents.

* * * * *
    (b) Where to file; time of filing. Persons must address and submit 
all documents to the Secretary of Commerce, Attention: Import 
Administration, APO/Dockets Unit, Room 1870, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Stre